No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Laurelhurst Post Acute & Rehabilitation

3060 SE Stark Street, Portland, OR 97214 · For profit - Corporation · 159 certified beds · (503) 535-4700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (503) 535-4700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)3 actual-harm citations$33,319 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $33,319 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-03)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
65 NE 30th Ave
Pharmacy
940 SE Cesar E Chavez Blvd · (503) 238-6053 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3301 SE Belmont St · (971) 407-3167 · Call to confirm hours
Park
SE Cesar E Chavez Blvd & Stark St · (503) 823-2525 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%4.7%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.3%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.8%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.5%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.4%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.3%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.2%81.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.8%21.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.6%16.1%12.0%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.9%CMS range 47.9–70.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.4–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 2.8–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.41
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.91
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.62
RN hoursweekends
47.1%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 103.9 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.41 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.06 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-14)
25
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse by staff for 1 of 3 residents (#40) reviewed for abuse. This resulted in skin tears, increased anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for Resident 40. Findings Include: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including depression. Resident 40's 9/27/22 cognitive assessment indicated normal cognitive function. An incident report dated 12/6/22 indicated Resident 40 was upset regarding the noise early in the morning and asked Staff 27 (Agency LPN) and Staff 29 (Agency CNA) to be quiet while looking through the curtain to her/his roommate's side. Staff 29 told Resident 40 to stay on her side of the room and pushed Resident 40 back into her/his section using the armrests of Resident 40's wheelchair which Resident 40's arms were resting on. This resulted in a 2.75 cm x .72 cm skin tear on her/his left outer forearm and a 3.56 cm x 2.1 cm skin tear on the back of her/his right hand. A 12/7/22 at 11:52 AM Progress Note indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan interventions, assess for care plan effectiveness, identify and implement new fall interventions and provide adequate supervision needed to prevent falls for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#57) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in the resident having eight falls in ten months, one with serious injury, which resulted in the resident sustaining a fractured hip requiring surgery. Findings include: Resident 57 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including anxiety, depressive disorder and schizo-affective disorder (a mental health disorder). Resident 57's 7/3/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive impairments. Resident 57 required supervision for walking in her/his room, the hallway and for toilet transfers. Resident 57 was not on a toileting program. Resident 57's 8/27/23 5 Day MDS indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of two people for toileting and transfers. The resident was not steady moving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-11-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This failure resulted in Resident 57 having eight falls in ten months, one with serious injury which resulted in the resident sustaining a fractured hip requiring surgery. Findings include: The facility's 2/2017 Staffing Policy indicated the following: -The facility provided sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. -Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff were determined by the needs of the residents based on each resident's plan of care. Resident 57 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including anxiety, depressive disorder and schizo-affective disorder (a mental health disorder). Resident 57's 7/3/23 Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate pain management for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#78) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for pain and discomfort. Findings include:Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aftercare following knee replacement surgery and pain.The 6/11/26 Hospital Discharge Instructions indicated staff were to administer oxycodone PRN (1-3 tablets of 5 mg-15 mg oxycodone) and Tylenol 500 mg at bedtime. The last documented administration of oxycodone 5 mg occurred on 6/11/26 at 8:42 AM.The 6/11/26 at 9:52 PM, admission Nursing Collection Tool revealed Resident 78 reported sharp left knee pain with a pain level of five, affecting sleep, social activities, physical activity, mobility, and emotions.The 6/12/26 at 1:20 PM, MAR revealed Resident 78 received oxycodone 5 mg and reported pain level of nine. (approximately 18 hours later)The 6/15/25 Pain care plan indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure x-rays were obtained as ordered for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#128) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment. Findings include: Resident 128 