No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Socorro Wellness & Rehabilitation

1203 Highway 60 West, Socorro, NM 87801 · For profit - Individual · 66 certified beds · (575) 835-2724 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (575) 835-2724 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
801 N California St · (575) 835-2980 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
312 N California St · (575) 835-2125 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
405 N California St · (505) 401-6834 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Plaza St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.9%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%2.0%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%11.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.4%14.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.8%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.7%14.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.4%86.4%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.851.651.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.272.811.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.61
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
50.7%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 58.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-16)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store medications, which could affect all 59 residents in the facility (Residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the ADON on 12/09/25), when they failed to: 1. Ensure medications were not expired in the medication room. 2. Ensure medications were not expired in the electronic medication management dispensing machine. This deficient practice could likely result in residents obtaining medications that are no longer effective, resulting in adverse side effects. The findings are: A. On 12/11/25 at 11:32 AM, during an observation of the medication room, revealed the following: 1. Medication Storage Cabinets a. One (1) bottle of Daily Multivitamin tablets with an expiration date of 08/2025. b. One (1) bottle of Daily Multivitamin tablets with an expiration date of 11/2025. c. One (1) bottle of Ibuprofen (pain reliever) 200 mg tablets with an expiration date of 09/2025. 2. Electronic medication dispensing machine a. One (1) tablet of amlodipine (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 5 mg with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-16 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit direct care staffing information to the federal agency overseeing certification for long term care facilities for Quarter #4 (July 1, 2024-September 30, 2024). This has the potential to affect all 59 residents in the facility, (residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the ADON on (12/08/25). This deficient practice could likely result in inaccurate direct care staffing information for residents/facility. The findings are:A. Record review of Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (report from the database of the federal agency overseeing certification for long term care facilities) dated Quarter #4 (July 1, 2024-September 30, 2024), revealed no licensed nursing coverage for 24 hours/day for the following dates: 1. 07/14/24, 2. 08/4/24, 3. 08/11/24, 4. 08/18/24, 5. 08/25/24, 6. 09/1/24, 7. 09/8/24, 8. 09/13/24, 9. 09/14/24, 10. 09/15/24, 11. 09/21/24, 12. 09/22/24, 13. 09/28/24. B. On 12/12/2025 at12:47 PM, during an interview with Regional Director, he stated that this company took over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless there was adequate monitoring for any adverse consequences resulting from the medication for 1 (R #8) of 5 (R #3, R #8, R #25, R #36, and R #70) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to: 1. Ensure psychotropic medications were prescribed to treat a specific psychiatric diagnosis (mental illness, symptoms or condition that greatly disturbs your thinking, moods, and/or behavior). 2. Perform an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale test used in medicine to assess side effects of antipsychotic medication) assessment to monitor antipsychotic (a class of psychotropic medication primarily used to manage psychosis, principally in schizophrenia but also in a range of other psychotic disorders) medication. These deficient practices could likely result in residents receiving medications without a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the required discharge or transfer information to the resident and the resident's representatives in writing for 3 (R #2, R #5, and R #66) of 3 (R #2, R #5, and R #66) residents sampled for hospitalizations, when staff failed to: 1. Notify the residents and resident representative(s) of the resident's transfer to the hospital in writing and in a language and manner they understand for R # 2 and R #5. 2. Ensure residents or their representative received a written notice of the bed hold policy which indicated the duration the bed would be held for R #66. These deficient practices could likely result in the resident and/or their representative not knowing the reason for a transfer or discharge, the location of the transfer or discharge, their rights to advocate and make informed decisions regarding the resident's healthcare, the services that the resident received while at the facility, the resident's current health status, or the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 4 (R #2, R #25, R #69, and R #70) of 5 (R #2, R #7, R #25, R #69, and R #70) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (plan that has measurable goals and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental health and psychosocial needs). This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: R #2 A. Record review of R #2's admission documents, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #2 had the following diagnoses: a. Infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling ureteral stent (infection or swelling due to a thin, flexible tube placed in the ureter (the tube from kidney to bladder) to keep it open, allowing urine to flow past blockages like kidney stones or after surgery, often causing symptoms like frequent urination, burning, urgency, or blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revisions occurred for 6 (R #7 R #8, R #17, R #25, R #36, and R #60) of 8 (R #5, R #6, R #7, R #8, R #17, R #25, R #36, and R #60) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy when the staff failed to revise the care plan with the most current resident information. This deficient practice could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of R #7's admission record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #7 had the following diagnoses: a. Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lungs consistently can't get enough oxygen into the blood). b. Simple chronic bronchitis (a condition causing a persistent,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #6) of 2 (R #5 and R #6) residents when staff failed to: 1. Identify open wounds on R #6's lower legs. 2. Follow up on the burning sensation when R #6 urinated. These deficient practices could likely lead to residents needs not being met and/or a worsening of their condition. The findings are:A. On 12/10/25 at 10:10 AM, during an interview, R #6 stated he was in a lot of pain. He stated that it burned really bad when he urinated and that it was almost unbearable. R #6 also stated that his legs hurt really bad. R #6 further stated he had told staff but that nothing had been done about it. R #6 stated that he has told several staff that he was hurting for months. R #6 stated that he had been in pain for about 3 months. B. On 12/10/25 at 1:54 PM, during an observation of R #6's legs, revealed resident's lower legs were discolored and there were open wounds and scabbing on both legs. C. Record review of R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for oxygen therapy for 3 (R #7, R #69, and R #76) of 3 (R #7, R #69, and R #76) residents reviewed for respiratory care, when staff failed to: 1. Ensure residents wore their oxygen continuously for R #7 and R #76. 2. Ensure oxygen concentration was administered per physician's order for R #69. 3. Document respiratory assessments (a systematic evaluation of breathing, using inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation to check vital signs, observe breathing patterns, feel the chest, tap for sounds, and listen with a stethoscope for lung sounds and chest movement) for R #69. If the facility is not assessing respiratory status and following orders for oxygen use then the resident may be low on oxygen, which could potentially cause health concerns such as shortness of breath, confusion, rapid heart rate, fatigue, and blue skin (cyanosis). The findings are:R #7 A. Record review of R #7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents obtained dental services for 4 (R #6, R #7, R #36, and R #60) of 8 (R #4, R #5, R #6, R #7, R #10, R #17, R #36, and R #60) residents sampled for dental services, when staff failed to: 1. Schedule a follow up visit for R #6. 2. Schedule routine annual dental services for R #7 and R #60. 3. Schedule dental services for R #7's broken tooth. 4. Schedule dental services after R #36 lost her dentures. This deficient practice is likely to cause the resident unnecessary pain, embarrassment over the condition/appearance of teeth, and potential dental or oral complications. R #6 A. Record review of R #6's admission record, no date, revealed R #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 12/10/25 at 10:05 AM, during an interview, R #6 stated that he has problems with his teeth. R #6 stated he was supposed to go the dentist, but that staff has not made an appointment for him. C. On 12/12/25 at 10:27 AM, during an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 3 (R #7, R #69, and R #76) of 3 (R #7, R #69, and R 76) residents reviewed for respiratory treatment when staff failed to: 1. Document oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides concentrated oxygen to people with breathing problems by taking in ambient air, removing nitrogen and impurities, and delivering purified, oxygen-enriched air through a nasal cannula or mask) rates for residents requiring oxygen for R #7, R #69, and R #76. 2. Ensure resident's orders entered in the computer matched the admitting orders for R #69 and R #76. These deficient practices have the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to missing or inaccurate records and resident information. The findings are: R #7 A. Record review of R #7's admission documents, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #7 had the following diagnoses:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation of resident funds (the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's money without the resident's consent) to the State Agency within 24 hours of allegation for 1 (R #36) of 2 (R #2 and R #36) residents reviewed for misappropriation of funds, when staff failed to report allegations of missing money. If the facility fails to report allegations of misappropriation of resident funds to the state agency within 24 hours of the allegation, then corrective action may not be taken, and residents may suffer increased anxiety and fear that their money is not being protected. The findings are: A. Record review of R #36's admission documents, no date, revealed R #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 12/10/25 at 9:47 AM, during an interview, R #36's family member (FM) stated the following: 1. He gave Human Resources (HR) money to put in an account for R #36 shortly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of resident funds (the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's money without the resident's consent) 1 (R #36) of 2 (R #2 and R #36) residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident funds when staff failed to have evidence of a thorough investigation of misappropriation of resident funds. If the facility does not adequately investigate allegations of misappropriation of resident funds, then corrective action is not implemented to protect other residents from misappropriation of resident funds, then residents may suffer increased anxiety and fear that their money is not being protected. The findings are: A. Record review of R #36's admission documents, no date, revealed R #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 12/10/25 at 9:47 AM, during an interview, R #36's family member (FM) stated the following: 1. He gave Human Resources…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) was accurate for 1 (R #36) of 8 (R #4, R #5, R #6, R #7, R #10, R #17, R #36, and R #60) residents reviewed for dental care. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not having an accurate assessment of the residents' needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #36's admission documents, no date, revealed R #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 12/10/25 at 9:59 AM, during an interview, R #36's family member (FM) stated that R #36 had top dentures when she came to the facility and was missing her bottom dentures prior to admission. C. On 12/12/25 at 9:43 AM, during an observation and interview of R #36, the following was revealed: 1. R #36 stated she did not have any teeth or dentures. 2. R #36 stated she had dentures, but she was not sure what happened to them. 3. R #36 was observed to not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice (established guidelines and expectations that ensure the delivery of high-quality care to residents) for 2 (R #5 and R #17) of 7 (R #5, R #6, R #7, R #17, R #36, R #69 and R #76) residents reviewed for neglect when staff failed to follow physician orders. If the facility is not providing care per physician's orders, and providing care that meets professional standards of practice, then residents are likely to experience adverse effects, worsening of their condition, and potential complications from not receiving the care ordered by the physician. The findings are: R #5 A. Record review of R #5's admission record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #5's diagnoses include the following: a. Diastolic (congestive) heart failure (heart's main pumping chamber (left ventricle) becomes stiff and can't relax properly to fill with enough blood between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment for urinary conditions (conditions affect the kidneys, bladder, and tubes connecting them, ranging from common issues like Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs), incontinence, and kidney stones to more complex problems like overactive bladder, interstitial cystitis, and prostate issues (in men) for 1 (R #2) of 4 (R #2, R #5, R #6, and R #76) resident's reviewed for urinary conditions, when staff failed to provide services for Foley Catheter tubing (soft plastic or rubber tube that is inserted to the bladder to drain the urine and is connected to a collecting bag) care for R #2.This deficient practice could result in residents being susceptible to worsening of infection or becoming septic (potentially life-threatening when the body responds to infection by damaging its own tissues) The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's admission documents, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #2 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice services met professional standards for 2 (R #8 and R 69) of 2 (R #8 and R #69) residents reviewed for hospice services when staff failed to: 1. Ensure resident medical records had relevant communication indicating the delivery of hospice services (services provided for a person experiencing an advanced, life-limiting illness) for R #8 and R #69. 