Odelia Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 211 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 115.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to recognize a resident's deteriorated (to become worse) health status and immediately notify the Medical Provider of a change in condition for 1 (R #33) of 1 (R #33) resident reviewed for a change in condition. If the facility it not actively monitoring resident changes and notifying the Medical Provider in a timely manner, then residents are likely to not receive the care and interventions needed to maintain their highest practical well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #33 revealed, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Fibromyalgia [disorder that affects muscle and soft tissue characterized by chronic pain], and secondary diagnoses that included, a need for assistance with personal care [assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, grooming and toileting] and Bipolar Disorder [mental health condition that results in mood swings that include emotional highs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide a qualified interpreter for 1 (R #7) of 1 (R #7) residents reviewed. If a facility fails to provide interpreter services, then residents with limited English proficiency may not be able to fully understand their care plan, ask questions about their treatment, or communicate their needs effectively to staff. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Interpreter Services policy, dated 2003, revealed all nursing home staff with a second language ability will be identified and utilized as interpreters, as needed, to ensure non-English speaking residents can convey their needs and preferences. B. Record review of R #7's admission Record revealed an admission date of 06/14/2025. C. Record review of R #7's Care Plan, dated 06/27/2025, revealed the resident had a communication problem related to Spanish speaking. D. On 08/27/2025, at 2:33 PM, during an interview, R #7's daughter stated her father was primarily Spanish-speaking, and the facility did not provide interpreter services for her father. The daughter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's MDS (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) was accurately coded for 1 (R #7) of 1 (R #7) residents reviewed. If the facility fails to ensure the Federally mandated MDS is accurately coded for residents, then the facility cannot develop appropriate care plans or provide individualized treatment, which places residents at risk for unmet needs, delayed interventions, and adverse health outcomes.The findings are: A. Record review of R# 7's Hospital Discharge Orders, dated 06/14/2025, revealed the following: -Resident to receive wound care for hematuria (presence of blood in the urine). -Resident to receive physical occupational therapy for hematuria. B. Record review of R #7's admission Record, dated 06/14/2025, revealed the following: -admission date of 06/14/2025. -Diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (a reversable brain disorder of the body's chemicals). -The record did not include a diagnosis of hematuria. C. Record review of R #7's admission MDS (MDS; a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care for a diagnosis included on their hospital discharge paperwork for 1 (R #7) of 1 (R #7) residents. If the facility fails to ensure all admitting diagnoses are included in the resident's plan of care, then staff may fail to monitor and treat the condition which could lead to the adverse outcomes or re-hospitalization. The findings are: A. Record review of R# 7's Hospital Discharge paperwork, dated 06/14/2025, revealed the following: - Diagnoses of hematuria (blood in the urine) attributed to traumatic Foley catheter insertion (injury or damage to the urethra, bladder, or surrounding tissue during Foley catheter)and urinary tract infections with hematuria.- Referrals to physical and occupational therapy.-Resident to receive care for hematuria (presence of blood in the urine). B. Record review of R #7's admission Record, dated 06/14/2025, revealed the following: -admission date of 06/14/2025. -Diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (a reversable brain disorder of the body's chemicals). -The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when staff failed to: - Maintain the air gap on the ice machine in a manner to prevent contamination and foodborne illness, - Properly store open food with labels and dates to prevent cross contamination and outdated usage, - Sanitize dishes when staff did not maintain the dish washing machine at 120 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F), per manufacturer's instructions, - Wash, rinse, and sanitize the food preparation sink between uses to prevent cross-contamination and the growth of food-borne pathogens, - Maintain the kitchen environment in a clean and sanitary manner, - Store clean dishes and single use plasticware in a manner to prevent contamination, - Thaw frozen food by submerging in cold running water. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination, the growth of foodborne pathogens, and foodborne illnesses. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who ate food from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the facility in a homelike manner when staff piled various items in an enclosed outside area near the facility. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who utilized the South 4 hallway, the Activities Room, and a courtyard near the Activities Room. If staff fail to maintain the facility in a homelike manner, then residents could feel unimportant and sad. The findings are: A. On 05/29/25 at 10:30 am, observation revealed a gated area located on the backside of the building which contained the following items: - Several metal frame beds with wooden headboards. - Wooden framed cage with metal wire. - A rolled up carpet. - Two new, still in box, hospital beds. - Two new, still in box, hospital bed mattresses. - Five cardboard boxes. - Metal scraps, buckets, medical equipment, and other items. The outside storage area was unkept and was not stored in an orderly manner. B. On 05/29/25 at 10:30 am, during an interview, the Maintenance Director (MD) stated the facility had a contractor which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to place caution signs on the floor when the floor was wet. This failure had the potential to affect any resident who wanted to walk down the hallway. If staff fail to post caution signs on a wet floor, then residents could slip, fall, and injure themselves. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Housekeeping Safety Precautions, last revised on August 2020, revealed the following: - Wet mop one side of the corridor or floor at a time and make sure the first side dried before mopping the other side. - Post a Wet Floor warning sign on both ends of the wet side of the floor. B. On 05/29/25 at 10:25 am, observation revealed the floor technician used the rotary floor machine (used to clean and shine floors) in the area between the main hallway and a section of resident rooms. The floor was wet, and there were not any caution signs posted. Two unknown staff members tiptoed across the wet section of the floor. C. On 05/29/25 at 10:25 am, during an interview with one of the unknown staff members, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement pharmacist recommendations for 1 (R #26) of 3 (R #9, #26 and #67) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications when staff failed to ensure R #26 had lab work completed. This deficient practice is likely to result in more than minimal harm because if residents lab work is not current then residents are likely to reach toxic levels of lithium (a mineral) or may not be receiving the correct dosage for therapeutic effects. The findings are: A. Record review of R #26's face sheet revealed an initial admission date of 07/20/15 and included the following diagnoses: - Mood disorder. - Bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by significant mood swings). - Major depressive disorder (a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of emotional and physical problems). - Obsessive-compulsive behavior (a mental health condition characterized by uncontrollable, recurring thoughts and behaviors that the individual feels compelled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #37) of 1 (R #37) resident reviewed for MDS assessments. This deficient practice could result in failure to provide adequate care and treatment of the resident's needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #37's face sheet revealed an admission date of 10/18/23 and included the following diagnoses: - Fracture (break of a bone.) -Muscle weakness (reduction in the power exerted by muscles.) B. Record review of R #37's care plan, dated 01/26/25, revealed R #37 was at a high risk for falls. C. Record review of R #37's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed health condition of injury (not major injury.) D. Record review of R #37's progress note, dated 01/21/25, revealed resident was found on the floor outside the bathroom. R #37's fall resulted in injury, and the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER). E. Record review of R #37's ER…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR; a federal requirement to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was accurate for 1 (R #31) of 1 (R #31) resident reviewed for PASRR accuracy. This deficient practice is likely to result in the facility not providing the services needed by residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #31's face sheet revealed an admission date of 05/18/18 with the following diagnoses: - Alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, primary admitting diagnosis. - Major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic disturbances. B. Record review of R #31's baseline care plan, dated 05/27/18, revealed R #31 used an antidepressant for depression. C. Record review of R #31's PASRR Level 1 Screening, dated 05/18/18, revealed staff documented R #31 did not have a diagnosis of or a suspicion of a serious mental illness. Further review revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff administered a resident's tube feeding (feeding tube; a medical device used to provide nutrition to individuals who cannot eat or drink normally) according to physician's orders for 1 (R #23) of 1 (R #23) resident. This failure could potentially cause a resident not to receive enough daily nutrition and lose weight. The findings are: A. Record review of R #23's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a traumatic brain injury (TBI; injury to the brain caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head) and used a feeding tube for nutrition. B. Record review of R #23's physician orders, dated 11/25/24, revealed the following: - Order for Glucerna 1.5 (nutrition) every shift continuously by feeding tube. - Administer 80 milliliters (ml) per hour for 20 hours [resident's tube feeding should run for 20 hours continuously and off for four hours per day]. - Continuous every shift via pump. - Flush 65…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,088 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $4,088 — penalty dated 2024-05-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM