No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunset Villa Healthcare

1515 South Sunset Avenue, Roswell, NM 88203 · For profit - Corporation · 52 certified beds · (575) 623-7097 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)4 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$80,968 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $80,968 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
1110 S Main St · (575) 622-7039 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
800 W Hobbs St · (575) 623-3412 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.7%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.9%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.0%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.8%11.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication36.1%14.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.3%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.2%14.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.4%86.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.8%22.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.1%15.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.421.651.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.642.811.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.6%CMS range 33.9–58.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.2–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.0–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.68
RN hoursweekends
53.4%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 49.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Past Non-Compliance Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent neglect for 1 (R #24) of 1 (R #24) resident reviewed for abuse and neglect when staff failed to complete rounds (process where nursing staff checks on the status or condition of each resident) timely. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #24 laying on the floor in his room after a fall for approximately three hours. The findings are: A. Record review of R #24's admission Record revealed R #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following multiple diagnoses: 1. Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, 2. Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), moderate, 3. Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), severe with behavioral disturbance. 4. Cognitive Communication deficit (a communication difficulty that's caused by a cognitive impairment), 5. Essential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 2 (R #1 and #6) of 2 (R #1 and #6) residents reviewed for falls: 1. When the facility failed to ensure R #1, who was a fall hazard, was not left alone while in the restroom. 2. When therapy failed to use a gait belt for R #6. 3. When the facility failed to immediately assess R #6 following the fall to check for injuries. These deficient practices likely resulted in R #1 and R #6 having falls with injuries that required treatment at the hospital. The findings are: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Myelodysplastic Syndrome (a group of disorders caused by blood cells that are poorly formed or do not work properly). 2. Unsteadiness on feet. 3. Repeated falls. B. B. Record review of R #1's fall risk assessment, dated [DATE], revealed R #1's fall risk score was a 7, moderate fall risk, and required activities of daily living (ADL;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-03-06 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 (R #'s 3, 43, and 51) of 3 (R #'s 3, 43, and 51) residents reviewed for behavioral health concerns received necessary behavioral health care to meet residents needs when staff failed to: 1. Refer R #3 for psychiatric services when staff observed depressive symptoms and R #3 verbalized feelings of depression. 2. Ensure R #43 was receiving psychiatric service to include psychotherapy (talk therapy) to manage depressive symptoms. 3. Refer R #51 for behavioral health services when he was exhibiting disruptive behaviors which resulted in R #51 being transferred to the hospital and not allowed to return to the facility. 4. Document and monitor for depressive symptoms on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for R #3 and R #43 despite staff being aware that these residents had depressive symptoms. These deficient practices likely resulted in behaviors worsening and not receiving the behavioral or mental health care needed to improve mood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1(R #1) of 4 (R #1-4) residents reviewed received treatment and care in a timely manner and in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to identify a change in condition and adequately assess R #1 when she informed the nurse that she thought she was having a stroke and then demonstrated unexplained significant weakness during transfer. Several hours later, R #1 became unresponsive and hypoxic (low oxygen in blood). This deficient practice likely resulted in R #1 experiencing a delay in treatment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1 face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Acute and chronic respiratory failure, with hypoxia (low oxygen) or hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in blood). 2. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia (a group of diseases resulting from damaged or malfunctioning of nerves that causes weakness, numbness, and pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively manage pain for 1 (R #3) of 2 (R #'s 3 and 57) residents reviewed for pain when staff did not assess for pain and provide pain treatment. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #3 experiencing long periods of pain without sufficient relief. A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Pain. 2. Osteoarthritis (Inflammation of one or more joints). 3. Muscle wasting and atrophy (A progressive and degeneration or shrinkage of muscles or nerve tissues). B. Record review of R #3's pain summary, dated January 2024, revealed R #3 experienced the following pain levels: - A score of 0 to 1 means the resident had no pain; 2 to 3 means mild pain; 4 to 5 means discomforting, moderate pain; 6 to 7 means distressing, severe pain; 8 to 9 means intense, very severe pain; and 10 means unbearable pain. - R #3's pain scale rating was a five out of 10, four times during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless the medication was medically necessary for 2 (R #3 and R #37) of 5 (R #1, R #3, R #15, R #37, and R #48) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to:1. Ensure that as needed psychotropic medications are limited to only 14 days or indicate the duration of the as needed (PRN) order for R #3 and R #37.2. Ensure monitoring for possible side effects of an anti-psychotic medication for the duration of the order for R #3.These deficient practices could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are:R #3 A. Record review of R #3's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Anxiety (feelings of fear or apprehension), 2. Depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment accurately reflected residents' clinical status for 2 (R #2 and R #31) of 4 (R #2, R #4, R #9, and R #31) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' needs not being met. The findings are: R #2 A. Record review of R #2's admission Record revealed R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Type two diabetes mellitus (DM2, a metabolic disorder leading to elevated blood glucose), 2. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event, causing flashbacks, nightmares, and severe anxiety), 3. Depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). B. Record review of R #2's physician order dated 12/25/25 revealed amitriptyline (antidepressant medication) 100 milligram…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen (plan to manage a person's medication) was free from unnecessary drugs by ensuring residents receiving diuretic therapy were appropriately monitored for edema for 1 (R #48) of 5 (R #3, R #5, R #15, R #43, and R #48) residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. This deficient practice could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are:A. Record review of R #48's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of:1. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar),2. Long-term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner),3. Edema (swelling caused by excess fluid).B. On 04/20/26 at 11:00 am an observation and interview of R #48 revealed him socializing in the dining room with other residents. Both of his lower legs had visible redness and swelling. R #48 stated that he has swelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed in advance of what medications they received and understood the reasons, risks, and benefits of the medications for 1 (R #48) of 5 (R #3, R #5, R #15, R #43, and R #48) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If the residents or their representatives are not informed of the risks and benefits of the medication or treatment alternatives, they are not able to make informed decisions regarding residents' care. The findings are: A. Record review of R #48's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Anxiety (feelings of fear or apprehension),2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar),3. Cardiac arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat).B. Record review of R #48's physician's orders revealed the following:1. An order dated 07/17/25 for Lorazepam (anti-anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an accurate, comprehensive care plan for 2 (R #5 and R #48) of 5 (R #3, R #5, R #15, R #43 and R #48) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to develop: 1. A care plan with goals and interventions for R #5's diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar). 2. A care plan with goals and interventions for R #48's:-Use of an anticoagulant (medication that prevents blood from clotting) medication,-Diagnosis of edema (swelling caused by excess fluid). This deficient practice could likely result in proper care not being provided to residents.The findings are:R #5A. Record review of R #5's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar).B. Record review of R #5's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quality of care when staff failed to monitor 1 (R #48) of 5 (R #3, R #5, R #15, R #43, and R #48) residents reviewed for edema. These deficient practices could likely result in residents not getting the treatment needed and/or potentially worsening conditions. The findings are: A. Record review of R #48's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of:1. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar),2. Long-term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner),3. Edema (swelling caused by excess fluid).B. Record review of R #48's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the following:1. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; a screening for cognitive impairment) score of 15, cognitively intact.2. R #48 is on a diuretic (a medication that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was in working order for 1 (R #4) of 3 (R #2, R #4, and R #8) residents reviewed during random observation of the facility. If the facility is not ensuring a working call light system, then residents and staff are unable to request immediate assistance when needed. The findings are:A. On 04/20/26 at 9:29 am, during an observation and interview with R #4, she stated she needed help and pushed her call light. She stated nobody was coming. There was no light outside of R #4's room.B. On 04/20/26 at 9:34 am, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed the call light was not working. The DON stated the light bulb must have burnt out.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and neglect to the State Agency within twenty-four hours for 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) of 5 (R #1, R #2, R #3, R #4, and R #6) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. If the facility fails to report allegations of abuse and neglect to the State Agency, then the State Agency is unable to ensure residents are free from abuse and neglect. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Initial Incident Report dated 10/06/25 revealed that on 10/03/25 CNA #1 yanked (pulled) R #1 by her left arm while assisting her into a sitting position and made fun of her financial situation by telling her the driver was going to take her to another facility because she couldn't afford her bills. B. Record review of the facility's Initial Incident Report dated 09/30/25, received by the State Agency on 10/01/25, revealed the following:1. An allegation of neglect where CNA #2 assisted R #2 to bed with a dirty (urine and bowel movement) adult brief on and did not assist with personal care that occurred on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency within five working days of an incident for 3 (R #1, R #5, and R #6) of 6 (R #1, R #2, R #3, R #4, R #5, and R #6) residents reviewed for abuse or neglect. If the facility is not submitting the summary of the facility's investigation to the State Survey Agency, then the State Survey Agency is unable to appropriately triage (review) the allegation for further investigation. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Initial Incident Report dated 10/06/25 revealed an alleged incident of abuse where Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) yanked (pulled) R #1 by her left arm while assisting her into a sitting position which occurred on 10/03/25.B. Record review of the facility's investigation summary, no date, revealed the summary report was submitted to the State Survey Agency on 10/13/25 (six working days after the incident).C. Record review of the facility's Initial Incident Report dated 10/02/25 revealed a resident-to-resident altercation where R #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse for 1 (R #1) of 5 (R #1, R #2, R #3, R #4, and R #5) residents reviewed for abuse when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 was verbally abusive to R #1. This deficient practice led to R #1 feeling embarrassed. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Initial Incident Report dated 10/06/25 revealed that on 10/03/25 CNA #1 yanked (pulled) R #1 by her left arm while assisting her into a sitting position and made fun of her financial situation by telling her the driver was going to take her to another facility because she couldn't afford her bills.B. On 11/20/25 at 1:15 pm, during an interview with R #, she stated she does not feel like CNA #1 meant to hurt her, but she does not like to be rushed, and he was rushing her. R #1 stated he made her feel embarrassed because he was laughing at her financial situation by telling her the driver was going to take her to another facility since she couldn't pay her bills.C. Record review of CNA #1's training file revealed CNA #1 received training on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths or showers for 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are:Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths or showers for 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are:R #1A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Fracture of pelvis (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program (a program that is used to prevent, recognize, and control the onset and spread of infections). This failed practice has the potential to affect all 96 residents living in the facility as identified by the census provided by the Administrator on 12/08/24. This deficient practice could likely result in the spread of infectious diseases. A. On 02/03/25 at 6:00 am, during a random observation of the facility, signs indicated enhanced barrier precautions were on the doorways of rooms 102, 109, 110, and 120. B. Record review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy and Process Surveillance and Reporting policy, revision date of 06/2020, revealed the following: 1. The Infection Preventionist coordinates the development and monitoring of the facility's established infection control policies and procedures. 2. Reporting information related to compliance with the facility's established infection control policies and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a comprehensive antibiotic stewardship program (a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use). This failed practice has the potential to affect all 45 residents in the facility. Residents identified on the matrix provided by the Administrator on 02/03/25. This deficient practice could likely result in the inappropriate use of antibiotics that can lead to resistance of multi-drug resistant organisms. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship policy, revision date of 06/20 revealed The Infection Control Committee (ICC) will review infections and monitor antibiotic usage patterns on a regular basis. In addition, the ICC will obtain and review results from microbial cultures, resistant organisms, alerts and antibiograms from the lab for tends of resistance. B. On 02/05/25 at 2:30 pm during an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP), he confirmed he does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 3 (R #5, R #24, and R #34) of 6 (R #1, R #5, R #17, R #24, R #34, and R #39) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: R #5 A. Record review of R #5's admission Record revealed R #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: 1. Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia (a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar), 2. Heart failure, 3. Bipolar Disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), 4. Cellulitis (deep inflammation of the tissues just under the skin; caused by infection) of unspecified part of limb, 5. Unspecified dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 2 (R #5 and R #24) of 6 (R #1, R #5, R #17, R #24, R #34, and R #39) residents reviewed for pain medication management. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: R #5 A. Record review of R #5's admission Record revealed R #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #5's electronic files revealed a physician order for oxycodone (pain medication) dated 01/29/25 to be administered every six (6) hours as needed for pain. C. Record review of R #5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of February 2025, revealed R #5 was not administer oxycodone but has an active order that is available to be administered. D. Record review of R #5's comprehensive care plan revised on 01/31/25 revealed the comprehensive care plan did not include the use of pain medications and interventions for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who had completed and signed a consent form for influenza (flu, infection of the nose, throat and lungs caused by a virus) vaccine actually received the vaccination for 1 (R #9) of 5 (R #7, R #9, R #10, R #14, and R #27) residents reviewed for immunizations. If residents are not vaccinated appropriately for influenza, then they have a higher likelihood of contracting the illness and spreading the flu to other residents in the facility. The findings are: A. Record review of R #9's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the following: 1. The last influenza vaccine was received on 09/21/22. 2. History of vaccinations indicated the last flu shot was given on 09/21/22. 3. R #9 signed a consent for the influenza vaccine on 11/28/24. The EHR did not indicate the resident received the vaccination. B. On 02/06/2025 at 12:40 pm, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed R #9 had not yet received influenza vaccination after consenting for the vaccination. She was unable to confirm why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer COVID-19 (an acute respiratory disease in humans characterized mainly by fever and cough and capable of progressing to severe symptoms and in some cases death, especially in older people and those with underlying health conditions) vaccinations to 4 (R #7, R #9, R #10, and R #14) of 5 (R #7, R #9, R #10, R #14, and R #27) residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. This deficient practice could likely result in residents getting COVID-19. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of R #7's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the record did not contain any COVID-19 vaccine forms which indicated staff offered or administered the COVID-19 vaccine to the resident. B. On 02/06/24 at 12:40 pm, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed R #7's EHR does not contain any evidence that the facility offered the COVID-19 vaccination to R #7. R #9 C. Record review of R #9's EHR revealed the last COVID-19 vaccination that R #9 received was on September 21, 2022. D. On 02/06/24 at 12:40 pm, during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed when they failed to ensure personal privacy while dressing in her room. This deficient practice is likely to cause residents to feel exposed and unimportant. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: 1. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic disease that occurs when the body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels), 2. Degenerative disease of nervous system, unspecified (a condition that causes nerve cells in the brain or spinal cord to die with no known reason), 3. Altered mental status, unspecified (a significant change in a person's mental function, affecting their awareness, cognition, and behavior with no known reason), 4. Need for assistance with personal care. B. Record review of R #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment that was in good condition for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) resident reviewed for a homelike environment by not repairing the wall and the blinds in his room. Failure to maintain and provide a comfortable environment is likely to result in residents feeling unimportant and undervalued. The findings are: A. On 02/03/25 at 7:54 am, during an interview with R #5 he pointed to the sliding glass door in his room which had several broken and missing blinds and stated he has asked maintenance to fix them but hasn't heard anything. R #5 stated the blinds have been broken and missing for months, but could not remember exactly how long. B. On 02/05/25 at 3:16 pm, an observation of R #5's room revealed the following: 1. A section of the wall by the bed measuring approximately six feet by three feet had paint that was scrapped and was peeled. 2. The sliding glass door had several broken and missing blinds. C. On 02/05/25 at 3:46 pm, during an interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) for 2 (R #34 and R #38) of 3 (R #24, R #34, and R #38) residents reviewed for care plans. If baseline care plans are not accurate then residents may not get the appropriate care which could lead to an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that causes harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care). The findings are: R #34 A. Record review of R #34's admission Record revealed R #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: 1. Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (when the lungs are unable to adequately provide oxygen to the body, resulting in low blood oxygen levels (hypoxia) that occur suddenly and require immediate medical attention), 2. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI; an infection in any part of the urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for dressing for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: 1. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic disease that occurs when the body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels), 2. Degenerative disease of nervous system, unspecified (a condition that causes nerve cells in the brain or spinal cord to die with no known reason), 3. Altered mental status, unspecified (a significant change in a person's mental function, affecting their awareness, cognition, and behavior with no known reason), 4. Need for assistance with personal care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed maintain adequate hydration for 1 (R #24) of 1 (R #24) resident reviewed for dehydration when staff failed to: 1. Offer R #24 a drink when staff enter his room, 2. Document and monitor R #24's fluid intakes daily. If residents are not assisted with hydration support, then residents are likely to experience dehydration which could lead to other health problems. The findings are: A. Record review of R #24's admission Record revealed R #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, 2. Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), moderate, 3. Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), severe with behavioral disturbance. 4. Cognitive Communication deficit (a communication difficulty that's caused by a cognitive impairment), 5. Essential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with a proper open date or expiration date. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact the health of all residents, if staff administered or used potentially compromised or contaminated medications. The findings are: A. On 02/06/25 at 5:40 am, during an observation of the Medication Storage room, three opened bottles of generic throat spray was not labeled with an open date and a readable expiration date. B. On 02/06/25 at 5:45 am, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she confirmed the three bottles of throat spray were opened, the expiration date was unreadable and an open date had not been written on the bottles. She confirmed she was unable to determine when the throat sprays were opened and could not determine expiration because the manufacturers expiration dates were unreadable. She confirmed the expiration dates should be clear and readable. C. On 02/03/25 at 9:05 am, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed the opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medication carts were locked while not in use. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 19 people residing in rooms 100-111 as identified by the resident census provided by the Administrator on 06/06/24 by allowing unauthorized persons access to their medications and personal health information. The findings are: A. On 06/06/24 at 10:52 am, during a random observation of the facility, the medication cart located near the nurse's station was unlocked, and staff were not in the area. Further observation revealed R #3, R #4, and R #5 were present in the area. B. On 06/06/24 at 10:57 am, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), he confirmed the medication cart was unlocked, and facility employees were not in the area. The DON stated an unattended, unlocked medication cart did not meet his expectations, because it should have been left locked if a nurse was not present and working out of it.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 2 (R #1 and #3) of 2 (R #1 and #3) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in a decline in the residents' conditions due to staff not being aware of the care residents need. The findings are: R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's baseline care plan, dated 04/07/24, revealed only the Social Services section was completed. Sections: Nursing Services, Rehabilitative Services, Nutritional Services, and Activities were blank and incomplete. C. On 06/06/24 at 6:07 pm, during an interview with the Regional Clinical Consultant (RCC), she confirmed R #1's baseline care plan was incomplete and should not have been. D. On 06/07/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans when the facility failed to have a current plan in place. Failure to have a current comprehensive person-centered care plan in place may result in staff not understanding and implementing the needs and treatments of residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's Face Sheet revealed R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #2's care plan, dated 04/24/24, revealed all items listed as canceled which indicated the resident did not have a current care plan in place. C. On 06/06/24 at 6:24 pm, during an interview with Regional Nurse she stated she did not see a current care plan for R #2. She confirmed R #2 did not have a current, updated care plan to implement due to all items listed in the care plan were canceled.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to have a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional direct the the activity program in the facility for all the residents who resided in the facility. If the facility is not providing activity programs for residents to participate in then residents are likely to get bored and their interests not being met. The findings are A. On 03/03/24 at 3:54 pm during an interview with the Administrator (ADM), she said the facility did not have an Activities Director since Valentine's Day weekend (02/11/24) to run the activity program. The ADM stated the Director Of Rehabilitation (DOR) provided some activities when he could, but she did not believe the DOR was certified as an activities professional. B. On 03/05/24 3:26 PM during an interview with the Regional Manager, he stated the facility's Activities Director did not work at the facility since February, and the facility did not have an Activities Director at this time. He stated the facility did not currently have an activity schedule or an organized activity program.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served to residents in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to: 1. Ensure all food items in the kitchen were stored properly. 2. Ensure the kitchen refrigerators were clean. 3. Ensure the drain under the stove and the side of the oven are free from grime and dirt. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 49 residents identified on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 03/02/24. If the facility does not follow food safety guidelines, then they are likely to expose residents to food borne illnesses. The findings are: Food Storage findings: A. Observation on 03/04/24 at 7:42 am of the facility's food preparation area, revealed the following: 1. A two pound (lb.) frozen buffet ham wrapped in a plastic bag sat on a prep table and was thawing. 2. The refrigerator door in the kitchen was visibly dirty with drips and splatters, and the inside had spilled substances on the bottom of the refrigerator. 3. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide behavioral health (the emotions and behaviors that affect your overall well-being) care training for 31 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs # 1-31) out of 31 (# 1-31) CNAs in the facility. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the services necessary to attain or maintain their physical, mental, and psychosocial (involving both psychological and social aspects) well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility diagnosis report (list of residents), dated 03/06/24, revealed the facility had 26 residents diagnosed with a form of dementia or Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior). B. Record review of the facility in-services (multiple dates throughout 2023 and the beginning of 2024) and training sign-in sheet (form used to track staff attendance dated 06/05/23 and 06/06/23) for CNAs revealed the record did not contain any documentation to show the facility's 31 CNAs had behavioral health and dementia care-related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote residents' choices for 2 (R #'s 5 and 32) of 2 (R #'s 5 and 32) residents reviewed for choices when staff failed to: 1. Ensure medical appointments were not missed due to lack of transportation for R #5. 2. Ensure R #32 was taken outdoors per her preference. These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident's personal choices, needs, and preferences not being honored. The findings are: Findings for R #5: A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. On 03/02/24 during an interview with R#5's daughter, she stated her mother missed appointments, because there was not a driver to take R#5. C. On 03/03/24 at 1:20 PM, during an interview with Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed R #5 missed a podiatry appointment on 01/05/24 due to staffing. The DON stated they had to reschedule R #5's appointment to the podiatrist on 02/27/24, because there was not a driver to take the resident. D.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist or provide an opportunity for residents to organize a facility resident council for all 49 residents as listed on the Resident Census provided by the Administrator on 03/02/24. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not feeling heard or feeling as if their concerns are not important. The findings are: A. Record review of resident council meeting minutes revealed the last resident council meeting occurred on 09/12/23. B. On 03/02/24 at 4:13 pm during an interview with Administrator (ADM) , the ADM stated the facility did not have an Activities Director, so the resident council did not meet on a regular basis. C. On 03/03/24 at 11:00 am during interview with R #s 8, 11, 26, 29, 43, and 47 at the Resident Council discussion, residents in attendance stated a resident council meeting was not scheduled for months. None of the residents in attendance could remember when the last meeting was held.