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with a diagnosis of a pelvic fracture. Progress Notes revealed the following:-3/1/26 Resident 128's physician was notified Resident 128 had an unwitnessed fall; her/his oxygen saturation was 85 percent on room air; oxygen was applied and her/his oxygen levels increased to 93 percent. -3/1/26 Resident 128's physician response included stat (to be done immediately) chest x-ray. Resident 128's clinical record did not have x-rays obtained on 3/1/26.On 6/25/26 at 9:24 AM Staff 18 (RN) stated if an x-ray was ordered stat, the order was to be completed the day it was ordered. If the x-ray technician was not able to come to the facility, the physician was to be notified. On 6/26/26 at 10:32 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated stat orders were to be obtained within four to six hours. Staff 2 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered for 4 of 5 residents (#s 305, 306, 307 and 308) reviewed for nutritional supplements. This placed residents at risk for weight loss and inadequate nutrition. Findings include:1. Resident 306 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and malnutrition.A physician order from 6/27/25 included 120 ml of Medpass 2.0, a nutritional supplement, to be provided to Resident 306 three times a day between meals.Review of the 10/2025 MAR revealed 9, which indicated the medication was unavailable, was entered on 10/12/25, 10/13/25, 10/14/25, 10/15/25, 10/20/25, 10/21/25, 10/22/25, 10/24/25, 10/25/25, 10/26/25 and 10/27/25 for Medpass 2.0. On 10/30/25 at 9:40 AM Staff 23 (Dietary Manager) stated she was responsible for ordering Medpass 2.0 and confirmed there was a delay in administrative approval for the order she submitted on 10/24/25. Staff 23 stated the order she submitted on 10/24/25 had not been approved by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents (#303) reviewed for ADLs and transfers. This placed residents at risk for pain and discomfort related to delayed care. Findings include:Resident 303 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including breast cancer and congestive heart failure. A 9/23/25 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 303 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.Resident 303's 9/2025 care plan revealed she/he required two-person assistance for bed mobility and transfers and was incontinent of bowel and bladder.A grievance was submitted by Resident 303 on 9/28/25 regarding the delay in being assisted to bed on the evening of 9/27/25. The grievance indicated Resident 303 stated she/he preferred to go to bed around 5:00 PM but was not assisted until approximately 9:00 PM. The resident reported she/he was aware there was only one CNA working on her/his floor that evening and expressed this was a staffing failure and totally unsafe. Resident 303…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for discharges. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe discharge and potential rehospitalization. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on 4/2024, with diagnoses including fibular fracture.Resident 1's 4/15/24 Discharge Care Plan indicated the resident was anticipated to discharge home. Social Services was to arrange support services such as home health (HH) caregiver support, PT, and OT.A 6/12/24 Physician Note revealed the resident would benefit from HH, PT, and OT after discharge.A 6/12/24 Social Services Note revealed a referral was sent to a Home Health agency.A 6/14/24 Social Services Note revealed Resident 1 decided to remain at the facility and had paid for two weeks in advance.Resident 1's 6/19/24 Discharge Summary revealed the resident was discharged from the facility on 6/19/24 without a HH referral.On 9/5/25 at 1:57 PM, Staff 16 stated she did not recall what happened with the Home Health referral for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly dispose of expired medications for 3 of 3 medication storage rooms, 4 of 5 medication carts, and 1 of 3 medication storage refrigerators. This placed residents at risk for lack of medication efficacy and adverse reactions from expired medications. Findings include: The facility's Storage of Medications policy with revision date 11/2020 did not address vials of medications but indicated outdated medications were to be destroyed by the facility. The manufacturer insert indicated a multi-dose vial of Tuberculin should be dated when opened and thrown away after 30 days to avoid oxidation and degradation. During a review of the fourth-floor medication storage room on 3/11/25 at 3:24 PM, the following expired medication was found: - One box of nicotine transdermal 14mg patches with an expiration date of 2/2025. On 3/11/25 at 3:33 PM, Staff 27 acknowledged the transdermal patches were expired and not discarded. Staff 27 stated the expectation was for expired medications to be discarded.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination for 1 of 1 kitchen and 3 of 3 dining room refrigerator units and freezers reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness and unappetizing meals. Findings include: The facility's Preventing Foodborne Illness - Food Handling Policy dated 7/2014 revealed the following: - Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. The facility's Personal Food Storage dated 11/2024 revealed the following: - Food or beverage brought in from outside sources for storage in facility pantries, refrigeration units, or personal room refrigeration units will be monitored by designated staff for food safety. - Designated facility staff will be assigned to monitor individual room storage and refrigeration units for food or beverage disposal. 1. The following items were observed in the facility's main kitchen: On 3/10/25 at 9:22 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess residents for safe self-administration of medication for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 65 and 69) reviewed for self-administering medication. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe medication regimen. Findings include: 1. Resident 65 admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including kidney failure. Resident 65's 1/6/25 Quarterly MDS assessed her/him with a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 65's 3/11/25 Physician Orders included an order for Zinc Oxide External Paste 20 % which directed staff to apply to [genital area] topically two times a day for skin care, for three days and apply to affected areas topically as needed for skin care. An order for Hydrocortisone External Cream 2.5 % directed staff to apply to affected areas topically as needed for skin care, apply BID with Ketoconazole (antifungal medication) when skin folds were flared. On 3/11/25 at 9:27 AM, 12:34 PM, 3:30 PM and 3/12/25 at 8:49 AM, Resident 65 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently received transfer assistance for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#90) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of transfer assistance and isolation. Findings include: The facility's 3/2018 Activities of Daily Living Policy indicated appropriate care and services were to be provided to residents unable to carry out ADLs independently, including appropriate support and assistance with transfers. Resident 90 was admitted to the facility in 12/2024 with diagnoses including hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate) following a stroke. Resident 90's 12/25/24 admission MDS indicated the resident was rarely/never understood, severely impaired for decision making and dependent on assistance from staff for transfers. Resident 90's 2/20/25 Care Plan revealed the following: -A tilt-in-space…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support individual activity interests and preferences for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 72 and 90) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for isolation, lack of social interaction and engagement. Findings include: The facility's 2/2005 Activities Policy indicated the facility would provide an activities program that addressed the intellectual, social, spiritual, creative and physical needs, capabilities and interests of each resident. The activity program would promote each resident's self-respect by providing activities that supported self-expression and choice. 1. Resident 72 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including colon cancer and adjustment disorder with anxiety and depression. Resident 72's 11/22/24 Activity Profile revealed the following activity interests and preferences: -The resident preferred afternoon activities in her/his room or in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation for 1 of 1 residents (#357) reviewed for misappropriation. This placed residents at risk for lack of medication efficacy and loss of property. Findings include: Resident 357 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including hip fracture and lung disease. A 9/20/24 physician order instructed staff to administer Oxycodone (a pain reliever) one to two tablets every four hours as needed for pain. A 9/24/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 357 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact, and Resident 357 had frequent pain and received PRN pain medications. A review of Resident 357's clinical record revealed the following: -Discharge paperwork dated 10/9/24 indicated Resident 357 took home 56 Oxycodone tablets. -Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated Resident 357 took home all medications. -Narcotic logbook records dated 10/9/24 and 10/11/24 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report timely to the State Agency an incident of alleged misappropriation of medications for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#357) reviewed for misappropriation. This placed residents at risk for diversion of medications and misappropriation of property. Findings include: The facility's 9/2022 Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility that all suspected alleged, or actual cases of resident abuse, including injuries of unknown origin, shall be thoroughly and completely investigated and reported according to Federal and/or State regulations. -All covered individuals of the facility are mandatory reporters. It is the responsibility of the Administrator and Director of Nursing Services to ensure that these policies and procedures are followed. Resident 357 admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including hip fracture and lung disease. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide dignified and respectful care for 1 of 3 residents (# 101) reviewed for respect and dignity. This placed residents at risk of loss of dignity. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding dignity states the following: - Residents shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances her or his sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. - Residents were to be treated with dignity and respect at all times. Resident 101 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including depression and dementia. A 6/4/23 Care Plan included instructions to provide Resident 101 with brief changes due to incontinence. A 6/30/23 Alleged Abuse report included statements from Resident 101 regarding care and comments from Staff 3 (CNA) which included: -One morning I saw [Staff 3] standing there, yelling at me . why did you say those things about me? You want me to get fired? I didn't say anything to [Staff 3] because I was scared. I didn't know why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents had access to petty cash on an ongoing basis for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 17, 42 and 242). This placed residents at risk for lack of access to personal funds. Findings include: 1. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 17's 9/3/23 Annual MDS indicated she/he had no cognitive impairment. On 11/1/23 at 10:25 AM a sign was observed on the counter of the Business Office which indicated resident trust withdrawal hours were as follows: -Business Office, Monday thru Friday from 9:00 AM - 4:30 PM -Front Desk, Saturday 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM and Sunday 8:30 AM - 2:00 PM On 10/30/23 at 1:47 PM Resident 17 stated her/his daughter helped to manage her/his personal funds and the facility also held money for her/him. Resident 17 stated she/he tried to withdraw money from her/his facility-held funds last night but the teller wasn't there so I couldn't get my money. Resident 17 stated she/he can only access her/his money during business hours. On 11/1/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt environment. Findings include: Observations of the facility's general environment and residents' rooms from 10/31/23 through 11/6/23 identified the following issues: -Rooms 117, 375 and 378 had closet doors with veneer coverings that were torn, lifting and peeling. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had a brown water-stained ceiling tile outside the bathroom area and a large hole in the wall behind the resident's bed with exposed drywall and missing paint. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had a large chunk of window ledge that was missing with exposed wood and jagged edges. The countertop laminate was missing on the sink with sharp edges and exposed wood. -Hall 200 had two missing handrail endcaps, one near the elevator and the other near the dining room. -Hall 200 had an approximate 12 inch deep gouge on the lower wall near room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices with appeal rights were provided in writing to residents and their representatives and to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalizations for 3 of 3 residents (#s 19, 46 and 193) reviewed for hospitalizations. This placed residents at risk of inappropriate transfers, lack of access to an advocate to inform them of their options and rights and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including left leg fracture. A 10/12/23 Progress Note indicated Resident 19 was sent to the hospital. A 10/15/23 Progress Note indicated Resident 19 readmitted to the facility. No evidence was found in Resident 19's health record to indicate transfer notices with appeal rights were provided in writing to her/his and their representatives or the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of the resident's transfers to the hospital. On 11/2/23 at 4:28 PM Staff 33 (Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 19, 46 and 193) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities. Findings include: The facility's undated Bed-Hold Agreement for Oregon indicated the following: -When a resident was discharged to the hospital, the resident or their legal representative would be offered the option of holding the bed the resident currently occupied. At the time of the transfer from the facility to the hospital, the discharging nurse would give the resident or their legal representative a copy of this agreement. If possible, the agreement should be reviewed and completed at that time. -If the agreement was not completed by the time the resident was discharged from the hospital, Admissions Coordinator at the facility would contact the resident or their legal representative within 24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 4 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 7, 43, 53 and 54) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: On 10/31/23 a review of the facility staff training records for CNAs employed over one year revealed the following: -Staff 7 (CNA), hire date 9/24/2012; had no annual performance review documentation on file. -Staff 43 (CNA), hire date 4/18/2002; had no annual performance review documentation on file. -Staff 53 (CNA), hire date 7/9/2012; had no annual performance review documentation on file. -Staff 54 (CNA), hire date 9/30/2014; had no annual performance review documentation on file. On 11/2/23 at 11:23 AM Staff 19 (Human Resource Director) confirmed she was unable to provide annual performance review documentation for Staff 7, Staff 43, Staff 53 and Staff 54.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) were posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 1 of 1 facility. This placed residents at risk for incorrect staffing information. Findings include: Multiple observations from 10/30/23 through 11/3/23 between the hours of 7:30 AM and 9:30 PM revealed the facility had a skilled building with two floors and a separate building with three floors for long-term care residents. The DCSCRs were only observed in the skilled building, on the first floor unit. The postings were accessible to residents and visitors of the first floor unit only. No DCSCRs were observed in the long-term care building. On 10/30/23 at 3:01 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the DCSDRs were located in the skilled building on the first floor unit. On 11/3/23/ at 10:11 AM Staff 13 (Staffing Coordinator) confirmed there were no DCSCR postings in the long-term care building and the current posting location in the skilled building would not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals where secured and accessible only to authorized personnel for 1 of 1 facility observed for secure medication and treatment carts. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications and adverse medication consequences. Findings include: The facility's Storage of Medications Policy and Procedure dated 11/2020 stated: Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals were locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts were not left unattended. 1. On 10/30/23 at 10:12 AM the treatment cart on the second floor of the skilled care building was unlocked and unattended by staff. On 10/30/23 at 10:12 AM Staff 50 (LPN) confirmed the cart was left unlocked. 2. On 11/1/23 at 12:38 PM the treatment cart on the second floor of the skilled care building was unlocked and unattended by staff. On 11/1/23 at 12:38 PM Staff 50 (LPN) confirmed the cart was left unlocked. 3. On 10/31/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination for 1 of 1 kitchen and 3 of 3 dining room/snack refrigerators reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness and unappetizing meals. Findings include: The facility's 6/2020 Food Preparation and Handling policy states: -Food was to be covered and dated for storage. 1. On 10/30/23 at 9:17 AM the following items were observed in the facility's main kitchen: Walk-in refrigerator: -Three small uncovered bowls of applesauce were undated. -A covered dish of a smooth beige substance was undated. -A sandwich wrapped with cling film labeled, PBJ was undated. It was hard to the touch. -A small covered bowl of cottage cheese was undated. -Five small covered bowls of watermelon cubes labeled, 27. There was nothing on the label to indicate the date the bowls were placed in the refrigerator. -One small covered bowl of sliced strawberries with no label or date. -A chef salad…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse aides completed 12 hours of annual training for 3 of 5 sampled CNAs (#s 7, 52 and 53) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: On 11/2/23 at 2:11 PM Staff 19 (Human Resource Director) provided a list of the following CNA training hours: -Staff 7 (CNA): received 6 hours of annual training; -Staff 52 (CNA): received 4.25 hours of annual training and -Staff 53 (CNA): received 0 hours of annual training. On 11/2/23 at 2:11 PM Staff 19 (Human Resource Director) acknowledged the identified CNAs lacked 12 hours of required annual training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a consent was obtained prior to administering antipsychotic medications to residents for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#60) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed about their medications. Findings include: The facility's 8/2020 Psychoactive Medication Management Guideline Policy specified to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medication use. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure and major depressive disorder. Resident 60's 2/23/23 Physician Order indicated the resident was prescribed Abilify (antipsychotic) for major depressive disorder. Resident 60's 2/2023 and 3/2023 MARs revealed the resident received Abilify daily. Review of Resident 60's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the resident was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of Abilify. On 11/2/23 at 4:44 PM Staff 2 (DNS) reviewed Resident 60's health record, acknowledged there was no documentation to indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident needs and preferences related to lighting were accommodated for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#60) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for lack of access to lighting and an unhomelike environment. Findings include: Resident 60 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including heart failure. On 10/30/23 at 2:40 PM multiple plastic bags were observed tied together in a chain which extended from the cord of Resident 60's overbed light and wrapped around the resident's right assist bar of her/his bed. Resident 60 stated the cord of her/his overbed light was too short and she/he could not independently use the light without the extension the plastic bags provided. On 11/3/23 at 10:10 AM Staff 25 (Maintenance Director) stated he expected staff to report to him when a resident's overbed light cord was too short so he could replace it with a longer one. Staff 25 observed the plastic bags tied to the cord of Resident 60's overbed light and stated he was not aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were properly secured for 1 of 1 resident (# 342) reviewed for pain medications. This placed residents at risk for loss of property and drug diversion. Findings include: Resident 342 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including heart failure and chronic pain syndrome. Resident 342's 2/2/23 Care Plan indicated the resident used Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) for chronic pain due to arthritis in both knees. A Nursing Facility Reported Incident dated 3/28/23 indicated 10 pills of Oxycodone used to treat Resident 342 for pain were missing on 3/28/23. A medication reconciliation for Resident 342 was conducted on 3/28/23. Care staff and management were unable to locate the missing medication. On 11/1/23 at 3:07 PM Staff 4 (RN) stated Staff 5 (CMA) reported she left a bubble pack of Oxycodone pills at Resident 342's bedside and 10 pills were missing. Staff 4 stated Resident 342 was assessed and an incident report was started immediately. Staff 4 stated when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess residents for dialysis and cognition for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 6 and 39) reviewed for dialysis and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease. Resident 39's 5/3/20 Care Plan revealed the resident required dialysis three times a week. Resident 39's 7/31/23 Annual MDS indicated the resident did not receive dialysis. There was no urinary status/dialysis CAA completed. On 11/3/23 at 12:16 PM Staff 3 (RNCM) reported she was responsible for completing Resident 39's Annual MDS related to dialysis. She confirmed Resident 39 continued to receive dialysis and the 7/31/23 MDS was inaccurate. 2. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including depression. A review of Resident 6's 6/4/23 admission MDS indicated the resident was not assessed for cognition. An 8/4/23 Nursing Progress Note revealed Staff 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#57) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial needs and isolation. Findings include: The facility's 2/2005 Activities Policy revealed the facility was to encourage each resident to maintain normal leisure activity. The facility would provide an activities program that addressed the intellectual, social, spiritual, creative and physical needs, capabilities and interest of each resident. The activity program would promote each resident's self-respect by providing activities that supported self-expression and choice. Resident 57 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including anxiety, major depressive disorder and insomnia. Resident 57's 12/31/22 Annual MDS revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. Her/his activity preferences indicated it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment for non-pressure skin impairment for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#192) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for infection and delayed healing. Findings include: Resident 192 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including neck fracture. Resident 192's 2/2023 TAR revealed no treatment or orders for skin breakdown on the resident's buttocks and thighs. A Progress Note dated [DATE] revealed the resident was sent to the hospital for altered mental status. A Hospital Wound, Ostomy Service Department Progress Note dated [DATE] revealed Resident 192's buttocks were red with excoriation (raw irritated skin) in the gluteal cleft (the groove between the buttocks) and a rash. The resident's right upper rear thigh had moisture associated skin deterioration, a fungal rash and excoriated skin. The resident's buttocks and perineal (area between the genitals and anus) skin were red and a rash was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received restorative services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#17) reviewed for therapy services. This placed residents at risk for decreased ROM and mobility. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including stroke. An 8/9/22 Therapy Referral Form indicated Resident 17's Restorative Nursing Plan included active ROM exercises three times per week. Resident 17's 9/3/23 Annual MDS indicated she/he had no cognitive impairment and required extensive physical assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. A review of Resident 17's Care Plan revealed her/his Restorative Nursing Plan was revised on 9/14/23 to include the following goals: -gait distance and safety -independence and safety with transfers On 10/30/23 at 2:12 PM Resident 17 was observed to sit in a wheelchair and hold her/his right arm on the arm rest using her/his left hand. Resident 17 stated she/he last had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for adverse respiratory outcomes and discomfort. Findings include: The facility's 10/2010 Oxygen Administration Policy indicated the following: -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. -Unless otherwise ordered, start the flow of oxygen at the rate of two to three liters per minute. Resident 42 was readmitted to the facility in 8/2019 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the blood) and hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in body tissues). Resident 42's 8/19/23 Annual MDS revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment, experienced shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion and shortness of breath or trouble breathing when lying flat. Resident 42's 10/2023 Physician Orders directed the resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate provisions for dialysis care were implemented and to ensure post-dialysis communication with the dialysis center was received for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#39) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment. Findings include: The facility's 11/2020 Care of the Dialysis Resident Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -Emergency procedures and other pertinent information was documented on the resident's care plan. -Nursing staff were to send a dialysis communication form to the dialysis center and the dialysis center completed a designated portion of the form each time a resident was scheduled for dialysis. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease. a. Resident 39's 8/26/22 Care Plan indicated the resident received dialysis three times per week, the resident had a left upper extremity AV fistula (a connection for dialysis access), the dialysis Emergency Procedure Instructions and an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 resident (#40) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization, unidentified triggers and unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including depression. Resident 40's 9/27/22 cognitive assessment indicated no cognitive impairment. On 12/6/22 Resident 40 experienced physical abuse from a staff member which resulted in increased stress and triggered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for the resident. Review of Resident 40's records revealed an assessment for trauma-informed care was not performed consistent with Resident 40's mental health needs. On 11/6/23 at 11:10 AM Staff 33 (Social Service Director) confirmed a trauma assessment was not completed for Resident 40 to identify potential triggers of PTSD.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were addressed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for increased depression. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including depression. An 8/4/23 Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) revealed Resident 6 received Cymbalta 30 mg daily (antidepressant) and lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily (proton pump inhibitor). It was recommended to increase Cymbalta to 60 mg and consider discontinuation of lansoprazole 30 mg if needed. On 9/5/23 the pharmacist made a repeat recommendation to increase Cymbalta to 60 mg and consider discontinuation of lansoprazole 30 mg if needed. A review of Resident 6's health record revealed no documentation to indicate the 8/4/23 or 9/5/23 pharmacy recommendations were acted upon. On 11/6/23 at 1:28 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed she was unable to provide documentation in response to pharmacy recommendations dated 8/4/23 or 9/5/23.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medication error rates of five percent or greater for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 494 and 495) reviewed for medication administration. The facility's medication administration error rate was 6.7 percent. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: 1. Resident 494 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including arthritis. On 11/1/23 at 12:31 PM Staff 38 (CMA) administered Tylenol 650 mg oral tablets to Resident 494. Resident 494's 11/2023 MAR revealed the resident had a physician order for Tylenol 650 mg rectal suppository PRN. The resident did not have an order for Tylenol 650 mg oral tablets PRN. On 11/1/23 at 12:31 PM Staff 38 verified Resident 494's PRN Tylenol order was for rectal suppository not oral tablets. 2. Resident 495 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including chronic pain. On 11/3/23 at 9:27 AM Staff 39 (CMA) applied two lidocaine 5% patches to Resident 8's back. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters and garbage storage areas were maintained in a sanitary condition for 1 of 1 garbage area reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This placed residents at risk for potential exposure to pathogens related to the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings include: On 11/2/23 at 9:06 AM the following was observed in and around the garbage area used by kitchen and care staff: -The garbage area contained three large metal dumpsters. -One dumpster was uncovered and contained bagged and unbagged food debris and food packaging, bagged and unbagged care items including used briefs, resident care gloves, procedure masks, N-95 masks and face shields. -Food debris was scattered on the ground around and under the dumpsters. -Food packaging was scattered on the ground around the dumpsters. -Used resident care gloves and procedure masks were on the ground near the dumpsters. -A squirrel was observed eating a piece of food near the dumpsters. Outside of the garbage area, a large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow disinfection practices to prevent COVID-19 or other infections for 2 of 4 halls and 1 of 1 laundry room. This placed residents at risk for infections. Findings include: The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) approved list of COVID-19 disinfectants revealed Lonza Disinfectant Wipes Plus 2 was effective against COVID-19 with a wet contact time of four minutes and Ecolab Peroxide Multi Surface Cleaner and Disinfectant was effective against COVID-19 with a wet contact time of 30 seconds. On 10/20/22 at 9:58 AM Staff 21 (Housekeeper) was asked to demonstrated the use of Ecolab Peroxide Multi Surface Cleaner and Disinfectant on surfaces. Staff 21 sprayed the peroxide cleaning product on the front of the washing machine and immediately dried the surface with a towel. Staff 21 also verbally described the process she used to clean and sanitize dirty linen bins and surfaces with the peroxide cleaning product with Staff 23 (Housekeeping Manager) present and the cleaning process did not include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly assess residents after a fall for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#27) reviewed for accidents. This placed resident at risk for falls. Findings include: Resident 27 admitted to the facility in 8/10/2022 with diagnoses including lung and brain cancer. A review of the 8/22 admission MDS revealed Resident 27 had a BIM score of 14 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 27 reported no pain. An Incident Report from the 10/9/22 fall was provided to the surveyor. A 10/13/22 Incident Report revealed the investigation did not address Resident 27's condition after the fall. Resident 27 refused scheduled Morphine from 10/1/22 - 10/3/22. Scheduled Morphine was discontinued on 10/3/22. No pain medications were administered from 10/1/22 - 10/8/22. From 10/9/22 through 10/11/22 and 10/13/22 through 10/16/22 Resident 27 received PRN pain medication daily for pain rated 3 to 10 out of 10 on the pain scale. On 10/17/22 at 12:07 PM and on 10/19/22 at 9:47 AM Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review in was determined the facility failed to provide ordered treatment to prevent pressure ulcers from developing and to promote healing of pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 11, 38) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at increased risk for worsening skin condition. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including dementia and diabetes. A 10/8/22 physician order revealed Resident 11's heels were to be floated. On 10/17/22 at 12:22 PM Resident 11 was observed lying in bed without her/his heels floated. A sign above resident's head indicated to float heels and the heels. On 10/18/22 at 9:29 AM Resident 11 was observed lying in bed without her/his heels floated. On 10/19/22 at 11:38 AM Resident 11 was lying in bed without her/his heels floated. At 11:39 AM Staff 26 (LPN) confirmed Resident 11's heels were not floated. Staff 26 stated Resident 11's heels needed to be floated because they were boggy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident wheelchairs were in safe working order for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#60) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injuries. Findings include: Resident 60 was admitted to the facility in 12/2021 with diagnoses including diabetes and surgical amputation. The 9/20/22 Annual MDS indicated Resident 60 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. A Care Plan dated 10/6/22 indicated Resident 60 used an electric wheelchair for mobility. Observations from 10/18/22 through 10/20/22 on day and evening shifts revealed Resident 60's wheelchair did not have an arm rest on the left side of her/his wheelchair and the arm rest on the right side had no cushion; just a metal frame. The frame was wrapped in plastic tape and had zip ties to keep the metal pieces together and the metal pieces had sharp edges. The control stick was a metal lever with nothing covering it for protection from injuries. Resident 60 slept in her/his wheelchair but could not lay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen usage for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#60) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Resident 60 was admitted to the facility in 12/2021 with diagnoses including diabetes and surgical amputation. The Annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident utilized oxygen. On 10/18/22 at 10:24 AM Resident 60 was observed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula (device used to deliver oxygen) connected to an oxygen concentrator (filters and generates medical grade oxygen). Resident 60 stated she/he always wore oxygen to help with shortness of breath. On 10/20/22 at 3:58 PM Staff 5 (LPN) acknowledged Resident 60 did not have an order for oxygen and should not have it on without an order.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review in was determined the facility failed to treat pain for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#70) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at increased risk for unmanaged pain. Findings include: Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in 6/2021 with diagnoses including dementia, stroke, and hemiparesis (inability to move) of left side of body. The 10/19/22 Skin and Wound Evaluations revealed Resident 70 had three deep pressure injuries (skin is non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple), three unstageable pressure ulcers due to eschar/slough (cannot be confirmed because it is covered by dead tissue), one Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone) and two unstageable [NAME] Terminal ulcers. A 10/5/22 physician order indicated to premedicate Resident 70 every day shift with Morphine prior to all wound care due to pain from wound care. A review of the 10/2022 MAR and Narcotic Sign Out Log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. There were 26 medication administration opportunities with eight errors resulting in an error rate of 30.77%. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and feeding tube placement. The facility's Administering Medication through an Enteral Tube Policy and Procedure dated 11/2018 indicated staff were to crush medications, administer each separately, dilute medications and flush the feeding tube between medications with room temperature or warm purified water. Physician orders dated 9/9/22 indicated: -If administering multiple medications per scheduled dose provide five to 10 mls of warm water between medications. An observation of Staff 7 (LPN) on 10/20/22 at 8:50 AM revealed the following medications administered incorrectly: -Clopidogrel Bisulfate (blood thinner) Oral Tablet 75 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$33,319 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $33,319 — penalty dated 2023-11-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.0+2.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Glenville Health & RehabGlenville, WV 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Highland Ridge Rehab CenterDublin, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5Mountain View Care CenterRipley, WV 1 of 5New Martinsville Health & RehabNew Martinsville, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Winchester Health & RehabilitationWinchester, VA 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Lynn Care CenterFront Royal, VA 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Tygart Valley Health & RehabilitationBelington, WV 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Blue Ridge Therapy ConnectionStuart, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OREGON HEALTHCARE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 07/01/2025
LAURELHURST OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2025
DELILAH 2626 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
JML 1836 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
JNL 2024 FAM TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
LANSILH IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
MJL 2024 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
OEB 94 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2025
IDELS, SHIMONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
MISILI, LEUMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
POIRIER, TRACIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
TATIRIQ IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
LION 26 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
SABRINA 1818 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
SAESSY IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$24.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 34%Medicare 2%Other / private 64%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$383per resident / day
operating cost
$11,651per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$382per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385010. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next