No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Spanish Trails Wellness & Rehabilitation

1610 N Renaissance Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87107 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 134 certified beds · (505) 600-4800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 actual-harm citation$57,519 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $57,519 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3811 Commons Ave NE
Pharmacy
1421 N Renaissance Blvd NE · (505) 344-9129 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
609 Willow Rd NE · (505) 322-1637 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Midtown Business Park Albuquerque New Mexico · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
NLC Youth0.4 mi
4830 Pan American East Fwy NE · (505) 323-3900

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-07 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.9%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%2.0%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.4%11.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.9%14.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.1%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.2%14.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.0%86.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.9%22.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%15.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.561.651.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.902.811.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.1%CMS range 53.7–71.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.8–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.0–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
0.43
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.59
RN hoursweekends
64.4%
Total nursing turnover
78.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 127.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-25)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-07-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services to prevent the development and worsening of pressure wounds (also called a pressure injury; skin damage which results from unrelieved pressure on the body) for 1 (R #128) of 1 (R #128) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Timely identify the community acquired wound, monitor for changes in the wound, and notify the physician the wound was worsening for R #128. 2. Updating wound care treatment orders in relation to R #128's pressure ulcer becoming worse. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #128's pressure ulcer worsening and developing poor health outcomes. This deficient practice is also likely to lead to residents developing pressure ulcers and wounds worsening. The findings are: A. Record review of R #128's face sheet revealed R #128 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #128's admission observation, dated [DATE], revealed staff did not identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change (a major decline or improvement in a resident's physical or mental condition that is not self limiting, affects more than one area of health status, and requires review and potential care plan revision) Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident, when: R #3 began receiving hospice services while in the facility as ordered by a physician.This deficient practice could likely result in the residents not receiving the appropriate care and services they need. The findings are:A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed an admission date of 04/06/26 and a discharge date of 05/24/26, with the following diagnoses:Cerebral infarction (an area of dead tissue in the brain resulting from a blockage or narrowing in the arteries supplying blood and oxygen to the brain).Intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding from a broken blood vessel within the brain).Nonpyogenic thrombosis of intracranial venous system (blood clots form in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards for 2 (R #1, and R #5) of 2 (R #1, and R #5) resident reviewed medication errors when staff failed to:1. Ensure that an order was obtained before administering routine blood sugars checks for R #5.2. Ensure medications were available for administration for R #1 and R #5.3. Ensure Medication Administration Record is updated/corrected when medications are not administered for R #5.If the facility fails to administer medications as prescribed by the physician, then residents are not likely to receive the therapeutic value of medications prescribed, and if lab results are not relayed to the physician, then the physician is unable to properly monitor and assess the physical condition of the resident. The findings are:R #5: A. Record review of R #5's Physicians orders dated 12/16/25 revealed, Jardiance (medication used to control blood sugar levels) oral tablet 10 mg (milligram) by mouth one time daily. B. Record review of R #5's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment for 1 (R #2) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' preferences and care needs not being met.The findings are:A. Record review of R #2's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses (including but not limited to): 1. Age-related osteoporosis (bones to become weak and brittle) without current pathological fracture. 2. Epileptic spasms (is a brief, involuntary muscle contraction that typically lasts 1-3 seconds), not intractable, without status epilepticus (is a medical emergency characterized by prolonged seizure activity, typically defined as a seizure lasting more than 5 minutes or multiple seizures occurring without recovery in between.). 3. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses (including but not limited to): 1. Hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness of the face, arm and leg) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (is a type of stroke caused by a blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are:A. Record review of R #2's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses (including but not limited to): 1. Age-related osteoporosis (bones to become weak and brittle) without current pathological fracture. 2. Epileptic spasms (is a brief, involuntary muscle contraction that typically lasts 1-3 seconds), not intractable, without status epilepticus (is a medical emergency characterized by prolonged seizure activity, typically defined as a seizure lasting more than 5 minutes or multiple seizures occurring without recovery in between.). 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed for accidents and supervision when: The facility failed to ensure that a resident that need supervision/assistance was accompanied to a doctor's appointment and not left unattended for an extended period of time. This deficient practice is likely to make residents feel helpless and ignored, and possible experiencing avoidable accidents and/or injuries. A. On 02/06/26 at 1:20 PM during an interview with R #4's brother he stated. I got a phone call from the doctor's office asking who was supposed to pick my brother up, and they were concerned about his safety. He (R #4) had a stroke (medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to part of the brain is blocked or sudden bleeding in the brain) this was a follow-up appointment. I called the facility to ask why he was left alone. No one responded.B. On 02/06/26 at 1:24 PM during an interview with R #4's sister she stated. He had a scheduled appointment, and because of his cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of a significant medication error for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed. The facility failed to administer a prescribed anticoagulant, Warfarin, (medication used to control blood sugar levels) for three consecutive doses. This failure occurred despite the resident's high-risk clinical status for stroke and systemic embolism.The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses (including but not limited to): 1. Hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness of the face, arm and leg) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (is a type of stroke caused by a blood clot that blocks a brain artery) affecting left dominant side. 2. Muscle weakness (generalized). 3. Need for assistance with personal care. 4. Chronic migraine without aura (the most common type of migraine).B. Record review of R #1's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by not ensuring that staff received the appropriate training to mitigate resident aggressive behaviors. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #1 attacking an Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), resulting in R #1 falling. The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses (including but not limited to): 1. Fournier gangrene (an infection), 2. Unsteadiness on feet, 3. Cognitive communication deficit (affects the ability to communicate effectively due to impairments in cognitive processes), 4. Depression (feeling of sadness and loss of interest), 5. Cerebral infarction (stroke or CVA [cerebrovascular accident], blood flow to a part of the brain is obstructed). B. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care that meets professional standards for 1 (R #2) of 2 (R #'s 1 and 2) residents when the staff failed to:Follow physician orders for weekly skin assessments. Obtain a physician's order and complete a swallow study (a test that evaluates how well your throat and esophagus function while swallowing) without delay after recommendations by the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP). These deficient practices are likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider.The findings are:A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Metabolic Encephalopathy (a change in brain function caused by systemic metabolic disturbances, such as electrolyte imbalances, liver failure, or infections).Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing).Moderate Malnutrition.Weakness.Dementia. Weekly Skin Assessments: B. Record review of R #2's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide daily care needs including brief changes for 2 (R #'s 1 and 2) of 3 (R #'s 1, 2, and 3) residents reviewed for care needs.Failure to provide for residents' daily care needs can result in residents feeling dirty, unclean and ashamed.The findings are: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: Parkinsonism (a chronic, progressive disease of the nervous system). Acute Respiratory Failure (failure of the lungs to inflate and deflate properly) with hypoxia (low blood oxygen level). R #1 was discharged from the facility on 09/22/25 to return home. B. Record review of R #1's 5-day Minimum Data Set Assessment (a collection of assessments that determines a person's abilities and needs) dated 08/25/25 revealed the following: Brief Interview for Mental Status (a test that measures a person's memory and mental abilities) resulted in a score of 15 out of 15 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed from neglect. The facility failed to ensure that a resident was provided care and assistance by staff during the night of 08/29/25.Failure to prevent neglect of residents can result in residents' frustration and fear of being left alone and not assisted with care needs.The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including:Parkinsonism (a chronic, progressive disease of the nervous system).Acute Respiratory Failure (failure of the lungs to inflate and deflate properly) with hypoxia (low blood oxygen level).R #1 was discharged from the facility on 09/22/25 to return home.B. Record review of R #1's 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment (a collection of assessments that determines a person's abilities and needs dated 08/25/25 revealed the following:Brief Interview for Mental Status (a test that measures a person's memory and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly document the investigation of neglect of for 1 (R #1) of (R #1) resident reviewed for abuse or neglect. The facility was notified of an instance of neglect and investigated the allegation of neglect but failed to document the completed investigation.Failure to document reported investigations could result in confusion and misunderstanding of investigation results.The findings are:A. Record review of R #1 face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:Heart Failure (Failure of the heart to properly move blood through the body).Parkinson's Disease (a chronic medical condition that affects motor and non-motor systems of the body).Respiratory Failure (difficulty breathing).R #1's face sheet also revealed she was discharged from the facility on 09/22/25.B. Record review of New Mexico Health Care Authority Complaint and Incident records revealed incident #2604414 dated 08/30/25 stated R #1 was neglected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, #2, and #3) residents. Failure to develop a comprehensive care plan could result in residents not receiving optimal care that meets their daily needs and preferences.The findings are: A. Record review of R #1 face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:Heart Failure (Failure of the heart to properly move blood through the body).Parkinson's Disease (a chronic medical condition that affects motor and non-motor systems of the body).Respiratory Failure (difficulty breathing).R #1's face sheet also revealed she was discharged from the facility on 09/22/25.B. Record review of R #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a collection of assessments that describes a person's abilities and needs) 5-day admission dated 08/25/25 revealed that the MDS assessment was completed and signed by the MDS Registered Nurse on 09/04/25. C. Record review of R #1's Electronic Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents receiving care that is not medically appropriate. The findings areA. Record review of R #1's face sheet dated 07/10/25 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:-Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (a digestive disease in which acid is often regurgitated during/after eating).-Cognitive (mental) Communication Deficit.-Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (chronic disease affecting blood sugar levels).-Generalized Anxiety (nervousness) Disorder.B. Record review of R #1's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/29/25 to give all medications that are appropriate with food or snack. Ordered by (Name of Medical Doctor).C. On 07/10/25 at 9:20 am during observation and interview with R #1, he was seen in his room, in his bed. He stated he had already received and eaten his meal. He stated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document the changing conditions of 1 (R #3) of 3 (R #2, 3, 4) residents. The facility documented conflicting resident daily assessments for R #3's conditions. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident care and care plans being confusing and inadequate. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet dated 07/10/25 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 05/09/25 to return home with home health services. B. Record review of R #3's Admitting History and Physical dated 03/29/25 revealed she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnosis:-Left Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture (Broken Hip)C. Record review of R #3 Minimum Data Set (a set of assessments that describes a person's needs and abilities: MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following:-MDS Section C (section that assesses cognitive patterns) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a simple test that assesses a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Repeat Deficiency from 03/10/25 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's provider or Emergency Contact (EC) of the resident's change in condition for 1 (R #30) of 2 (R #15 and #30) residents reviewed for changes of condition (new or worsening symptoms). If the facility is not notifying the provider and EC when the resident experiences a change of condition, then both would be unable to make decisions related to treatment and advocate for the resident's care. The findings are: A. Record review of R #30's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Acute Respiratory (breathing) Failure with Hypoxia (low blood oxygen). -Heart Failure. -Unspecified Kidney Disease. -Malignant (cancer) Neoplasm (tumor) of upper third of Esophagus (throat). The face sheet further revealed the name and phone number of an EC for R #30. B. Record review of R #30's daily care notes revealed the following: -02/06/25 R #30 was sent to the hospital by R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 6 (R #'s 1, 54, 55, 70, 73, and 79) of 6 (R #'s 1, 54, 55, 70, 73, and 79) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Conduct a quarterly care plan meeting as required for R #'s 1, 54, 55, 70, and 73 in accordance with their admission date and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. 