2. Ensure there was a coordinated plan of care in R #8's medical record delineating services that hospice was responsible for and services the facility was responsible for. These deficient practices could likely lead to residents not receiving the services needed due to lack of collaboration and communication between the facility and hospice provider. The findings are: R #8 A. Record review of R #8's admission documents, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #8 had a diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain (an outdated term for age-related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the bed rail and bed were compatible for 1 (R #17) of 1 (R #17) resident reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice could likely result in serious injury if residents fall while attempting to transfer while using the bed rail. The findings are:A. On 12/10/25 at 1:37 PM, during an observation of R #17 in his bed, revealed that R #17's bed rail was loose. The bed rail moved side to side parallel to the length of the bed approximately 1 to 2 inches. The bed rail appeared to be an aftermarket attachment to the side of the bed. When R #17 reached for the bed rail to assist with getting up from lying down, the bed rail gave. B. Record review of R #17's medical record, no date, revealed that there was no documentation that the bed rail has been inspected for proper installation. C. On 12/10/25 at 4:26 PM, during an interview, the ADON confirmed that the bed rail was not sturdy. The ADON stated she did not know if the bed rail had been inspected for proper installation.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect 25 out of 25 residents on the secure unit and North Hall (residents were identified by the resident census report, dated 10/18/24, provided by the Administrator on 12/13/24) sampled for abuse and neglect, when a staff member: 1. Abandoned residents by frequently leaving the building to go to his car multiple times throughout the shift. 2. Wore air pods (wireless headphones for listening to music and answering phone calls) in both ears, which prevented him from hearing what was occurring on the unit. 3. Fell asleep on the unit couch during the dinner meal. 4. Used loud, foul, abusive language. These deficient practices could result in residents' needs not being met, staff not being unaware of urgent resident needs, and residents feeling unsafe in their home. The findings are. A. Record review of the Incident Report, dated 10/25/24, revealed the following: 1. An abuse and neglect type of incident occurred on 10/19/24 at 6:00 PM. 2. CNA #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report alleged allegations of abuse and neglect to the State Agency for 25 out of 25 residents on the secure unit and north hall (residents were identified by the resident census report, dated 10/18/24, provided by the Administrator on 12/13/24) sampled for abuse and neglect, when they failed to report allegations of abuse and neglect by CNA #1 on 10/18/24 within two hours after the incident. If the facility fails to report allegations of abuse and neglect timely, then corrective action may not be taken, and residents could likely suffer serious bodily injury or a decline in their psychological well-being. A. Record review of the Incident Report, dated 10/25/24, revealed the following: 1. An abuse and neglect type of incident occurred on 10/19/24 at 6:00 PM. 2. CNA #1 was asleep on the job. 3. CNA #1 smelled of alcohol. 4. CNA #1 became belligerent, was cussing at staff, and threatened to kill staff. 5. CNA #1 got into an RN's space and threatened to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) training to 1 (CNA #1) of 3 (CNA #1, CNA #2, and CNA #4) staff sampled for training. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not knowing who, what, and when to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The findings are: A. Record review of CNA #1's training transcript, hire date 10/18/24, revealed CNA #1 did not take ANE training prior to working with residents on 10/18/24. B. On 12/11/24 at 1:58 PM, during an interview with the Scheduler, she revealed the following: 1. CNA #1 was staff member for an outside agency. 2. Agency staff do not complete facility trainings prior to working with residents at the facility. C. On 12/12/24 at 11:28 AM, during an interview with the DON, she stated the following: 1. Agency staff were required to have dementia training completed through the outside agency prior to working a shift at the facility. 2. Agency staff were not required to complete abuse, neglect, and exploitation training with the outside agency or the facility prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food and spices in accordance with professional standards of food service safety for all 43 residents (residents were identified on the resident census provided by the Administrator on 08/26/24) who ate food prepared in the kitchen when they failed to: 1. Label open food in the refrigerator. 2. Properly seal open food in the refrigerator. 3. Ensure spices were labeled with open dates. 4. Remove expired seasoning. These deficient practices could likely lead to foodborne illnesses. The findings are: A. On 08/26/24 at 11:54 AM, during an observation of the kitchen, a bag of chicken nuggets was opened and did not have an open date. The bag of chicken nuggets was not properly sealed. The bag appeared to have been rolled closed, and it unrolled and was open. B. On 08/26/24 at 11:55 AM, during an interview, the Lead [NAME] confirmed the bag of chicken nuggets was open and not sealed properly. The Lead [NAME] also confirmed the bag of chicken nuggets did not have an open date. The lead [NAME] confirmed staff should seal and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when they failed to have a water management program to minimize the risk of Legionella [a bacteria that can grow in parts of building water systems that are continually wet (e.g., pipes, faucets, water storage tanks, decorative fountains) and cause a serious type of pneumonia] and other opportunistic pathogens (bacteria that do not usually cause diseases in healthy people but may become extremely injurious to unhealthy individuals) in the building's water system. This failure could potentially affect all 43 residents who lived in the facility (residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the DON on 08/26/24). If the facility fails to maintain an effective infection control program, then infections could spread to residents throughout the facility, resulting in illness. The findings are: A. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services (the direct, responsible provision of medication-related care) were met for 1 (R #10) of 4 (R #10, R #22, R #29, and R #36) residents reviewed for medications when they failed to provide routine medication for a resident. This deficient practice could likely lead to unresolved medical issues. The findings are: A. Record review of R #10's Physician orders revealed an order dated 06/27/24 for turmeric tablet (common spice often taken as a supplement which might reduce swelling). Give 1500 mg (strength of tablet) by mouth one time a day for supplement. B. Record review of R #10's MAR for August 2024 revealed staff documented the drug was not available from 08/14/24 through 08/28/24. C. On 08/29/24 at 11:16 AM, during an interview, CMA #1 stated the turmeric was not available, because R #10's family did not bring the turmeric to the facility. D. Record review of R #10's progress notes, no date, revealed staff did not document any communication with the pharmacy or with R #10's family regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 2 (R #13 and R #25) of 7 (R #10, R #12, R #13, R #23, R #25, R #29 and R #32) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: R #13 A. Record review of R #13's admission Record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #13 diagnoses: a. Fibromyalgia [disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal (involving both muscle and bones) pain accompanied by fatigue, sleep, memory and mood issues.] b. Cramp (sudden, unexpected tightening of one or more muscles that can be very painful) and spasm (sudden, twitching contractions that are not usually painful.) c. Unspecified osteoarthritis (inflammation of one or more joints that occur without a known cause resulting in pain, stiffness, and loss of mobility.) d. Pain unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan revision occurred for 1 (R #30) of 4 (R #5, R #7, R #11, and R #30) residents reviewed for care plans, when they failed to update R #30's care plan to document that her lower dentures were lost. This deficient practice could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: A. On 08/26/24 at 2:30 PM, during an interview, R #30's said she lost her bottom dentures. R #30 said she did not remember when she lost them. B. Record review of R #30's progress notes, dated 06/12/24, revealed R #30 wore full dentures. C. Record review of R #30's care plan, dated 06/21/24, did not document R #30's bottom dentures were missing. D. On 08/27/24 at 10:59 AM, during an interview, the Business Office Manager (BOM) confirmed R #30's bottom dentures are lost. The BOM said she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for 1 (R #36) of 4 (R #10, R #22, R #29, and R #36) residents reviewed for medication administration, when staff did not administer R #36's blood pressure medication regardless of specific parameters (numerical or another measurable factor) from the medical provider. This deficient practice could likely lead to the resident having adverse (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result) side effects or not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of the medication due to it not being administered. The findings are: A. Record review of R #36's Physician orders revealed: 1. Order date 08/29/23: amlodipine besylate (medication used to treat high blood pressure) tablet. Give 5 mg by mouth one time a day. Hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP; top number of blood pressure reading) less than 100. 2. Order date 08/30/23: lisinopril (medication used to treat high blood pressure) tablet. Give 10 mg by mouth one time a day. Hold for SBP less than 100. B. Record review of R #36's MAR for July 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) was maintained or improved for 1 (R #12) of 2 (R #12 and R #25) residents reviewed for functional ability (the actual or potential capacity of an individual activity and tasks that can be normally expected). If the facility does not ensure that residents maintain or improve their functional abilities, then the residents are likely to experience a decrease in their ability to walk, transfer, and do other activities of daily living. The findings are: A. Record review of R #12's admission record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #12 was admitted on [DATE]. 2. R #12 had the following diagnoses: a. Unspecified dementia (term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities.) b. Other displaced fracture of upper extremity. c. Polyosteoarthrities (any type of arthritis that involves five or more joints simultaneously.) d. History of falling. e.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received restorative rehabilitation (focuses on maximizing an optimal level of functioning, enabling clients to regain/retain their independence following the debilitating effects of illness or injury) services as ordered by the physician for 2 (R #9 and #37) of 2 (R #9 and #37) residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. This deficient practice is likely to result in a decrease in residents functional mobility. The findings are: R #9 A. On 08/26/24 at 1:54 PM, during an interview with R #9, he stated he did not have any therapy services, but the nurses helped him move his arms and legs. B. Record review of R #9's physical (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed R #9 to discharge to same the skilled nursing facility (SNF) with right upper extremity (region of the body that includes the arm, forearm, wrist and hand) range of motion program [ROM; the movement potential of a joint from full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications, stimulants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers) unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific psychiatric diagnosis for 1 (R #25) of 5 (R #5, R #11, R #12, R #13, and R #25) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications without a medical reason and being at a higher risk of adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result). The findings are: A. Record review of R #25's admission Record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #25 diagnoses as follows: a. Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions.) b. Unspecified dementia (term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities.) c. Neurocognitive disorder with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to store medications properly for all 17 residents in the East Unit (residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 08/26/24), when they failed to ensure the medication cart did not contain loose medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents obtaining or being administered medication not prescribed to them, receiving medications that are less effective, and may result in adverse side effects. The findings are: A. On 08/28/24 at 12:05 PM, during an observation of the medication cart assigned to the East Unit with rooms 101-114, one white round tablet was loose in the second drawer of the medication cart and located towards the back of the medication cards (cardboard and foil packaging prefilled with prescription medication.) B. On 08/28/24 at 12:06 PM, during an interview, CMA #24 confirmed white round tablet was loose and not in bubble pack or pill container.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #2) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for hospitalizations, when they failed to continue the administration of antibiotics for treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI; infection of the urinary system). This deficient practice could likely lead to residents needs not being met and/or a worsening of their medical condition. The findings are: A. Review of R #2's medical record revealed: 1. R #2 was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 08/19/23 due to low blood pressure, elevated temperature, and urinary urgency (an immediate unstoppable urge to urinate). 2. R #2 returned to the facility after being seen in the ER, was diagnosed with UTI, and started on antibiotics. 3. R #2 was sent to the ER again on 08/22/23 due to lethargy (decrease in consciousness, drowsiness, or sleepiness) and abnormal vital signs. 4. R #2 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-14 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive mail on Saturday's for all 35 residents identified on the census provided on 07/10/23 by the Administrator. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving timely communication which could result in feelings of isolation. The findings are: A. On 07/12/23 at 10:38 am, during an interview with Resident Council members: R #2, R #3, R #6, R #7, R #13, R #31, R #32, and R #34, revealed that the resident's mail is not delivered on Saturday's because it goes to a Post Office box and there is no one to pick it up on the weekend and deliver it to the residents. B. On 07/03/23 at 11:03 AM, during an interview, the Receptionist revealed that the mail is not delivered on Saturday's because the Activity's Assistant has been out and there is no one to pick it up at the post office on the weekends and deliver it. C. Record review of Resident Council minutes dated 04/18/23, 05/16/23, and 06/30/23 revealed that no information related to Resident Council members regarding residents' mail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses (RN's and LPN's) and CNA's are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. This could affect all 35 residents in the facility (residents were identified by Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 