No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tygart Valley Health & Rehabilitation

216 Samaritan Circle, Belington, WV 26250 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (304) 823-2555 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (304) 823-2555 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jan 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
70 N Sturmer St · (304) 823-2800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
73 Bridge St · (304) 823-1198 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
806 Crim Ave · (304) 823-3104 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Crim Ave · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.0%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.4%7.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.0%15.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.2%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.2%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.1%22.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.4%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine47.8%79.4%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
39.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-20)
25
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to allow Resident #46 to have a dignified dining experience. This finding was related to the facility failing to serve his meal with the other residents at his table before serving other tables. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #46. Facility Census: 54.Findings Included:a) Resident #46 On 11/17/25 at 12:46 PM, during a dining room observation, It was observed that Resident #46 was not served his lunch tray with the rest of his tablemates before staff began serving other tables. In an interview with Certified Nurse Assistant(CNA) employee identifier # on 11/17/20250 at 1:14 PM, she acknowledged Resident #46 was not served correctly with the other resident at his table.During an interview on 11/19/2025, at approximately 2:45 PM, the facility Director of Nursing stated she was made aware that Resident #46 was not served his lunch with his tablemates in the dining room on 11/17/25.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards. This is true for the kitchen walk in cooler and utensil storage.This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census: 54.Findings included:a) On 11/17/2525 at 12:27PM, during Initial Brief Tour of Kitchen with the facility Kitchen Manager, who acknowledged the following in the walk-in cooler, an opened plastic bag of lettuce with no label or dates and in the utensil drawer, the utensils were incorrectly placed in different directions. On 11/18/25 at 1:30 PM, the Cooperate Kitchen Manager (CKM) acknowledged the bag of lettuce in the walk-in cooler without a dated label 9/25 and the utensils were not stored correctly in the utensil drawer. On 11/19/25 at 2:25PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing, she stated she was aware of the unlabeled lettuce in the walk-in cooler and the incorrectly stored utensils.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure it had a complete and accurate medical record related to dental status. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (3) three residents reviewed for dental during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #54. Facility census: 54. Findings Include: a) Resident #54 An observation on 11/17/25 at 3:15 PM revealed Resident #54 sitting in the hallway in her wheelchair. She had several teeth missing and some were decayed and broken off at the gums.A record review on 11/18/25 at 12:30 PM, revealed that Resident #54 had seen an in-house dentistry on 02/06/25. The dental consult showed the following:Teeth numbers 11, 21, 22, and 6 are decayed. Teeth numbers 1-3, 13-20, 31 and 32 are missing. Teeth numbers 7-10 and 25-30 are retained root.The summary of the dental consult read as follows: Limited tolerance with treatment will attempt to complete extractions on 29 and 30 next time. PC/SC left with facility to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases, to help prevent cross-contamination and infections including Covid-19 in regard to, follow CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines for use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to wound care for a resident on (Enhanced Barrier Precautions). The facility also failed to ensure a barrier was maintained in the laundry area and failed to repair unhygienic wheelchair surfaces. These failed practices had the potential to affect every resident currently residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #4, #24, #8, #46, and #50. Facility census: 54. Findings included: a) Resident #8 A record review revealed Resident #8 was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to wound care. On 11/19/25 at 2:00 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #66 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon Record Review and Interviews, the facility failed to promote Resident #7's self determination through choices for her shower preference and time. This was true for one (1) out of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident identifier: #7. Census: 54. Findings include:a) Resident #7 Record review on 11/18/25 showed the care plan reflected showers three (3) times a week, but no preferences noted. The shower tracking sheet confirmed that showers were given on 11/18/25 and on 11/11/25. Task record on system showed shower/bathe self-Monday, Wednesday and Friday nights and PRN (as needed).During an interview, on 11/18/25 at 9:09 AM, with Resident #7, she stated they do not get many showers due to being scheduled on the same days as their dialysis (M-W-F) nights.Resident #7 said she had previously requested the staff move it because she was so exhausted from the treatments. I have not gotten a shower in lord knows how long. The facility is ok with me wanting three showers a week, but that's very hard with my treatments.During an interview with the Director of Nursing #20 (DON) she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to coordinate with the appropriate State-designated authority,to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs when completing/revising a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR). Resident identifier #34. Facility Census: 54Findings Included:a) Resident # 34Review of the PASSR dated 11/18/24 found the following medical diagnosis was not identified on the Pre admission Screening and Resident Review.Major Depressive Disorder onset 04/29/25,Schizophrenic Disorder onset 12/03/24The above information was confirmed with the Director Of Nursing (DON) on 11/18/25 at 2:20 PM. The DON agreed that the additional medical diagnosis should be on the PASSR.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to dependent residents. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (4) four residents reviewed for ADL care during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #54. Facility census: 54. Findings Include:a) Resident #54 An observation on 11/17/25 at 3:15 PM, revealed Resident #54 sitting in the hallway, she had several hair stubbles on her chin and her mustache area. During an interview on 11/17/25 at 3:15 PM, Resident #54 stated, I would like for them to shave them off every time, but they don't.During an interview on 11/17/25 at 3:20 PM, The Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Her shower day is today. The system shows she had her shower today already. I will get it taken care of. A review on 11/17/25 at 3:30 PM, revealed an ADL care plan for Resident #54 with a focus that reads as follows:(Resident #54 name) is a long-term care resident and requires assistance with their ADL's related to chronic health conditions, congestive heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon Record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide one on one activities fo one (1) of four 4) residents that were unable to participate in group activities. Residents identifier: #7. Census: 54. Findings included:a) Resident #7Record review on 11/18/25 at 9:20 AM revealed Resident #7 was receiving dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. This had an impact on how the resident was able to participate in activities due to the energy level after dialysis. Resident #7 was not listed on any 1:1 activity sheets or the sunshine visit list. The residents on the sunshine visit list get morning visits or non-group activities provided.During an interview with Resident #7 on 11/18/25 at 9:20 AM the resident stated, No one comes into my room for activities. I don't do well in group activities because I am always tired. I don't have a lot of chances to talk with people. My roommate doesn't talk so I don't even get the chance to talk to them. I don't have the energy to go out and participate most days.The Activities Director (AD), was interviewed on 11/19/25 at 12:13 PM, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by not following physician orders related to insulin and weights. This failed practice was found true for (2) two of 25 residents reviewed for physician order accuracy during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #11 and #4. Facility census: 54.Findings included: a) Resident #4 Record review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, with a date 10/01/21 showed: Any weight (wt.) change of 5% or more since last weight will be retaken for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the physician/practitioner and dietary team. Medical record review on 11/20/25, showed a 14.12 % weight increase for Resident #4, 11/17/25 at 4:02 PM 187.5 lbs. 10/01/25 1:55 PM 185.1 lbs. 09/05/25 5:11 PM 164.8 lbs. 09/02/25 7:15 PM 162.2 lbs. During an interview on 11/20/22 at 2:45 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified a reweight was not completed and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure emergency dental services were provided to Medicaid funded residents in a timely manner. This failed practice was found true for (2) two of (3) three residents reviewed for dental services during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #54 and #20. Facility census: 54. a) Resident #20 On 11/17/2025 at 2:55 PM, during interview and observation with Resident #20, it was observed that the resident had some missing, and decayed teeth. Resident #20 stated, I have asked to have some pulled and a plate put in a while back and nothing has been done. She pointed to one tooth that had been cracked and stated that had happened about a week ago. Record review on 11/18/25 at 12:30 PM, revealed that Resident #20 had seen an in-house dentist on 08/15/25. The dental consult showed the following: Teeth numbers 1-16, 17-19, 24, 25, 29-32, are missing. Teeth number 28 retained root. The summary of the dental consult reads as follows: Pt. wants to have remaining lower teeth extracted and the after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to support the residents' rights, by not placing the name and contact information for the State Ombudsman in a location that was easily accessible for all residents to read. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) During the Resident Council meeting, on 01/09/24 at 11:00 AM, the resident council members all said they did not know where the information was located for the Ombudsman. An observation, on 01/09/24 at 11:45 AM, of the posting for the Ombudsman information revealed the information was posted in a case mounted to the wall on 100 hall. The case was high on the wall and was not accessible for residents who were in wheelchairs. During an interview, on 01/10/24 at 10:28 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) Assessment Coordinator, she stated, Well I can see it, if I was in a wheelchair I couldn't see it and especially with that glare off that glass.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) form to three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the facility's beneficiary protection notification practice. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifiers: #38, #40, and #5. Facility census: 47 Findings Included: a. Failure to Issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) Form Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) Form CMS-10055 (2018) indicates Medicare requires Skilled Nursing Facilities to issue the SNF ABN to Medicare beneficiaries prior to providing care that Medicare usually covers, but may not pay for because the care is: - not medically reasonable and necessary; or - considered custodial. The SNF ABN provides information to the beneficiary so that he/she can decide whether or not to get the care that may not be paid for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the temperatures were within the required parameters, which is 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 81 Degrees F. in the shower room. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's room was clean. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers #1. Facility census 47. Findings Included: a) Resident #1 During an observation on 01/08/24 at 12:00 PM, in Resident #1's room, under the bed there is a very sticky substance with black dirt and dust buildup on it. There were also 6 caps of what appears to be tops to the tube feeding bolus under the bed. During an observation on 01/09/24 at 10:00 AM, of Resident #1's room under the bed there is a very sticky substance with black dirt and dust buildup on it. There were also 6 caps of what appears to be tops to tube feeding bolus under the bed. During an interview on 01/09/24 at 1:31 PM, with the facilities Maintenance Director, he stated, They clean these rooms daily. Yes, that is dirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview observation the facility failed to develop and or implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan as required. This was true for four (4) of twenty-three (23) care plans reviewed during the long-term care survey. Resident identifiers: #195, #21, #15, #27 Facility Census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident 195 On 01/08/24 at 1:11 PM observation of Resident #195 sitting at his bedside. During our conversation a round tin of Grizzly long cut tobacco product was observed on his over the bed table. The surveyor questioned if he used tobacco, and he replied, I use snuff, (pointing to the tin) been using it since I was 11. The tobacco at bedside was confirmed with Licensed Practical Nurse #2. The facility was a smoke free facility; however, smokeless tobacco was permitted. On 01/09/24, record review shows a Safety Resident Evaluation dated 01/02/24, completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #29. Section #4 on the evaluation is for smoking safety. Question #1 for tobacco…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free from accident hazards in which it had control. One (1) medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a safety assessment on Resident #195 related to his use of smokeless tobacco in his room. These were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #195. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Unlocked Medication Cart on 3 [NAME] Hall The facility's Medication Storage policy states, Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. On 01/10/24 at 11:33 AM, Surveyor observed the medication cart on the 3 [NAME] Hall was unlocked and unattended. The Regional Director of Clinical Operations #72 confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff posting was accurate and correct. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing at the facility. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Staff posting During a random opportunity for discovery on 01/09/24, the staff posting had not been updated from 01/08/24 to 01/09/24. Also the staff posting was not in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/10/24 at 11:00 AM, the DON verified the staff posting had not been updated and it was not posted in a prominent place accessible to residents and visitors.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census 47. Findings included: a) Dining Services Based on anonymous resident interviews during the long term care survey process, multiple residents had complaints of the hot food being cold. During the resident council meeting on 01/09/23 at 11:00 AM, the resident council members made complaints that the food being served at meals is cold. Observation on 01/10/24 01:10 PM, found the temperatures of the last tray served on 300 hall were: noodles with meat sauce tempted at 122 degrees Fahrenheit and the vegetable barley soup tempted at 122 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview on 01/10/24 at 1:15 PM, the facilities Dietary Manager (DM) stated, The food normally temps at 165 degrees before we serve the residents. When it is served to the residents it should be between 135 degrees and 140 degrees. Observation of the temperature log in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. It was discovered the ice machine was not draining properly, there was expired food found in walk-in cooler and food stored on the floor in the storage area. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Ice machine During a random opportunity for discovery, on 01/09/23 at 2:10 PM, it was discovered the ice machine was not draining properly. The drain was located below the floor drain, which provided for a no stop gap of one (1) inch to prevent backflow. In an interview with the Director of Maintenance on 01/09/24 at 2:50 PM, verified the drain line did not have a stop gap between the floor and the drain. b) Initial tour of the kitchen At 11:45 AM on 01/08/24, a tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) #25 found the following items in the walk-in refrigerator that were expired: A plastic container labeled as Lunch Meat, had two dates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #194 and #11. Facility Census: 47. Findings Included: a) 300 [NAME] hallway On 01/08/24 at 12:50 PM during observation of the lunch meal trays being passed on the 300 [NAME] hallway, no hand hygiene was provided to the residents prior to their meal. When Nurse Aide (NA) #69 and #27 were asked how they provide hand hygiene, they looked at each other and laughed. NA #27 stated, 'they use to put hand wipes on the trays, but they don't anymore. They both then continued to pass the remaining meal trays without providing hand hygiene. It was confirmed with NA #69 and #27 that they did not provide hand hygiene. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing on 01/08/24 at 1:10 PM. b) Resident #194 On 01/08/24 at 2:38 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience by not providing meals to all residents seated at the same table at the same time. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #5 and #30. Facility census 47. Findings included: a) Resident #5 During an observation, on 01/08/24 at 1:00 PM, Resident #5 was seated at a dining room table for lunch. Two (2) other residents seated at the same table were served their lunch tray. Staff then served 2 residents seated at another table. Another resident seated by herself was served at another table. Resident #5 still did not have her tray. During an interview, on 01/08/24 at 1:10 PM, with the Activity Director, she stated, I'm not really sure how they have them , maybe the resident is at the wrong table. During an observation on 01/08/24 at 1:12 PM, Resident #5 received her lunch tray. During an interview on 01/08/24 1:12 PM, Nursing Assistant (NA)# 36 stated, She must have parked herself there. During an interview on 01/10/24 at 10:54 AM, with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure [NAME] Virginia Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were completed correctly for two (2) of twenty-three (23) residents in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifiers: #18 and #15. Facility Census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #18 On 01/08/24 at 2:51 PM, record review found the POST form for Resident #18, dated 03/31/23 with a verbal signature for the Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA). On 01/09/24 at 12:15 PM an interview with Social Worker (SW) #43 confirmed the POST form was not completed correctly because the MPOA had not physically signed the POST form in a timely manner. The POST form contained only verbal consent from the MPOA. The SW also confirmed that there was no documentation of reaching out to the MPOA to have the POST signed by her. According to the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care the following guidelines are to be followed. The signature section provides a declaration on behalf of the patient (or incapacitated patient's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report the results of a thorough investigation of a fall with serious bodily injury to Adult Protective Services and the State Survey Agency, within five (5) working days of the incident in accordance with State law. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed under falls in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #3 and #144. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #3 A record review of the facility reportables, completed on 01/10/24 at 9:20 AM, demonstrated that Resident #3 had experienced a fall with serious bodily injury on 11/05/23 and an Immediate Fax Reporting was sent to the appropriate state agencies. There was no evidence the facility shared the Five (5) Day Follow-Up / Investigation Details with Adult Protective Services (APS). During an interview on 01/10/24 at 9:55 AM, the Social Worker reported he could not produce any evidence results of the Five (5) Day Follow-Up was shared with APS in accordance with State Law. b) Resident #144 A record review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a copy of the notice of transfer/discharge was sent to the Ombudsman. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed under the Hospitalization pathway in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #144. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #144 A record review, completed on 01/09/24 at 11:40 AM, revealed Resident #144 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence in the electronic medical record that a copy of the Notice of Transfer/Discharge was sent to the long-term care Ombudsman. During an interview on 01/09/24 at 2:21 PM, the Social Worker reported he could not produce evidence the Notice of Transfer/Discharge form had been faxed to and received by the Ombudsman.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 23 residents had an accurate Minimum Data Sets (MDS) which reflected the resident's status at the time of the assessment. Resident identifiers: #12 and #21. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #12 On 01/08/24 at 2:16 PM, the resident said, I need some false teeth so I can eat. My teeth hurt and I need them pulled. I was supposed to have an appointment but I don't know what's going on. I don't think I have any appointments to see a dentist. Review of the last annual MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/12/23 coded the resident as having no dental issues. At 8:33 AM on 01/10/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about the Resident's dental status. The DON said, She wants dentures but she doesn't want to pay for them. At 8:45 AM on 01/10/24, the DON and the surveyor observed the resident's dental status. The Resident said I have a toothache. The cardiologist I saw yesterday said those teeth need to come out. Review of the Resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #35 had a baseline care plan developed within 48 hours of admission which addressed a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) treated with an antibiotic. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents recently admitted to the facility. Resident identifier: #35. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #35 Record review found the Resident was a new admission to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital with a UTI. She was being treated with the antibiotic: Doxycycline Hyclate Oral Tablet 100 MG (Doxycycline Hyclate), 1 tablet two (2) times a day. The Resident received the antibiotic at the facility through 12/22/23. At 10:55 AM on 01/10/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the baseline care plan triggers created on 12/14/23 with the surveyor. The DON confirmed the antibiotic usage and the UTI was never care planned for Resident #35.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to involve the resident and/or resident representative when developing a comprehensive person-centered care plan for discharge planning for Resident #42. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for discharge planning during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #42. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #42 Medical record review, on 01/09/24, revealed during an interdisciplinary team meeting on 10/27/23 there was discussion of the upcoming discharge. Resident #42 had self initiated a discharge to return home. The progress note did not indicate the resident was present during the meeting. In an interview with, the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) on 01/09/24 at 2:10 PM, the LSW reported he was unable to provide any verification that Resident #42 had attended the discharge meeting on 10/27/23.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete the discharge/physician's recapitulation of residents stay. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for the area of discharges during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident #42 had no recapitulation for a community discharge and Resident #43 expired at the facility and also had no physician's recapitulation. Resident identifiers: #42 and #43. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #42 During a medical record review on [DATE], it revealed there was no discharge summary or physician's recapitulation completed for Resident #42 when he was discharged to the community on [DATE]. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on [DATE] at 2:48 PM, verified there was no discharge summary or physician's recapitulation for Resident #42's discharge. b) Resident #43 During a medical record review on [DATE], it revealed there was no discharge summary or physician's recapitulation completed for Resident #43 when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide the communication book and dry erase board used as assistive device to communicate with staff. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for communication during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #27. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #27 A medical record review on 01/09/24 for Resident #27,with a hearing deficit had a comprehensive care plan with an intervention for the resident to have a communication book to assist her in communicating with the staff. In an interview on 01/09/24 at 1:35 PM, with the Licensed Social Worker (LSW), explained Resident #27 used a dry erase board, when she was unable to read your lips. During an observation on 01/09/24 at 1:40 PM, the LSW and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, both were unable to locate the communication book or dry erase board used as assistive devices to communicate with staff.