Gallup Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 58.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #'s 1, 2 and 3) residents when they failed to properly assess a resident following an unwitnessed fall that resulted in injury. If the facility fails to properly assess residents who have an unwitnessed fall with an injury, then the residents may experience unidentified life-threatening conditions such as a brain bleed. This deficient practice likely contributed to the hospitalization and passing of R #1. The findings are: A. Record review of Face Sheet for R #1 revealed an admission date of 7/13/24 and a discharge date of 09/21/24 and included the following diagnoses: - Lack of Coordination - Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (wasting away) - Depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) - Generalized Muscle Weakness (muscle weakness that affects the whole body) - Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) - Difficulty in Walking - Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 (R #50 and R #51) of 2 (R #50 and R #51) residents reviewed when: Facility staff failed to administer or withhold blood pressure medications as directed by blood pressure parameters (boundary or limit defining scope of particular activity or process) per R #50 and R #51's physician's order. If the facility does not follow physician orders for the management of a resident's blood pressure, then it is likely to result in the resident not maintaining optimal health outcomes as established by the medical provider. The findings are: R #50: A. Record review of R #50's physician's order dated 07/16/25 revealed, R #50's lisinopril (medication used to treat high blood pressure) medication was ordered to be held for systolic blood pressure (the pressure in the arteries when the heart beats, represented as the first (top) number in a blood pressure reading) less than 110 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). B. Record review of R #50's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 01/01/26 to 01/21/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment and protect the residents from the potential for accidents and hazards by: Failing to ensure adhesive tape (is a strip of material with a sticky surface on one side that is used to hold, fasten, or secure items in place) applied to resident room floors remained secured and flat to the surface in Room (RM) #41, Failing to ensure a water hose connected to the ice machine remained secured within its protective case, allowing water to drip onto the floor in a hall that is accessible to all residents. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 57 residents listed on the facility census by creating a tripping and slipping hazards, which can put the residents at risk for falls and potential injury. The findings are: A. On 01/21/26 at 10:31 a.m., during an observation of RM #41, multiple strips of adhesive tape were applied directly on the bedroom floor near the bedside area. Several strips of tape appeared worn, partially detached, and curling upward at the edges. Dark adhesive residue remained on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe and functional environment for 7 (Rooms: RM's #15, 31, 33, 34, 36, 37, 43, 44 ) of 13 (RM's #15, 16, 17, 21, 25, 31, 33, 34, 36, 37, 43, 44, 45 and 49) rooms observed when the facility failed to: Repair walls with intact, smooth, and cleanable surfaces (scuff marks, chipped paint, uneven paint, visible putty).Repair windowsills and surrounding tiles.Repair fixtures and building components (heating vent and electrical outlet). These deficient practices are likely to expose residents to an unsafe and uncomfortable environment. The findings are: A. On 01/21/26 at 3:12 pm during an observation of RM #15, the windowsill closest to Bed B was unpainted and separating from the wall with a gap approximately 0.5 inches. B. On 01/23/26 at 9:50 am, during an observation of RM # 31, the bathroom walls had scuff marks and chipped paint. C. On 01/23/26 at 9:51am, during an observation of RM #33, the windowsill closest to Bed B had a loose tile. D. On 01/23/26 at 9:53 am, during an observation of RM #34, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create a baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #67) of 1 (R #67) resident reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' preferences and care needs not being met. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Care Plans- Baseline policy dated December 2016 revealed, to ensure resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. B. Record review of R #67's face sheet revealed R #67 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. C. Record review of R #67's baseline care plan revealed R #67's care plan was initiated on 01/12/26 (initiated and completed after 48 hours of admission). D. On 01/23/26 at 9:31 am, during an interview with Director of Nursing (DON), she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete for 1 (R #51) of 1 (R #51) resident reviewed when staff failed to: Document accurately and completely when R #51 was not administered medication per physician's orders. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not having the information they need to provide competent, comprehensive care and services to residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #51's physician's orders dated 11/20/25 revealed, R #51's carvedilol (medication used to treat chronic heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction following heart attack, and high blood pressure) administration for hypertension (HTN; high blood pressure) to be held for systolic blood pressure (the pressure in the arteries when the heart beats, represented as the first (top) number in a blood pressure reading) of less than 110 mmHg or a heart rate less than 60 beats per minute. B. Record review of R #51's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 01/01/26 to 01/21/26 revealed the administration for carvedilol on 01/01/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (R #34) of 1 (R #34) resident reviewed for infection control when: The facility did not ensure R #34's urinary catheter (a thin, sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag had a privacy bag (bag that covers urination drainage bag) present. The facility did not ensure R #34's urinary catheter tubing (is the flexible tube that carries urine from the catheter (inside the bladder) to the drainage bag outside the body) remained off the floor to prevent contamination. These deficient practices are likely to result in repeated and ongoing exposure of residents to increased risk of infection, cross-contamination, and injury. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Catheter Care Procedure (steps to maintain the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide facility Initiated Reports (mandatory self-initiated facility report of an incident) to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #'s 1, 2 and 3) residents reviewed for incidents when staff failed to report an unwitnessed fall with an injury for R #1. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's nursing progress notes dated 09/13/24 revealed that R #1 was found on the floor in his room laying on his stomach at the foot of the bed about 1 foot from floor safety mat. Upon assessment, resident was noted to have a cut about 4 centimeters long over his right eye. The wound was cleansed with normal saline, antibacterial ointment (topical medication used to prevent infections) was applied, and the wound was covered with a bandage which was used to reinforce and keep the resident from touching it. B. Record review of R #1's nursing progress note, also dated 09/15/24, revealed that R #1 had a change in condition of altered mental status. This nursing note also revealed that R #1 was alert and oriented x1 (times…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0848 — pattern
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their binding arbitration agreement included a provision for convenient venue (a location in which to carry out arbitration proceedings which should be agreed upon and suitable for both parties) selection. Failure to include this provision in the agreement could likely result in residents who choose to seek arbitration experiencing frustration and difficulty deterring them from exercising their rights. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 56 of the 57 facility residents who signed the binding arbitration agreement. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Voluntary Arbitration Agreement, undated, revealed it did not contain a provision for the selection of a convenient venue should arbitration become necessary. B. On 10/10/24 at 1:00 pm during an interview with the facility Administrator, she confirmed the binding arbitration agreement did not include a provision for a convenient venue selection and added the provision was stated in the facility's admission Guide. C. Record review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 1 (R #35) of 1 (R #35) residents reviewed for residents' rights when staff closed the resident's room door against his wishes and without communicating why to the resident. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents feeling disrespected and as if they were kept in their room against their will. The findings are: A. On 10/07/24 at 1:35pm during at interview, R #35 stated the Housekeeping Manager (HM) #1 angrily slammed his door shut last week while he was listening to his music, which made him feel like the staff did not respect or care about his feelings. B. On 10/07/24 at 2:00pm, during an observation, R #35 listened to music. The volume was loud enough to be heard in the immediate hallway. Other residents in the hallway did not appear to be affected by the music. C. On 10/10/24 at 12:47pm, during an interview with HM #1, she recalled the incident in which she shut the resident's door and stated R #35's music was playing loudly while the staff had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create a Baseline Care Plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #108) of 3 (R #15, #25 and #108) residents reviewed for Baseline Care Plans. This deficient practice could likely result in a decline in the residents' condition due to staff not being aware of the care residents' need and residents not being able to attain or maintain their highest practical level of well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of the Face Sheet for R #108 revealed an admission date of 9/26/24 and included the following diagnoses: - Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (when there is not enough oxygen in your blood/body tissue). - Type 2 diabetic mellitus with neuropathy (high blood sugar with nerve damage). - Hyperlipidemia (high blood fat levels). - Obstructive sleep apnea (repeated breathing interruptions during sleep). - Hypertension (high blood pressure). - Atherosclerotic heart disease (build up of fats,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM