The Estates At Delano LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 33.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-01-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided consistent with professional standards of practice and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 2 residents (R131 and R14) reviewed for pain managment. This deficient practice caused actual harm for R131, who experienced unmanaged pain, disturbed sleep patterns and who had reports of pain. Findings include: R131's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated , 9/23/23, identified resident admitted to the facility 9/22/23 from an acute care hospital for aftercare following surgery on the nervous system and diagnoses of spondylolisthesis lumbar region (a spinal disorder in which a vertebra slips forward onto the bone below it), radiculopathy lumbar region (a pinched nerve), spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal that can put pressure on the spinal cord and nerves within the spine), chronic pain and muscle weakness. R131 had clear speech, the ability to make herself understood and had clear comprehension.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minnesota Ombudsman Office was informed of residents discharging against medical advice (AMA) for 2 of 3 residents (R37 and R38) who were reviewed for discharge from the facility.Findings include - R37: R37's electronic medical record (EMR) documented the following diagnoses: multiple fractures of ribs, left side subsequent to a motor vehicle accident, acute pain from trauma and muscle weakness. R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged against medical advice on 10/01/25, after not returning from an leave of absence (LOA). Review of R37's progress notes documented the following: > 9/30/2025 [9:45 p.m.] Writer was told in report resident was on LOA and will be back, around 9PM resident was not available, writer called resident phone and left a voicemail for resident to call facility> 10/01/2025 11:00 a.m., [business office manager] resident and left called a VM regarding his failure to return from LOA. Resident signed out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure there were orders and interventions in place for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine usage for 1 of 1 residents (R16) reviewed for CPAP therapy. Findings include: R16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R16 was cognitively intact and required assistance with all cares. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic respiratory failure and asthma. R16's care plan initiated 7/9/25, identified R16 had an alteration in oxygen/gas exchange, respiratory status related to sleep apnea and chronic respiratory failure. Interventions included CPAP at bedtime for sleep apnea. R16's physician orders dated 11/17/25 failed to indicate orders to wear CPAP machine at night, clean CPAP mask and tubing or to replace CPAP supplies. On 11/17/2025 at 11:12 a.m., R16's CPAP machine was observed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure there were orders in place for Dexcom sensor (a wearable Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) system for people with diabetes) for 1 of 3 residents (R16) reviewed for Dexcom use. In addition the facility failed to ensure orders were in place to remove pressure dressing (bandage applied to stop bleeding) after dialysis (medical procedure filters and removes waste from blood) for 1 of 1 residents (R16) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: R16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R16 was cognitively intact and required assistance with all cares. In addition the MDS indicated R16 received dialysis. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic respiratory failure and asthma. Review of R16's progress notes identified nurses had replaced R16's Dexcom sensor on 9/23/25, 10/4/25, 10/17/25 and 11/17/2025. R16's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an abuse protection plan was documented and all staff were educated on the plan for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for sexual abuse. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated severe cognitive impairment with diagnoses including convulsions and Alzheimer's disease. R1's care plan dated 10/14/24 indicated R1 was a vulnerable adult with a goal of remaining free from abuse and/or neglect. An additional goal was added 1/7/24 directing R1 would be kept safe from other residents, and not be left alone with any other residents without staff supervision. R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated severe cognitive impairment with diagnoses including dementia. R2's care plan indicated he was at risk for alteration in mood and behavior related to dementia. On 1/3/25 at 8:30 p.m., R1's incident note indicated R1 and R2 were sitting in their wheelchairs in the common area. At 8:30 p.m., another resident alerted staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to law enforcement as required for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and post traumatic stress disorder. Identified R1's cognition was intact. R1's care plan dated 10/23/24, revealed R1 required assistance of one to two staff members for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting. Review of facility report number 358352 to the State Agency (SA) dated 10/21/24 at 12:40 p.m., revealed R1 reported nursing assistant (NA)-A came into her room to assist R1 with brief change and while wiping R1's bottom, R1 reported feeling NA-A place her hand in R1's vagina. R1 reported the incident shocked her and hurt her. R1's progress note dated 10/23/24 at 1:35 p.m., revealed R1 met with administrator and director of nursing (DON) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  F851 Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit accurate and/or complete data for staffing information at least quarterly based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data during (2024) 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Quarter three) in Federal Fiscal Year (2024), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. This has the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705 D identified the following dates triggered for review: 4/6/24, 4/20/24, 4/21/24, 5/19/24 and 6/15/24 for failure to have registered nurse (RN) coverage eight hours per day. Review of staffing schedules identified the facility had RN staff identified to have worked on 4/6/24, 4/20/24, 5/19/24 and 6/15/24 for at least 8 hours therefore the data submitted in the PBJ to CMS was inaccurate. When interviewed on 10/16/24 at 11:56 a.m., the administrator identified an RN was working for at least 8 hours on 4/6/24, 4/20/24, 5/19/24 and 6/15/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to store and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. This had the potential to affect all 32 resident currently residing in the facility. Findings include: During observations and interview in the facility dining room on 1/2/24 at 11:15 a.m., in the resident dining room were two refrigerators side by side. One refrigerator referred to as the nurse refrigerator by the culinary services director (CSD), had latches on the bottom refrigerator door and on the upper freezer door but was not locked. There was a thermometer inside and temperature logs were kept. Inside the freezer were mighty shake supplements the CSD stated were used by nursing for the residents. On top of the mighty shakes were ice packs, some with resident names the CSD stated nursing used for the residents. The refrigerator had spills and stains inside. The CSD stated the dietary staff stocked the mighty shakes and assumed nursing was responsible to clean it. On the door of the refrigerator was a sign reminding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit accurate and/or complete data for staffing information based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Quarter 4), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. Findings include: Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705 identified the following dates triggered: 7/1/23, 8/26/23, 8/27/23, 9/30/23 for failure to have licensed nurse coverage 24 hours per day and 8/5/23, 8/6/23, 8/19/23, 8/20/23, 9/2/23, 9/3/23, 9/30/23 for no registered nurse (RN) hours. Daily staff schedules on the above-mentioned dates identified licensed nursing staff including registered nurses had worked and therefore the data submitted in the PBJ to CMS was inaccurate. During interview on 1/4/23 at 3:02 p.m., administrator stated Human Resources submits the information for the PBJ reporting. Administrator stated the human resource staff who was responsible for submitting data was not available for interview on this date. Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents. During observations and interview in the facility kitchen on 1/2/24 at 11:15 a.m., above the kitchen stove, the vent screens were noted have two-three inch wide areas thick with grease and imbedded dust. When interviewed the culinary services director (CSD) stated he agreed the vent screens looked bad. The CSD stated normally staff should be taking two panels down at a time and running them through the dish washer. The CSD stated this appeared to not have been done and normally all panels should be washed every two weeks. The CSD stated he had no cleaning logs to show when it had been done last. When interviewed on 1/3/24 at 11:06 a.m., the day cook (cook)-A stated cleaning responsibilities were based on position. Cook-A stated the cooks cleaned the prep areas and pots and pans. Cook-A stated the vent panels were run through the dishwasher by whoever had time and they had been missed for the past couple weeks. Cook-A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based of observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medication was clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 residents (R5) reviewed. Findings include: R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and R5 had a diagnosis of asthma. R5's clinical order set dated 1/3/24, identified resident as having the following medication orders: - albuterol sulfate (an asthma medication) inhaler and to take two puffs, inhale orally every four hours as needed (prn) for wheezing and shortness of breath - fluticosone propionate (an asthma medication) inhaler to take two times a day for mild intermittent asthma - artificial tears ophthalmic ointment to instill into right eye four times per day for dryness R5's medical record lacked an order to self administer the above medications as well as an order for saline eye drops. R5's medication administration record (MAR) for December and January 2023, indicated staff were documenting use of her fluiticosone inhaler…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,928 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,928 — penalty dated 2023-11-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $644K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN