No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Highland Ridge Rehab Center

5872 Hanks Street, Dublin, VA 24084 · For profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (540) 674-4193 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (540) 674-4193 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 46 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
118 Broad St · (540) 674-8805 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
100 Giles Ave · (540) 674-4816 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5911 Lee Hwy · (540) 249-1060 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5670 Thornspring Church Road · (540) 980-2927

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.4%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms65.9%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.5%15.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.6%20.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.3%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.7%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.9%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.0%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.5%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.7%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.2%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.711.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.301.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 214 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
37.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.6%CMS range 43.4–57.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.9–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.7–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
64.2%
Total nursing turnover
76.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 124.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to meet the daily nutritional and dietary needs of all residents that receive nutrition by oral means and the facility staff failed to maintain an overall system to manage and execute its food and nutritional services during a lapse in food service management. The findings included:Tray line was observed on 2/25/26 at 11:45 AM. The menu consisted of Swedish meatballs, egg noodles, and pacific blend vegetables. During observations of the tray-line, no special diets were noted to be called out other than regular diets, ground consistencies, and/or puree consistencies. When asked why no carbohydrate-controlled diets had been called out, other staff #1 stated, they only have one resident on a carb-controlled diet and that resident's spouse calls the kitchen to determine the resident's meal choice for that service. When asked who was cooking the evening meal, other staff #2 stated either the administrator or the human resource director, as they did not have another cook and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility kitchen and in 4 of 4 unit pantries/nutrition rooms.The findings included:For the facility, the facility staff failed to discard out-of-date food items, failed to date and label perishable food items, failed to maintain clean dietary equipment, failed to store food under sanitary conditions, failed to utilize hair and beard restraints for dietary personnel, and failed to practice proper hand hygiene.An initial tour of the kitchen on 2/24/2026 at 10:51 AM was completed with the Registered Dietician (RD).Observation of the dry storage area revealed the following items:7 boxes of Quaker barley with a best by (BB) date of 8/30/251 large bag of Hershey's chocolate chips with a BB date of 9/3/25 that was open to air and not sealed1 bag of French-fried onions with a BB date of 12/16/241 large bag of graham cracker crumbs open to air and not sealed5 boxes of thickened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide and/or review a baseline care plan (BCP) for 5 of 25 residents, Residents #6, #2, #13, #126, and #134 and failed to complete a BCP for 1 of 25 residents, Resident #84. The findings included:1. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to provide the resident with a copy of their BCP. Resident #6's clinical record listed the resident as being their own responsible party. Diagnoses included sepsis and chronic pulmonary edema. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #6's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/30/26 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating Resident #6 was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. During the clinical record review, the surveyor was unable to find evidence that Resident #6 was provided with a copy of their BCP. On 02/25/26 at 5:10 p.m., during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 this nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to include the resident and/or resident representative in reviews and/or revisions of the comprehensive person-centered care plan for (1) one of (25) twenty-five sample residents, Resident #50 and the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for (3) three of (25) sampled residents, Resident #116, Resident #11, and Resident #32. The findings included: 1. For Resident #50 the facility staff failed to include the resident and/or resident representative in reviews and/or revisions of the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Resident #50's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, depression, obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiomegaly, tachycardia, metabolic encephalopathy, weakness, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/14/26 assigned the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living care for 7 of 25 resident's, Resident #6, #84, #42, #51, #62, #67, and #116.The findings included:1. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to provide nail care. Resident #6 was observed to have long, jagged fingernails with debris present under the nails. Resident #6's diagnoses included sepsis, and chronic pulmonary edema. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #6's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/30/26 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating Resident #6 was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Section GG (functional abilities) was coded to indicate this resident required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene. Resident #6's comprehensive care plan included the intervention remind the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to assess 2 of 25 residents for self-administration of medications, Residents #32 and #116.The findings included:1. For Resident #32, the facility staff failed to assess the resident for self-administration of medications. Resident #32 had a provider order for Systane eye drops two times a day for dry eye may leave at bedside. Resident #32's diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, and diabetes. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #32's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/06/26 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible 15 points, indicating Resident #32 was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. On 02/24/26 at 12:35 p.m., during an interview with Resident #32 an observation was made of Systane eye drops, Voltaren cream, and Neosporin ointment on the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide 2 of 3 residents with the appropriate beneficiary notices, Residents #36 and #42. The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide Resident #36 with an Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) and failed to provide Resident #42 with a Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC). Resident #36's diagnoses included sepsis and acute respiratory failure. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #36's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/19/26 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating Resident #36 was cognitively intact. Resident #42's diagnoses included chronic systolic congestive heart failure and diabetes. Section C of Resident #42's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 02/03/26 included a BIMS score of 15, indicating Resident #42 was cognitively intact. On 02/25/26, the surveyor requested from the Social Worker Assistant notices that were provided to Resident #36 and Resident #42 regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the office of the state long-term care ombudsman of a resident transfer/discharge for (1) one of (25) twenty-five sampled residents, Resident #13. The findings included:For Resident #13, the facility staff failed to notify the office of the state long-term care ombudsman of a transfer/discharge to a higher level of care on 1/30/26. Resident #13's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, psoas muscle abscess, sepsis due to streptococcus, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease-stage 3, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, muscle weakness, and malnutrition. The most recent admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 131/26, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 8 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was moderately impaired in cognition. An order progress note dated 1/30/26 read in part, .May send to ER (emergency room at hospital) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 25 residents, Resident #5 and Resident #72.The findings included:1. For Resident #5 the facility staff failed to follow up on pharmacist recommendations. Resident #5's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to personal history of traumatic brain injury, major depressive disorder, and metabolic encephalopathy.Resident #5's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 12/14/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Section N, medications, coded the resident as receiving antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antibiotic.Resident #5's clinical record was reviewed and contained a Pharmacy/Pharmacy Consultant Note dated 09/23/25 which read in part, Medication Regimen Review Completed (X) Recommendations written to provider, please see pharmacy report for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to safely store drugs and/or biologicals in a locked and secure manner for 2 of 25 residents, Resident #4 and #32.Joy1. For Resident #4, the facility nursing staff left hydrocortisone in the resident's room unattended.Resident #4's diagnoses included, Parkinson's disease, respiratory failure, and epilepsy.Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #4's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/13/26 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating Resident #4 was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making.On 02/24/2026, during initial tour, the surveyor observed a white cream in a clear plastic medicine cup sitting on the top of an extended outlet box. On 02/24/2026, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 this staff stated the cream was hydrocortisone and she had placed it there. Resident #4's clinical record included a provider order dated 02/21/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to address resident concerns regarding food services. The findings included:For the facility, the facility staff failed to adequately address resident complaints about the food. During the course of the survey, multiple resident interviews were conducted and multiple residents complained about the taste and temperature of the food and not having snacks available. A review of Resident Council Minutes dated 12/30/25 read in part, .Residents stated it is a waste of time to voice any concerns with dietary.nothing is getting done.still not receiving snacks A review of Resident Council Minutes dated 1/27/26 read in part, .Residents stated the eggs and vegetables are watery when served.Residents are stating the hot plates are not hot when meals arrive and their food is cold .will send an email to Dietary Manager to follow up with these concerns. A review of Resident Council Minutes dated 2/24/26 read in part, .All residents agree the food is cold when they receive it.All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow established infection control procedures.The findings included:During a medication pass and pour observation, observed the nurse touching medications with her bare hands. For Resident # 42 observed an incentive spirometer under the resident's bed, and for Resident #92, failed to bag CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) mask. Linens were observed on the floor in room B-6 and A-6, A-bed side.On 02/25/26 at 8:00 am, while preparing to observe a medication pass and pour, registered nurse (RN) #2 was observed dispensing medication from the medication card into her bare hand and placing them in the medication cup. During the medication pass and pour observations, RN #2 removed a capsule from the medication cup with her bare hand, opened it and poured the contents into a cup of pudding.Linens were observed laying on the floor of room B-6 on 02/25/26 at 8:40 am. A wet washcloth was observed laying on the floor of room A-6 on 02/25/26 at 1:20 pm.An incentive spirometer was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-05 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to employ an infection preventionist with the required training prior to assumption of the role.The findings included:On 9/5/25, members of the survey team made multiple observations of residents requiring EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) and/or TBP (transmission-based precautions) without proper notification/signage and PPE available to staff, residents and/or visitors. On 9/5/25 at 2:54 PM-surveyors met with interim administrator (ADM), interim director of nursing (DON), regional director of clinical services and licensed practical nurse #1 (LPN#1). This surveyor inquired about the facility IP (infection preventionist) and the DON informed surveyor the previous IP left employment at the facility on 7/4/25 and she and the ADM are acting IPs and both agreed neither of them has an IP certification. LPN#1 has an IP certification from 2022 and she agreed that she does not perform the IP role at the facility. Surveyor requested evidence of staff education on infection control procedures for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide a reasonable accommodation of needs for 1 of 16 residents, Resident #15.The findings included:For Resident #15 the facility staff failed to answer the resident's call bell in a timely manner. Resident #15's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, and major depressive disorder.Resident #15's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 07/17/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact.Surveyor spoke with Resident #15 on 09/05/25 at 11:05 am regarding call bell response times. Resident stated that call bell response has been addressed at resident council meetings, but times never get any better, and they have waited up to an hour after ringing call bell. Resident stated that their call bell is currently on, and they thought surveyor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the medical provider orders for medication administration for 1 of 16 sampled residents (Resident #6). The findings included:For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to administer the oral medication, Cyclobenzaprine as ordered by the medical provider. Cyclobenzaprine is a muscle relaxant used to treat skeletal muscle conditions such as pain and injury. Resident #6's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Encephalopathy, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Congestive Heart Failure, Epilepsy, Multiple Rib Fractures Left Side, Fracture of Nasal Bones, Fracture of Left Thumb, and Fracture of Shaft of Left Clavicle. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/23/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #6's clinical record included a medical provider order for Cyclobenzaprine HCL 10 mg by mouth three times a day for muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow and established infection control program for 3 of 10 residents, Resident #15, Resident #12, and Resident #16.The findings included:1.For Resident #15 the facility staff failed to provide and don personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing incontinence care. Resident #15's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to personal history of urinary (tract) infections and resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs. Resident #15's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date 07/17/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #15's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for ISOLATION: the resident requires Enhanced Barrier precautions (EBP) due to colonization of MDRO (multi drug-resistant organism). Interventions for this plan include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care for 5 of 18 dependent care residents, Resident's #2, #1, #12, #13 and #17. The findings included: 1. For Resident #2, the facility staff failed to provide ADL care regarding bathing. Resident #2 was at the facility for 21 days. During this 21 day timeframe the facility staff documented the resident had received 1 shower. This was a closed record review. Resident #2's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, depressive disorder, and dementia. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #2's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with and assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/02/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15 points. Section GG (functional abilities and goals) was coded to indicate Resident #2 was dependent in the area of shower/bathe self. Resident #2's comprehensive care plan included the focus area has ADL care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the residents call system was within reach for 1 of 13 current residents, Resident #1. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #1's call system was in reach. Resident #1 was observed up in their wheelchair the call system was placed on the bed and out of reach of this resident. Resident #1's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, repeated falls, diabetes, hearing loss, and difficulty in walking. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #1's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/28/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of a possible 15 points. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan included the interventions encourage the resident to use bell to call for assistance, ensure/provide a safe environment, and call light in reach. On 01/02/24 at 10:59 a.m., two surveyors observed Resident #1 up in their wheelchair in their room. Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 13 current residents, Resident #17. The findings included: For Resident #17 the facility staff failed to ensure a clean environment. Resident #17's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to adult failure to thrive and other specified disorders of the skin and subcutaneous tissues related to radiation. Resident #17's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 10/13/23 assigned the resident brief interview for mental status score of 5 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Surveyor observed Resident #17 in his room on 01/03/24 at 4:30 pm. Resident was resting in bed with family member at bedside. Resident's room was clean in appearance at this time. Surveyor asked resident and family member if room was cleaned regularly, and family member stated that at times there was debris (food scraps) on the floor when they came to visit. Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow up on a grievance for 1 of 5 closed record reviews, Resident #2. The findings included: The facility staff failed to follow up on a grievance filed by the Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP). Resident #2's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, depressive disorder, and dementia. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #2's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with and assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/02/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15 points. On 01/02/24 at 4:05 p.m., the surveyor requested from the Social Worker (SW) any grievances regarding Resident #2. The SW stated they had taken a grievance from the family of this resident; they had given the grievance concerns to the Director of Nursing (DON) who gave it to the previous Unit Manager. The SW stated this grievance was not followed up on. The SW provided the surveyor a copy of this form. The section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for the administration of medications for 1 of 13 current residents, Resident #14. The findings included: For Resident #14 the facility staff documented medications as administered when they were not. Resident #14's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, pain in unspecified joint, and chronic pain syndrome. Resident #14's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 10/16/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Surveyor spoke with Resident #14 on 01/03/23 at 4:45 pm. Surveyor asked Resident #14 if they ever had any problems getting their scheduled medications, and resident stated the nurse practitioner was supposed to be ordering them a pain patch and some ointment for pain, but the nurse had told them that it hadn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 13 current residents, Resident #14. The findings included: For Resident #14 the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for the administration of the medication gabapentin. Resident #14's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, pain in unspecified joint, and chronic pain syndrome. Resident #14's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 10/16/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #14's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for the resident has acute and chronic pain r/t (related to) Lt (left) BKA (below knee amputation), Morbid Obesity, Neuropathy, Osteoarthritis, Gout. Interventions for this care plan include Administer analgesia as per orders. Resident #14's clinical record was reviewed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 of 13 current residents, Resident #14. The findings included: For Resident #14 the facility staff failed to ensure the medications gabapentin and methadone were available for administration. Resident #14's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, pain in unspecified joint, and chronic pain syndrome. Resident #14's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 10/16/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #14's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for the resident has acute and chronic pain r/t (related to) Lt (left) BKA (below knee amputation), Morbid Obesity, Neuropathy, Osteoarthritis, Gout. Interventions for this care plan include Administer analgesia as per orders. Resident #14's clinical record was reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 13 current residents was free of significant medication error, Resident #14. The findings included: For Resident #14 the facility staff failed to administer the antibiotic medication, Cefepime per the physician's orders. Resident #14's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, pain in unspecified joint, and chronic pain syndrome. Resident #14's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 10/16/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #14's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, Cefepime HCl Injection Solution Reconstituted 1 GM (gram) (Cefepime HCl). Use 1 gram intravenously every 8 hours to wound infection for 7 days -Start Date- 08/30/2023. Resident #14's electronic medication administration record for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to assist residents in obtaining dental care from an outside source for 1 of 13 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #15. The findings included: For Resident #15, the facility staff delayed scheduling a dental consult for three (3) months and failed to obtain an appointment with an oral surgeon as requested by the referring dentist. Resident #15's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/12/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 1/03/24 at 4:30 PM, surveyor spoke with Resident #15 who stated they had a fall in the bathroom when the support bar gave way and fell from the wall causing them to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to operate in compliance with all applicable Virginia state regulations as evidenced by failing to determine if a potential resident was a registered sex offender prior to admission for 1 of 13 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #8. The findings included: According to Virginia Code 12VAC5-371-150 (H): Prior to admission, each nursing facility shall determine if a potential resident is a registered sex offender when the potential resident is anticipated to have a length of stay: 1. Greater than three days; or 2. In fact stays longer than three days. For Resident #8, the facility staff verified the resident's sex offender status six days following admission to the facility. Resident #8's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Dominant Side, Adult Failure to Thrive, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 13 current residents, Resident #1. The findings included: Resident #1's clinical record included conflicting information regarding their current code status. Resident #1's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, repeated falls, diabetes, hearing loss, and difficulty in walking. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #1's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of a possible 15 points. Resident #1's clinical record included the following documents: Face sheet that included the documentation CPR. Physician orders dated [DATE] code status was CPR. A DDNR order form dated [DATE] indicating the resident was a DNR (do not resuscitate). Progress note dated [DATE] and signed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) documenting Resident #1's code status a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow established infection control guidelines for 2 of 13 current residents, Resident #1 and #13. The findings included: 1. For Resident #1, the surveyor observed dirty linen in the floor of Resident #1's bathroom. Resident #1's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, repeated falls, diabetes, hearing loss, and difficulty in walking. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #1's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/28/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of a possible 15 points. On 01/02/24 at 10:59 a.m., the surveyor observed dirty linen in the corner of Resident #1's bathroom. This resident was in a private room. On 01/02/24 at 12:13 p.m., during a second observation the surveyor again observed the dirty linen in the bathroom floor. On 01/02/24 at 1:30 p.m., the dirty linen was observed to remain in the bathroom floor. On top of the linen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and resident interview the facility staff failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 1 of 4 shower rooms in the facility. The findings included: For the shower room on C-wing of the facility, there was an odor of urine and mildew, a cabinet labeled Keep cabinet locked at all times!!! was found unlocked, shampoo and body wash were lying on the shower stretcher, and a shoe was lying in the bathroom floor. On 04/24/23 at 3:15 pm, surveyor interviewed Resident #62. Resident #62 stated to surveyor that the shower room on C-wing was dirty and smells like mildew. Resident #62's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 03/10/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Surveyor observed the shower room on C-wing on 04/25/23 at 1:35 pm. Surveyor noted a strong odor of urine in the shower room at this time. Surveyor observed the shower room on C-wing on 04/26/23 at 8:30 am. Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 26 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: For resident #376, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan to address pressure ulcer risk and wound care. Resident #376 diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congested heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cellulitis of the left lower limb, atrial fibrillation, pneumonia and malnutrition. The admission Minimum Date Set Assessment (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/12/23 assigned the resident a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15 indicating that resident #376 was cognitively intact. Resident #376 was coded in section G of the MDS as requiring extensive assistance of one or two people with bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. In section H of the MDS, resident #376 was coded as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for physician notifications and documentation of medications and/or treatments for 2 of 26 residents, Resident #99, and Resident #376. The findings included: 1. For Resident #99 the facility staff failed to notify the physician and document medication refusals in the clinical record. Resident #99's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to type II diabetes mellitus. The most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 03/01/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive status. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #99's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for the resident has Diabetes Mellitus. Interventions for this care plan included Diabetes medication as ordered by doctor. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Resident #99's clinical record was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-26 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 of 4 residents in the closed record sample. The findings include: For resident #325, the facility staff failed to involve the resident representative in the development of the discharge plan and inform the resident representative of the final plan to transfer the resident to another facility. Resident #325's diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified dementia, insomnia, anxiety disorder, macular degeneration, hypertension and muscle weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/24/23 assigned resident #325 a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed that resident had no signs or symptoms of delirium and no behavior symptoms during the assessment review period. Resident #325 was documented as requiring supervision to limited assistance with mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-26 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility document review and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to complete a discharge summary for one of 4 residents in the closed record sample. The findings include: For resident #325 the facility staff failed to complete a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment, a summary of the resident's status, reconciliation of all medications, a post-discharge plan of care developed with the participation of the resident and/or resident representative. Resident #325's diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified dementia, insomnia, anxiety disorder, macular degeneration, hypertension and muscle weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/24/23 assigned resident #325 a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed that resident had no signs or symptoms of delirium and no behavior symptoms during the assessment review period.