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (1) of three (3) residents. Resident identifier: # 32. Facility census 47. Findings included: a) Resident #32 During an observation on 01/08/24 at 11:30 AM, Resident #32 was sitting in the dining room by herself with no music, television or interaction from staff or other residents. During an observation, on 01/08/24 at 2:00PM, Resident #32 was sitting at the nurses station, there was an activity going on in the facility chapel but Resident #32 was not in attendance. During an observation, on 01/09/24 at 1:00 PM, Resident #32 was sitting at nurses station with no interaction from staff or residents. During an observation, on 01/09/24 at 3:32 PM, Resident #32 was sitting at nurses station with no interaction from staff or residents. During an interview, on 01/09/24 at 03:35 PM, with the facilities Activity Director,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for three (3) of 23 residents reviewed during the long term care survey. Resident #36 did not have an Unna boot as ordered by the physician. For Resident #12 the facility did not follow the physician ordered parameters for medication administration. For Resident #28 the facility failed to notify the physician when the resident refused medication. Resident identifiers: #36, #12, and #28. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #36 Observation of the Resident on 01/08/24 at 3:08 PM, found both lower legs were a variation of red and purple and both lower legs were swollen. The left lower leg was dry and scaly. When asked about the observation, the Resident said, I was supposed to have an Unna boot on my right leg but the nurse told me they don't have any. The resident said he had been several days without the boot but he could not recall exactly how long and he could not recall the name of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments and care were performed within professional standards of care. This was true for two (2) of two (2) wound dressings observed during the long term survey process. Resident Identifiers: #194 and #11 Facility Census: 47. Findings Included: a) #194 On 01/08/24 at 2:38 PM record review shows Resident #194 has a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the right buttock. There is a dressing change order as follows: Cleanse stage 2 with soap and water. Pat dry. Cover with border dressing daily and porn if loose or soiled until clear one time a day for Stage 2 pressure Ulcer related to PRESSURE ULCER OF RIGHT BUTTOCK, STAGE 2 until clear and as needed for of loose or soiled related to PRESSURE ULCER OF RIGHT BUTTOCK, STAGE 2 until clear. On 01/09/24 at 01:50 PM wound care was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 performing the care. The Resident was in bed on her side and had a brief on, she had had a bowel movement. The LPN placed her gloves on, removed the old dressing in place and cleaned the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to address a resident receiving nutrition via peg tube when weight loss occurred. This failed practice was true for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #1. Facility census 47. Findings included: a) Resident #1 An record review on 01/08/24 at 2:56 PM, revealed Resident #32 who receives all nutrition via peg tube weighed 100.6 lbs on 6/02/23, 96.8 lbs on 10/31/23, 93 lbs on 12/14/23 and 89.8 lbs on 01/02/24. This calculated out to be a 10.74% weight loss in the past 6 months. During a record review on 01/08/24 at 3:15 PM, of Resident #32's last 3 quarterly nutritional assessments it reads that resident is tolerating his tube feeding well and shows the calculation of the weight loss. It also revealed that the weight loss was not addressed in no other way but to add him to weekly weights. During a record review on 01/08/24 at 3:30 PM, the surveyor found no notes in Resident #32's medical chart from the doctor addressing the weight loss. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen humidifier bubbler on the oxygen concentrator was working. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for respiratory care during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #12. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #12 On 01/08/24 at 12:25 PM, the Resident said the water bottle on her oxygen tank was empty. She said they only fill it once a week and that is not enough, it runs dry. She said the water makes her nose not dry out so quickly. She said she is supposed to use oxygen all the time and she receives 2 liters of oxygen. On 01/08/24 at 12:29 PM, the Resident's Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 observed the humidifier bubbler and said the water level is too low for it to work. I will take care of it right now. Review of the Resident's physician's orders found an order for: Oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) per nasal cannula via O2 concentrator and/or tank as needed Change Bubbler and fill to maximum fill line with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure follow up dental services were provided to one (1) of two (2) Resident's reviewed for the care area of dental services during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier: #12. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #12 On 01/08/24 at 2:16 PM, the Resident said, I need some false teeth so I can eat. My teeth hurt and I need them pulled. I was supposed to have an appointment, but I don't know what's going on. I don't think I have any appointments to see a dentist. The last annual minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/12/23 coded the resident as having no dental issues. At 8:33 AM on 01/10/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about the Resident's dental status. The DON said, She wants dentures, but she doesn't want to pay for them. Review of the medical record found the resident's payer source was Medicaid and had been since 01/25/21. At 8:45 AM on 01/10/24, the DON and the surveyor visited the resident in her room. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #35 had physician ordered assistive devices available to improve her ability to drink. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #35. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #35 Record review found a physician's order for, Kennedy cups at all meals, dated 12/18/23. Observation on 01/09/24 at 12:37 PM, with Occupational Therapist (OT) #47 found the resident had two (2) Kennedy cups on her lunch tray, one filled with water and one with punch. However, the resident also had a glass of tomato juice and a carton of milk. The Resident was observed trying to drink her tomato juice from the glass. OT #47 said the Resident needed a Kennedy cup for each of her liquids. On 01/09/24 at 1:05 PM, the Director of Nursing was advised of the above observation with OT #47. No further information was provided.