2. Update R #79's plan of care to include resident and resident's family assistance with colostomy (surgery to create an opening for the colon (large intestine) through the abdomen). These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: Care Plan Meetings: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's MDS resident assessment page located in R #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R #1's last two quarterly MDS assessments occurred on 09/09/24 (quarterly review)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to ensure: 1. Food items were labeled and dated in the kitchen refrigerator and freezer. 2. Food was stored appropriately and not left open to air in the kitchen freezer. 3. Food items were not expired in the kitchen and dry storage. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 117 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 04/21/25 and are likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 04/21/25 at 11:43 am, observation of the kitchen revealed the following: 1. Three large cheese pizzas were not labeled or dated and stored in the kitchen freezer. 2. One large cardboard box of green beans were left open to air and stored in the kitchen freezer. 3. Thirteen 24 count plastic containers of chocolate chip cookies was not labeled or dated and stored in the kitchen dry storage. 4. One 5 pound (lb) and 5 ounce (oz)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for residents' rights by walking into the room to speak to a staff member who's performing personal care on a resident. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents feeling as if they were unimportant and not having privacy. The findings are: A. On 04/22/25 at 12:30 PM during an interview with R #1, she stated that she felt a nurse did not treat her with respect when she went into the bathroom without announcing herself when she was showering. The nurse needed to talk to the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) who was assisting me with my shower. R #1 further stated, Just because she's a nurse doesn't mean it's okay to just go into someone's bathroom to talk to another staff. I felt like she didn't respect my privacy. B. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. C. Record review of R #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a timely assessment for 1 (R #15) of 2 (R #15 and #30) residents reviewed for hospitalizations and had a sufficient change (a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions) within 14 days of the significant event. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the care and assistance needed. The findings are: A. Record review of R #15 face sheet dated 04/29/25 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Paranoid (unreasonable suspicious thoughts) Schizophrenia (a psychiatric condition characterized by a disconnect from reality). -Psychotic (a psychiatric condition characterized by disorganized speech and behavior) Disorder with Delusions (unreal thoughts). -Chronic Kidney Disease -Diabetes (a condition that the body is unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Past non-compliance Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident money when debit card was used by unauthorized parties for 1 (R #47) of 2 (R #47, and 156) residents reviewed for exploitation (the fact of making use of a situation to gain unfair advantage for oneself). This deficient practice is likely to cause residents to feel unsafe, experience anger and frustration along with dealing with debit card theft, and fraud. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's investigative narrative report dated 09/12/23 revealed that R #156 had been admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and $1300.00 was withdrawn from her account on 08/02/23. R #156 expired in the hospital on [DATE]. The facility was unable to substantiate abuse or neglect or misappropriation. The facility is unable to determine who, make purchases or withdrew money from her account. All pertinent information has been turned over to law enforcement for further investigation. Staff have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #47) of 1 (R # 47) resident reviewed for skin issues received care and treatment that met the resident's needs by not documenting, assessing or treating residents skin issue. If the facility fails to provide the highest level of care to it's residents, then residents are likely to experience a decline in their wellbeing. The findings are: A. On 04/22/25 at 10:30 am during an interview with R #47 and observation of R #47's right eye, R #47 had redness and a sore on the right side of his face next to his right eye. R #47 stated he had a wound next to his right eye and he did not know what was wrong with it. R #47 further stated that it bothered him (pain) and he had asked someone to look at it. R #47 was unsure as to who he had let know about the wound . R #47 feels that he scratched himself because at times he does not have control of his hands. R #47 stated nursing had not examined it as of this day. R #47 was unsure of when he had scratched himself or when he had notified staff. B. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the facility providers (Nurse Practitioner, Physician) and the resident's Emergency Contact (EC), when a resident experienced an unwitnessed fall while also prescribed a blood thinner for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for a change of condition. This deficient practice is likely to result in a delay in treatment or inadequate treatment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #2's physician orders dated 01/03/25, revealed R #2 was prescribed and taking Warfarin (blood thinner) 2 milligrams (mg), once a day. C. Record review of R #2's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation- form used to help healthcare professionals communicate quickly) Communication form dated 01/09/25, revealed the Medical Doctor (MD) #1 was contacted at 4:40 am, and R #2's daughter was contacted at 5:40 am after R #2's fall. Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a quality care that meets professional standards for 1 (R # 2) of 1 (R #2) resident when the facility failed to obtain physician orders prior to providing oxygen (O2). If the facility is providing O2 without physician orders, then residents are likely to not receive the therapeutic benefits and care needed. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #2's O2 saturations (a measure of how much oxygen is in your blood) page located in R #2's electronic health record (EHR) dated 01/03/25 through 01/13/25 revealed R #2 was provided O2 on the following dates: 1. 01/13/25 at 8:42 am: R #2 was administered 3 liters per minute (LPM) of O2. 2. 01/11/25 at 8:02 am: R #2 was administered 2 LPM of O2. 3. 01/10/25 at 7:07 pm: R #2 was administered 3 LPM of O2. 4. 01/10/25 at 4:54 pm: R #2 was administered 3 LPM of O2. 5. 01/08/25 at 6:55 am:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food preference was followed for 1(R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident observed for dining. This deficient practice could result in R #1 not eating his meals and losing weight. A. On 03/06/25 at 10:46 am, during interview with R #1, she stated I can't eat any vegetables, gravy, chocolate, mashed potatoes, corn dog, chicken salad, and mushrooms and they keep giving me vegetables, gravy, chocolate, mashed potatoes, corn dog, chicken salad, and mushrooms. B. On 03/06/25 at 12:45 pm, during an observation of R #1's lunch plate, mashed potatoes were on R #1's plate which she had not eaten. C. Record review of R#1's meal ticket revealed red bold writing, can't eat all vegetables, gravy, chocolate, mashed potatoes, corn dog, chicken salad, and mushrooms. D. On 03/06/25 at 12:52 pm during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA), she confirmed R #1 had mashed potatoes on her plate. E. On 03/10/25 at 3:48 pm, during interview with Dietary Manager (DM), he stated R #1 has dietary restrictions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct an in-depth investigation and correct the grievance allegation for 1 (R #34) of 1 (R #34) residents reviewed for the outcomes and resolutions of their grievances. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not considering the needs of the residents or adequately resolving their grievances and lead to a decrease in resident quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of R #34's grievance report, dated 12/12/24, revealed the following: - Grievance Details: R #34 stated he deserved a hot meal, and he was tired of eating cold food that was also stiff. R #34 had to pull hair out of his food multiple times and stated the amount of hair in his food sometimes feels like spaghetti. R #34 also stated that he was legally blind, and the CNAs were not available to assist him with a brief change for one to two hours. - Investigation: Social Services Director (SSD) checked on R #34's food for breakfast. The food was warm but not to R #34's liking. No other investigation notes present. - Summary of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 2 (R #35 and #90) of 2 (R #35 and #90) residents reviewed when staff failed to conduct a quarterly care plan meeting as required. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: R #35: A. Record review of R #35's face sheet revealed R #35 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #35's care conference (care plan meeting) report revealed R #35's last care plan meeting occurred on 07/24/24. Staff did not document any other care plan meetings as completed after 07/24/24. C. On 12/18/24 at 2:43 pm during an interview with R #35, he stated he did not remember having a care plan meeting for a while. D. On 12/18/24 at 3:50 pm during an interview with the Social Services Director (SSD), he stated R #35 should have had a care plan meeting since 07/24/24. The SSD stated R #35 did not have a quarterly care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards for 2 (R #7 and #122) of 2 (R #7 and #122) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Ensure labs were reviewed and critical results conveyed to the medical provider in a timely manner. 2. Ensure medications were available for administration. If the facility fails to administer medications as prescribed by the physician, then residents are not likely to receive the therapeutic value of medications prescribed. If the facility fails to relay lab results, then the physician is unable to properly monitor and assess the physical condition of the resident. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of R #7's face sheet, dated 12/23/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including the following: Add punctuation to the end of each entry in the list below. - Diabetes (failure of the body to properly process and balance blood sugar), - Chronic kidney disease (a chronic failure of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent (%) when staff performed six medication errors out of 26 opportunities for 2 (R #118 and 122) of 6 (R #66, 89, 90, 118, 122) residents reviewed during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 23.08%. If residents are not informed of the medications they are receiving, then residents do not have the ability to accept or reject the medications being administered. The findings are: A. On 12/19/24 at 8:14 am during observation of Registered Nurse (RN) #2 administering medications, he poured and administered the following medications to R #118: - Amlodipine (medication to manage blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg), - Aspirin (medication prescribed to reduce blood clotting factors) 81 mg, - Atorvastatin (medication prescribed to reduce blood fats and cholesterols) 20 mg. B. Record review of R #118's physician orders revealed the following: - Dated 12/12/24, amlodipine 10 mg once a day at 7:00 am, - Dated 12/12/24, aspirin 81 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a safe and appetizing temperature for 4 (R #34, #43, #72, and #84) of 4 (R #34, #43, #72, and #84) residents reviewed for meal quality. This deficient practice is likely to lead to foodborne illnesses if staff do not maintain food temperatures outside of the danger zone [between the temperatures of 45 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) and 135° F; the temperature range in which food-borne bacteria can grow.) The findings are: A. On 12/17/24 at 9:55 am during an interview with R #84, she stated her food was usually cold when she received it in her room. R #84 stated she would like her food to be warmer. She stated she has the nursing staff the food was served cold, but staff continued to serve her food cold. B. On 12/17/24 at 1:28 pm during an interview with R #43, he stated his food was often cold, and he did not like that. R #43 stated his food was cold when he ate in his room and in the dining room. R #43 stated he told staff about his food being cold, but it did not change anything. C.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to assure staff followed infection control practices for 2 (R #118 and #122) of 2 (R #118 and #122) residents when Registered Nurse (RN) #2 did not wash his hands before and after he administered medications to residents. This deficient practice has the potential to spread infectious diseases between residents. The findings are: A. On 12/19/24 at 8:14 am during observation of medication administration, RN #2 drew and poured medications for R #118 into a medication cup. He took the medications to the resident, administered the medications, and returned to the medication cart. RN #2 then began to draw and pour medications for R #122 into a medication cup. RN #2 took the medications to the resident, administered the medications and returned to the cart. RN #2 did not wash his hands before, during, or after pouring and passing medications to the residents. B. On 12/19/24 at 8:20 am during an interview with RN #2, he stated he usually used the hand wash stations in the resident rooms. He stated he did not wash his hands during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to consider and provide the preferences of (R #81) of 1 (R #81) residents reviewed when the facility failed to assist R #81 with purchases that reflected R #81's interests after R #81 asked the facility staff for assistance. These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident's personal choices not being honored. The findings are: R #81: A. Record review of R #81's face sheet revealed R #81 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #81's care plan, dated 01/23/24, revealed R #81 liked to watch TV, paint, read, and use his computer. Staff to ensure R #81 had materials for individual activities as desired and materials for painting. C. On 12/17/24 at 9:34 am during an interview with R #81, he stated he was unable to purchase his painting materials and additional winter clothes. R #81 also stated the previous Social Services Director (SSD) would assist him with purchasing those items, but nobody offered to help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide food to accommodate resident preferences for 1 (R #225) of 1 (R #225) residents observed for food preferences. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident frustration and weight loss due to the resident not receiving and eating their preferred diet. The findings are: R #225: A. Record review of R #225's face sheet, dated 12/23/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #225's physician dietary order, dated 12/13/24, revealed she was to receive the house (regular) diet. C. Record review of R #225's Diet Order and Communication, dated 12/13/24, revealed R #225 was to receive a regular diet with no pudding or sweet desserts. The admitting nurse signed the order. D. On 12/16/24 at 2:30 pm during observation of R #225's room, she had multiple food items stacked on her room shelf. The foods were all labeled as vegan compliant. E. On 12/19/24 at 1:30 pm during observation of R #225's meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by a Physician for 1 (R #64) of 1 (R #64) residents reviewed during random dining observations. If the facility fails to provide a diet as ordered, then residents are likely to experience weight loss due to not receiving their prescribed nutritional caloric intake. The findings are: A. Record review of Dietary Census List, dated 12/23/24, revealed R #64 was on a regular pureed diet (a texture modified diet that requires no chewing.) B. Record review of R#64's care plan, dated 12/19/2024, revealed R #64 was on a regular pureed diet, start date 04/05/24. C. Record review of R#64's Dietary Meal ticket, dated 12/23/24, revealed staff to provide a therapeutic diet (a meal plan prescribed by a doctor or dietician that controls the intake of foods or nutrients as part of a treatment.) D. On 12/16/24 at 12:40 pm during a lunch observation, staff served R #64 pureed mashed potatoes, pureed carrots, and mechanical soft (a texture modified diet that requires some chewing but less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    PAST NON-COMPLIANCE Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance with toileting and brief changes for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed. These deficient practices have the potential to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are A. Record review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 06/06/24, revealed R #1's daughter contacted the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) to inform ADON that she reviewed an in-room video camera recording of R #1's care during the day of 05/28/24. The daughter stated the recording showed staff did not enter