Grants Wellness & Rehabilitation LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 68.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide quality care for 1 (R #18) of 2 (R #18 and 30) residents reviewed for death, by not monitoring R #18 oxygen saturation levels and ensuring that R #18 had his nasal cannula in place, after a change in condition was identified (needing supplemental oxygen) due to low oxygen saturation measurements the evening before. These deficient practices likely resulted in resident's passing. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's policy titled INTERACT- Change in Condition Evaluation- CICE, last reviewed 12/02/2021, revealed the following procedure for a change in condition: Purpose: To improve communication between nurses and a provider when nursing is monitoring a change in condition. To enhance the nursing evaluation of and documentation of a resident who has a change in condition. To provide a standard format to collect pertinent clinical data prior to contacting the provider when there is a change in condition. To standardize…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to protect 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident from the potential of elopement (when a resident leaves the facility without the knowledge of the staff) and accidents. If the facility fails to properly supervise residents for elopement, serious injury or death may occur if they leave the facility unannounced. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet, dated 01/24/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: - Dementia (a chronic persistent condition, decline of mental abilities) unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, - History of falls, - Muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass), - Unspecified injury of head. B. Record review of R #1's Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 11/02/23, revealed R #1 had a history of wandering, because he wanted to be with his dog. C. Record review of R #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening for cognitive impairment), dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive assessment completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for MDS accuracy. This deficient practice is likely to result in a failure to provide adequate care and treatment of the residents' needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Aphasia (inability or difficulty communicating),Dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease),Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment). B. Record review of R # 1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed R #1 had clear speech and did not have difficulty communicating. C. Record review of R # 1's Comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate treatment and services related to a Foley catheter (indwelling catheter; a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident, when staff failed to: Maintain free urine flow through a Foley catheter by positioning the catheter collection bag (also called a drainage bag; a device connected to the catheter tubing to collect urine) below the level of the bladder (hollow organ in the human body that collects urine) so urine can flow freely.This deficient practice is likely to increase the risk of infection and compromises the quality of catheter care. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's catheter care policy, dated 06/2020, revealed the following: Residents receive the appropriate care and services to prevent infections to the extent possible.Position the catheter, drainage system, and bag utilizing gravity to facilitate drainage.The catheter collection bag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 5 (R #1, #2, #3, #5, and #8) out of 5 (R #1, #2, #3, #5, and #8) residents reviewed by not: Maintaining comfortable and safe temperature levels for R #1, #2, #3, and #5. Providing R #8 bed linens. If the facility fails to maintain a homelike environment, then residents are likely to feel uncomfortable and could exacerbate (make worse) health issues. The findings are: Temperature: A. On 01/22/26 at 8:39 am, during an observation of R #1's room, R #1 was lying in bed sleeping with two blankets present. One small blanket was over her upper body and head, and another blanket was covering her feet. R #1's room was colder than the common area and the other rooms on the unit. The thermostat in R #1's room was set to 59 degrees Fahrenheit (F). A large wall furnace was present, but not operational. When R #1's room thermostat was set to a higher temperature, the furnace did not activate. B. On 01/22/26 at 8:45 am, during an observation and interview with R #3, R #3's room was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial and cognitive assessment completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #8) of 1 (R #8) resident reviewed for MDS accuracy. This deficient practice could result in failure to provide adequate care and treatment of the resident's needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #8's face sheet revealed R #8 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (a condition in which high blood sugar from diabetes causes damage to the nerves that control automatic body functions, such as heart rate, digestion, blood pressure, and bladder control), Personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA; a brief blockage of blood flow to the brain that causes stroke-like symptoms), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits cerebral infarction…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered diabetic foot care was provided for 1 (R #8) of 1 (R #8) resident reviewed for foot care. This deficient practice is likely to result in foot related complications, including infection, injury, or worsening foot conditions. The findings