07/10/23). This deficient practice could likely result in Nurses and CNA's working with residents without adequate competencies to do; likely resulting in injury or inappropriate care being provided to the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the personnel files revealed no competencies (the measurement of an individual's knowledge and skills as related to safe, competent performance) evaluations for the following staff: RN #11, RN #12, CNA #12, CNA #13, and CNA #14. B. On 07/14/23 at 10:45 AM, during an interview, the Administrator confirmed that there were no competencies on file for RN #11, RN #12, CNA #12, CNA #13, and CNA #14. C. On 07/14/23 at 11:09 AM, during an interview with the DON, she stated that they did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. This could affect all 35 residents in the facility who eat food prepared in the kitchen (residents were identified Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 07/10/23), when they failed to ensure food items in the kitchen labeled and dated. If the facility fails to adhere to safe food handling practices, hygiene practices, and safe food storage, residents are likely to be exposed to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). The findings are: A. On 07/10/23 at 1:10 PM, during an observation of the kitchen revealed the following: 1. Quaker Oats with no open date or expiration date 2. Completes Instant Mashed potatoes with no open date or expiration date B. On 07/10/23 at 1:20 PM, during interview, the [NAME] confirmed that there was not an open date or expiration date on the Quaker Oats or Completes Instant Mashed Potatoes. C. On 07/12/23 at 11:30 AM, during an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from physical restraints for 2 (R #27 and R #33) of 3 (R #25, R #27, and R #33) residents randomly sampled, when staff used the bed rails on R #27 and R #33's bed. This deficient practice could likely result in physical restraints being used for discipline or staff convenience; unnecessarily preventing residents from freedom, movement, or activity. The findings are: R #27: A. On 07/11/23 at 8:34 am during an observation and interview with R #27, it was observed resident was laying down on his bed and his bed had rails that were up. R #27 said that the bed rails have always been on his bed. B. Record review of R #27's physician orders revealed no orders for bed rails. C. Record review of R #27's assessments revealed no bed rail assessment was done. R #33: D. On 07/11/23 at 9:30 am, during an observation, R #33's bed had bed rails. E. Record review of R #33's physician orders revealed no orders for bed rails. F. Record review of R #33's assessments revealed no bed rail assessment was done.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (R #12) of 5 (R #12, R #25, R #27, R #29 and R #35) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications when they failed to: 1. Have parameters (numerical values) in place to determine when to administer or when to hold (not provide) blood pressure medication 2. Consistently measure blood pressure to determine effectiveness of medication or changes in blood pressure due to missed doses of medication 3. Report to physician when missed medication several days in a row These deficient practices could likely lead to the resident having adverse (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result) side effects or not receiving the therapeutic (desired) effect of the medication due to it not being administered. The findings are: A. Record review of R #12's Physician's orders revealed: Order Date 12/07/22 Atenolol (medication used to help lower blood pressure) Tablet 50 MG (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day (8 PM) for hypertension (high blood pressure)(no parameters included in order) B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #29) of 2 (R #12 and R #29) residents are receiving restorative therapy (a therapy in which a patient trains on abilities they already have to perfect them). If the facility does not ensure that residents receive restorative services, then the residents are likely to experience a decrease in their ability to walk, sit, stand, and perform other ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). The findings are: A. Record review of R #29's face sheet revealed an admission date 07/14/21. B. On 07/12/23 at 9:08 am during an interview with R #29, she revealed that she is not getting restorative interventions. C. Record review of R #29's Care Plan dated 06/28/23 revealed: 1. [name of resident] has a need for restorative intervention to increase ADL and mobility functions. 2. Resident will improve current level of function in ADL's and Mobility with restorative. 