R #1's room to provide care, to assist with toileting, or to check the resident's brief on 05/28/24. The FRI further documented the ADON interviewed the Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) assigned to provide care to R #1 on 05/28/24. The CNA stated R #1 did not use her call light during the day, and the CNA did not check on R #1 during her 12 hour shift. B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when staff failed to: - Maintain the ice machine in a manner to prevent contamination and foodborne illness, - Perform hand hygiene and to change gloves as often as necessary to avoid cross contamination, - Protect clean dishes and plastic ware to prevent contamination, - [NAME] and serve pureed food at the appropriate temperatures to prevent the growth of foodborne pathogens and illnesses, - Allow dishes to air dry completely before use or storage, - Keep staff food separated from resident food, - Utilize hair restraints and beard guards in a manner which restrained all hair while in the kitchen, - Properly store open food with labels and dates to prevent cross contamination and outdated usage, - Store scoops for bulk bins in a manner to prevent cross contamination, - Use the sanitizing solution according to manufacturer's instructions, - Wash, rinse, and sanitize the food preparation sink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 3 (R #45, #60 and #320) of 2 (R #45, #60 and #320) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Update the care plan to include Activities of Daily Living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) care for R #45 and #60. 2. Update the care plan to include activity preferences for R #60. 3. Inform the Power of Attorney (POA) of changes in care plan to include new behaviors for R #320 These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: R #45: A. Record review of R #45's face sheet revealed R #45 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 05/17/24, revealed R #45 required partial to moderate assistance, in which the helper did less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths and showers for 2 (R #'s 45 and 60) of 2 (R #'s 45 and 60) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: R #45: A. Record review of R #45's face sheet revealed R #45 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 05/17/24, revealed R #45 required partial/ moderate assistance, in which the helper did less than half the effort. Helper lifted, held, or supported the resident's trunk or limbs, but provided less than half the effort for most ADL tasks. C. Record review of R #45's physician orders, dated 05/13/24, revealed R #45 was to be offered/receive a bath or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff did not leave medications on the resident's bedside table. These deficient practices had the potential to impact the health of all residents on the 400 hall, and could likely result in residents taking a medication that is not intended for them or taking more than the dose prescribed. The findings are: A. On 07/18/24 at 12:03 PM, during an observation of R #28's room, there were a total of 12 pills. Six pills were oblong shaped pills engraved with LS703 (Ranolazine; used to treat chest pain), four yellow oval pills engraved with AN038 (Mucus Relief DM dextromethorphan 30 mg / guaifenesin 600 mg)], two beige oval pills engraved with MP9 [Pantoprazole Sodium Delayed Release 40 mg (used to treat acid reflux)] on R #28's bedside table. H. On 07/18/24 at 12:03 PM during an interview with R #28, he stated he did not know what the pills were or how long they were on bedside table. B. Record review of R #28's Physician order, dated 07/01/24, revealed the following: - An order for ranolazine ER, 500…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed nutritionally calculated recipes for pureed diets. Failure to follow recipes that have been approved by the Registered Dietician (RD) has the potential for food not to meet the nutritional requirements of the residents. This failure had the potential to affect all six residents who ate pureed meals. The findings are: A. Observation on 07/15/24 at 10:52 am revealed the [NAME] placed one premeasured bag of vegetables into the food processor bowl. She added an unmeasured amount of a chicken flavored powder. The [NAME] pureed the mixture until smooth and placed it in the warmer for lunch service. B. On 7/15/24 at 10:54 am, during an interview, the [NAME] stated she prepared pureed meals for six residents. She stated she did not know the measurement of the vegetables, because they came in a pre-measured bag. She stated she added one bag of vegetables. The [NAME] stated she did not have a recipe for the pureed vegetables, and she did not know how much chicken flavored powder she added to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for 4 (R #'28, #45, #60, and #79) of 4 (R #28, #45, #60, and #79) residents identified during random observation when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure nasal cannulas [a device that delivers extra oxygen (O2) through a tube and into your nose] were labeled with the date when they were changed for R #28 and #79. 2. Ensure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP; used to treat sleep apnea) equipment was stored appropriately for R#45 and #60. 