Williamsburg Post Acute & Rehabilitation
1235 S Mount Vernon Avenue, Williamsburg, VA 23185 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (757) 229-4121 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.8% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 42.0% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.8% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.1% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.5% | 21.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.0% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.5% | 73.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.2% | 22.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.7% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.69 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.48 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 9.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 48% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.2%CMS range 22.4–49.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 6.5–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 9.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 15.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 12.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 77.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.4–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 95.4 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.97 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure routine medications were available to be administered to 3 residents (#'s 1, 2, and 3) in a survey sample of 3 residents.1, For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to ensure that routine medications were available for administration to the resident. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke), heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, hypertension, pneumonia, history of repeated falls, major depressive disorder, and insomnia. Resident #1's most recent BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) scored the Resident 15 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 is wheelchair dependent and has left sided paralysis due to the history of 2 CVA's (strokes), the most recent being in October of 2025. Resident #1 has left sided paralysis and uses a wheelchair for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for 3 residents (Resident #'s 1, 2 and 3) of 3 Residents in the survey sample. 1. For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to ensure the resident received Levoquin (an antibiotic), Umeclidinium-Vilanterol (an inhaler for COPD) and dexamethasone (a steroid) per physician orders. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke), heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, hypertension, pneumonia, history of repeated falls, major depressive disorder, and insomnia. Resident #1's most recent BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) scored the Resident 15 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 is wheelchair dependent and has left sided paralysis due to the history of 2 CVA's (strokes), the most recent being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to designate an individual as the infection preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) for the facility.Findings include:The facility administration failed to designate an individual who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control practices to oversee the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. On 11/12/25 a review was conducted on the facility's infection control binder which revealed the Infection Control Tracking Log (surveillance log) dated 7/1/25 through 7/31/25 was incomplete for 5 residents for onset date, site, infection related diagnosis, culture/labs/diagnostic test results, organism, antibiotics, isolation, whether infection was healthcare associated infection or not and date resolved. The Infection Control binder was further reviewed and revealed that from May to present numerous months were incomplete for infection control tracking logs, McGeer's criteria, mapping and monthly reports. On 11/12/25 an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to notify the physician and resident representative of changes in the residents' condition for 2 of 3 (Residents #1 and # 2) residents in a survey sample of 3 Residents.The findings included: 1.For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to notify the physician of changes in condition, and availability of medications. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke), heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, hypertension, pneumonia, history of repeated falls, major depressive disorder, and insomnia. Resident #1's most recent BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) scored the Resident 15 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 is wheelchair dependent and has left sided paralysis due to the history of 2 CVA's (strokes), the most recent being in October of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure adherance to the expiration dates for over-the counter (OTC) medications in bulk containers. The findings included: On 10/23/24 at 3:30 PM, medication checks of one medication cart was conducted on the Colonial Unit. Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure adherence to the expiration dates for over-the-counter (OTC) medications in bulk containers. The findings included: On 10/23/24 at 3:30 PM, medication cart checks were conducted on the Colonial Unit. One bottle of Thiamine Vitamin B-1 had an expiration date of 7/2024 and a marked open date of 10/17/24. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 said the medication should have been removed from the medication cart, and could not explain why the expired drug was marked as open on 10/17/24, well after the expiration date. RN#1 stated it was a facility policy to dispose of expired medications at least within 30 days of the expiration date with another nurse. The Unit Manager was present, and the Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain the professional standards of medication and treatment administration in nursing practice for one Resident (Residents #63) in a survey sample of 27 Residents. For Resident #63, the facility staff failed to administer treatments and pain medications for a dependent Resident with wounds and pain. The findings included: Resident #63's diagnoses included; Osteomyelitis right ankle and foot with amputation, acute and chronic respiratory failure with continuous oxygen use, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety and PTSD, foot drop, and hypothyroidism. Resident #63's most recent MDS (minimum data set) was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #63 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, or no cognitive impairment. Resident #63 was also coded as requiring extensive to total dependence on one to two staff members to perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store medication in a secure location for 1 resident, Resident #61, out of a survey sample of 27 residents. The findings included: For Resident #61, facility staff failed to store prescribed antifungal powder in a secure location to ensure only authorized persons had access to the medication. On 4/16/24 at approximately 2:45 PM, Surveyor B observed a 3 ounce bottle which read, Antifungal Powder with Miconazole Nitrate 2%, expiration date 01/2025, with a prescription label from an outside provider attached to the bottle with Resident #61's name, date of birth , and prescriber/pharmacy information. The bottle was located on top of Resident #61's bedside table next to the head of his bed. On 4/16/24 at 2:50 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #61 who stated, My wife brought that [referencing the bottle of antifungal powder] in the other day, it has been there [referencing his bedside table] a couple of days, I don't know if it is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to properly store, label and date food items, and clean the floors in 2 out of 4 refrigerators/freezers located within the facility's main kitchen. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to label and date food items located within the vegetable and meat freezers. On 4/17/24 at approximately 2:00 PM, an interview and kitchen tour was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). A partial bag of crinkle-cut french fries, which had been previously opened, was observed in the vegetable freezer, however the bag was not labeled or dated. A partial bag of round meat patties, which had been previously opened, was observed in the meat freezer, however the bag was not labeled or dated. The DM stated, These bags should be labeled and dated, I will dispose of these things right now. The DM also stated, Labels are needed to identify food items so that potential food allergans can be identified before serving it to people and dating food lets us know when it may no longer be safe to serve. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, having the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. The findings included: The facility staff failed to maintain an effective QAPI program that was sustained during transitions in leadership and staffing, regarding call bells, abuse protocol, and resident and staff immunizations. Throughout the survey conducted 10/17/2023 - 10/20/2023, the survey team inspected and investigated the facility's systems and processes regarding correcting previously cited deficiencies and resident care concerns. It was noted the facility had several systemic failures and remained out of compliance in several areas that had previously been cited as deficient during a standard survey conducted 04/11/2023 - 04/13/2023. 1. The facility staff failed to maintain an effective QAPI program regarding their resident call bell system and staff response to call bells. On 10/17/2023, the survey team noted that two residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to transmit resident assessments/Minimum Data Set (MDS) in a timely manner to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for 8 residents (Residents #1, #2, #33, #36, #39, #61, #63, and #68) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: 1. For Residents #1, #2, #33, #36, #39, #61, #63, and #68, the facility staff failed to transmit the MDS to the CMS system within the required timeframe of 14 days. On 10/19/2023 at 8:50 a.m. during the completion of the survey process, clinical record reviews were conducted of Residents #1, #2, #33, #36, #39, #61, #63, and #68's MDS assessments with particular attention to the date(s) they were transmitted to CMS. The following was noted: a. Resident #1 had a quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/27/2023, completed on 09/11/2023. This assessment was not transmitted to CMS until 10/16/2023. Review of the transmission batch report revealed this assessment had been rejected by the CMS system; therefore, it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for 5 residents (Residents #124, #125, #274, #275, and #276), in a survey sample of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide education of the risks/benefits about influenza immunization, and offer flu vaccines for Residents #125, #274, #275, and #276. On 10/18/2023, clinical record reviews were performed and revealed the following: Residents #125, #274, #275, and #276, had no immunization information under the immunization tab of their clinical record. The miscellaneous tab and progress notes were reviewed, and revealed no evidence of the residents' immunization status regarding the flu and had no evidence that education had been provided or the vaccine offered. On 10/19/2023 at 4:28 p.m., Surveyor C met with the Director of Nursing (DON), who was also the facility's Infection Preventionist.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide education and offer COVID-19 vaccines for 4 residents (Residents #125, #274, #275, and #276) in a survey sample of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations and 5 staff (Staff #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5). The findings included: 1. For Residents #125, #274, #275 and #276, the facility staff failed to provide COVID-19 immunization, to include education of risks/benefits about COVID-19 immunization. On 10/18/2023, a clinical record review was conducted of each of the residents' clinical charts. There was no information noted that indicated the residents' current COVID-19 immunization status, no evidence they had been educated on the risk/benefits of immunization, and no evidence they had been offered the COVID-19 immunization. On 10/19/2023 at 4:28 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who accessed the clinical records for Residents #125, #274, #275, and #276 and verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and determine if a resident was safe to self-administer medications, for one resident (Resident #14) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #14, who had medications stored in their room, the facility staff failed to assess if Resident #14 was safe to self-administer medications. On 10/17/2023 at approximately 12:40 p.m., observations were conducted of Resident #14's room. Resident #14 was not present in the room. It was noted that Resident #14 had a basket on the bed that contained two blister packets of medications. There was also a 3-drawer plastic storage unit against the wall that had clear drawers and it was observed there was a bottle of Tylenol and 2 cans of jock itch spray present. On 10/17/2023 at 1:33 p.m., Resident #14 was visited in her room. When asked about medications, Resident #14 said, the facility staff give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, facility staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to accommodate the needs of 2 residents (Residents #274 and #70) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #274, who was unable to get out of bed without assistance, the call bell was not in reach; therefore, leaving the resident with no way to call facility staff for assistance. On 10/17/2023 at 1:45 p.m., Resident #274 was visited in his room. The resident was noted to be alert, oriented x4 and a good historian upon interview. The resident was observed lying in bed, was noted to be a bilateral amputee of lower extremities. Resident #274 said, his call bell is the only way he can call for assistance and frequently it is out of reach or has fallen behind the bed. He said he frequently has to get his roommate to use his call bell to get assistance to the room. Resident #274 reports he does not get out of bed. On 10/17/2023 at 1:49 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA B. CNA B was asked about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician and family of a resident's change in medications and change in condition for one resident (Resident #14) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #14, who had a medication change which was not communicated to the family, there was a noted increase in sleeping and she was difficult to arouse following the start of an antipsychotic medication. The facility staff failed to notify the doctor and family member of the change until prompted by survey team. On 10/17/2023, Resident #14 was visited in her room by Surveyor C. Resident #14 was awake, able to engage in conversation with no difficulty, and appeared to have some memory loss. There was no obvious significant hearing deficit noted. On 10/18/2023, Surveyor C visited Resident #14's room on 3 occasions, once mid-morning, once early afternoon, and lastly around 3:30 p.m. Each time, Surveyor C knocked on the resident's room door, entered the room, and called the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a proper Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) to 2 residents (Residents #43 and #70) in a survey sample of 3 residents reviewed for such notices. The findings included: For Residents #43 and #70, the facility staff failed to utilize a CMS approved SNF ABN form, which provided the option for the resident to select/choose to continue services and pay for the care without Medicare being billed. On 10/17/2023, the facility Administrator was asked to provide a listing of residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services, prior to exhausting their benefit days. From this listing, a sample of 3 residents was selected, which included Residents #43 and #70. The notices issued to these residents was requested and received. Review of the SNF ABN forms revealed the following: 1. For Resident #43, the facility staff provided a SNF ABN notice on 09/11/2023, which indicated therapy services were ending. The form provided Resident #43 with 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure freedom from abuse and neglect for 1 resident (Resident #54) in a sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #54, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident was not verbally abused by a CNA who threatened to, and did in fact, neglect the resident's needs. Resident #54 is a [AGE] year-old resident with diagnoses of, but not limited to, bradycardia, chronic kidney disease Stage 3, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of falls, hypertension, muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy. On 10/17/2023, a review of the facility grievance log revealed that on 07/20/2023, Resident #54 was threatened by CNA who stated, If you ring that call bell, I am NOT going to answer it. This grievance was written in the grievance book by the Social Worker (Employee F). A review of the complaint/grievance report read as follows: Resident was wanting air conditioner turned up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, facility staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to protect one resident (Resident #14) from misappropriation of property in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #14, the facility staff failed to protect the resident from a known perpetrator, who had been identified by the facility as a verbal abuser and who had previously financially exploited the resident. The facility staff continued to permit unsupervised and unrestricted access to Resident #14 and her personal possessions by the known perpetrator, which allowed the perpetrator to gain access to Resident #14's bank cards when she had no legal right to possess the items. On [DATE] in the afternoon, Resident #14 was visited in her room. During the interview/conversation, cognitive impairment and difficulty with memory recall was noted. The resident did acknowledge she had been to visit her daughter earlier in the day. Resident #14's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, facility staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to implement the abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy for 2 residents (Residents #54 and #14) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #54, the facility staff failed to implement the abuse/neglect policy when Resident #54 reported to the Social Worker an allegation of abuse/neglect. Resident #54 is a [AGE] year-old resident with diagnoses of, but not limited to, bradycardia, chronic kidney disease Stage 3, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of