3. RESTORATIVE; Assistance ADL's, Lay out clothes for each day. D. On 07/13/23 during an interview with the DON, she confirmed that the facility does not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program for 9 (R #9, R #14, R #16, R #22, R #23, R #24, R #25, R #33 and R #191) of 9 (R #9, R #14, R #16, R #22, R #23, R #24, R #25, R #33 and R #191) residents reviewed for activities in the secured memory care unit. This deficient practice could likely cause boredom, isolation, anxiousness, and feeling helpless. The findings are: A. On 07/11/23 at 9:00 am, during an observation of the secured unit, the television was on, but the picture was fuzzy, not clear, and the volume was turned down and so low that the residents couldn't hear it R#23 and R #24 were sitting in front of it. No other activities were going on. B. On 07/11/23 at 11:28 am, during an observation of the secured unit, the television was on, the picture was fuzzy and the volume was not audible. R #23 was sitting in front of it. No other activities were going on. C. On 07/11/23 at 11:29, during an interview, CNA #13 confirmed that the television picture was fuzzy and that it had been that way for weeks. CNA #13 also said that staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care (breathing support) consistent with professional standards for 1 (R #12) of 2 (R #12 and R #13) residents reviewed for respiratory care when the facility failed to monitor R #12's oxygen levels. If the facility fails to monitor the resident's oxygen levels, they may fail to provide the resident with supplemental oxygen (additional oxygen to maintain oxygen levels above 90%) as needed. The finding are: A. On 07/11/23 at 2:37 pm, during an observation and interview, R #12 was sitting in her wheelchair, resident did not have her oxygen on and stated, I always use oxygen, the girls (CNA's) always put it on me, but I forgot to remind them. B. Record review of R #12's Physician's orders revealed: Order date 12/07/22 Oxygen via nasal cannula (tubing) 2 liters per minute as needed for Dyspnea (shortness of breath) Hypoxia (low oxygen levels) or Acute Angina (chest discomfort or shortness of breath caused when heart muscles receive insufficient oxygen-rich blood). C. Record review of R #12's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Dementia (group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function, caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells) Care training, to 1 (LPN #11) of 3 (LPN #11, RN #11, and RN #12) staff sampled for training. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the services necessary to attain or maintain their physical, mental, and psychosocial (involving both psychological and social aspects) well-being. The findings are: A. Record Review of annual staff trainings revealed no training completed for Dementia Care for LPN #11. B. On 07/14/23 at 10:45 AM, during an interview, the Administrator confirmed that there was no Dementia Care training for LPN #11.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Behavioral Health (the emotions and behaviors that affect your overall well-being) training, to 2 (LPN #11 and RN #12) of 3 (LPN #11, RN #11, and RN #12) staff sampled for training. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the services necessary to attain or maintain their physical, mental, and psychosocial (involving both psychological and social aspects) well-being. The findings are: A. Record Review of annual staff trainings revealed no training completed for Behavioral Health for LPN #11 and RN #12. B. On 07/14/23 at 10:45 AM, during an interview, the Administrator confirmed that there was no Behavioral Health training for LPN #11 and RN #12.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (R #13) of 4 (R #7, R #13, R #19, and R #33) residents reviewed for dental care. Failure to implement a resident-centered care plan may result in staff's failure to understand and implement the needs of residents, likely resulting in residents not receiving the care and/or treatment needed. The findings are: A. On 07/11/23 at 2:08 pm during an interview, R #13 revealed that she needs a dental appointment to address her missing teeth. B. On 07/11/23 at 2:08 pm during observation of R #13 revealed several missing teeth. C. Record review of R #13's Care Plan revised date 03/03/23 revealed: 1. The resident has oral/dental health problems. She is missing some teeth. 2. Resident will be free of infection, pain or bleeding in the oral cavity by/through review. D. On 07/12/23 at 02:14 PM during an interview, the Social Worker revealed that she had not set up an appointment for R #13 because she was not aware of any issues.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
1203 NM HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2024
STEIN, CHARLESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2024
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2024
1203 HWY 60 W NM LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
1203 NM REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
BYZANTINE NM TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
TALIA NM TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
MINDLE, ADAMIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
COBALT NM TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
PERIWINKLE NM TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
CASH, PATRICKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/17/2024
METZLER, ERICIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/17/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$626K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 3%Other / private 10%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $626K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$383per resident / day
operating cost
$11,647per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325073. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next