Coronado Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 72.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions by not ensuring food items stored in facility's freezer were labeled and dated. This deficient practice is likely to affect 76 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 06/09/25 and could likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 06/09/25 at 11:03 am during observation of the facility's walk in freezer the following items were found open and undated: 1. Two bags of what appeared to be hash browns. 2. Two bags of what appeared to be French fries. B. On 06/09/25 at 11:05 am during an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), he confirmed the items were not labeled and dated. DM stated that doesn't meet his expectations and everything in the fridge/freezer should be labeled and dated.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 5 (R #2, R #23, R #54, R #56 and R #75) of 5 (R #2, R #23, R #54, R #56 and R #75) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Update R #2's care plan to include the use of a trapeze bar (a short horizontal bar that is suspended from two ropes) for mobility. 2. Update R #23's and R #54's plan of care to include hospice (care and services for people nearing the end of life). 3. Update R #56's care plan to remove the use of a communication board (a tool used to help people with limited language skills or who are nonverbal to communicate) with word cards. 4. Update R #75's plan of care to include advanced directive. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: R #2 A. On 06/10/25 at 1:46 pm, an observation of R #2's room revealed a trapeze bar at the head of R #2's bed. B. Record review of R #2's face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent (%) when staff performed 3 medication errors out of 29 opportunities for 3 (R #39, R #43, R #76) of 4 (R #36, R #39, R #43, R #76) residents reviewed during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 10.34%. This deficient practice could likely result in the spread of infectious agents (viruses and bacteria) between the residents. The findings are: A. On 06/12/25 at 9:40 am, during an observation of Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 revealed the following: 1. CMA #1 did not clean the blood pressure cuff and vital sign equipment prior to taking vital signs for R #76. 2. CMA #1 then failed to sanitize her hands before beginning her medication pass for R #39. 3. CMA #1 then failed to put gloves on (don) gloves to open a capsule for R #43. B. On 06/12/25 at 10:15 am during an interview with CMA #1, she confirmed she should have sanitized her hands before beginning the medication pass for R #39. She confirmed she should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights in the residents' rooms were within reach of the residents while in the room for 2 (R #22 and R #56) of 4 (R #2, R #8, R #22, and R #56) residents reviewed for call lights. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being unable to notify staff when they are in need of assistance. The findings are: R #22 A. On 06/12/25 at 10:34 am during an observation of R #22's room revealed R #22 was asleep in her recliner. The call light laid on top of the bed where she could not reach it. B. On 06/12/25 at 10:36 am during an interview with Hospice Nurse (HN) #1, she confirmed the call light was not within R #22's reach and the call light should have been. R #56 C. On 06/11/25 at 8:58 am during an observation of R #56's room, revealed R #56 was asleep in his recliner. The call light laid on top of the bed where he could not reach it. D. On 06/11/25 at 9:05 am during an interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #2, she confirmed the call light was not within R 56's reach and the call light should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the hallway was accessible for residents. This deficient practice could likely result in residents living in an unsafe environment, could increase their risk for injuries, and decrease their quality of life. The findings are: A. On 06/09/25 at 8:10 am a random observation of the [NAME] Wing revealed the following: 1. A medication cart on the right side of the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. A shower chair on the left side of the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. B. On 06/09/25 at 8:18 am during an interview with the Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA), she confirmed there were objects on both sides of the hallway blocking the residents' path. She stated that everything should be on one side of the hallway, so residents had a clear path. C. On 06/10/25 at 8:46 am a random observation of South Wing revealed the following: 1. A medication cart on the right side of the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. A medication cart on the left side of the hallway…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's current advance directive (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and lifesaving care) was available in the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and/or available in physical form for the facility staff for 1 (R #48) of 1 (R #48) resident reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice is likely to cause confusion and delay potentially lifesaving procedures. The findings are: A. Record review of R #48's face sheet revealed R #48 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #48's physician orders dated [DATE] revealed R #48 was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- a person has decided not to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempted on them if their heart or breathing stops) for her advanced directive code status. C. Record review of R #48's care plan dated [DATE] revealed R #48 was a DNR for her advanced directive code status. D. Record review of R #48's EHR revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to keep residents free from physical restraints for 1 (R #8) of 1 (R #8) resident observed during random observations. This deficient practice could likely result in physical restraints being used for discipline or staff convenience; unnecessarily preventing residents from freedom, movement, or activity. The findings are: A. Record review of R #8's face sheet revealed R #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Alzheimer's (a progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out even the simplest tasks), 2. Dementia (a general term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), 3. Depression (persistent feeling of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and changes in appetite, sleep, and energy levels), 4. Cognitive communication deficit (a communication problem stemming from impairments in thinking skills, rather…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit (electronically sending encoded information) a Significant Change (major decline or improvement in the patient's health status) Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment within 14 days after the facility determined a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for 1 (R #23) of 1 (R #23) resident reviewed for MDS assessment timing. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents not receiving the appropriate care and services they need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #23's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; lung disease), 2. Major depressive disorder (depression; a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), 3. Cerebral aneurysm (a weak spot on an artery in the brain that fills with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention practices for 3 (R #39, R #43, and R #76) of 4 (R #36, R #39, R #43, and R #76) residents. This deficient practice could likely result in the spread of infectious agents (viruses and bacteria) between the residents. The findings are: A. On 06/12/25 at 9:40 am, during an observation of Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #1 revealed the following: 1. CMA #1 did not clean the blood pressure cuff and vital sign equipment prior to taking vital signs for R #76. 2. CMA #1 then failed to sanitize her hands before beginning her medication pass for R #39. 3. CMA #1 then failed to put gloves on (don) gloves to open a capsule for R #43. B. On 06/12/25 at 10:15 am, during an interview with CMA#1, she confirmed she should have sanitized her hands before beginning the medication pass for R #39. She confirmed she should have sanitized all vital sign equipment before taking R #76's vitals and in between each resident afterwards. She confirmed she should have donned (put on gloves) her gloves before she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespread
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation confirming one Nurse Aide (NA), employed by the facility, had completed a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) or a Competency Evaluation Program (CEP) within four months of being employed at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Residents are likely to experience substandard care because of the use of untrained or unqualified aides providing direct care to residents. The findings are: A. Record review of NA #1's personnel record revealed the following: - The NA's hire date was 12/01/23; - The record did not contain a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) License. - NA #1 was employed full time as of 05/17/24. - NA #1 completed the CNA training but did not complete the CNA state licensure exam. B. On 05/17/24, at 10:40 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated NA #1 did not obtain her CNA license within four months of her hire date. The DON stated the NA completed the training but did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM