No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Villas At Osseo LLC

501 Second Street Southeast, Osseo, MN 55369 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (763) 762-1800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation3 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$48,399 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $48,399 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-03)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
40 Central Ave · (763) 420-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8000 Lakeland Ave N · (763) 424-7077 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
312 Central Ave · (763) 425-3243 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Sipe Park0.1 mi
256 6th Ave SE · (763) 425-5741 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
710 Broadway St E · (763) 425-2238

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%18.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.7%4.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.1%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.6%20.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.2%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.4%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.4%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.4%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.9%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.0%82.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.8%23.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.5%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.321.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.361.901.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 128 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.0%CMS range 43.0–60.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.8–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.9–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.99
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
46.8%
Total nursing turnover
55.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 87.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-12)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure staff followed five rights of medication administration for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for significant medication errors. R1 received five times the prescribed dose of Methadone for three days (nine shifts) which impaired her speech, ability to verbalize needs and consume nutrition. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1. The IJ began on 4/26/25, when the facility staff administrating R1's medication failed to compare the written order on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) with the prescription label on the physical bottle of Methadone before administration which resulted in R1 receiving five times the prescribed dose of Methadone nine times over the course of three days. The IJ was identified on 5/7/25, and the administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/7/25 at 1:45 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 5/1/25, and the deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey and was therefore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to protect one of one residents (R4) from abuse and neglect when R4 was deprived of her care planned bed mobility and transfer needs, while she voiced pain and signs of distress, visibly struggled with these movement activities, and was placed in apparent unsafe laying and seated positions. These actions resulted in a fall for R4 where she sustained a distal femur fracture that required hospitalization and surgical intervention. The facility implemented corrective action based on their investigation and so the deficient practice was issued at an immediate jeopardy (IJ) past non-compliance. The IJ at F600 began on 1/17/25 (Friday), after R4 was deprived of care planned bed mobility and transfers, along with additional staff support, despite her voiced complaints of pain and signs of distress, visible struggles with these movement activities and placement in apparent unsafe laying and seated positions, and when transferred by staff in a non-care planned approach. This resulted in harm with required medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent an elopement (leaves premises or a safe area without authorization or necessary supervision) were provided to 1 of 3 residents (R1), who was at risk for elopement, utilized a wanderguard (elopement signaling device), and who had history of independent wanderguard removal. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when she left the facility without staff knowledge and was outside for approximately 30 minutes exposed to lower temperature weather and unsafe conditions. The facility implemented corrective action based on their investigation and so the deficient practice was issued at IJ, past non-compliance. The IJ began on 1/11/25 (Saturday), after R1 removed her wanderguard, exited the facility's front door, was outside for approximately 30 minutes in 17-degree weather, was not immediately assessed upon reentry to the facility, the provider, family, and managerial staff were not alerted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident abuse for 5 of 5 residents (R3, R5, R6, R7, & R8) reviewed when R1 had physically assaulted R3 and R5 and verbally assaulted all five residents resulting mental anguish and multiple police visits.Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1 did not exhibit any behaviors and did not refuse cares. R1 used a walker and/or a cane for ambulation. He was independent with eating, putting on and taking off footwear, personal hygiene, rolling in bed, sitting to lying and lying to sitting. He required set-up assistance with sitting to standing, dressing and toileting. R1's pertinent diagnoses were metabolic encephalopathy (the brain does not function normally because of a medical condition), hypokalemia (low potassium levels), alcohol dependence, nicotine dependence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for home like environment.Findings include: R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was not completed as R4 was only at the facility for approximately 24 hours. R4's nursing progress note dated 6/4/25 at 5:55 p.m. R4 was admitted from the hospital via emergency medical services accompanied by family member (FM)-A. R4 required assistance of one staff member for mobility and daily care needs. R4 was nonverbal. A video uploaded date of 6/5/26 at 10:30 a.m. revealed R4's window with two black ants crawling along the windowsill. A facility grievance form dated 6/8/26 indicated the date of Incident: 6/4/2026. Specific Location Where Incident Occurred: Resident room, entrance. Incident Description: Resident admitted to facility 6/4/26. Family members had complaints alleging that there was no staff to greet them immediately upon arrival. They expressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop the care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R1) review for care plan. R1 was placed on 1:1 staff supervision with specific interventions that were not on added to his care plan.Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1 did not exhibit any behaviors and did not refuse cares. R1 used a walker and/or a cane for ambulation. He was independent with eating, putting on and taking off footwear, personal hygiene, rolling in bed, sitting to lying and lying to sitting. He required set-up assistance with sitting to standing, dressing and toileting. R1's pertinent diagnoses were metabolic encephalopathy (the brain does not function normally because of a medical condition), hypokalemia (low potassium levels), alcohol dependence, nicotine dependence, personality disorder and altered mental status. R1's care plan dated 6/9/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the physician and or the resident representative timely for 2 of 3 residents (R1,R4) reviewed for change in condition. Findings include:R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R1's primary diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, acquired absence of right leg below knee (BKA), acute on chronic left lower extremity (LLE), rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor, and peripheral vascular disease.R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had no cognitive impairment and was receiving a pain medication.R1's care plan dated 5/8/26 identified a focus of alteration in comfort related to left lower extremity pain with staff interventions included providing non-medicinal forms of pain relief such as positioning, rest, massage, etc; administering pain medication as ordered by the provider, and documenting the effectiveness of the pain medication.On 5/21/26 at 6:55 a.m., R1's progress note indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide pain management in accordance with the resident's new physician's orders to a resident experiencing pain for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R1's primary diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, acquired absence of right leg below knee (BKA), acute on chronic left lower extremity (LLE), rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor, and peripheral vascular disease.R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had no cognitive impairment and was receiving pain medications.R1's care plan dated 5/8/26 identified a focus of alteration in comfort related to left lower extremity pain with staff interventions included providing non-medicinal forms of pain relief such as positioning, rest, massage, etc; administering pain medication as ordered by the provider, and documenting the effectiveness of the pain medication.R1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely transcribe the physician's new orders to initiate a pain management therapy for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R1's primary diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, right leg below knee amputation (BKA), acute on chronic left lower extremity (LLE), rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor, and peripheral vascular disease.R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had no cognitive impairment and was receiving a pain medication.R1's physician order dated 5/20/26 instructed:- to discontinue oxycodone 10 mg.- to administer hydromorphone (use to manage moderate to severe pain) 4mg per mouth (po) one time only for left foot pain.-to start hydromorphone 4 mg po every 4 hours as needed for left foot pain.R1's facility physician orders that were transcribed into electronic health record (EHR) did not include orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological (non-pharm) interventions were attempted/offered and documented prior to the administration of as needed (PRN) narcotic medications for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for pain. Findings include: R3's diagnoses list dated 2/6/26 included fracture of right femur (upper leg bone), hypotension (low blood pressure), and low back pain. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R3 did not have cognitive impairment. R3 had occasional pain that interfered with day-to-day activities, therapy, and sleep.R3's care plan dated 1/30/26 indicated a focus of alteration in comfort related to right femur fracture and low back pain with interventions included provide non-medicinal forms of pain relief such as positioning, rest, massage, etcetera (etc.).R3's provider order dated 1/30/26 instructed oxycodone-acetaminophen (a combination pain relieving medication) tablet 10-325 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet every 6 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately transcribed a physician order with a start date for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R2's diagnoses list dated 2/6/26 included gas gangrene (a bacterial infection) and foot ulcer (an open sore on the foot). R2's hospital discharge order dated 1/25/26 instructed new medication: amoxicillin-pot clavulanate (an antibiotic) 875-125 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet two times a day. Stop taking on 2/3/26. R2's physician order dated 1/25/26 was consistent with the hospital discharge order; amoxicillin-pot clavulanate 875-125 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet two times a day, stop taking on 2/3/26. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R2 did not have cognitive impairment. The MDS identified R2 was administered an antibiotic. R2's January and February medication administration records (MAR) identified the physician order for Amoxicillin however; the MARs identified a start date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct care conferences on a quarterly basis for 6 of 6 residents (R12, R14, R26, R27, R56, R70) reviewed for care planning. Additionally, the facility failed to update the care plan for 1 of 6 residents (R70) reviewed for communication and language preferences. Findings include: R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 was admitted on [DATE], moderately cognitively impaired, able to communicate clearly, and understand others, R12 had the following diagnoses: heart failure (HF) (heart pumps ineffectively), hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure), renal failure, neurogenic bladder (inability to control ones' bladder), and Alzheimer's. R12's care conference form dated 11/13/24, indicated a care conference took place one day after R12's admission, however, there was no other evidence of any other care conferences having been conducted. On 6/9/25 at 1:46 p.m , R12 reported they did not remember ever having a care conference, nor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 1 residents (R65) reviewed for dignity related to dressing. Findings Include: R65's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R65 was admitted on [DATE], was able to communicate clearly and understand others, was cognitively intact, and had the following diagnoses: bilateral (both sides) below the knee amputation, HTN, wound infection, diabetes, malnutrition, anxiety, depression, and asthma. On 6/9/25 at 3:14 p.m , R65 was observed sitting in bed wearing only a black and tan sweater, tan grippy socks over R65's bilateral stumps, and a brief. R65 stated he should have been wearing pants, but staff didn't complete the task. F65 was upset and stated, how can you treat an elderly person this way?. R65 and R65's daughter (FM)-A stated R65 was a dignified person and was embarrassed to be left this way and would have never chosen to not wear pants. On 6/12/5 at 11:48 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning of wheelchairs for 2 of 2 residents (R14, R13) reviewed for dignity. Findings Include: R14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], included R14 was cognitively intact. R14 utilized a wheelchair for mobility and required partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene. R14 had diagnoses of arthritis, abnormalities of the gait or mobility, and essential tremor. On interview on 6/10/25 at 9:22 a.m., R14 commented on the condition of her wheelchair. R14 stated the wheels were worn out and had gouges and divots out of them which caused the wheelchair to be difficult to be maneuvered by transportation company. R14 also stated the arm rests were missing chucks of covering black covering. R14 stated it had been years since her wheelchair was cleaned and had dirt on it. R13's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R13 was severely cognitively impaired, utilized a wheelchair for a mobility device, and required substantial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide assistance with grooming for 1 of 2 resident (R145) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: R145's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R145 was cognitively intact and required assistance with ADL's. R145 had diagnosis of acute kidney failure and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. R145's care plan dated 5/27/25, indicated. R145 required assistance with personal hygiene preferences. The care plan revealed R145 would be dressed and groomed per his preferences. During an observation on 6/9/25 at 3:02 p.m., R145 was lying in bed watching television. R145's beard and mustache were approximately one inch long. R145 stated the beard and mustache were long for him. R145 stated he would like it to be clean shaven, he would look better. An interview on 6/10/25 at 1:29 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A stated it was part of resident care to offer shaving. NA-A stated she did not offer R145 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in resident accessible areas. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with current physician-ordered administration instructions including medication name, and resident name. This unsafe practice had the potential to impact residents who received medications from the 100-unit medication cart. Findings include: During an observation on 6/11/25 at 8:22 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)A administered medications from the 100-unit medication cart to R26. LPN-A placed a blue cup with an unlabeled, undated medication syringe containing a clear liquid and an unlabeled, undated clear medication cup with a round tablet on R26's bedside table while LPN-A administered crushed medications. After R26 took the crushed medications she asked LPN-A what the medications on the bedside table were. LPN-A stated the syringe in the blue cup contained liquid methadone for pain and the pill was lorazepam. R26 shook her head no, and stated she did not want them. LPN-A then picked up the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Assessment and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) committee effectively sustained ongoing compliance related to repeat citations from past surveys regarding dignity, which was also identified during this survey. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents in the facility. Finding include: Review of the [NAME] Report 0003D Provider History Profile Report dated 5/16/25, indicated the facility was cited for F550 for dignity during the survey exited 9/24/24. See F550: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize professional interpretive services for 1 of 1 resident (R66) reviewed for oral communication. The facility's QAPI minutes dated 3/20/25, 4/17/25, and 5/15/25 lacked ongoing data related to the above repeat citation related to dignity concerns. On 6/12/25 at 1:22 p.m., the administrator stated the QAPI committee meets monthly, and they use standard monarch documentation to trend and identify problematic areas for opportunities to improve. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to complete proper hand hygiene during 2 of 3 dining observations. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents. Findings include: During dining observation on 6/10/25 at 8:16 a.m., director of nutrition (DN) completed hand hygiene with soap and water for about 5 seconds in the dining room serving area. During interview at 6/10/25 at 8:20 a.m., DN stated she washed her hands for approximately 10 seconds. DN stated she believed proper hand hygiene should take 15 seconds, but felt it was not an issue because she was not touching food, only checking temperatures and adjusting serving dishes in the steam table. During food prep observation on 6/12/25 at 10:05 a.m., dietary aide (DA)-A checked the chemical level on the dishwasher, washed hands with soap and water for 6 seconds, dried hands and replaced gloves. During observation and interview on 6/12/25 at 10:21 a.m., DA-B entered the kitchen, washed hands with soap and water for 7 seconds, put on gloves and started moving clean dishes to storage area. DA-B stated she should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R12, R61, and