No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

New Martinsville Health & Rehab

225 Russell Avenue, New Martinsville, WV 26155 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (304) 455-2600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$49,442 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $49,442 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-18)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
45325 State Route 78 · (740) 472-1879 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid<0.1 mi
1021 3rd St · (304) 455-1790 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Witscheys0.9 mi
155 North St · (304) 398-5398 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
255 Russell Ave · (304) 455-3453

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.7%14.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.9%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms67.4%7.6%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%4.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.2%15.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.1%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.9%13.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%1.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.5%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.6%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.4%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.411.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.731.841.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.3%CMS range 30.2–50.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.6–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.9%CMS range 5.9–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
45.7%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 95.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
27
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse. The state agency determined the failure to address verbal threats from Resident #61 placed all residents in the facility in an immediate jeopardy situation. The residents making the threats could physically harm other residents. Psychological harm, such as fear and anxiety. could occur for other residents who were threatened by the residents or overheard the threats. Residents with post-traumatic stress disorder could be triggered. Resident identifier: #61. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #61 On 06/05/24 at 09:15 AM during a review of Resident #61's medical record it was noted Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia, Depression and Unspecified Dementia, Moderate with agitation. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility from an acute behavioral and mental health hospital. The hospital evaluation, dated 12/28/23, noted the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility record review, and staff interview the facility failed to follow Manufacturer's instructions regarding dishwasher temperature. Overall, commercial dishwasher temperature requirements are important to maintaining a safe and sanitary food service environment. This failed practice had the potential to affect every resident that gets their nutrition from the kitchen. This created an immediate jeopardy situation. Facility Census: 86. Findings included: a) Dishwasher A review of facility records on 06/03/24, found the dish washer is washing at 110 degrees and the final rinse temperature is 110 degrees since April 21, 2024. Review of operating manual reveals the wash cycle requires minimum 120 Degrees recommended 140 degrees and the rinse cycle requires minimum 120 degrees and recommend 140. On 6/03/24 at 10:50 AM an Observation of Dishwasher wash and rinse cycle found the dishwasher temperature only registered at 100 degrees. The Maintenance director confirmed it was not running at the recommended temperature. He stated that he has been aware of the issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-11 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is diagnosed with a mental disorder receives appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Failure to provide one (1) of one (1) residents with essential menal health services and treatemnt created an immediate jeopardy sitauiton. Resident #61 did not receive the appropriate treatment and services for diagnoses paranoid schizophrenia, depression and unspecified dementia with moderate agitation. Resident #61 had documented violent behaviors that placed more than an limited number of residents at risk for serious harm. Resident identifier: #61. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #61 On 06/05/24 at 09:15 AM during a review of Resident #61's medical record it was noted Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia, Depression and Unspecified Dementia, Moderate with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident's received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, physician's orders were not followed. Resident #87. Facility census: 94.a) Resident #87A review of Resident #87's medical record revealed, a Physicians order for: --Check residual prior to each tube feed. If >200ml hold feed and re-check in 1 hour. If >500ml notify MD. every shift with order date 4/24/2024.--Check placement before med administration or feedingevery shift with order date 4/24/2024.An observation on 10/15/25 at 930 AM of Resident #87s tube feeding revealed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN) failed to check residual prior to this tube feed. During an interview 10/15/25 at 930 AM, LPN #1 stated that there was not an order to check residual prior to feeding. She continued to state that she tries to wait a little longer after breakfast so Resident #87 doesn't get to full. On 10/15/25 at 10:02 AM, the findings were discussed with the Administrator. She verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to properly contain kitchen waste in garbage dumpsters in a safe and sanitary manner. Facility Census: 93.Findings Included:On 08/20/25 at 10:15 AM, facility dumpsters were observed overflowing, lids would not close on any dumpster, soiled gloves, bags and miscellaneous trash were around all sides of the dumpster. On 08/20/25 at 10:21 AM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the dumpsters were overflowing, lids would not close and miscellaneous trash was around dumpsters. The Administrator stated, I'll call them they will make a special trip .they usually come on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays.Document titled Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal was reviewed and revealed the following: Policy: Food-related garbage and refuse are disposed of in accordance with current state laws. Specific Procedures/Guidance under #7 stated Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and observation the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for residents. This is true for residents #58, #79, #87, and #40. Facility Census 93.Findings Included:a) Resident #58 Interview with Resident # 58 on 08/20/2025 at 2:38 PM who reported a black area on the tile on and around the base of the wall behind resident’s toilet. Observed area around resident's toilet at 2:41 PM and Nurse Aide (NA) #35 acknowledged the area and agreed to notify housekeeping/maintenance. b) Resident #79 On 08/20/2025 at 10:47 AM during an interview with Resident #79, he stated pieces of dry wall had been removed from the bathroom wall around the pipes to the toilet for approximately one month. The toilet is now working but he did not have access to his toilet for two weeks, he had to use the toilet at the nurse’s station. c) Resident #87 Observed on 08/20/2025 10:53 AM a large hole in ceiling exposing unfinished wood underneath. d) Resident #40 On 08/20/25 at 1:20 PM observed Resident's toilet lid sitting on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the kitchen failed to store food in accordance to professional standards for food safety. Facility census: 93.Findings Included: a) During initial kitchen walk through on 08/20/25 the following items we found in the walk-in refrigerator: six (6) quarts of cranberry juice with a use by date of 08/08/25 five (5) Fruit Punch pitcher use by date of 08/18/25 three (3) grape drinks use by 08/15/25 four (4) sugar free drink use by 08/18/25 Unsweet tea use by 08/18/25 Interview with Kitchen Manager at 7:50 AM who acknowledged the drinks found in the walk-in refrigerator. Review of document titled, Receiving and Storage of Food, Policy: Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Specific Procedures/Guidance, Number eight (8) states the following: All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (used by date). Dry food storage during initial walk through: - 6.63 lb. Sysco Classic Spaghetti Sauce dented During an interview with Kitchen Manager (KM) at 7:50 AM the KM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify Resident #97's legal representative when he passed away in the facility and notify the resident representative of a new medication. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #97 and #76. Facility census: 93.Findings included: a) Resident #97 On [DATE] at 8:55 AM, an electronic record review revealed: Resident #97’s legal representative’s home telephone number Resident #97’s legal representative’s mobile phone number A Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form dated [DATE] The POST form listed the legal representative’s mobile phone number A Care Conference note, dated [DATE] at 10:00 AM, indicated Resident #97’s legal representative participated in the meeting A Nursing Note, dated [DATE] 2:40 PM, which indicated the nurse had made Resident #97’s legal representative aware of a new skin issue A Nursing Note, dated [DATE] at 8:57 PM, indicated the legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a Pre-admission Screening (PAS) which included all psychiatric diagnoses for Resident #10. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #10. Facility Census: 93. Findings Include: Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a Pre-admission Screening (PAS) which included all psychiatric diagnoses for Resident #10. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #10. Facility Census: 93. Findings Include: a) Resident #10 On 08/25/25 at 2:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #10. The review found the PAS dated 07/01/24 did not include the diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder was added during the stay at the facility on 06/16/23. On 08/25/25 at 2:58 PM, the Social Service Worker #22 confirmed the diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder was not on the PAS dated 07/01/24. The Social Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete medical record for Resident #5. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: #5. Facility Census: 93.On 08/25/25 at 2:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #5. The review found a physician's order for Lamictal 200mg (milligram) one (1) tablet by mouth at bedtime for seizures. A review of the resident's diagnoses did not find the diagnosis of seizures.On 08/25/25 at 3:30 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 confirmed the resident did not have seizures and the correct diagnosis should be mood disorder. On 08/25/25 at 3:45 PM, the MDS LPN #13 stated, We will get this corrected.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to readily available PPE. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) On 06/03/24 at 6:55 AM, a tour of the facility was performed. During that tour, it was noted that 3 (three) of the 4 (four) resident hallways had multiple residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and that no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was readily available to facility staff. The observations made were as follows: On 06/03/24 at 6:55 AM, a tour of A Hall was performed. No PPE was readily available on the hall and that multiple residents were in EBP. At this time, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 who stated, I don't know where it is, it was on the hall last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    b) Resident #60 On 6/03/24 at 12:00 AM, an observation of the facility dining area was performed. During this observation, Resident #60 was noted to be seated at a table wearing a facility gown that was not tied at the neck or waist. The front of the gown was exposing Resident #60's upper chest, shoulders and the right side of Resident #60's back. It was noted that several facility staff walked by Resident #60 without offering to adjust or tie Resident #60's gown to cover Resident #60's exposed body areas. On 06/03/24 at 12:12 PM, a staff interview was conducted with Employee #96. During this interview, Employee #96 acknowledged that Resident #60's gown should be tied and that Resident #60's upper chest, shoulders and back of Resident #60's body should not be exposed. Employee #96 then went and tied Resident #60's gown. Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide residents with a dignified dining experience. The dining room staff failed to serve the residents in a respectful manner, by not placing the food in front of the residents and removing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' food preferences and choices were honored. This failed policy had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #17, #14, and #9. Facility Census 86. Findings included: a) Resident #17 Based on an interview, on 06/03/24, with Resident #17 at 10:13 AM, it was revealed that she was unable to order an alternate item, if the food served to them was not to their liking. She mentioned this was due to the facility policy governing the ordering of alternate food items. The policy stated that orders for any alternate items were to be placed 2 (two) hours before mealtimes. This policy prevented residents from being able to exercise their right to a choice of food during mealtimes. Further, the resident stated that she was provided with a weekly menu which required her to review that day's menu, at least two (2) hours before mealtimes, to ensure that she could order an alternate if she needed to. The resident further stated that she was occupied during the morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to identify verbal complaints/concerns as a grievance. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Findings include: a) On 06/04/24 10:00 AM, review of Resident Council Minutes for the last six (6) months indicated that the resident council voiced concerns about call lights not being answered in a timely manner every month from 12/2023 to 5/2024. On 06/04/24 10:35 AM, During resident council meeting, Resident #31 reported that staff did not answer call lights in a timely manner and that the council has discussed these issues monthly during resident council meetings. On 06/05/24 12:38 PM, during an interview with the administrator regarding call light concerns, the administrator reported the facility was aware of complaints being made in resident council meeting about call lights being answered in a timely manner. She reported that as a result, random Call Light Audits were being performed by nursing staff since 01/21/24 and reported that no issues had been found at this time. She stated that no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report allegations of verbal abuse, neglect, and possible crime to all required stated agencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect three (3) of 11 residents reviewed for the care area of abuse. Resident identifiers: #79, #29, and #86. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #79 On 05/24/24, the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC) received a complaint from an employee from a state agency reporting that marijuana, a baggy of pills, and drug paraphernalia had been removed from a resident's room by a police officer. The facility provided a log of facility reported incidences (FRIs) that had been reported to OHFLAC. The log contained no record of a FRI regarding illegal substances found in a resident's room. On 06/10/24 at 11:45 AM, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) was asked about illegal substances being found in a resident's room. He stated neither he nor the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected a pre-admission mental health diagnosis for three (3) of six (6) residents reviewed for the category of PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review). The lack of pre-screening resulted in the residents' conditions not being evaluated through the Level II PASARR process. Resident identifier: #79, #61, and #58. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #79 A record review, completed on 06/03/24 at 11:07 AM, found the following details: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a bipolar disorder diagnosis. There was a Pre-admission Screen (PAS) dated 04/02/24 that was completed by the referring hospital. This PAS failed to include Resident #79's bipolar diagnosis under Section III, Question #30. During an interview on 06/05/24 at 11:17 AM, the Social Worker confirmed Resident #79 had a bipolar diagnosis upon admission, the admission PAS did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his or her preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was true for five (5) of 26 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #82, #190, #191, #54, and #61. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #82 A record review, completed on [DATE] at 3:00 PM, revealed Resident #82 was a male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In Resident #82's care plan the activities department expressed the following goal, I will participate in independent leisure activities of choice daily including word search, cross words, music, tv, sports, going outside through the review date, An intervention listed for this goal was, All staff to converse with her while providing care. The date this intervention was initiated was [DATE]. The care plan had a revision date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided to dependent residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of activities of daily living. Resident identifier: #29. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #29 On 06/03/24 at 1:06 PM, Resident #29 stated she had not been receiving twice weekly showers. Review of Resident #29's comprehensive care plan showed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required assistance of one (1) for bathing. Review of the facility's shower schedule showed Resident #29 was scheduled to receive showers on Tuesday and Sundays. Review of Resident #29's shower documentation for the past 30 days showed the resident received showers on 05/21/24, 05/23/24, and 05/25/24. No shower refusals were documented. On 06/04/24 at 3:56 PM, Regional Director of Clinical Operations confirmed Resident #29 had not received twice weekly showers. No further information was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. This was true for 3 (three) of 11 residents reviewed for the Long-Term Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #39, #41, #191. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #39 On 06/04/24 at 09:57 AM a review of Resident #39's medical record was performed. At this time, it was revealed that Resident #39 had a history of frequent falls. Upon further review of Resident #39's medical record, it was noted that Resident #39 had fallen 6 (six) times since January 2024. On 06/10/24 at approximately 10:30 AM, a further review of Resident #39's medical record was performed. Review of Resident #39's care plan noted an intervention that stated, medication per orders for Parkinson's. At this time, it was noted that Resident #39 had a Pharmacist Consultation Report dated 06/30/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that a resident received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice in regard to monitoring pain levels. This was true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for pain during a revisit survey. Resident Identifier: #69 and #80. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #69. Medical record review revealed Resident #69's Physician orders for pain management: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen tablet 7.5-325 MG, give one (1) tablet every four (4) hours as needed for pain use for pain scale 4-10. Order date 04/24/24 with a discontinue date 04/26/24. A continued review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed: --04/26/24 at 9:42 AM pain level 1 - Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen tablet given. Physician Order: Acetaminophen tablet, give 650mg every 6 hours as needed for general discomfort. Give for pain scale 1-3. Order date 04/23/24 with a discontinue date 04/26/24. No Acetaminophen tablet, administered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to store garbage and refuse in a proper manner. The dumpster area was polluted with uncovered garbage and medical supplies. This had the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility census: 88. Findings included: a) Dumpster area An observation on 06/10/24 found the dumpster lid open, a trashcan full of trash without a lid and the area was polluted with garbage and medical supplies. On 06/10/24 at about 2:10 PM during an Interview the Maintenance Assistant verified the dumpster lids should be closed. He stated the garbage should not be on the ground. He also stated that he needed help getting the trash can, full of trash over the top of the dumpster. When asked how long it had been sitting there, he replied, I think just today.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for residents. The facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for two (2) of 26 sampled residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey process. The facility failed to ensure Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were legally valid and matched other physician orders. Resident identifiers: #79, #54, and #3. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #79 A record review, on [DATE] at 11:07 AM, revealed a POST form in Resident #79's electronic medical record. The POST form was not dated by Resident #79. The directions for completing the POST form, compiled by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End of Life, state, The patient or incapacitated patient's MPOA (Medical Power of Attorney) representative or health care surrogate must sign and date this section for the form to be legally valid. A review of the original POST form kept at the nurses' station revealed it also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures which addressed establishing priorities for performance improvement activities that focused on resident safety, quality of care, and high-volume and/or problem-prone areas. This had the potential to affect an unlimited number of residents. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Facility Reported Incidents Review of the eight (8) complaints being investigated concurrently along with the annual Long-Term Care Survey Process revealed that five (5) out of the eight (8) were facility reported incidents involving the allegation of staff verbally abusing residents. During an interview on 06/11/24 at 2:00 PM, the Regional Director of Operations #115 and the Regional Director of Corporate Operations #116 reported that to their knowledge the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee did not identify and/or address the pattern of verbal abuse allegations as an area for improvement. They asked the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Infection Preventionist to join…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in safe operating condition according to manufacturer's recommendations. This had the potential to affect all residents who get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 88. Finding included: a) On 06/10/24 at 11:48 AM an observation of the ice machine in the main dining room found the water drainpipe down in the sewer pipe. There was not a two-inch recommended air gap. Both the drainpipe and sewer pipe were covered with a black substance. On 06/10/24 At 11:50 AM the [NAME] Director of Dietary verified there was no gap between the drainpipe and the sewer pipe and there was at black substance present on both pipes.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to incorporate an effective pest control program. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 88. Findings included: a) Kitchen area On 6/03/24 at 10:45 AM during a kitchen inspection there were ants in the dish washing room. On 6/03/24 at 10:50 AM during an interview the Maintenance Director verified there were ants in the kitchen area. He stated, everyone has ants, I've had them in my kitchen for about a year. He stated that the facility does not have an exterminator spray for roaches or ants. He clarified that he would spray if insects were observed by the staff. He continued to say that the exterminator only puts bait in traps outside.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) on non-coverage liability notices in a timely fashion for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. This failure placed the resident at risk of not being informed of her appeal rights prior to the end of Medicare covered services. Resident identifier: #25. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #25 On 06/05/24 at 10:43 AM, a review regarding the beneficiary protection notification liability notice process revealed the following details: -Resident #25 remained in the facility after her Skilled Medicare ended. -Resident #25's last covered day of Part A service was 01/11/24. -A NOMNC was issued on 01/15/24 (four days AFTER skilled coverage ended) and signed by resident's representative on 01/17/24. -A SNF ABN was issued on 01/15/24 (four days AFTER skilled coveraged ended) and signed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies for reporting neglect. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of 11 residents reviewed for the care area of abuse. Resident identifier: #29. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #29 The facility's policy and procedure titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting with original date 10/01/21 and no revision date stated all alleged violations involving neglect would be reported to the stated licensing/certification agency responsible to for surveying/licensing the facility, the local/state ombudsman, and also Adult Protective Services, if applicable to state law. During an interview on 06/03/24 at 1:39 PM, Resident #29 stated she had been left outside alone in the courtyard four (4) times following smoke breaks. Resident #29 stated she is unable to propel her wheelchair independently due to tremors and was unable to reenter the facility on her own. Resident #29 further stated there was no way to notify staff that she was outside and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b) Resident #29 During an interview on 06/03/24 at 1:39 PM, Resident #29 stated she had been left outside alone in the courtyard four (4) times following smoke breaks. Resident #29 stated she is unable to propel her wheelchair independently due to tremors and was unable to reenter the facility on her own. Resident #29 further stated there was no way to notify staff that she was outside and wanted to come in. The resident stated she was left out in the hot sun for two (2) hours on one day. Resident #29 also stated she had a history of falling from her wheelchair. Review of facility grievance forms showed a grievance on 05/13/24 which stated, Resident went outside with staff assistance for 1 pm smoke break. At end of smoke break as everyone returned inside [Nursing Assistant (NA) #5] said to this patient, If you can't bring yourself outside or inside, you shouldn't be able to smoke. [NA #5] then entered the building leaving this resident out in the courtyard unattended. Another resident [Resident #79] noted this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Notice of Transfer for an acute hospital transfer/discharge and failed to notify the long-term care Ombudsman of the transfer. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed under the hospitalization pathway in the annual Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #191,and #39. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Resident #191 A record review, completed on 06/10/24 at 2:24 PM, revealed that Resident #191 had been transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence in the electronic medical record that the facility had provided Resident #191 or his representative with a written Notice of Transfer/Discharge form nor was there evidence the facility had notified the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of resident's transfer to the hospital. During an interview, on 06/11 /24 at 11:20 AM, the Medical Records Director reported the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b) Resident #34 Medical Record review on 06/10/24 revealed resident #34 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Subsequent review of Resident #34's medical record showed it did not contain documentation that the Notice of Transfer or Discharge was provided to the Resident Representative, or the Ombudsman was notified of the discharges on 06/02/24. On 06/11/24 at 9:50 AM during an interview the Social Worker verified, there was no evidence that the Notice of Transfer or Discharge was completed and provided to the Resident's Representative for the discharges on 06/02/24. The Social Worker also confirmed the Ombudsman was not notified of the discharges on 06/02/24. Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Bed Hold notice for an acute hospital transfer. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed under the hospitalization pathway in the annual Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the PASARR for Resident #3, after the resident was diagnosed with a major mental disorder after admission to the facility. This was true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for PASARRs during the survey process. Resident Identifier: 3. Facility census: 86. Findings include: A) Resident #3 On 06/10/24, a record review was conducted for Resident #3. During record review, it was noted Resident #3 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 02/25/21, Resident #3 was diagnosed with major depressive disorder and on 10/13/23 was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Resident #3 had a new PASARR submitted on 11/27/2023, which did not include the new diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder or bipolar disorder. At approximately 10:04 AM on 06/11/24, an interview was conducted with the social worker concerning the PASARR for Resident #3, she confirmed the absence of major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder on the PASARR.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered by the physician to meet the needs of its residents. This was true for one (1) of 1 resident reviewed for the Long-Term Survey Process. Resident identifier: #41. Facility census: 86. a) Resident #41 On 06/04/24 at 01:00 PM, a review of Resident #41's medical record was performed. During the review of the physician's orders, it was noted that Resident #41 had orders as follows: * Novolog Injection Solution (Insulin Aspart) Inject as per sliding scale: if 201- 250 = 4; 251- 300 = 6; 301- 350 = 8; 351- 400 = 10; 401- 450 = 12; 451 + = 15. Notify Medical Doctor (MD) if blood sugar (BS) is less than 60 or above 450, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for Diabetes Mellitus (DM) II. Order date: 01/29/24 * Complete Blood Count (CBC)/Glycated hemoglobin (HgbA 1c) every 6 (six) months. Order date: 08/09/23. Upon further review of the medical record, this Surveyor was unable to locate the most recent results of the CBC and HgbA 1c. On 06/04.24 at 02:06 PM, an interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment. The ceiling in room B6 was damaged. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Room B6 On 06/03/24 at 12:55 PM, Resident #29 asked the surveyor to look at the ceiling in her room. Several brown spots were immediately over the resident's bed. The largest was the size of a plate. In the corner of the room, near but not directly over the resident's bed, contents appearing to be drywall were extruding from a plate-sized hole in the ceiling. On 06/04/24 at 3:33 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor stated the damage in the ceiling of Room #B6 was water damage. He stated the areas would be repaired.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directive paperwork was part of Resident #11's medical record. This was a random opportunity for discovery in the complaint process. Resident identifier: #11. Facility census: 78. Findings include: a) Resident #11 An electronic medical record review, completed on 03/18/24 at 1:25 PM, identified there was a Physician Determination of Capacity, dated 09/11/23, indicating Resident #11 lacked capacity to make her own medical decisions. There was no Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA), or Health Care Surrogate (HCS) form scanned in the electronic medical record. There was a Power of Attorney (POA) form, dated 11/23/21, on file. However, the POA failed to authorize the ability to make medical decisions on resident's behalf, it was mainly meant to be a financial power of attorney. During an interview on 03/20/24 at 9:55 AM, the Social Worker confirmed Resident #11 had never completed a Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) prior to losing capacity. The Social Worker then stated the facility did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with a well-balanced diet that met her daily nutritional and special dietary needs. The facility failed to offer a diverticulosis diet to Resident #11 who had an identified diagnosis of diverticulosis upon admission to the facility. This was a random opportunity for discovery in the complaint process. Resident identifier: #11. Facility census: 78. Findings include: a) Resident #11 A medical record review was completed for Resident #11 on 03/18/24 at 1:25 PM. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diverticulitis diagnosis as well as a diabetic diagnosis. Resident was placed on a carbohydrate-controlled diet. The Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) examined resident on 10/17/2023 and noted the following details, [AGE] year-old female being seen today related to pain/constipation. Patient has had past history of increased pain to left hip and side. X-rays were obtained and were negative for acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interviews as well as documentation review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. Residents complained of staff having poor attitudes and not treating them with respect. Facility census: 82. Findings included: a) On 08/28/23 between the hours of 9:45 a.m. - 10:15 a.m., reviewed residential council meeting minutes from May 2023, June 2023, July 2023, and August 2023. It was noted that every month the issue was discussed regarding staff attitudes. Facility census: 82. b) Resident #46 On 08/29/23 and 08/30/23, conducted an interview with Resident # 46. Resident #46 was asked if staff treated them with dignity and respect. Resident replied, Some of them are aholes. When I ring my call light, they will yell 'What do you want now?' On 08/31/23 at 9:34 AM during the exit conference the administrator and director of nursing had nothing to add to the issues regarding the staff's failure to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-14 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the designated individual acting as the Infection Preventionist completed a specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Census: 89 Findings included: a) Infection Preventionist A review of facility infection control documents, on 09/14/22, showed no evidence of any individual designated to serve as the infection preventionist who had completed a specialized training in infection prevention and control. An interview with the (Director of Nursing) DON, on 09/14/22 at 12:40 PM , revealed the facility had hired a new employee for that role, but the DON had been filling in as the Infection Preventionist. The DON stated neither staff member had a certificate of completion of a required Infection Preventionist course. The DON confirmed, at the present time, no staff members had obtained additional training and were certified as an Infection Preventionist.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals in a dignified manner. Residents seated at the same table did not receive meals simultaneously. This failed practice was observed as a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: Resident #37, #139, and #6. Census: 89 Findings included: a) Observation of the noon meal On 09/12/22 at 12:11 PM , a meal observation was made in the day area adjacent to the A/B nurses station where Resident #23, #37, #139 and #6 were observed sitting at the table. At this time, Resident #23 was eating and had finished most of the meal and had only fruit left on the tray. Residents' #37, #139 and #6 had not received any meal tray at this time. An interview, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #92, on 09/12/22 at 12:15 PM, revealed she was aware of the dignity issue of residents not being served meals at the same time when seated at the table and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a policy review, review of resident council minutes, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to consider the voiced concerns of residents in resident council. The facility failed to act promptly to investigate resident grievances concerning issues of call lights and staffing attitudes. This practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents living in the facility. Facility census: 89. Findings Included: A review of the facility policy titled Grievance/Concern with a revision date of 06/01/22 found the following. .Policy Center leadership will investigate, document and follow up on all concerns and grievances registered by any patient or patient representative a) Call lights The following Resident Council Meeting Minutes From 01/24/22 to 08/29/22 found the following documentation related to call lights concerns. --The Resident Council Minutes dated on 08/29/22, Our call lights being answered needs improvement. --The Resident Council Minutes dated on 07/25/22, Would like call lights to be answered more quickly. --The Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, resident council meeting and staff interview, the facility failed to provide residents with a safe clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility failed to eliminate the institutional practices by the overhead paging of frequent announcements. The facility also failed to provide residents with furniture in good repair and resident walls in good repair . This had a potential to affect an unlimited amount of residents living in the facility. Resident Identifiers: #16 and #119. Facility Census: 89. Findings Included: a) Overhead paging During an interview on 09/12/22 at 11:37 AM Resident #16 stated That thing goes off all the time, (the overhead paging made announcement). I have hearing problems, so I can only imagine how loud it is to the other patients that live here. During a Resident Council meeting held on 09/13/22 begin at 2:38 PM, the overhead paging system interrupted the meeting at 2:55 PM, the announcement was garbled and interrupted one of the residents who was speaking. The residents in attendance of the Resident Council…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident council meeting, and staff interviews the facility failed to make grievances forms accessible to residents to file a grievance anonymously. This practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents living in the facility. Facility census: 89 Findings Included: a) Grievance Forms Accessibility A review of the facility policy titled Grievance/Concern with a revision date of 06/01/22 found the following. .Process . 