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 49 residents living in the facility as listed on the Resident Census provided by the Administrator on 03/02/24. Failure to maintain the building in a clean and comfortable manner is likely to prevent residents from enjoying everyday activities. The findings are: A. On 03/02/24 at 9:49 am during a random observation of R #5's room, there was a strong smell of urine, the floor was sticky, and there was an unknown dried substance on the floor. R #5's bed did not have sheets on it. The trash can was full of trash. B. On 03/04/24 at 11:14 am during a random observation of R #28's room, there was trash, dirt, and an unknown dried brown substance on the floor. The trash can was full of trash. C. On 03/02/24 at 10:16 am during an interview with Housekeeper (HK) #1, she stated she was not sure if staff cleaned R #28's room the day before (03/01/24), but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised for 5 (R #'s 29, 31, 34, 37, 44) of 5 (R #'s 29, 31, 34, 37, 44) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to: 1. Conduct quarterly care plan meetings as required for R #29. 2. Update a care plan to reflect antipsychotic medication (medications that mainly treat psychosis-related conditions and symptom) use and falls for R #31. 3. Update a care plan to reflect information regarding falls for R #37. 4. Update a care plan to accurately reflect information regarding falls, removal of catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid), and the use of fall mat (a mat placed on the floor beside a resident's bed in case a resident falls out of bed) for R #44. These deficient practices are likely to result in staff not being aware of residents' care needs and preferences, and residents not receiving the needed care. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for 1 (R #3) of 2 (R #'s 3 and 35) residents reviewed when staff failed to schedule an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; medical imaging technique that uses a magnetic field and radio waves to create detailed images of the organs and tissues in your body) appointment for R #3 per physician orders. If the facility is not scheduling MRI appointments per physician orders, then residents are likely to not receive the therapeutic benefits and care needed. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Pain. 2. Osteoarthritis (Inflammation of one or more joints). 3. Muscle wasting and atrophy (A progressive and degeneration or shrinkage of muscles or nerve tissues). B. Record review of R #3's physician orders revealed the following: 1. Order dated 01/20/24 for non-contrast MRI of right hip for severe pain to rule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) assistance for baths and showers for 2 (R #'s 24 and 32) of 2 (R #'s 24 and 32) residents reviewed for ADL care when staff failed to: 1. Offer R #'s 24 and 32 at least three showers a week. 2. Document when a resident refused any bath or shower. These deficient practices are likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of shower schedule revealed residents occupying the A beds receive a bath/showers on Monday, Wednesday and Fridays. Residents occupying B bed receive a shower/bed bath on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturdays. R #24: B. Record review of R #24's face sheet revealed R #24 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and resided in Bed-A. C. Record review of R #24's care plan, dated 04/17/23, revealed the following: - Focus: R #24's vision was highly impaired. She had a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (complication of diabetes where blood vessels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an on-going program of activities designed to meet the interests and well-being for 7 (R #'s 6, 9,16, 29, 30, 32, and 33) of 7 R #'s 6, 9,16, 29, 30, 32, and 33) residents reviewed for activities when staff failed to: 1. Offer one-to-one activities to residents that stay in their rooms or are bed bound for R #'s 6, 9,16, 29, 30, 32, and 33. If residents are not provided or encouraged to attend or participate in activities that meet their interests, are enjoyable, and enhance their social and emotional well-being, then they are likely to experience an increase in boredom, isolation, and depression. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility activity quarterly assessments revealed the following: 1. R #6's dated 02/06/24: Chooses not to participate in group activities (large/small) and Participates in: one-to-one visits. 2. R #9's dated 02/05/24: Participates in one-to-one programs and Participates in: one-to-one visits. 3. R #16's dated 01/10/24: Participates in one-to-one programs. 4. R #29's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's hearing was maintained with functioning hearing aides for 1 (R #24) of 1 (R #24) resident. This deficient practice is likely to result in the resident not being able to understand when people communicate with her and her needs not being met. The findings are: A. Record review of R #24's face sheet revealed R #24 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #24's care plan, dated 04/17/23, revealed the following: - Focus: R #24 had decreased social involvement due to hearing loss. She stated the feeling of unease being around others. She refused to participate with activities, often occasionally joining for a few minutes and assisting to go back to her room. - Interventions: Ensure that adaptive equipment (any tool used to help or assist a person to accomplish activities of daily living) that R #24 needed was provided and was present and functional. Staff will encourage and assist R #24 with the use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they had sufficient staff to meet the needs of all 49 residents residing in the facility when staff failed to offer baths or showers to residents as scheduled. This deficient practice is likely to negatively impact the comfort, the dignity, and the health of the residents. The findings are: Bath/Shower Findings: R #24: A. Record review of R #24's face sheet revealed R #24 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #24's care plan, dated 04/17/23, revealed the following: - Focus: R #24's vision was highly impaired. She had a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy [complication of diabetes where blood vessels in the eye are damaged] related to diabetes. She was at risk for falls and injuries related to visual deficit. - Interventions: Give verbal reminders not to ambulate or transfer without assistance. Staff will announce themselves when entering room, talking to her when doing activities of daily living (ADLs),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility monitored for the use of psychotropic medications (any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior) for 1 (R #'s 17 and 37) of 3 (R #'s 17, 31, and 37) residents reviewed when staff failed to attempt to gradually reduce the dose (lower dose/quantity of medication administered) for a psychotropic medication. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents being administered unnecessary medication and being over medicated. The findings are: R #17: A. Record review of R #17's face sheet revealed R #17 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #17's physician orders, dated 03/06/23, revealed an order for mirtazapine oral tablet, 7.5 milligrams (mg). Give one tablet by mouth at bedtime related to depression. C. Record review of R #17's pharmacy recommendations, dated 06/29/23, revealed gradual dose reduction attempt for mirtazapine, 7.5 mg. The Pharmacist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and other medical supplies were not expired. This deficient practice is likely to result in medications losing their potency. The findings are: A. On [DATE] at 2:39 PM, observation of the East Wing Medication Cart revealed the following: 1. One bottle of expired hand sanitizer with the expiration date of [DATE]. 2. Three Levemir FlexPens were past the manufacturer's recommended disposal date. The opened documented dates on the pens were: - Pen #1, [DATE]. The pen was 77 days past recommended disposal date. - Pen #2, [DATE]. The pen was 59 days past recommended disposal date. - Pen #3, [DATE]. The pen was 53 days past recommended disposal date. B. Record Review of the manufacturer disposal recommendation for Levemir FlexPens (medication used to control high blood sugar) revealed, Dispose after 42 days, even if there is insulin left in the pen or vial after opening. C. On [DATE] at 2:50 PM, during an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain confidential records by leaving medical information visible to other residents, visitors, and unauthorized staff for 25 (R #'s 2, 7, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 21, 22, 24, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 39, 43, 44, 46, 47, 55, and 56) residents out of all 49 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 03/02/24. This deficient practice would likely result in residents not having confidentiality of their medical information. The findings are: A. On 03/02/24 at 10:10 AM, during an observation of the medication cart on the [NAME] Wing, a clipboard with a list of all [NAME] Wing residents was face up and visible to anyone who walked by the unattended cart. The list on the clipboard contained the following protected health information (PHI; any information that relates to an individual's health status, medical history, or treatment): - Residents #2, 12, 16, 17, 21, 24, 30, 35, 36, 37, and 43 code status (treatment a person would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop). -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a functioning call light system for 1 (R #28) of 1 (R #28) residents reviewed for call lights. If the facility fails to have call lights that are not functioning, residents cannot call staff in case of an emergency or get their needs met by the facility. The findings are: A. Record review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, dated 09/12/23, revealed the call light in R #28's room number was not working. B. On 03/02/24 at 9:15 AM during interview, R #28 stated his call light did not function for awhile but could not remember how long. R #28 stated the facility was aware the light was not functioning because it was discussed in a Resident Council meeting. C. On 03/02/24 at 9:24 AM during observation of R #28's room, the call light was activated by surveyor. The light outside of R #28's room did not light up, and there were not any other visible signs the call light was activated. D. On 03/04/24 at 9:52 am, during an interview and observation with the Maintenance Manager (MM), he stated all call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide training for 2 certified nurse aides (CNAs #6 and #7) of 5 CNAs ( #1, 2, 5, 6, and 7) on the facility's policies and procedures for reporting abuse or neglect. This failure had the potential to affect all 49 residents as indicated on the facility census provided by the administrator on 03/02/24. This deficient practice is likely to result in staff not knowing what constitutes abuse or neglect or how to report abuse or neglect. A. Record review of the facility staffing list revealed the following: 1. CNA #6 was hired on 03/01/23. 2. CNA #7 was hired on 03/01/23. B. Record review of the facility in-services (multiple dates throughout 2023 and the beginning of 2024) and training sign-in sheet (form used to track staff attendance dated 06/05/23 and 06/06/23) revealed CNA #6 and CNA #7 did not receive the required the reporting of abuse, neglect, and exploitation training. C. Record review of the facility staffing schedule dated February 2024 revealed CNA #7 worked 15 shifts throughout the month. CNA #6 was on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required in-service training of no less than 12 hours per year for 1 (CNA #5) of 5 (CNA #1, #2, #5, #6, and #7) CNAs randomly reviewed for required in-service training. This deficient practice is likely to result in the nurses aide's not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility staffing list revealed CNA #5 was hired on 03/01/23. B. Record review of the facility's CNA 12 hour in-service training revealed CNA #5 was not found on any in-service training, which indicated CNA #5 did not have the required 12 hours of annual in-service training. C. Record review of the facility staffing schedule, dated February 2024, revealed CNA #5 worked four shifts during the month. D. Record review of the facility staffing schedule, dated March 2024, revealed CNA #5 was scheduled to work four shifts throughout the month. E. On 03/06/24 at 11:07 am during an interview with the Regional Clinical Consultant (RCC),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to allow 1 (R #51) of 1 (R #51) resident to return to the facility after a hospitalization on 12/05/23. If the facility fails to allow a residents to return to the facility then residents are likely to feel unwanted and feeling as if they have no place to go. The findings are: A. Record review of R #51's face sheet revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Muscle wasting and atrophy, multiple sites [the wasting (thinning) or loss of muscle tissue]. 2. Dysphasia (A condition with difficulty in swallowing food or liquid). 3. Other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness (problems remembering, difficulty speaking, and difficulty understanding). 