R65) were offered, educated on, and provided the pneumococcal vaccination series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), who were reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: A CDC Adult Immunization Schedule by age topic, dated 11/21/2024, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old had received the complete series (i.e., PPSV23 and PCV13; see below) then the patient and provider may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) for patients who had received Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) at any age and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23 (PPSV23) at or after [AGE] years old. R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 was admitted on [DATE], was able to communicate clearly and understand others, was moderately cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to notify resident representative timely following resident change of condition for 1 of 1 residents (R2) who had a weight loss of eight pounds in 27 days. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had cancer, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, seizure disorder and depression. The MDS indicated R2 was cognitively intact with no mood or behavior disorders, was independent with activities of daily living (ADL), including eating. R2's weight was 200 pounds (lbs) indicating, no weight loss with a therapeutic diet. R2's care plan (CP) dated 3/11/24, indicated nutritional problems or potential nutritional problems related to increased nutritional needs due to a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of left breast, increased protein needs, supplements discontinued by physician, weight stable for 180 days. The care plan directed staff to allow resident sufficient time to eat, evaluate weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement appropriate pain monitoring to ensure comfort for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for pain management and whom was non-verbal and unable to communicate their needs. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], had no MDS entries due to death on [DATE]. R1's care plan (CP) dated [DATE], indicated R1 received palliative care (focusing on improving quality of life for those with serious illnesses, during end-of-life care specifically focuses on the final months, weeks, or days of life), pneumonia, obesity due to excess calories, hypertension congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation and long term use of insulin. In addition, R1's CP indicated he received hospice services as of [DATE], and comfort cares as desired with verbalized satisfaction with cares received. Additionally, R1's CP indicated he had alteration in cognition, mobility, mood and comfort, and directed staff to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure side rails were comprehensively assessed to determine if they were appropriate and safe, discuss the risks and benefits, and obtain informed consent prior to use of bed rails for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) who were observed to have side rails raised on their beds. Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact R2 had cognition. Diagnoses included repeated falls, and type 2 diabetes with foot ulcer. R2 was independent with bed mobility and required substantial staff assistance for transfers. R2's care plan dated 1/10/25 indicated R2 required assistance with bed mobility, and was transferred with assist of two staff members and a mechanical standing lift. R2's care plan lacked information about bed rails. R2's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence a side rail assessment had been completed to determine necessity, and whether R2 could safely use side rails. Additionally, R2's EMR lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to communicate in a dignified manner to 1 of 1 residents (R2) reviewed for dignity. Finding include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had depression, paraplegia (inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body), hemiparesis ( one-sided muscle weakness) and hemiplegia (Muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles). The MDS further indicated R2 was cognitively intact, no behaviors and daily preferences were very important. In addition the MDS indicated R2 had impairment to upper and lower extremities on one side, needed maximum assistance with toileting, dressing, mobility and used a wheelchair. R2's Care Plan dated 10/24/24, indicated R2 was a smoker at the facility and was fall risk due to contracture to left ankle. The Care Plan further indicated R2 had a fall on 8/16/24, and staff were to accompany resident after meals to smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify resident representative timely following resident falls with injury for 1 of 1 residents (R3) who had been hospitalized twice from falls, one with hip fracture and then a neck fracture. Findings include: R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had diagnosis of dementia, had mild cognitive impairment, demonstrated no verbal or physical or verbal behaviors, and had no rejection of care episodes. The MDS indicated R3 required partial assistance with activities of daily living, had a fall since admission with no injury, had surgery involving the gastro intestinal (GI) track and received anti-psychotic medications. R3's Care Plan (CP) dated 11/07/24, indicated C3 was at risk for falls related to gall bladder surgery, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, muscles wasting and atrophy in shoulders, dementia. In addition the CP indicated R3 does ambulate self in room. The CP interventions included the following: -Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to complete the initial comprehensive assessment using direct observation and communication with the resident for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had diagnosis of dementia, had mild cognitive impairment, demonstrated no verbal or physical or verbal behaviors, and had no rejection of care episodes. The MDS indicated R3 required partial assistance with activities of daily living, had a fall since admission with no injury, had surgery involving the gastro intestinal (GI) track and received anti-psychotic medications. A Fall Review Evaluation dated 10/21/24, indicated R3 was admitted on [DATE], had a history of multiple falls, received narcotics, psychotropics. The Evaluation further indicated R3 exhibits loss of balance while standing, required bide base of support, frequently incontinent of urine, wandering less than daily and confined to chair daily.