3. Ensure R #60's nebulizer (device for producing a fine spray of liquid, used for example for inhaling a medicinal drug) was stored appropriately. This deficient practice could likely result in the spread of contagious and resistant illnesses to other residents. The findings are: Nasal Cannula Findings: R #28 A. Record review of R #28's physicians order, dated 06/02/23, revealed keep O2 cannula/mask/tubing and/or nebulizer mask/tubing bagged when not in use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance devices for 1 (R #13) of 1 (R #13) residents reviewed during random observation. This deficient practice are likely to result in residents being unable to perform activities of daily living which could likely result in consuming less food. The findings are: A. Record review of R #13's Annual Nutritional Assessment, dated 04/23/2024 and completed by the Registered Dietitian, revealed a recommendation for sippy cup (a plastic cup with two handles). B. Record review of R #13's physician orders, dated 04/01/24, revealed an order for a sippy cup with all meals. C. Record review of R #13's meal ticket, dated 07/18/24, revealed a note for a sippy cup. D. On 07/18/24 at 12:00 PM am during lunch observation, staff served R #13 his lunch meal plate without a sippy cup. Further observation revealed R #13 ate lunch and did not have a sippy cup. E. On 07/18/24 at 12:03 PM during an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 stated she never saw a sippy cup. She confirmed there was not a sippy cup with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the rights of 1 (R #1) of 2 (R #1 and #2) residents when the facility administered medication to reduce the resident's sexual feelings and desires. This deficient practice could cause residents to feel repressed and unable to interact in intimate relations. The findings are: A. On 04/29/24 at 11:00 am through 3:00 pm, during observation, R #1 left his room, walked the hallway, interacted with other residents and staff, and participated in activities. B. Record review of R #1's face sheet, dated 04/29/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: - Vascular (related to blood vessels and blood flow) dementia (a chronic progressive decline in mental abilities), - Psychotic disturbance (a psychiatric condition that affects thought and behavior), - Mood disturbance (alteration of feelings), - Cognitive communication deficit (a breakdown in the link between thought and speech). - R#1's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility provided an anti-depressant (a medication that treats the symptoms of depression and sadness) medication for 1 (R #1) of 2 (R #1 and #2) at an excessive dose and without adequate indications for its use. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident being overmedicated leading to greater risk of developing side effects such as drowsiness, weight gain, nausea, fatigue. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet, dated 04/29/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: - Vascular (related to blood vessels and blood flow) dementia (a chronic progressive decline in mental abilities), - Psychotic disturbance (a psychiatric condition that affects thought and behavior), - Mood disturbance (alteration of feelings), - Cognitive communication deficit (a breakdown in the link between thought and speech). B. Record review of R #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed accurate medical records for 9 (R #s 19, 31, 73, 91, 92, 200, 202, 203, and 247) of 9 (R #s 19, 31, 73, 91, 92, 200, 202, 203, and 247) residents reviewed for the following: 1. Activity participation logs were not completed for R #'s 19, 31, 73, 91, 92, 200, 202, and 203. 2. Medication administration notes and pertinent admission notes were not documented for R #247. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not knowing of resident daily activities and preferences, or why a resident requires medications and pertinent admission information. The findings are: Activity Log Findings: A. On 09/21/23 at 2:41 pm during observation of resident rooms, each room contained a calendar labeled September 2023 Spanish Trails Rehabilitation and Suites. The calendar listed a variety of activities that were available to residents on a daily basis. The calendar was posted on the wall of each occupied room. B. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$57,519 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $47,580 — penalty dated 2024-07-22
  • $9,939 — penalty dated 2023-09-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ESPANOLA HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2025
ESPANOLA TRAIL ADVISORS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2025
RENAISSANCE HOLDINGS TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2025
FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2025
SASEM INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2025
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2025
LEHNERZ, LORRAINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
STOLARCZYK, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
DAVIDOVICH, NIVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2025
FRIEDMAN, DEVORAHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2026
FRIEDMAN, MARKIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2025
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2025
ABQ PROPCO ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
ALBUQUERQUE NM PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
BYZANTINE NM TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
MD FRIEDMAN FAMILY 2017 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
NEAL EINHORN FAMILY 2017 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
RENAISSANCE HCP HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
THREE ERAS REALTY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
LEVENE, CHAIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$840K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 7%Other / private 31%

This home reported $840K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$403per resident / day
operating cost
$12,263per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$365per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325131. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next