No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maplewood Rehabilitation Center

1900 Sherren Avenue East, Maplewood, MN 55109 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 115 certified beds · (651) 770-1365 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (651) 770-1365 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Sep 20241 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2196 WHITE BEAR Ave N · (651) 704-0322 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2196 White Bear Ave N · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Cub0.3 mi
2390 White Bear Ave N · (651) 773-8558 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1705 Cope Ave E · (651) 705-6169 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2425 White Bear Ave N

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.9%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%4.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.5%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.4%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.0%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.4%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.7%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%82.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.2%23.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.3%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.531.611.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.341.901.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.1%CMS range 55.2–74.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.5–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.0–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.97
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
35.8%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 102.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement individualized interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who sustained fractures after a fall from bed, and required emergency medical care. Findings include: R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Falls CAA (Care Area Assessment) Worksheet, dated 11/6/24, identified R1 was diagnosed with vascular dementia, end stage chronic disease, diabetes, bipolar disorder, and pain syndrome. She required staff assistance and triggered falls related to daily scheduled antianxiety medications. She was free of falls in the past year. She was enrolled in hospice (end of life) care since 6/2022. R1 was non-ambulatory and was bed-bound. At times, R1 lacked verbal responses and was impacted by flexion contracture of the upper extremity. R1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment. R1 required overall dependence on staff for her activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were developed and implemented to address the use of blood-thinning medications for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2 and R3) reviewed.R1 R1's face sheet, printed 1/26/26, identified diagnoses of cerebral vascular accident (stroke) and dysphagia. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified moderate cognitive impairment, the need for a feeding tube, and receipt of antiplatelet medications. R1's physician's orders dated 1/6/26 identified the resident was to receive clopidogrel 75 mg via G-tube every morning and aspirin 325 mg via J-tube daily with a meal. According to the FDA-approved Plavix (clopidogrel) labeling, clopidogrel is an antiplatelet medication. The FDA-approved labeling warns that Plavix can cause bleeding which can be serious and can sometimes lead to death. The FDA-approved Plavix Medication Guide identifies signs and symptoms of bleeding, including blood in your urine (pink, red or brown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program effectively sustained ongoing compliance related to repeat citations for past surveys regarding provider notification of changes, care plan revisions, arrangement of hearing appointments, oxygen administration, and infection control practices. This had the potential to affect all 101 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Review of the facility Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER)-3 (assessment data was converted to quality measures [QM] to evaluate nursing home's performance) dated11/25/25, identified the following prior deficiencies by month and year. F580-Notify of Changes (Injury/Decline/Room, etc.) cited on prior survey 11/7/24. Cited at a scope and severity (S&S) of a D. F657-Care Plan Timing and Revision cited on prior surveys 10/2023 and 11/27/24. Cited both times at a scope and severity (S&S) of a D. F685-Treatment/Devices to Maintain Hearing/Vision cited on prior survey 11/7/24. Cited at a scope and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure toenail care was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R83) who was dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include:R83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R83 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses of intellectual disabilities, seizure disorder, and personality disorder. R83 had no rejection of cares and was dependent on staff for lower body dressing, including socks and shoes. R83's Therapy ADL communication form dated 10/31/25, indicated R83 was dependent of staff for clothing management.R83's provider order dated 8/16/26. Indicated R83 required a nurse skin check weekly. R83's weekly skin inspection dated 10/27/25, indicated R83 had a shower and R83's toenails did not require trimming. R83's weekly skin inspection dated 11/1/25, indicated R83 had a bed bath and R83's toenails were trimmed.R83's weekly skin inspection dated 11/8/25, indicated R83 had a shower and R83's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services to maintain or prevent decline in range of motion in accordance with their functional maintenance programs for 7 of 7 residents reviewed (R1, R4, R53, R55, R88, R108, and R109). Specifically, the facility failed to implement prescribed range of motion (ROM) exercises as outlined in residents' functional maintenance programs. In addition, the facility lacked a policy or procedure to ensure functional maintenance programs were implemented, communicated to direct care staff, and consistently monitored for completion. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for decreased mobility, increased contractures, pain, and decline in functional status. Findings include: R1's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, muscle weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, gout, morbid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy and dignity was maintained by ensuring personal medical equipment was not exposed to public view for 1 of 1 residents (R88) reviewed for resident rights. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter drainage bag was positioned discreetly while the resident was laying in his bed with the door opened to the main hallway. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the resident's dignity and privacy.Findings include:R88's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R88 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R88's diagnoses included cancer (abnormal cell growth), anemia (low red blood cells), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal failure (impaired kidney function), obstructive uropathy (blocked urine flow), diabetes mellitus (impaired blood sugar regulation), arthritis (joint inflammation), non-Alzheimer's dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible to 1 of 1 resident (R74) reviewed for call light accessibility. Findings include:R74's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, was able to express ideas and wants, used a wheelchair, was dependent on staff for dressing, hygiene, bathing, and transfers, and required substantial assistance with rolling in bed, sitting to lying in bed and lying to sitting on the side of the bed, and was always incontinent.R74's Falls care area assessment (CAA) dated 10/22/25, indicated R74 had no falls, however, was at risk for falls due to decreased mobility and strength and planned to continue with the care plan.R74's care sheet indicated in a pink banner that all nursing assistants were expected to assist with all call lights. R74's care plan dated 4/11/23, indicated R74 was alert and oriented to person.R74's care plan dated 4/10/23, indicated R74's goal was to have no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in interview and record review the facility failed to ensure notification was made to the provider and resident representative for concerns of toenail infection and refused podiatry appointments for 1 of 1 resident R83 who required podiatry services. Furthermore, the facility failed to promptly notify the resident's physician and/or practitioner of changes in resident condition for 2 of 2 residents (R53 and R55) reviewed for notification of changes. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the provider of episodes of diarrhea for 1 resident (R53) reviewed for constipation and failed to notify the provider of significant weight gain in accordance with physician-ordered parameters for 1 resident (R55). These deficient practices had the potential to delay medical evaluation and treatment. Findings include: R83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R83 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses of intellectual disabilities, seizure disorder, and personality disorder. R83 had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of resident personal and medical information for 1 of 1 resident observed (R98) by allowing resident-identifiable information to be visible on a computer screen located on a medication cart in a public area. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unauthorized disclosure of protected health information to residents, staff not involved in care, visitors, and others who walked through the area.Findings include:R98's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R98 had intact cognition and was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs). R98's diagnoses included heart failure (impaired heart pumping function), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (impaired blood glucose regulation), renal failure (impaired kidney function), and anxiety disorder (persistent excessive anxiety).During observation on 12/2/25 from 9:26 a.m. to 9:34 a.m., the surveyor observed a medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (R55 and R108) by failing to ensure resident room floors were kept clean and free of visible dirt and debris. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for infection transmission, unpleasant living conditions, and compromised resident comfort and dignity.Findings include:R55R55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R55 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R55's diagnoses included heart failure (impaired heart pumping function), hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (elevated blood cholesterol), schizophrenia (chronic thought disorder), pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale (blood clot in the lung without acute heart strain), hypoxemia (low blood oxygen levels), thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of the left upper extremity (blood clot in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect anticoagulation status for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for coding accuracy. Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual version 1.20.1 dated 10/2025, indicated under a heading, Coding Instructions not to code antiplatelet medications such as clopidogrel as N0415E, an anticoagulant. R2's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 had a stroke, coronary artery disease, and hypertension. Further, a section, N0415 High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication directed staff to check whether a resident took any medications by pharmacological classification, not how it is used, during the last 7 days or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days. The MDS indicated R2 took an anticoagulant, and the indication was noted. Additionally, the MDS indicated R2 took an antiplatelet. - 10/22/25, clopidogrel bisulfate (an antiplatelet medication used to prevent blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care plans were developed, implemented, and revised to accurately reflect resident's current needs for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (R55, R102, and R109). Specifically, the facility failed to include required interventions for edema management, failed to update the care plan to remove discontinued enhanced barrier precautions, and contained conflicting information regarding the level of assistance required for eating. These deficient practices resulted in the potential for inconsistent care, unmet resident needs, and compromised resident safety and well-being.Findings include:R55R55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R55 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R55's diagnoses included heart failure (impaired heart pumping function), hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (elevated blood cholesterol), schizophrenia (chronic thought disorder), pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) related to hygiene and grooming were provided in accordance with resident needs for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R88) by failing to ensure the resident wore clean clothing throughout the survey period. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for compromised dignity, discomfort, and negative psychosocial impact to the resident.Findings include:R88's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R88 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R88's diagnoses included cancer (abnormal cell growth), anemia (low red blood cells), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal failure (impaired kidney function), obstructive uropathy (blocked urine flow), diabetes mellitus (impaired blood sugar regulation), arthritis (joint inflammation), non-Alzheimer's dementia (cognitive decline not due to Alzheimer's disease), urinary retention (inability to fully…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided or offered in accordance with resident needs and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R109). Specifically, the resident remained in bed for the duration of the survey without activities being offered or provided. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for social isolation, decline in psychosocial well-being, and decreased quality of life.Findings include:R109's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R109 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R109's diagnoses included hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side (paralysis or weakness on the right side due to stroke), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (impaired blood glucose regulation), hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol or fats in the blood), malnutrition (insufficient nutrient intake), bipolar disorder (mood disorder with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure audiology appointments were available for 1 of 1 resident (R67) who requested audiology services. Findings include:R67's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R67 had adequate hearing and had no difficulty in normal conversation, social interaction, listening to the TV and did not wear a hearing aid. Further, R67 had moderate cognitive impairment, was very important to have family or a close friend involved in discussion about care and was very important to listen to music.R67's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R67 had adequate hearing and did not use a hearing aid, had moderate cognitive impairment, and had initially been admitted to the facility on [DATE].R67's Medical Diagnosis form, undated, indicated the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease, dementia, and depression. R67's HealthDrive consent form dated 1/31/24, indicated R67 wanted to be seen for audiology.R67's HealthDrive consent form dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention was administered or reported as refused for 1 of 2 residents (R47) reviewed for recurring UTIs. Findings include:R47's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R47 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for toileting and required substantial/maximum assistance for transfers and mobility. The MDS indicated R47 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, did not have any urinary device. R47 did not exhibit rejection of care behavior. R47's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and urinary tract infection.R47's care plan dated 1/13/26, indicated alteration in elimination with a goal to be free from signs and symptoms of UTI.R47's October 2025, medication administration record (MAR) indicated, Estradiol Vaginal Cream 0.1 MG/GM (milligrams/gram)[Estradiol Vaginal] Apply to inner vulvar & urethral topically one time a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure specific patient centered orders were in place and implemented for colostomy care for 1 of 1 resident (R81) reviewed for colostomy care. Findings