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-27 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure staff maintained current Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification for healthcare providers through a CPR provider whose training includes hands-on practice and in-person skills assessment. This was true for four (4) licensed nursing staff. This was a random opportunity of discovery. Employee Identifiers: Registered Nurse (RN) #35, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12, #40, and #27. Facility Census: 48 Findings Included: a) On [DATE] at 12:29 PM during a review of records of active CPR certified nursing employees, it was found that four (4) nursing employees were not certified in CPR. Registered Nurse (RN) #35 was not certified through the American Red Cross or The American Heart Association. Her certification was from the national CPR foundation making it invalid. According to the facility's Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Certification Requirements policy dated [DATE] The only two recognized providers are the American…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice in providing the medical needs of the resident. Resident #11's physician was not notified of a weight gain as directed by the physicians orders. For Resident #4 and Resident #41 neurological checks were not performed as required following falls. This was true for three (3) of 26 sampled residents. Resident Identifiers: # 11, #4, #41. Facility Census: 48 Findings Included: a) Resident #11 Resident #11 has a history of Congestive Heart Failure. There is a Physicians order to weigh the resident daily and call the Physician if the weight gain is greater than three (3) pounds in 24 hours. There were four (4) instances that the Residents' weight reflected a gain of three (3) or more pounds in 24 hours and the Physician was not notified. The following dates indicated the weight gain and need to notify the physician. On 3/30/22 he weighed 224.6 pounds and on 3/31/22 he weighed 227.8 pounds indicating a 3.2 pound weight gain in 24 hours. Weighed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #70.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The facility failed to label and date food items that were open and failed to dispose of expired food items. The facility also failed to maintain an accurate dishwasher and resident refrigerator temperature log. The facility also stores other food in the resident's refrigerator. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen and the Resident's refrigerator. Facility Census: 48 Findings Included: a) Walk-in Freezer A review of a facility policy titled date marking-food and nutrition with a revision date of 05/03/22 found the following. Procedure: .2 a 1) The date/time the original container is opened 2) The date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premised, or discarded. An initial tour of the kitchen with the Nutrition and Food Service Supervisor (NFSS) beginning on 9/19/22 at 11:25 AM the walk-in refrigerator revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and resident council meeting, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in a dignified manner for Resident #28 and Resident #43. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: Resident #28 and Resident #43. Facility Census: 48. Findings Included: a) Resident #28 During an interview on 09/19/22 at 1:17 PM, Resident #28 stated I need help, nobody will help you here, I will not come back to this place again. When you don't feel good, and you just want to lay down. The resident then started crying and stated, The girl brought me back from the dining room and just left me and I just wanted to go to bed. Resident #28 pulled her call light at 1:20 PM. A nurses Aide came into the room and turned off the call light at 1:22 PM. Resident stated she wanted to lay down, a Nurse aide, stated I will ask your aide and left the room. At 1:25 PM Two nurse aides came into the Residents room with a sit to stand lift to assist the resident to bed. Resident #28 stated thank you, I am not sure how long I would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure when a resident self administered medications, the interdisciplinary team had determined this practice was clinically appropriate. This deficient practice was identified during a random opportunity for discovery when Resident #36 was observed in the dining room to have a medication cup with medications present. The licensed nurse passing the medications was not present to supervise the administration and left the medications with the resident. Resident identifier: Resident #36. Census: 48. Findings included: a.) Policy review A review of the policy, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, revision date: 10/15/22, noted staff were required to complete a process to determine if the resident could safely administer medications. After a determination was made to allow self- administration, a physicians order would be obtained, and that determination of self-administration of medication would be included in the care plan process. b) Resident #36 Observation An observation on 09/26/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident council minutes, policy review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to consider the voiced concerns of residents in resident council as grievances. The facility failed to act promptly to investigate resident grievances concerning issues of Television and meal delivery. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents living in the facility. Facility census: 48. Findings Included: a) Policy Review A review of the facility policy titled Grievances, Suggestions or Concerns-Rehab/Skilled with a revision date of 09/16/21 found the following. .4. The grievance will be documented on the Suggestion or Concern (GSS #213) and submitted to the grievance official. 5. The grievance official will route the GSS #213 to the appropriate department manager as soon as is reasonably possible. 6. An investigation must be completed for all grievances b) Resident Council Meeting During a Resident Council meeting held on 09/20/22 at 10:00 AM the following concerns were presented: Confidential interviews with the Resident group found the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the physician or resident representative in a timely manner when the resident suffered a change in condition. Resident #4 suffered side effects from the medication Seroquel and the physcian was not notified of the side effects. The facility also failed to notify Resident #8's representative when they had an incident involving a medicated cream. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: Resident #4 and Resident #8. Facility census: 48. Findings Included: a) Resident #4 A review of the facility policy titled Medication Documentation-R/S, LTC with a revision date of 09/22/22 found the following. .7. Notify physician of any side effects, adverse reaction, medication error, corrective action taken, consequences or any reading outside the parameters established by the physician. A review of Resident #4's medical record on 09/27/22 revealed a physician order dated 04/06/22 for Quetiapine Fumarate Tablet (Seroquel) 100 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to promote privacy during medical treatments for two (2) of six (6) treatments observed during the Long Term Care Survey Process (LTSP). This deficient practice was identified for Resident #43 during two (2) separate wound treatments. Resident identifier: Resident #43. Census: 48. Findings included: a) Resident #43 During a treatment observation, on 9/19/22 at 04:45 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #35 entered Resident #43's room to complete a dressing change to the residents upper legs. RN #35 did not close the door or pull the privacy curtain to provide privacy to the resident during the dressing change. RN #35 assisted the resident with removal of clothing exposing the groin and thigh area where the area was being treated. At this time, residents and staff were observed in the hallway while the treatment was being done. An interview with RN #35, on 09/20/22 at 10:14 AM, verified the door remained open during the treatment and the curtain was not pulled to provide privacy during the treatment. RN #35 further stated, during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations of abuse and neglect, including serious bodily injury, were reported immediately, and failed to ensure the results of the investigations were reported to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and Adult Protective Services (APS) where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. Resident #4 sustained serious bodily injury in the facility and the injury was not reported within two (2) hours of staff's knowledge of the severity of the resident's injuries sustained from a fall. This deficient practice was identified through a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: Resident #4. Census: 48. Findings included: a) Resident #4 An interview, with Resident #4, on 09/19/22 at 12:49 PM, revealed the resident stating she had fallen in the facility and broke her face. A review of the electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that a copy of the Notice of Transfer was sent to to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This was true for one (1) of two (2) reviewed for the care area of hospitalization during the Long-term care process. Resident Identifiers: Resident # 249. Facility Census: 48 Findings Included: a) Resident # 249 During an interview on 09/19/22 at 1:37 PM Resident # 249's Husband stated She has been in the hospital a few times. A medical record review on 09/19/22 revealed Resident #249 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The records did not reveal a notification of Transfer was sent to the Ombudsman. During an interview on 09/19/22 at 11:20 AM the Social Worker stated Resident # 249's transfer to the hospital on [DATE] was not reported to the office of the State of the Long-term Care Ombudsman. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to implement the care plan for Residents #36 and #38. This was true for two (2) of 26 sampled residents. Resident identifiers: #36 and #38. Facility Census: 48 Findings Included: a) Resident #36 An interview with Resident #36 on 09/19/22 at 1:30 PM, revealed the resident stating he/she had not been receiving rehabilitation services that had been ordered to help with physical limitations identified. A review of the comprehensive person centered care plan for Resident #36 showed the resident had a problem / focus area identified for the need for restorative intervention due to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit / limited physical mobility related to hemiplegia as evidenced by limited mobility. The approaches for Resident #36 included the following restorative measures to assist the resident with the identified problem: - Omnicycle level 2 up to 15 minutes to bilateral lower extremities 3-6 times weekly PRN (as needed )to help maintain strength. - Active range of motion to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, family interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide care required to maintain proper nail care to a resident who is dependent for Activities Of Daily Living (ADL) care. This was true for one (1) of one (1) reviewed for ADL's during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #249 Facility Census: 48 Findings Included: a) Resident #249 During a resident representative interview on 09/19/22 at 1:37 PM Resident #249's Husband stated my only concerns are her jagged toenails and fingernails. They look awful, just look at them. An observation on 09/19/22 at 1:39 PM Resident #249's toenails were long and jagged and fingernails were broken and jagged and fingernail polish was faded. A medical record review on 09/20/22 revealed on 05/05/22 a physician order which stated: Foot Assessment: Assess both feet for abnormalities and clean and trim nails Q(every) month. every day shift every 4 weeks on Tuesday for Foot Assessment. A review of Treatment Administration Record (TAR) was void of evidence of documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care to residents with pressure ulcers consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the LTCSP. Resident identifier: Resident # 41 Findings included: a) Resident #41 A review of the electronic medical record for Resident #41, showed a physician's order for the resident to have bilateral heel boots while in bed because of an identified risk for pressure ulcer development and a history or pressure ulcers. An observation, on 09/21/22 at 09:37 AM, revealed the resident lying in bed with no heel boots in place as ordered by the physician. An interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #35, on 09/21/22 at 09:37 AM, verified Resident #41 did not have the heel boots in place during the observation made. An additional interview with RN #35 , on 09/21/22 at 09:42 AM, revealed staff had removed the heel boots and had forgotten to put them back on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    ensure the environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: Resident # 8. Facility Census: 48. Findings Included: a) Resident #8 A review of facility policy titled Incident Report-Rehab/Skilled with a revision date of 04/05/22 found the following. .Procedure .4 The investigation will be initiated by a supervisor or a member of the investigation team as soon as possible after the incident occurred. 5. The investigation team consisting of the administrator, the director of nursing services and social services will review each incident no later than the next business day. Ensure that someone is assigned to complete the investigation and that the care plan has been update with new interventions put into place. A Review of Resident #8's medical record on 09/27/22 revealed an incident that occurred on 09/14/22. A incident report/note dated on 09/14/22 at 8:05 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #40 (typed as written) stated: Nursing Description: CNA staff reported to this nurse that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a urinary catheter received care and treatment to prevent infections. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed with urinary catheters. Resident #43 was observed to have the catheter bag laying on the floor. Resident identifier: Resident #43. Census: 48 Findings included: a) Policy and Procedure for Catheter Care A review of the Policy and Procedure for Catheter: Insertion and Removal, Drainage Bags, Irrigation and Specimen, dated 08/24/22, showed under the area of Catheter tubing/drainage bags : Catheter tubing should never be allowed to touch the floor. Non-obstructed downhill flow is maintained at all times. b) Resident #43 An observation on 09/20/22 at 08:13 AM, revealed the catheter bag for Resident #43 was found to be laying on the floor. An interview, on 09/20/22 at 08:13 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #35, verified the urinary catheter bag was laying on the floor and should have been hanging from the bed off the floor, in accordance with facilty policy for catheter care. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services that were in accordance with professional standard practice. A Nebulizer treatment T-piece was hanging from the residents' bed railing. This observation was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: Resident #27. Facility census: 48. Findings Included: a) Resident #27 A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, Safety, Mask Types- R/S, LTC, Therapy & Rehab with a revision date of 06/29/22 found the following. .11. When not in use, store in zip lock/plastic bag . During initial tour of the facility on 09/19/22 at 12:08 PM Resident # 27's Nebulizer treatment T-piece was hanging from the resident's bed railing. During an interview on 09/19/22 at 12:12 PM Registered Nurse #9 acknowledged the Nebulizer treatment T-piece should have been stored in a bag and not hanging from the bed railing. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the pharmacist failed to identify and report the irregularity of Resident #4 Seroquel, as evidenced by documentation of side effects by nursing. This was true for one (1) of five (5) reviewed for unnecessary medications during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: Resident #4. Facility Census: 48 Findings Included: a) Resident # 4 A review of Resident #4's medical record on 09/27/22 of revealed a physician order dated 04/06/22 Quetiapine Fumarate Tablet (Seroquel) 100 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. A review of Resident #4's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 09/2022 revealed from 09/01/22 to 09/12/22 had documented yes for side effects daily. A review of the Resident #4's MAR for 08/2022 revealed on 08/31/22 Resident #4 had side effects from the medication. During an interview on 09/27/22 at 10:26 AM the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) stated the (SE) on Resident #4's MAR is a code for side effects and when a resident has a side effect the nurse marks yes/no. When they answer yes it triggers a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy and procedure and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the medication room controlled substance box was double locked. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 48 Findings Included: a) On 9/20/22 at 9:10 AM while observing the medication storage room, the controlled medication double lock box in the refrigerator was not locked. This was confirmed on 9/20/22 at 9:10 AM with Registered Nurse #9. According to their Policy for Medications: Acquisition Receiving Dispensing and Storage dated 2/08/22 If the medication requires a refrigerator, these need to be locked in a separate container which they failed to do. .

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide nutritional adequacy by providing inconsistent portions of the food to maintain perimeters of health. This failed practice had the potential to a limited number of residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen. Facility Census: 48. Findings Included: a) Resident #41 During a dining observation of the main dining room on 09/26/22 at 12:09 PM, Resident # 41 received a very small amount of ground meat with gravy, a small portion of mashed potatoes. Resident #41's meal tray ticket diet order level 2 no restrictions did not have an order for smaller portions of meat/protein. An observation on 09/26/22 of several other residents' lunch tray no portions on the lunch trays were consistent. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 12:20 PM the Nutrition Food and Service Supervisor was asked the question about portion sizes? She stated we use a specified scoop size, we have a spreadsheet with the menu and diets and it states what size scoop to use. Resident #41 should be getting a four (4)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #249, and #46 medical record was complete and accurate. The Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were not completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End of Life Care. This is true for three (3) of 18 reviewed for the Long-Term Care Survey Process . Resident Identifiers: Resident #249 and Resident #46. Facility Census: 48. Findings Included: a) Resident #249 A medical record review on 09/19/22 revealed a POST form on Resident # 249's chart signed and dated by the physician on 09/12/22 which was void of the following: Section F entitled Signature Health Care Provider Printed Full Name: required; was void of physician's name During an interview on 09/20/22 at 8:21 AM the Social Worker acknowledged the POST form did not contain the physician's printed name which is required. During an interview on 09/20/22 at 8:32 AM the Unit Secretary #41, acknowledged the POST form did not contain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Glenville Health & RehabGlenville, WV 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Highland Ridge Rehab CenterDublin, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5Mountain View Care CenterRipley, WV 1 of 5New Martinsville Health & RehabNew Martinsville, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Winchester Health & RehabilitationWinchester, VA 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Laurelhurst Post Acute & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Lynn Care CenterFront Royal, VA 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Blue Ridge Therapy ConnectionStuart, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BELINGTON OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/25/2023
NVH BELINGTON OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST63%since 08/25/2023
OPCO PH BELINGTON LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST38%since 08/25/2023
WAGONER, OODAYYUNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/25/2023
IDELS, SHIMONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/08/2024

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+20.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$112K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 5%Other / private 10%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $112K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$329per resident / day
operating cost
$9,998per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$414per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515116. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next