No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunrise Nursing & Rehabilitation

600 E Sunrise Drive, Raymore, MO 64083 · For profit - Individual · 152 certified beds · (816) 322-1991 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 322-1991 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 20231 actual-harm citation$10,193 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,193 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-11)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
402 W Pine St · (816) 322-0701 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Osco 51761.8 mi
1236 W Foxwood Dr · (816) 318-8255 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
200 N Washington St · (816) 322-2791 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Raymore Memorial Park, 307 S Park Dr · (816) 331-5167 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms80.4%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.1%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.7%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.6%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission11.4%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.1%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.642.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.862.331.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.6%CMS range 31.2–60.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.2–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.6–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
43.5%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 139.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.72 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-26)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer one sampled resident (Resident #2) safely by failing to use a full body mechanical lift or a gait belt to transfer the resident safely from the shower chair to his/her bed, resulting in a hospitalization, left knee swelling,use of a knee brace and increased pain with movement out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 127 residents. A policy was requested and no policy was received by the facility. 1. Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a progressive disease involving damage to the sheaths of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, whose symptoms may include numbness, impairment of speech and of muscular coordination, blurred vision, and severe fatigue), lupus (a disease that occurs when your body's immune system attacks your own tissues and organs and causes inflammation in the body), pain, glaucoma (increased pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of the one sampled resident's (Resident # 3) Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) was exercised to maintain the resident safety when the facility allowed a family member who was not the POA to take the resident out of the facility out of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 139 residents.Review of the facility's policy, Decision Making Capacity, dated 8/2020 showed:-Identifying a Surrogate Decision-maker: A person with legal authority to make medical treatment decisions on behalf of a resident was a person designated under a valid POA, a guardian, a conservator or a next of kin. The facility did not have a policy about an incapacitated resident leaving the facility. 1.Review of Resident #3's face sheet showed the resident had the following diagnoses:-Dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily living).-Psychosis (a disconnect from reality).-Altered mental status (a sudden change in a person's baseline awareness, cognition, or consciousness, ranging from mild confusion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage and labeling of medications throughout the facility's medication carts and medication rooms which had the potential to affect all residents within the facility; and failed to ensure medications were stored in the medication cart/medication room for one resident (Resident #58) observed during the medication pass. The facility census was 134 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications dated August 2020 showed: -Medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. -All medications dispensed by the pharmacy were stored in the pharmacy container with the pharmacy label. -Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that were cracked, soiled, or without closures were immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. -Expirations dates (beyond-use dates) of dispensed medications should be determined…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain plastic cutting boards and plate covers in good condition to avoid food safety hazards (cross-contamination); failed to separate damaged foodstuffs; and failed to store foodstuffs within their recommended acceptable temperature parameters, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and regulations, established national guidelines, and professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 134 residents with a licensed capacity for 156 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 6/23/25 between 9:51 A.M. and 11:39 A.M. during a kitchen sanitation inspection showed the following: -There was a 6-pound (lb.) 12-ounce (oz.) can of chili con carne on the bottom row of a dispenser rack in the Dry Storage (DS) room that was heavily dented toward its top side. -An open 1-gallon (gal.) jug of teriyaki sauce approximately (app.) 1/8 full on a middle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #12's admission record showed he/she admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Low Back Pain. -Chronic Pain Syndrome (a condition characterized by persistent pain lasting longer than three months, significantly impacting physical, emotional, and social well-being). Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June 2025 showed a physician order for Lidocaine Patch 4%, apply to lower back topically in the morning for pain related to Chronic Pain Syndrome. Observation on 6/24/25 at 7:54 A.M. of the resident's Lidocaine 4% patch administration completed by Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B showed: -He/She had put on gloves and unlocked the medication cart without washing or sanitizing his/her hands before putting on the gloves. -He/She removed the Lidocaine 4% patch out of the medication cart and took the patch out of the wrapper. -He/She then labeled the patch with a marker and locked the medication cart. -He/She then knocked on the resident's door…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR) screening was completed per facility policy for three newly hired employees (Employee #1, #2, and #4) out of 10 newly hired employees. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 134 residents. Review of the facility Background Check Policy dated 2/2025 showed: -Candidates for all staffing positions are subject to background checks. -The Department of Human Resources is responsible for the general administration and implementation of this policy. 1. Review of Employee #1's Employee File showed: -His/Her hire date was 8/28/24. -A FCSR was completed on 9/24/24, one month after the employee was hired. 2. Review of Employee #2's Employee File showed: -His/Her hire date was 7/24/24. -A FCSR was completed on 9/24/24, two months after the employee was hired. 3. Review of Employee #4's Employee File showed: -His/Her hire date was 10/2/24. -No documentation a FCSR was completed for this employee. 4. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that professional standards were met when Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B pre-popped and signed as given prior to administration the medications for three supplemental residents (Resident #6, #56, and #400) out of four supplemental residents. This practice had the potential to affect all residents in the 700 hall. The facility census was 134 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medication-Administration showed: -The purpose of the policy was to provide practice standards for safe administration of medications for residents in the facility. -The time and dose of the drug or treatment administered to the resident would be recorded in the resident's individual medication record by the person who administered the drug or treatment. -There was no specific policy related to pre-popping medications. 1. Review of Resident #6's admission Record showed that he/she admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store nebulizers (a drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) and a nasal cannula (a device that gives you additional oxygen (supplemental oxygen or oxygen therapy) through your nose) in a bag for three sampled residents (Resident #48, #41, and #105); and failed to complete a periodic assessment for one sampled resident's (Resident #63) ability to self-administer his/her respiratory care, including tracheostomy (trach - an opening surgically created through the neck into the windpipe; a tube is usually placed through this opening to provide an airway and to remove secretions) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 134 residents. Review of facility policy titled Respiratory Care Policy revised January 2025 showed: -Ensure that residents had comprehensive respiratory care provided to enhance resident safety and promote optimal respiratory health. -Respiratory care included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow Federal, State, and Local Laws to ensure the facility van was licensed to ensure legal transport of residents to and from the facility. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who required transportation to and from the facility for appointments. The facility census was 134 residents. A policy related to vehicle maintenance and licensure was requested and not received during survey. 1. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:41 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: -The facility had two vans in the parking lot. -One van had a sister facility's name on the side that the facility had not used due to the van having mechanical issues. That van had expired tags. -The second van had the facility's name on the side of the van. This was the van they used to transport residents to and from appointments. That van should have current license plates. Observation on [DATE] at 8:45 A.M. showed a van with the facility name parked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party when changes to his/her medication orders were changed for one sampled resident (Resident #80) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 134 residents. Review of the facility's Change of Condition Notification policy dated June 2020 showed: -Purpose was to ensure residents and resident representatives are notified of changes in condition in a timely manner. -A change of condition included changes in treatment. -Staff were to document the notification in the resident's medical records. 1. Review of Resident #80's admission Record showed he/she: -Was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -Had a medical Power of Attorney (POA- a person previously identified to make decisions for an individual in the event of inability to make wishes known). -Had diagnoses that included stroke, dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly smoking assessments were completed per facility policy for one sampled resident (Resident #24) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 134 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking by Residents dated November 2023 showed: -Residents who wanted to smoke would be assessed for their ability to smoke safely prior to being allowed to smoke independently in the designated smoking areas. -Residents who were not able to smoke independently and safely would be accompanied by facility staff while smoking. -All residents who smoked were to be assessed related to smoking safety at the time of admission and then at least quarterly thereafter. 1. Review of Resident #24's admission Record showed that he/she admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). -Tobacco use. Review of the resident's Safe Smoking Evaluation dated 1/3/25 showed: -The resident currently smoked. -The resident was not able to independently light smoking materials…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene during catheter (a hollow, partially flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care; and failed to ensure the catheter bag was maintained below the level of the bladder for one sampled resident (Resident #37) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 134 residents. Review of the facility undated Catheter Care policy showed: -A resident with a catheter receives care and services to prevent infections to the extent possible. -Wash hands and put on gloves prior to handling the catheter, drainage system or bag. -Position the catheter drainage system and bag utilizing gravity to facilitate drainage. -Always keep the urine collection bag below the level of the bladder. Review of the facility Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy dated August 2019 showed: -Use an alcohol-based hand rub, or soap and water before and after handling an invasive device, including a urinary catheter. 1. Review of Resident #37's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure as needed controlled mediation (drug or other substance that was tightly controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) were signed out on the Controlled Drug Administration Record and in the Nurse's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for two sampled residents (Resident #48 and #113) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 134 residents. Review of facility policy titled Administration Procedures for all Medications revised 8/2020 showed: -After administration, return to the cart, document administration in the MAR or Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and if the mediation was a controlled substance sign out the record. Review of the undated facility policy titled Medication Administration showed: -Medication will be administered by a licensed nurse per the order of an attending physician. -No medication will be used for any resident other than the resident whom it was prescribed. -Medication must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication rate under five percent for three sampled residents (Resident #130, #58, and #21) with a medication error rate of 22.58%. The facility census was 134 residents. A policy on insulin pens was requested and not received by the time of exit. Review of the facility Medication Administration policy undated showed: -Medications will be administered per the order of an attending physician or licensed practitioner. -Medications will not be left at the bedside. -The time and dose of the drug or treatment administered to the resident will be recorded in the resident's medication record by the person who administers the medication. A policy for self-administration of medications was requested and not received. Review of https://www.novomedlink.com/diabetes/products/treatments/novolog/dosing-and-administration.html, dated April 2025 showed the following instruction [sometimes called priming the pen] regarding use of insulin aspart (a rapid-acting insulin that helps lower mealtime blood sugar spikes for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident rights of one sampled resident (Resident #1) for self determination by inappropriately placing the resident on a locked unit without his/her consent and without evidence, rationale or documentation showing the resident was at risk for elopement, was exit seeking or had wandering behaviors or was a danger to self and needed a more secured placement out of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 127 residents. Review of the facility's undated Transfer of Resident from Non-Secure Unit to Secure Unit showed this policy outlines the process for transferring a resident within our facility from a non-secured, non-locked unit to a secure, locked unit. The transfer criteria include specific assessments, documentation, and approval to ensure resident safety and well-being. The policy showed: -The resident must have a recent elopement assessment that indicates a triggering risk for elopement. -Documentation should clearly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Residents #3) remained free from abuse, out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 122 residents. On 10/17/23, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 10/15/23. The facility administration was notified on the same day the incident occurred and investigations were started. Facility staff were educated on the facility's abuse and neglect policy, resident interventions, and behaviors before the start of next shift. Resident care plans were updated. The deficiency was corrected on 10/16/23. Review of the facility Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, dated 10/24/22, showed: -Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property. -Staff must not permit anyone to engage in verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. -The facility was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility dietary staff failed to observe and adhere to the sanitary and hygienic food practices as outlined in the professional standards of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Food Code, when they prepared residents' meals by not wearing the required hair restraints. The facility had census of 112 residents. 1. Observation on 8/3/23 between 5:03 A.M. and 6:45 A.M. in the kitchen, showed: -At 6:10 A.M. a Dietary Aide (DA) was in the kitchen and prepared cold cereal on a food preparation table. -The DA did not have a total covering of his beard, mustache and sideburns. -At 6:35 A.M. the Dietary Manager (DMgr) entered the kitchen, had a full beard with a mustache, and was not wearing a beard/hair restraint. -At 6:38 A.M. the DMgr started to assist the Dietary [NAME] (DC) in preparing breakfast food items without donning a hair restraint. During an interview on 8/3/23 at 6:42 A.M. the DMgr said he/she would normally wear a hair/beard restraint while in the kitchen but was late in getting to the kitchen and helping out the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to complete a background screening through the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) Registry prior to hire to determine if there was a Federal Indicator (FI - a marker given to a potential employee who has committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property against residents) for seven out of ten new employees whose files were sampled. This had the potential to affect any facility resident who received services from or whose medical records or belongings could have been accessed by one or more of the seven new employees. The facility census was 112 residents. On 8/7/23, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which took place over a period of time to include 1/19/23 through 7/22/23. The Human Resource (HR)/Payroll Director discovered the missing background screenings on 7/21/23 during an audit of employee files. Background screenings through the CNA Registry were obtained on 7/22/23 for employees who were missing the screening. On 7/23/23 the HR/Payroll Director received education on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility, failed to ensure residents' monthly Drug Regimen Review (DRR-thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication) were completed by the pharmacy to ensure irregularities were identified so they could be acted upon for four sampled residents (Resident #23, #41, #90, and #84) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 112 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled DRR revised 6/20/20 showed: -A pharmacist must review each resident's medication regimen at least once per month and document this in the resident's medical record. -If any irregularities were found, such as unnecessary mediations, excessive dose, excessive medication, excessive duration and/or inadequate monitoring, this must be communicated with the Director of Nursing (DON), the resident's physician, and the Medical Director. -The attending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program that included tracking and trending of facility resident infections. The facility census was 112 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program revised October 24, 2022 showed: -The facility must establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program under which it identifies, investigates, controls, and prevents infections in the facility and maintains a record of incidents and corrective actions related to infections. -The Infection Preventionist (IP) collects, analyzes, and provides infection data and trends to nursing staff, physicians. -The IP will determine specific sites and pathogen trends. -The IP will at least on a monthly basis conduct an infection control audit to identify trends. -Infection data is analyzed to identify trends. -Infection rates are compared to previous months in the current year and to the same month in previous years to identify trends, patterns, or problems that reflect the development of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included an antibiotic stewardship program that addressed antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 112 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program revised 6/20 showed: -The Infection Preventionist (IP) would be responsible for infection surveillance tracking. -The IP would utilize the Antibiotic Tracking Sheet. -The IP would measure and report outcomes at monthly/quarterly Infection Control Committee meetings. -The Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) was designed to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics while optimizing the treatment of infections, and simultaneously reducing the possible adverse events associated with antibiotic use. -The IP would report on the number of antibiotics prescribed and the number of resident treated each month to the Consultant Pharmacist. -The IP would collect and analyze infection surveillance data and monitor the adherence to the ASP and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #83) out of 24 sampled residents was free from physical abuse from another sampled resident (Resident #84), who had a history of previous resident to resident altercations, when Resident #84 placed his/her hand on Resident #83's neck and pushed him/her backwards causing Resident #83 to fall and sustain injuries, mainly bruising. The facility census was 112 residents. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy, dated October 24, 2022 showed: -The facility had zero tolerance for abuse. -The facility was committed to protecting residents from abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to other residents. 1. Review of Resident #83's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: -Anxiety disorder (a psychiatric disorder causing feelings of persistent anxiety). -History of falling. Review of the resident's Nurse's Notes, dated 5/5/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to place a date on items to indicate when they were placed in the walk in refrigerator; failed to maintain the fan that was used, free of dust on the metal grate and on the blades; failed to maintain the floors under the preparation steam table and the serving steam table free of food debris; failed to maintain the upper nozzles of the automated dishwasher free of debris within the nozzles; and failed to ensure dietary staff checked the temperature of the ground meat when he/she pulled it from the steamer. This practice potentially affected at least 90 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 96 residents. 1. Observations on 7/29/21 from 9:32 A.M. through 12:56 P.M., showed: - At 9:37 A.M. and 10:09 A.M., a heavy buildup of food debris under serving steam table. - At 9:57 A.M., the fan on floor with a buildup of dust on the blades, was used to circulate air throughout the kitchen. - At 10:02 A.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) A poured ground beef into a colander without checking the temperature. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-08-17 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control protocol and procedures were followed for the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during nasal testing for coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2, (COVID-19 a new disease caused by a novel (new) coronavirus). The facility census was 96 residents. Reference review by Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group Ref: QSO-20-38-NH DATE: August 26, 2020 and revised on 4/27/2021 showed: -Conduct testing in a manner that is consistent with current standards of practice for conducting COVID-19 tests. -During specimen collection, facilities must maintain proper infection control and use recommended PPE, which includes an N95 or higher-level respirator (or facemask if a respirator is not available), eye protection, gloves, and a gown, when collecting specimens. Reference review of the Center of Disease Control and Protection (CDC) Coronavirus Guidance for SARS-CoV-2 Point-of-Care and Rapid Testing, updated July 8, 2021, showed: -For personnel collecting specimens…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-17 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's rights for visitation were not limited, in a private area and not restricted for five sampled residents (Resident #1001, #1003, #1011, #1012, and #1017) out of 33 sampled residents. The facility census of 107 residents. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid revised visitation recommendations dated 4/27/21 showed: -Facilities shall not restrict visitation without a reasonable clinical or safety cause, consistent with 42 CFR § 483.10(f) (4) (v). -A nursing home must facilitate in-person visitation consistent with the applicable CMS regulations, which can be done by applying the guidance. -Failure to facilitate visitation, without adequate reason related to clinical necessity or resident safety, would constitute a potential violation of 42 CFR § 483.10(f) (4), and the facility would be subject to citation and enforcement actions. Record review of the facility's undated COVID -19 reopening Visitation Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: maintain a shower chair commode in the 600 Hall shower room free of debris; maintain a stand up lift on the 600 Hall free of a used adult brief in the open hallway; to maintain the beds of Resident's #76 and #72 in a clean and/or easily cleanable condition; to maintain oscillating fans in the room of Resident # 52 and Resident #34, free of a heavy buildup of dust; to maintain the mouthpiece for a breath operated call light system free of debris inside the mouthpiece for Resident #40; to maintain the shower stall of the 100 Hall shower room free of soap scum for two different days, and to ensure a pillow without cracks was available to Resident #58. This practice potentially affected at least 25 residents who resided in or used those areas. The facility census was 96 residents. 1. Observation with the Maintenance Director on 8/11/21 at 10:02 A.M., showed the commode shower chair with the presence of brown colored debris just underneath the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the shift change narcotic count sheet was filled out completely and was signed by both the on-coming and off-going nursing staff. The facility census was 96 residents. Record review of Storage of Controlled Substances policy effective 9/2018 and revised 8/2020 showed: -At each shift change, or when keys were transferred, a physical inventory of all controlled substances, including refrigerated items, was conducted by two licensed personnel and was documented. 1. Record review of the facility's Narcotic Shift Count Sheet for the 500 hall medication cart dated 6/27/21 thru 7/8/21 showed: -16 out of 30 opportunities the number of cards was not listed on the count sheet. -Seven out of 30 opportunities the change in controlled medication cards was not listed with the residents initials as required -One out of 30 opportunities the shift time was missing. -Three out 30 opportunities a shift narcotic count was missing. Record review of the facility's Narcotic Shift Count Sheet for the 500 hall medication cart dated 7/9/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the removal of debris from under the ice machine in the 700 Hall clean storage room and failed to ensure the box fan used in the laundry, was free of a heavy buildup of dust which blew dust on the clean clothing side of the laundry. This practice affected two non-resident use areas. The facility census was 96 residents. 1. Observation with the Maintenance Director on 8/11/21 at 9:44 A.M., showed the presence of debris including a glass container with black rocks, a cup, a spoon, and water under the ice machine located in the 700 Hall Clean storage room. During an interview in conjunction with an observation on 8/17/21 at 2:04 P.M., the Housekeeping Supervisor said it is the responsibility of the housekeeping department to clean under the ice machine. 2. Observation on 8/11/21 at 11:52 A.M., showed a heavy buildup of dust on the box fan (that was in use at the time of the observation) located on the clean side of the laundry. During an interview on 8/12/21 at 11:38 A.M., Laundry Aide (LA) A said he/she brought the fan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor and develop a care plan for one sampled resident (Resident #1001) who kept medications at his/her bedside and self administered these medications out of 33 sampled residents. The facility census was 107 residents. Record review of Certified Medication Technician (CMT) manual dated 2008 showed self administration of medication shall mean the act of actually taking or applying medication to oneself. Record review of the facility Pharmacy script self-Administration of Medication Policy revised 8/20 showed: -The resident who desire to self-administer medication were permitted to do so if the facility interdisciplinary team (IDT) has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there was a prescribed physician order to self-administer medication. -Assessment was conducted by IDT of the resident's cognitive (including orientation to time, physical and visual ability to carry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one sampled resident (Resident #1006) from possible abuse when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A wrapped his/her arms around the resident's shoulders during a verbal altercation; escorted him/her to his/her room unwillingly while other staff were present in area out of 33 sampled residents. The facility census was 107 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, dated 8/2020 showed: -The facility had zero tolerance for abuse and each resident had the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property. -The facility was committed to protecting residents from abuse by anyone including facility staff. -Procedures for abuse prevention and prohibition included training all employees, including contractors and volunteers, through orientation and on-going training sessions, no less than annually, on abuse prevention to include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medication was available for administration and failed to notify the physician of medications not being given as ordered for one sampled resident (Resident #23) out of 27 sampled residents. Six residents were sampled for medication review. The facility census was 96 residents. Record review of the facility's controlled substance (medications that have the potential for abuse and dependence) prescriptions policy dated as revised August 2020 showed: -A written prescription may be faxed to the pharmacy or a valid electronic prescription may be transmitted by the prescriber to the pharmacy. -The facility staff should contact the prescriber when the medication is not or will not be available for administration. 1. Record review of Resident #23's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 5/29/21 showed the following staff assessment of the resident: -Had short-term and long-term memory impairment. -Received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring to prevent resident falls was provided, failed to ensure fall interventions were followed to prevent falls and failed to document a comprehensive fall investigation for two sampled residents who were at risk for falls and had prior falls (Resident #36 and #72) out of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 96 residents. Record review of the facility's Fall Evaluation and Prevention policy and procedure dated 8/2020, showed the purpose was to ensure the resident's environment remained free from accident hazards as is possible, and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. The procedure showed: -Staff should evaluate the resident promptly in order to identify and treat injuries. -Following the resident's evaluation, transfer the resident to the appropriate surface. Monitor closely for indications of pain or discomfort or any signs of an injury. -Evaluate the environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician orders for oxygen for three sampled residents (Resident #44, #80, and #30) out 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 96 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #44's face sheet showed he/she last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a condition that results in the inability to effectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen, and induces chronically low oxygen levels or chronically high carbon dioxide levels). -Moderate Persistent Asthma (a respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs, causing difficulty in breathing. It usually results from an allergic reaction or other forms of hypersensitivity). -Dependence on supplemental oxygen. -Tracheostomy (an incision in the windpipe made to relieve an obstruction to breathing). Record review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 6/01/21 showed the resident did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a cover on the trash container within the kitchen and failed to close either the top lid or the sliding lid to the outside dumpster. The facility census was 96 residents. 1. Observations of the open trash container on on 7/29/21 from 9:32 A.M. through 12:56 P.M., showed: - At 9:34 A.M. a trash container open without a lid next to center steam table. - At 10:04 A.M. DA A placed a napkin in the open trash container. - At 10:13 A.M. the Dietary Manager (DM) placed a glove in the open trash container. - At 10:29 A.M. Dietary [NAME] (DC) A placed onion peels into the open trash container. - At 10:55 A.M., a new trash bag was placed inside the trash container - At 11:01 A.M. DC A placed a straw in the open trash container. - At 11:04 A.M. DM placed gloves in the open trash container. Observations on 7/29/21 at 10:56 A.M. and at 11:49 A.M., showed the lids of the outdoor dumpster were open. During an interview on 7/29/21 at 1:16 P.M., the DM said there should be a lid for the trash container. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,193 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,193 — penalty dated 2024-04-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
EL DORADO NURSING AND REHABILITATION LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
CALIBER ADVISORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
CRESTVIEW TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
HATTERAS INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
RIMPAU HOLDINGS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
SASEM INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
600 E SUNRISE DRIVE MO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
EMERALD PROPERTY PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
GIBRALTAR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
MONTGOMERY SKY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
OZARK HEALTHCARE REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
CATRON, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2023
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/12/2022
TADAKAMALLA, SRINATHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2023
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/22/2025
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
KAPLAN, MOSHAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/22/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/22/2025
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
ESDOV INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
JUBILEE MASTER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 5%Other / private 15%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$262per resident / day
operating cost
$7,963per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265476. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next