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with provider orders and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 26 current residents, Resident #88 and #66. The findings were: 1. Facility staff failed to ensure Resident #88 received a medication, Gabapentin, on 3/22/23 and 3/23/23 as scheduled per a provider order. Resident #88's face sheet listed diagnoses included but were not limited to spinal stenosis, chronic pain, scoliosis, low back pain, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and post laminectomy syndrome. The minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/19/23 coded the resident's brief interview for mental status a 15 out of 15 in Section C (cognitive patterns). Resident #88's clinical record included a provider's order for Gabapentin Capsule 100 mg by mouth at bedtime for pain. The medication order started on 12/13/22. Upon meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a registered nurse was working at the facility for two (2) of 30 days reviewed for nursing staffing. The findings include: The facility staff failed to have a registered nurse (RN) working at the facility for the following two days: 4/8/23 and 4/22/23. Review of the facility's posted staffing information forms failed to show a RN working at the facility on the following four (4) days: 4/4/23, 4/8/23, 4/14/23, and 4/22/23. The administrator was able to provide evidence of a RN working on 4/4/23 and 4/14/23. On 4/25/23 at 3:37 p.m., the Administrator reported no RN was working at the facility on 4/8/23 and 4/22/23; the Administrator reported an RN should have been working at the facility on those days. On 4/25/23 at 3:50 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the aforementioned dates did not have a RN coverage; the DON stated it could have been due to a call out. On 4/26/23 at 4:17 p.m., the survey team met with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director Nursing. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medical provider approved medication regimen review (MRR) recommendation was implemented for one (1) of five (5) residents sampled for MRRs. The MRR recommendation had to be requested by the pharmacist a second time prior to it being implemented. The findings include: The facility staff failed to perform and/or implement monitoring for abnormal movements as recommended by a pharmacist, as part of Resident #108's MRR dated 12/10/23. This MRR was signed by a medical provider with the request to add AIMS to nursing tasks. (The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) is used to evaluate/monitor individuals who are receiving medications whose side effect include abnormal body movements.) Resident #108's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/9/23, was signed as completed on 4/17/23. Resident #108 was assessed as sometimes being able to make self understood and as sometimes being able to understand others. Resident #108's Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #78. The findings included: For Resident #78, the facility staff failed to perform a flu test as ordered by the medical provider. Resident #78's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Dementia, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5, Essential Hypertension, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/09/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 5 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident #78's clinical record revealed a nursing progress note dated 4/10/23 at 5:56 pm which read in part This nurse was called to the dining room by CNA [certified nursing assistant] staff while attempting to assist resident in eating [their] dinner. Staff report increased lethargy. VS [vital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain complete and/or accurate clinical record/documentation for three (3) of 26 sampled current residents (Resident #25, Resident #105, and Resident #108). The findings include: 1. Documentation of a resident-to-resident altercation involving Resident #105 was noted to be incomplete and/or accurate. Resident #105's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/16/23, was signed as completed on 1/23/23. Resident #105 was documented as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #8's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as an eight (8) out of 15; this indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #105 was documented as requiring assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #105's clinical documentation included a progress note with an effective date and time of 4/14/23 at 9:49 a.m. This note indicated Resident #105 had allegedly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and document review, the facility staff failed to ensure gloves were worn by a staff member when completing a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) test for one (1) of 26 sampled current residents (Resident #58). The findings include: On 4/25/23 at 9:05 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was observed to perform a FSBS test for Resident #58 without wearing gloves. LPN #2 confirmed they should have been wearing gloves. Resident #58's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/5/23, was dated as completed on 4/7/23. Resident #58 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #58's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 13 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #58 was assessed as requiring assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. Resident #58's diagnoses included diabetes. The following information was found in a facility document titled Point Of Care Devices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to properly store and label medications for 1 of 7 medication carts and dispose of expired medications for 1 of 7 medication carts and 1 of 4 medication rooms. The findings included: For medication cart on C-wing, the facility staff failed to ensure insulin pen was labeled with an opened on date and failed to dispose of an expired bottle of aspirin and an expired bottle of Super B complex. For the medication room on A-wing, the facility staff failed to dispose of expired Afluria Quadrivalent flu vaccine. Surveyor observed the medication cart on C-wing, along with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1, on 10/07/21 at 1:30 pm. Surveyor observed an opened Novolog insulin pen in the top drawer of the cart. The insulin pen was not labeled with an opened on date. Surveyor asked LPN #1 how they knew how long the pen had been in use and when to discard, and LPN #1 stated there was no way to know without a date, and that they would dispose of pen and get a new one. Surveyor also observed a bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurately documented clinical record for 4 of 25 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19, #87, #108, and #74. The findings included: 1. For Resident #19, the facility staff failed to document treatments provided to the resident's buttocks and upper back. Resident #19's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Cerebral Infarction Unspecified, Hemiplegia Unspecified Affecting Left Non-dominant Side, Parkinson's Disease, Acute Combined Systolic (Congestive) and Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Unspecified. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of [DATE] assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15 in section C, Cognitive Patterns. Resident #19's current physician's orders included an active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to protect personal privacy for 1 of 25 residents, Resident #48. The findings included: For Resident #48 the facility staff failed to protect the resident's personal privacy while toileting. Resident #48's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to asthma, arthritis, depression, anxiety, type II diabetes, gout, morbid obesity, and hypertension. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 07/29/21 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section G, functional status, coded the resident as needing extensive assistance of one person in the area of toileting. Surveyor observed Resident #48 from hallway on 10/06/21 at 2:30 pm. Resident was seated on bedside commode. The privacy curtain was not pulled, the door to the resident's room was open. Resident's roommate was lying on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 25 residents in the survey sample, Resident #76 and #74. The findings included: 1. For Resident #76, the facility staff failed to revise the care plan for the use of a hand bell. Resident #76's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Unspecified, Chronic Viral Hepatitis C, and Dysphagia following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/30/21 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status score) of 13 out of 15 in section C, Cognitive Patterns. A review of Resident #76's current comprehensive person-centered care plan on 10/07/21 revealed a focus area stating (Resident #76) uses psychotropic medications r/t (related to) Behavior management, hallucinations - Hears voices telling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents who are unable to carry out ADLs (activities of daily living) receive the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene and grooming for 1 of 25 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19. The findings included: For Resident #19, the facility staff failed to provide assistance with bathing per the resident's preference of twice weekly. Resident #19's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Cerebral Infarction Unspecified, Hemiplegia Unspecified Affecting Left Non-dominant Side, Parkinson's Disease, Acute Combined Systolic (Congestive) and Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Unspecified. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/06/21 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15 in section C, Cognitive Patterns. In section G, Functional Status, Resident #19 was coded as being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 25 residents in the survey sample, Resident #76. The findings included: For Resident #76, the facility staff failed to follow the physician's order for a Modified Barium Swallow, a procedure to assess swallowing. Resident #76's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Unspecified, Chronic Viral Hepatitis C, and Dysphagia following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/30/21 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status score) of 13 out of 15 in section C, Cognitive Patterns. In section K, Swallowing/Nutritional Status, Resident #76 was coded as receiving 51% or more total calories received through parenteral or tube feeding and 501 cc/day or more of average fluid intake per day by IV or tube feeding while a resident of the facility and within the entire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-02-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide adequate training and skill sets for dietary staff to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services of the facility. The findings included: For the facility, the facility staff failed to ensure dietary employees received adequate training and skill sets to safely and effectively carry out meal preparation and other food and nutrition services of the facility. Entered the facility kitchen on 2/25/26 at 11:45 AM to observe the lunch meal tray line. Other staff #3 (OS#3) was observed to be preparing resident trays with visible facial hair. OS#3 was not observed to be wearing a beard net. When asked why a beard net was not utilized, the regional director of dining services (RDDS) requested OS#3 to utilize a beard net and OS#3 place a beard net over his facial hair. On 2/25/26 at 12:00 PM, other staff #4 (OS#4), other staff #5 (OS#5), and other staff #6 (OS#6) entered the facility kitchen to begin their scheduled shift and proceeded to the hand-washing sink. None of the dietary employees wore a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Glenville Health & RehabGlenville, WV 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5Mountain View Care CenterRipley, WV 1 of 5New Martinsville Health & RehabNew Martinsville, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Winchester Health & RehabilitationWinchester, VA 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Laurelhurst Post Acute & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Lynn Care CenterFront Royal, VA 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Tygart Valley Health & RehabilitationBelington, WV 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Blue Ridge Therapy ConnectionStuart, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LANDMARK OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2019
VNB NEW YORK LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 07/01/2019
VIAR, LORI JIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2019
IDELS, SHIMONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2019
LIEBERMAN, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2019
SCHWARTZ, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2019
HVH LANDMARK MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2019

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.6M
Related-party expense24% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 11%Other / private 17%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$369per resident / day
operating cost
$11,205per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$426per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495333. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next