falls, hypertension, muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy. On 10/17/2023, a review of the facility grievance log revealed that on 07/20/2023 Resident #54 was threatened by CNA who stated, If you ring that call bell, I am NOT going to answer it. This grievance was written in the grievance book by the Social Worker (Employee F). A review of the complaint/grievance report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse/neglect within 24 hours, if the events do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 resident (Resident #54) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #54, the facility staff failed to identify, investigate, and report allegations of abuse to the Administrator. Resident #54 is a [AGE] year-old resident with diagnoses of, but not limited to, bradycardia, chronic kidney disease Stage 3, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of falls, hypertension, muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, and muscle wasting and atrophy. On 10/17/2023, a review of the facility grievance log revealed that on 07/20/2023 Resident #54 was threatened by CNA who stated, If you ring that call bell, I am NOT going to answer it. This grievance was written in the grievance book by the Social Worker (Employee F). A review of the complaint/grievance report read as follows: Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 resident (Resident #54) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #54, the facility staff failed to identify, report, and investigate an allegation of abuse made to the Social Worker on 07/20/2023. Resident #54 is a [AGE] year-old resident with diagnoses of, but not limited to, bradycardia, chronic kidney disease Stage 3, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of falls, hypertension, muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy. On 10/17/2023, a review of the facility grievance log revealed that on 07/20/2023, Resident #54 was threatened by CNA who stated, If you ring that call bell, I am NOT going to answer it. This grievance was written in the grievance book by the Social Worker (Employee F). A review of the complaint/grievance report read as follows: Resident was wanting air conditioner turned up and felt like he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to complete resident assessments/Minimum Data Set (MDS) in a timely manner for 6 Residents (Residents #1, #33, #36, #39, #68 and #274) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: 1. For Residents #1, #33, #36, #39, #68 and #274, the facility staff failed to ensure the timely completion of MDS assessments. On 10/19/2023 at 8:50 a.m. during the completion of the survey process, clinical record reviews were conducted of Residents #1, #33, #36, #39, #68 and #274's MDS assessments with particular attention to the date(s) the assessments were completed. The following was noted: a. Resident #1 had a quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/27/2023. The assessment was completed on 09/11/2023. b. Resident #33 had a quarterly MDS with an ARD date of 09/08/2023. The assessment was completed on 09/30/2023. c. Resident #36 had a quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/01/2023. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for three residents (Residents #125, #70, and #21) in a survey sample of 39 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #125, facility staff failed to implement and/or monitor for changes in behavior related to the use of psychotropic medications and/or dementia. On 10/17/2023 at 12:30 p.m., Resident #125 was observed in bed lying flat on his back. The resident was picking at the bed linens and pulling on his hospital gown repeatedly. The surveyor asked him if he needed help, and he replied in a stream of disjointed words in a rambling response.The surveyor asked Resident #125 his name, and other questions, the resident did not look up or respond to the surveyor. He simply kept picking at the gown, pulling it up, and attempting to disrobe. Review of the physician's orders in the clinical record revealed Resident #125 was currently receiving the following 3 psychotropic medications: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow standards of practice affecting one resident (Resident #14) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #14, the facility staff failed to monitor for changes in condition, and for medication interactions, following the implementation of an antipsychotic medication. On 10/17/2023, Resident #14 was visited in her room by Surveyor C. Resident #14 was awake, able to engage in conversation with no difficulty, and appeared to have some memory loss. There was no obvious significant hearing deficit noted. During the interaction and observations of the room, it was noted by the Surveyor that Resident #14 had multiple over-the-counter medications in the room. They included 2 foil blister packets on the bed, a bottle of Tylenol, and 2 cans of jock itch spray. On 10/18/2023, Surveyor C visited Resident #14's room on 3 occasions, once mid-morning, once early afternoon, and again around 3:30 p.m. Each time, Surveyor C knocked on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, facility staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide assistance to one resident (Resident #274), who was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living, in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #274, the facility staff failed to provide baths to include hair care, which resulted in the resident's hair becoming matted and having to be cut. On 10/17/2023 at 1:58 p.m., Resident #274 was visited in his room. Observations revealed that Resident #274's hair appeared uncombed, and it being matted in the back of his hair was noted. Resident #274 was asked about baths and showers, and he stated he had not been out of bed since his admission, which was 09/27/2023. On 10/18/2023 at 11:14 a.m., Resident #274 was visited in his room again. It was noted that his hair still appeared uncombed, and the resident said he had asked to be shaved and said, They said if they can't get to it today, they will do it tomorrow. Later in the afternoon, Surveyor C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide proper foot care to 1 resident (Resident #67) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #67, the facility staff failed to have her seen by podiatry for cutting her toenails as she is diabetic and on an anti-coagulant medication for history of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA). On 10/17/2023 at approximately 2:00 p.m., Resident #67 was observed in the hall sitting in her wheelchair wearing open toe sandals. Her toenails were clearly visible, and they were jagged and at least 1/4 inch long. Resident #67 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0/15 and could not follow the line of questions. On 10/18/2023 at approximately 11:00 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #67 sitting in her wheelchair in her room and she was not wearing shoes or socks. Her toenails were clearly visible and had not been trimmed. On 10/19/2023 at approximately 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA C who was asked if residents get their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 2 nursing units was safe and free of accident hazards. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that one resident unit was free of accident hazards/over-the-counter medications, which were accessible to residents who are confused and wander. On 10/17/2023 at approximately 12:30 p.m., Surveyor C made observations on one of the nursing units. It was noted in Resident #14's room, multiple items were observed that could pose as a safety hazard to confused residents. The items included over-the-counter medications, Mucinex, Nauzene, Tylenol, and jock itch spray. During the above observation, it was noted there were residents who wander ambulating independently within the hall. During residents' interviews, Resident #38 verbalized there is a resident who wanders into her room and takes her items. On 10/18/2023 during mid-morning, observations were made in Resident #14's room. During this observation, the Mucinex, Nauzene, Tylenol, and jock itch spray were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician to 1 resident (Resident #53) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #53, the facility staff failed to administer Gabapentin as ordered by the physician. On 10/29/2023 during clinical record review, it was found that the facility staff failed to acquire the medication, Gabapentin, for administration to Resident #53. Resident #54 had an order for Gabapentin as follows: Gabapentin Oral Capsule 100 MG (Gabapentin) Give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime related to OTHER IDIOPATHIC PERIPHERAL AUTONOMIC NEUROPATHY (G90.09) -Start Date 10/05/2023. The following excerpts are from the progress notes for Resident #53 regarding the Gabapentin: 10/13/2023 9:35 PM Gabapentin Oral Capsule 100 MG Give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime related to OTHER IDIOPATHIC PERIPHERAL AUTONOMIC NEUROPATHY Medication on order from the pharmacy, signed prescription…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to appropriately label medication with accepted professional principals in 1 of 2 medication refrigerators. The findings included: For the medication refrigerator located on the skilled unit, the staff failed to date when opened a multi-use vial of Tubersol solution used for Tuberculin testing. On 10/19/2023 at approximately 4:00 p.m., an inspection of the medication room and refrigerator was conducted. LPN F was asked what was missing on the multi-use vial of Tubersol found in the refrigerator. LPN F looked at the bottle and stated the date should have been placed on the label when the vial was opened. When asked why that should happen, LPN F stated, The vial is only good for 30 days. If you do not label it, you do not know when it was opened and therefore you will not know when the expiration date is. According to the manufacturer instructions on the product: Sanofi Pasteur - TUBERSOL® Package Insert. A vial of TUBERSOL which has been entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, facility staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure a functioning call bell was present for one resident (Resident #59) in a survey sample of 39 residents. The findings included: For Resident #59, the facility staff failed to ensure a call bell was present and functioning in the bathroom. On 10/17/2023 at 1:49 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA B. CNA B was asked about the call bells, to explain their purpose, where they are located, etc. CNA B stated, The call bell is how the residents let us know if they need something. On 10/18/2023 at 8:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #59. During this interview, Resident #59 said that her call bell in the bathroom does not work. She did acknowledge she has had falls previously in the bathroom. Surveyor C went to the bathroom and pulled the string/pull cord, which did not engage the call bell/light and auditory alarm for staff. Resident #59 reported the call bell had not worked for about a month, which was the length of time she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-20 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to post in a readily accessible place, inspection reports with a plan of corrections in effect, with respect to any surveys conducted during the past 3 years for all 72 residents residing in the facility. The facility's non-compliance has the potential to impact all residents and their family's ability to make informed decisions regarding knowledge of the facility's regulatory compliance history. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to have readily accessible to residents and family members, the survey results with any plan of correction in effect for the surveys conducted for the past 3 preceding years. On 10/18/2023 at 1:24 p.m., Surveyor C observed the facility's survey results which were in the lobby, outside of the entrance to the dining room. It was noted that multiple survey reports (CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] form 2567) had a watermark that read, POC [Plan of Correction] Not Final across the page. The following survey reports were noted to be incomplete: a. An abbreviated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 1.7 | +2.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA 6 SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2022 |
| PHILLIPS, CHARLES | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/01/2022 |
| IDELS, SHIMON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2022 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495235. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.