include:R81's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, did not have hallucinations or delusions, did not reject care, used a wheelchair, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, showering or bathing, and lower body dressing. Additionally, R81 had an colostomy and diagnoses included unspecified dementia, anxiety, depression, and malnutrition and did not have any skin conditions. R81's Physician's Orders form saved on 12/1/25 at 2:05 p.m., indicated the following orders:7/28/23, and discontinued on 8/1/23, left lower quadrant colostomy remove pouch and discard. Cleanse the peristomal skin with only tap water, pat dry. Apply [NAME] number 8664, 1 1/4 inch precut convex drainable pouch. Have the resident hold her hand over the pouch for a few minutes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with physician orders and professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R109). Specifically, the facility administered oxygen therapy without a physician's order. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for improper oxygen administration, respiratory compromise, and harm to the resident.Findings include:R109's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R109 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R109's diagnoses included hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side (paralysis or weakness on the right side due to stroke), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (impaired blood glucose regulation), hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol or fats in the blood), malnutrition (insufficient nutrient intake), bipolar disorder (mood disorder with manic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records for 3 of 3 residents (R47, R68, R83) reviewed who had inaccurate documentation. Findings Include: Findings include: R47 R47's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R47 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for toileting and required substantial/maximum assistance for transfers and mobility. The MDS indicated R47 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, did not have any urinary device. R47 did not exhibit rejection of care behavior. R47's diagnoses included dislocation of left patella (kneecap), chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and urinary tract infection. R47's care plan dated 1/13/26, indicated alteration in elimination with a goal to be free from signs and symptoms of UTI. R47's October 2025, medication administration record (MAR) indicated, Estradiol Vaginal Cream 0.1 mg (milligram)/GM (Gram) [Estradiol Vaginal] Apply to inner vulvar & urethral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures were in place for maintaining a central line with dressing changes and use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) with personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 2 residents (R36) reviewed who had a central line indwelling device.Findings include:R36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R36 had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximal assistance for most activities of daily living (ADL) and transfers. R36's diagnoses include spastic hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the right, dominant side, osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), and history of traumatic brain injury. R36's care plan (CP) dated 10/8/25, indicated resident was on EPB related to IV (central line). The CP instructed staff to use appropriate PPE when providing high contact cares. R36's CP indicated EBP was resolved 11/3/25. R36's treatment administration record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's primary medical provider was notified of changes in condition for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who exhibited increased pain and extremity swelling after a fall, which required x-ray services, along with failure to ensure a physician order was acted upon for R1 after she returned from the emergency department (ED).Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment. R1's diagnoses included, but not limited to, diabetes, stroke, malnutrition, depression, bipolar disorder, chronic pain syndrome, insomnia, and vascular dementia. Additionally, R1 continued with hospice care. She was administered scheduled pain medication during the five days of the assessment period; however, no PRN medications and/or non-medication interventions for pain. R1 was unable to participate in the pain questionnaire and staff interview(s) indicated R1 lacked indicators of pain, or possible pain, during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented with the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact resident care activities for 1 of 1 residents (R39) who had a central line, 1 of 1 residents (R38) who had wound dressings changed, and 1 of 3 residents (R11) observed during personal cares. The facility also failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was utilized for 1 of 2 residents (R38) observed during personal cares, and failed to ensure shared resident equipment was disinfected between uses for 1 of 1 residents (R3) observed for shared equipment. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure re-usable ice packs for clinical use were stored separately from food storage in 3 of 3 kitchen refrigerators. Findings include: R39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, no rejection of care or behaviors, partial/moderate assistance needed for upper body dressing and supervision for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a multi-resident shower room ceiling exhaust fan was cleaned. This had the potential to affect all residents on the third floor who used the shower room. Findings include: R71's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition. A Monthly Deep Clean Schedule form undated, indicated the 3rd floor long-term care north and south unit spa/bathrooms were deep cleaned on day 6 of the month. A Deep Clean Calendar dated October 2024, indicated spas were scheduled to be cleaned on 10/6/24. A November 2024 Deep Clean Calendar form was not provided. A procedure, undated, Deep Clean Procedures, indicated to check the posted deep clean schedule and clean the scheduled deep clean room. Further, the procedure directed staff to wipe the top and all sides of heating units and check top vents for accumulation of dust or other debris for resident rooms and to use a high duster to clean vents in restrooms. During interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to determine their own healthcare decisions for 1 of 1 resident (R30), and failed to ensure R30 had a right to revoke a power of attorney. Findings include: According to Minnesota Statutes 145C.06, a health care directive is effective for a health care decision when it meets the requirements of section 145C.03, subdivision 1; and the principal in the determination of the attending physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or physician assistant of the principal, lacks decision making capacity to make the health care decision; or if other conditions for effectiveness otherwise specified by the principal have been met. A health care directive is not effective for a health care decision when the principal , in the determination of the attending physician, advanced practice registered nurse, or physician assistant of the principal, recovers decision -making capacity; or if other conditions for effectiveness otherwise…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for 1 of 1 resident (R18) who was experiencing new vision loss. Findings include: R18's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension (HTN), and congestive heart failure (CHF). It further indicated R18 had adequate vision and didn't wear corrective lenses. R18's care plan dated 4/1/24, indicated adequate vision, able to read 12 point font, and does not wear glasses with an intervention to observe for signs and symptoms of changes in visual status and to notify the medical doctor (MD) if noted. R18's visit summary note from his last eye exam dated 7/30/24, indicated to schedule an appointment with a local retinal specialist/ophthalmology as soon as possible (ASAP) for evaluation and treatment. R18's physician's orders dated 11/6/24, indicated R18 had an appointment on 11/21/24 at 9:00 a.m. to see the retina…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to care conferences for 1 of 1 resident (R30) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R30's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, did not have evidence of an acute change in mental status, did not have inattention, disorganized thinking, or an altered level of consciousness, did not have physical, verbal, or other behaviors, was not important at all to have a family or close friend involved in discussions about care and had the following diagnoses: anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia, anxiety, depression, borderline personality disorder, and personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders. R30's Profile form in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R30's FM-A was her financial power of attorney (POA) and next to the heading, Power of attorney-care indicated, Do Not Use. R30's medical record was reviewed and lacked information R30 had a guardian.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure swallow study referral discharge needs were identified in the post-discharge plan for 1 of 1 resident (R54) reviewed for discharge. Findings include: R54's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of type one diabetes mellitus (DM1), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), heart failure, hypertension, kidney disease and depression. R54 was on a therapeutic diet and active discharge planning was place. R54's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 9/25/24, identified functional abilities (self-care and mobility) was triggered. R54 was admitted with poorly controlled DM1, end stage renal disease on dialysis, dysphagia, weakness, and muscle spasms. Physical, occupational and speech therapy were to evaluate. R54 had a history of noncompliance with medications and was at risk for decline related to medication noncompliance and diabetic complications. R54's care plan dated 9/13/24, identified the goal was to return to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment to maintain vision for 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed for vision services. Findings include: R18's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension (HTN), and congestive heart failure (CHF). It further indicated R18 had adequate vision and didn't wear corrective lenses. R18's care plan dated 4/1/24, indicated adequate vision, able to read 12 point font, and does not wear glasses with an intervention to observe for signs and symptoms of changes in visual status and to notify the medical doctor (MD) if noted. R18's visit summary note from his last eye exam dated 7/30/24, indicated to schedule an appointment with a local retinal specialist/ophthalmology as soon as possible (ASAP) for evaluation and treatment. R18's physician's orders dated 11/6/24, indicated R18 had an appointment on 11/21/24 at 9:00 a.m. to see the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident was adequately assessed for safe smoking for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for smoking. In addition, the facility failed to ensure an identified safety hazard was acted upon for 1 of 2 residents (R50) reviewed for resident to resident abuse. Findings include: R15's PPS (prospective payment system) Part A-Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R15 was cognitively intact, was independent or required supervision with most activities of daily living (ADLs), used intermittent oxygen therapy, and required a wheelchair for mobility. R15's diagnoses included hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (nerve condition causing tingling, swelling or muscle weakness), and chronic respiratory failure. R15's care plan last updated prior to survey start on [DATE], indicated R15 smoked independently, agreed to wear a smoking apron, and required smoking material to be stored in the treatment cart. The care plan further indicated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure supplemental oxygen was properly maintained and accurately documented per professional standards for 1 of 1 resident (R20). Findings include: R20's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R20 had intact cognition and the following diagnoses: pulmonary embolism (a blockage in the lung artery) without acute cor pulmonale (enlarged right ventricle due to a lung condition), enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, and unspecified dyspnea. R20's Physician Orders form indicated the following orders: • 8/26/24, monitor for skin breakdown around the nose and behind the ears caused by oxygen tubing every shift. • 8/27/24, and discontinued on 10/29/24, staff to follow enteric contact precautions (measures that are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment) due to C. Difficile (a bacteria that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R5 and R20) were offered and/or provided updated vaccinations for pneumococcal disease in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) vaccination recommendations. Findings include: R5's Resident Information form dated 11/7/24, identified she was admitted on [DATE], and was currently [AGE] years old with diagnoses which increased the risk of pneumococcal disease including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure and history of acute respiratory failure. R5's undated Immunizations form identified the PCV-13 and PPSV23 were given on 2/23/15. R5's vaccine consent form dated 9/7/24, identified she consented to receive the pneumococcal vaccines per primary care provider order and CDC guidelines. The CDC's PneumoRecs VaxAdvisor for Vaccine Providers dated 9/12/24, identified based on R5's age and vaccine history: though the vaccines were considered complete, based on shared clinical decision-making, decide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed who reported an allegation of sexual abuse in the facility. Findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia, traumatic brain injury, seizure disorder, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and encounter for palliative care. R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all hygiene cares, mobility, and transfers. R1's care plan focus dated 5/24/24, identified R1 as a vulnerable adult. It included an intervention dated 5/24/24, the local ombudsman, adult protection, police, and/or state/financial agencies will be notified of any suspected abuse or financial exploitation as needed. Nursing Home Incident Report #357954 submitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor edema and comprehensively assess non-pressure related wounds for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed. Findings Include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of brain (brain cancer), hypertension, and chronic ischemic heart disease (weakening of the heart caused by reduced blood flow) and was receiving hospice care. R2's active physician order dated 2/19/24, directed nurses to chart R2's condition in nurse's notes every shift for edema (fluid retention in body tissues that can result in swelling and/or weight gain) checks noting edema as present or not present and lung checks noting lungs as clear or not clear. R2's treatment administration records (TAR) were reviewed in conjunction with progress notes and skin evaluations, it was not evident edema was consistently comprehensively evaluated. Although the TAR's which identified the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nursing cares in a sufficient amount of time for ten of ten residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10) reviewed for call light times. R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10 depend on staff for assistance in their activities of daily living and there are delays in cares during to these call light times. Findings include: R1's admission record printed on 2/1/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder bipolar type and obesity. Additional pertinent diagnoses include morbid obesity, urge incontinence, limitation of activities due to disability, dependence on wheelchair, and muscle weakness. R1's care plan completed on 7/11/23 indicated R1 needs an assistance of one staff with dressing, grooming, and toileting, extensive assistance with bathing, and wears disposable briefs. R1's care plan indicated the prompt response by staff to all requests for assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of three of ten residents (R3, R6, R8) reviewed when residents were left soiled in their incontinent brief for extended periods of time. Findings include: R3's admission record printed on 2/1/24 states R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of heart failure. An additional pertinent diagnosis includes the absence of left foot. R3's Patient Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Recommendations assessment dated [DATE] indicated R3 was dependent upon staff for lower body dressing and toileting. The assessment does not indicate how many staff R3 is dependent upon for lower body dressing and toileting. The assessment indicated R3 was dependent upon two staff members for bed mobility and transfers using a EZ Lift (Hoyer). R3's Bowel and Bladder Data Collection assessment dated [DATE] indicated R3 is always incontinent of his bowels. The assessment indicated his bowel incontinence is managed using disposable briefs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was reviewed and provided timely to ensure knowledge of care and promote person-centered care planning for 1 of 2 residents (R24) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R24's face sheet undated, indicated R24 admitted to the facility 9/11/23, was readmitted to the hospital on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] R24's admission cognition assessment dated [DATE], indicated R24 was cognitively intact. R24's diagnoses list dated 9/11/23, indicated R24's diagnoses included spinal stenosis cervical region, diabetes mellitus, occlusion and stenosis of left carotid artery, and cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) R24's baseline care plan initiated 9/12/23, included pain, psychotropic medications, respiratory diagnosis, and skin with no interventions listed. During interview on 10/26/23 at 12:20 p.m., R24's significant other (SO) indicated he had not received any information regarding R24's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R54) reviewed for ongoing medication refusals. Findings include: R54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R54 had cognitive impairment and rejection of care which occurred one to three days in a seven day period. R54's face sheet printed 10/23/23, indicated diagnosis of major depressive disorder recurrent (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; the feeling of being extremely worried or nervous more frequently about things, even when there is little or no reason to worry about them), dissociative and conversion disorder (mental health conditions that can occur together. Dissociative disorders cause a person to become disconnected from important aspects of their lives. Conversion disorder causes physical symptoms that mimic neurological conditions), and personal history of transient ischemic attack ( a stroke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor skin conditions for 1 of 1 resident (R238) who had facial bruising upon admission. The facility also failed to ensure physician's orders were accurately transcribed for 1 of 1 resident (R13)reviewed who required follow-up care after skin excisions. Findings include: R238's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of displaced fracture of the second cervical vertebra, osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, chronic pain syndrome, and syncope (fainting) and collapse. It further indicated R238 required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), dependent on staff for transfers and mobility and had a fall with fracture prior to admission. R238's admission/readmission (day 1) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R238 had facial bruising under her right eye. R238's nursing weekly skin checks dated 10/15/23 and 10/22/23 lacked documentation of the bruise under her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place for 1 of 2 residents (R12) at risk for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 was cognitively impaired, required two person total assistance for most activities of daily living (ADLs) and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and had two stage II ulcers (partial thickness lost of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough. may also present as an intact or open/ruptured serum filled blister) and one stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss. subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed). R12's diagnosis included end stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, obesity, diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, and anemia. R12's care plan printed 10/26/23, indicated R12 had alteration in skin integrity related to mobility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record reflected accurate care and monitoring of the dialysis access site for 1 of 1 residents (R23) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: R23's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, no rejection of care and diagnoses of kidney failure and dialysis dependency. R23 required substantial/maximal assistance with upper body dressing. R23's Care Plan dated 4/21/22, identified a dialysis shunt location (central line) in the right upper chest. Interventions included no blood draws from central line, and in emergency situations if shunt started to bleed, apply ice and pressure, if bleeding does not cease after 15 minutes, call 911, doctor, dialysis and family. The care plan lacked interventions related to a dialysis fistula such as removing a pressure dressing after dialysis session, assessment of bruit and thrill (sounds and vibrations that indicated a fistula worked properly), and to ensure no blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to assess for and identify potential triggers for 1 of 1 resident (R28) who had a history of trauma. Findings include: R28's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, no rejection of care and diagnoses of depression, bipolar disease and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). R28 had several days in the lookback period where he felt little interest or pleasure in doing things or felt down, depressed, or hopeless. R28's Mood/Trauma care plan dated 7/25/18, identified a diagnosis of PTSD. Interventions included to call 911 in an urgent situation, complete a suicide self-harm interview as needed, remove items resident threatens to kill himself with, implement Threats to Self Harm policy and 1:1 checks, refer to psychologist as needed and encourage to express feelings and utilize family. The care plan lacked identification of triggers which had the potential to re-traumatize. R28's Social Services Resident History, Demographics…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic medications had appropriate monitoring, diagnosis, and indication for use for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R15's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicates a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, and R15 had an indwelling urinary catheter. R15's hospital progress plan note dated 8/9/23, had the order to continue Bacitracin three times daily to reduce catheter irritation. R15's provider orders (after visit summary) dated 8/11/23, included the medications Bacitracin (topical antibiotic ointment) and cefpodoxime (oral antibiotic). R15's order summary report printed 10/26/23, included provider orders since 8/1/23, which did not include an order for Bacitracin. However, the follow-up visit dated 9/5/23, included Bacitracin for catheter care. R15's treatment administration record (TAR) for October 2023, has Bacitracin for catheter care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement protocols to ensure appropriate antibiotic treatment was in place for 1 of 1 resident (R15) with an active infection. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and documentation of prophylactic antibiotic use for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. R15's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, and R15 has an indwelling urinary catheter. R15's provider orders (after visit summary) dated 8/11/23, included the medications Bacitracin and cefpodoxime (oral antibiotic), and follow-up visit dated 9/5/23, included Bactrim and Bacitracin. R15's medication administration record (MAR) for October 2023, revealed administration of Bactrim twice daily for 10 days, Diflucan (an antifungal), and continuation of Bacitracin three times daily with catheter care. R15's care plan printed 10/26/23, indicated a self-administration of medication plan started…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 44 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Fairbault LLCFaribault, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At Grand Rapids LLCGrand Rapids, MN 1 of 5The Emeralds At St Paul LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Excelsior LLCExcelsior, MN 1 of 5The Estates At Lynnhurst LLCSaint Paul, MN 1 of 5The Villas At BrookviewGolden Valley, MN 1 of 5The Villas At New BrightonNew Brighton, MN 1 of 5The Villas At Osseo LLCOsseo, MN 1 of 5The Villas At RobbinsdaleRobbinsdale, MN 1 of 5The Villas At The CedarsSaint Louis Park, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Pines LLCVirginia, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Shores LLCTwo Harbors, MN 1 of 5The Waterview Woods LLCEveleth, MN 1 of 5Villas At Bryn Mawr LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5Bayside Manor LLCGaylord, MN 2 of 5Oaklawn Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 2 of 5Parmly On The Lake LLCChisago City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Chateau LLCMinneapolis, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Fridley LLCFridley, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Roseville LLCRoseville, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Rush City LLCRush City, MN 2 of 5The Estates At Twin Rivers LLCAnoka, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Foley LLCFoley, MN 2 of 5The Gardens At Winsted LLCWinsted, MN 2 of 5The North Shore Estates LLCDuluth, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St Louis ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 2 of 5The Villas At St PaulSaint Paul, MN 2 of 5The Villas At The ParkSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5Bethany On The Lake LLCAlexandria, MN 3 of 5Laurels Peak Health Care, LLCMankato, MN 3 of 5Meeker Manor Rehablitation Center, LLCLitchfield, MN 3 of 5River Valley Health And Rehabilitation Center LLCRedwood Falls, MN 3 of 5The Estates At Bloomington LLCBloomington, MN 3 of 5The Estates At St Louis Park LLCSaint Louis Park, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RichfieldRichfield, MN 3 of 5The Villas At RosevilleRoseville, MN 4 of 5Lakeshore Rehabilitation Center LLCWaseca, MN 4 of 5Mala Strana Health Care, LLCNew Prague, MN 4 of 5Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati CenterSleepy Eye, MN

Showing 40 of 44; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MONARCH HEALTHCARE OPERATING XIV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/31/2023
NIJ LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2023
SPARTAN HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2023
WBS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2023
YAZOMA HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2023
HALPERT, MARCIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2023
JAFFA, NOAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2023
LEGUM, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2023
STERN, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2023
GREENBERG, JOSEPHIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/31/2023
GOODREID, MACKENZIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/21/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$343K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 7%Other / private 38%

This home reported $343K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$456per resident / day
operating cost
$13,857per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$451per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245276. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next