Woodard Creek Health & Rehabilitation
3333 Ensign Road Northeast, Olympia, WA 98506 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 152 certified beds · (360) 493-4900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (98) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $189,638 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-29)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.6% | 14.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.8% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.5% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.4% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.2% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.2% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.6% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.9% | 82.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.2% | 19.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.0% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.05 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 328 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 153 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.8%CMS range 56.3–66.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 7.9%CMS range 5.8–10.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.6–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 104.4 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
98 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 85 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, report and thoroughly investigate allegation of abuse/neglect for 5 of 8 sample residents (Resident 78, 37, 94, 100, & 131) reviewed for abuse and 20 supplemental residents (Resident 25, 53, 143, 4, 144, 150, 31, 45, 86, 80, 148, 149, 112, 99, 110, 69, 116, 10, 44, & 38) whose reported allegations of potential abuse and neglect were identified upon review of the facility's grievance log. The allegations identified included verbal abuse, rough handling, residents being fearful of staff, lack of incontinence care, not responding to call lights for multiple hours or turning call lights off and leaving without providing the requested care, and failure to provide help with bathing and hygiene for up to a week. Although the facility was aware of these alleged issues, they were not identified, reported, or investigated as potential allegations of abuse or neglect. Instead, they were identified as care and call light concerns and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services were provided to prevent the development of avoidable pressure ulcers (PU), and to promote wound healing and prevent further decline of existing PUs for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 11 and 14) reviewed for pressure injuries. Specifically, the facility failed to thoroughly assess resident specific risk factors, develop and implement preventative measures, and timely identify, assess, monitor, treat, and notify the provider of newly developed PUs that direct care staff had knowledge of. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified wound development and/or deterioration, delayed treatment, and intervention. Resident 11 experienced harm when they developed an unstageable PU (full thickness skin loss, where the true depth is obscured by necrotic/dead tissue in the wound bed) to the right ear, resulting in pain and bleeding. Findings included . Resident 11 Resident 11 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who fell were assessed/evaluated for increased supervision and/or that a resident-specific fall prevention care plan was implemented for 1 of 3 residents (3) reviewed for falls. These failures put residents at risk for further injury, pain, and a decreased quality of life. Resident 3, who was assessed as a known high fall risk, was on blood thinning medication and had severe cognitive impairment, experienced harm when they had an unwitnessed and unsupervised fall, sustained a left hip fracture and experienced extreme pain as evidenced by the resident's grimacing and yelping when rolled to their left side.Findings included.Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and metabolic encephalopathy (A brain dysfunction caused by metabolic disturbances). The admission minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/31/2025, documented Resident 3 has severe cognitive impairment and is dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 8 residents (Resident 78, 131, 94 & 37) reviewed for abuse and neglect were free from verbal abuse or neglect. The facility failed to ensure there was adequate supervision and sufficient staff to meet the care needs of the residents. The facility's investigations substantiated verbal abuse involving Resident 78 and substantiated neglect involving Residents 131, 94, and 37. These failures subjected Resident 78 to potential psychosocial harm and resulted in delayed provision of necessary care and services for Residents 131, 94, and 37. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, undated, showed the facility was to recognize and respect that each resident had the right to be free from abuse and neglect. Neglect was defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers, to provide goods and services to a resident that was necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federally mandated program requiring all individuals to be screened for mental illness or intellectual disabilities before being admitted to a nursing facility) assessments were accurately completed upon or during admission to the facility for 3 of 6 residents (11, 40 & 130) reviewed for PASRR. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs.Findings included .Resident 11Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 01/04/2026, showed the resident was cognitively intact, had diagnosis of depression, and received antidepressant medication during the assessment period. A Level I PASRR, dated 12/31/2026, showed the resident had suspected indicators of serious mental illness of mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for 8 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 10, 11, 78, 24, 7, 1, 2 & 100) reviewed. Failure to develop and implement care plans that were individualized and accurately reflected resident care needs related to activities of daily living, advanced directives, vision, self-medication/medications at bedside, oxygen services/respiratory care, and fluid restrictions, placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and potential negative health outcomes.Findings Included . Resident 10Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 10's comprehensive care plan, initiated 11/08/2025, showed there was no direction to staff to assist the resident with nail care, or identification of who was responsible to provide it. The care plan also failed to identify the resident required podiatry services. Resident 11Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent (episodes of uncontrolled urination or bowel movements) residents were reviewed to evaluate if they were candidates for bowel or bladder retraining for continence, and/or provided appropriate incontinent care for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 37, 94, & 100) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. This failure placed residents at risk for neglect, lack of dignity, skin impairment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Bowel & Bladder Management Program, undated, showed the facility was to review residents for incontinence (no or insufficient voluntary control over urine or stool) on admission, readmission, annually, quarterly, or if a change occurred in the resident's status. For residents with identified incontinence, they were to initiate a care plan for incontinence and the interdisciplinary team would determine if the resident was appropriate for bowel and/or bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status by following orders for weights, closely monitoring resident's with weight loss identified prior to admission/accurately identifying weight loss, accurately documenting meal monitors and supplemental shake intake, and/or following consistent implementation of required meal assistance for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 100 & 94) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk for continued significant weight loss, malnutrition, impaired skin integrity, unidentified/unmonitored care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, undated, showed the interdisciplinary team would strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for the residents. Resident weights were to be taken on admission. If an inaccurate weight was suspected, the resident would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 11, 131 & 1) reviewed for oxygen therapy when facility staff failed to ensure oxygen-related treatments and services were implemented in accordance with physician orders and resident needs. This failure placed residents at risk for dry nares, nose bleeds, scabbing and/or decreased oxygen saturation levels and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 11 Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 04/06/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had diagnoses including asthma and chronic respiratory failure, and required oxygen therapy during the assessment period. On 05/17/2026 at 3:17 PM, Resident 11 was observed lying in bed receiving oxygen at 4 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. An empty refillable humidifier bottle was attached to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to meet residents' needs and provide care and services in a timely manner for residents residing on 4 of 4 units reviewed for sufficient staffing. Evidence of insufficient staffing included resident and family reports of excessive wait times for assistance and care, staff reports of insufficient time to complete assigned duties, facility records demonstrating prolonged response times to resident requests for assistance, and a pattern of resident grievances, including allegations of neglect related to delayed or unmet care needs. These failures resulted in delays in care and services and placed residents at risk for unmet needs, complications of medical conditions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Staffing Data Report (SDR, identifies areas of concern that require follow-up during survey)Review of the SDR showed the facility was triggered for the following staffing issues: A one-star…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) for pain management prior to receiving as needed pain medications for 6 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 24, 138, 2, 37, 100, and 11) reviewed for pain. This failure placed residents at risk for potential side effects, increased pain, and medication reliance. Findings included. A review of the facility policy, Pain Management, undated, documented Specific Procedures/Guidance for 9. Various strategies and modalities may be utilized to assist the resident in achieving optimal comfort. Such strategies and modalities may include, but are not limited to: a. Non-pharmacological interventions may be appropriate alone or in conjunction with medications. Some non-pharmacological interventions include: i. Environmental – adjusting the room temperature, smoothing the linens, providing a pressure-reducing mattress, repositioning, etc.; ii. Physical – ice packs, cool or warm compresses, baths,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for dialysis. This failure placed residents at risk of medical complications, risk for falls, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure) and end stage renal disease (kidney failure, requiring the blood to be filtered through a process called dialysis). The Medicare 5 Day Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 03/24/2026, showed Resident 2 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 2's April 2026 medication administration record, showed they had an as needed hydralazine (medication to lower blood pressure) order, from 04/04/2026 through 04/25/2026, for when systolic blood pressure (SBP, top number of blood pressure reading) was over 160, which could be given every 8 hours. This record showed it had only been given 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during meal preparation services for 1 of 1 kitchen, reviewed for food service safety. The failure to prevent cross contamination placed residents at risk of foodborne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), unsanitary conditions, and diminished quality of life.Findings included . On 05/19/2026 at 11:59 AM, Staff D, Dietary Aide, started dishing lunch meal plates. Staff D started plating, using utensils to pick up food and plate. On 05/19/2026 at 12:01 PM, Staff D touched the garlic bread and greens beans, to cut them up with gloved hands. Staff D continued to plate lunch meals, plating 12 more plates. On 05/19/2026 at 12:09 PM, Staff D touched the garlic bread, to cut it up, with gloved hands. Staff D continued to plate lunch meals, plating 7 more plates. On 05/19/2026 at 12:15 PM, Staff D touched the garlic bread and green beans, to cut them up, with gloved hands. Staff D continued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 85 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Administration failed to provide oversight and monitoring of facility personnel, systems and practices related to Abuse/Neglect and failed to ensure compliance for identifying, reporting, protecting and thoroughly investigating allegations of abuse/neglect. These failures resulted in residents experiencing verbal abuse and neglect and placed other residents at risk of unidentified abuse/neglect and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation related to CFR 483.12(2)-(4) F610, alleged violations-Investigate/Prevent/Correct.Findings included .The facility policy titled, Abuse, revised 10/20/2022, showed under the section titled Identification, staff were encouraged to identify, correct, and intervene in situations which abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation of resident property was more likely to occur. Immediately following ensuring the resident's safety, staff were to report any allegation or observation of abuse to their supervisor, director of nursing, administrator or facility leadership member. Under the section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ask residents if they had an Advanced Directives (AD) and attempt to obtain a copy or failed to notify residents of their right to formulate one for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 11) reviewed for ADs. This failure detracted from the resident's ability to make an informed decision regarding formulation of an AD and placed residents at risk for losing the right to have their medical preferences and choices honored regarding emergent and end-of-life care. Findings included .Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic health record showed no documentation that the resident was asked if they had an AD or that they were informed of their right to formulate one.On 05/18/2026 at 3:44 PM, documentation that Resident 11 was asked if they had an AD and/or were informed of their right to formulate one was requested from Staff A, Administrator, via email.On 05/18/2026 at 4:27 PM, Staff A, Administrator, responded in a email, I do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate grievances for 1 of 1 month, April 2026, that included sampled residents (Resident 139, 47, 25 & 80) reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk of unmet needs, personal loss and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of April 2026 Resident Council Meeting Minutes, on 05/18/2026, documented the following concerns: Resident 139 reported, that the CNAs are disrespectful, don't listen argue with the residents in regard to their care, they don't want to do their jobs, and the do it the way they want and not to the resident's needs. Resident 47 reported, CNAs keep taking her packages of wipes using them on her roommate. This brings up an infection control issue. Resident 25 reported, agency staff wearing ear buds, either listening to music or talking on their phone while on the floor and providing care for residents. Concerns with the morning shift coming in and being very loud first thing in the morning and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess 4 of 24 residents' Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) reviewed. Failure to ensure accurate assessments for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federally mandated program requiring all individuals to be screened for mental illness or intellectual disabilities before being admitted to a nursing facility) (Resident 4), weight loss (Resident 100), urinary incontinence (Resident 94), cognitive pattern assessments and formal pressure injury prediction tools (Resident 17) placed residents at risk for unidentified and or unmet care needs.Findings included. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- A mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a terrifying, shocking, or dangerous event.), Depression (A mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest.) , and anxiety disorder (a group of mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 4 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 17, 10, 11, & 119) reviewed. The failure to obtain, follow and/or clarify physicians' orders when indicated, only sign for those tasks completed, and to notify the physician/pharmacy of missed doses due to unavailable medications, resulted in medication errors and placed residents at risk for adverse side effects, ineffective treatment and adverse health outcomes.Findings included . Residents 17 Residents 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review showed the resident had 12/20/2025 orders for: Morphine sulfate 0.25 milliliters (ml) by mouth every four hours as needed for pain level of 1-4 out of 10, or air hunger Morphine sulfate 0.50 ml by mouth every four hours as needed for pain level of 5-10 out of 10, or air hunger. Review of the April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed on the following occasions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dependent resident's activities of daily living (ADLs) were followed related to nutrition and/or hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 100) reviewed for ADLs and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 30) reviewed for choices. These failures placed residents at risk for nutritional concerns, lack of dignity, poor hygiene, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), undated, showed the facility was to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for residents that were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently. Resident 100 Resident 100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of severe protein-calorie malnutrition (not getting enough protein and calories for body needs), neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies ((dementia, causes a decline in cognitive abilities which can interfere with daily life), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure skin conditions were assessed, monitored and treated, in accordance with physician orders, and as needed bowel care was provided for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 17, 78 & 10) reviewed for non-pressure skin and/or bowel management. The failure to initiate bowel care in accordance with physician's orders, and to assess, monitor and implement ordered treatments for non-pressure skin conditions, placed residents at risk for pain/discomfort, delayed wound healing, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Bowel Management Resident 78Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 04/10/2026, showed the resident was cognitively intact. On 05/17/2026 at 2:35 PM, Resident 78 said they had a lot of trouble with constipation. Review of Resident 78's physician orders showed the following as needed bowel care orders, dated 01/02/2026: Miralax…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards, including provision of nail care and podiatry services for 3 of 7 (Resident 78, 11 & 10) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Failure to provide timely toenail care placed the residents at risk for negative health outcomes. Findings included .Resident 78Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 04/10/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had a diagnosis of diabetes (condition defined by persistently high levels of sugar in the blood) and was independent with most activities of daily living. On 05/17/2026 at 2:29 PM, Resident 78 said no one had assisted her with trimming her toenails since she admitted to the facility and they needed to be cut. She indicated at home she sometimes had to go to a foot doctor to get her toenails cut because of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure falls were investigated and/or investigated thoroughly for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for hospitalization related to falls, or to ensure residents with mobility bars (a form of a side rail, used to assist residents with mobility while in bed) had the required components necessary to determine if they were safe and also assess to determine they were not being used as a restraint for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 100, 37, & 50) reviewed for bed rails/restraints. These failures placed residents at risk of falls, medical complications, injury, restraint, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . FALL INVESTIGATIONSReview of the facility's policy titled, Falls Protocols, undated, showed the facility was supposed to have an investigation by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for each fall, to identify the reason, any contributing factors, and/or the root cause of the fall. The staff would conduct a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate and manage dialysis (a procedure that filters the blood) care for 1 of 1 (Resident 2) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to maintain complete dialysis records, communicate essential dialysis information between the facility and dialysis center, update dialysis related care planning to reflect the resident's current treatment needs, monitor fluid restriction compliance, and assess and respond to abnormal blood pressure trends. As a result, Resident 2 experienced ongoing fluid management concerns, including presentation to dialysis treatments above prescribe dry weight and the need for additional dialysis treatments, placing the resident at risk for fluid overload, cardiovascular complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure) and end stage renal disease (kidney failure, requiring dialysis). The Medicare 5-Day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a diagnosis of dementia received appropriate care and services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 100) reviewed for dementia care. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet or unidentified care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of severe protein-calorie malnutrition (not getting enough protein and calories for body needs), neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (dementia, causes a decline in cognitive abilities which can interfere with daily life), and weakness. The Medicare 5 Day Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 03/17/2026, showed Resident 100 was severely cognitively impaired, and was dependent on staff for cares.Review of Resident 100's care plans on 05/18/2026, showed there was no dementia care plan, or other care plans that reviewed/assessed/planned interventions regarding the following:- Resident preferences with family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 24) reviewed for medications at the bedside and expired influenza vaccinations were properly disposed of for 1 of 1 medication rooms (Medication Room) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving compromised or ineffective medications, accidental ingestion of medication, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Medications at BedsideThe undated facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications and Treatments, documented Residents have the right to self-administer medications / treatments if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so.Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/13/2026, documented Resident 24 was cognitively intact.On 05/17/2026 at 3:21 PM, Resident 24 was observed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were complete, accurate and readily accessible and that residents personal identifiable information was protected for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 17) reviewed for Hospice services, 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for dialysis services, and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 142) reviewed for identifiable personal health information. These failures placed residents at risk for a loss of privacy, poor/impaired communication and coordination of care with Hospice and Dialysis center staff, and unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Findings included . Resident 17Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/14/2026, showed the resident had a terminal diagnosis and was on Hospice services during the assessment period. Review of Resident 17's electronic health record (EHR) showed there was no Hospice documentation present for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured effective communication, collaboration, and coordination of care occurred between the facility and the hospice provider for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 17) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to designate a member of their inter-disciplinary team (IDT) to be the liaison with hospice staff, to obtain and maintain a current copy of the coordinated hospice plan of care, and to have a system/documentation of what hospice staff had visited (e,g,, registered nurse, chaplain, certified nursing assistant, massage therapist), when they visited, and what care they provided. These failures detracted from staffs' ability to effectively collaborate, communicate and coordinate care with the Hospice provider, and placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services and/or unmet care needs.Findings included .Review of the facility's Hospice contract showed under Provision of Information, it documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%, by having an error rate of 23.5%, with 8 errors of 34 medication administration opportunities observed. This failure placed residents at risk of medication complications and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/2023, documented medications administered will be explained to the resident. Medication is administered within 60 minutes of the scheduled time. Once staff administered the medication, they will immediately record the administration in the medical record. On 01/21/2026 7:38 AM, a medication pass performed by Staff G, licensed practical nurse, with the following observations:<Resident 15> Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spina bifida (a condition where the spine does not fully close in utero) and diabetes mellitus. The admission minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete, accurate, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 3 of 4 sampled residents (1, 3, & 4), reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of having an incomplete medical record, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcoholic cirrhosis (scaring of the liver due to conditions such as long-term alcohol use), esophageal varices (enlarged veins in esophagus due to blocked blood flow in liver), and alcohol dependence. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 11/11/2025, documented Resident 1 has no cognitive impairment and is partial to moderately dependent on staff for assistance activities of daily living (ADLs).On 01/02/2026 11:05 AM, Resident 1 said they felt like staff did not understand the importance of monitoring weights and vital signs. Resident 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were offered the opportunity to participate in care conferences for 1 of 3 sampled residents (5) reviewed for care conferences. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, pain, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including failure to thrive, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and advanced kidney disease. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/30/2025, documented Resident 5 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for assistance with eating.Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, dated 12/16/2023, designated Resident 5's family member, Collateral Contact (CC5), as their decision maker, if the resident can no longer make decisions. On 01/16/2026 at 11:40 AM, CC5 said he was shocked the last time he saw Resident 5 because of the amount of weight the resident had lost.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that guided staff in providing care for 1 of 13 sampled residents (1) reviewed for care plans. The failure to establish care plans that were individualized placed residents at risk to receive inappropriate and inadequate care to meet their individualized needs.Findings included.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcoholic cirrhosis (scaring of the liver due to conditions such as long-term alcohol use), esophageal varices (enlarged veins in esophagus caused by blocked blood flow in liver), and alcohol dependence. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 11/11/2025, documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was partial to moderately dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living.Review of care plan, dated 10/24/2025, documented Resident 1 had cirrhosis of the liver. The staff would monitor for yellowing of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the efficacy for use of an indwelling urinary catheter (a small flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for 2 of 3 sampled residents (6 & 11), reviewed for catheter use. This failure placed the residents at increased risk of catheter associated urinary tract infections, pain, and urethral trauma.Findings included.<Resident 6>Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a left hip fracture and diabetes mellitus. The admission minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/13/2025, documented Resident 6 has moderate cognitive impairment and is partially/moderately dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living. The MDS documented the resident has an indwelling catheter.Review of a care plan, dated 10/07/2025, documented Resident 6 had an indwelling catheter related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - an enlargement of the prostate). Staff will change catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered, resulting in repeated medication omissions that constituted significant medication error for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed residents at risk for injury and adverse outcomes. Findings included.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcoholic cirrhosis (scaring of the liver due to conditions such as long-term alcohol use), esophageal varices (enlarged veins in esophagus due to blocked blood flow in liver), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD- patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity). The quarterly minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 11/11/2025, documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was partial to moderately dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living.On 01/02/2026 11:05 AM, Resident 1 said staff did not pass all of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned (putting on) appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) when entering enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) rooms, failed to sanitize equipment used in the EBP rooms, failed to have PPE readily accessible to rooms that required additional PPE to enter, and failed to promptly dispose of dirty linen and trash for 2 of 3 halls (Hall A and Hall B) observed. The facility also failed to implement a respiratory protection program (a key component of infection control interventions intended to mitigate the risk of spreading infection) when the facility failed to provide fit testing of N95 respirator masks, as part of their respiratory protection program, in a timely manner for 21 of 21 newly hired employees reviewed for infection prevention and control. This failure placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for exposure to cross contamination and transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with meals for intake for 2 of 5 residents (1 & 7) reviewed for nutrition and hydration. The facility failed to promptly identify weight loss and implement interventions to prevent further weight loss for 2 of 4 residents (5 & 7) sampled for weight loss. This failure placed residents at risk for impaired nutrition, impaired hydration, and a decline in health status.Findings include:Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and a stroke. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident 1 haf moderate cognitive impairment and requires assistance with meals.The care plan, dated 10/22/2025, documented Resident 1 had swallowing difficulties and requires 1:1 assistance at meals and cueing to eat. The care plan documented staff would encourage the resident to go to the dining room for meals.Review of the 'Eating History,' dated 12/04/2025 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure results of allegations/investigations were reported to the State Agency Hotline within 5 working days for 3 of 3 residents (2, 3, & 4) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for potential unmet needs and decreased quality of life. Findings include:Resident 2Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis and pneumonia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff with activities of daily living (ADLs).The facility investigation, dated 09/23/2025, documented an allegation staff did not change the resident's tube feeding and the resident was without food for an extended period. The 5-day follow-up investigation submitted to the State Agency was missing interviews of sample residents.Interviews of staff were requested on 12/11/2025 and 12/18/2025 and none were provided.Resident 3Resident 3 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor and intervene upon a change in the resident's respiratory status in accordance with standards of practice for 1 of 9 residents (2) reviewed for care and services. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and decreased quality of life.Findings include:Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis and pneumonia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff with activities of daily living.The care plan, dated 10/30/2025, documented Resident 2 was at elevated risk for pneumonia due to use of a chronic nasogastric tube (a tube going into the stomach that provides artificial feedings). The care plan documented staff would administer nebulizers as ordered and observe for signs and symptoms of pneumonia.On 12/11/2025 at 12:58 pm, Resident 2 was observed laying in their bed. The residents' breathing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations involving abuse were immediately reported, within two hours, to Law Enforcement for 1 of 1 sampled resident (4) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure residents leaving against medical advice (AMA) were logged and/or reported to the Adult Protective Services (APS) and/or the State Agency for 3 of 6 sampled residents (3, 5, & 6) reviewed for discharge. This failure placed residents at risk for potential abuse/neglect and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated 10/01/2021, documented an alleged violation of abuse will be reported immediately, but not later than two hours if the alleged violation involves abuse. All alleged violations involving abuse will be reported, by the facility Administrator, to law enforcement officials (if applicable).Reporting of Allegations to State AgencyResident 4Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate interventions to prevent elopements or act on an elopement for 2 of 3 residents (1, 5) reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to ensure discharges Against Medical Advice (AMA) were safe for 2 of 4 residents (3 & 6) reviewed for AMA discharges. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet needs, diminished quality of life, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included .ElopementResident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of blood clot in the lungs and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs). The admission minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/09/2025, documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was moderately dependent on staff for many activities of daily living (ADLs).The admission Nursing Collection Tool, dated 07/02/2025, documented Resident 1 wanted to leave AMA and just didn't want to be here. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure signs of psychosocial outcome related to allegations of abuse were monitored for 1 of 4 sampled residents (4) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinsonism syndrome (tremors, stiffness, slowness of movement, and difficulty maintaining balance) and chronic pain. The 5-day Medicare MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident 4 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for many ADLs.Review of Resident 4's care plan, dated 08/01/2025, documented Resident 4 suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (mental health problem that can occur after a traumatic event) due to a history of physical and emotional abuse (a sexual assault) while in a nursing facility as a child.Review of facility incident report, dated 08/01/2025, documented Resident 4 made an allegation of sexual abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents with discharge needs to ensure a timely discharge for 1 of 3 residents (1) reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to ensure discharge planning reflected the resident's discharge status for 1 of 3 residents (3) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, psychological distress, risk for re-hospitalization, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of blood clot in the lungs and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs). The admission minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/09/2025, documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was moderately dependent on staff for many activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of Resident 1's care plan, dated 07/03/2025, documented Resident 1 would be at the facility short…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 3 residents (2) reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to provide written bed hold notices at the time of a therapeutic leave for 1 of 1 sampled resident (3) reviewed for therapeutic leaves. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed, protection of resident rights during transfers, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Discharge SummaryThe facility policy, Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident For, dated 10/01/2021, documented a post-discharge plan is developed for each resident prior to his or her transfer or discharge. Nursing services and/or social services is responsible for preparing a discharge summary and post-discharge plan and completing a discharge note in the medical record.Resident 2Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and dysphasia. No minimum data set (MDS), an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected resident care needs for 2 of 13 sampled residents (2 & 4) reviewed for care plan revisions. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 2Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and dysphasia. No minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, was completed.Review of the care plan, dated 06/25/2025, documented Resident 2 was at risk for dehydration, weight loss, or malnutrition related to advanced age. Interventions included checking weights as ordered.Review of physician orders, dated 06/24/2025, documented Resident 2 required moderately thick liquids with thin water between meals, small bites of food and sips of water, and use of a chin tuck, swallowing twice with every bite and/or sip.The Diet Nutritional Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 sampled agency and facility (Staff I, J, K, L, M) reviewed for competency with mechanical lifts showed proficiency with the operation of mechanical lift transfers. This failure placed the residents at risk for falls and their associated injuries. Findings included . Staff L, facility staff, hired 04/01/2025, did not have documentation of training on the mechanical lifts in their personnel file. Staff J, facility staff, hired 04/01/2025, did not have documentation of training on the mechanical lift in their personnel files. Staff I, agency staff, hired 04/08/2025, did not have documentation of training on the mechanical lifts in their personnel file. Staff K, agency staff, hired 04/25/2025, did not have documentation of training on the mechanical lifts in their personnel file. Staff M, facility staff, hired 04/25/2025, did not have documentation of training on the mechanical lifts in their personnel file. On 06/30/2025 at 2:40 PM, Staff G, nursing assistant (NA), explained she used one staff with the standing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 sampled residents (6, 8, 9, 10) reviewed for infection control practices, received vaccinations for influenza and pneumonia. This failure placed the residents at risk of contracting pneumonia and influenza and potential complications associated with those illnesses. Findings included . <Resident 6> Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 6's medical record, showed no documentation the facility assessed the resident's vaccination history. The record lacked documentation the influenza or pneumococcal vaccine was offered. <Resident 8> Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 8's medical record, showed no documentation of the resident's vaccine history. <Resident 9> Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 9 received a dose of the Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) (used to prevent pneumococcal disease) on 06/24/2022. The clinical record did not show the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) vaccine was provided for 3 of 5 residents (6, 8, 10), reviewed for immunizations. The failure to provide the COVID-19 vaccination placed the resident at risk for contracting the COVID-19 virus and related complications. Findings included . <Resident 6> Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 6's medical record, showed no documentation or indication the facility assessed the resident's vaccination history. The record lacked documentation the COVID vaccine was indicated. <Resident 8 Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 8's medical record, showed no documentation of the resident's vaccine history including the COVID vaccine. <Resident 10> Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (any drug that affects the brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) were regularly monitored, documented on, had associated non-pharmacological interventions (non-medication interventions), that as needed psychotropic medications had end dates and limited to 14 days, and/or monthly pharmacist recommendations were acted upon timely, for 5 of 7 residents (Residents 9, 354, 91, 88 & 66) reviewed for unnecessary medication or hospice. This failure placed residents at risk of unnecessary medication usage, increase in side effects without intervention, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 05/04/2025, showed the resident was cognitively impaired, had diagnoses of bipolar and depressive disorders and received antipsychotic medication (drugs that work by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-24 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit required Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) data to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days of completion as required for 8 of 9 residents (Residents 75, 36, 7, 31, 6, 62, 74 & 19) reviewed for resident assessment. The failure to ensure MDS assessment and tracking records were completed and transmitted timely as required, placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, revised October 2023, showed Admission, Significant Change, Quarterly, and Annual MDS assessments must be completed no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD), and must be submitted/transmitted to the CMS database, within 14 days of the MDS completion date. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) for the above identified residents, showed no MDS data was present for MDS assessents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop, implement and/or ensure residents' comprehensive care plans accurately reflected care needs for 12 of 24 (Residents 9, 29, 33, 37, 90, 66, 57, 30, 79, 94, 91, & 88) residents reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 05/04/2025, showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, diagnoses of heart failure, and malnutrition, and received diuretic medication (increases urine production and helps the body eliminate excess fluid and salt) during the assessment period. Resident 9 had a 05/07/2025 order to apply ace wraps to the lower extremities in the morning and remove at bedtime. Review of the comprehensive care plan showed no nutrition care plan addressing the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed the resident was cognitively impaired and received greater than 51% of their calories via tube feeding. Review if the electronic health record (EHR) showed a 06/02/2025 order for nurses to change, date and initial Resident 37's tubefeeding syringe daily. Observation on 06/17/2025 at 9:34 AM, 06/23/2025 at 1:53 PM, and 06/24/2025 at 10:49 AM, showed Resident 37 had an undated /initialed 60 cubic centimeter (cc) syringe at bedside. Review of the June 2025 MAR showed the night shift nurse signed that the task was completed daily from 06/02/2025 - 06/23/2025. During an interview on 06/24/2025 at 10:57 AM, Staff B, DNS, observed Resident 37's 60 cc syrnge at bedside and confirmed it was undated/initialed. Staff B said it was the expectation that nurses only sign for tasks they completed. 3) Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accidents or hazards by creating a plan of care and implementing preventative measures and/or assessments for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 18, 91 & 94) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for falls, injuries, medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of stroke (when a portion of the brain is without blood flow for a period of time) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). The resident was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 18's electronic health record (EHR), showed the resident had a fall on 06/16/2025 at 7:30 PM, during a shower and was assisted to the floor. An x-ray was completed on 06/17/2025 which showed a fracture on the right hip. Resident 18 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation on 06/17/2025 and returned to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide care in a timely manner and complete activities of daily living (ADLs) as evidenced by information provided during resident interview for 16 of 38 residents (Residents 28, 55, 30, 79, 16, 87, 10, 66, 1, 39, 56, 254, 154, 33, 62, & 28) and 2 of 7 staff (Staff R & U) interviewed for sufficient staffing or resident council, for 3 of 3 resident council monthly meeting notes (March 2025, April 2025, & May 2025) reviewed, and review of 1 of 3 grievance logs (May 2025). These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, negative outcomes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Interviews> 1) On 06/16/2025 at 2:26 PM, Resident 39 said they could wait an hour with their light on, it happened quite often, and they kept track on the clock. 2) On 06/16/2025 at 11:41 AM, Resident 28 said it took 20 to 30 minutes for staff to respond, and at night they were short staffed. 3) On 06/17/2025 at 11:15 AM, Resident 55 said it usually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5%, by having an error rate of 15.38%, with 4 errors of 26 medication administration opportunities observed. This failure placed residents at risk of medication complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . On 06/17/2025 at 9:22 AM, Resident 20 was observed to be given 3 insulin medications late: 1. Insulin Deglu[DATE] units one time a day, due at 8:00 AM 2. Insulin Lispro 13 units two times a day, with instructions to give with breakfast and dinner, due at 8:00 AM 3. Insulin Lispro, on a sliding scale (dependent on what the blood glucose level was), 2 units, with instructions to give with each meal, due at 8:00 AM On 06/17/2025 at 9:23 AM, Resident 20 reported they already had breakfast. Resident 20's breakfast tray had already been removed from the room. On 06/18/2025 at 1:25 PM, Resident 46 was observed to be given 1 oral medication late: 1. Baclofen for muscle spasms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored or covered to prevent cross-contamination, that outdated or unlabled food was discarded, and/or refridgerator temperature logs were filled out and monitored for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed and from resident accessible refrigerators for 2 of 4 dining rooms (Country Kitchen & Bistro) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of eating expired/outdated food and/or food borne illnesses. Findings included . During an observation of the dietary service department on 06/16/2025 from 9:49 AM to 10:22 AM, the following was observed: <Kitchen's Walk-in Refrigerator> Observations of the walk-in refrigerator showed the following: 1. A large, uncovered metal bin of white rice. 2. A large, uncovered metal bin of brown gravy. On 06/16/2025 at 10:34 AM, Staff O, Food Service Supervisor, said the uncovered bins of rice and brown gravy had just been prepared and were in the refrigerator, unlidded, to cool down. <Kitchen's Refrigerator 3> Observation of Refrigerator 3 showed a container of peaches and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a dignified manner for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 9 & 90) reviewed for dignity. Failure to ensure staff to residents interaction occured in a respectful and dignified manner, residents clothing was changed daily and residents were assisted out of their day clothes prior to bed, placed residents at risk for diminished self-worth and decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 04/10/2025, showed the resident was cognitively intact and demonstrated verbal and physical behaviors directed toward others. On 06/23/2025 at 1:39 PM, Resident 90 was in the dining room and repeatedly called out Help me, please take me to my room. Staff Q, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), said, give me ten minutes. Resident 90 stated, That is too long. I am going to be on the floor; my body is killing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they informed and provided written information to residents on their right to formulate an advance directive (written instruction for the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated, such as a living will or durable power of attorney (POA) for health care) for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 91 & 94) reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed residents at risk for not having their choice of who to care for them when incapacitated, not having their health care wishes honored, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Medicare 5 Day Miminum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated [DATE], showed they were severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 91's electronic health record (EHR) showed no documentation of an advance directive or that the facility had offered the opportunity to formulate an advance directive. During a joint interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 22) reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. This failure placed residents and/or their representatives at risk for not having adequate information to make financial decisions related to the residents' stay in the facility. Findings included . The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, dated 03/28/2025, documented Resident 22 was not provided with a SNF ABN. On 06/20/2025 at 1:32 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said Resident 22 had not been provided with the SNF ABN and should have been. Reference (WAC) 388-97-0300 (4)(a-c)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency within 24 hours for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 39) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of incidents not being reported and at risk of abuse and neglect. Findings included . Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (an assessment tool), dated 04/28/2025, documented Resident 39 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene. On 06/16/2025 at 2:26 PM, Resident 39 said on 05/04/2025 there was a bad episode, staff didn't change their brief and they didn't come back. Resident 39 said it had been reported to the state and that Staff V, had said he would report it. Resident 39 did not want to discuss this further at this time. Review of the Incident Log (an incident tracking system) from 01/02/2025 through 06/13/2025 showed no entries for Resident 39. Review of the Grievance log for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to rule out abuse or neglect for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 91) reviewed for falls. Failure to conduct a thorough investigation placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, poor clinical outcomes and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 91 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The resident was able to make needs known. During an interview on 06/16/2025 at 12:55 PM, Resident 91 said they had a fall in their bathroom and had some small bruises on their arms. Review of the EHR showed a note from 06/01/2025 which stated the resident had a fall at 10:15 AM when the resident was found to have no footwear on and had attempted to transfer into the wheelchair from bed. Review of the facility provided incident log showed the resident had a fall on 05/21/2025, 05/22/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 9, 33, 54 & 79) reviewed for ADLs and choices. Failure to provide assistance with nail care and/or bathing to residents who were dependent on staff for provision of such care, placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, embarrassment, diminished self-image, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 05/04/2025, showed the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for ADLs, and decisions related to bathing were Very Important. On 06/17/2025 at 9:58 AM, Resident 9's representative said facility staff were supposed to trim their fingernails every Monday, but they were not doing it. Resident 9's representative held up their left hand and stated, See, look they are too long.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and their person-centered plan of care for 4 of 9 residents (Resident 90, 29, 33, and 88) reviewed for bowel management, and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 29) reviewed for fluid volume status. The failure to obtain and evaluate daily weights and ensure the provision of bowel care in accordance with physicians' orders and/or the facility bowel protocol, placed residents at risk for fluid volume overload, delays in treatment, unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 04/10/2025, showed the resident was cognitively intact. On 06/17/2025 at 11:34 AM, Resident 90 said constipation was occasionally a problem. Review of Resident 90's bowel record showed they had no bowel movement (BM) from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessment, monitoring, and documentation of identified pressure injuries (PIs/ injuries to the skin and the tissue below the skin that are due to pressure on the skin for a long time) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 9) reviewed for pressure injuries. The failure to routinely assess and monitor PI wound characteristics with measurements, wound bed tissue type, details of drainage, wound edges, peri-wound (area of skin surrounding the wound) and response to treatment, impaired staffs' ability to determine if the wound was responding to treatment and determine if it was improving or declining. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified wound decline, delays in treatment, prolonged wound healing, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, dated 10/01/2021, showed staff should promptly report any change in a resident's skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain range of motion for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 18 and 54) reviewed for positioning and mobility. These failures placed the residents at risk for decreased mobility, pain, discomfort and a decreased quality of life. <Resident 18> Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 18 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke (when a portion of the brain is without blood flow for a period), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and contracture of the right hand. The resident was able to make needs known. During an observation on 06/16/2025 at 2:45 PM, Resident 18 was laying in bed, the resident was unable to move their right arm/hand and had a washcloth positioned in their right palm. Review of the EHR showed a nursing task for NURSING REHAB/RESTORATIVE: Hand/Splint Care. Assist/Instruct the resident to wash their hands thoroughly with soap and warm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure significant weight loss was identified, the physician was notified, and nutritional interventions were evaluated for effectiveness for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Residents 28) reviewed for nutrition. These failures placed the resident at risk for continued weight loss, malnutrition, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of diabetes and kidney disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 04/28/2025, documented Resident 28 was moderately cognitively impaired and had a recent weight of 107 pounds in the last 30 days. It documented a weight loss of 5% or more in the previous month or a loss of 10% or more in the previous 6 months, and Resident 28 was not on a physician prescribed weight loss regimen. Resident 28 weighed 116.2 pounds (lbs) on 01/03/2025 and 100.2 lbs on 06/22/2025, which was a -13.77 %. This was a 16 lb loss in just over 5 months.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with Physician's orders and accepted professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 29, 10, & 91) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure continuous positive airway (CPAP, a form of non-invasive ventilation therapy used to facilitate breathing) orders were complete and in place, to include the prescribed pressure settings, checking, refilling and cleaning of the humidifier reservoir, and identifying what solution was to be used in the humidifier. Additionally, staff failed to ensure oxygen (O2) was administered in accordance with physicians' orders, and portable oxygen tanks were refilled and periodically checked to ensure they were not empty. These failures placed residents at risk for ineffective assisted ventilation, shortness of breath, decreased oxygen saturation and other respiratory complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from unnecessary medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 62 & 91) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure residents were provided non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs, treatments or strategies used to prevent, reduce, or manage symptoms without the use of medications) prior to the use of as needed pain medications. These failures placed residents at risk of taking unnecessary medications, avoidable medication side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 62 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including history of falling, humerus fracture (upper arm bone) and chronic pain. The resident was able to make needs known. During an interview on 06/16/2025 at 10:21 AM, Resident 62 said they had frequent pain and took as needed medication, which helped. Review of the electronic health record (EHR), showed a provider order, dated 05/01/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked/secured in the absence of a nurse for 1 of 5 carts observed (A wing medication cart), and proper labeling and storing of medications and expired medications/equipment were discarded timely for 3 of 3 carts reviewed (carts #2, #3, #5). These failures placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or inaccurate medications, medication diversion and potential harm. Findings included . <Expired Medications/Equipment and Storage > On 06/18/2025 at 11:11 AM, an observation of Emerald Cart #3 with Staff G Registered Nurse (RN), showed: - an open resident medication cup containing white pills labeled with a marker APAP 500mg and no expiration date labeled on the cup - a bottle of Ibuprofen 200mg tablets that expired in May 2025 - 4 bottles of anti-itch lotion for Residents 41, 19, 31 and 13 that expired May 2025 And Staff G said we cannot give this medication, and I will get them out of the cart. On 06/18/2025 at 11:29 AM, an observation of C Wing Cart #5 with Staff H,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a manner that conserved nutritive value and palatability for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 9, 71, 156 and 157) with pureed diet textures, to honor residents' preferences for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 158, 356, and 46) observed with identified preferences, and to ensure meals/beverages were appetizing and served at appropriate temperatures as evidenced by 7 resident interviews and test tray results. These failures placed resident at risk of dissatisfaction with meals, decreased intake, weight loss, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Interviews> On 06/17/2025 at 9:04 AM, Resident 44 said they wanted their meals hot, but by the time the meals reached the table they were cold. On 06/17/2025 at 8:44 AM, Resident 355 complained that facility food was often dried out or tasteless. On 06/16/2025 at 12:48 PM, Resident 15 said the food was horrible and it was not hot when received. On 06/16/2025 at 2:38 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents hearing needs were addressed and they had access to bariatric (treatment of obesity) equipment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for accommodation of needs. These failures placed resident at risk of diminished independent functioning and a loss of comfort. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/08/2024, documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment, weighed 475 pounds, and was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. <Hearing> On 12/03/2024 at 3:31 PM, Resident 1 said several complaints had been made about their hearing and there had been no resolution. The resident said he was told the facility could not send him out to an appointment. On 02/05/2025 at 3:06 PM, Resident 1 said they continued to have ear and hearing issues and could not get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for urinary care and urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection of the urine) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1) reviewed for care plans. The failure to establish individualized care plans, that accurately reflected assessed care needs and provided direction to staff, placed residents at risk to receive inappropriate and inadequate care to meet their individualized needs. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/08/2024, documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and required maximal assistance from staff with toileting. The Care plan, dated 01/02/2024, documented Resident 1 needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) due to deconditioning and poor activity intolerance. The Urine Analysis (a test to check for organisms in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment (document describing resident population and needs to determine staff and other resources necessary to competently care for residents) was updated to accurately determine and identify the resources needed for the facility residents who needed bariatric (treatment of residents' who experience morbid obesity) care. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The Facility Assessment, dated March 2024, documented the facility assessed all resident needs, developing an action plan to train and support nursing staff to care for the resident. The analysis categories included bariatrics and how it impacted over all staffing, training, and services were noted as evaluated. The assessment lacked any detail on how the facility would support residents who were considered bariatric. The assessment was not revised when concerns arose related to residents who were bariatric. On 12/03/2024 at 3:31 PM, Resident 1 said staff told the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure possible allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse/neglect investigations. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy, Abuse Prohibition and Prevention, dated 01/2024, documented a thorough investigation would be completed in response to a suspected or allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation and/or mistreatment. An investigation would include an assessment of the interactions and relationships between caregivers and the alleged victim (AV) and interviews with the AV, witnesses, and provider. A record review would be completed related to the alleged violation. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke-like symptoms, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)/an assessment tool, documented Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report to the state agency potential financial exploitation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for allegations of misappropriation. Failure to immediately report alleged abuse and/or neglect placed residents at risk for potential unidentified mistreatment and a poor quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy, Abuse Prohibition and Protection, dated 01/2024, documented staff will immediately report allegations to the Administrator and the State Agency. Allegations reportable to the Administrator and State Agency include misappropriation of resident property defined as deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of resident's belonging or money without the resident's consent. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), recurrent major depressive disorder, and general anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a personalized discharge plan based on each resident's identified needs, goals and preferences and implement it timely for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed residents at risk for delayed discharge, unmet care needs after discharge and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-accident traumatic injuries and fractures. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident 2 had no cognitive impairment and required set-up assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The care plan, dated 02/05/2024, documented the resident would improve in mobility prior to discharging home. On 08/02/2024 at 12:57 PM, Resident 2's family member (FM) said once admitted to the facility, staff did not explain what to expect while Resident 2 was admitted . The care conferences included staff who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for mood and behavior. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unidentified triggers, re-traumatization and unmet care needs. Findings included . The facility policy, Trauma Informed Care, dated 01/2022, documented staff would recognize the impact of trauma on recovery and establish standards for assessing the signs and symptoms of trauma. Staff would periodically assess and care plan resident-centered approaches to meet residents' emotional needs. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event), recurrent major depressive disorder, and general anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 5 of 26 sampled residents (Residents 90, 88, 62, 34 and 427) of 20 reviewed for medication management. The failure to follow, obtain, and/or clarify incomplete physician's orders when indicated, to sign for medication(s) that were administered, to document the reason and notify the provider when medications were held, placed residents at risk for medication errors, adverse side effects, delayed review of their medication regimen and unmet care needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 90 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 90's electronic health record (EHR) showed orders for: a) Propranolol (a blood pressure medication) twice daily, with direction to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 100 or Pulse (P) less than 55. b) Furosemide (a diuretic) daily, hold for a SBP less than 100 or P less than 55. c) Spironolactone (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Resident 161 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 161 was dependent on staff for bathing and decisions about bathing were Very important. On 05/21/2024 at 1:20 PM, Resident 161 said staff did not come on the days they were supposed to provide showers. The resident reported the previous Friday staff informed her they couldn't provide their shower because a nursing assistant called off. An ADL care plan (CP), dated 05/07/2024, showed Resident 161 was to be showered twice weekly. Review of Resident 161's March 2024 bathing record showed from 05/07/2024 - 05/29/2024 (23 days), no bathing was offered/provided. On 05/29/2024 at 12:11 PM, when asked how many baths/showers had been offered/provided to Resident 161 from 05/07/2024 - 05/29/2024, Staff B, stated, I don't see any. 3) Resident 93 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 93 was dependent on staff for bathing and decisions about bathing were Very…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain residents' highest practicable level of well-being for 9 of 11 residents (Residents 49, 62, 20, 76, 93, 90, 23, 34, and 50) reviewed for bowel management and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 88) reviewed for positioning. The failure to initiate bowel care in accordance with physician's orders, address changes in bowel habbits and to reposition residents at the frequency they were assessed to require, placed residents at risk for pain/discomfort, skin breakdown and unmet bowel care needs. Findings included . <Bowel Management> Review of the facility's Bowel Protocol policy, revised 08/2022, showed licensed staff would monitor residents' bowel movement (BM) report daily at the start of each shift. If a resident had no BM after nine shifts, nurses would administer: a) Miralax on the 10th shift. b) If no results from Miralax by the end of the 10th shift, Miralax would be administered again on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure timely acquiring, receiving, and administering of all drugs) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 90 & 76) reviewed for pharmacy services. Failure to ensure timely receipt and administration of ordered medications, resulted in residents missing several doses of ordered medications and placed them at risk for inadequate and/or ineffective treatment of underlying medical conditions, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated pharmacy services agreement showed facility staff were to re-order medications three to five days before the supply runs out. For new orders and admissions if the medication(s) were ordered by noon the medications would be delivered in the 4:00 -5:00 PM delivery window except for Saturdays and Sundays. If ordered after noon, but before 8:00 PM, the medication(s) would be delivered in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a kitchen environment which allowed each resident to receive nourishing, palatable, and well-balanced meals without cross contamination when reviewed for kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of lack of nutritional intake, avoidable weight loss, foodborne illness, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Tray line assembly started on 05/24/2024 at 11:55 AM. At 12:00 PM, Staff N, Cook, took the fish off the plate, and set it on the long 6 foot white cutting board on the steam table and cut it up into small pieces. Staff N then placed the fish back on plate. Staff N then changed her gloves. At 12:15 PM, Staff N opened door to small metal storage container (next to ice box, where fish was being held at temperature) with gloves on, shut the door and then grabbed a lemon with gloves on out of a container filled with more lemons and placed it on the plate. Staff N did not change gloves after touching environmental surfaces and before moving to next plate. At 12:16 PM, Staff N opened door to small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain dishwasher temperatures logs and maintain the temperature in required range, failed to discard expired or no Use By Date (UBD) food and beverages items, and failed to maintain and document refrigerator temperature logs for 8 of 8 facility refrigerators reviewed for food service. These failures placed residents at risk of food-borne illness, unsanitary conditions, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Refrigerator temperature logs> Review of the facility's refrigerator temperature logs, from 11/01/2023 through 05/27/2024, documented the Cooler/Freezer, Reach In refrigerator, Dairy refrigerator, Salad Bar, Montreal refrigerator, Bistro refrigerator, B wing refrigerator and C wing refrigerator had multiple missing entries and documented temperatures outside the acceptable parameters for cold food holding: Cooler/Freezer: Missing recorded temperatures on 12/23/2023, 01/11/2024 & 02/29/2024. Temperatures over cold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 93, 61, 161, 90, 22, 81 & 50) reviewed for activities of daily living and choices. The failure to identify and correct a system issue with the facility's Point of Care (a computer program) charting, caused staff to falsely document bathing and/or resident refusal of bathing that did not occur. These failures resulted resident medical records containing inaccurate documentation of bathing that was not provided and/or refusal of care that did not occur. This detracted from staffs' ability to investigate resident complaints about not receiving showers and placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Resident 93 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 04/04/2024, showed Resident 93 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for the provision of bathing. An activity of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff compliance with current infection control guidelines and standards of practice for correctly donning/doffing (to put on/to take off) personal protective equipment (PPE) for 2 of 2 dining observations reviewed for infection control. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of illness), transmission of diseases and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility policy titled PMJCC Isolation for Transmission Based Precautions revised 05/2024, documented In addition to Standard Precautions, use contact Precautions for patients/resident known or suspected to be infected or colonized with epidemiologically important microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the patient/resident (hand or skin-to-skin contact that occurs when performing patient-care activities that require touching the patient's/resident's dry skin) or indirect contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner that promoted the resident's dignity and quality of life when personal grooming was not provided for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 61 & 88) reviewed for dignity. This failure placed residents at risk for embarrassment, diminished self-worth, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, as assessment tool), dated 04/26/2024, documented Resident 61 was cognitively intact and needed supervision or touching assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) including personal hygiene. On 05/21/2024 at 10:16 AM, Resident 61 said she had asked the facility staff multiple times for an emery board, to file her nails and for a razor, to address facial hair on her chin. Resident 61 was observed with multiple small hairs on her chin. 2) Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure visual impaired/legally blind residents received reasonable accommodations for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 61) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 04/26/2024, documented Resident 61 was cognitively intact and was not able to walk or transfer independently. Resident 61's Vision Plan of Care, dated 04/20/2024, documented, Visual impairments secondary to blindness as evident by patient states she is legally blind. Plan of care included: -Will move around room eat, and meet dressing and toileting needs with assistance recommended by therapy from staff. -Activities and social events that do not require visual acuity. -Ensure eyeglasses are worn, clean and in good repair. -Provide large print materials. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain, provide, and/or assist with completing Advance Directives (ADs) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 42) reviewed for ADs. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . Resident 42 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 03/20/2024, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 42's hard chart or Electronic Health Record did not show documentation of an AD or a declination to formulate an AD. On 05/29/2024 at 12:24 PM, Staff F, Social Services Director (SSD), said AD's were obtained upon admission. Staff F said if the family did not have an AD, the facility would provide them with documentation and encourage the family to completed it and return it to the facility. Staff F said it was the responsibility of Social Services to provide and obtain AD's. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a visually impaired/legally blind resident's room was maintained in a safe and accommodating manor for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 61) reviewed for environment. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (as assessment tool), dated 04/26/2024, documented Resident 61 was cognitively intact and was not able to walk or transfer independently. Resident 61's Vision Plan of Care, dated 04/20/2024 documented. Visual impairments secondary to blindness as evident by patient states she is legally blind. Plan of care includes: -Will move around room eat, and meet dressing and toileting needs with assistance recommended by therapy from staff. -Arrange furniture in resident's room as desired and maintain clutter free environment to increase ability to move around room without injury.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured grievances were initiated, logged, addressed, and timely resolved in response to residents' verbal conveyance of concerns during resident council for 5 of 9 months (June 2023, August 2023, September 2023, October 2023 and November 2023) of resident council minutes reviewed. The failure to identify the initiate, log, investigate and timely resolve reported complaints/concerns, and inform residents of the findings and actions taken to correct the issues, placed residents at risk of feelings of frustration, unimportance, diminished self-worth, and quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's Resident Council policy, revised 05/2024, showed Activity and/or Social Service representatives will assist the resident council chairperson by recording minutes and following up on resident reported concerns/issues. The council minutes will be routed to the appropriate department leaders to be followed up on within one week. The grievances are shared with the Administrator and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete an assessment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 42) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility's policy entitled Physical Restraint, reviewed 06/2021, documented 2. If the nursing or therapy assessment indicates that the device or restraint can help meet one of the goals above, potential risks and benefits of use of the device or restraint are discussed with the resident/responsible party. The resident/responsible party signs a form stating s/he has been informed of the results of the assessment, the risks and benefits of the restraint, and consent for its use. The assessment and consent form are filed in the restraint section of the resident record. Resident 42 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 03/20/2024, documented the resident was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Sets (MDS- an assessment tool) accurately reflected residents' health status and/or care needs for 3 of 29 sample residents (Residents 62, 76 and 88) reviewed for assessments. The failure to accurately assess whether residents' had a terminal diagnosis, were on a physician ordered planned weight loss program, and accuaretley code dental issues, placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 62 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the resident was cognitively intact and had no obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth. On 05/22/2024 at 10:53 AM, Resident 62 complained she had teeth that were sensitive to hot and cold and stated, I have cracked upper and lower molars on the left side and my cap fell off my bottom right molar. Resident 62 said her dental issues were present prior to admission to the facility. On 05/24/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) [an assessment completed prior to admission into a skilled nursing facility to determine whether a resident with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness needed specialized mental health services] was completed accurately for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 42), reviewed for unnecessary medication review. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet mental health care needs. Findings included . The facility's policy entitled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, revised 05/2024, documents, It is the policy of Providence Mother [NAME] Care Center to ensure the receipt of a complete and accurate Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I from the referring hospital, physician or other referral source for all individuals who are seeking admission to the ministry. Resident 42 admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment accurately reflected the resident's mental health diagnoses for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 20) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary mental health services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . Resident 20 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/24/2023, showed the resident was cognitively intact, had a diagnoses of anxiety and depressive disorders, and received antidepressant and antianxiety medication during the assessment period. Resident 20's physician orders showed the following psychotropic medication ( medications that exert an effect on the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system) orders: mirtazapine (an antidepressant medication) daily for depression;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment and services in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 45) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed residents at risk for untreated pressure ulcers, pain, and a decreased quality of life. Findings include . Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 02/29/2024, indicated Resident 45 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 05/16/2024, showed an order to .apply Skin Prep [a protective substance applied to area surrounding wound to prepare and protect skin] to peri wound [area surrounding wound]. On 5/28/2024 at 11:44 AM, an observation of pressure ulcer treatment provided by Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Staff J, Charge Nurse, LPN, demonstrated that the step of applying Skin Prep to peri wound was not done. At 12:23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Intravenous (IV) access devices were assessed, and maintained/monitored in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 90 & 88) reviewed for IV therapy. The facility failed to provide Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC/ a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) care as ordered, to include changing needleless injection caps, weekly dressing changes and measuring of arm circumference and PICC external length. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure maintenance flushes and ongoing monitoring of a peripheral IV access sites. These failures placed residents at risk for loss of vascular access, infection, and other complications and negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's Peripherally inserted central catheter dressing change policy, revised 08/20/2023, showed PICC dressings, measurements…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured effective communication, collaboration, and coordination of care occurred between the facility and the hospice provider for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 76) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to designate a member of their inter-disciplinary team (IDT) to be the liaison with hospice staff, to obtain and maintain a current copy of the coordinated hospice plan of care, and to have a system/ documentation of what hospice staff had visited (e,g,, registered nurse, chaplain, certified nursing assistant, massage therapist), when they visited, and what care they provided. These failures detracted from staffs' ability to effectively collaborate, communicate and coordinate care with the Hospice provider, and placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's Hospice Coordination policy, revised 04/2023, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to log allegations of abuse and neglect, mistreatment by staff, untimely incontinence care, and misappropriation of property on the reporting log within five working days for 5 of 5 investigations involving 9 residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9) reviewed for reporting of alleged violations. This failure placed residents at risk for repeated incidents, unmet care needs and unidentified abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . <Neglect> Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS) and left below the knee amputation. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/01/2024, documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and chronic kidney disease. The significant change in status MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of neglect and misappropriation of property for 4 of 6 sampled residents (1, 2, 3 & 4) reviewed for investigating alleged violations. This failure placed residents at risk for not identifying corrective actions to prevent further neglect, misappropriation, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (The Purple Book), dated [DATE], All alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property must be thoroughly investigated. <Neglect> Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS) and left below the knee amputation. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when a resident was not monitored and timely interventions were not implemented after experiencing end of life and death of a roommate for 3 of 4 sampled residents (1, 2 & 3)) reviewed for medically related social services. This failure placed residents at risk of having unmet social service needs, psychosocial decline and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS) and left below the knee amputation. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 04/01/2024 documented Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The Care Plan, dated 06/23/2023, documented Resident 1 could have difficulty adjusting to change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$189,638 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $181,360 — penalty dated 2026-05-29
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2026-01-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WOODARD OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| LION 26 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| SABRINA 1818 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| SAESSY IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2025 |
| TATIRIQ IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2025 |
| ERICKSON, CHRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| IDELS, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| JONES, JILL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505387. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.