Meeker Manor Rehablitation Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 50.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to identify heat register as safety hazard for 1 of 1 resident's (R1) bed that was too close to the heat who had a history of sleeping with his legs off the bed. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1. The IJ began on 3/1/24, when the facility failed to ensure R1's bed was a safe distance from the heat source, R1 was found with is left foot on top of the heater which resulted in multiple second degree burns to the foot and required admission to hospital burn unit for treatment. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 3/6/24 at 4:51 p.m. The facility implemented corrective action and the deficient practice was corrected on 3/1/24, prior to the survey and was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: Second degree burn: is also called partial thickness burn. These burns involve the outer layer of skin (epidermis). They can extend to the middle skin layer (dermis). Second…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an interdisciplinary team (IDT) assessment was completed to determine whether self-administration of medication was clinically appropriate and safe prior to permitting self-administration of nebulizer treatments, for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for self-administration of medications.Findings include:R1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). R1's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm), heart failure (a condition in which the heart cannot pump blood effectively), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; enlargement of the prostate gland that can affect urination), stroke (damage to the brain caused by interrupted blood flow), malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition due to inadequate intake or absorption), anxiety disorder (a condition involving excessive worry or fear), and depression (a mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychotropic medications were adequately assessed and monitored. Further the facility failed to initiate target behavior monitoring for 1 of 5 residents (R3) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications.Findings include:R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). R3's diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction (impaired brain function not caused by injury), unspecified dementia without behavioral, psychological, mood, or anxiety disturbances (decline in memory and thinking abilities), non-Alzheimer's dementia (cognitive decline not caused by Alzheimer's disease), anxiety disorder (a condition involving excessive worry or fear), and mood affective disorder (a mental health condition affecting mood and emotional state). The MDS further identified R3 received antipsychotic, antidepressant,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans to address significant medical conditions and medication-related risks, including failure to care plan anticoagulant therapy for 2 of 2 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for anticoagulant medications, and failure to care plan cardiac conditions, pacemaker presence, and condom catheter use for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for cardiac care needs.Findings include:R1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). R1's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm), heart failure (a condition in which the heart cannot pump blood effectively), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; enlargement of the prostate gland that can affect urination), stroke (damage to the brain caused by interrupted blood flow), malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition due to inadequate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine bathing and grooming services necessary to maintain personal hygiene and dignity, including failure to provide scheduled weekly bathing and failure to assist with facial hair grooming for 2 of 6 residents (R2 and R21) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care.Findings include:R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R2's diagnoses included primary generalized osteoarthritis, atrial fibrillation, urinary tract infection (last 30 days), thyroid disorder, depression, chronic pain syndrome, urge incontinence, suicidal ideations, and weakness.R2's care plan printed 5/19/26, identified a self-care deficit related to falls. The care plan identified interventions and goals which included R2 would accept assistance with self-cares and would be dressed, groomed, and bathed per preferences.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided for the management of an external urinary catheter system, including failure to obtain physician orders and implement care instructions for cleaning, disinfecting, and changing the condom catheter drainage bag for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for urinary catheter care.Findings include:R1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). R1's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm), heart failure (a condition in which the heart cannot pump blood effectively), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; enlargement of the prostate gland that can affect urination), stroke (damage to the brain caused by interrupted blood flow), malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition due to inadequate intake or absorption), anxiety disorder (a condition involving excessive worry or fear),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to clarify R5's oxygen (O2) order, reconcile the O2 order, and administer O2 as ordered for 1 of 1 (R5) resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings include: Review of State Agency (SA) report, dated 9/21/25 at 7:17 p.m., identified R5's family member noticed an oxygen tank in R5's room that was not in use since their admission to the facility. R5's undated, current Minimum Data Set (MDS) list identified R5 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of obstructive sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R5's 9/19/25, Orders Discharge Report identified R5 was to take oxygen (O2) 2 liters (L) by inhalation route at bedtime. R5's 9/19/25, Admission/Initial Data Collection assessment sheet identified in the respiratory status section related to oxygen needs was left blank. R5's 9/19/25, 48-Hour Care Plan identified R5 had an alteration in oxygen/gas exchange. The goal was to have adequate gas exchange with no cyanosis (bluish discoloration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supply of medication was obtained and administered as ordered for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R1) reviewed for pharmacy services.Findings include: Review of State Agency (SA) report on 9/15/25 at 8:30 a.m., identified the facility had not inform R1's family member that R1 did not receive her antibiotics and had missed 2 of 4 doses and nursing staff did not have access to retrieve emergency medications. R1's 8/25/25, Hospitalist Progress note identified R1 had a fall and obtained a hip fracture. On 9/2/25, while hospitalized R1 obtained a fever of 102 degrees (Fahrenheit). On 9/06/25, R1 had loose stools and was tested positive for clostridium difficile (C diff) (bacteria in the gut that causes severe diarrhea) on 9/06/25. R1's labs identified elevated white blood cell count (WBC) of 20.9. Vancomycin therapy was to start for R1's infection on 9/06/25 and had orders to continue administration of antibiotic therapy on R1's discharge summary. R1's September 2025, Medication Administration Record (MAR)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure residents received the care and assistance they needed in a timely manner for 3 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R4) reviewed for staffing. Findings include: R1 R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], identified R1 had intact cognition, no rejection of cares, and no behaviors. R1 required staff assist with dressing, bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R1 was frequently incontinent of bowel and urine and had pain almost constantly and received scheduled and as needed pain medication. R1's diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory condition that primarily affect the joints, causing pain, swelling and stiffness), anxiety, depression, pressure ulcer of left buttock, and polyneuropathy (disorder that damages the nerves and causes weakness, numbness, and burning pain). R1 also has one stage four pressure ulcer (extends into muscle, tendon, and ligaments, and can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, interview and observation, the facility failed to implement proper infection control when two nursing assistants were observed not following enhanced barrier precautions or hand hygiene during direct care for 3 of 5 (R2, R4, R5) residents reviewed for infection prevention.Findings include:Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents know to be infected with multi-drug resistant organisms as well as those at increased risk of multi-drug resistant organism acquisition (residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices)R2's face sheet dated 11/3/25, indicated R2 was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses of type II diabetes, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features and obesity.R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was severely cognitively impaired and had behavioral symptoms directed towards others. She was dependent on staff for all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to include the resident representative in development and implementation of the plan of care for one of one residents (R1) reviewed for residents rights.R1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, stroke, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body).R1's face sheet dated 8/28/25, included a contact for family member (FM)-A with the contact type of A/R Responsible Party and POA (power of attorney) Care.On 8/27/25 at 1:10 p.m., R1 was observed sitting in her power wheelchair with feet resting uncovered. Bilateral great toes (both big toes) were noted to have dark red, scab like appearance at base of toenail. No redness or drainage noted.R1's In-House Senior Services Consent form signed 4/16/21, included R1 would consent to podiatry in house.Provider order dated 7/30/25, included an order for a podiatry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,696 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,696 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $961K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN