The Estates At Greeley LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-06-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to accurately transcribe an order for an anti-convulsant (anti-seizure medication) upon admission for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for medication administration in accordance with physician instructions. This resulted in actual harm for R1 when he had seizures and required treatment in the hospital. The facility had taken action to prevent this type of medication error from occurring again, therefore is being cited at past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's facesheet dated 6/25/24, indicated R1 was admitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses including generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes not intractable without status epilepticus (a seizure disorder). R1's hospital Medicine History & Physical dated 6/4/24, noted R1 had a history of epilepsy and cognitive disorder. It identified a diagnosis of generalized convulsive epilepsy with a plan to continue with home dosing of 1250 mg [milligrams] BID [twice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered passive range of motion (ROM) exercises were completed for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for range of motion.Findings include:R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R6 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side following a cerebral infarction (blocked blood vessels that deprived part of the brain of oxygen and nutrients). The MDS indicated R6 was dependent on staff for mobility. The MDS also indicated a restorative nursing program had not been completed.R6's physical therapy order, dated 3/31/26, directed staff to complete passive range of motion (ROM) exercises to R6's left arm two to three times daily. The order instructed staff to review the restorative nursing program instructions which were posted on the wall in R6's room.R6's care plan, revised 2/26/26, indicated R6 had impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to identify and appropriately monitor target behaviors for 1 of 1 residents (R22) reviewed for mood and behavior. Findings include:R22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, moderately severe depression, no exhibited behaviors, and received antidepressant medications. R22's diagnosis included major depressive disorder and spinal stenosis (narrowing of spaces in spine putting pressure on spinal cord and nerves causing pain and weakness). R22's care plan dated 6/11/26, indicated R22 had potential for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to daily use of psychotropic medications. R22's care plan further identified alteration in mood and behavior related to diagnoses, adjustment to placement, and loss of independence. The care plan instructed staff to monitor target behaviors and ADRs as ordered.R22's PHQ-9 assessment (screening tool used to diagnose and monitor severity of depression with a scale from 0…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff used enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 residents (R6) reviewed who required EBP. Findings include:R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R6 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side following a cerebral infarction (blocked blood vessels that deprived part of the brain of oxygen and nutrients). The MDS indicated R6 was dependent on staff for mobility and activities of daily living.R6's provider order, dated 2/10/26, instructed staff to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) related to the gastrostomy tube (G-tube).R6's care plan dated 2/13/26, identified a problem related to the need for EBP due to the G-tube. Interventions included staff following EBP, using appropriate communication regarding EBP, explaining the reasons for EBP, and donning and doffing personal protective equipment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions to reduce fall risk were implemented for 2 of 2 residents (R4 and R2) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R4 had intact cognition and no behaviors; had limited range of motion on one side of upper and lower extremity. R4 was dependent on a helper to do all the effort to transfer from chair to bed (or bed to chair). Sit to stand was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns. R4's care plan dated 6/9/25, identified she was at risk for falls due to impaired mobility and required assist of two staff for transfers using the MAXI lift (full body lift) r/t (related to) diagnoses of vascular dementia, non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (type of stroke), and right sided weakness. R4's Follow Up Question Report dated 4/12/25 through 6/11/25, identified assist of two staff was required to transfer R4 using the MAXI lift with an XL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report (within two hours) allegations of sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1 R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired with diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. R2 R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact with diagnoses that included a fractured rib and weakness. The Nursing Home Incident Report filed on 3/20/25 at 1:32 p.m., identified staff were aware of an incident 3/18/25 at 3:12 p.m., in which R1 reported R1 and R2 had a sexual interaction that started off as consensual and escalated to nonconsensual. R1 alleged R2 pinned or grabbed R1's hands during the incident. On 3/20/25 at 11:22 a.m., during an interview, the administrator stated the report he received from the hospital social worker (SW) on 3/18/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for allegations of sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1 R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired with diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. R2 R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact with diagnoses that included a fractured rib and weakness. The Nursing Home Incident Report filed on 3/20/25 at 1:32 p.m., identified staff were aware of an incident 3/18/25 at 3:12 p.m., in which R1 reported R1 and R2 had a sexual interaction that started off as consensual and escalated to nonconsensual. R1 alleged R2 pinned or grabbed R1's hands during the incident. The investigative file dated 2/18/25, for the incident between R1 and R2, included an interview by the social worker (SW)-A with R1, a list of R1's diagnoses, a signed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated to include interventions to address relationships and behaviors for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse prevention. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact with diagnoses which included a fractured rib and weakness. R2's care plan printed 3/20/25, indicated R2 was a vulnerable adult however, lacked mention of a relationship between R1 and R2 and lacked instruction to staff to monitor R2's behavior and interactions with female residents. On 3/20/25, at 12:38 p.m., during an interview, social worker (SW)-A stated she informed the director of nursing about R2's behaviors and informed staff to monitor the interactions. The SW-A stated she expected care plans to address monitoring of behaviors and confirmed the behavior was not addressed in R2's care plan. On 3/20/25 at 2:29 p.m., during an interview, nurse practitioner (NP)-A stated staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were utilized for 1 of 1 residents (R98) who required contact precautions for clostridium difficile (C. diff, a highly contagious infection). Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and appropriate hand hygiene was used for 1 of 1 residents (R20) observed during personal cares. Findings include: R98's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) report dated 8/2/24, indicated intact cognition and a diagnoses of enterocolitis due to c-diff, sepis, and urinary tract infection (UTI). R98's physician's orders lacked indication R98 required contact precautions. R98's care plan dated 8/2/24, lacked indication R98 required contact precautions. R98's progress note dated 8/6/24, indicated R98 was receiving Vancomycin oral solution 250 mg/5 milliliters (ml) and had one large loose stool. During observation on 8/6/24 at 2:31 p.m., R98's room had a sign on the door indicating contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 1 resident (R37). Findings include: R37's Optional State Assessment (OSA) dated 7/10/24, indicated R37 had severe cognitive impairment, did not have behaviors, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R37 continuously had inattention, disorganized thinking, and an altered level of consciousness that fluctuated. Additionally, R37 rejected care 1 to 3 days, wandered 1 to 3 days, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, had two or more falls with no injury, two or more falls with injury except major injury, was on hospice, and did not use restraints. R37's Medical Diagnosis form indicated the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease with late onset, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, muscle weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were completed under a removable device for R16 and failed to ensure interventions were implemented for R20 who both were reviewed and at risk for pressure injury. Findings include: R16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R16 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of left ankle fracture, lung disease, and schizoaffective disorder. R16's MDS further indicated R16 required assistance with mobility, was at risk for pressure injury and required pressure reliving devices for the chair and bed. R16's orthopedic consultation/clinic referral form dated 7/31/24, indicated R16 had a cam boot (removable splint) for the left lower extremity to wear while weightbearing. R16's provider order dated 6/6/24, indicated R16's left leg splint was to remain clean, dry, and intact until next clinic visit. R16's provider and nursing orders lacked indication they had been updated following R16's orthopedic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 45 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $974K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN