No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Paloma Springs Healthcare LLC

1400 North Silver Street, T Or C, NM 87901 · For profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (575) 894-7855 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (575) 894-7855 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0602, F0603) — most recent Jan 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$19,971 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0602, F0603) — most recent Jan 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $19,971 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
201 E 4th Ave · (575) 894-2716 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
500 N Broadway St · (575) 894-3055 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Bullocks1.1 mi
630 N Broadway St · (575) 894-6622 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Cedar St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.3%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.9%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.9%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%2.0%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%11.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.6%14.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.3%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.8%14.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%86.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.1%22.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.9%15.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.731.651.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.602.811.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.0%CMS range 31.1–54.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.0%CMS range 9.2–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.1–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
30.0%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 88.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-28)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment for pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of care (reasonable degree of care a person should provide to another person, typically in a professional or medical setting) for 1 (R #242) of 2 (R #192 and R #242) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, when staff failed to: 1. Monitor wound progression. 2. Notify the provider about changes in wound condition. 3. Administer prescribed antibiotics in a timely manner. This deficient practice likely resulted in unnecessary worsening of R #242's wound, pain, and suffering. The findings are: A. Record review of R #242's medical record revealed the following: 1. R #242 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #242 discharged to another facility on 10/25/23. 3. R #242 had a diagnosis of the following: a. Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) following cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #18) of 3 (R #16, R #17, and R #18) residents reviewed for behavioral health treatment when staff failed to:Document R #18's behaviors.Document side effects (any unintended effect of a medication) from R #18's anti- anxiety medication (used to treat anxiety symptoms). These deficient practices could likely cause staff to not have the most accurate resident information and adversely impact the care staff provides. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Behavior Management Policy, revised January 2026, revealed the following: 1. When a resident exhibits adverse behavioral symptom (e.g., crying, yelling, hitting, biting, etc.), licensed nursing staff will document the behaviors in the medical record, noting the time the behavior(s) occur, antecedent events, possible causal factors and interventions attempted. 2. Nursing staff will document the resident's response to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency (SA) for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2 and R #3) residents sampled for neglect. If the facility fails to report allegations of possible neglect to the SA, then the SA is unable to ensure residents are free from neglect and have a safe home environment. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's incident report for R #1 dated 09/28/25 at 6:30 AM revealed the following: 1. Incident documented as other. 2. Nursing description of incident: R #1 was found in bed with blood on her face, her bed, the floor and in the trashcan. 3. Resident description of incident: R #1 stated she was not sure what happened. When asked if she fell resident stated I'm not sure, I don't remember what happened. I don't know if I fell. 4. Immediate action taken by staff: R #1 was assessed by nursing staff, provider was notified of the incident and R #1 was sent to the emergency room for further evaluation. B. On 12/04/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change (major decline or improvement in the patient's health status) MDS Set assessment within 14 days after the facility determined a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for MDS. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents not receiving the appropriate care and services they need. The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/06/25 admit to hospice care (special kind of care that focuses on a person's quality of life and dignity near the end of life) effective 11/06/25. B. Record review of R #1's significant change of condition MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed the MDS assessment was not signed off by the RN until 12/01/25. C. On 12/05/25 at 12:40 PM, during an interview with the MDS coordinator, she confirmed that the significant change MDS assessment for R #1 was not signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an MDS assessment was completed every three months for 1 (R #8) of 4 (R #8, R #9, R #10, and R #11) residents reviewed for MDS assessments, when they failed to complete quarterly MDS assessments timely (completed 14 days after the assessment reference date (ARD)). This deficient practice could result in resident's assessments being outdated and residents not receiving care and treatment that meets their current needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #8's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the following: 1. ARD date of 11/14/25. 2. Not signed by the RN for completion. B. On 12/05/25 at 9:49 AM, during an interview, the MDS Coordinator (MSC) confirmed that R #8's MDS assessment was not completed on time.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2 and R #3) residents reviewed for documentation accuracy. This deficient practice has the potential to have a negative impact on the care staff provide to residents due to missing or inaccurate records and resident information. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #1 had the following diagnoses: a. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that cause airflow obstruction and breathing problems) with acute exacerbation (a sudden worsening of symptoms in a chronic condition). b. Respiratory failure unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia (condition where you do not have enough oxygen in the tissues in your body [hypoxia] or when you have too much carbon dioxide in your blood [hypercapnia]. B. Record review of R #1's care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions for all 81 residents who eat food from the kitchen (residents were identified by the resident census provided by the Administrator on 04/21/25), when they failed to label and date dessert items in the kitchen refrigerator. If the facility fails to store food under safe and sanitary conditions then this could likely lead to foodborne illnesses (Foodborne illness can occur if you eat foods that are contaminated with harmful pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi) in residents. The findings are: A. On 04/21/25 at 10:24 AM, during an observation of the kitchen, revealed the walk-in refrigerator had 1 tray with 12 desserts on tray with eight (8) out of 12 desserts did not have a date to indicate when they were prepared. B. On 04/21/25 at 10:24 AM, during an interview with the Dietary Director, she confirmed eight (8) out of 12 desserts on the 1 tray in the refrigerator did not have dates on lids. The Dietary Director stated, having a few with a date on the lids on the same tray should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed in advance of what medications they received and understood the reasons, risks, and benefits of the medications for 1 (R #62) of 5 (R #9, R #45, R #46, R #62 and R #90) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If the residents or their representatives are not informed of the risks and benefits of the medication or treatment alternatives, they are not able to make informed decisions regarding residents' care. The findings are: A. Record review of R #62's physician's orders revealed the following: 1. An order for fluvoxamine oral tablet (psychotropic medication; any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), 50 milligrams (mg) Give one tablet by mouth two times daily for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback, and avoidance of similar situations). Start date:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the provider of missed medication doses for 1 (R #90) of 1 (R #90) resident reviewed for diarrhea, when they failed to notify the provider that R #90 missed 8 doses of Questran (medication that can provide relief of diarrhea caused by surgery or disease of the small bowel) and 12 doses of fiber (can be used to relieve mild-to-moderate diarrhea. Soluble fiber soaks up water in the digestive tract, which makes stool firmer and slower to pass) medication. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving necessary care or worsening medical condition due to lack of treatment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #90's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #90 had the following diagnoses: a. Diarrhea (loose, watery stools that occur more frequently than usual). b. Noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis (involve inflammation of your stomach and intestines). c.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 02/12/2024 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revisions and care plan meeting requirements occurred for 7 (R #1, R #9, R #15, R #37, R #45, R #89 and R #90) of 8 (R #1, R #9, R #15, R #37, R #45, R #62, R #89 and R #90) residents when the staff failed to: 1. Have the required Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, team members from different disciplines working collaboratively, with a common purpose, to set goals, make decisions and share resources and responsibilities) members participate in the care plan meeting for R #9, R #15, R #45, R #89, and R #90. 2. Ensure the care plan meeting was held within 7 days from the completion of the MDS assessment when creating the care plan for R #1, R #9, and R #45. 3. Revise the care plan with the most current resident information for R #1, R #45, and R #90. These deficient practices could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (R #90) of 1 (R #90) resident when staff failed to administer medications according to physician's orders. If the facility is not providing care that meets professional standards of quality, then residents are likely to experience adverse effects, worsening of their condition, and potential complications from not receiving the care ordered by the physician. The findings are: A. Record review of R #90's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R # 90 had the following diagnoses: a. Diarrhea (loose, watery stools that occur more frequently than usual). b. Noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis (involve inflammation of your stomach and intestines). c. Cellulitis of abdominal wall (a rare sign of acute appendicitis that presents as aggressive intra-abdominal inflammation). d. Acquired absence of other parts of digestive tract (missing parts of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 02/12/24 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's recommendations were reviewed and implemented by the physician and/or the physician provided documentation of a rationale (a set of reasons or a logical basis for a course of action or a particular belief) for not following the consultant pharmacist's recommendation in the residents' medical record for 2 (R #45 and R #46) of 5 (R #9, R #45, R #46, R #62, and R #90) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications that are no longer necessary and may cause unnecessary drug interactions (changes to medication action caused by being combined with other foods, beverages, or drugs) or adverse side effects (unwanted, undesirable effects from medication). The findings are: R #45 A. Record review of R #45's face sheet no date revealed the following: 1. R #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], 2. R # 45 was diagnosed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep residents free from psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for 2 (R #45 and R #46) of 5 (R #9, R #45, R #46, R #62 and R #90) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications when they failed to: 1. Carry out a gradual dose reduction (GDR; stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the medication can be discontinued) and failed to document clinical rationale to continue psychotropic medications for R #45 and R #46. 2. Ensure that as needed (PRN) psychotropic orders were limited to 14 days and ensure that if the prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order for R #46. If consultant pharmacist recommendations and physician's orders are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #45, and R #78) residents sampled for environment, when staff failed to do the following: 1. Keep the residents' floor free of trash and orange peels. 2. Remove the residents' lunch tray after they had finished. 3. Empty and remove full urinal from the tray table. These deficient practices could likely cause residents to feel like they are not living in a comfortable home-like environment and like they are not valued. The findings are: A. On 04/21/25 at 2:15 PM, during an observation of R #1's room, revealed there were orange peels on the R #1's floor. There were food crumbs on the floor around R #1's bed. R #1's floor also had paper trash on the floor. On R #1's tray table, there was a lunch tray from lunch service (lunch was served at 12:00 pm). There was a full urinal on R #1's lunch tray. B. On 04/21/25 at 2:21 PM, during an interview, CNA #8 confirmed that there were orange peels, trash, and spills on the floor. CNA #8 confirmed that R #1's lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 02/12/24 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents, or their representatives received a written notice of the bed hold policy which indicated the duration the bed would be held for 2 (R #32 and R #90) of 2 (R #32 and R #90) residents reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents and/or their representative being unaware of the bed hold policy upon return from the hospital. The findings are: R #32 A. Record review of R #32's transfer notification, dated 04/16/25, revealed R #32 was sent to the hospital for cough and congestion. B. Record review of R #32's medical record, no date, revealed staff did not complete a written bed hold notification for R #90's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. R #90 C. On 04/21/25 at 3:33 PM, during an interview, R #90 stated the following: 1. R #90 was sent to the hospital on [DATE], because the staff thought he was having heart issues. 2. Staff did not provide him with a written bed hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) were accurate for 2 (R #9 and R #46) of 5 (R #9, R #29, R #46, R #62 and R #78) residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not having an accurate assessment of the residents' needs. The findings are: R #9 A. On 04/22/25 at 09:20 AM, during an interview, R #9 stated she did not have any teeth and needed dentures. B. Record review of R #9's admission record revealed R #9 was admitted on [DATE]. C. Record review of R #9's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed: 1. Section L0200, Dental, check all that apply a. Staff did not check that R #9 had no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous; the state of being without teeth). D On 04/25/25 at 11:03 AM, during an interview, the MDS Coordinator stated that she was unaware that R #9 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 02/12/24. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 (R #90) of 2 (R #32 and R #90) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #90's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Diagnosis of Edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues). B. Record review of R #90's physician order dated 03/11/25, revealed an order for Furosemide (diuretic medication used to treat fluid retention (edema) and swelling caused by congestive heart failure, liver disease, kidney disease, and other medical conditions) 40 mg, once a day for edema. C. Record review of R #90's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 03/17/25, revealed Section N- Medications: N0415 High-Risk Drug Classes; Staff selected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Recite from 02/12/24. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #90) of 1 (R #90) residents reviewed for documentation accuracy. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to missing or inaccurate records and resident information. The findings are: A. Record review of R #90's admission record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R # 90 had the following diagnoses: a. Diarrhea (loose, watery stools that occur more frequently than usual). b. Noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis (involves inflammation of your stomach and intestines). c. Cellulitis of abdominal wall (a rare sign of acute appendicitis that presents as aggressive intra-abdominal inflammation). d. Acquired absence of other parts of digestive tract (missing parts of your digestive organs due to an injury or operation). B. Record review of R #90's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Past noncompliance Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident exploitation when Activity Aide (AA) #1 used R #16's bank debit card to make an unauthorized (without the account holders permission) money withdrawals or purchases for 1 (R #16) of 3 (R #16, R #17, and R #18) residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not having money available when they need it, psychosocial distress, and a loss of trust in staff. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's self report, dated 09/13/24, revealed the following: 1. The self-report was submitted to the State Agency due to allegations of misappropriation (wrongful use of another's belongings, money, etc.) of funds for R #16. 2. R #16's Power of Attorney (POA, the authority to act for another person in specified or all legal or financial matters) reported that R #16's bank account was missing nearly $3,000 and there were multiple suspicious (showing a cautious distrust) charges. 3. The police were called and started an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #1) of 2 (R #1 and #2) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet no date, revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a fall risk evaluation (an evaluation to determine a residents risk of falls), dated 04/26/24, indicated R #1 was a high fall risk. C. Record review of R #1's baseline care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff acted upon pharmacy recommendations for all 85 residents in the facility (residents were identified on the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 02/05/24), when they failed to get the pharmacy recommendations back from the provider with instructions to accept or decline recommendations, within 30 days of the facility receiving the pharmacy recommendations. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being at a higher risk of adverse (undesired harmful effect resulting from medication) side effects. The findings are: A. Record review of the Pharmacy Recommendations, for November 2023, revealed the following: 1. The pharmacist conducted a facility wide Medication Regimen Review on 11/11/23. 2. The provider signed off on the recommendations from the pharmacist Medication Regimen Review on 12/15/23. B. Record review of the Pharmacy Recommendations, for December 2023, revealed the following: 1. The pharmacist conducted a facility wide Medication Regimen Review on 12/19/23. 2. The provider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow procedures in accordance with professional standards of food service safety, when they failed to: 1. Ensure the chemical sanitation solution was maintained at the correct concentration. 2. Properly label opened food items in the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer. This failure had the potential to affect all 81 residents in the facility who eat food prepared in the kitchen. Residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 02/05/24. If the facility fails to adhere safe food storage then residents are likely to be exposed to foodborne illnesses. The findings are: Sanitizer Solution A. On 02/05/24 at 10:05 AM, during an observation, the kitchen revealed the following: 1. The chemical sanitation solution, used during the rinse cycle of dishwashing, leaked from the container onto the counter. 2. The Dietary Director (DD) ran a sanitizer strip test, during the rinse cycle of dishwashing, but the sanitizer solution did not register on the test strip. B. On 02/05/24 at 10:05 AM, during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for all 19 residents in the secured unit (residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 02/05/24), when the facility failed to refer to residents in a dignified manner. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling embarrassed, angry, and that their feelings are unimportant to the facility staff. The findings are: A. On 02/05/24, at 12:11 PM, during an interview with LPN #11, she said the CNAs assist residents that need assistance with eating. LPN #11 said the secured unit had a lot of feeders. LPN #11 said they were supposed to refer to the residents as feed assists. B. On 02/12/24, at 11:38 AM, during an interview, the DON stated staff were not supposed to refer to residents as feeders. The DON said referring to residents as feeders was a dignity issue and was not acceptable. The DON said staff were corrected right away and educated if they refer to residents as feeders.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievance (complaints over something believed to be wrong or unfair) were acted upon for 2 (R #1 and R #28) of 2 (R #1 and R #28) residents reviewed for grievances. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling unimportant and unsatisfied with the results of the grievance process. The findings are: R #1 A. On 02/05/24, at 1:01 PM, during an interview, R #1 stated a blue jacket with hot pink on it went missing on 02/03/24. R #1 said she told the laundry girl the jacket was missing. R #28 B. On 02/05/24, at 1:24 PM, during an interview, R #28 stated the following: 1. She had several pants that went missing roughly 7 months ago. 2. About two months ago one of her shirts got bleached in the laundry. She gave it to one of the laundry workers, but did not hear anything about it. 3. She was missing a pair of jeans and told laundry staff about them. C. On 02/08/24, at 2:27 PM, during an interview with Laundry Aide (LA) #1, she stated the following: 1. Any concerns about missing laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from involuntary seclusion for 5 (R #56, R #72, R #79, R #82, and R #193) of 5 (R #56, R #72, R #79, R #82, and R #193) residents sampled for elopement (an act or instance of leaving a safe area or safe premises, done by a person with a mental disorder or cognitive impairment) risk, when they failed to implement and document the following: 1. The clinical criteria (rules or standards on which a decision or judgment is made to determine medical necessity) met for placement in the secured/locked area by the resident's physician along with information provided by members of the interdisciplinary team (IDT team members from different disciplines working collaboratively, with a common purpose, to set goals, make decisions and share resources and responsibilities). 2. Whether placement in the secured/locked area was the least restrictive approach that was reasonable to protect the resident and assure his/her health and safety. 3. The IDT consideration of the impact and/or reaction of the resident, if any,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents, their representatives, and the Ombudsman received a written notice of transfer as soon as practicable for 3 (R #1, R #16, and R #28 ) of 3 (R #1, R #16, and R #28) residents reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative not knowing the reason or location the resident was discharged . The findings are: R #1 A. On 02/05/24, at 1:11 PM, during an interview, R #1 stated she went to the hospital about three weeks ago. B. Record review of R #1's transfer documents revealed the following: 1. The facility transferred R #1 to the hospital on [DATE]. 2. The transfer notice was an electronic form in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR), and the EMR did not contain evidence to show the resident received the transfer notice in writing. 3. Transfer notice did not have information regarding: a. How the resident or the resident representative can appeal the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specified the bed hold policy and the number of days the facility will hold a bed for the resident at the time of the transfer for 3 (R #1, R #16, and R #28) of 3 (R #1, R #16, and R #28) residents sampled for hospitalizations, when they failed to: 1) Use a written Bed Hold Notice that included the number of days the facility will hold a bed for the resident at the time of the transfer for R #1 and R #28. 2) Provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specified the bed hold policy and the number of days the facility will hold a bed for the resident at the time of the transfer for R #16. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative being unaware of the resident ability to return to their previous room or the next available room upon return from the hospital. The findings are: R #1 A. On 02/05/24, at 1:11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, which included the traditional care of the resident, the prevention and early detection of disease, and rehabilitation) assessment within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 (R #56) of 5 (R #56, R #72, R #79, R #82, and R #193) residents reviewed for completion of a comprehensive MDS assessment. This deficient practice could likely result in residents' preferences and needs not being met. The findings are: A. Record review of R #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/20/24. B. Record review of R #16's medical record revealed staff did not complete an admission MDS assessment as of 02/12/24. C. On 02/12/24, at 11:30 AM, during an interview, the MDS Coordinator confirmed R #56's admission MDS was not completed within 14 days of R #56's admission to the facility. The MDS Coordinator said that the admission MDS's should be completed within 14 days.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 6 (R #16, R #50, R #56, R #79, R #82, and R #193) of 6 (R #16, R #50, R #56, R #79, R #82, and R #193) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Failure to develop a person-centered care plan could likely result in staff's failure to understand the needs, preferences, and treatments for residents to achieve their highest level of well-being. The findings are: A. On 02/12/24 at 11:00 AM, during an interview with the DON, she confirmed resident care plans should be person centered and should include correct information about resident care so the nurses are aware of how to care for the residents. R #16 B. On 02/05/24 at 2:47 PM, during an observation of R #16's room, it was observed that that R #16 had a dialysis catheter to the left chest. C. On 02/06/24 at 2:22 PM, during an interview with R #16, he confirmed the following: 1. He received dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays through the dialysis catheter in his left chest. 2. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: A. On 02/05/24, at 1:09 PM, during an interview, R #1 stated she lost weight due to irritable bowel syndrome (an intestinal disorder causing pain in the belly, gas, diarrhea, and constipation). B. On 02/05/24, at 1:09 PM, during an observation, R #1 appeared very thin. C. Record review of weights log revealed the following: 1. On 07/04/23 - 101.2 lbs. 2. On 08/02/23 - 98.4 lbs. 3. On 09/05/23 - 92.8 lbs. 4. On 10/06/23 - 88.8 lbs. 5. On 11/06/23 - 90.4 lbs. 6. On 12/11/23 - 79.0 lbs. 7. On 12/25/23 - 82.4 lbs. 8. On 01/08/24 - 80.8 lbs. 9. On 01/08/24 - 80.8 lbs. 10. On 01/15/24 - 84.4 lbs. 11. On 01/22/24 - 82.6 lbs. 12. On 01/26/24 - 93.8 lbs. 13. On 01/29/24 - 81.4 lbs. 14. On 02/12/24 - 78.2 lbs. 15. On 02/15/24 - 81.8 lbs. E.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents sampled for nutrition, when they failed to: a. Update the care plan to reflect actual weight loss. b. Follow dietitian's recommendations. These deficient practices could likely result in residents losing weight without the facility being aware causing physical and mental health issues. The findings are: A. On 02/05/24, at 1:09 PM, during an interview and observation with R #1, she stated she lost weight due to irritable bowel syndrome (an intestinal disorder causing pain in the belly, gas, diarrhea, and constipation). R #1 appeared very thin. B. Record review of R #1's Medical Record revealed R #1's medical diagnoses: 1. Anorexia nervosa (an eating disorder that causes a severe and strong fear of gaining weight), onset date 0 9/03/21. 2. Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents obtained dental services for 2 (R #13 and R #16) of 3 (R #13, R #16, and R # 193) residents sampled for dental services, when they failed to: a. Ensure residents received routine dental care to include an annual inspection of the mouth for signs of disease, dental cleaning, fillings, or minor partial or full denture adjustments. b. Ensure residents received emergent dental services when indicated. These deficient practices are likely to cause the resident unnecessary pain, embarrassment over the condition/appearance of teeth, and potential dental or oral complications. The findings are: R #13 A. Record review of R #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/11/23. B. On 02/06/24, at 10:01 AM, during an interview with R #13, he said his front teeth were missing, and he would like to have them replaced. R #13 said he talked to staff and his guardian, but they did not make him an appointment. R #13 said he had not been to the dentist since he has been at the facility. C. B. On 02/07/24, at 1:16 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document in the resident record for 1 (R #60) of 5 (R #1, R #49, R #60, R #78, and R #82) residents sampled for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely cause staff to be unaware of residents' current conditions if they are not documenting accurately in the medical chart. The findings are: A. Record review of R #60's Physician's Orders revealed the following: 1) Soliqua (a fixed-dose combination medication that combines insulin glargine and lixisenatide and is used to treat diabetes.) pen-injector. (Insulin Glargine-Lixisenatide) Inject 15 units, in the morning related to Type 2 diabetes. Hold if blood sugar is less then 150. B. Record review of R #60's TAR, for January 2024, revealed staff documented they gave R #60 Soliqua on the following dates: 1) On 01/01/24 with a blood sugar reading of 139. 2) On 01/02/24 with a blood sugar reading 145. 3) On 01/07/24 with a blood sugar reading 142. 4) On 01/31/24 with a blood sugar reading 120. C. Record review of R #60's TAR, for February 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store medications properly for all 20 residents in rooms 219 through 230 (residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 02/05/24) randomly sampled residents, when they failed to dispose of one loose tablet in the medication cart on the 200 unit. This deficient practice could result in residents obtaining medication not prescribed to them resulting in adverse side effects. The findings are: A. On 02/08/24, at 12:55 PM, during an observation, the medication cart on 200 unit revealed one loose tablet in the medication cart. B. On 02/08/24, at 12:55 PM, during an interview, CMA #5 confirmed there was one loose tablet in the medication cart. C. On 02/12/24, at 12:14 PM, during an interview, the DON confirmed medications should not be loose in the medication cart.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical records contained documentation each resident received or staff offered the pneumococcal (a bacteria that caused pneumonia infection of the respiratory tract) vaccination for 1 (R #60) of 5 (R #09, R #10, R #28, R #60, and R #86) residents reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice could likely lead to residents contracting respiratory infections and could result in the spread of infection to other residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #60's medical record revealed the following: 1. Staff documented R #60 declined the pneumococcal vaccination, undated. 2. Influenza/Pneumococcal Vaccination consent form, dated 10/04/23, revealed R #60 gave consent for the pneumococcal vaccination. 3. The record did not contain any other consent forms. C. Record review of R #60's all staff Progress Notes, from admission through review, revealed the record did not contain documentation staff administered the pneumococcal vaccination, R #60 declined the pneumococcal vaccination, or that staff provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure residents participating in Resident Council knew where the most recent survey was located, 2. Update the binder with the most recent survey for residents/family's access. This could affect the 9 (R#7, R#8, R#16, R#33, R#36, R#47, R#57, R#59 and R #68) of 9 (R#7, R#8, R#16, R#33, R#36, R#47, R#57, R#59 and R #68 ) residents sampled in Resident Council. If residents are unable to locate the latest survey conducted by State Surveyors, then residents, representatives, and visitors are unable to know how the facility is doing and make decisions accordingly. The findings are: A. On 10/28/22 at 2:00 PM, during the resident council interview, R#7, R#8, R#16, R#33, R#36, R#47, R#57, R#59 and R #68 revealed: 1. Residents were not aware that they have access to the most recent Survey. 2. The residents did not know where the latest survey is located. B. On 10/28/22 at 10:15 am, during an observation of the front lobby revealed a displayed Survey binder. C. Record review of the Survey Binder revealed the last survey on display…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-02 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer as soon as practicable to residents and the ombudsman when residents were transferred to the hospital for emergency services for 3 (R #4, R #45, and R #56) of 5 (R #4, R #42, R #45, R#56 and R #66) residents. This deficient practice could likely result in residents or their representatives and the ombudsman being unaware of the reason for the transfer and the right to appeal. The findings are: R #4 A. Record review of R #4's Medical Record revealed the following: 1) R #4 went to the hospital on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #4 Transfer Notice dated 10/04/22 revealed R #4 did not sign until he returned to the facility on [DATE]. C. On 11/02/22 at 1:13 pm, during an interview the SSD (Social Service Director) confirmed that R #4 did not get a Transfer Notice until R #4 came back to the facility on [DATE]. R #45 D. Record review of R #45's Medical Record revealed the following: 1) R #45 went to the hospital on [DATE]. E.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pharmacist recommendations were reviewed by a physician and implemented after repeated monthly recommendations for 2 (R #56 and R #66) of 5 (R #4, R #23, R #32, R #52, R #56 and R #66) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications that are no longer necessary and may cause unnecessary drug interactions or adverse side effects. The findings are: R #56 A. Record review of Pharmacy Recommendation for R #56 dated 06/12/22 revealed: 1. The resident has an order for Fentanyl (powerful opioid drug used in the treatment of severe pain), Tramadol (opioid analgesic used to help relieve moderate to moderately severe pain), Codeine-Guaifenesin liquid (combination of an opioid cough suppressant and an expectorant cough syrup used to reduce cough and loosen mucus), and Acetaminophen-Codeine (opioid combination medication used to help relieve mild to moderate pain). Please add the standing order for PRN (as needed) Naloxone (Narcan; medicine that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation in the medical record for 1 (R #50) of 1 (R #50) resident when they failed to: 1) Document the plan for treatment from the NP (Nurse Practitioner) for R #50 after her labs came back with a recommendation to repeat sample and labs, 2) Document the cancellation of R #50's eye surgery appointment. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being unaware of their plan of care or upcoming appointments cause anxiety and depression. The findings are: Labs A. Record review of R #50's Physicians Orders revealed the following: 1) 09/28/2022 Culture, Urine. 2) 09/29/2022 Culture, Urine (a separate order). B. Record review of the lab results revealed the following: 1) The sample could have been contaminated and asks the facility to resubmit a new sample. 2) Handwritten at the bottom revealed NP notified on 10/03/22 at 16:48. (4:48 pm) C. Record review of R #50's Medical Record revealed the following: 1) No documentation of what the NP wanted to do about the lab request for a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with respect and dignity for 1 (R #52) of 1 (R #52) residents randomly sampled, when the facility did not have any pants or bottom covering for R #52 who's lower body was uncovered exposing her brief. This deficient practice could likely result in residents becoming depressed, anxious, and lacking self-worth. The findings are: A. On 10/26/22 at 10:52 AM, during observation of the Memory Care Unit, R #52 was observed laying in the bed closest to the door, the curtain and the door were open. R #52 had a shirt but was not covered with a blanket. R #52 did not have pants on and her brief was completely exposed. B. On 10/26/22 at 10:55 AM, during an interview CNA #21 confirmed the resident was not covered and she covered her. C. On 10/31/22 at 3:50 PM, during observation of R #52's room and interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), R #52 was observed uncovered and her brief was exposed. The MD confirmed that R #52 had a shirt on but was uncovered from the waist down exposing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the facility Bed-hold notice upon transfer for 1 (R #45) of 1 (R #45) residents sampled for bed hold. This deficient practice could likely cause resident frustration and anxiety about not knowing if the facility will hold their bed while away. The findings are: A. Record review of R #45's Medical Record revealed the following: 1) R #45 went to the hospital on [DATE]. 2) No documentation of a bed hold notice was found. B. On 11/01/22 at 5:05 PM, during an interview with the Business Office Manager (BOM) and the Administrator, the BOM stated that R #45 was not given a bed hold policy. The BOM and Administrator stated that the facility tried to contact R #45 family and R #45 but could not get a hold of them. The Administrator did confirm that there was documentation of the facilities attempts to contact R #45 or his family.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$19,971 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $19,971 — penalty dated 2024-02-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASA HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
CALIBER ADVISORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
HATTERAS INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
KAPLAN, MOSHAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
1400 N SILVER STREET NM, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
HALLMARK ADVISORS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
HANSEN HUNTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
OPCO NM SKILLED MGMT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
THE WRIGHT GROUP CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
WILSHIRE HEALTH REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
STOLARCZYK, LISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/07/2024
WILLIAMS, SCOTTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 4%Other / private 9%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$374per resident / day
operating cost
$11,370per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$372per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325062. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next