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to update the care plan with identified fall interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had diagnosis of dementia, had mild cognitive impairment, demonstrated no verbal or physical or verbal behaviors, and had no rejection of care episodes. The MDS indicated R3 required partial assistance with activities of daily living, had a fall since admission with no injury, had surgery involving the gastro intestinal (GI) track and received anti-psychotic medications. R3's Care Plan (CP) dated 11/07/24, indicated R3 was at risk for falls related to gall bladder surgery, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, muscles wasting and atrophy in shoulders, dementia. In addition the CP indicated R3 does ambulate self in room. The CP interventions included the following: -Physical therapy (PT) per orders -Follow PT and Occupational (OT) instructions for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: R1's Physician's Orders dated 8/21/24 directed to hold warfarin (generic name for Coumadin, a blood thinner) 8/21/24 and 8/22/24. Recheck INR (international normalized ratio, a lab test for blood clotting) on Friday 8/23/24. R1's August MAR indicated R1 did not receive Coumadin from 8/23/24 through 8/27/24. On 9/6/24 at 12:25 p.m., case manager (CM)-A stated licensed practical nurse (LPN)-C entered the order into the computer system incorrectly, which lead to the omission of the lab being completed as ordered. R1 missed Coumadin dosages 8/23/24 through 8/27/24. On 9/10/24 at 9:04 a.m., LPN-C stated she made an error when entering the lab order into the computer system, for R1's INR, causing it to be missed on 8/23/24. R2's Physician's Orders dated 9/4/24 directed to administer niacin (a form of vitamin B3) 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily in the morning. On 9/5/24 at 7:26 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices while conducting blood glucose checks for 2 of 4 patients (R1, R4) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R1's MDS admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. R1's Physician's Order dated 8/31/24, directed to check blood glucose before meals and at bedtime. On 9/6/24 at 11:41 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A placed a bin containing blood glucose testing supplies, including a shared glucometer, on the nightstand in R1's room. LPN-A placed the glucometer on the bed linens while she prepared R1's finger, then set the glucometer on the over-the bed table once she had the blood sample applied to the test strip. LPN-A removed the test strip and wiped the glucometer with an alcohol wipe, and immediately placed the glucometer back in the bin. LPN-A stated she was not aware of any other cleaning requirements for the glucometer other than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize professional interpretive services for 1 of 1 residents (R66) reviewed for oral communication. Findings include: R66's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included diagnosis of psychotic disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, and stroke. R66 was cognitively intact. R66 was listed as having pain frequently. R66's order summary report dated 8/22/24, included contact information for [NAME] Interpreter Services. Order included phone number, pin number for access, resident spoke Ukrainian, and to utilize as needed. R66's care plan dated 7/11/24, included resident has a risk for alterations in behavior due to trauma and PTSD. Care plan included to communicate via interpreter and to consider past trauma when engaging with the resident. Care plan included R66's primary language was Russian and to utilized translator app on phone to communicate. During interview on 8/19/24 at 5:01 p.m., R66 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a written notification of transfer and/or discharge was sent to the office of the Ombudsman for 1 of 4 (R30) reviewed for hospitalization and/or discharge. Findings include: R 30's significant change Minimum Data Sset (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R30's diagnoses included: high blood pressure, renal insufficiency (poorly functioning kidneys), diabetes, cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke), aphasia (difficulty understanding or expressing words), hemiplegia (weakness of one side of the body), anxiety, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (long-term obstruction of airways). R30's census list dated 8/22/24, indicated R30 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 5/10/24. R30's medical record lacked evidence a written notification of transfer/discharge was sent to the office of the Ombudsman for long term care. On 8/22/24 at 10:32 a.m., the administrator approached surveyor and provided a list of ombudsman notifications from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) was completed for 1 of 1 residents (R25) residents reviewed with a serious mental illness diagnosis. Findings include: R25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated indicated R25 had diagnoses to include anxiety disorder and schizophrenia (a chronic and sever mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). R25's medical record revealed a level I PASARR was completed on 5/12/23 prior to admission and indicated a PASARR level II was required before R25 admitted to a nursing facility. No level II PASARR was found. During interview on 8/22/24, at 8/:49 a.m. social worker (SW)2 stated the normal process included having a level II PASARR completed prior to admission. SW-2 stated she had not had any communication with the lead agency regarding a level II PASARR in several months and it was inappropriate to not have it completed prior to admission. During interview on 8/22/24, at 9:43 a.m. the administrator stated the social services team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, facility failed implement interventions to prevent further development of decreased range of motion and ability for 2 of 2 residents (R17, R51) reviewed for positioning and mobility. Findings include: R17's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included a primary diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a progressive neurological condition). R17's MDS included limited range of motion (ROM) on both upper and lower extremities and dependent for mobility. R17's admission record printed 8/22/24, included diagnosis of contracture of the left ankle and foot. During observation on 8/19/24, R17's feet were noted to not be resting on the wheelchair foot pedals. R17's left foot was noticeably turned inward. No brace or positioning device was observed. R17's physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], included recommendation R17 would benefit from daily stretches. A functional maintenance program was established, and staff were trained. R17's Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interview the facility failed to report to the State Agency (SA) a injury of a hematoma on right leg for 1 of 1 (R1) when reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Findings include: R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicted intact cognition (13)and diagnosis of acute kidney disease, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, need for assistance with personal care, type 2 diabetes mellitus, insomnia, delirium and, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hupercapnia and hypoxia. R1's incident report dated 7/9/24 indicated during AM cares, while the staff assisted the resident with transfer from bed to a wheelchair (W/C), the resident sustained a bruise on her left lower extremities (LLE). Reported indicated the Root cause as full body lift was defective and did not function properly, leading to the incident. Intervention indicated as the full-body lift was removed from the floor and dismantled by maintenance. Another full-body lift was rented.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin (hematoma on right leg) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicted intact cognition (13)and diagnosis of acute kidney disease, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, need for assistance with personal care, type 2 diabetes mellitus, insomnia, delirium and, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hupercapnia and hypoxia. R1's care plan dated 6/12/24, indicated R1 required assist of 2 staff with transfer using full body lift, incident on 7/9/24: during transfers, R1 will need 3 staff members. One will guide legs, one will control the machine, other will assist R1 with wheelchair positioning behind her. R1's progress note dated 7/12/24 indicated at about 10:10 a.m. nursing assistant (NA)-A notified registered nurse (RN)-A that R1 had a lump on her leg and was screaming in pain. R1 was assessed and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to allow a resident/resident's legal representative to participate in treatment decisions for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who was on hospice, had a seizure and was initially denied access to medical treatment at a hospital. Findings include: R1's minimum data status (MDS) undated, was not completed due to admit date of 3/06/2024 and discharge date of 3/09/2024. R1's Care Plan dated 3/07/24, indicated R1 had malignant carcinoid tumor of the sigmoid colon, restless leg syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of the rectum stage IV (The earliest stage of colorectal cancers is called stage 0 (a very early cancer), and then range from stages I (1) through IV (4)). In addition, R1's care plan indicated a coccyx wound on buttock staff were directed to turn and reposition every two hours with weekly skin inspections by a nurse. R1's care plan also indicated she had alteration in cognition and was forgetful, on hospice care related to diagnosis of stage IV metastatic rectal cancer, and resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a potential allegation of neglect was recognized and reported to the State agency (SA) in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's minimum data status (MDS) undated, was not completed due to admit date of 3/06/2024 and discharge date of 3/09/2024. R1's Care Plan dated 3/07/24, indicated R1 had malignant carcinoid tumor of the sigmoid colon and malignant neoplasm of the rectum stage IV (The earliest stage of colorectal cancers is called stage 0 (a very early cancer), and then range from stages I (1) through IV (4). Review of an email received by the Monarch Group on 3/10/24 at 1:42 a.m. indicated concerns related to the care of R1 for services provided during the date of 3/7/24-3/9/24. The email indicated a summary of the following: -Unsanitary room conditions -Unsafe room conditions (exposed electrical wiring) -bruising and bleeding in mouth related to forceful medication administration -wait times to use bathroom/delayed patient care times -patient rights concerns related to Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 10 of 10 residents (R2, R5, R7, R10, R11, R13, R16, R19, R20, R21) who were provided medications outside of ordered parameters by three staff on three separate units. Findings include: Resident Medication Admin Audit Reports identified the following medication order information for 4/2/24: -R7: 8:00 a.m. - metformin twice day (BID) with meals for diabetes (DM), metoprolol (cardiac), lorazepam (antianxiety) three times a day (TID), two antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia (haloperidol lactate and quetiapine fumarate), and two bowel medications. -R11: 8:00 a.m. - Lasix and Aldactone for edema, aspirin for stroke prevention, Breo Ellipta inhaler for COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)(chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and a bowel medication. -R13: 8:00 a.m. - vilazodone with a meal for schizoaffective disorder, metformin with meals BID for DM, glipizide for DM, gabapentin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure insulin (blood sugar regulator) medication was administered in accordance with physician orders for 4 of 4 residents (R9, R15, R18, R20) who were provided insulin outside of ordered parameters and manufacturer recommendations by two staff on two separate units. Findings include: Resident Medication Admin Audit Reports identified the following provider insulin and blood sugar (BS) orders and scheduled time frames for 4/2/24: -R9: Novolog per sliding scale, based on corresponding ordered BS readings, before meals and at bedtime (HS) for diabetes mellitus (DM). The lunchtime Novolog was scheduled for 11:30 a.m. and supper scheduled at 5:30 p.m. -R15: Lispro per sliding scale, based on BS Dexcom 7 (continuous glucose monitoring system) readings, with meals for DM. The morning Lispro was scheduled for 7:30 a.m. with lunch scheduled at 12:30 p.m. -R18: 1. Humalog per sliding scale, based on Libre BS sensor device readings, three times a day (TID) for DM with first dose scheduled for 7:00 a.m. and second…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for toileting and falls. Findings include: Vulnerable adult maltreatment report dated 2/22/24, indicated R1 was not provided with timely toileting. R1 face sheet identified R1 had diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, fall from bed, and unspecified fall. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitive and did not have behaviors. R1 required partial/moderate assistance to transfer on and off the toilet and was dependent for toileting hygiene. R1 was not on a toileting program and frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. R1's bladder evaluation dated 1/31/24, reviewed on 2/1/24. Identified R1 was not content of bladder and potential causes include weakness and limited mobility. R1 had functional incontinence (impaired mobility, manual dexterity impairment, lack of toilet or toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure safe transfers to prevent or mitigate the risk of falls and/or injury for 2 of 4 residents (R4, R1) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R4's face sheet identified R4 had diagnoses that included abnormalities of gait and mobility, dementia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and repeated falls. R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 was to walk with a walker. R4 required partial/moderate assistance to go from sit to stand. R4's care plan dated 8/31/23, identified R4 required assist with transfers with the use of sit-to-stand mechanical lift. R4's therapy note dated 2/6/24 identified R4 required several standing rest breaks throughout ambulation. R4 ambulates with shuffling festinating gait, was occasionally able to achieve foot clearance but not consistently. R4 required moderate assist to stand from wheelchair. R4's nursing assistant care guide undated provided on 2/29/24 by administrator identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the therapeutic recreational director TRD-(A) was trained or had demonstrated competency prior to assisting residents with transfers, locomotion on/off unit, dressing, and ambulation for 1 of 1 residents (R4) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R4's face sheet identified R4 had diagnoses that included abnormalities of gait and mobility, dementia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and repeated falls. R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 was to walk with a walker. R4 required partial/moderate assistance to go from sit to stand. R4's care plan dated 8/31/23, identified R4 required assist with transfers with the use of mechanical sit to stand lift. During observation on 2/29/24 at 9:02 a.m., R4 was walking out of the dining room with a four wheeled walker that had a seat. R4 stated to therapeutic recreation department director (TRD)-A My legs aren't working. TRD-A instructed R4 to sit on the seat of the four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly label and date food items removed from their original boxes, rotate food items prior to their expiration date, and reduce the risk of physical contamination of food related to poor personal hand hygiene which had potential to affect all 79 residents. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 9/5/23 at 11:42 a.m., the refrigerator in the kitchen contained a single container of Hormel hydrolyte thickened water which had a black, fuzzy substance on the bottom inside of the container. The container had 10/27 written on it. During interview on 9/5/23 at 12 p.m., the culinary services director (CD) stated they rotate everything in and out, so they know what food and items to use first. The CD stated 10/27 on the Hormel hydrolyte thickened water was the date the thickened water was delivered. However, was not sure when it was last used. During observation and interview on 9/5/23 at 12:07 p.m., the walk-in freezer contained: 1. Three unopened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident assessment and review (PASARR) level 2 had been completed for 1 of 1 resident (R22) reviewed for PASARR level 2. Findings include: R22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R22 had intact cognition and diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder. Facility document titled, Senior 'LinkAge Line dated 5/12/2023, indicated yes for R22 having a current diagnosis of a developmental disability or related condition. Yes for R22 having been considered to have a developmental disability or related condition. Yes for R22 to have cognitive or behavioral signs that would lead someone to suspect the presence of developmental disabilities or related conditions. Yes for R22 to have a current diagnosis of a mental illness. Yes for R22 needing supportive services or interventions due to mental illness to maintain functioning within the past two years. The document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to revised and update comprehensive care plan and assessments for 1 of 3 resident (R21) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R21's had intact cognition and diagnoses which included: Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, major depressive disorder, and heart failure. R2 required physical assistance from one staff for bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and bathing. R21's care plan printed 8/18/23, displayed all focus areas/goals and interventions were canceled/resolved on 8/18/23 and had a re-initiated date of 9/6/23. R21 had a 48-hour care plan initiated on 8/18/23, In Progress and never fully completed. During interview on 9/7/23, at 2:16 p.m., assistant director of nursing (ADON) stated the facility was in the process of updating resident's care plans to the new owner's care plans. ADON stated she received direction from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders, document for proper positioning and use of assistive devices for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for assessment. R1's Annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition (able to fully understand). Diagnoses of other neurological conditions (Issues with brain and spine) cerebral palsy (difficulty controlling muscles), and schizophrenia (twisted sense of reality). R1 was totally dependent of cares with impaired range of motion to both upper extremities (arms). R1's most recent orders with active date of 4/14/12 indicated to use a right upper extremity hand splint for contracture management (reducing painful muscle stiffening) Facility provided treatment administration record (TAR) for month of September 2023 failed to identify R1 refused to wear a splint or assistive device to either arm. On 9/6/23 at 5:48 p.m., R1 was in wheelchair after eating in the dining room. R1 lacked arm splint to either…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to have a current treatment order for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for physician orders. Findings include: R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnosis of Type II diabetes mellitus without complications. R2 required physical assistance from one staff for bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and bathing. R21's care plan dated 8/18/23, indicated diabetes mellitus and required monitoring of blood sugars per MD order. The electronic health record (EHR) indicated R21's blood sugars had been obtained twice daily from 8/25/23 through 9/7/23. However, lacked orders for blood sugar monitoring. During interview on 9/6/23 at 9:57 a.m., R21 stated the nurse checked her blood sugars. She was unaware why. R21 stated she had asked but no one had gotten back with an answer. During interview on 9/7/23 at 8:11 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated the blood sugar monitoring are displayed on the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate medical diagnosis for use of scheduled anti-psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (R33) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R33's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition (poor ability to understand), no hallucinations or delusions (Seeing a different reality) with diagnoses of medically complex conditions (more than one complicated medical diagnosis,) including Non-Alzheimer dementia (Poor brain and memory function), and transient ischemic attack (Stroke like event). R33 was identified as being on antipsychotics (Medications for preventing psychotic behaviors). R33's Care plan dated 4/5/23 indicated alteration in psychosocial well-being related to memory loss and medical diagnosis of unspecified dementia (Memory loss) without behavioral disturbance (disturbing behaviors), and to monitor for behaviors. R33 became physically aggressive at times,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, during 1 of 1 quarters (Quarter 2), reviewed for payroll based journal (PBJ). Findings include: Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705 identified the following dates triggered : 1/1, 1/2, 1/7, 1/8, 1/21, 1/22, 2/5, 3/18, 3/19 for failure to have licensed nurse coverage 24 hours per day and 1/7, 1/8, 1/21, 1/22, 2/5, 2/18, 2/25, 3/5, 3/18, 3/19 for no registered nurse (RN) hours. Daily postings on the above-mentioned dates identified licensed nursing staff including registered nurses had worked and therefore the data submitted in the PBJ to CMS was inaccurate. Interview on 9/7/23 at 9:26 a.m., staffing coordinator (SC) identified this was the first time (Quarter 2) the facility submitted information rather than the corporate office and there was a struggle with obtaining the necessary information from the staffing agencies. SC was not familiar or experienced with this process. Interview on 9/7/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$48,399 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-04-03
  • $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-01-24
  • $16,985 — penalty dated 2025-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 1 of 5Maplewood Rehabilitation CenterMaplewood, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Fairbault LLCFaribault, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Grand Rapids LLCGrand Rapids, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At St Paul LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Excelsior LLCExcelsior, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Lynnhurst LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Villas At BrookviewGolden Valley, MN 1 of 5The Villas At New BrightonNew Brighton, MN 1 of 5The Villas At RobbinsdaleRobbinsdale, MN 1 of 5The Villas At The CedarsSaint Louis Park, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Pines LLCVirginia, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Shores LLCTwo Harbors, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Woods LLCEveleth, MN 1 of 5Villas At Bryn Mawr LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5Bayside Manor LLCGaylord, MN 2 of 5Oaklawn Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 2 of 5Parmly On The Lake LLCChisago City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Chateau LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Fridley LLCFridley, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Roseville LLCRoseville, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Rush City LLCRush City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Twin Rivers LLCAnoka, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Foley LLCFoley, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Winsted LLCWinsted, MN 2 of 5The North Shore Estates LLCDuluth, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St Louis ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St PaulSaint Paul, MN 2 of 5The Villas At The ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5Bethany On The Lake LLCAlexandria, MN 3 of 5Laurels Peak Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 3 of 5Meeker Manor Rehablitation Center, LLCLitchfield, MN 3 of 5River Valley Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCRedwood Falls, MN 3 of 5The Estates At Bloomington LLCBloomington, MN 3 of 5The Estates At St Louis Park LLCSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RichfieldRichfield, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RosevilleRoseville, MN 4 of 5Lakeshore Rehabilitation Center LLCWaseca, MN 4 of 5Mala Strana Health Care, LLCNew Prague, MN 4 of 5Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati CenterSleepy Eye, MN

Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NIJ LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 01/01/2023
SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST32%since 01/01/2023
WBS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST26%since 01/01/2023
YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST26%since 01/01/2023
HALPERT, MARCIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL32%since 01/01/2023
JAFFA, NOAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR16%since 01/01/2023
LEGUM, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE26%since 01/01/2023
STERN, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER26%since 01/01/2023
MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING XII LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$951K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 5%Other / private 34%

This home reported $951K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,152per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$357per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245629. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next