Brookside Rehab & Nursing Center
614 Hastings Lane, Warrenton, VA 20186 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (540) 347-4770 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (80) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $146,073 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-08)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.6% | 14.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.1% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.2% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.1% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 57.0% | 94.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.2% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.7% | 14.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 11.1% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.3% | 11.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.27 | 1.48 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.3%CMS range 25.3–54.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.7–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 31.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 27.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.9–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 117.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
80 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain residents' highest level of well-being for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #44 and #51. The findings include: 1. For Resident #44 (R44), RN (registered nurse) #8 failed to assess and treat the resident in a timely manner. R44 sustained a fall during the day shift on 7/20/24. During the evening shift on 7/20/24, CNAs (certified nursing assistants) reported R44 was screaming in pain and RN #8 failed to assess the resident. On 7/21/24, R44 was screaming and could not be moved in the bed. X-rays were obtained, R44 was diagnosed with a left intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, and the resident was transferred to the hospital for surgical repair. A nurse's note dated 7/20/24 documented, Resident fell down on floor in dining room, hit her head with the wall but did not get any injury. This nurse checks [sic] her vitals and skin assessment. This nurse also notified to NP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and/or monitor a change in a resident's condition for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Residents #254. For Resident #254, the facility staff failed to assess and monitor a diabetic resident's right great toe after identifying a skin tear. Three days after identifying the skin tear, the resident was transferred to the hospital with a necrotic right great toe and received treatment with antibiotics. The lack of assessment and monitoring resulted in harm to Resident #254. The findings include: For Resident #254 (R254), the facility staff identified a skin tear on her right great toe on 8/26/23. The facility staff failed to evidence further assessment or monitoring of the skin tear until the resident was sent to the hospital in the late afternoon of 8/29/23 with a necrotic (1) right great toe. The lack of assessment and monitoring resulted in harm to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision for three of 14 residents in the survey sample, Residents #2, #11, and #6.The findings include:1. For R2, facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent playing with and ingesting fecal material. R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but was not limited to bipolar disorder (1) and dementia (2). On the most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/13/2025, R2 scored 0 (zero) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R2 was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The Psychiatric Note for R2 dated 09/27/2025 documented in part, Relevant Interval History (Symptoms) Staff reported observing concerning behavior where the patient had a bowel movement and was subsequently playing with and eating her own feces, though the timing of when this behavior started is uncertain. The patient does not exhibit any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide sufficient nursing staff for three of 14 residents in the survey sample, Residents #2, #11, and #6.The findings include:1. For R2, facility staff failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to prevent playing with and ingesting fecal material. R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but was not limited to bipolar disorder (1) and dementia (2). On the most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/13/2025, R2 scored 0 (zero) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R2 was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The Psychiatric Note for R2 dated 09/27/2025 documented in part, Relevant Interval History (Symptoms) Staff reported observing concerning behavior where the patient had a bowel movement and was subsequently playing with and eating her own feces, though the timing of when this behavior started is uncertain. The patient does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to notify the physician of a need to alter treatment for one of 14 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8 (R8). The findings include:For R8, facility staff failed to notify the physician of X-ray results in a timely manner. R8 was admitted with diagnosis that included but not limited to dementia (1). On the most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/21/2025, R8 scored 0 (zero) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R8 was severely impaired for making daily decisions. The facility's incident report dated 11/19/2024 documented in part, Incident date: 11/18/2024. Resident involved: (Name of R8). Incident type: Injury of unknown injury. Resident noticed w/ (with) bruise on left leg. Resident was in her bed. The facility's nursing notes for R8 dated 11/18/2024 at 6:42 a.m. documented Note Text: Staff reported bruise on resident left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review or revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 14 residents, Residents in the survey sample, Resident #2 (R2). The findings include:For R2, the facility staff failed to review or revise comprehensive care plan to address behaviors of play with and ingesting fecal material. R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but was not limited to bipolar disorder (1) and dementia (2). On the most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/13/2025, R2 scored 0 (zero) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R2 was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The Psychiatric Note for R2 dated 09/27/2025 documented in part, Relevant Interval History (Symptoms) Staff reported observing concerning behavior where the patient had a bowel movement and was subsequently playing with and eating her own feces, though the timing of when this behavior started is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to provide care and services in a timely manner for one of 14 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8 (R8). The findings include:For R8, facility staff failed to act on the results of an x-ray in a timely manner. R8 was admitted with diagnosis that included but not limited to dementia (1). On the most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/21/2025, R8 scored 0 (zero) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R8 was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The facility's incident report dated 11/19/2024 documented in part, Incident date: 11/18/2024. Resident involved: (Name of R8). Incident type: Injury of unknown injury. Resident noticed w/ (with) bruise on left leg. Resident was in her bed. The facility's nursing notes for R8 dated 11/18/2024 at 6:42 a.m. documented Note Text: Staff reported bruise on resident left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to store food and maintain a kitchen in a sanitary manner for one of one kitchens. The findings include: Observation was made of the kitchen on 8/5/24 at 11:03 a.m. accompanied by OSM (other staff member) #7, the dietary manager. In the walk-in freezer a carton containing hashbrowns was open and the bag was open to the air. A carton with frozen biscuits was observed open and the bag was open to the air. A carton containing frozen chocolate chip cookies was observed to be open with the bag open to air. When asked how the boxes in the freezer are to be stored, OSM #7 stated the bag is supposed to be tied and the box secured. The griddle was observed and found to have food crumbs and debris on the sides and front of it. When asked when it was last used, OSM #9, the cook, stated, it's been a while since he has used it. The stove was observed to have dried, black, built-up food debris and burned food on the side of the stove and the wells of the burners. The stand-alone oven…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to inform a resident/resident representative of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication treatment for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #87. The findings include: For Resident #87 (R87), the facility staff failed to inform the resident/resident representative of the risks and benefits for the use of multiple psychotropic medications: olanzapine (1)- ordered on 3/11/24, trazodone (2)- ordered on 3/11/24, Depakote (3)- ordered on 3/30/24, and Risperdal (4)- ordered on 4/4/24. R87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia with psychotic disturbance. A review of R87's clinical record revealed the following physician's orders: 3/11/24- olanzapine 2.5 mg (milligrams)- one tablet two times a day for acute psychosis dementia. 3/11/24- trazodone 50 mg- one tablet every night for anxiety. 3/30/24- Depakote 250 mg- one tablet every 12 hours for dementia with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services in a dignified manner, to include retaining personal property, for four of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #94, #81, #162, and #102. The findings include: 1. For Resident #94 (R94), the facility staff failed to allow the resident to retain toiletries in the resident's room. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/14/24, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. A review of R94's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 7/24/24 that documented, Resident becoming increasingly more anxious and agitated after toiletries were removed from her room and placed in shower room per protocol. Attempted to explain to resident with no success. No answer from residents [sic] mother when attempting phone call. Resident behavior continued to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one of two units, the north unit, and for three of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #88, #90, and #81. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain the north unit in a clean and homelike manner. A persistent urine odor was observed on 8/5/24 and 8/6/24. A persistent urine odor was observed throughout the north unit on the following dates and times: 8/5/24 at 12:10 p.m. 8/5/24 at 2:24 p.m. 8/5/24 at 4:04 p.m. 8/6/24 at 8:26 a.m. 8/6/24 at 10:33 a.m. 8/6/24 at 1:10 p.m. On 8/6/24 at 1:13 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA (certified nursing assistant) #1. CNA #1 stated she does notice the urine odor on the north unit and some residents urinate and defecate on the floor. On 8/6/24 at 3:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #1 (the director of environmental services) and OSM #2 (the regional director of environmental services). OSM #2 stated there has been lingering odors on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for eight of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #4, #362, #10, #81, #3, #11, #9 and #74. The findings include: 1. For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for the use of fall mats. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/10/24, the resident scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The resident was assessed as requiring substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and sitting on the side of the bed. Section J documented R4 having no falls since the previous assessment. On 8/5/24 at 12:33 p.m., an observation was made of R4 in their room. R4 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 68 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to a dependent resident for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #362. The findings include: For Resident #362 (R362), the facility staff failed to evidence assistance with turning and repositioning on multiple dates in November 2023, December 2023 and January 2024. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/15/2024, the resident was assessed as being dependent for rolling left and right and transfers. Review of the ADL documentation for R362 from 11/1/2023-11/30/2023 documented the resident requiring extensive to total assistance from one to two persons for bed mobility. It failed to evidence assistance with bed mobility provided on day shift 11/5/23, 11/6/23, 11/7/23, 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 11/26/23 and on evening shift on 11/5/23, 11/13/23, 11/18/23 and 11/23/23. It further failed to evidence assistance with bed mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for the treatment of a pressure injury for three of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #87, #10, and #362. The findings include: 1. For Resident #87 (R87), the facility staff failed to provide physician ordered treatments to the resident's sacral pressure injury on 7/20/24, and 7/30/24. A review of R87's clinical record revealed a wound care physician note dated 7/15/24 that documented an area on R87's sacrum as an unstageable pressure injury (1) measuring 3.5 cm (centimeters) (length) by 2 cm (width) by 0.2 cm (depth). A physician's order dated 7/16/24 documented to cleanse the sacrum with wound cleanser, apply hydrogel and cover with a gauze island dressing every day. A review of R87's July 2024 TAR (treatment administration record) revealed the same 7/16/24 physician's treatment order. Further review of R87's July 2024 TAR failed to reveal treatment was administered on 7/20/24 and 7/30/24 (as evidenced by blank spaces on the TAR).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the physician responded to a pharmacy recommendation for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications; Residents #74, #60 and #51. The findings include: 1. For Resident #74, the facility staff failed to ensure the physician acted on a pharmacy recommendation in a timely manner. A review of the clinical record revealed a Pharmacist Recommendations form dated 11/25/23, for Antipsychotic Reduction Therapy The resident has been taking RISPERDAL (1) 0.5 MG HS (milligrams at bedtime) since (5/2023) without a GDR (gradual dose reduction). Could we attempt a dose reduction at this time to perhaps 0.25 MG HS to verify this resident is on the lowest possible dose? If not, please indicate response below . Further review failed to reveal any evidence that the physician reviewed and signed this form, and chose to or not to reduce the medication dose related to this review. On 8/7/24 at 9:33 AM, ASM #4 (Administrative Staff Member) a Regional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to serve pureed food in a palatable temperature. The findings include: Observation of the kitchen was made on 8/6/24 at 11:20 a.m. The temperature of the pureed food was as followed: Pureed Brussel sprouts - 160 degrees Mashed potatoes - 170 degrees Pureed orange chicken and rice - 161 degrees. The test tray left the kitchen at 12:06 p.m. sitting on top of the food cart. The last resident tray served was at 12:24 p.m. The test tray was then tested. The temperature of the pureed food was as followed: Pureed Brussel sprouts - 110 - a 50 degree drop in temperature. Mashed potatoes - 113.5 - a 56.5 degree drop in temperature. Pureed orange chicken and rice - 108.1 - a 52.9 degree drop in temperature. The test tray was tasted by OSM (other staff member) #7, the dietary manager, and OSM #8, the regional dietary manager and the surveyors. When asked how the chicken and rice tasted regarding its temperature, OSM #7 stated, mediocre. OSM #8 stated the meat was cooler to taste. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was safe to self-administer a medication for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #98. The findings include: For Resident #98 (R98), the facility staff failed to complete an assessment to determine if the resident was safe to self-administer a nebulizer medication. A review of R98's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 6/14/24 for ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution (1) 0.5-2.5 MG (milligram)/3ML (milliliters) three times a day for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further review of R98's clinical record failed to reveal an assessment to determine it was safe for the resident to self-administer the medication. On 8/6/24 at 9:31 a.m., RN (registered nurse) #1 poured the ipratropium-albuterol solution into R98's nebulizer machine, turned on the machine, and handed the mouthpiece to R98. RN #1 exited the room while R98 continued to self-administer the medication. On 8/6/24 at 3:11 p.m., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure 3 of 52 residents in the survey sample were free from abuse; Residents #212, #98 and #96. The findings include: 1. For Resident #212, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident was free from abuse by a staff member (LPN #7) on 3/7/24. Resident #212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 4/9/24. The admission MDS dated [DATE] coded Resident #212 as being cognitively intact in ability to make daily life decisions. A review of the clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 3/7/24 at 7:50 AM that documented, writer observed resident and another staff member engaged in an argument. both parties threw insults and profanity at each other. after a few minutes resident was wheeled to his room and staff member walked down the hallway. A review of a facility synopsis of event form dated 3/7/24 and received by the state agency on 3/7/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policy for three of 52 residents in the survey sample; Residents #212, #96 and #98. The findings include: 1. For Resident #212, the facility staff failed to implement the abuse policy to ensure the resident was free from abuse by a staff member (LPN #7) on 3/7/2 and failed to correctly identify the incident as abuse upon investigation in the facility's report to the required state agency. The facility policy, Abuse documented, Abuse - is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately Prevention: a. The facility will not use verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse .g. The organization will maintain protocols and procedures to identify, correct and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the required state agency in a timely manner for one of 52 residents in the survey sample; Resident #212. The findings include: For Resident #212, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner. On 3/7/24 at 7:50 AM, a nurse's note documented the incident of abuse. The facility did not report the incident to the required state agency until 3/7/24 at 5:19 PM. The facility policy, Abuse documented, Abuse - is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately Prevention: a. The facility will not use verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse .g. The organization will maintain protocols and procedures to identify, correct and intervene in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for three of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, #60 and #26. The findings include: 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to code the resident as receiving hospice care services on the admission MDS. On the most recent MDS assessment, an admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/24/24, the resident scored a three out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely, cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, the resident was not coded as receiving hospice services. The physician orders documented, Admit to (Name of Hospice) effective 7/17/24, Dx (diagnosis) malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of left bronchus or lung (cancer). An interview was conducted on 8/6/24 at 4:51 p.m. with RN (registered nurse) #5, the MDS coordinator. The above admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #90. The findings include: For Resident #90 (R90), the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to include ordered fluid restrictions or monitoring of fluid restrictions. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/6/24, the resident scored 14 of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O documented the resident receiving dialysis services while a resident at the facility. The physician orders for R90 documented in part, Order Date: 6/18/2024. Fluid restriction- 1000ml (milliliter) every shift for dialysis dependent 1,000 ml/day (720 ml from meals (B: 240 ml, L: 240 ml, D: 240 ml) and 280 ml between meals and with medications (140 ml per nursing shift). The progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to clarify the physician's orders for two prescribed diet orders. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 6/10/24, the resident scored a 9 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The assessment documented R4 having no swallowing disorders, no weight loss and not receiving a mechanically altered diet. Observation of meal trays provided to R4 on 8/7/24 during breakfast and lunch revealed mechanical soft diets provided with staff observed assisting R4 to eat. The physician orders documented in part, - Order Date: 06/28/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide interventions for safety and supervision for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4 and Resident #107. The findings include: 1. For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to implement fall mats. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/10/24, the resident scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The resident was assessed as requiring substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and sitting on the side of the bed. Section J documented R4 having no falls since the previous assessment. On 8/5/24 at 12:33 p.m., an observation was made of R4 in their room. R4 was observed in bed with upper bed rails in place. No fall mat was observed. An interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #162. The findings include: For Resident #162 (R162) the facility staff failed to provide indwelling catheter care. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 8/5/24, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section H - Bladder and Bowel, the resident was coded as having had intermittent catheterization during the lookback period. An interview was conducted with R162 on 8/6/24 at 2:12 p.m. R162 stated that he had to have a catheter reinserted because he couldn't void on his own. He doesn't like having it. R162 stated that no one washes around the top of his penis where the catheter goes in. He further stated that the only time it has been cleaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #9 and #3. The findings include: 1. For Resident #9 (R9), the facility staff failed to administered oxygen at the physician prescribed rate and failed to administer the oxygen with a humidifying water. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 6/21/24, the resident scored a 15 out of 15, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section O - Special Treatment, Procedure & Programs, coded the resident as using oxygen during the look back period. Observation was made of R9 on 8/5/24 at 1:06 p.m. sitting in the dining room. The resident had her oxygen on and there was no humidification in use, the humidification bottle was sitting on top of the concentrator. A second…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to monitor fluid restrictions for a hemodialysis patient for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #90. The findings include: For Resident #90 (R90), the facility staff failed to evidence monitoring of ordered fluid restrictions. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/6/24, the resident scored 14 of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O documented the resident receiving dialysis (1) services while a resident at the facility. On 8/5/24 at 2:22 p.m., an interview was conducted with R90 in their room. R90 stated that they attended dialysis four days a week which had recently been increased due to increased fluid retention. R90 stated that they had been placed on a fluid restriction due to this. The physician orders for R90 documented in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that two of 52 residents in the survey sample were free of unnecessary medications, Resident #60 and Resident #81. The findings include: 1. For Resident #60 (R60), the facility staff failed to act upon pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner which resulted in the resident potentially receiving unnecessary medication. On 8/7/24 at 12:00 p.m., a request was made to ASM (administrative staff member) #3, the regional director of clinical operations for evidence of any pharmacy recommendations from the monthly medication regimen reviews with evidence of facility and physician response from 10/1/23 to the present. On 8/8/24 at 3:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with ASM #2, the director of nursing. ASM #2 stated that the pharmacist came in monthly to complete the monthly reviews and provided her with a list of residents that stated whether or not they gave any recommendations or not. She stated that for R60, the pharmacist had made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that three of 52 residents in the survey sample were free from and/or monitored for the use of psychotropic medications, Residents #81, #87 and #94. The findings include: 1. For Resident #81 (R81), the facility staff failed to monitor the use of an antidepressant medication. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/10/24, the resident was assessed as taking an antidepressant medication while a resident at the facility. The physician orders for R81 documented in part, - Order Date: 07/13/2024 Lexapro Oral Tablet 10 MG (milligram) (Escitalopram Oxalate) Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day for Depression/Anxiety Give 20mg (2 tablet) daily for anxiety/depression. - Order Date: 07/12/2024 Valproic Acid Oral Solution 250 MG/5ML (Valproate Sodium) Give 5 ml by mouth every 8 hours for MDD (major depressive disorder). Hold if lethargic. The physician/NP progress notes for R81 documented in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store medications in a locked compartment for one of six medications carts, a medication cart on the south unit. The findings include: 1. For one medication cart on the south unit, RN (registered nurse) #1 failed to lock the cart while he was in a resident room. On 8/6/24 at 8:57 a.m., RN #1 left the medication cart in the hall unlocked while administering medications in a resident room. The medication cart was not in RN #1's line of sight. On 8/6/24 at 3:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN #1. RN #1 stated nurses should lock the medication cart when it is not in their line of sight because someone may open the cart and mess up the medications. On 8/7/24 at 5:20 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the administrator), and ASM #2 (the director of nursing) were made aware of the above concern. The facility pharmacy policy titled, Storage of Medications documented, 2. Only licensed nurses, pharmacy personnel, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document, it was determined that the facility staff failed to accommodate needs for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Resident #28. The findings include: The facility staff failed to accommodate Resident #28 (R28) with their bathing preference. R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to severe morbid obesity (1) and body mass index [BMI] 70 or greater, adult (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/23/2023, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating that they were cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section G coded R28 as requiring extensive assistance of two or more persons for transfers and totally dependent on one person for bathing. It documented R28 not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance when walking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care according to resident preference for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Resident #28. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide bathing according to resident requests and preferences for Resident #28 (R28). R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to severe morbid obesity (1) and body mass index [BMI] 70 or greater, adult (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/23/2023, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating that they were cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section G coded R28 as requiring extensive assistance of two or more persons for transfers and totally dependent on one person for bathing. It documented R28 not steady, but able…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to resolve resident concerns expressed at Resident Council meetings for two of three months of minutes reviewed, June and July 2023. The findings include: In both June and July 2023, residents raised concerns about breakfast food during the Resident Council meetings; the facility failed to respond to and resolve these concerns. A review of Resident Council meeting minutes from June 2023 revealed, in part: Resident Concerns/Issues .[resident] states when she receives her toast for breakfast, it is not toasted, it is a plain white piece of bread .[resident] stated when she receives her toast for breakfast, it is not toasted, it is a plain white piece of bread .[resident] does not receive any condiments with her toast or meals .[resident] states she wants to have scrambled or boiled eggs for breakfast twice a week .[resident] states when she receives her toast for breakfast, it is not toasted, it is a plain white piece of bread .Response and follow up: I emailed my regional director about the toaster isn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews and facility document reviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for six of 45 residents in the survey sample, Residents #28, #72, #10, #98, #25, and #87. The findings include: 1. For Resident #28 (R28), the facility staff failed to, implement the care plan for non-pharmacological interventions prior to as needed pain medications; develop the care plan for a diagnosis of diabetes; develop the care plan for the use of a diuretic medication; and develop the care plan for the use of an anticoagulant medication. Resident #28's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/23/2023, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The assessment documented R28 having a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, receiving as needed pain medication and not receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence of providing ADLs (activities of daily living) for two of 45 residents in the survey sample, Residents #72 and #303. The findings include: 1. For Resident #72 (R72), the facility staff failed to evidence a bath or shower was provided on 7/20/2023, 7/27/2023, 8/7/2023, 8/17/2023 or 8/28/2023. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/16/2023, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The assessment documented R72 requiring supervision of one person for personal hygiene and being independent in bathing with assistance of one person. On 8/29/2023 at 12:32 p.m., an interview was conducted with R72. R72 stated that there were times when they did not get their showers when they were scheduled. R72 stated that they were supposed to get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents for three of 45 residents in the survey sample, Residents #6, #60, and #28. The findings include: 1. For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to provide showers/baths and personal hygiene on multiple dates in July and August 2023. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/3/23, R6 was coded as being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. She was coded as requiring the extensive assistance of staff for toileting and personal hygiene, and as being completely dependent on staff assistance for bathing. On 8/29/23 at 11:57 a.m., R6 was interviewed. She stated the staff has not been very good about getting me cleaned up in the mornings. She stated she does not always get a shower on her scheduled shower days. A review of R6's POC (point of care) records for July and August 2023 revealed no evidence of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record reviews and facility document reviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a complete pain management program for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Resident #28. The findings include: For Resident #28 (R28), the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program including non-pharmacological interventions prior to administration of as needed pain medications. Resident #28's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/23/2023, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The assessment documented R28 receiving as needed pain medication, not receiving non-medication interventions for pain and not having any pain. On 8/29/2023 at 12:33 p.m., an interview was conducted with R28. R28 stated that they took medications for pain. R28 stated that they asked the nurses for pain medication when they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to monitor weights as ordered for a resident receiving dialysis, for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Resident #25. The findings include: For Resident #25 (R25), who was receiving dialysis, the facility staff failed to obtain weights per the provider's order. A review of R25's orders revealed the following orders: 7/28/23 Notify primary clinician for Weight gain of 2 or more pounds in 1 day or 5 pounds or more in 5 days. 7/29/23 Hemodialysis at [name of dialysis center] .MWF (Monday, Wednesday, Friday. A review of R25's weights revealed weights recorded on the following dates in August 2023: 8/2, 8/4, 8/10, 8/13, 8/18, 8/21, and 8/23. The clinical record revealed no other weights recorded for R25 in August 2023. A review of R25's care plan dated 6/26/23 revealed, in part: The resident has ESRD (end stage renal disease) and receives dialysis .Pre-Post dialysis weights. On 8/31/23 at 10:43 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #11 was interviewed. After reviewing R25's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence monitoring of psychotropic medication adverse effects and behavior monitoring for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Resident #98. The findings include: For Resident #98 (R98), the facility staff failed to monitor for adverse effects and record targeted behavioral symptoms related to anti-psychotic medication use. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/6/2023, the resident scored 5 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. The assessment documented R98 receiving an antipsychotic medication 6 of the 7 days during the assessment period. The physician orders for R98 documented in part, - Risperidone Oral Tablet 2 MG (milligram) (Risperidone) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Anxiety. Order Date: 7/1/2023. The clinical record for R98 failed to evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. The facility staff failed to date and dispose of opened food in one of one kitchen areas. The findings include: The facility staff failed to date and dispose of opened food identified during the facility task- kitchen observation. On 8/29/23 at 11:00 AM, an observation was conducted in the main kitchen. In the freezer, one bag of approximately 12 hamburger patties was torn open. There was no label on bag of date opened or expiration date. In the dry storage area, there was approximately three pounds of dried medium size noodles in a plastic bag that had been torn open. There was no label on bag indicating the date opened or when it expired. An interview was conducted on 8/29/23 at 11:20 AM with OSM (other staff member) #1, the dietary manager. When asked to review the opened bag of hamburger patties and noodles, OSM #1 stated, they should not have opened these bags like this, they should have a date and be secured with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence that education and information regarding risks vs benefits of the influenza and/or pneumonia vaccines were provided to the resident and/or resident representative, prior to the vaccines being administered or refused, for four of five residents reviewed for immunizations; Residents #82, #93, #16, and #46. The findings include: The facility policy, Influenza Vaccination was reviewed. This policy documented, The facility will provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to staff and residents (or residents' legal representatives); for example, risk factors that have been identified for specific age groups or individuals with risk factors 2. Before offering influenza immunization, each resident or the resident's legal representative or employee will receive education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization .4. Consent for the administration of the influenza vaccination will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to assess one of 45 residents in the survey sample for self-administration of medication, Resident #72. The findings include: For Resident #72 (R72), the facility staff failed to assess for self-administration of medication. During the medication administration observation task, R72 was observed to have a bottle of Fluticasone nasal spray (1) on the overbed table and self administered the medication when asked by LPN (licensed practical nurse) #7. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/16/2023, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. On 8/30/2023 at 8:05 a.m., an observation was made of LPN #7 preparing and administering medications to R72. LPN #7 prepared a medication cup of scheduled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for three of 31 rooms on the north unit. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident #23 was a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Dried pureed food was found when the cubicle curtain was pulled for privacy during resident care. An interview was conducted on 8/31/23 at 10:11 AM, with OSM (other staff member) #8, housekeeping. When asked how rooms are cleaned, OSM #8 stated, they are cleaned every day. They sweep and mop, wipe all surfaces with peroxide multi surface cleaner, it takes 3 minutes to dry. OSM #8 stated, When the resident goes home, we clean the curtains. If the curtain is dirty while the resident is here, we change the curtain. We are to look at the curtain every day. We clean in hallways, common areas every day. An interview was conducted on 8/31/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident, for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Residents #65. The findings include: The facility failed to protect Resident #65 from physical abuse from another resident, Resident #36 on 2/14/23 and 4/13/23. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's Disease, diabetes mellitus and dementia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/23/23, coded the resident as scoring a 00 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 12/17/22, which revealed, FOCUS: The resident has a behavior problem of pushing other residents in their wheelchairs, inviting another resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for two of 45 residents in the survey sample; Residents #153 and #353. The findings include: The facility policy, Baseline Care Plans was reviewed. This policy documented, A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. 1. To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. 2. The Interdisciplinary Team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders (e.g., dietary needs, medications, routine treatments, etc.) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs 1. The facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for fall prevention with interventions, for Resident #153. Resident #153 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and/or revise the care plan for three of 45 residents in the survey sample; Residents #153, #65, and #50. The findings include: The facility policy, Care Plan Goals and Objectives was reviewed. This policy documented, Care plans shall incorporate goals and objectives that lead to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence. 1. Care plan goals and objectives are defined as the desired outcome for a specific resident problem or opportunity 2. When goals and objectives are not achieved, the resident's clinical record will be documented as to why the results were not achieved and what new goals and objectives have been established. Care plans will be modified accordingly 5. Goals and objectives are reviewed/revised: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. When the desired outcome has not been achieved . 1. For…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for three of 45 residents in the survey sample, Residents #6, #253, and #303. The findings include: 1. For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff administered a medication to her to which the resident had a documented allergy. A review of R6's allergies listed on the electronic medical record revealed, in part: Allergies: Erythromycin (1). A review of R6's provider's orders revealed the following order, written 8/1/23: Azithromycin (2) Oral Tablet 250 MG (milligrams) .Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for copd (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) exacerbation for 5 Days. 2 tabs today, 1 tab days 2-5. A review of R6's August 2023 MAR (medication administration record) revealed R6 received Azithromycin as ordered on 8/1/23 and 8/2/23. A review of R6's progress notes revealed the following note dated 8/1/23: Order Note Text: The system has identified a possible drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement treatments and/or interventions to prevent and treat a pressure injury for three of 45 residents in the survey sample, Residents #7, #87, and #98. The findings include: 1. For Resident #7 (R7), the facility staff failed to elevate the resident's heels to prevent a pressure injury. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/30/23, R7 was coded as being moderately impaired for making daily decisions, having scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as being at risk for a pressure injury, and as having no unhealed pressure injuries. On the following dates and times, R7 was observed lying in bed, with bed heels in direct contact with the mattress surface: 8/29/23 at 12:25 p.m. and 3:41 p.m.; 8/30/23 at 8:46 a.m. and 1:07 p.m. A review of R7's Braden Scale…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement interventions for resident safety related to falls for one of 45 residents in the survey sample; Resident #7. The findings include: For Resident #7 (R7), the facility staff failed to apply a physician-ordered helmet to the resident. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/30/23, R7 was coded as being moderately impaired for making daily decisions, having scored nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as having had two falls without injuries during the look back period. On the following dates and times, R7 was observed lying in bed, without a helmet: 8/39/23 at 12:25 p.m. and 3:41 p.m.; 8/30/23 at 8:46 a.m. and 1:07 p.m. A review of R7's orders revealed the following order, dated 6/14/23: Foam helmet on at all times. Check placement and document refusal. A review of R7's care plan dated 1/18/23 and updated 6/14/23 revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to report non-compliance with fluid restrictions to the physician for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Resident #10. The findings include: For Resident #10 (R10), the facility staff failed to report non-compliance with fluid restrictions to the physician. The physician orders for R10 documented in part, Fluid Restriction 2000cc per day: 600cc breakfast, 120cc morning medpass, 480cc lunch, 120cc afternoon medpass, 480cc dinner, 120cc evening meds, 80cc extra every shift related to Acute On Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) heart failure. Order Date: 09/02/2021. Review of the eTAR (electronic treatment administration record) dated 6/1/2023-6/30/2023 for R10 documented intake amounts totaled for each shift. The eTAR documented a total amount of 2700cc on 6/4/2023, 2340cc on 6/19/2023 and 2360cc on 6/28/2023. The eTAR failed to evidence notification of the physician of non-compliance with the 2000cc per day fluid restrictions. Review of the eTAR dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for two of 45 residents, Residents #6 and #253. The findings include: 1. For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to store the nebulizer mask in a sanitary manner. On the following dates and times, R6's nebulizer mask was observed to be uncovered and lying across the nebulizer machine: 8/29/23 at 11:57 a.m. and 3:36 p.m.; and 8/30/23 at 8:19 a.m. A review of R6's orders revealed the following order dated 8/10/23: Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution (1) 0.5-2.5 MG/3ML (milligrams per milliliter) 3 ml inhale orally three times a day for SOB (shortness of breath)/respiratory failure/COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of R6's August 2023 MAR (medication administration record) revealed she had received the medication as ordered. On 8/31/23 at 10:43 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #11 was interviewed. She stated nebulizer equipment, and especially the nebulizer mask, should be washed after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide physician/provider supervision of a resident's condition for two of 45 residents in the survey sample, Residents #254 and #87. The findings include: 1. For Resident #254, the facility NP (nurse practitioner) failed to respond to notification about a resident who had received a skin tear, and failed to assess the resident following the skin tear. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/11/23, R254 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions, having scored one out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). R254 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes, dementia, and polyneuropathy (1). On 8/29/23 at 12:08 p.m., R254 was observed sitting in a wheelchair beside her bed. R254's daughter was seated beside the resident. R254's right leg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete laboratory testing to prevent administration of an unnecessary medication for one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Resident #253. The findings include: For Resident #253 (R253), the facility staff failed obtain INR (international normalized ratio) (1) levels for Resident #253, as ordered by the physician. A review of R253's progress notes revealed, in part (all notes written by ASM (administrative staff member) #5, the nurse practitioner (NP)), unless otherwise noted: 8/14/23 Hx (history) of DVT (deep vein thrombosis) (2). Continue with Warfarin (3). Start INR. 8/17/23 Hx DVT. Stop Warfarin. Start INR Saturday. Start bridge to Xarelto (4) 10 [milligrams] when INR < 3. 8/19/23 Have pt (patient) check INR with her machine supplies. 8/21/23 Hx DVT .Stop warfarin. INR done on Saturday? not reported to NP or recorded in progress notes. 8/25/23 INR reported to be 1.3. This note was written by a nurse who was unavailable for interview at the time of the survey. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document , it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate and complete facility assessment for care of one of 45 residents in the survey sample, Resident #28. The findings include: For Resident #28 (R28), the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate and complete facility assessment for care of bariatric residents greater than 500 lbs. R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to severe morbid obesity (1) and body mass index [BMI] 70 or greater, adult (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/23/2023, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating that they were cognitively intact for making daily decisions. On 8/29/2023 at 12:33 p.m., an interview was conducted with R28. R28 stated that they had resided at the facility for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide complete and accurate documentation for two of 45 residents, Resident #353 and #98. The findings include: 1. For Resident #353, the facility staff failed to evidence complete and accurate documentation for bladder and bowel elimination, bed mobility, and personal hygiene. Resident #353 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but are not limited to: pacemaker, Afib (atrial fibrillation), DM (diabetes mellitus) and bipolar. Resident #353's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare 5-day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 4/8/23, coded the resident as scoring 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. MDS Section G- Functional Status: coded the resident as total dependence with bathing, extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence that education and information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine was provided to the resident and/or resident representative prior to the vaccine being refused, for one of five residents reviewed for immunizations; Resident #82. The findings include: The facility policy, COVID-19 Vaccination for Residents was reviewed. This policy documented, .2. Resident / resident representatives will be educated on: a) risks / benefits of COVID-19 vaccination. The education will be specific to vaccine being offered/administered and; b) current CDC guidelines for vaccination or residents for COVID-19 and; c) Symptoms, risks and benefits associated with the COVID-19 virus .5. Prior to administration of the COVID-19 vaccine, consent will be obtained from the resident / resident representative and will be documented in the resident's medical record For Resident #82, the facility staff failed to evidence that education and information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide food at a palatable temperature during lunch service on 02/16/2022, with the potential to affect 55 of 55 residents on the North unit receiving a meal tray. The vegetables, potatoes, and mechanical soft vegetables served at lunch and tested for palatability were below a palatable temperature. The findings include: Review of the resident council minutes from 11/30/2021 revealed in part, .Residents state their food is not hot when they receive their meals. Review of the resident council minutes from 12/01/2021 revealed in part, .Resident states his meals are not hot when he receives them in his room each shift .Resident states .food is not hot all meals .Resident states his breakfast is cold when received each morning . On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) for Resident # 23, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/14/2021, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician or resident representative of a change in condition or a possible need to alter treatment for two of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents #45 and #11. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to notify Resident #45's physician (or nurse practitioner) when the physician prescribed medications Flomax (1), Metformin (2) and Buspar (3) were not administered on multiple dates in October 2021, November 2021, December 2021 and January 2022, and failed to notify the physician (or nurse practitioner) when the physician prescribed medication Levaquin (4) was not administered on 2/15/22. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45's diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes and benign prostatic hyperplasia. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/9/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-17 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to provide the required documentation to the hospital for two transfers to the hospital for Resident #104. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with two recent readmissions on 1/25/2022 and 1/31/2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a Medicare five day assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/3/2022, the resident scored a 3 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. The nurses' note dated, 1/15/2022 at 9:37 p.m. documented, Resident decreased LOC (level of consciousness), no PO (by mouth) intake. 179/91 (blood pressure) heart rate 109, resp (respirations) 16, temp (temperature) 97.6. Spoke with wife/RP (responsible party) regarding change in condition and she requested he be sent to hospital. EMS (emergency medical services) transport resident to hospital. Sent with bed hold policy and current records. Report called to [name of hospital].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for eight of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents #43, #407, #18, #70, #73, #61, #45 and #307. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to develop a care plan for Resident #43's G-tube (gastrostomy tube) (1) and drainage bag. Resident # 43 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but not limited to ulcerative colitis. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/08/2022, the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. On 02/15/22 at 12:01 p.m., an observation of Resident # 43 was observed lying in bed with G-tube connected to a drainage bag that was hung on side of their bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's highest level of well-being for five of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 43, # 91, #11, # 45 and # 73. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for the care and treatment of Resident # 43's G-tube (gastrostomy tube) (1) and drainage bag. Resident # 43 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but not limited to ulcerative colitis. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/08/2022, the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. On 02/15/22 at 12:01 p.m., an observation of Resident # 43 was observed lying in bed with G-tube connected to a drainage bag that was hung on side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program by documenting the location of the resident's pain and implementing non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a prn (as needed) pain medications for two of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 35 and # 77. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to document the location of the Resident #35's pain, and to implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of oxycodone (1). Resident # 35 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included contractures. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/04/2022, the resident scored 5 (five) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The resident was coded as frequently experiencing pain at a level of three out of 10 during the look…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide pharmacy services for one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #45. The facility staff failed to acquire Resident #45's medication Buspar (1) for administration on multiple dates in October 2021, November 2021 and January 2022. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45's diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes and benign prostatic hyperplasia. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/9/22, the resident scored 11 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 5/14/21 for Buspar 5 mg (milligrams) by mouth three times a day for anxiety. Review of Resident #45's October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychoactive medications for 2 of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents #70 and #61. The findings include: 1. For Resident #70, the facility failed to evidence documented appropriate diagnosis, target behaviors, behavior monitoring, monitoring of medication effectiveness, psychiatric evaluations as ordered/recommended, and care plan implementation as related to the use of psychoactive medications. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, breast cancer, and anxiety disorder. On the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), a 5-day assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 1/18/22, the resident scored a 4 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. The findings include; On 02/15/2022 at approximately 10:40 a.m., an observation of the facility's kitchen was conducted with OSM (other staff member) # 12, dietary manager with the following concerns: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure a food processor, ready for use, was cleaned and free from standing water. Observation of the food processor located in the facility's kitchen on a food preparation table was conducted with OSM # 12. When asked if the food processor was cleaned and ready for use, OSM # 12 stated, Yes. Observation of the inside of the food processor lid revealed it was wet, with standing water inside the bowl, and with a wet blade. After observing the food processor bowl OSM # 12 stated that the inside of the lid and blade were wet and that the bowl contained approximately one to two tablespoons of standing water. OSM # 12 immediately removed the food processor lid, blade and bowl and sent it to the dish washer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a dignified dining experience in one of two dining rooms, the North Wing dining room. The facility staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience on the North Wing, not serving all residents at the same table at the same time. The findings include: Observation was made of the North Wing, the secured dementia unit, on 2/15/2022 at 12:02 p.m. The cart of trays arrived on the unit at 12:02 p.m. The staff started delivering trays to the dining room and resident rooms at the same time. Four residents were sitting at a table by the back wall. The first resident got their tray at 12:11 p.m. The second resident got their tray at 12:18 p.m. The third resident got their tray at 12:26 p.m. The fourth resident got their tray at 12:27 p.m., sixteen minutes after the first resident was served. A second table, where four residents were seated, was observed near the front of the dining room. The first resident at that table got their tray at 12:12 p.m. The second…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide skilled nursing facility advance beneficiary notice of non-coverage (SNFABN) to two of three beneficiary protection notification resident reviews, Resident #87 and Resident #357. The findings include: 1. Resident #87's last covered day of Medicare part A services was 8/14/21. The facility staff failed to provide the advance beneficiary notice to Resident #87 (and/or the resident's representative). Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to COVID-19, multiple sclerosis and seizures. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/25/22, the resident scored 9 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The progress notes for Resident #87 documented in part, 6/23/2021 10:04 (10:04 a.m.) MD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence written notification was provided to the responsible party and/or the ombudsman for a facility-initiated transfer for 2 of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #81 and Resident #104. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence written notification of transfer was provided to Resident #81 and/or their representative for a facility-initiated transfer on 2/13/2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a 5-day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/22/2022, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The progress notes for Resident #81 documented in part, 2/13/2022 17:57 (5:57 p.m.) Resident was sent to the hospital as advised by physician due to critical lab results, last vital signs taken 86/46 (blood pressure), HR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence bed hold notice was provided to the resident and/or the responsible party for a facility-initiated transfer for 2 of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents #81and #60. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence bed hold notice was provided to Resident #81 and/or their representative for a facility-initiated transfer on 2/13/2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a 5-day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/22/2022, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The progress notes for Resident #81 documented in part, 2/13/2022 17:57 (5:57 p.m.) Resident was sent to the hospital as advised by physician due to critical lab results, last vital signs taken 86/46 (blood pressure), HR (heart rate) 89, O2 (oxygen) 92,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and/or revise the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents #61 and #45. The findings include: 1. For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan after a fall with injury on 1/2/22. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the diagnoses of but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, depression, high blood pressure and history of falls. On the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 1/10/22, the resident scored a 3 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A review of the clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 1/2/22 that documented, This morning at approximately 07:20 am (7:20 AM) this nurse was called to room [number] by certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 11 and # 307. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain a physician order for the use of oxygen, and failed to store the oxygen cannula and tubing in a sanitary manner for Resident #11. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure and asthma. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/30/2021, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Section O did not code the resident as having used oxygen. Observation was made of Resident #11 on 2/15/2022 at 11:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide communication to the dialysis facility for one of 44 residents, Resident #407. For Resident #407, the facility failed to provide communication to the dialysis facility for 23 to 25 visits. The findings include: Resident #407 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #407's diagnoses included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease (end stage of renal failure-inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes and function in the maintenance of electrolyte balance) (1), congestive heart failure (abnormal congestion caused by circulatory congestion and retention salt and water by the kidneys) (2) and chronic respiratory failure (inability of the heart and lungs to maintain and adequate level of gas exchange) (3). Resident #407's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a five day assessment, with an assessment reference date of 12/31/21, coded the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct annual performance reviews for 2 of 3 CNAs (certified nursing assistants) whose records were reviewed, CNAs #4 and #6. The findings include: The facility staff failed to conduct a performance review for CNA #4, hired on 3/7/2017 and reviewed for performance evaluation completed between 3/1/2020-3/31/2021; and CNA #6, hired on 11/8/1993 and reviewed for performance evaluation completed between 11/1/2020-11/30/2021. On 2/16/22 at approximately 8:00 a.m., a list of CNAs who were employed at the facility for more than one year was provided by ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator. On 2/16/22 at approximately 12:15 p.m., ASM #2, the director of nursing, was asked to provide the annual performance reviews for the CNAs selected from the facility list. Review of the annual performance reviews failed to reveal a completed review after 11/11/2020 for CNA #4 (hired 3/7/2017) and CNA #6 (hired on 11/8/1993). On 2/16/22 at 5:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 of 44 residents in the survey sample was free of unnecessary medications, Resident #359. On 7/27/2021, the facility staff administered Narcan nasal spray to Resident #359, rather than the physician-ordered and scheduled saline nasal spray. The findings include: Resident #359 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic pain and low back pain. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/12/2021, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section J coded Resident #359 as having pain almost constantly. On 2/16/2022 at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #13, the ombudsman. OSM #13 that they had received an anonymous report that Resident #359 had received Narcan by mistake from the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free of a significant medication error for one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #45. On 2/9/22, the nurse practitioner prescribed Resident #45 the medication Levaquin (1) for seven days for a diagnosis of pneumonia. The facility staff failed to administer Levaquin to Resident #45 on 2/15/22. The findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45's diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes and benign prostatic hyperplasia. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/9/22, the resident scored 11 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Review of Resident #45's clinical record revealed a note signed by the nurse practitioner on 2/9/22 that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to document showers for Resident #53. The findings include: Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #53's diagnoses included but were not limited to: scoliosis (abnormal lateral or sideward curve to the spine) (1), pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas usually caused by alcohol or gallstones) (2) and obsessive compulsive disorder (uncontrollable need to repeat certain acts or rituals) (3). Resident #53's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/15/21, coded the resident as scoring 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Section G coded the resident as requiring limited assistance for bathing. A review of Resident #53's comprehensive care plan dated 3/9/20, revealed in part, Resident has an ADL (activity of daily living) self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices for 1 of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #207. Resident #207 was observed being assisted into the main dining room on the North unit for the lunch meal with other residents on 2/15/22 at 12:25 PM. Resident #207 was a newly admitted , unvaccinated resident who was on quarantine isolation for COVID-19 monitoring and observation. The main dining room on the North unit was filled with COVID-19 negative residents who were not on quarantine isolation. Resident #207's presence in this dining room placed other residents in the dining room at risk for contracting COVID-19. The findings include: Resident #207 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Wernicke's encephalopathy, dysphagia, high blood pressure, and alcohol abuse. An MDS had not yet been completed at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and employee record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 of 3 CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed received the required annual training. The facility failed to provide evidence that CNA #5 received the required annual abuse training. The findings include: On 2/16/22 at approximately 4:00 p.m., a review of the facility's CNA annual training was conducted. Review of three CNA training transcripts revealed one of three CNAs selected for review did not complete annual abuse training for 2021. Review of CNA #5's training transcript documented a hire date of 6/29/09. The transcript documented Preventing, Recognizing, and Reporting Resident Abuse completed on 1/8/2010, 10/11/2012 and 3/15/2015. On 2/17/22 at 5:10 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #7, human resource manager, stated that they did not have any evidence of abuse training for CNA #5 except for a signature acknowledging receipt of the facility abuse policy and mandated reporter status dated 7/1/2021. On 2/17/22 at 7:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-01 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to post the required nursing staffing information on one of four days of the survey, 8/29/23. The findings include: On 8/29/23 at 10:45 a.m., observation was made of the posted nursing staffing information. The posting was located at the front receptionist's desk. The posted staffing information was dated 8/28/23. No staffing information for 8/29/23 could be seen. On 8/31/23 at 10:21 a.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, was interviewed. She stated she is filling in for the staffing coordinator, and that a new staffing coordinator had just started training on 8/28/23. She stated: I am responsible for posting the staffing information. During the week, I put it up myself first thing in the morning. I try to get it up before 8:00 [a.m.]. It should be up before them. She stated corporate staff had arrived at the facility on the morning of 8/29/23 and she had gotten distracted from posting the staffing information. No further information was provided prior to exit.
- No harm found · C2023-09-01 · tag F0813 — widespreadHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence a policy regarding the use and storage of food brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption. The findings include: On 8/29/23 at 11:00 AM during entrance conference, and on 8/30/23 at 9:00 AM, a request was made for the facility's policy on Food Brought From Home. On 8/30/23 at approximately 12:00 PM, ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, stated they do not have a policy but will ask dietary services if they had a policy. On 8/30/23 at approximately 3:00 PM, ASM #1, the administrator, stated there is no policy. The ASM #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing and ASM #3, the regional nurse consultant was made aware of the finding on 8/30/23 at 5:00 PM. No further information was provided prior to exit.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$146,073 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $109,725 — penalty dated 2024-08-08
- $36,348 — penalty dated 2023-09-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DERKO 2, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 01/08/2016 |
| REG 2018 IRREVOCABLE TRUST U/A/D 1/1/18 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 01/01/2018 |
| KUSHNER, JUDY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 01/08/2016 |
| COONS, AMANDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/20/2022 |
| GUTNICKI, ABRAHAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/16/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $504K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495267. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.