Desert Springs Health Care LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 74.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 (R #81) of 3 (R #4, R #37, and R #81) residents reviewed for falls when staff failed to provide the required assistance during personal care resulting in R #81 falling from her bed. This deficient practice resulted in R #81 sustaining a fractured (broke) femur (thigh bone) and a fractured finger. The findings are:A. Record review of R #81's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Chronic, systolic (congestive) heart failure (impaired heart function),2. Major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life),3. Morbid (severe) obesity (severely overweight),4. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar),5. Muscle weakness generalized (reduction in the power exerted by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Past Noncompliance: Compliance Date was 04/06/24. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed for falls, when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure beds were fully locked. 2. Ensure staff was familiar with equipment. These deficient practices resulted in R #1 falling and sustaining injuries that required treatment at the hospital. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Type 2 Diabetes. 2. Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). 3. Anxiety. 4. Heart Failure. B. Record review of R #1's nursing progress notes revealed the following: - On 03/21/24, staff documented the resident had a witnessed fall and landed face down. The resident fell out of bed while receiving a bed bath. Witness stated the resident did not lose consciousness when she landed on the floor. - On 03/22/24, staff documented that staff gave the resident a bed bath. When staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for 3 (R #3, R #39, and R #91) of 4 (R #1, R #3, R #39, and R #91) residents reviewed for respiratory care when staff failed to:1. Ensure medical orders indicated when to administer supplemental oxygen (extra oxygen required to support the body's vital functions) needed to R #3 and R #39.2. Ensure a medical order was in place for R #91's supplemental oxygen use. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents receiving too much or not enough oxygen and can lead to worsening of their conditions. The findings are: R #3A. Record review of R #3's admission record revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; a progressive lung condition causing airflow blockage and breathing difficulties),2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by ensuring medications have an adequate indication of use and ensuring indication of use is based off of the residents' current diagnosis for 2 (R #7 and R #11) of 5 (R #2, R #3, R #6, R #7, and R #11) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are: R #7A. Record review of R #7's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Atherosclerotic heart disease (the build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls),2. Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration due to generalized degeneration of the brain),3. Atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass grafts (plaque containing cholesterol and lipids that build up on artery walls),4. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program (a program that is used to prevent, recognize, and control the onset and spread of infections) by not ensuring Enhanced Barrier (EBP) signs are posted outside of rooms with Personal Protective equipment (PPE; protective clothing, face masks, goggles, or other garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection) readily available for 2 (R #37 and R #91) of 7 (R #2, R #5, R #8, R #9, R #10, R #37 and R #91) residents reviewed. These deficiencies place residents at risk of contracting infections, hospitalization, and death. The findings are:R #37A. Record review of R #37's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Focal traumatic brain injury (an external force causes localized damage to an area of the brain),2. Zoster (shingles),3. Elevated white blood cell count (typically means the body…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a choice about aspects of his/her life that are significant to the residents for 1 (R #27) of 3 (R #3, R #27 and R #91) residents by not having a choice to refuse dietician orders. If the facility does not honor residents' choices, then residents are likely to experience a loss of independence and self-worth leading to feelings of frustration and depression.The findings are:A. Record review of R #27's admission record revealed R #27 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Traumatic subdural hemorrhage (SDH; often life-threatening brain injury involving bleeding typically caused during head trauma),2. Anemia (low red blood cell count),3. Retention of Urine (the inability to fully empty the bladder),4. Repeated falls.B. Record review of R #27's Quarterly [NAME] Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 01/12/26 revealed R…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's current advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law and relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated) and New Mexico Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and lifesaving care) matched the order in the electronic health record (EHR) for 2 (R #5 and R #39) of 7(R #5, R #6, R #8, R #9, R #10, R #12, and R #39) residents reviewed for advance directives when staff failed to update the resident's code status. This deficient practice is likely to result in confusion, delay, and residents not having their wishes honored if a life-threatening event occurred. The findings are:R #5A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #5's physician orders dated [DATE], revealed R #5 is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment for 1 (R #42) of 3 (R #2, R #3, and R #42) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' preferences and care needs not being met.The findings are: A. Record review of R #42's admission record revealed he was admitted on [DATE].B. Record review of R #42's physician record revealed the following:1. An order dated 07/04/25 for Zoloft Oral Tablet (antidepressant medication) 100 milligrams (MG). Give 1.5 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression.2. An order dated 09/10/25 for Depakote Sprinkles (anticonvulsant medication) Oral Capsule 125 milligrams (MG). Give two capsules by mouth two times a day for dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment) with behaviors.3. An order dated 12/20/24 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours for 1 (R #11) of 6 (R #1, R #2, R #7, R #8, R #9, and R #11) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. If the facility fails to develop and implement a baseline care plan, then residents might not get the care and services they need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #11's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].B. Record review of R #11's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed no evidence of a baseline care plan.C. Record review of R #11's care plan revealed the care plan was developed and implemented on 10/27/25.D. On 01/30/26 at 4:16 pm, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for R #11. The DON stated that she expects every resident to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an accurate, comprehensive care plan for 1 (R #91) of 4 (R #2, R #3, R #42, and R #91) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to: 1. Develop a care plan to include interventions for R #91's use of oxygen.2. Develop a care plan to include interventions for R #91's use of floor mat.This deficient practice could likely result in proper care not being provided to residents.The findings are: A. Record review of R #91's admission record revealed R #91 was admitted into the facility on [DATE].B. Record review of R #91's care plan dated 01/25/26 revealed the following:1. There was no care plan to include intervention for the use of supplemental oxygen (extra oxygen required to support the body's vital functions),2. There was no care plan to include interventions for the use of a floor mat.C. Record review of R #91's current medical orders revealed the following:1. An order dated 01/29/26 for this resident to use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 1 (R #3) of 5 (R #2, R #3, R #27, R #34 and R #55) residents reviewed when staff failed to revise the care plan to include the current use of oxygen interventions. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's admission record revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; a progressive lung condition causing airflow blockage and breathing difficulties),2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar),3. Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment),B. Record review of R #3's physician record revealed an order dated 08/14/25 for oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate foot care services for 1 (R #77) of 1 (R #77) resident reviewed for toenail care. This deficient practice could likely result in functional decline, pain, and infections. The findings are: A. Record review of R #77's face sheet indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by metabolic disturbances in the body, leading to symptoms such as confusion, memory loss, and altered consciousness),2. Chronic kidney disease (a condition characterized by the gradual loss of kidney function over time, leading to the accumulation of waste and excess fluid in the body),3. Muscle weakness (generalized),4. Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment),5. Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age, due to generalized degeneration of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,215 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,215 — penalty dated 2026-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM