No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Glenville Health & Rehab

111 Fairground Road, Glenville, WV 26351 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 65 certified beds · (304) 462-5718 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (304) 462-5718 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$39,390 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $39,390 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-24)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
617 River St · (304) 364-8941 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
356 WV Highway 5 E · (304) 462-8300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
18 Foodland Plz · (304) 462-5463 · Call to confirm hours
Park
200 Cedar Creek Rd · (304) 462-8517 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.9%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.2%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.4%7.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%15.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.6%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.8%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.4%22.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.3%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.2%1.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.8%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission42.1%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.8%11.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.541.801.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.271.841.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.2%CMS range 22.9–44.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.2%CMS range 9.6–18.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge5.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 4.5–16.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
54.1%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 64.4 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment or services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The resident suffered actual physical harm when further avoidable facility acquired pressure ulcers developed. Resident identifier: #61 Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #61 Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE] with the following identified skin issues noted on the Nursing admission Evaluation dated 07/03/24: Resident #61 had a deep tissue injury measuring 5 centimeters (cm) X 4.5 cm to the left heel. Resident #61 had a pressure ulcer measuring 1 cm X 1.5 cm to the right side of the coccyx. A wound was also noted on the left-hand middle finger. On 08/24/24 a note identified a left heel pressure ulcer/injury or suspected deep tissue injury. This was identified as a new facility acquired unstageable. No size was documented. No description was identified. This area appeared to be the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to enusre they referred a resident with a newly evident mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for review. This was found to be true for three (3) of eight (8) residents sampled during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #3, #5, #12. Facility census: 63 Findings included: a) Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The resident had the following diagnoses on admission: -PARKINSON'S DISEASE WITHOUT DYSKINESIA, WITHOUT MENTION OF FLUCTUATIONS 07/25/25 Principal Diagnosis admission POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER, CHRONIC Medical Management 07/25/25 History During the stay at the facility, the resident had a new diagnosis of: -MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, SINGLE EPISODE, MODERATE 11/5/25 During Stay The MDS dated [DATE], had a primary diagnosis of Parkinson's. Other diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and depression were indicated on the MDS. The PASARR for the resident is dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected pre-admission diagnoses for four (2) of eight (8) resident reviewed for the category of PASARR, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifiers: #4, and #5, Facility Census: 63. a) Resident #5 This resident was first admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a re-admission date of 07/17/24. Upon admission, the resident had these diagnoses: -ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, UNSPECIFIED 3/4/2021 Principal Diagnosis admission -UNSPECIFIED CONVULSIONS 03/3/2021 admission -MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, SINGLE EPISODE, UNSPECIFIED 03/03/2021 admission The PASARR was completed on 03/01/21 in an acute care facility. The PASARR did not contain any of the above diagnoses. It is marked 'none' for current diagnoses. In summary, the PASARR should have been updated when the resident was admitted to the facility. This was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to revise residents care plan in a timely manner, following significant change in condition. This was found to be true for four (4) of 23 residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #25, #9, #5, #50. Facility census: 63. Findings Include: a) Resident # 25 Resident #25, is [AGE] years old who has capacity to make own medical decisions. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A trauma screening was performed on 01/14/26 by the Director of Social Services. To the question, Was care plan updated to reflect the resident's experiences, preferences, and cultural differences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization. A response of yes was marked. From the care plan: the resident reported trauma during their trauma screening related to childhood abuse, domestic violence, PTSD, substance abuse and rape. Goal was the residents past traumatic experiences will not cause the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which they had control was as free from accident hazards as possible in regards to bed safety and unsecured medication. This was random opportunity for discovery. Resident # 9, #52 and #6 . Facility census: 63. a)Resident #52 During an initial tour of the facility an observation completed on 04/13/26 at 12:16 PM, revealed Resident #6's bed had an approximate 12-inch gap between the mattress and head board. b) Resident #9 During an initial tour of the facility an observation completed on 04/13/26 at 12:30 PM, revealed Resident #9 was lying in bed with an approximate 12-inch gap between the mattress and head board. c) Resident #6 The observation noted Resident #52's bed. The bed had a large gap between the foot board and mattress. During an interview and tour on 04/13/26 at 1:10 PM, the Director of Nursing and Administrator verified the gaps between the mattress and the bed frame. They stated they would fix them immediately. A policy titled, Storage of Medication reads: Medications and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure qualified dietary staff carried out the functions of food and nutrition services. This had the potential to affect all of the residents receiving nutrition from the kitchen. Census: 63Findings include: An interview with Dietician #90 on 04/14/26 at 2:30pm confirmed that she works remotely as a consultant and does not come to the facility in person. A review of current credentials revealed the Dietary Manager was not certified as a manager for dietary services. An interview with Regional Dietary Manager and Administrator on 04/14/26 at approximately 3:00PM confirms there is not a Certified Dietary Manager overseeing food and nutrition services at this time and that the Dietician works remotely.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the menu met the residents' daily nutrition requirements. This had the potential to affect a majority of the residents getting nutrition from the kitchen. Census: 63. Findings included:A policy titled Director of Food and Nutrition Services Responsibilities states that food served will be attractive, palatable and meet the dietary needs of the individuals being served. The lunch menu for 04/13/26 consisted of homemade cream of potato soup, cornbread, jello, choice of milk and beverage of choice. The dietary guidelines provided by the Dietary Manager for 04/13/26 are as follows: Carbohydrates: Required: 16; Total for day: 12 Fruits and Vegetables: Required: 5; Total for day: 2.5 Meats and Proteins: Required: 6;Total for day: 5 In an interview with Dietician #90 on 04/14/26 at approximately 2:30 PM, she confirmed that the menu for 04/13/26 did not match the regional menu that ensures all nutritional requirements are met. An interview with the Regional Dietary Manager and Administrator at approximately 3:00 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored under sanitary conditions and that dishes were stored under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect a majority of residents receiving nutrition from the kitchen. Census: 63Findings include: a)A policy titled, Food Storage, contains the following: all foods should be covered, labeled and dated and routinely monitored to ensure they will be consumed by their use by dates. A policy titled, Cleaning Instructions: Microwave Oven, reads that the microwave oven interior should be cleaned after each use as needed. In the procedure section states to remove any food particles from the microwave oven interior with a clean, wet cloth and wipe the interior, including the ceiling, with hot sudsy water. A policy titled, General Food Preparation and Handling, states that all food service equipment should be cleaned, sanitized, air-dried and reassembled after each use. During the initial kitchen tour at 11:15 AM on 04/13/26, small ziploc bags of cheese in the walk in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy as related to an investigation of neglect for Resident #36. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #36. Census: 63.Findings include: a) Resident #36 A policy titled Grievances/Complaints reads, The Grievance Officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies, depending on the nature of the allegations. All alleged violations of neglect, abuse and/or misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated under guidelines for reporting abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property, as per state law. The grievance report for Resident #36 stated, Resident reported on 01/11/26 he had peed in the bed about 9:00bPM and did not get cleaned up until 3:00 AM and had call light on and reported staff turned off the light and left. In an interview with Administrator and Director of Nursing at approximately 12:00PM on 04/16/26, it was confirmed that this was an allegation of neglect and it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to identify a grievance as neglect and report that to the appropriate state agencies. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents. Census: 63Findings include: A policy titled Grievances/Complaints reads, The Grievance Officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies, depending on the nature of the allegations. All alleged violations of neglect, abuse and/or misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated under guidelines for reporting abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property, as per state law. The grievance report for Resident #36 stated, Resident reported on 01/11/26 he had peed in the bed about 9:00 PM and did not get cleaned up until 3:00 AM and had call light on and reported staff turned off the light and left. In an interview with Administrator and Director of Nursing at approximately 12:00PM on 04/16/26, it was confirmed that this was an allegation of neglect and it was not reported to the appropriate state agencies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a complaint of neglect for Resident #36. Resident identifier: #36. Facility Census: 63.Findings include: a) Resident #36 A policy titled Grievances/Complaints reads, The Grievance Officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies, depending on the nature of the allegations. All alleged violations of neglect, abuse and/or misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated under guidelines for reporting abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property, as per state law. The grievance policy also states, The Grievance Officer, Administrator and Staff will take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of resident rights while the alleged violation is being investigated.The Federal regulation 483.12(c)(1)-(4) require facilities to report allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries ofunknown origin/source and misappropriation of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to perform a comprehensive assessment following significant change in a resident with weight loss of over 18% in less than three (3) months. This was found to be true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #9. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This resident does not have capacity to make own medical decisions. The resident is age [AGE]. Upon admission to the facility, the resident weighed 228.6 lbs. On 04/01/2026, the resident weighed 186.4 lbs which is a -18.46% weight loss. Resident #9's orders pertaining to diet were: -Regular diet, *Regular texture, *Regular/Thin consistencyfortified food at lunch Diet Active 1/27/2026 -Multivitamin-Minerals Oral Tablet (Multiple Vitamins w/ Minerals)Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for wound healingPharmacy Active 01/31/2026-Vitamin D3 Ultra Potency Oral Tablet 1250…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurate regarding toileting schedule for Resident #48. This was true for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled for accidents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #48. Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #48 Resident #48's care plan reads, Toileting schedule: toilet resident upon rising, before and after meals and at bedtime. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] marked 'no' for both the urinary toileting program and the bowel toileting program. An interview with MDS coordinator #61 and the Director of Nursing (DON) at 11:45 AM on 04/15/26 confirmed that the care plan stated Resident #48 had a toileting schedule, but the MDS was marked as having no schedule.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 received Oxygen therapy as ordered by physician. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents sampled for Oxygen during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Census: 63 Resident identifier: #6 Findings include: a) Resident #6 On 04/14/2026 at 2:00 PM, state surveyors observed Resident #6 in the therapy gym without oxygen. At 2:41 PM, Resident #6 was still in the therapy gym without oxygen. According to Resident #6's orders and care plan, the resident was to receive five (5) liters/minute at 28% humidification via tracheostomy mask. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Director of Rehab at 2:41 PM confirmed the resident was without oxygen and had been without oxygen during therapy. An interview with the DON at 4:00 PM confirmed the resident should have oxygen per current documented orders.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice in regard to monitoring pain levels. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for pain during the long-term survey process. Resident Identifier: #42. Facility census: 63.Findings included: a) Resident #42During an interview on 04/13/26, at 1:18 PM, Resident #42 reported experiencing constant pain. She stated that she was only provided with Tylenol, which she felt was ineffective most of the time. Additionally, she mentioned that she remained awake and wandered throughout the night due to the severity of her discomfort. Medical record review revealed Resident #42's Physician orders for pain management:-Tylenol 8-hour Arthritis Pain Oral Tablet Extended Release 650 MG (Acetaminophen): Give 650 MG by mouth 3 times a day for mild to moderate pain. With supplemental documentation for the pain level. The start date was 07/07/2025. -Monitor for pain every shift. Start date 09/03/2025.A continued review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to work to identify a resident's past history of trauma, and/or triggers which may cause re-traumatization. This was found to be true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for PTSD during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #25. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #25 This [AGE] year old resident has the capacity to make own medical decisions. Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This surveyor attempted three times to interview the resident, but each time the resident was asleep. A review of the resident's medical record documented a trauma screening was performed on 01/14/26 by the Director of Social Services. To the question, Was care plan updated to reflect the resident's experiences, preferences, and cultural differences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization. A response of yes was marked. From the care plan:the resident reported drauma during their trauma…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident the right to be treated with dignity and respect when passing meal trays. This was true for four (4) of thirty-three (33) residents observed in the dining room. Resident identifiers: #9, #28, #31 and #61. Facility census: 63 Findings include: a) On 10/23/24 at 12:05 PM during observation of the noon meal tray pass in the dining room there were five (5) residents observed at one table. Resident #5 received her lunch at 12:05 PM. The remaining four (4) residents were not served their tray and staff members continued to serve residents at the other three (3) tables. At 12:08 PM Resident #31 asked, Can we have our food now? The staff member walking past responded, We are getting it. At 12:12 PM staff members began serving the remaining residents sitting at this table. The last meal was served to Resident #61 at 12:16 PM. This left the four (4) residents sitting at the table for seven to eleven (7-11) minutes with Resident #5 while she ate her meal. On 10/23/24 at 12:17 PM Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to examine the results of the most recent survey. This had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) An observation of the survey book in the facility revealed the last survey results that were in the survey book were from the annual inspection in November 2022. On 10/24/24 at 1:00 PM the administrator said one of the residents in the facility keeps getting papers out of the book. A review of the facility's survey history revealed complaints investigated in February 2023, September 2023 and February 2024 all had citations associated with them.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a home like environment. This was true for four (4) of nine (9) rooms observed. Room identifiers: #104, #108, #110, #213. Facility Census: 63 Findings included: a) room [ROOM NUMBER] On 10/23/24 at 1:30 PM observation of nine (9) rooms in the facility found that four (4) rooms did not have a homelike environment. room [ROOM NUMBER] had two (2) residents residing in the room and there were no comforters or chairs provided for them. On 10/23/24 at 2:45 PM during an interview with the resident in (B bed), she was asked if she felt like her room was like her home prior to coming to the facility. She said it was not. b) room [ROOM NUMBER] room [ROOM NUMBER] had two (2) residents residing in the room and there were no comforters or chairs provided for them. On 10/23/24 at 3:00 PM during an interview with the resident in (B bed) he was asked if he felt like his room was like his home prior to coming to the facility. He said it was not. c) room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop person-centered comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to develop care plans for a lap tray, dental issues, specialty mattress and failed to develop a resident centered care plan. This practice affected four (4) of (24) resident's care plans reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifiers: #2, #61, and #64. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #2 An observation on 10/21/24 12:45 PM Resident #2 had a lap tray in place in the dining room while eating lunch. A second observation on 10/22/24 at 845 AM Resident #2 had a lap tray in place when eating breakfast. A review of the current care plan showed there was no care plan addressing a lap tray during meals with interventions and goals. This showed it was not updated to reflect the residents' current status. A third observation on10/22/24 at 12:03 PM found the lap tray in place during lunch. On 10/22/24 at 12:14 PM during an interview the Administrator stated the tray was used for a table to eat only. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by not providing hand hygiene prior to meals. Facility Census: #63 Findings include: On 10/23/24 at 11:55 PM during the noon meal pass it was observed that residents in the dining room were not provided hand hygiene prior to their meal. On 10/23/24 at 12:17 PM It was confirmed with Licensed Practical Nurse #26 that the residents are to be offered hand hygiene prior to their meal. She stated it is usually either a towelette or a pump of hand sanitizer (anti bacterial disinfectant), I am not sure why they did not offer it to the residents today.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to honor resident choices regarding the things that are important in her life regarding making her bed early in the morning. This is true for one (1) of (1) residents reviewed for choices. Resident Identifier #25. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #25 During an observation with Resident #25, on 10/21/20 at 9:02 AM, she was upset about the staff not making her bed. On 10/22/24 at 08:57 AM during an interview, Resident #25 became upset and tearful about her bed not being made. She stated, They don't help me get my bed made in the mornings. She continued to say that she had to ask staff to come and make the bed all the time. On 10/22/24 at 3:36 PM during an interview the Social Services director revealed she was aware that Resident #25 liked her bed made early and got upset when it was not made. During an interview, on 10/23/24 at 1:15 PM, the Physical Therapy director stated that Resident #25 did get upset when staff did not make her bed and would refuse therapy treatment. No further information was provided prior to the end of the survey on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate notice of transfers or discharge for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of discharge. The facility failed to provide a facility-initiated discharge notice at least 30 days before the resident was discharged . For one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalizations, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a hospital transfer and the reasons for the move in writing. Resident identifiers: #168, #47. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #168 The Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator were interviewed on 10/24/24 at 11:15 AM regarding an anonymous complaint regarding a resident elopement. The resident had not been identified in the complaint. The DON and Administrator identified Resident #168 as a resident who was exit seeking and walked around the facility's campus and surrounding area with staff, but never actually eloped.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold notice to the Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalizations. Resident identifier: #47. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #47 Review of Resident #47's medical records showed the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to fever and increased secretions. The resident did not have capacity to make medical decisions. The resident returned to the facility 04/14/24. Further review of Resident #47's medical records showed a Bed Hold Notice of Policy and Authorization. The notice had been signed by a Licensed Practical Nurse, as the representative for the Center. However, the notice was not signed by the Resident Representative. On 10/23/24 at 4:25 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #47's representative was called and informed of the bed hold policy. She stated the Bed Hold Notice of Policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they facilitated a resident's involvement and invited him in advance to his care plan meeting. Resident identifier: #54. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #54 During an interview with Resident #54 on 10/22/24 at 11:59 AM he commented that he did not know anything about care plan meetings. Review of the medical record did not reveal any documentation regarding the facility's invitation to Resident #54 for care plan meetings or their facilitation to involve him in these meetings. During an interview with the social worker on 10/23/24 at 9:00 AM she said she goes around the day of the care plan and talks to the resident and asks him if he wants to attend the meeting. The medical record review revealed an invitation to the care conference scheduled for 10/24/24. The social worker said this invitation was mailed to the legal representative. Care plan conference sign in sheets for meetings held on 05/09/24, 02/08/24, 11/08/23, and 08/16/23 did not reveal the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to implement an ongoing activity program designed to meet the interests of and support the well-being of each resident. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents residing at the facility. Resident identifiers: #34 and #12. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #34 During multiple observations of Resident #34 on 10/21/24, 10/22/24 and 10/23/24, the resident was lying in bed with no activities being provided. Record review revealed an activities participation sheet. The activities assessments revealed one (1) on one (1) activities were required. During an interview on 10/23/22 at 12:48 PM with the facility Activities Director (AD) she stated that there was not any documentation of one (1) on one (1) activities being provided. She stated she only had one other staff member to provide activities seven (7) days a week. b) Resident #12 On 10/21/24 at 3:19 PM Resident #12 stated she liked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two (2) residents had received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive care plan. For Resident #61 they failed to follow a physician's order for wound care and failed to provide. For Resident #33 they failed to follow the care plan for the use of a palm protector. Resident identifiers: #61, #33. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #33 An observation on 10/21/24 at 2:57 PM revealed Resident #33 had a contracture to his left hand. The resident said she had suffered a stroke. The resident's medical record revealed she had a left hand contracture. Observations throughout the day on 10/21/24 and 10/22/24 revealed the resident's palm protector was not in place. On 10/24/24 at 11:15 AM during an interview with Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) #66 he stated he had recommended the palm protector when he worked with Resident #33. A palm protector can help with hand contractures by preventing skin breakdown and keeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to monitor weights as ordered by the physician for a resident at risk for weight loss. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of seven (7) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition. Resident identifier: #64. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #64 Review of Resident #64's comprehensive care plan showed the following focus initiated on 09/04/24, The resident has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t [related to] poor po [oral] intakes, need for mechanically altered diet, T2DM [type II diabetes mellitus], anxiety, PCM [protein calorie malnutrition], dementia, depression, Alzheimer's, underweight, presence of wound increasing needs. Review of Resident #64's physicians' orders showed an order written on 08/31/24 for the resident to be weighed daily for three (3) days, weekly for four (4) weeks, then monthly. Resident #64's documented weights were as follows: - 08/31/24: 128.2 pounds (lbs) - 09/01/24: 128.2 lbs - 09/23/24: 122.2 lbs - 10/01/24: 121.8 lbs Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0775 — isolated
    Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have laboratory reports filed in the resident 's clinical record. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #64. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #64 Review of Resident #64's physicians' orders showed an order for laboratory testing written on 09/03/24. The laboratory testing to be performed was complete blood count (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and Hemoglobin A1c (HgA1c). Resident #64's medical records contained the results for a CBC and HgA1c obtained on 09/05/24. The results contained the notation that the records were reviewed by [physician's initials] on 09/06/24. On 10/23/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) brought the CMP and TSH results to the surveyor. She stated she had obtained the results from the hospital laboratory who had tested the blood sample. The DON stated she didn't know why these results were not in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store a resident's beverages in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to storage. This has the ability to affect more than a limited number of Residents. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Nutrition pantry During the initial kitchen tour on 10/21/24 at 11:30 AM an observation of the nutrition pantry found a Residents 12 pack of Coke cans and two (2) six (6) packs of bottled Dr Pepper, and a coffee pot stored under the sink by the sewer/waste disposal pipe. On 10/21/24 at11:35 AM during an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) verified that resident's soda or coffee pot should not be stored under any sink. The soda and the coffee pot were removed at this time.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for Resident #6. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #6. Facility census: 62. Findings included: a) Resident #6 A review of the EMR on 12/18/24 at approximately 2:15 PM found pressure ulcer measurements for Resident #6 on 11/26/24, 11/29/24, 12/06/24, 12/13/24, and 12/17/24. The resident was in the hospital from [DATE] through 12/08/24 when the Resident returned to the facility. At approximately 3:00 PM on 12/18/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that she had made a mistake and there were no measurements during the time in which Resident #6 was in the hospital. In addition the DON stated that the measurements on 12/13/24 and 12/17/24 were correct and that the measurements on 11/26/24, 11/29/24, 12/06/24 had been struck out.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving resident abuse were reported, not later than 2 hours after the events / allegations were brought to the facility's attention, to appropriate state agencies as required. This was a random opportunity for discovery during a complaint survey. Resident identifier: #29. Facility census: 61. Findings iincluded: a) Resident #29 On 02/20/24 at 12:25 PM, a review of facility reportables from September 2023 - Present was completed. There was an abuse reportable, dated 02/05/24, which revealed the following details: -An allegation of abuse was made against Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #70. -The victim of abuse was Resident #29. Resident #29 was an [AGE] year-old white female who was admitted as a long-term care resident on 04/04/22. Resident #29 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's/Dementia and lacked capacity to make decisions for herself. -LPN #3 witnessed the incident between LPN #70 and Resident #29. LPN #3's gave the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives for behaviors. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the Complaint Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #63 Facility Census 61. Findings Included: a) Resident #63 On 02/20/24 at 12:05 PM, a brief medical record review found Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of mental status (BIMS) of 3 and lacking capacity. Further review of the medical record found the following physician order: behaviors - monitor for the following: itching, picking at skin, restlessness (agitation), hitting, increase in complaints, biting, kicking, spitting, cussing, racial slurs, elopement, stealing, delusions, hallucinations, psychosis, aggression and refusing care. A review of Resident #63's care plan found no goals, focus statements or interventions related to Resident #63's behaviors or behavior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they maintained housekeeping and maintenance necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior. Environmental issues were found on both of the facility's hallways. These observations were random opportunities for discovery. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) On 09/13/23 at 10:15 AM the environmental supervisor and later the housekeeping supervisor accompanied the surveyor to the rooms with concerns. room [ROOM NUMBER], #115, #202, and #214 had been identified on 09/11/23 as having issues that needed addressed. The following was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]: holes in the wall near the bed, chipped Formica in the window seal. The following was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]: Cracked floor tile near the air conditioning unit, cracked Formica on the window seal and dirt and debris inside the heating/air conditioning unit. The following was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]: Splashes on the wall underneath the sink. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure when (1) of three (3) residents reviewed had a change in medication and issues with sexually inappropriate behaviors the medical power of attorney was notified. Resident #59. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #59 A review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an order dated 03/06/23 for Cimetidine Oral Tablet 200 milligram (mg). The medication was ordered to be given as follows: One (1) tablet by mouth two (2) times a day for sexually inappropriate behaviors. Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2023 revealed Resident #59 received Cimetidine as ordered on 03/07/23, 03/08/23, 03/09/23, 03/10/23, 03/11/23, 03/12/23, 03/13/23, 03/14/23 and once on 03/15/23. Further medical record review revealed Cimetidine was discontinued on 03/15/23 per family request. A review of Resident #59's progress notes, and care plan did not reveal any sexually inappropriate behaviors. The minimum data set (MDS) review included a review of the admission assessment and quarterly MDS review.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview the facility failed to ensure three (3) randomly observed residents received the assistance needed to promote adequate grooming. Residents were observed with long, dirty fingernails. Resident identifiers: #23, #51, and #47. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #23 An observation of Resident #23 on 09/11/23 at 4:17 PM, revealed the resident had long fingernails. He said he would like to have them cut shorter. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) review revealed a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/03/23. Under Section E which assesses a residents need for assistance with activities of daily living the resident was assessed as needing extensive assistance with personal hygiene. b) Resident #51 The resident was observed on 09/11/23 at 1:40 PM. He was observed to have long fingernails. He was interviewed and said he would like to have them cut. He said sometimes his family would cut them for him. His MDS with an ARD of 06/30/23 revealed he was extensive assist with personal hygiene. C)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. Resident #59 had been prescribed a medication without indication for use. Resident identifier: #59. Census: 58. Findings included: A review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an order dated 03/06/23 for Cimetidine Oral Tablet 200 milligram (mg). The medication was ordered to be given as follows: One (1) tablet by mouth two (2) times a day for sexually inappropriate behaviors. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2023 revealed Resident #59 received Cimetidine as ordered on 03/07/23, 03/08/23, 03/09/23, 03/10/23, 03/11/23, 03/12/23, 03/13/23, 03/14/23 and once on 03/15/23. Further medical record review revealed Cimetidine was discontinued on 03/15/23 per family request. A review of Resident #59's progress notes, and care plan did not reveal any sexually inappropriate behaviors. The minimum data set (MDS) review included a review of the admission assessment and quarterly MDS review. Section E which assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #13, #5 and #20 was coded to accurately reflect the residents status. This was true for three (3) of 21 sampled residents during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #13, #5 and #20. Facility Census: 57. Findings Included: a) Resident #13 A review of Resident #13's medical record on 11/28/22 found the resident was sent to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the record found a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/06/22. This MDS was coded under section A0310. Type of Assessment F. Entry/discharge reporting with a number 10 indicating the resident was discharged with a return not anticipated. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/30/22 at 10:06 am confirmed the MDS should have been coded Discharge Return Anticipated because the resident was sent to the hospital for an acute illness and was expected to return once her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-30 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all nurse aides had an employee performance review completed at least annually. This was true for five (5) of five (5) Nurse Aides reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to effect more than an isolated number of residents. Employee Identifiers: Nurse Aide (NA) # 49, NA # 53, NA #54, NA #30 and NA #40. Facility Census: 57. Findings Included: a) Employee Performance Reviews On 11/29/22 the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked to provide the current nurse aide performance reviews for Nurse Aide (NA) #49, NA #53, NA #54, NA #30, and NA #40. On 11/30/22 at 8:20 am the NHA was asked if she had the requested NA performance reviews. She stated, We have not done those within the last year. When asked when the last one was completed she stated, The last one was done before COVID. .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-30 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information posted daily contained the correct number of staff working including the actual hours worked for each licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. This failed practice had the potential to more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: 57. Findings included: a) Nurse Staff Postings A record review of the Nurse Staff Postings maintained by the facility as well as the facility's Hours Per Patient Day (HPPD) report for the time frame of 04/01/22 to 06/30/22, found on the following occasions the nurse staff posting hours were more than the actual hours worked on the HPPD report which is generated from the time clock hours when the staff punch in and out for their shift. The HPPD report contains the acutal number of hours worked by those providing direct care to the residents. -- 04/01/22 the staff posting indicated a total of 167 hours of direct care, but the HPPD report indicated a total of 143.75 total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #49's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Resident #49's physician agreed to decrease Resident #49's antipsychotic medication on 06/20/22. This medication was not decreased until 07/18/22 which was 28 days after the physician agreed to discontinue the medication. In addition nursing staff was identifying on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) that Resident #49 had side effects related to psychotherapeutic medications, but failed to identify what the side effect was and/or to implement an alternative plan of care without side effects. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier: #49. Facility Census: 57. Findings Included: a) Resident #49 1. Gradual Dose Reduction of Seroquel A review of Resident #49's medical record found a Consultation Report issued by the pharmacist containing a recommendation date 07/18/22. The comment on the recommendation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    c) Resident (R) #20 Review of the medical record on 11/30/22 revealed R #20's hospital after visit summary notes he takes Buspirone (antianxiety medication) twice a day for repeated episodes of anxiety. The physician's history and physical dated 08/05/2022 states past medical history: As above, and see hospital records and no change in condition under the psychiatric system. The physician admission orders include Buspirone hydrochloride 10 milligrams (mg) twice a day for anxiety. The diagnosis section of the medical record and the admission minimal data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 08/15/20 are silent for the diagnosis of anxiety. During an interview on 11/30/22 at 09:24 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed R#20's active diagnosis of anxiety is not listed in the diagnosis section of the medical record or in the admission MDS assessment. Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide complete and accurate medical records. Resident #34 had incomplete hospice interventions on the care plan and Resident #20 had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff were unaware of the correct procedures to follow for residents in isolation, isolation carts for soiled gowns were not hands free, and medications were not administered safely in an isolation room. This practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census: 57. Findings include: a) Staff isolation practices A random observation on 11/28/22 revealed a resident room marked with a stop sign stating Standard plus Contact precautions to prevent the spread of infection. Please see the nurse before entering the room. When asked, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 reported the isolation was for Resident (R) #159's foot wound which contains Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE). LPN #29 reported anyone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan in a timely manner. This was true for one (1) of ten (10) new admissions reviewed. Resident identifier #258. Facility Census: 57. Findings Included: a) Resident #258 A review of Resident #258's medical record found the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a femur fracture and urinary tract infection (UTI) as well as Alzheimer's disease, a history of falls, hypertension, coronary artery disease, muscle weakness and difficulty walking. Further review of the medical record on 11/30/22 found no baseline care plan for Resident #258. An interview with the Administrator on 11/30/22 at 1:00 pm confirmed Resident #258 did not have a baseline care plan and should have. .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet Resident #20's mental and psychosocial needs. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during the long term survey process. Resident identifier: #20. Facility census: 57. Findings included: a) Resident #20 Review of the medical record on 11/30/22 revealed Resident #20's hospital after visit summary notes he takes Buspirone (antianxiety medication) twice a day for repeated episodes of anxiety. The physician admission orders include Buspirone hydrochloride 10 milligrams (mg) twice a day for anxiety. The care plan identifies a focus of limited engagement related to a diagnosis of depression, but lacks any goals or interventions. In addition, the care plan is silent for Residnet #20's diagnosis of anxiety and the administration of his psychotropic medications. During an interview on 11/30/22 at 09:24 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #20 has diagnoses of anxiety and depression. The DON acknowledged the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to review and revise the care plan in relation to the Resident's nutrition assessment orders. This was true for One (1) of 21 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care process. Resident Identifier: #41 Facility Census: 57 Findings Included: a) Resident #41 A review of Resident #41's medical record found the following current physician orders: -- House Supplement two times a day house shake 2 time/day at 10 AM and evening snack providing 400 calories/12 gm protein r/t (related to) weight loss. Order date 7/26/22 -- Regular diet Regular Texture texture. Order date 10/28/22 -- Obtain Monthly weight every day shift every 1 month(s) starting on the 10th for 1 day(s). Order date 11/01/22 Resident #41's current care plan (created on 6/28/22) read as follows: Focus: Resident is at nutritional risk related to dementia with new environment, hx (history) of significant weight loss. Goal: Resident will receive and tolerate diet as ordered without s/s (signs or symptoms) aspiration or dysphagia and will consume…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-30 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow their own policies, or state law as related to discharges which are Against Medical Advice (AMA) for Resident # 55. These practices affected one (1) of two (2) resident's reviewed for the care area of discharges during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident Identifier #55. Facility census 57. a) Resident #55 A review of Resident #55's medical record on 11/29/22 found Resident #55 was discharged from the facility on 11/12/22. Contained in the medical record was a Voluntary Discharge Against Medical Advice form that was signed by Resident #55 dated 11/12/22. A review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Against Medical Advice (AMA) with an effective date 06/01/96, found the following: . Documenting the AMA : . 7. The discharge transition plan will be provided to the patient or resident representative. Efforts will be made to make referrals to community resources and agencies to the extent possible. The Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to obtain a re-weight after the Resident experienced a significant weight loss. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for weight loss. Resident Identifier: #41 Facility Census: 57 Findings Included: a) Resident #41 Resident #41 has current orders for: -- House Supplement two times a day house shake 2 time/day at 10 AM and evening snack providing 400 calories/12 gm protein r/t weight loss. Order date: 07/26/22 -- Regular diet Regular Texture texture. Order date: 10/28/22 -- Obtain Monthly weight every day shift every 1 month(s) starting on the 10th for 1 day(s). Order date 11/01/22 The medical record contained the following weights: 11/10/22 at 4:55 pm 149.0 Pounds(Lbs) 11/1/22 at 5:00 pm 147.6 Lbs 10/10/22 at 09:04 am 147.6 Lbs 10/3/22 at 6:07 pm 147.0 Lbs 09/26/22 at 10:21 am 146.0 Lbs 09/19/22 at 11:23 am 146.0 Lbs 09/12/22 at 4:27 pm 145.6 Lbs 09/5/22 at 09:08 am 145.8 Lbs 08/29/22 at 09:24 am 146.2 Lbs 08/22/22 at 10:19 am 144.0 Lbs 08/15/22 at 07:52 am 144.4 Lbs 08/08/22 at 4:37 pm 143.2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered dietary staff had not used proper hand sanitation. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 57. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour an observation on 11/28/22 at 12:01 PM, revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #5 had picked up mustard packets, that had fallen to the floor. DA #5 did not wash her hands before returning to the beverage and dessert area of the tray service line, and began serving food and/or beverages. An interview with DA #5 on 11/28/22 at 12:02 PM, verified she picked up the mustard packets from the floor and did not wash her hands before resuming the service of food. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-30 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice services to develop a coordinated care plan for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of hospice during the Long Term Care Survey Process. The care plan for Resident #34 did not specify when and what services were to be provided by the hospice staff. Resident identifier: #34. Facility census: 57. Findings included: a) Resident #34 A medical record review on 11/30/22 for Resident #34, revealed the care plan did not include any information regarding when the hospice nurse aides and nurses would visit and what specific services they would provide. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 11/30/22 at 12:29 PM, verified the care plan for Resident #34 did not specify care and services to be provided by the hospice staff. .

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-10-24 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing posting was completed accurately for 13 of 16 days. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Staffing data An observation on 10/21/24, 10/22/24, and 10/23/24 of the facility posted staffing data, found the facility name was not on the document. A facility record review of posted staffing data for 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 11/20/23, and 05/25/34 found the required shift census was not documented. On 05/26/24, 10/04/24, 10/05/24, 10/06/24, 10/19/24 and 10/20/24 found the required facility name not documented. During an interview on 10/24/24 at 10:08 AM the administrator verified the census and facility name was not documented. She stated that she would add the facility name now.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$39,390 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $39,390 — penalty dated 2024-10-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 1 of 53.7-2.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Highland Ridge Rehab CenterDublin, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5Mountain View Care CenterRipley, WV 1 of 5New Martinsville Health & RehabNew Martinsville, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Winchester Health & RehabilitationWinchester, VA 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Laurelhurst Post Acute & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Lynn Care CenterFront Royal, VA 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Tygart Valley Health & RehabilitationBelington, WV 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Blue Ridge Therapy ConnectionStuart, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WV GEN 2 SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/31/2023
BRENNEMAN, JULIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/31/2023
STERLING, PHILLIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/31/2023

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$147K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 4%Other / private 8%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $147K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$358per resident / day
operating cost
$10,897per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$327per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515103. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next