4. Mixed receptive-expressive language disorder (a disorder that affects both receptive and expressive areas of communication). 5. Cerebral palsy, unspecified (a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture). 6.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for 1 (R #32) of 1 (R #32) residents reviewed by not providing restorative physical therapy service devices as ordered by a physician. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents having a decreased in mobility and pain, causing psychosocial harm and despair. The findings are: A. Record review of R #32's face sheet revealed R #32 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #32's care plan, dated 06/11/23, revealed the following: - Focus: R #32 required extensive assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and mobility. She was at risk for further ADL decline related to generalized health decline. - Interventions: Apply carrot (therapy device designed to be gently inserted into the hand and drawn into place with a plastic wand without causing discomfort) to left hand as tolerated. C. Record review of R #32's physician orders, dated 01/17/24, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This was cited as past non-compliance Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5-9) residents reviewed for elopement risks received the appropriate supervision to prevent or minimize the risk of elopement (an unauthorized departure of a patient from an around-the-clock care setting.) This deficient practice could likely put residents of elopement. The findings are: A. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed R #5 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #5's Care Plan revealed: 1. On 05/26/23, R #5 exhibited wandering behavior that put him at risk for injury. He had diagnosis of dementia. 2. Initiated 07/25/23 and revised 09/10/23: R #5 was at risk for elopement related to impaired safety awareness, wandered in the afternoon and early evenings, knocked on doors and looked for his brother and/or the bathroom. No observed attempts at exit seeking; easily redirected. C. Record review of R #5's Elopement Risk Evaluation, dated 07/31/23, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents obtained routine dental care for 1 (R #30) of 1 (R #30) residents reviewed for dental services. This failure is likely to result in the resident experiencing pain and potential weight loss. The findings are: A. On 03/02/24 at 2:52 PM, during an interview with R #30's power of attorney (POA), he stated R #30 had one denture (could not remember if it is upper or lower) and natural teeth. He further stated R #30 did not go to the dentist since her admission to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of the Social Services Director (SSD) Note, dated 02/09/24, revealed a referral for dental services was sent to [name of dental service used by facility] for R #30. C. On 03/03/24 at 4:43 PM, during an interview with SSD, she stated a dental referral was sent on 02/09/24 to [name of dental service used by facility], and she is waiting for an update. The SSD stated she made a follow-up call on 02/10/24 and was told the person in charge of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide assistive devices for 1 (R #28) of 1 (R #28) residents reviewed during dining observation. If residents are not provided special eating equipment as needed, then residents might be unable to consume their meals and beverages and is likely to result in weight loss, malnutrition, and dehydration. The findings are: A. Record review of R #28's meal ticket, dated 03/02/24, revealed staff to serve R #28 food in a divided plate (plate that is separated into sections). B. Record review of R #28's current physician orders revealed an order for use of a divided plate to facilitate self-feeding. C. On 03/03/24 at 12:05 PM during a random observation, R #28 ate lunch in the dining room, but R# 28 did not have a divided plate. D. On 03/03/24 at 12:18 PM during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, he stated staff did not serve R #28's lunch on a divided plate, and a divided plate should have been provided.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff offered COVID-19 (a highly infectious viral disease) vaccinations to 1 (R #35) of 5 (R #'s 2, 6, 21, 29, and 35) residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccines. This deficient practice could likely result in residents at risk of exposure to COVID-19 related infections. The findings are: A. Record review of R #35's face sheet revealed R #35 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #35's immunizations in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R #35's last COVID-19 vaccine was on 09/21/22. C. Record review of R #35's miscellaneous page in the EHR revealed the record did not contain any COVID-19 vaccine forms which indicated staff offered or administered the vaccine to the resident after 09/21/22 . D. On 03/02/24 at 2:44 pm during an interview with R #35, he stated he had a history of respiratory infections and was not offered a COVID-19 vaccine within the past year. R #35 stated he would receive a COVID-19 vaccine if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$80,968 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $48,109 — penalty dated 2024-06-07
  • $32,859 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASA HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
CALIBER ADVISORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
HATTERAS INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2025
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2025
KAPLAN, MOSHAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2025
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
1515 S SUNSET AVE NM, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
HALLMARK ADVISORS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
HANSEN HUNTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/2025
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
OPCO NM SKILLED MGMT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
THE WRIGHT GROUP CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
WILSHIRE HEALTH REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
ROY, AMANDAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2024
STOLARCZYK, LISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense30% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 6%Other / private 9%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$417per resident / day
operating cost
$12,677per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$357per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325117. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next