are: A. Record review of R #8's face sheet revealed R #8 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (a condition in which high blood sugar from diabetes causes damage to the nerves that control automatic body functions, such as heart rate, digestion, blood pressure, and bladder control), Paraplegia (paralysis of the lower half of the body, typically affecting both legs, usually caused by injury or disease of the spinal cord), Cognitive communication deficit (trouble understanding, remembering, or expressing ideas because of problems with thinking skills, often due to brain injury or illness), Reduced mobility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to:Demonstrate its measures to minimize the risk of Legionella (bacteria naturally found in water that can cause a severe type of lung infection called legionnaires' disease when people inhale tiny water droplets containing the bacteria) in the building's water system, when the Water Management Program (WMP) team failed to develop and implement an adequate Legionnaires Water Management Program (LWMP). If the facility does not have a an adequate LWMP, then residents can be at risk of legionellosis (legionnaires' disease and Pontiac fever, a milder flu-like illness).These failures had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's LWMP, last revised on 06/2020, showed the following: - The policy did not have a procedure on how to use the control measures to control the introduction and/or spread of Legionella in the building water system. - The policy did not include control limits (the maximum value, minimum value, or range of values that are acceptable for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 1 (R #33) of 1 (R #33) residents when R #33 was found sitting in the dining room during lunch with an active bleeding wound on his hand, which included blood on his clothing, face, and both hands. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents feeling unimportant to facility staff and an increased risk of infection due to being around other residents in the dining room. The findings are: A. Record review of R #33's face sheet revealed a re-admission date of 08/18/25 and included a diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit (difficulties in communication that arise from impaired cognitive functions, such as attention, memory, reasoning, and problem solving) and degenerative disease of nervous system (conditions that gradually damage and destroy parts of your nervous system, especially areas of the brain). B. Record review of R #33's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 05/29/25, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents or their guardians were aware of the medications they received including the reasons, risks, and benefits of each medication for 2 (R #10 and #13) of 3 (R #10, #13 and #44) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If residents and/or their guardians are not informed of the risks and benefits of each medication, then they are not able to make informed decisions. The findings are: R #10A. Record review of R #10's physicians' orders revealed the following:- 07/11/25: Escitalopram Oxalate oral tablet (antidepressant), 20 mg by mouth one time a day for depression.- 10/02/25: Depakote oral tablet (anticonvulsant), delayed release, 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for anxiety related to traumatic brain injury (TBI; injury to the brain caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head). Start date: 10/02/25.- 10/11/25: Quetiapine Fumarate oral tablet (antipsychotic), 150 mg by mouth at bedtime for anxiety related to TBI and anxiety.- 11/17/25: Hydroxyzine HCI oral tablet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an adequate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 2 (R #10 and #44) of 3 (R #2, #10 and #44) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. If the facility fails to develop and implement an adequate baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for residents, then staff may lack necessary guidance to provide appropriate care which could lead to an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that causes harm to a resident due to medical care or lack of medical care). R #10A. Record review of R #10's face sheet revealed an admission date of 07/05/25 and included the following diagnoses: - Urinary tract infection (UTI; an infection in any part of the urinary system, which includes the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra).- Type 2 diabetes (DM2, a condition which results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar).-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was complete for 1 (R #10) of 3 (R #10, #13 and #44) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not understanding and implementing the most appropriate interventions and treatments for residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #10's face sheet revealed an admission date of 07/05/25 and included diagnoses of blindness and depression. B. Record review of R #10's comprehensive care plans 07/09/25 revealed there was no care plan addressing activities for R #10. C. On 09/30/2025 at 2:48 pm, during an interview, R #10 stated he listens to music and the tv for entertainment but would participate in bingo if someone would help him. He stated he walks throughout the hallway to keep busy sometimes. D. On 11/18/25 at 1:50 pm during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it is the Activities Department's responsibility to create a care plan addressing activities and wasn't sure why one had not been developed. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,839 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,839 — penalty dated 2024-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $804K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM