No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Taos Healthcare

1340 Maestas Road, Taos, NM 87571 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (575) 758-2300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (575) 758-2300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1331 Gusdorf Rd · (575) 758-3601 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
105 Paseo Del Canon W Ste P1 · (575) 425-0171 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
303 W Roy Rd · (575) 613-2123 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
551 Cruz Alta Rd · (575) 758-1692

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.0%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.9%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.0%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.3%11.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.9%14.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.4%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.3%14.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.5%86.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.6%22.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit25.0%15.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.731.651.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.182.811.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.0%CMS range 43.4–60.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.1–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.1–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 93.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.13 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that grievances were consistently tracked, resolved, and communicated back to residents. If the facility is not responding to resident concerns, then residents may feel unimportant and this may impact their mental health as well as their physical health if residents are not receiving the appropriate meals and receiving regular showers. The findings are: A. On 01/13/2026 at 1:39 pm during a resident council meeting, the following issues were discussed: - R #107 stated residents are not being notified of how or when a grievance they have filed has been resolved. She stated grievances get turned in and they are never followed up on. She stated some of the grievances that have been filed that are waiting to be resolved are:1. Communication with kitchen staff is an issue because all kitchen staff are Spanish speaking only and they are not following resident tickets. No one from dietary attends their resident council meetings even though they have invited the dietary manager. 2. Residents have not been getting to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment when staff failed to:- Ensure residents consistently had access to hot water.- Maintain the dining room in a homelike manner.- Maintain resident rooms and restrooms in good repair. These failures had the potential to affect all residents who utilize the dining room and all residents in eight sampled resident rooms. If the facility does not ensure resident rooms and common areas are clean, free from pests, and maintained in good repair, then residents are at risk of decreased quality of life, pest infestation, injury due to unsafe environmental conditions, and infections due to hot water not being available. The findings are:Water TemperaturesA. On 01/11/26 at 12:26 pm during an observation in the kitchen revealed the last date water temperatures were logged was 01/07/26.B. On 01/12/2026 at 1:14 pm during an interview R #60 resident stated he had been trying to get a shower done but there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards for 2 (R #'s 9 and 104) of 2 (R #'s 9 and 104) residents by: Allowing R #9 to use and store respiratory medical equipment without physician orders. Not following R #104's care plan to complete weekly skin assessments/checks. If the facility is not adhering to professional standards for quality improvement, the resident is not likely to get the highest quality of care. The findings are:R #9: A. Refer to F0880 for related findings. B. On 01/15/26 at 3:21 pm during an interview with the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), she stated R #9's family will bring in outside medical equipment that is not ordered. The RNC confirmed staff should be aware of what medical equipment R #9 possess and ensure there are physician orders for those devices. R #104: C. Record review of R #104's face sheet revealed R #104 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. D. Record review of R #104's care plan dated 08/25/25 revealed R #104 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) for 3 (CNAs #4, #6, and #7) of 5 (CNAs #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) CNAs randomly reviewed. If the facility is not completing a performance review of every CNA at least once every 12 months, then residents are likely to not receive the appropriate care and services, and the CNAs may not meet the needs of all residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility staffing list dated 01/12/26 revealed the following: CNA #4 was hired on 10/20/17 and was still working in the facility. CNA #6 was hired on 12/01/21 and was still working in the facility. CNA #7 was hired on 10/05/22 and was still working in the facility. B. Record review of the facility CNA annual performance reviews requested on 01/14/26 revealed CNAs #4, #6, and #7 did not have annual performance reviews completed and/or available for review. C. On 01/15/26 at 1:09 pm during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #3, he stated he recently was put in charge of facility CNA training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews; the facility failed to ensure medication error rate did not exceed five percent for 3 (R #16, R#26, and R #61) of 3 (R #16, R#26, and R #61) residents. The medication error rate was 11.54% from staff administering 26 medications with 3 errors. This deficient practice is likely to result in medications continuing to be administered incorrectly, increasing the risk for adverse outcomes and potential harm.The findings are:A. On 01/12/26 at 4:03 PM, during observation of medication administration, observed RN Registered Nurse (RN) #1 crush divalproex sodium (Depakote; an anticonvulsant) 500 milligrams (mg) delayed release for R #26.B. Record review of R #26 divalproex sodium 500mg delayed release medication package label does not state do not crushC. On 01/12/26 at 4:03 PM, during an interview with RN #1, she stated there is no warning on divalproex sodium label, and no indication she is unable to crush this medication.D. Record review of R #26 medication order stated Depakote Oral Tablet Delayed Release 500 MG give 1 tablet by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to properly store medical supplies located in the facility medication storage room. This deficient practice is likely to result in expired medical equipment being used for resident care leading to potential infection risk, as sterility is lost over time allowing introduction of bacteria.The findings are:A. On 01/13/26 at 12:36 PM, during an observation of the 400, 500, and 600 halls' medication storage room, observed box of ReliOn Ultra Thin Lancets (small single use needles used to puncture skin to draw blood for capillary blood sugar checks) in drawer related to blood glucose checking equipment, with an expiration date of 10/2023.B. On 01/13/26 at 12:38 PM, during an interview with RN #3, he verified ReliOn Ultra Thin Lancets expired in 2023. RN #3 stated he is unaware of the policy regarding medical supply expiration dates, but stated he thinks it should be thrown outC. On 01/13/26 at 1:37 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated it is her expectation staff does not use any expired products, all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals consistent with posted menus and food preferences were followed for 5 (R #) of 5 (R #) residents reviewed for dining when: The facility did not change nor follow the posted menus. R #22 did not receive food according to her meal ticket. R #86 was not served food according to preference. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents being unable to make informed meal choices and not receiving meals consistent with their preferences.The findings are:R #22X. Record review of R # 22's face sheet revealed R #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a long-term, progressive condition where the lungs cannot adequately transfer oxygen into the bloodstream, resulting in consistently low blood oxygen levels).X. Record review of R #22's Physician Orders revealed order, dated 12/31/25, for heart health diet (limited sodium, saturated fats,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, handled, and monitored under sanitary conditions when they failed to:Ensure food items were properly stored and protected in a manner to prevent cross contamination and outdated use.Ensure required dish machine, refrigerator, and freezer temperature daily logs were up to date.Ensure staff responsible for food safety were knowledgeable of safe food temperatures.This deficient practice could likely affect all 94 residents identified on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 01/11/26. If food was not stored, handled, and monitored under sanitary conditions then residents are at an increased risk of contracting food born illness. The findings are:Food Storage A. On 01/11/26 at 12:26pm, an observation of the facility's kitchen revealed the refrigerator contained the following:A gallon of [NAME] Golden Italian Dressing expired 11/11/25.Two gallons of Ready Set Serve Lime Juice expired 09/29/25.A 46 fluid ounce box of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interviews the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for 2 (R #'s 9 and 16) of 2 (R #'s 9 and 16) residents reviewed, when:R #9's respiratory spirometer (an instrument for measuring the air capacity of the lungs) and nebulizer (a medical device that delivers medication in the form of a fine mist directly into the lungs) was not stored appropriately to maintain cleanliness. The facility failed to administer a new medication for R #16 after a medication was removed from packaging which fell on top of medication cart and was placed back into medication cup by nurse. This deficient practice is likely to result in the transmission of infectious agents to the residents.The findings are: R #9: A. Record review of R #9's face sheet revealed R #9 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #9's care plan dated 06/30/25 revealed R #9 requires oxygen (O2) use due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; lung disease). C. On 01/12/26 at 2:51 pm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 (an acute respiratory infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) vaccinations that included staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining a COVID-19 vaccine, and the COVID-19 vaccine status of staff and related information was available for all staff that work in the facility. This deficient practice could likely lead to residents contracting respiratory infections and could result in the spread of infection to other residents.The findings are: A. Record review of the facility infection control documentation/vaccinations reviewed on 01/15/25 revealed facility staff vaccination lists were not available for review. B. On 01/15/26 at 1:47 pm during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #1/Infection Preventionist (IP), she stated she does not have the facility staff COVID-19 vaccinations status list, and she does not provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 62 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication (medication used to treat mental health conditions) consent forms were signed by the resident or resident representative prior to medication administration for 3 (R #'s 3, 6, and 8) of 3 (R #'s 3, 6, and 8) residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic drugs. This deficient practice is likely to put residents at an increased risk for undesirable side effects (including but not limited to; increased thoughts of suicide, insomnia, fatigue, sexual dysfunction) associated with the use of these medications.The findings are:R #3: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #3's physician orders dated October and November 2025 revealed the following: 10/08/25: Buspirone HCL (anti-anxiety medication), give 10 mg (milligrams) by mouth three times a day for anxiety. Order was discontinued on 11/04/25. 11/04/25: Buspirone HCL, give 15 mg by mouth three times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (R #25) of 1 (R #25) resident reviewed, when:Facility nursing staff used threatening language via text messages to R #25 while on approved facility leave. A facility nurse inappropriately touched R #25's foot when he returned to the facility after approved facility leave. If the facility performs inappropriate use of text messaging and touching, then residents are at risk for physical injury and psychological harm, including fear or distress related to staff interactions. The findings are: A. Record review of R #25's face sheet revealed R #25 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #25's nursing progress notes dated 12/28/25 revealed the following: 12/28/25 at 3:54 am: R #25 was not in his room, sign out log indicated R #25 signed out of the facility on 12/26/25 at 10:20 am to go home. R #25's cellphone was called, but R #25 did not answer. R #25's wife was called, and she stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR; a federal requirement to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) Level 1 screening was completed accurately for 1 (R#6) of 1(R #6) resident reviewed, when the PASRR level 1 indicated no mental health diagnosis despite admission documentation identifying a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). This deficient practice could result in the facility failing to identify and address residents' mental health needs and ensure appropriate screening and services at admission.The findings are:A. Record review of R # 6's face sheet revealed R #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:Unspecified dementia, moderate, with agitation (a group of conditions characterized by impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 (R #11) of 1 (R #11) resident reviewed for oxygen (O2) use. If the facility is not updating the care plan to reflect the residents' current care areas and treatment, then the facility may not be providing the appropriate care and treatment to meet the residents' needs. The findings are:A. Record review of R #11's face sheet revealed R #11 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #11's physician orders dated 12/16/25 revealed R #11 was prescribed O2 at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (a small, flexible tube that delivers oxygen to the nose through soft prongs). C. Record review of R #11's care plan dated 12/23/25 revealed O2 use was not care planned for R #11. D. On 01/15/26 at 9:56 am during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2, he confirmed R #11 wears O2 every day. E. On 01/15/26 at 3:09 pm during an interview with the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), she confirmed R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided in accordance with professional standards for 1 (R #25) of 3 (R #21, 25 and 60) when staff administered pain medication to a resident when the resident reported pain levels of 2 - 7, which did not meet the physician's ordered parameters of 8 or higher. If staff are not following physicians' orders then residents are at risk of being over medicated and may have inadequate pain control. The findings are:Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided in accordance with professional standards for 1 (R #25) of 3 (R #25, #00 and 00) when staff administered pain medication to a resident when the resident reported pain levels of 00 - 00, which did not meet the physician's ordered parameters of 00 -00. If staff are not following physicians' orders then residents are at risk of being over medicated and may have inadequate pain control. The findings are:A. On 01/12/2026 at 3:09 pm during an interview, R #25 stated that sometimes the facility does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews; the facility failed to acquire medications for 1 (R #61) of 9 (R 35, R #16, R #26, R #58, R #61, R #65, R #67, R #89, and R #103) residents. This deficient practice is likely to result in missed doses of medication continuing, and potentially lead to serious harm, exacerbation of disease process, or other adverse outcomes for residents.The findings are:A. On 01/12/26 at 4:18PM, during an observation of medication administration, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 administering medications for R #61, Symbicort aerosol 160-4.5 mcg (micrograms)/act (per actuation/puff) inhaler (budesonide [a bronchodilator]/formoterol [a steroid]; inhaled medication to expand lungs and airway) not administered.B. On 01/12/26 at 4:18PM during an interview with RN #1, she stated the medication is not available and is not present in Rx Now machine (a device for storing medications) as an emergency supply. RN #1 stated she spoke with pharmacy regarding inhaler for R #61, currently awaiting delivery of medication.C. Record review of R #61 medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of all investigations of allegations of abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown source were submitted to the State Agency within 5 working days for 1(R #1) of 1(R #1) resident. If the facility is not submitting the five-day follow-up, residents are likely to be at risk of further abuse/neglect. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's investigations revealed that a 5 day follow up had not been submitted to the state agency. B. On 09/29/25 at 5:21 pm during an interview with the facility's Administrator, he confirmed that a five day follow up had not been submitted to the state agency.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegation of abuse for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for abuse. If staff do not thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse, then the other residents are at risk of abuse which may cause physical, emotional, and psychological harm. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to acute care hospital on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, but not limited to: -Acute (sudden onset) kidney failure (sudden loss of kidney function) -Hydroureter (swelling of the ureter [duct by which urine passes from the kidney to the bladder] due to urine buildup) -Obstructive (blockage) and reflux (the flow of a fluid through a vessel or valve in the body in a direction opposite to normal) uropathy (blockage in the urinary tract), unspecified -Need for assistance with personal care -Personal history of malignant (tern to describe active cancer cells or tumors)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to: 1. Ensure opened food items in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage room were dated and labeled. 2. Ensure staff utilized a sanitizing solution when cleaning various food related surfaces. 3. Ensure eggs and cheese were stored in a manner to prevent food borne pathogen growth when not in the refrigerator. 4. Ensure all storage areas are kept clean and free of debris. 5. Ensure kitchen staff wore their face mask appropriately. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 85 residents listed on the resident census list and are likely lead to foodborne illnesses if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 12/05/24 at 8:40 am, an observation of the facility kitchen revealed the following: - Eight eggs and a small package of sliced cheese sat on a cart next to the kitchen stove. The eggs and cheese sat for one hour and were not on ice. The eggs were warm to touch,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0559 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to give written notice for a room change, including the reason for the change, before the residents were moved for 2 (R #1 and R #3) of 2 (R #1 and R #3) residents. This deficient practice is likely to result in frustration and confusion for residents. The findings are: Findings for R #1: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet, dated 11/25/24, revealed the following: - admission date of 09/12/24. - Other drug induced secondary Parkinsonism (symptoms that may occur due to the side effects of taking certain medications.) - Dementia, mild, with other behavioral disturbance (a disease that causes loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities.) - Disorganized schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by speech, emotional expressions, thoughts, and actions that are disorganized or not in tune with what is expected or appropriate.) - Cognitive communication deficit (difficulty understanding and speaking with other people.) - Other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. B. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 (R #5, #6 and #7) of 3 (R #5, #6 and #7) residents reviewed had a working portable concentrator. This deficient practice is likely to have a resident become hypoxic (having too little oxygen in the blood). The findings are: R #5 A. Record review of physicians orders for R #5, dated 12/16/23, revealed oxygen (O2) administered at 2 liters per minute (LPM) continuous per nasal cannula (a medical device that consists of a small, flexible tube with two prongs that sit inside a patient's nostrils), face mask, or facial tent via O2 concentrator or tank. B. On 11/25/24 at 12:15 pm during an observation, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 checked R #5's portable O2 concentrator and stated there was not any oxygen coming out of the concentrator and not functioning. CNA #1 asked Minimum Data Set (MDS) Director #1 to check R #5's oxygen saturations, and R #5's oxygen saturation measured 82 percent (%; ideal oxygen saturations 95% to 100%). CNA #1 and MDS director were unsure as to how long R #5's concentrator had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Providers (Physicians and Nurse Practitioners) of a change in condition in which a resident began to have behaviors for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed for change of condition. If the physician is not notified of changes in residents status then residents are likely to not get the care needed. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet, dated 11/25/24, revealed the following: - admission date of 09/12/24. - Other drug induced secondary Parkinsonism (symptoms that may occur due to the side effects of taking certain medications.) - Dementia In other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, with other behavioral disturbance (a disease that causes loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities.) - Disorganized schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by speech, emotional expressions, thoughts, and actions that are disorganized or not in tune with what is expected or appropriate.) - Cognitive communication deficit (difficulty understanding and speaking with other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and document a thorough investigation had been done for 1 (R #1) of 2 (R #1 and #8) residents reviewed for an allegation of abuse. If the facility fails to complete thorough investigations residents are likely to feel frustrated and unsafe. The findings are: R #1 and R #8 A. Record review of the facility's Follow Up Report to the State Agency, dated 10/29/24 at 5:19 pm, revealed the following: 1. R #1 was in the dining room with R #8 and waited for meal service. 2. Both residents held hands and kissed each other's hands. 3. R #1 leaned in and kissed R #8 on the lips as R #8's husband entered the dining room. 4. R #8's husband became upset and alerted staff to what happened. B. Record review of R #1's behavior charting, dated 10/24/24, revealed R #1 tried to encourage a female resident to come to his room or he tried to enter their rooms. Resident held hands with female residents and kissed their hands. Interventions attempted: Reminded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include required information in the residents medical record for transfer or discharge for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed for discharges. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident and residents family being unable to locate an appropriate placement putting the residents at risk of an unsafe discharge. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet, dated 11/25/24, revealed the following: - admission date of 09/12/24. - Other drug induced secondary Parkinsonism (symptoms that may occur due to the side effects of taking certain medications.) - Dementia In other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, with other behavioral disturbance (a disease that causes loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities.) - Disorganized schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by speech, emotional expressions, thoughts, and actions that are disorganized or not in tune with what is expected or appropriate.) -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and an observation of the [NAME] Unit, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart remained locked when not in use. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents having access to the medications in the unlocked medication cart. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Security of Medication Cart Policy, dated April 2007, revealed medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view. B. On 12/02/24 at 12:18 pm during an observation of the [NAME] Unit, the medication cart was unlocked and unattended. Further observation revealed nursing personnel were not present, and residents walked around and sat close to the unlocked medication cart. C. On 12/02/24 at 12:19 pm during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, he confirmed the medication cart should be locked at all times when not in use. RN #1 further stated he stepped away to assist another resident and was aware he should have locked the cart.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staff to meet the needs of all 77 residents who resided in the facility when staff failed to: 1. Offer baths or showers to residents as scheduled and per resident preference. 2. Effectively communicate with residents to meet their needs. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact resident comfort. The findings are: Resident Baths and Showers: A. Refer to F561 and F677 for related findings. B. On 09/25/24 at 1:23 pm during an interview with an anonymous staff member (ASM), they stated the facility did not have enough staff which resulted in resident baths or showers being missed often. C. On 09/25/24 at 3:34 pm during an interview with CNA #1, she stated sometimes the facility will experience short staffing, and resident baths and showers get missed when that happens. D. On 09/25/24 at 4:02 pm during an interview with CNA #2, she stated there was not enough staff to clean up resident beds and give residents baths and showers. CNA #2 also stated there is not any staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when staff failed to: - Store food in a manner that prevented cross contamination when staff did not label and date open food items. - Utilize hair restraints and beard guards in a manner which restrained all hair while in the kitchen. - Test the sanitizer level in a sanitizing bucket. - Failure to store ice scoop appropriately. These failures have the potential to result in cross contamination, the growth of foodborne pathogens, and foodborne illness. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The findings are: Unlabeled and Undated Food Items: A. On 09/22/24 at 3:55 pm, observation of the Dietary Department refrigerators and freezers revealed the following: - One 6 ounce (oz) bowl of ice cream not labeled or dated. - One tray of 16 glasses of 8 oz. clear liquid not labeled or dated. - One 5 pound (lb) bag of radishes open to air, not dated. - One tray of unidentified food not labeled or dated. - One tray of 6 oz. glasses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote resident choices for 2 (R #72 and #175) of 2 (R #72 and #175) residents reviewed for choices when staff failed to: 1. Accommodate R #72's choice to have his pacemaker (a device that stimulates the heart rate when it is beating too slowly) monitor present in the facility. 2. Offer R #175 showers per his preference. These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident's personal choices not being honored. The findings are: R #72: A. Record review of R #72's face sheet revealed R #72 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). B. Record review of R #72's Care Plan Conference notes, dated 09/11/24, revealed R #72 had a pacemaker (a device surgically implanted in the body to deliver electrical pulses to the heart to help the heart beat in a regular rhythm) implanted in December, 2023 and had a pacemaker monitor at home. Family will bring it in and let them know to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays for all 77 residents who resided at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving timely communication which could result in feelings of isolation. The findings are: A. On 09/24/24 at 1:15 PM during the Resident Council meeting, the residents stated staff did not deliver mail to them on the weekends, but they thought staff should. B. On 09/26/24 at 9:06 AM during an interview with the Activities Director, she stated staff did not deliver mail on the weekends to the residents. She stated if the Post Office delivered mail to the front office on the weekend, then staff put it in the activities mail box for her to deliver on Monday. C. On 09/26/24 at 2:16 PM during an interview with the Administrator, she stated the expectation was for residents to get their mail on the weekends if that was when the Post Office delivered it to the facility.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 4 (R #19, #39, #71, and #72) of 4 (R #19, #39, #71, and #72) residents reviewed when staff failed to: 1. Update the care plan to include a wander guard (wearable technology used to keep residents from wandering or eloping from the facility unattended) use for R #19 and #39. 2. Update the care plan to include family assistance with activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) care for R #71. 3. Update the care plan to include the use of a fall mat for R #72. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: R #19: A. On 9/22/24 at 5:12 PM during a random observation, R #19 wore a wander guard. B. Record review of R #19's care plan, dated 07/25/24, revealed staff did not care plan R #19's use of a wander guard. C. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths and showers by the facility staff for 1 (R #58) of 1 (R #58) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #58's face sheet revealed R #58 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #58's care plan, dated 03/05/24, revealed the following: - Focus: R #58 had an ADL self-care deficit related to a history of fractures. - Interventions: Shower at least once a week and as needed. - R #58 was dependent on staff for bathing. C. Record review of the facility's bath and shower schedule revealed R #58 was scheduled to bathe or shower on Wednesdays and Saturdays. D. Record review of R #58's documentation survey report (Activities of Daily Living - ADL tracking form),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide restorative physical therapy service devices as recommended by the therapy department for 1 (R #37) of 1 (R #37) residents. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents having pain and a decrease in mobility, causing psychosocial harm and despair. The findings are: A. Record review of R #37's face sheet revealed R #37 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Encephalopathy (a disease that affects brain structure or function and causes altered mental state and confusion). 2. Muscle weakness. 3. Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). B. Record review of R #37's care plan, dated 06/23/23, revealed R #37 required assistance to meet basic activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) care due to quadriplegia to include assistance with transfers and ensuring R #37's call light was in reach for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 (R #12 and #62) of 2 (R #12 and #62) residents reviewed for behavioral health concerns received necessary behavioral health care to meet their needs when staff failed to ensure effective communication between the facility and psychiatric providers and provide consistent psychiatric services to meet R #12 and #62 psychiatric service needs. These deficient practices are likely to result in the residents not receiving the behavioral or mental health care and assistance needed to improve mood and reduce depression and anxiety. The findings are: R #12: A. Record review of R #12's face sheet revealed R #12 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #12's care plan, dated 09/15/22, revealed R #12 had a diagnoses of depression, and facility staff should monitor R #12 for any signs of depression. C. Record review of R #12's nursing progress notes, dated 07/13/24, revealed Psychiatric Services Provider (PSP) #1 saw R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 4 (R #13, #21, #48, and #6) out of 5 residents (R #13, #21, #48, #6 and #14) reviewed for immunizations had completed and signed consent/refusal forms on file to show they consented to or declined the pneumococcal (for pneumonia, an infection in one or both lungs) and influenza (flu) vaccines. If residents are not vaccinated as appropriate against pneumonia and influenza they have a higher likelihood of contracting that illness and spreading it to other residents and staff in the facility. The findings are: A. Record review of facility's Policies and Procedures for Pneumococcal and Influenza Prevention and Control, revised on 06/2020, revealed the resident's medical record should include documentation to indicate, at minimum, the resident consented or refused vaccinations. Findings for R #13 B. Record review of R #13's immunization record revealed the resident received the flu vaccination on 09/30/23, but the medical record did not contain documentation of the provision of education regarding the benefits and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required in-service training of at least 12 hours per year for 2 (CNAs #3 and #4) of 5 (CNAs #3,#4, #5, #6, and #7) CNAs randomly reviewed for required in-service training. This deficient practice is likely to result in the nurses aides not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents. The findings are: CNA #3: A. Record review of the facility staffing list revealed CNA #3 was hired on 06/17/19. B. Record review of CNA #3's annual in-service training, dated 06/17/23 through 06/17/24, revealed CNA #3 did not complete at least 12 hours of required in-service training. C. Record review of the facility staffing schedule, dated 08/01/24 through 08/31/2,4 revealed CNA #3 worked seven CNA shifts in the facility during that timeframe. D. On 09/26/24 at 3:28 pm during an interview with the Administrator (ADM), she confirmed CNA #3 did not complete the required 12 hours of in-service training but should have. CNA #4: E. Record review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 1 (R #19) of 1 (R #19) residents reviewed for residents' rights by placing a WanderGuard (a bracelet that sets off an alarm when the person wearing it attempts to exit the building) on a resident who did not attempt to leave the facility grounds. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents feeling as if they were kept in the facility against their will. The findings are: A. On 9/22/24 at 5:12 PM during a random observation, R #19 wore a wander guard. B. Record review of R #19's physicians orders revealed the resident did not have an order for a wander guard. C. Record review of #19's care plan, dated 07/25/24, revealed staff did not care plan the resident's wander guard. D. Record review of R #19's Elopement Risk Evaluation, dated 7/25/24, revealed the following: - Score of 6, moderate risk; - No Risk section: If yes to question A1 or A2, the assessment is complete. - Section A1: Resident was able to make decisions regarding task of daily living? Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 (R #75) of 1 (R #75) residents reviewed for falls: 1. When the facility failed to routinely assess R #75 to check for injuries following the first fall. 2. When the facility failed to follow post-fall protocols after R #75's first and second falls. These deficient practices likely resulted in R #75 having falls with injuries that required treatment at the hospital. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Response to Fall policy, undated, revealed guidance for staff regarding post-fall assessment and monitoring: Following each resident fall, the licensed nurse to complete an incident report and perform a post-fall assessment and investigation. B. Record review of the facility's neurological assessment policy, dated 02/2019, revealed nursing staff should complete a neurological assessment after a resident fall as follows: - Every 30 minutes four times; - Every hour four times; - Every four hours four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that ileostomy [a surgical procedure in which the last part of the small intestine (ileum) is connected to the abdominal wall and an opening (stoma) is created in the abdominal wall to allow waste to leave the body] care was consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (R #13) of 1 (R #13) resident when the ostomy bag and the abdominal binder (wide compression belt that encircles the abdomen) was not consistently offered/applied per physician order. This deficient practice could likely result in skin breakdown/infection around the ostomy opening. The findings are: A. Record review of R #13''s face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #13's physician's orders revealed the following: 1. Dated 12/21/23, change ileostomy bag per wound orders. When resident refused ostomy (ileostomy) bag or continually removed bag, cleanse skin surrounding ostomy two times per shift daily. Cleanse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Elopement Risk Evaluation was accurate for 1 (R #19) of 1 ( R #19) residents reviewed when staff did not accurately complete R #19's evaluation to reflect the resident's elopement risk. This deficient practice is likely to result in resident not receiving the appropriate care and treatment he may need. The findings are: A. Record review of R #19's Elopement Risk Evaluation, dated 7/25/24, revealed the following: - Score of 6, moderate risk; - No Risk section: If yes to question A1 or A2, the assessment is complete. - Section A1: Resident was able to make decisions regarding task of daily living? Staff answered no. - Section A2: Resident was unable to ambulate or mobilize wheelchairs? Staff answered yes. - Moderate Risk section: Resident was cognitive impaired and staff entered the following information: - Resident ambulated or propelled self; - Resident may go outdoors on occasion but did not make an attempt to leave grounds. - Action: Implement Elopement Risk Care Plan. - Imminent Risk section: Staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the bedroom for 1 of (R#3) of 1 (R #3) residents was clean, without food debris and used medical equipment on the floor. This deficient practice is likely to make the resident feel as if he was not important and he did not matter to the facility. The findings are: A. On 09/23/24 at 11:03 am during an observation and interview, R #3's room floor was dirty and sticky. There were food crumbs present by R #3, who sat in a wheelchair by the television, and there was an unknown yellow colored liquid on the floor next to R #3. Two of R #3's urinals lay on the nightstand, and the other one urinal lay on the floor near his bed. R #3's roommates side of the room was clean. R #3 stated the staff cleaned his room every now and then when they get a chance. R #3 stated there were times when his room was not cleaned by housekeeping staff. B. On 09/23/24 at 11:07 am during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, she stated R #3's room was dirty and should be cleaned. LPN #3 stated she did not know why R #3's room was so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote residents' choices for 2 (R #4 and #5) of 2 (R #4 and #5) residents reviewed for choices when staff placed a bladder control pad (products made for incontinence control to pull moisture away from your skin) in the briefs of residents. These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident's personal choices, needs, and preferences not being honored. The findings are: A. On 05/09/24 at 2:58 pm during an interview with an anonymous former staff member, they stated Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) sometimes put a bladder control pad in the resident's brief so it did not leak. The former staff stated residents wear bladder control pads in their briefs a lot, because the CNAs did not want to change the residents as often. The former staff also stated CNAs would utilize the bladder control pads without asking for the residents' permission sometimes. B. On 05/10/24 at 10:24 am during an interview with CNA #2, she stated the facility did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, 2, 3) residents reviewed for falls. If the facility is not updating the care plan to reflect the resident's current care needs and treatments, then the facility may not be providing the appropriate care to meet the resident's needs. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include: - Urinary tract infection. - Personal history of transient ischemic attack (small minor stroke of unknown cause with short duration). - Cerebral infarction (a blood vessel located in the brain that is blocked reducing or stopping blood flow to that area) without residual deficits (no lasting effects). - Unspecified fall. - Cognitive communication deficit (inability to effectively speak with and understand others). B. Record review of R #1's daily care notes revealed staff documented the following: - On 10/04/23, a Certified Nurses Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents and resident representatives have a right to voice grievances to the facility without fear of discrimination or retaliation (the act of hurting someone or doing something harmful to someone, because they have done or said something harmful to you) for 7 (Anonymous residents/representatives) identified during random review. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not getting the care and assistance needed or feel like they must discharge from the facility to get the care needed/desired which may be further away from family support. The findings are: A. During interview, Anonymous Family (AF) Member #1 stated there have been several issues with their family member regarding showers, wound care, and food while at the facility. However, when she brought her concerns to the former Head Nurse, he/she was told they could take their family member somewhere else. B. During interview, AF #2 stated they had concerns about their family member's/resident's care regarding wounds, showers, feeding assistance, pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff updated the care plan to reflect the current conditions for 2 (R #5 ad 14) of 2 (R #5 and 14) residents reviewed during random observation. If the care plan is not updated to reflect the residents current conditions, then residents may not get the care and assistance needed. The findings are: Findings related to R #5 A. On 09/19/23 at 4:00 pm, during interview, the State Ombudsman (SO) reported that during a recent onsite visit on 09/08/23, she observed R #5 was on the edge of the bed, leaning and ready to fall over. She said staff told her this [leaned over at edge of bed] was the way R #5 preferred to sleep. The SO verified that it [position of sleeping] was not in the resident's care plan. B. Record review of R #5's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnosis: - Unspecified dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the residents' interests and support residents' psychosocial well-being for 5 (R #1, 4, 11, 12 and 13) of 5 (R #1, 4, 11, 12 and 13) residents reviewed for activities and during random observation. If the facility is not providing engaging activities to residents then residents are at risk of boredom, depression, and decrease in quality of life. The findings are: A. On 09/20/23 at 10:23 am, during an interview, R #1 stated, I like to play bingo, but we have not played BINGO in about 3 weeks and they don't offer any other activities. B. On 09/20/23 at 10:45 am, during observation, Today's Activities Schedule, posted on bulletin board in Dining Room Hallway, was dated 9/7/23. C. On 09/21/23 at 12:14 pm, Please clarify the time during an interview, R #13 stated, I like to draw and paint and play bingo, but no activities were offered yesterday or today. D. On 09/21/23 at 12:17 pm, during an interview, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 stated, There are no activities planned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff monitor anxiety symptoms and the effectiveness of anxiety medications being administered for 1(R #4) of 1(R #4) resident identified during random observation. If the facility is not monitoring for the use of psychotropic medications then resident may not be getting adequate relief and treatment from symptoms. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's face sheet identified she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: - Encephalopathy (disease that affects brain structure and functioning causing altered mental state and confusion), - Epilespy (neurological disorder that causes seizures or unusual sensation and behaviors), - Quadriplegia (loss of motor functioning and sensation from the neck down) and chronic pain. - This is not all inclusive. B. Record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R #4, dated September 2023, identified R #4 has available Lorazepam (antianxiety) medication,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the medical record accurately reflected resident's level of assistance and advanced directives for 6 (R #2, 7, 9, 14, 15 and 16) of 16 (R #1-16) residents reviewed for feeding assistance and during random observation. If resident medical records are not accurate, then there is not an accurate history of residents care. The findings are: Findings related to Advanced Directives: A. Record review of R #7's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #7's progress notes, dated 08/10/23 at 1:00 pm, revealed Code Status: DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) - No CPR (Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation) Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (allow natural death). C. Record review of R #7's New Mexico Medical Orders For Scope of Treatment (MOST) form, dated 06/03/22, also known as an advanced directives (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment created to ensure those wishes are carried out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light functioned for 2 (R #4 and R #8) of 4 (R #2, #4, #8 and #13) resident reviewed for call lights within reach and during random observation. If residents are unable to request staff assistance when needed then residents are likely not able to get their needs met. The findings are: Findings related to R #4: A. Record review of R #4's Care Plan, dated 06/23/23, revealed, [Name of R #4] requires assistance to meet basic ADL self care and performance r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) of quadriplegia. Interventions included Be sure call light is within reach and encourage to use it for assistance. Respond promptly to all requests for assistance. B. On 09/20/23 at 12:17 pm, during observation and interview, R #4 laid in bed. Her right and left arm were contracted (permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin and surrounding tissue that causes the joints to be shorten and stiffen) and bent in a fixed position at the wrist, with fingers bent inward. R #4 stated she wanted to take her pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide accommodation of residents needs for 1(R #4) of 4 (R #2, 4, 8 and 13) residents reviewed for call lights within reach and during random observation, when the call light/pressure pad call light was not within resident's reach. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents being unable to request assistance, such as needing help with transferring, after falling, or other acute distress. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) Assessment, dated 09/13/23, identified limited mobility/ROM (range of motion), quadriplegia (loss of motor functioning and sensation from the neck down), chair bound and painful to be up in wheelchair, stayed in bed for meals. under the Skilled Observation Musculoskeletal (the human body system that provides our body with movement, stability, shape, and support) section. B. Record review of R #4's Care Plan, dated 06/23/23, revealed [Name of R #4] requires assistance to meet basic ADL (activities of daily living) self care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of resident change in conditions which required hospital transfer for 2 (R #1 and 8) of 2 (R #1 and 8) residents reviewed for wound care and during random observations. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident representative unable to provide advocacy and make medical decision when needed. The findings are: Findings for R #1: A. On 09/20/23 at 10:23 am during interview, R #1 reported she was recently sent to the emergency room due to pain in her foot and later flown to another hospital. B. Record review of Nursing Progress Notes for R #1 revealed: 1. 08/23/23, At approx. 10 am, [Name of Physician #1] examined pts (patients) right foot and found it cold to the touch and requested her to be sent to the [Name of Hospital ER]. Report called to ER and ambulance called. 10:40 transferred [Initials of Hospital]. Note did not identify that R #1's POA (Power of Attorney) was notified. 2. 08/30/23 She was sent out 8/23/23 with severe right foot pain, right foot was cold and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident observed during random observation was free from neglect when facility staff failed to respond to R #4's cries/yelling out. This deficient practice could likely result in residents going without the assistance, care, or treatment needed and/or experiencing feelings of helplessness and not being cared for, resulting in mental anguish (a degree of mental pain and suffering that arises from another person's negligence - failure to exercise the care that a reasonably sensible person would exercise in like circumstances). The findings are: A. On 09/19/23 at 4:00 pm, during interview, State Ombudsman (SO) reported that during recent onsite visits at the facility, she observed R #4 laid in bed and slept throughout the visit. SO reported she asked the Director of Nursing (DON) to move R #4 closer to the nurse's station so staff could watch her more closely. B. Record review of R #4's Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) Assessment, dated 09/13/23, identified limited mobility/ROM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0774 — isolated
    Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transport residents to physician appointments for 1 (R #8) of 1 (R #8) resident reviewed for follow up appointments. This deficient practice could likely cause delays in needed care and/or treatment prolonging the healing process. The findings are: A. Record review of R #8's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #8's History and Physical Note, dated 09/13/23, revealed, New admission to facility 9/9/2023 .Admitting diagnosis: aftercare following right knee prosthetic explant (devices or tissues that are placed inside or on the surface of the body) and an articulating antibiotic spacer implant (device used to treat infection after a total knee replacement). Chronic septic arthritis (infection of the joint). C. On 09/21/23 at 12:45pm, during an interview, R #8 stated, These people (the facility) cancelled my post op (operation) appointment for my knee (right) on Tuesday (09/19/23). D. On 09/21/23 at 2:43pm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews the facility failed to ensure that they had sufficient staff to guarantee the needs of all 88 residents residing in the facility. 1. Offering baths/showers to residents; 2. Changing residents briefs timely; 3. Having enough facility staff to meet the needs of the residents. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact resident safety, comfort, and to impede processes such as timely incontinence care (assisting residents to the bathroom or changing adult briefs), regular turning schedules (moving or turning residents that need assistance and are unable to move on their own), timely showers and appropriate assistance with meals. Baths/Showers Findings: A. On 08/09/23 at 10:30 PM, during an interview, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #5 stated sometimes it is tough with the showers. Sometimes they do not get finished with showers, because the facility does not have enough CNA's. B. On 08/09/23 at 10:35 PM, during an interview, CNA #4 stated there are many times there is not enough staff to complete all the tasks that need to get done. (For example…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for all 88 residents, listed on the resident census provided on 08/07/23. If staff do not follow the menu and do not have the specified menu items on hand to meet this requirement then residents are not likely to not receive the appropriate nutrition. The findings are: A. On 08/07/23 at 5:10 PM, during observation of the dinner meal, staff served the residents a bologna and cheese sandwich. B. Record review of the menu for 08/07/23 identified ham and cheese sandwiches to be served for dinner. C. On 08/07/23 at 5:13 PM, during an interview, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated bologna was served instead of ham, because the ham was not available. D. Record review of the facility menu for 08/13/23 revealed staff to serve scrambled eggs and bacon for breakfast and taco salad for dinner. E. On 08/13/23 at 11:08 AM, during an interview, Kitchen [NAME] (KC) #1 stated, We had no coffee and no scrambled eggs. Sometimes we do not have ingredients, and we run out of food for Sundays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-15 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Provide hydration between meals; 2. Provide coffee during breakfast meal. These deficient practices are likely affect all 88 residents listed on the census as provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/07/23 and likely result in residents becoming at increased risk for dehydration. The findings are: A. On 08/07/23 02:38 PM, during an interview, R #37 stated, There is no fresh water, and it is 4:00 in the afternoon. R #37 stated staff had not delivered fresh water on 08/07/23, and it was late into the day. B. On 08/08/23 at 9:11 AM, during Resident Council Meeting, R #2 stated, We have not been getting water between meals for a while now, especially on weekends. C. On 08/08/23 at 2:23 pm, during an interview, R #35 stated she had not been getting water between meals. D. On 08/13/23 at 11:04 AM, during interview, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated staff had not provided water/hydration to the residents last night [08/12/23] or this morning [08/13/23], because they were short on staff. E. On 08/13/23 at 10:57 AM during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to deliver meals consistently and timely for all 88 residents in the facility. This deficient practice could potentially lead to frustration and hunger. The findings are: A. Record review of meal times revealed: - Breakfast scheduled at 7:30 AM - Lunch scheduled at 11:30 AM - Dinner scheduled at 5:00 PM B. On 08/07/23 at 12:30 PM, during dining observation of lunch meal, residents were observed sitting at tables and had not received their meal. C. On 08/09/23 at 8:33 AM, during dining observation of the breakfast meal, staff began to pass hall trays to the residents at 8:30 AM, and they passed the last hall tray at 8:49 AM. D. On 08/15/23 , during an interview, Dietary Manager stated they have a delay on getting the meals served on time to the residents, because CNA's (Certified Nurse Assistants) are not available.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a comprehensive antibiotic stewardship program (a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use). This deficient practice has the potential to affect any of the 88 residents identified on the census provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/07/23, and who might be placed on antibiotics, which could result in the inappropriate use of antibiotics and that can lead to resistance of multi-drug resistant organisms. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program Policies and Procedures, dated 06/2020, revealed, Leadership: The facility's leadership team will identify an Infection Preventionist (IP) who will collaborate with the Medical Director to oversee the Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) for the facility. 1. The facility's leadership team will communicate the mission, goals, and expectations of the ASP with attending physicians and staff. 2. If indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to respond to resident grievances, regarding another resident yelling and cussing, for 1 (R #61) of 1 (R #61) resident reviewed. If the facility fails to respond to residents' grievances then residents are likely to feel uncomfortable and could exacerbate (make worse) health issues. The findings are: A. On 08/08/23 at 10:35 AM, during an interview, R #61 stated her neighbor yells and uses foul language all day and night, and it is very disturbing. She further stated she has complained to nursing staff and filed a grievance (unsure of date) and nothing has been done. B. On 08/08/23 at 10:40 AM, during observation and interview with R #6, this writer heard R #61's neighbor yell in a very loud voice, and R #61 stated That's what I'm talking about. C. On 08/15/23 at 9:30 AM, during interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was familiar with R #61's neighbor. She stated he had behaviors and yelled. She further stated staff could move R #61's neighbor, but staff had not initiated the move. The DON confirmed she was unaware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for 4 (R #'s 14, 37, 59 and 91) out of 5 (R #'s 1, 14, 37, 59, and 91) residents reviewed by: 1. Not conducting quarterly care plan meetings as required for R #'s 14, 37, and 59; 2. Not updating a care plan to reflect oxygen (O2) use for R #59 and hospice (health care that focuses on the palliation of a terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services for R #91. These deficient practices are likely to result in staff not being aware of residents care needs and preferences, and residents not receiving the needed care. The findings are: Findings for R #14: A. Record review of R #14's face sheet revealed R #14 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #14's Care Conference Assessment revealed R #14's last care conference occurred on 08/31/22. C. On 08/08/23 at 12:48 pm, during an interview, R #14 stated, It's been a long time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 (R #'s 57 and 59) of 2 (R #'s 57 and 59) residents by not 1. Changing R #57's oxygen (O2) weekly as ordered; 2. Labeling, dating, and changing O2 for R #59. If the facility is not changing and labeling oxygen tubing then residents are likely to not receive the therapeutic benefits and care needed. The findings are: Findings for R #57: A. Record review of R #57's face sheet revealed R #57 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #57's physician orders, dated 11/29/22, revealed, 2L [liters] NC [nasal cannula- device used to deliver O2 to the patients face] to keep sats [saturations] > [greater than] 88% [percent]. Sats daily and PRN [as needed] for dyspnea [shortness of breath]. C. On 08/07/23 at 3:03 pm, during an interview and observation, R #57 confirmed she wore O2 daily. R #57 was observed wearing O2 with the tubing, dated 07/28/23, connected to a concentrator. D. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for 2 (R #'s 1 and 32) of 2 (R #'s 1 and 32) residents reviewed for ADL care by not: 1. Changing R #1's wet brief; 2. Providing baths/showers for R #32. These deficient practices are likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents if they are left in wet briefs or are not offered a bath or shower on a regular basis. The findings are: R #1: A. On 08/07/23 at 4:59 PM, during an interview, R #1's Power of Attorney (POA) stated she came to visit and found R #1 sitting in a wet brief. She reported it to the nurse on duty, and the nurse sent the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to change R#1. The POA stated she will change the resident if they take too long. POA stated this has happened multiple times. B. On 08/15/23 at 12:17 PM, during interview, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 stated the POA for R #1 complained about finding the resident in a wet brief. He further stated he will check the resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assure physicians responded to the pharmacist's recommendations submitted during the pharmacist's monthly medication review and obtain physician rational, specific to the resident, which agreed or disagreed with the pharmacist's recommendations for 1 (R #2) of 6 (R #'s 1, 2, 6, 14, 35, and 79) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice is likely to cause resident medication regimen to not be properly evaluated resulting in possible over medication. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet revealed R #2 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #2's physician orders, dated 03/30/21, revealed, Clonazepam tablet, 0.5 MG [milligrams], *Controlled Drug,* Give 0.5 mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety. C. Record review of R #2's note to attending physician/prescriber (Pharmacy Review), dated 03/21/23, revealed, This resident [R #2] has been taking the anxiolytic Clonazepam 0.5 mg twice daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication (medication used to treat mental health conditions) consent forms were signed by the resident or resident representative prior to medication administration for 5 (R #'s 6, 9, 45, 52, and 56) of 5 (R #'s 6, 9, 45, 52, and 56) residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic drugs. This deficient practice is likely to put residents at an increased risk for undesirable side effects (increased thoughts of suicide, insomnia, fatigue, sexual dysfunction) associated with the use of these medications. The findings are: Findings for R #6: A. Record review of R #6's face sheet revealed R #6 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #6's physician orders, dated 06/28/23, revealed, Escitalopram Oxalate oral tablet, 5 MG [milligrams]. Give 5 mg by mouth one time a day for depression/anxiety. C. Record review of R #6's pharmacist recommendations, dated 07/18/23, revealed, The resident [R #6] has an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure expired medications are discarded and not stored in the cart; 2. Ensure expired medications were not stored with unexpired medications; 3. Ensure medications, stored on medication cart for 200 and 300 halls, were kept in their original labeled packaging and in a manner that maintains the sterility of the product. These deficient practices are likely to negatively impact the health of residents if they received expired, potentially ineffective/compromised, or contaminated medications and medical supplies due to inappropriate storage. The findings are: A. On 08/08/23 at 9:21 AM, during observation of the medication cart for the 200 and 300 halls,one half pill was loose on the bottom of the second drawer. B. On 08/08/23 at 9:34 AM, during observation of the medication storage room for the 100 and 200 units', the following expired medications were located on the wound cart; 1. One tube containing Tretinoin Cream 0.025, which expired on 07/23 and belonged to R # 54; 2. One tube containing Diclofenac Sodium 1% (percent)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's) received the required in-service training of not less than 12 hours per year for 7 (CNA #13, CNA #14, CNA #15, CNA, #16, CNA #17, CNA #18, and CNA #19) of 7 (CNA #13, CNA #14, CNA #15, CNA, #16, CNA #17, CNA #18, and CNA #19) CNA's randomly reviewed for required in-service training. This deficient practice is likely to result in the nurses aides not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility personnel files revealed the following: 1. CNA #13 was hired on 06/17/19. 2. CNA #14 was hired on 02/27/07. 3. CNA #15 was hired on 09/04/20. 4. CNA #16 was hired on 07/21/17. 5. CNA #17 was hired on 08/18/22. 6. CNA #18 was hired on 01/17/08. 7. CNA #19 was hired on 08/23/22. B. Record review of the facility staffing schedule, dated July 2023, revealed the following: 1. CNA #13 worked on 07/03-07/07 and 07/24-07/28. 2. CNA #14 worked on 07/03-07/07 and 07/24-07/28. 3. CNA #15 worked on 07/24-07/28. 4. CNA #17 worked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences for 2 (R #7 and 66) of 2 (R #7 and 66) residents reviewed by: 1. Not accommodating R #7's preference for what time she gets up in the morning; 2. Not accommodating R #66's preference of using pull-up's (disposable underwear) for incontinence (loss of bladder control). If facility is not honoring resident preferences then residents are not able to make choices about aspects of their lives which are important to them. This deficient practice is likely to result in the resident's life style, personal choices, needs, and preference not being met. The findings are: R #7 A. On 08/08/23 at 1:54 PM, during an interview with R #7, when asked if she is able to make choices about when she gets up in the morning and when she goes to bed at night, she stated, No, I'm told when to get up. I would like to get up at 7:00 am, and staff get me up between 5:00 AM and 5:30 AM. B. On 08/15/23 at 11:11 AM, during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, he stated R #7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) when an accident occurred for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed for falls. If the facility does not notify the POA when the resident has a fall then the POA is unable to make decisions related to treatment and advocate for the resident's care. The findings are: A. Record review of progress note, dated 9/22/22, RN #2 wrote R #1 had an unwitnessed fall with injury. RN #2 did not document the POA was notified. B. On 08/07/23 at 4:06 PM, during an interview, R #1's POA stated R #1 had a fall a few months ago (unsure of the date), and the staff did not notify her. She found out about the fall when she went to visit R #1 and saw a bump on her forehead. C. On 08/15/23 at 12:15 PM, during an interview, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 stated R #1 had a fall a few months ago, and she obtained a bump on her forehead. She stated, It was not on my shift, but all falls should be documented in her progress notes. D. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge plan that focused on the resident's individualized discharge goals and needs for 3 (R #'s 35, #88 and #89) of 3 (R #'s 35, #88 and #89) residents reviewed for discharge planning. This deficient practice is likely to prevent a safe transition from the facility to the resident's post-discharge setting. The findings are: Findings for R #88 and R #89 A. On 08/08/23 at 10:40 AM, during an interview, R #88 and R #89 (husband and wife residing in facility) stated they wanted to go home, and the facility was not allowing them to go home. R #89 stated they had a meeting the week prior (08/02/23), and at that time, they voiced they would like to discharge home. R #89 further stated she did not feel the facility was making any effort to assist them in making the transition. R #89 stated the facility told them they would have to leave AMA (Against Medical Advice), because they received therapy services and had not been discharged from therapy. B. On 08/09/23 at 10:58 am, during an interview, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #50) of 1 (R #50) resident, reviewed during random observation, received the appropriate supervision to prevent or minimize the risk of elopement (an unauthorized departure of a patient from an around-the-clock care setting) when the facility failed to notify facility leadership of an elopement attempt and revise the elopement risk assessment and the plan of care. This deficient practice could likely put residents at risk of unsafe situations. The findings are: A. Record review of R #50's face sheet revealed R #50 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #50's elopement risk assessment, dated 06/17/23, revealed R #50 was a Moderate Risk (an identified concern, without mitigation is likely to cause the resident to experience injury) for elopement. C. Record review of R #50's care plan, dated 06/29/23, revealed, Focus: At Risk for elopement r/t [related to] (specify): Disoriented to place, Impaired safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain oxygen (O2) equipment according to professional standards for 2 (R #'s 59 and 76) of 2 (R #'s 59 and 76) residents reviewed for respiratory care by applying R #59's O2 saline and concentrator on R #76 in error. This deficient practice could likely result in oxygen tubing not being changed according to the date of install or the previous replacement and using humidifier bottles without physician instruction. The findings are: A. Record review of R #59's face sheet revealed R #59 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #59's physician orders, dated 08/10/22, revealed, Oxygen via NC [nasal cannula- tubing device used to deliver O2 to a patient's face] @ [at] 2L [liters]/min [minute]. Titrate to keep 02 sats [SA, saturations] > [greater than] 88% [percent]. C. Record review of R #76's face sheet revealed R #76 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. D. Record review of R #76's physician orders, dated 06/22/23, revealed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure safe serving temperatures (cold foods: equal to or less than 40 degrees Fahrenheit and hot foods: equal to or greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit) were maintained for room trays awaiting to be distributed to the residents; 2. Ensure cups of milk were maintained temperature below 40 degrees. These deficient practices are likely to cause resident to suffer from food borne illnesses if food is not served at the proper temperature. The findings are: A. On 08/15/23 at 12:34 pm, during a meal time observation of the 600 unit room tray food cart, the following temperatures were observed: Chicken tortilla soup was 130 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F), Spanish rice was 120° F, broccoli was 120° F, Jell-O (lemon) was 45° F, and lemonade drink was 52° F. B. On 08/15/23 at 12:42 pm, during observation and interview, Dietary Manager (DM) used a food grade thermometer to take the temperatures of the food on trays. DM confirmed the temperature of food items and stated the food items were not at the appropriate temperatures. C. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention measures for 1(R #59) of 1(R #59) resident reviewed during random observation by: 1. Facility staff storing R #59's Oxygen (O2) tubing non-covered and on a chair and R #59's O2 tubing being on the floor. The findings are: A. Record review of R #59's face sheet revealed R #59 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #59's physician orders dated 08/10/22 revealed, Oxygen via NC [nasal cannula- tubing device used to deliver O2 to a patient's face] @ [at] 2L [liters]/min [minute]. Titrate to keep 02 sats > [greater than] 88% [percent]. C. On 08/07/23 at 3:29 pm during an interview, R #59, confirmed he wears O2 daily. R #59 was not currently wearing O2. O2 tubing including prongs (end of tubing that goes in the patient's nose) was also on the floor. R #59's back up O2 tubing was observed to be stored on a chair and not sealed. D. On 08/07/23 at 3:37 pm during an interview, Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARROYO HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2021
KENWOOD TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2021
OXFORD SQUARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2021
RIMPAU HOLDINGS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2021
SASEM INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2021
WELLINGTON HC PARTNERS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2021
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2021
HANSEN HUNTER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2025
1340 MAESTAS ROAD NM, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
EMERALD PROPERTY PARTNERS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
GIBRALTAR TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
NEW M PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
OPCO NM SKILLED MGMT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
THE WRIGHT GROUP CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
GREENE, JOLENEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/06/2023
STOLARCZYK, LISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/07/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 10%Other / private 14%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$405per resident / day
operating cost
$12,325per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$391per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next