No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Winchester Health & Rehabilitation

110 Lauck Dr, Winchester, VA 22603 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (540) 667-7830 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (540) 667-7830 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Apr 2023
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
400 Campus Blvd · (540) 536-5466 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
200 Rivendell Court · (540) 545-8301 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.5 mi
249 Sunnyside Plaza Cir · (540) 667-5851 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Star Fort0.4 mi
545 Fortress Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1270 N Frederick Pike · (540) 662-4676

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.4%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms42.3%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.4%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.2%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.9%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.4%14.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.7%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.4%11.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.951.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.201.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 272 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.3%CMS range 51.0–62.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 9.7–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting68.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.6–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
64.0%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

27
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-04-12)
25
at the previous standard inspection (2021-09-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of medications that were unavailable for administration for three of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1, #3, and #12.The findings include:1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to notify the physician of medications unavailable for administration on 5/20/25. A review of R1's clinical record revealed the following progress note dated 9/20/25 at 4:00 p.m.: Resident arrived in a W/C (wheelchair) to floor Little before 1500 (3:00 p.m.). Pleasant and cooperate (sic) with staff.Resident alert and orient (sic) x 3.Resident receives Hemodialysis Tue (Tuesday), Thurs (Thursday), and Saturday. A review of R1's orders revealed, in part:Insulin Glargine 100 unit/ml (units per milliliter) Inject 15 units subcutaneously every night shift. Colesevelam (to treat high cholesterol) 625 mg (milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Coreg (to treat high blood pressure) 6.25 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Lyrica (to treat nerve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide medications as ordered for four of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #3 (R3), R11, R1 and R12. The findings include:1. For R3, facility staff failed to administer Panoxyl (1) according to the physician's orders. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/07/2024, R3 scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The physician's order for R3 documented in part, Panoxyl External Liquid (Benzoyl Peroxide) Apply to body topically one time a day for acne. Order date: 9/20/2024. Discontinue Date: 11/05/0224. The eMAR (electronic medication administration record) dated September 2024 for R3 documented the physician's orders as stated above. The eMAR further documented R3 received Panoxyl two of ten opportunities. The eMAR (electronic medication administration record) dated October 2024 for R3 documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a call bell in a position that was accessible to the resident for one of 17 residents in the survey sample, Resident #5.The findings include:For Resident #5 (R5), the facility staff failed to maintain the call bell in reach.On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/24/25, the resident was assessed as being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. R5 was assessed as not having any limitations in range of motion to the upper extremities, dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and requiring substantial to maximal assistance for transfers.On 9/8/2025 at 12:05 p.m., an observation was made of R5 in their room. R5 was observed lying in bed with the call bell observed on the right upper bed rail wrapped around the lower portion of the rail. When asked if they were able to reach their call bell, R5 attempted to locate the call bell and stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote the resident's highest level of wellbeing for two of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #3 (R3) and R1. The findings include:1. For R3, facility staff failed to assess and monitor a skin rash. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/07/2024, R3 scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The physician's order for R3 documented in part, Panoxyl (1) External Liquid (Benzoyl Peroxide) Apply to body topically one time a day for acne. Order date: 9/20/2024. Discontinue Date: 11/05/0224. The eMAR (electronic medication administration record) for R3 dated September 2024 documented the physician's order as stated above. The facility's weekly skin observation sheet for R3 dated 09/16/2024, 09/23/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party and/or the physician when medications were not available for administration for three of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #37, #14 and #262. The findings include: 1. For Resident #37 (R37), the facility staff failed to notify the physician when medications when the medication, Lyrica, was not available for administration. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/16/2023, the resident scored a 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. An interview was conducted with R37 on 4/10/2023 at approximately 2:00 p.m. R37 stated the facility runs out of their Lyrica (used to treat neuropathic pain) (1) at times. The physician order dated, 2/10/2023, documented, Lyrica 75 mg; Give 1 capsule by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement their policies for screening potential employees for 13 of 25 employee record reviews. The findings include: For the following employees the criminal background check was not completed within 30 days of hire: 1. OSM (other staff member) #9, hired 12/2/2022. Criminal background check dated 4/11/2023, after it was requested by the survey team. 2. LPN (licensed practical nurse) #6, hired 12/1/2022, criminal background check was dated 9/26/2022. 3. LPN #7 hired on 2/14/2022. There was no evidence of a criminal background check. There was no employee record. 4. RN (registered nurse) #4, hired 6/1/2022. There was no evidence of a criminal background check. There was no employee record. 5. CNA (certified nursing assistant) #7, hired 7/1/2022. The criminal background check was dated 3/15/2023. 6. LPN #8, hired 7/13/2021. There was no evidence of a criminal background check. There was no employee record. 7. LPN #9, hired 2/14/2022. There was no evidence of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for five of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 110, #14, #37, #3 and #61. The findings include: 1. For Resident #110 (R110) the facility staff failed to implement the care plan for colostomy care. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, the resident scored a 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. In Section H - Bladder and Bowel, the resident was coded as having an ostomy. The comprehensive care plan dated, 6/16/2022, documented in part, Focus: Resident has a colostomy. The Interventions documented, Administer care as ordered. The physician order dated, 6/3/2022, documented, Ostomy: Colostomy Care every shift and as needed, every 12 hours for Ostomy. The TAR (treatment administration record) for June 2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. For Resident #37, the facility staff failed to follow the physician orders for the administration of Midodrine (used to treat orthostatic hypotension. Midodrine works by causing blood vessels to tighten, which increases blood pressure) (1). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/16/2023, the resident scored a 12 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. The physician order dated, 10/7/2022, documented, Midodrine 10 mg (milligrams); 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for hypotension. Hold if above SBP (systolic blood pressure) 120. The March 2023 MAR (medication administration record) documented the above order. The MAR documented the medication was administered on the following days and times with a systolic blood pressure greater or above 120: 3/1/2023 at 6:00 a.m. - 134/76 3/1/2023 at 10:00 p.m. - 130/76 3/2/2023 at 6:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services per plan of care and/or in a sanitary manner for four of 32 residents in the survey sample; Residents #61, #14, #3, and #7. The findings include: 1. For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to ensure that oxygen was administered as ordered on multiple dates in February and March 2022. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 3/24/22. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician order dated 2/23/22 for oxygen at 3 liters per minute, continuous. A review of the Medication / Treatment Administration Records (MAR / TAR) for February and March 2022 failed to reveal any documentation of the oxygen being administered. A review of the nurse's notes revealed the following: On 3/1/22, 3/8/22, 3/14/22, 3/18/22, and 3/21/22 the oxygen was documented as not being used. On 2/24/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide complete dialysis care and services for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #32. The findings include: For Resident #32 (R32), the facility staff failed to ensure adequate communication and collaboration for care with the resident's hemodialysis center. A review of R32's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 2/15/22 for hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. R32's comprehensive care plan revised on 2/26/22 failed to document information regarding communication with the dialysis center. A review of R32's dialysis communication book (a book that contained communication forms to be completed by facility staff, sent with the resident to dialysis, and returned with documented communication from the dialysis center) failed to reveal any documented communication for the following dialysis days: 3/10/23, 3/13/23, 3/17/23, 3/22/23, 3/27/23, 3/29/23, 3/31/23 and 4/5/23. On 4/11/23 at 3:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide RN (registered nurse) coverage on three of 30 days reviewed. The findings include: A review of facility nursing schedules revealed there was no RN coverage on 3/11/23, 4/8/23 and 4/9/23. On 4/11/23 at 4:14 p.m., an interview was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #2, the director of nursing. ASM #2 stated the facility is required to have eight hours of RN coverage each day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. ASM #2 stated there was only one other RN besides her, but she recently hired another RN. On 4/11/23 at 5:18 p.m., ASM #1, the administrator, and ASM #2 were made aware of the above concern. The facility policy titled, Department Duty Hours - Nursing Services documented, 7. Registered nurse hours will be eight consecutive hours per day; 7 days a week.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that medications were available for administration for three of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #262, #14, and #37. The findings include: 1. For R262, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration on 12/28/2021. R262 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1), hypertension and congestive heart failure (2). The eMAR (electronic medication administration record) for R262 dated 12/1/2021-12/31/2021 documented in part, - Metoclopramide HCL Solution 5mg/ml (milligram per milliliter) Use 5mg intravenously three times a day for before meals. Start Date: 12/28/2021 0900 (9:00 a.m.). The eMAR documented a 9 in the administration area for 12/28/2021 at 9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. The eMAR chart codes documented in part, .9= Other/See Nurse Notes . - Diltiazem HCL tablet 30mg Give 1 tablet by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a monthly medication regimen review for three of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #25, #29, and #20. The findings include: 1. For Resident #25 (R25), the facility pharmacist did not complete a medication regimen review (MRR) in December 2022 or January 2023. A review of R25's clinical record failed to reveal evidence of an MRR in December 2022 and January 2023. On 4/11/23 at 5:07 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing, and ASM #4, the regional nurse consultant, were informed of these concerns. ASM #1 stated: We just got a pharmacist. She stated the facility had undergone a change of ownership on 12/1/22, and lost their pharmacist. She stated the facility was without a pharmacist until February 2023. She stated she would check to make sure there were no MRRs for this resident in December 2022 and January 2023. On 4/12/23 at 9:24 a.m., ASM #1 stated: I couldn't find anything regarding a pharmacist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence infection tracking for 9 of 12 months reviewed. The findings include: The facility staff failed to evidence infection tracking for 4/1/2022 through 12/31/2022. On 4/11/2023 at approximately 11:30 a.m., a request was made to ASM (administrative staff member) #2, the director of nursing/infection preventionist, for the facility infection tracking logs for the past 12 months. On 4/12/2023 at approximately 8:40 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 provided a binder with infection tracking from 1/1/2023 through the present. LPN #2 stated that they were looking for the rest of the logs in the previous director of nursing's office files. On 4/12/2023 at 10:10 a.m., ASM #2 stated that they did not have any other tracking logs to provide. ASM #2 stated that the logs they had were the ones they had completed since they started working at the facility a few months back. ASM #2 stated that they were notified of new infections in their morning meetings, in chart reviews, and lab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to evidence clinical documentation was sent to the receiving facility at the time of resident discharge for three of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #23, #25, and #44. The findings include: 1. For Resident #23 (R23), the facility staff failed to evidence required information regarding the resident's clinical status, including a medication list and care plan goals, to the receiving facility when the resident was discharged to the hospital on 2/25/23. A review of R23's clinical record revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital on 2/25/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal evidence that the facility provided the receiving hospital with a medication list or care plan goals at the time of the discharge. The resident's E-Interact form dated 2/25/23 did not evidence that the resident's medication list and care plan goals were sent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to evidence written notification to the resident representative (RR), the resident and/or the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a resident's discharge for three of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #23, #25, and #44. The findings include: 1. For Resident #23 (R23), the facility staff failed to evidence written notification to the RR, resident and ombudsman when the resident was discharged to the hospital on 2/25/23. A review of R23's clinical record revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital on 2/25/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal evidence that the facility notified the RR, resident and ombudsman in writing of the discharge. On 4/11/23 at 3:55 p.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2, the unit manager, was interviewed. She stated when a resident is discharged to the hospital, the nurses are not responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to evidence that a bed hold notice was provided to the resident and/or resident representative at the time of transfer to the hospital, for two of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #23 and #25. The findings include: 1. For Resident #23 (R23), the facility staff failed to evidence bed hold notification was provided to the resident when the resident was discharged to the hospital on 2/25/23. A review of R23's clinical record revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital on 2/25/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal evidence that the facility provided the required bed hold notification to the resident at the time of discharge. The resident's E-Interact form dated 2/25/23 did not evidence that the bed hold notification was issued to the resident. On 4/11/23 at 3:55 p.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2, the unit manager, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a resident or the resident representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #210. The findings include: For Resident #210 (R210), the facility staff failed to provide the resident or the representative a summary of the baseline care plan. R210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of R210's clinical record, including the baseline care plan dated 4/1/23 and progress notes for April 2023, failed to reveal the facility staff provided R210 or the resident's representative, a summary of the baseline care plan. On 4/11/23 at 4:28 p.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #1, the social services director. OSM #1 stated a care conference is held with residents and/or their representatives within 72 hours of admission. OSM #1 stated at the care conference, she offers residents and their families a summary of the baseline care plan. OSM #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #34 and #44. The findings include: 1. For Resident #34 (R34), the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan for bed rail use. A review of R34's clinical record revealed a side rail (bed rail) evaluation dated 11/17/22 that documented bilateral quarter side rails was recommended to assist with bed mobility. A review of R34's comprehensive care plan dated 12/7/22 failed to reveal documentation regarding bed rails. On 4/10/23 at 4:43 p.m., R34 was observed lying in bed with bilateral quarter bed rails in the upright position. On 4/11/23 at 3:12 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2. LPN #2 stated the purpose of the care plan is, Where everybody can see them and go off with what's going on with the resident. LPN #2 stated residents' care plans should be reviewed and revised to include bed rails, So everybody can see what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide smoking supervision for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #33. The findings include: For Resident #33 (R33), on 4/10/23, the facility staff failed to provide a smoking apron per the resident's safe smoking assessment. R33 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Huntington Disease (1). On 4/10/23 at 2:18 p.m. and 3:53 p.m., R33 was sitting in a wheelchair outside on the smoking area patio. R33 had a lit cigarette in hand. R33 was not wearing a smoking apron at either observation. The resident was supervised per facility policy. A review of R33's safe smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed, in part: 1. Is the resident a safe smoker? b. Safe to smoke with supervision. A review of R33's care plan dated 4/8/23 revealed, in part: .If resident is going to smoke cigarettes resident will need to utilize smoking apron. On 4/11/23 at 3:55 p.m., LPN (licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services for pain management in a timely manner for one of 32 residents in the survey sample; Resident #10. The findings include: For Resident #10, the facility staff failed to address the resident's complaint of pain on 4/10/23 at 4:10 PM. On the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set), an admission / 5-Day MDS assessment, dated 3/15/23, Resident #10 was coded as being cognitively intact in ability to make daily life decisions. On 4/10/23 at 4:10 PM Resident #10 was observed and the resident requested something for pain from this surveyor. The resident's facial expression reflected pain and/or discomfort. At that time, RN #1 (Registered Nurse) was notified of the resident's complaint of pain and request for pain medication RN #1 stated that they did not know where the resident's assigned nurse was. On 4/10/23 at 4:25 PM a follow up interview was conducted with Resident #10. When asked if anyone had come to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed implement bed rail requirements for two of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #29 and #34. The findings include: 1. For Resident #29 (R29), the facility staff failed to review with the resident (and/or resident's representative) the risks and benefits of, and obtain consent for, the use of bed rails. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/13/23, R29 was coded as requiring the extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility and transfers. On 4/10/23 at 12:47 p.m. and 3:11 p.m., and on 4/11/23 at 9:18 a.m., R29 was sitting up in bed. At all three observations, bilateral bed rails (quarter rails) were up. A review of R29's physician orders revealed the following: 2/24/21 Patient is required (sic) bilateral 1/4 side rails to assist with repositioning. Further review of R29's clinical record failed to reveal an assessment for the use of bed rails, education regarding the risks and benefits…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide sufficient staffing for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #34. The findings include: For Resident #34 (R34), the facility staff failed to administer the medication gabapentin (1) per the physician's order on 3/28/23 and 3/29/23 because there was only one nurse in the facility and two nurses were required to obtain the medication from the facility Omnicell (a machine of medications that are maintained in the facility in case a specific medication for a specific resident is not available). A review of R34's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/2/23 for gabapentin 100mg (milligrams)- two capsules every eight hours for neuropathy. A review of R34's March 2023 MAR (medication administration record) failed to reveal evidence that R34 was administered gabapentin on 3/28/23 at 10:00 p.m. and 3/29/23 at 6:00 a.m. Nurses' notes dated 3/28/23 and 3/29/23 documented, Awaiting delivery from pharmacy. A review of the facility Omnicell list revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow the published menu for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #23. The findings include: For Resident #23 (R23), the facility staff failed to provide the resident with the items on the lunch menu on 4/10/23. On 4/10/23 at 12:31 p.m., R23 was sitting in a wheelchair, with a tray of food on the overbed table that was in front of the resident. The tray did not contain any chocolate pudding. A review of the meal ticket for R23 for this meal included that the resident should get chocolate pudding. On 4/10/23 at 12:34 p.m., OSM #7, a cook, evaluated the items on R23's tray. OSM #7 stated: No, this is not right. [R23] should have chocolate pudding. Somebody substituted applesauce instead, but there should be chocolate pudding on the tray. On 4/10/23 at 2:50 p.m., OSM #8, the dining services manager, was interviewed. OSM #8 stated the dietary aide who stands on the side of the tray line with the trays, condiments, silverware, and cold items, is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to serve food at the physician-ordered consistency for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #23. The findings include: For Resident #23 (R23), the facility staff failed to serve pureed spinach at lunch on 4/10/23. On 4/10/23 at 12:31 p.m., R23 was sitting in a wheelchair, with a tray of food on the overbed table in front of the resident. The tray contained pureed meat and pasta. The tray also contained a serving of spinach, which was not pureed. Leaves and stems were visible in the serving cup. On 4/10/23 at 12:34 p.m., OSM #7, a cook, evaluated the items on R23's tray. OSM #7 stated: No, this is not right. That spinach is not pureed. A review of R23's physician orders revealed the following: 3/7/23 Regular diet. Puree texture. On 4/10/23 at 2:50 p.m., OSM #8, the dining services manager, was interviewed. OSM #8 stated the spinach had not been pureed enough at the lunch meal that day. She stated the spinach had been run through the food processor, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to serve food according to a resident's preference for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #23. The findings include: For Resident #23 (R23), the facility staff served chicken, a documented dislike, to the resident at lunch on 4/10/23 On 4/10/23 at 12:31 p.m., R23 was sitting in a wheelchair, with a tray of food on the overbed table that was in front of the resident. The tray contained a serving of chicken and pasta. A review of the meal ticket for R23 stated in two places that R23 disliked chicken. R23's family member was sitting beside the resident. The family member stated: We keep telling them she does not like chicken. She never has. But they keep giving it to her. On 4/10/23 at 12:34 p.m., OSM #7, a cook, evaluated the items on R23's tray. OSM #7 stated: I am so sorry. This is not right. We should not have put chicken on the tray. I know (R23) doesn't like chicken. On 4/10/23 at 2:50 p.m., OSM #8, the dining services manager, was interviewed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchen. The findings include: On 4/10/23, a facility dietary staff member was standing at the end of the tray line during lunch service. At the time of the observation, the employee, who had a full beard, was not wearing a beard guard. On 4/10/23 at 12:25 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #6 was standing in the kitchen at the end of the steam table line as lunch trays were being served. OSM #6 had a full beard and mustache. OSM #6 was not wearing a beard guard. OSM #6 stated: But it's my day off. I just dropped something off for them. OSM #8, the dining services manager was serving lunch trays. OSM #8 stated: Yes, he is only here for a few minutes. It's his day off. When asked if anyone in the kitchen is supposed to wear a hair net and/or beard guard when in proximity to the tray line, OSM #8 stated: Yes. That is true. On 4/10/23 at 2:50 p.m., OSM #8 was interviewed. She stated OSM #6 had come to the facility at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide abuse training for one of one CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed. The findings include: The facility staff failed to evidence abuse training was provided to CNA #3, who was hired on 9/12/88. On 4/12/23 at 1:39 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, and ASM #2, the director of nursing, were made aware of the above concern. On 4/13/23 at 12:22 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #4, the human resources manager, stated she could not provide evidence that CNA #3 was provided abuse training. OSM #4 stated the facility uses an online training program and the program changed when the facility was sold in December 2022. OSM #4 stated she sets up the training program then employees receive automatic notifications of certain trainings that are due. OSM #4 stated abuse training is one of the required trainings.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide infection control training for one of one CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed. The findings include: The facility staff failed to evidence infection control training was provided to CNA #3, who was hired on 9/12/88. On 4/12/23 at 1:39 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, and ASM #2, the director of nursing, were made aware of the above concern. On 4/13/23 at 12:22 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #4, the human resources manager, stated she could not provide evidence that CNA #3 was provided infection control training. OSM #4 stated the facility uses an online training program and the program changed when the facility was sold in December 2022. OSM #4 stated she sets up the training program then employees receive automatic notifications of certain trainings that are due. OSM #4 stated infection control training is one of the required trainings.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide 12 hours of annual training for one of one CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed. The findings include: The facility staff failed to evidence 12 hours of annual training was provided to CNA #3, who was hired on 9/12/88. On 4/13/23 at 12:22 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #4, the human resources manager, stated she could not provide evidence that CNA #3 was provided 12 hours of annual training. OSM #4 stated the facility uses an online training program and the program changed when the facility was sold in December 2022. OSM #4 stated she sets up the training program then employees receive automatic notifications of certain trainings that are due. OSM #4 stated she did not know who was responsible for ensuring CNAs receive 12 hours of annual training. On 4/12/23 at 1:39 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, and ASM #2, the director of nursing, were made aware of the above concern.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-09 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed ensure the required documentation and information was provided to the receiving provider, upon facility-initiated transfers for five of 35 residents in the survey sample. Residents #39, #18, #26, #13 and #32. The facility staff failed to evidence what if any required documentation was provided to the receiving facility for a facility-initiated transfers of Resident #39 on 8/2/2021, and Resident #18 on 6/18/2021. The staff failed to evidence the comprehensive care plan goals were provided to the receiving facility for a facility-initiated transfers of Resident #26 on 7/22/21, Resident #13 on 5/10/2021 and 5/26/2021, and Resident #32 on 7/14/21. The findings include: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to pneumonia (1) and end stage renal disease (2). Resident #39's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an ARD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 10. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #25, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral infarction (1), diabetes (2) and heart failure (3). Resident #25's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/4/2021, coded Resident #25 as scoring a 15 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15- being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section G coded Resident #25 requiring extensive assistance of two or more staff for bed mobility and transfers and total assistance of two or more persons for toileting. Section H coded Resident #25 having an indwelling catheter and always incontinent of bowel. Section J coded Resident #25 having pain occasionally. Section M coded Resident #25 being at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Section N coded Resident #25 receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program for three of 35 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 201, # 3, and # 16. The facility staff failed to assess and document the location of pain and failed to attempt and or provide non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a prn [as needed] pain medications to Resident #201, #3 and Resident #16, on multiple occasions during August and September 2021. The findings include: 1. Resident # 201 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: osteoarthritis [1], and chronic pain. Resident # 201's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/30/2021, coded Resident # 201 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to have a complete infection control program as evidenced by missing infection control surveillance for April, May and June 2021. The findings include: On 09/09/2021 at approximately 10:00 a.m., a review of the facility's infection control surveillance for the past six months was conducted. Review of the surveillance records failed to evidence infection control surveillance for April, May and June 2021. On 09/09/2021 at approximately 10:33 a.m., an interview was conducted with ASM [administrative staff member] # 1, administrator. When asked about the missing surveillance ASM # 1 stated, We don't have a full six months of surveillance, we're unable to locate them. When asked who was responsible for infection control ASM # 1 stated that it was [ASM # 2], director of nursing who started at the facility on 09/02/2021. On 09/09/2021 at 12:58 p.m. an interview was conducted with ASM # 3, regional nurse. When asked to describe the procedure for maintaining the infection control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide privacy for three of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #301, #33 and #47. Resident #301's urinary catheter bag was visible with urine in the bag from the hallway while the resident was in bed and was not covered with a privacy cover; Resident #33's protected health information was left open on the medication cart in the hallway and was visible to staff and or others passing by, during the medication administration observation; and facility staff failed to provide personal privacy for Resident #47 while she was receiving personal care on 9/7/21. The findings include: 1. On 9/7/2021 at approximately 12:47 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #301 in bed from the facility hallway. Resident #301 was observed lying in bed with a urinary catheter bag attached to the bedframe on the right side of the bed facing the hallway. Urine was observed in the catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for 2 of 35 residents in the survey sample; Residents #9 and #37. Resident #9's right and Resident #37's wheelchairs were not maintained in a condition of good repair. Resident #9's right wheelchair arm was observed with cracks in the vinyl material, and exposed foam in the cracks. The findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the diagnoses of but not limited to Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, lymphedema, high blood pressure, depression, dementia, heart failure, and osteoarthritis. The annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 6/22/21 coded Resident #9 as cognitively impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. The resident was coded as requiring total care for bathing, hygiene and toileting; extensive assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure written notification was provided to the ombudsman, the resident and the resident's representative (RP) for a facility/resident-initiated transfer for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Residents #32. The facility staff failed to evidence that the ombudsman was notified and Resident # 14 and resident's representative were provided written notification of a resident-initiated transfer on 07/14/2021 for Resident # 32. The findings included: Resident # 32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to: fractured clavicle [bone that connects the shoulder to the breastplate], and low blood pressure. Resident # 32's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/04/2021, coded Resident # 32 as scoring a seven [7] on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, seven - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. The nurse's note for Resident #…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide a bed hold policy to the resident or the resident's representative upon a transfer to the hospital for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 32. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #32 and or the resident's representative with a copy of the bed hold policy prior to and or at the time of transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. The findings included: Resident # 32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to: fractured clavicle [bone that connects the shoulder to the breastplate], and low blood pressure. Resident # 32's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/04/2021, coded Resident # 32 as scoring a seven [7] on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, seven - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for two of 35 residents in the survey sample; Residents #37 and #52. 1. The 8/10/21 quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #37 was not completed accurately regarding the coding of Section J1800 falls. The clinical record documented Resident #37 was found on the floor by staff on 6/8/21, and Section J1800 of the 8/10/21, quarterly MDS assessment coded the resident as having 0 falls, since admission/entry or reentry or the prior assessment. 2. The facility staff failed to accurately code Resident # 52's discharge status to community on the discharge MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 07/22/2021. Instead, the resident's discharge was coded as Acute hospital. The findings include: 1. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to stroke, dysphagia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 35 residents in the survey sample; Resident #9. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #9's comprehensive care plan was to include and address the use of side rails. The findings include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of but not limited to Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, lymphedema, high blood pressure, depression, dementia, heart failure, and osteoarthritis. The annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 6/22/21 coded Resident #9 as cognitively impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. The resident was coded as requiring total care for bathing, hygiene and toileting; extensive assistance for dressing, transfers and bed mobility; independent for eating; and as incontinent of bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure professional standards for the administration of pain medications for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 3. The facility staff failed to clarify physician orders for two prescribed as needed pain medications, Percocet and acetaminophen, to determine when and which medication should be administered. The findings include: Resident # 3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include but not limited to: spinal stenosis [3] and osteoarthritis Resident # 3's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARID (assessment reference date) of 06/10/2021, coded Resident # 3 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section J0300, J0400 and J0600 Pain Assessment Interview coded Resident # 3 as having frequent pain at a level of 4 [four] on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure physician ordered fluid restrictions were implemented and monitored per physicians orders for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 44. The facility staff failed to ensure the amount of fluid Resident #44 received was monitored and within the physician prescribed fluid restriction amount of 1500 ml (milliliters). The findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: congestive heart failure ( CHF - abnormal condition characterized by circulatory congestion and retention of salt and water by the kidneys) (1), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease -general term for chronic, nonreversible lung disease that is usually a combination of emphysema and chronic bronchitis) (2) and dementia (a progressive state of mental decline, especially memory function and judgement, often accompanied by disorientation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of a pressure injury for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #40. The facility staff failed to conduct a thorough initial assessment to include measurements of Resident #40's pressure injury upon discovery on 1/2/21, and failed to ensure ongoing assessments including measurements and staging until 2/1/2021. The findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: dementia (a progressive state of mental decline, especially memory function and judgement, often accompanied by disorientation.)(1), diabetes, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - general term for chronic, nonreversible lung disease that is usually a combination of emphysema and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide appropriate services, and equipment, to maintain or improve mobility per the physicians order for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #15. The staff failed to apply Resident #15's physician ordered resting left hand splint on 9/7/21 and 9/8/21. The findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (1) and psychotic disorder (2). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/6/21, Resident #15 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions, having scored eight out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). She was coded as requiring extensive assistance of staff for all activities of daily living. She was coded as having functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to the implement assistive device safety measures to ensure an environment free of accident hazards for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #32. The facility staff failed to implement Resident #32's fall mat on 9/07/21, 9/08/21, and the morning of 9/09/21, per the comprehensive plan of care. The findings include: Resident # 32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to: fractured clavicle [bone that connects the shoulder to the breastplate], low blood pressure, muscle weakness and low blood pressure. Resident # 32's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 08/04/2021, coded Resident # 32 as scoring a seven [7] on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, seven - being severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. On 09/07/2021 at 5:00 p.m., an observation of Resident # 32's room revealed Resident # 32 lying in bed. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and facility document review it was determined facility staff failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #301. The facility staff failed to obtain an informed consent prior to the use of bed rails for Resident #301. The findings include: On 9/7/2021 at approximately 12:47 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #301 in bed. Resident #301 was observed lying in bed with an upper side rail in place and up on the right side of the bed. Additional observations on 9/7/2021 at 2:18 p.m., and 9/7/2021 at 4:33 p.m. revealed Resident #301 in bed with the upper side rail in place and up on the right side of the bed. Resident #301 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to malignant neoplasm of the bladder (1) and paraplegia (2). Resident #301's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/2/2021, coded Resident #301 as scoring a 13 on the staff assessment for mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that two of 2 nurse aid records reviewed had received required annual competencies, (CNA [certified nursing assistant] #1 and CNA #2). CNA #1 was hired 9/12/1988 and CNA #2 hired 7/16/2019, and neither CNA had annual training and competency evaluations completed. The findings include: Upon entrance on 9/8/21 at approximately 11:45 AM, an Entrance Conference form was provided to the interim Administrator (ASM #1 - Administrative Staff Member). One document on this form was a request for a list of all current CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) staff who had been employed at the facility for longer than one year. The list provided contained 2 CNA's that had been employed longer than a year and was still employed at the facility (CNA #1 was hired 9/12/1988 and CNA #2 hired 7/16/2019). A request was made for both CNA's #1 and #2 annual training and competency evaluations. On 9/09/21 at 9:51 AM, in an interview with ASM #1, he stated that there were no competencies because of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined facility staff failed to remove and discard of expired medications in one of one facility medications rooms and failed to provide pharmacy services for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 101. 1. Expired Preservision eye vitamin mineral supplement soft gels with an expiration date of July 2021 were available for resident administration in the one facility medication room. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #101's physician ordered medication, Meropenem 500 mg (milligrams) every 8 hours for pneumonia for 10 days, was available and administered intravenously as prescribed on 1/11/2021 at 10:00 p.m. The findings include: 1. On 9/7/2021 at approximately 4:49 p.m., an inspection of the facility medication room was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3. An unopened bottle of 120 preservision eye vitamin mineral supplements was observed on the bottom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to secure medications properly on one of three facility medication carts, the medication cart on the Blue unit. The facility staff failed to lock the medication cart on the Blue unit when the cart was out of the line of sight of the nurse. The findings include: On 9/7/2021 at approximately 4:55 p.m., an observation was made of LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3 administering medications at the facility. LPN #3 placed the medication cart in the hallway against the wall between the resident rooms. LPN #3 was observed preparing medications, including two bottles containing eye drops to administer to a resident. On 9/7/2021 at 5:07 p.m., LPN #3 entered the residents room with the medications while leaving one bottle of eye drops on top of the medication cart. Another staff member was observed exiting the residents room at that time, passing beside the medication cart. On 9/7/2021 at 5:11 p.m., LPN #3 exited the residents room to obtain the bottle with the eye drops from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to serve food at temperatures that were palatable for meal enjoyment during the evening meal. The findings include: Observation was made of the kitchen during the evening meal tray line on 9/7/2021 at 4:45 p.m. The following foods were at the documented temperatures that were obtained by facility staff using a facility thermometer: Potato wedges - 181.1 degrees Mixed Vegetables - 202.6 Corn flake chicken - 157.4 Ground chicken - 181.1 Puree chicken - 199 Mashed potatoes - 201.2 Puree vegetables - 194 Baked chicken for renal diets - 171.5 Chicken gravy - 188 Cheese Ravioli - 171.3 Mechanical renal chicken - 182.3 Coffee was taken from under the steam table and placed on individual trays. The coffee was not temped prior to being placed on the trays. A test tray was prepared at the end of the tray line. The fourth hall cart was observed. All trays were distributed. At 5:50 p.m., the test tray was taken to the dining room where the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 101. Resident #101's January MAR (medication administration record) documented see nurses note on 1/27/21 and 1/28/21, beside the physician ordered medication Flovent. Review of the January 2021, nurses notes for Resident #101 failed to evidence any documentation related to the use of the Flovent. The findings include: Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: COVID, pneumonia (An infection in one or both of the lungs. Many germs, such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi, can cause pneumonia) (1), high blood pressure, history of breast cancer, anemia (condition in which the hemoglobin content of the blood is below normal limits) (2), depression and pancreatitis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance program. The findings include: On 09/09/2021 at approximately 11:00 a.m., a review of the facility's QAPI [quality assurance performance improving] Meeting sign-in sheets dated January 2021 through March 2021 failed to evidence the signature of the facility's medical director. On 09/09/2021 at approximately 11:28 a.m., an interview was conducted with ASM [administrative staff member] # 1, administrator, regarding the missing signature of the medical director for the date listed above. When asked about the missing signature of the facility's medical director ASM # 1 stated that they did not have any evidence that they had attended. No further information was provided by the end of the survey.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident # 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission of 07/22/2019 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to respiratory failure, shortness of breath and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [1]. Resident # 3's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/26/19, coded Resident # 3 as scoring a 12 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 12- being moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Resident # 3 was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs coded Resident # 3 for the use of oxygen. On 01/07/2020 at approximately 3:15 p.m., Resident # 3 was observed lying in bed receiving oxygen by nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator that was running. Observation of the oxygen flow meter on the oxygen concentrator revealed a flow rate of one-and-a-half liters per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs for two of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 3 and # 25. The facility staff failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of prn (as needed) pain medications [Oxycodone (1) and Acetaminophen] (2)] to Resident #3 on multiple dates in November and December 2019. The facility staff failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a prn (as needed) pain medication [Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen (2)] to Resident #25 on multiple dates during November, December 2019 and January 2020. The findings include: 1. Resident # 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission of 07/22/2019 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to lower back pain. Resident # 3's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation staff interview and review of facility documents it was determined the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings include: On 01/072020 at 12:25 p.m., an observation of the facility's kitchen was conducted with OSM [other staff member] # 2, dietary manager. Observation of the reach-in refrigerator in the facility's kitchen revealed the following: One 46-ounce carton of thickened lemon water with approximately half of the contents remaining. One 46-ounce carton of thickened orange juice with approximately three-quarters of the contents remaining. Further One 46-ounce carton of thickened cranberry juice with approximately three-quarters of the contents remaining. Further observation failed to evidence an open date or a use-by-date. One quart of honey thickened milk with most of the contents remaining. One quart of honey thickened milk with most of the contents remaining. Further observation of all items above failed to evidence any open dates or a use-by-dates. OSM # 2 immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices for four of 32 residents in the survey sample; Residents #41, #37, #47, #163, and #25. The facility staff failed to store Resident #41's nebulizer and Incentive spirometer in a manner to prevent infections. Resident #41's nebulizer mask and Incentive spirometer were observed uncovered on the residents over the bed table. The facility staff failed to prepare and administer medications to Resident #37, in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. RN (registered nurse) #1 was observed touching medications in a plastic medication cup with her ungloved finger. The facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices in the storage of a nebulizer for Resident #47, the storage of Resident #163's incentive spirometer and Resident #25's nebulizer and incentive spirometer to prevent infection. The findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain a resident's dignity for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 6. The facility staff failed to provide privacy for Resident # 6's catheter, collection bag and urine inside the collection bag was visible from the hallway. The findings include: Resident # 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: heart failure, stage 4 kidney disease and high cholesterol. Resident # 6's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/22/19, coded Resident # 6 as scoring a 14 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 14 - being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Resident # 6 was coded as requiring limited assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living. Section H Bladder and Bowel coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the resident representative and Ombudsman with the required written notification of a hospital transfer for one of 36 residents in the survey sample; Resident #65. The facility staff failed to evidence that a written notification of a hospital transfer for Resident #65 on 12/10/19, was provided to the resident representative and Ombudsman. The findings include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but are not limited to, brain cancer, aphasia, convulsions, epilepsy, obesity, alcohol abuse, and adult failure to thrive. Due to the short amount of time, the resident was in the facility prior to the hospital transfer the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment had not been completed. The admission nursing assessment and admission nursing note dated 12/9/19, documented the resident was alert and oriented to person, place and time. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a written bed hold notice upon a hospital transfer for 1 of 36 residents in the survey sample; Resident #65. The facility staff failed to evidence that a bed hold notice was provided upon Resident #65's hospital transfer on 12/10/19. The findings include: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but are not limited to, brain cancer, aphasia, convulsions, epilepsy, obesity, alcohol abuse, and adult failure to thrive. Due to the short amount of time, the resident was in the facility prior to the hospital transfer the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment had not been completed. The admission nursing assessment and admission nursing note dated 12/9/19, documented the resident was alert and oriented to person, place and time. A review of the clinical record revealed that the resident went to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for the use of an incentive spirometer [1] for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 163. The findings include: Resident # 163 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to high blood pressure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [2]. The most recent MDS (minimum data set), Resident # 163 was not due at the time of the survey. The facility's admission Data Collection sheet dated 01/03/2020 for Resident # 163 documented in part, Cognition: Alert, Oriented to Person. Under Communication it documented, Usually Understood and Understands. Under Respiratory, it documented, Special Treatments and Procedures: None per history and/or observation. On 01/07/20 at 1:49 p.m., at 2:43 p.m., and at 4:05 p.m., observations of Resident # 163's over-the-bed table revealed an incentive spirometer. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for six of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #47, 41, 61, 37, 3, and 25. The comprehensive care plan for Resident #47, failed to evidence documentation for as needed use of oxygen. The facility staff failed to include the use of an incentive spirometer when they developed Resident #41's comprehensive care plan for altered respiratory status, dated 1/7/20, and failed to develop the comprehensive care plan for care and services of the resident's disease process of diabetes. The facility staff failed to include an intervention of a scoop mattress on Resident #61's comprehensive care plan that the facility determined was a required intervention, after a fall on 12/29/19; and failed to follow the care plan for the use of fall mats after a fall on 12/29/19. The facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan, for two of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6 and Resident #25. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #6's comprehensive care plan to include hospice care and services and care of an indwelling catheter. The facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for Resident #25 to include the use of an incentive spirometer [1]. The findings include: 1. Resident # 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: heart failure, stage 4-kidney disease and high cholesterol. Resident # 6's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/22/19, coded Resident # 6 as scoring a 14 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 14 - being cognitively intact for making daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility documentation it was determined the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The facility staff failed to administer sliding scale insulin per the physician orders to Resident # 3. On 01/07/2020 at 7:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., and 01/08/2020 at 7:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. there was no documentation of the amount of insulin administered or the location of the injections. The findings include: Resident # 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission of 07/22/2019 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus with complications [1]. Resident # 3's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 09/26/19, coded Resident # 3 as scoring a 12 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 12- being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure environment free of accident hazards and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of 32 residents in the survey sample; Resident #61. The facility staff failed to implement fall interventions for Resident #61 after a fall on 12/29/19, fall mats and a scoop mattress were determined by the facility to be required interventions. Neither intervention had been implemented as of the survey date of 1/9/20. The findings include: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses include but are not limited to dementia with behaviors, panic disorder, thyroid disorder, restless leg, anxiety disorder, high blood pressure and delirium. The admission / 5-day MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/29/19 coded the resident as being severely impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. The resident was coded as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to ensure that two of four residents in the Medication Administration task (Residents #41 and #37) were free of medication errors of less than 5%. Out of 32 opportunities, five errors were observed, resulting in a medication error rate of 15.63%. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #41 was free of medication errors. Resident #41 was administered a medication that was not ordered for him and staff failed to administer ordered medications. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #37 was free of medication errors. Resident #37 was administered a partial dose of the blood pressure medication, Atenolol, and not the full dose that was ordered. The findings include: 1. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses included but are not limited to hydrocephalus, psychotic disorder, right kidney cancer with removal of kidney, cardiac defibrillator, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, bipolar disorder, spinal stenosis with fusion, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #37 was free significant medication errors. Resident #37 was not administered the correct dose of the blood pressure medication Atenolol (2). The findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses included but are not limited to encephalopathy, heart disease, dysphagia, diabetes, atrial flutter, abdominal aortic aneurysm, high blood pressure, cardiac pacemaker, and pneumonia. The admission / 5-day MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/17/19 coded the resident as significantly cognitively impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. The resident was coded as requiring total care for bathing and toileting; extensive assistance for transfers, dressing, and hygiene; was independent for eating; and was coded as incontinent of bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #43. The facility staff failed to maintain an accurate record documenting treatments performed for applying Nystatin (medication used to treat infection) powder topically twice daily and changing the wound vac (The vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy (also known as negative pressure wound therapy to assist with wound healing) dressing three times a week. The findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to osteomyelitis (1) and diabetes (2). Resident #43's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/17/2019, coded Resident #43 as scoring a 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15 - being cognitively intact for making…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-04-12 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to encode and transmit MDS (minimum data set) assessments to the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) system for seven of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #17, #16, #48, #47, #6, #49 and #46. The findings include: 1. For Resident #17 (R17), the facility staff failed to encode and transmit a discharge MDS assessment after the resident was discharged home on [DATE]. R17 discharged to home on [DATE]. A review of the resident's clinical record failed to reveal a discharge MDS assessment was encoded and transmitted. On 4/11/23 at 2:38 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1, the MDS coordinator. LPN #1 stated she began employment at the facility in September 2022 and the facility was behind on MDS assessments. LPN #1 stated she did not get to complete R17's discharge MDS assessment before the company was sold in December 2022 and the record did not pull over once the facility was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2021-09-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure 8 consecutive hours of RN (Registered Nurse) coverage for the facility on August 13, 14, and 15, 2021. The findings include: Upon entrance on 9/8/21 at approximately 11:45 AM, an Entrance Conference form was provided to the interim Administrator (ASM #1 - Administrative Staff Member). One document on this form was a request for the as-worked schedule for the last 30 days. A review of the as-worked schedule for a 30 day period of August 9, 2021 through September 8, 2021 revealed that there was no RN coverage on Friday 8/13/21, Saturday 8/14/21, and Sunday 8/15/21. On 9/9/21 at 8:52 AM an interview was conducted with OSM #5 (Other Staff Member) the staffing coordinator. When asked if she knew what the requirement was for RN coverage, OSM #5 stated she did not other than that there needed to be one in the building every day. When asked about RN coverage for the three above dates, OSM #5 stated, We did not have an RN at that time. I tried calling agencies for RN's and no one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-09-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to post a daily nurse staff posting that was complete and accurate from 8/7/12 through 9/8/21. The findings include: A review of the staff posting form revealed the form contained a row for each shift - day, evening and night shifts. For each shift, was a line with the word census under it, on which the facility was to document the resident census for that shift. On 9/7/21 at approximately 11:45 AM, upon entrance to the facility, the daily nurse posting was observed. The census data for each shift was not documented. On 9/8/21 at approximately 7:45 AM, upon entrance to the facility, the daily nurse posting was observed. The date posted was 8/8/21 (August, not September) and also did not contain any census data for each shift. At this time, the Administrator, (ASM [administrative staff member] #1), walked by and a copy of the daily census sheet was requested. He looked up at it and stated, That should have today's date on it. ASM #1 stated the facility was working on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-09-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the dumpster area in a sanitary manner. The findings include: Observation was made of the dumpster area on 9/8/2021 at 4:46 p.m. accompanied by OSM (other staff member) #6, the dietary manager in training. Around the dumpster were seven piles of used gloves. It could not be determined if it was one or two gloves on each pile. When asked whose responsibility it was for keeping the dumpster area clean, OSM #6 stated it's both dietary and housekeeping. The director of environmental services, OSM #7, was not available for interview. An interview was conducted with OSM #4 on 9/9/2021 at 10:34 a.m. When asked whose responsibility it was to keep the dumpster area clean, OSM #4 stated, he checks it every morning. Putting on gloves and picking up trash and mostly gloves. He stated, (name of OSM #7) the director of housekeeping, checks in in the evenings before she leaves. OSM #4 stated the dumpster had been emptied yesterday (9/8/2021) around noon. The facility policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Glenville Health & RehabGlenville, WV 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Highland Ridge Rehab CenterDublin, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5Mountain View Care CenterRipley, WV 1 of 5New Martinsville Health & RehabNew Martinsville, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Laurelhurst Post Acute & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Lynn Care CenterFront Royal, VA 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Tygart Valley Health & RehabilitationBelington, WV 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Blue Ridge Therapy ConnectionStuart, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
IDELS, SHIMONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 2 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 31%Other / private 7%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$413per resident / day
operating cost
$12,559per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$423per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495389. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-04-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next