2.1 The right to file grievances orally (meaning spoken) or in writing, the right to file grievances anonymously; . During a Resident Council meeting held on 09/13/22 at 2:38 PM by two (2) state surveyors the following question was asked; Do you know how to file a Grievance? --I think there was forms in the dining room, but have not seen them in there. --I unaware there was a form --I was not aware a paper grievance form was an option. On 09/13/22 at 3:45 PM two (2) surveyor observations throughout the facility found no grievance forms for resident accessibility. During an interview on 09/13/22 at 3:50 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that resident centered care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was true for six (6) of ten (10) records reviewed for nutrition. Resident Identifiers: #30, #68, #2, #49, #78, #70. Facility Census: 89 Findings Included: a) Resident #30 On 9/14/22 at 11:30 AM record review shows the facility did not re-weigh resident #30 when he had a weight change of five (5) pounds (increase or decrease) from the last weight. According to staff interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/13/22 at 12:26 PM, staff is to re-weigh the Resident if there is a difference of a five (5) pound increase or decrease in the Residents weight. This was not performed on 3/10/22, 5/31/22, 6/20/22 and 7/06/22. This was confirmed with the DON 9/14/22 at 12:45 PM. The following weights were documented as of 9/14/22. 07/06/2022 13:25 118.6 Lbs 06/20/2022 13:56 109.4 Lbs 05/31/2022 16:15 122.4 Lbs 04/13/2022 10:17 106.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on anonymous resident interviews, anonymous staff interviews, resident council minutes, a resident council meeting held during the long-term care survey, and interviews with Administration, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promoted resident rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Facility census: 89. Findings Included: a) Anonymous Resident Interviews During an anonymous resident interview on 09/12/22 at 11:06 AM, Resident #301 stated the facility doesn't have enough staff. It would be the resident's preference to get up and be dressed earlier, but there simply isn't enough staff available to honor that preference. During an anonymous resident interview on 09/12/22 at 11:37 AM, Resident #302 stated I am going blind, and need more help, but there is not enough staff. I put my call light on and when they answer it, they turn it off and never come back. The say they don't have time. During an anonymous resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-14 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified nutrition professional on a full time basis to manage the daily function of the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all the residents that receive nutrition from the kitchen. Facility Census: 89. Findings Included: a) a) Qualified Nutrition Professional An observation of the kitchen office on 09/13/22 at 9:04 AM, revealed no certified licensed professional certificates. During an interview on 09/13/22 at 9:04 AM, Dietary Manager #34, stated I am enrolled in the Dietary Mangers class, I will be testing in February. During an interview on 09/13/22 at 9:04 AM interview District Manager of Dietary #112 stated, we do not have a full time certified dietary manager, I am here a few days a month and the dietician is here two (2) to three (3) days a week.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to keep kitchen equipment clean and rust free. The failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility's kitchen. Facility Census: 89. Findings Included: a) Ice Machine A review of the facility policy titled 4.0 Cleaning Standards with a revision date of 06/15/18 found the following. .Cleaning Procedure Ice Machine ( Bin type) When: Monthly On 09/12/22 at 9:50 AM a tour of the kitchen with Dietician #111, the ice machine in the main dining room revealed to have black substance in the inside of the machine. The Dietician #111 acknowledged the black substance. During an interview on 09/12/22 at 9:55 AM, [NAME] #101 stated the maintenance cleans the ice machine not the dietary department. I don't know the last time it was cleaned. During an interview on 09/12/22 at 10:05 AM the Maintenance Supervisor(MS) #86 stated we clean the ice machine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence the required Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) notice was issued in a timely fashion for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk of not being informed of their rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifier: #192. Facility census: 89. Findings included: a) Beneficiary Notice Review On 09/13/22 at 2:04 PM, a review was completed regarding the beneficiary protection notification liability notice given for the following resident who was discharged home following her last covered day of Medicare Part A services: -Resident #192's last covered day of Part A Services was on 06/12/22. -Resident #192 was issued the NOMNC on the next day, 06/13/22. This was also the day of Resident #192's discharge from the facility. The Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 state: The NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Notice of Transfer for an acute hospital transfer. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalizations/discharges during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #78. Facility census: 89. Findings included: a) Resident #78 An electronic medical record review was completed on 09/13/22 at 8:49 PM. Resident #78 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence a written Notice of Transfer/Discharge was provided to Resident #78 or her legal representative. During an interview on 09/14/22 at 2:13 PM, the Manager of Medical Records stated the facility was unable to locate evidence that a Notice of Transfer/Discharge was given.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Bed Hold Notice for a hospital transfer. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #78 and #80. Facility census: 89. Findings included: a) Resident #78 An electronic medical record review was completed on 09/13/22 at 8:49 PM. Resident #78 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence a written Bed Hold Notice was provided to Resident #78 or her legal representative. During an interview on 09/14/22 at 2:13 PM, the Manager of Medical Records stated the facility was unable to locate evidence that a written Bed Hold Notice was given. b) Resident #80 A medical record review on 09/12/22 at 1:54 PM, revealed Resident #80 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 09/13/22 at 11:20 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the bed hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for one (1) of 29 residents reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier: Resident # 69. Findings included: a) Resident #69 During the initial tour, on 09/12/22 at 10:30 AM, Resident #69 was observed to have both upper and lower dentures on the bedside table in a denture cup. At this time, Resident #69 stated she was needing some help with cleaning her dentures. A record review for Resident #69 showed an oral health assessment dated [DATE], that noted the resident to be edentulous (lacking teeth). Further review of the medical record, showed a care plan addressing Resident #69 as being at risk for dental care problems as evidenced by having own teeth. This care plan problem was developed on 12/22/22 and revised on 06/13/22 to note the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care to residents with pressure ulcers consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the LTCSP. Resident identifier: Resident #81. Findings included: a) Resident #81 A record review for Resident #81, showed the resident to have a pressure ulcer located on the sacrum which was present when the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the current person-centered care plan addressed the resident as being at risk for skin breakdown related to an unstageable pressure ulcer. An approach on the care plan reviewed, showed staff were required to complete a weekly skin check by a licensed nurse with weekly wound assessments of the wound status. A review of the current physician's orders showed no order for pressure ulcer treatment. Review of the weekly wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate assistive devices to Resident #56 in order for him to drink independently. This was a random opportunity of discovery. Resident Identifier: #56 Facility Census: 89 Findings included: a) Resident #56 On 9/13/22 at 12:25 PM, it was observed that Resident #56 did not have his nosey cup with his meal as ordered by the Physician. This was confirmed on 9/13/22 at 12:26 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse #89.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 26 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had a complete and accurate medical record. Resident #75 and #52 had Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms completed incorrectly per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). Resident identifiers: #75 and #52. Facility census: 89. Findings included: a) Resident # 75 [DATE] 12:52 PM, medical record review found: -A [NAME] Virginia POST form was completed and on file reflecting that resident was to receive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Full Treatment. Section E of the POST form entitled E. Signature: Patient or Patient Representative/Surrogate/Guardian was NOT signed but was dated for [DATE]. -The POST form was signed by the attending physician on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] 11:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee consisting, at a minimum, of the Director of Nursing (DON); the Medical Director or his/her designee; and at least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, a board member, or other individual in a leadership role. Facility census: 89. Findings included: a) Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee Meeting Attendance On 09/14/22 at 3:00 PM, a review of QAA Committee Meeting sign-in sheets from October 2021 - September 2022 was completed. There was no evidence that the Medical Director or his designee attended any QAA committee meetings in the months of October 2021, November 2021, and December 2021. During an interview on 09/14/22 at 3:39 PM, the Administrator acknowledged the Medical Director was not in attendance at any of the meetings in the October 2021 - December 2021 quarter. The Administrator stated she could not offer an explanation as to why that would have been the case [as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-06-11 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors on a daily basis. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 86. Findings included: a) Daily Nurse Staffing Posted Observation on 06/03/24 at 7:04 AM, found the daily nurse staffing posted was dated for Friday, 05/31/24. During an interview on 06/03/24 at 7:05 AM, the Medical Records Director confirmed the facility had failed to provide the correct postings for 06/01/24, 06/02/24, and 06/03/24.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$49,442 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $49,442 — penalty dated 2024-02-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Glenville Health & RehabGlenville, WV 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Highland Ridge Rehab CenterDublin, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5Mountain View Care CenterRipley, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Winchester Health & RehabilitationWinchester, VA 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Laurelhurst Post Acute & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Lynn Care CenterFront Royal, VA 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Tygart Valley Health & RehabilitationBelington, WV 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Blue Ridge Therapy ConnectionStuart, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WV GEN 2 SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/31/2023
CHIPPS, JENNIFERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/31/2023
STERLING, PHILLIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/31/2023

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$256K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 8%Other / private 8%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $256K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$438per resident / day
operating cost
$13,315per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$396per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515074. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next