White Sands Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 106.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep a resident free from abuse for 1(R #4) of 8(R #1-8) residents reviewed for abuse when Nurse Aide in Training (NAIT) #2 was verbally and physically abusive to R #4 when providing care. This deficient practice likely resulted (based upon the reasonable person standard) in R #4 experiencing emotional distress and trauma. The findings are:A. Record review of R #4's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment),2. Anxiety (feelings of fear or apprehension) disorder,3. Legal blindness (inability to see),4. Cerebrovascular disease (refers to a group of disorders affecting blood flow to the brain, leading to conditions such as stroke, aneurysms, and vascular malformations).B. Record review of R #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1(R #4) of 8(R #1-8) residents reviewed for abuse, when staff waited 7 days to report witnessed staff to resident abuse. If the staff fail to report allegations of abuse to the facility administration, then corrective measured may not be acted on and the facility would be unable to assure residents are free from abuse. The findings are:Cross reference findings for F600A. Record review of R #4's complaint report dated 08/29/25 revealed on 08/22/25 an alleged incident of abuse had occurred as follows:- Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 had witnessed NAIT (Nurse Aide in Training) #2 cover R #4's mouth with hand, tap his mouth with her hand, and told R #4 to shut up.-The incident was reported to the management team on 08/29/25. NAIT #2 continued to work until management was notified of incident. NAIT #2 remained in the unit and the residents in the unit were at risk for further abuse by the accused NAIT #2.B. Record review of facility timesheets identified that NAIT #1 worked at the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for falls, when the facility failed to ensure staff used a mechanical lift as required.This deficient practice resulted in R #1 falling and sustaining a Subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain) was identified on (Computed Tomography; a medical imaging procedure that uses x-rays to create detailed cross-sectional images of the body) CT that required treatment at a hospital for higher level of care.A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and currently has the following diagnoses:1. Type 2 Diabetes.2. Alzheimer's (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to carry out the simplest tasks).3. Anxiety (feeling of unease, worry, or nervousness).4. Repeated Falls.5. Hypertension (A condition in which the force of the blood against the arty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent from a resident representatives prior to giving a significant haircut to a resident living on the memory care unit for 1 (R #2) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #3 and R #4) residents reviewed. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling a loss of humanity and dignity. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's admission Agreement, dated 12/2023, revealed the facility may share medical information with family to identify a surrogate decision maker when an individual was incapacitated and unable to give or receive information. B. Record review of R #2's admission Record revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), with severe behavioral disturbances,2. History of traumatic brain injury (TBI; head or neck injury). C. Record review of R…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless the medication was medically necessary for 3 (R #2, R #6, and R #9) of 5 (R #2, R #5, R #6, R #9, and R #31) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to:1. Ensure psychotropic medications were necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for R #2.2. Ensure as needed psychotropic medications are limited to only 14 days or indicate the duration of the as needed (PRN) order for R #9.These deficient practices could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are:R #2 A. Record review of R #2's admission Record revealed R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Unspecified mood disorder (mental health condition that is characterized by a persistent feeling of sadness, hopelessness, and loss…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment for 2 (R #9 and R #31) of 4 (R #5, R #9, R #11, and R #31) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' preferences and care needs not being met. The findings are: R #9A. Record review of R #31's physician's orders revealed an order dated 08/13/25 for Aspirin enteric coating (EC; Specialized barrier to oral medications to prevent dissolution in the acidic stomach) oral tablet eighty-one milligrams (mg) to be given by mouth in the morning for analgesic (pain medication).B. Record review of R #31's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed R #9 does not receive scheduled pain medications.C. On 3/12/25 at 10:03 am, during an interview with MDS Coordinator (MDS), she confirmed R #9 's quarterly MDS is inaccurate because she does take Aspirin for pain regularly.R #31D. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) for 2 (R #114 and R #115) of 4 (R #5, R #9, R #114 and R #115) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: R #114 A. Record review of R #114 admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), 2. Hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions when staff failed to follow safe food handling practices when they:1. Touched the rims of cups while serving residents' drinks.2. Failed to sanitize their hands after touching dirty (items that may be soiled or contaminated) and serving residents' meals. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 111 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 03/08/26 and are likely to lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if safe food handling practices are not adhered to and stored properly.The findings are:A. On 03/08/26 at 12:16 pm, an observation of the lunch dining services revealed the following:1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) #3 assisted R #82 into the dining area by holding her hand and walking with her. LVN #3 then served R #92 her lunch meal without washing or sanitizing her hands. 2. LVN #3 served R #47's meal and touched the cup by the top of the rim when placing it on the table.3. LVN #3 served R #36's meal and touched the cup by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level I Identification Screen was accurate for 2 (R #68 and R #98) of 5 (R #1, R #2, R #10, R #68, and R #98) residents reviewed for PASARR screening. If the facility does not ensure PASARR screenings are completed accurately, then residents with serious mental illness may not receive required evaluations or specialized services, placing them at risk for unmet mental health needs and a decline in psychosocial well-being. The findings are:R #68 A. Record review of R #68's admission Record revealed R #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Metabolic encephalopathy (is a change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition), 2. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; is a mental health condition that causes fear, a constant feeling of being overwhelmed and excessive worry about everyday things), 3. Hemiplegia (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 2 (R #8 and R #59) of 8 (R #1, R #2, R #4, R #6, R #7, R #8, R #10, and R #59) residents reviewed when staff failed to: -Revise R #8's care plan using his name, not another resident's name.-Revise R #59's care plan to indicate a fall mat was in use.These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated accurately. The findings are:R #8 A. Record review of R #8's care plan, dated 02/17/26 revealed the following: 1. Focus areas for enhanced barrier precautions revealed Nursing to educate [Name of other resident] and/or family members on the evidence-based practice justification for utilizing enhanced barrier precautions when providing direct care. 2. Focus area for vision revealed the use of another resident's name in the interventions. B. On 03/12/26 at 10:30 am, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) she confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for 1 (R #9) of 5 (R #2, R #4, R #8, R #9, and R #31) residents reviewed for respiratory care when the facility failed to ensure medical orders indicated when to administer R #9's oxygen. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents receiving too much or not enough oxygen and can lead to worsening of their conditions. The findings are:A. Record review of R #9's admission Record revealed R #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment),2. Anxiety (feelings of fear or apprehension),3. Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs),4. Major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain appropriate physician orders prior to installation of bed rails for 1 (R #5) of 3 (R #5, R #11, and R #31) residents reviewed for bedrails. This deficient practice could result in the physician, staff, and residents not knowing the needs, risks and benefits of bed rails. The findings are:A. Record review of R #5's admission Record revealed R #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].B. Record review of R #5's physician orders revealed no order for the use of bedrails.C. On 03/09/26 at 2:12 pm, a random interview and observation of R #5's room revealed quarter size bedrail on the upper left side of the bed. R #5, he confirmed he uses the side rail for mobility and repositioning himself. D. On 03/12/26 at 10:27 am, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed the R #5 does not have physician orders for use of bedrails and should prior to installation of the bedrail.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data daily at the beginning of the shift that included the following:- Facility name.-The current date.-The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift.1. Registered nurse,2. Licensed practical nurse,3. Certified nurse aides,4. Resident census.The deficient practice has the potential to affect all 111 residents as identified by the census provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 03/08/26 and could likely result in residents and visitors not having the staffing information readily available. The findings are:A. On 03/09/26 at 10:01 am a random observation of the facility revealed the facility's staff data posting was dated 03/08/26.B. On 03/09/26 at 10:07 am, during an interview with the Registered Nurse (RN) #1, she confirmed the staff data posting was dated 03/08/26 and had not been updated. She confirmed it should be updated daily but was not.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,528 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $13,250 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-07-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM