Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 214 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2020-03-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, facility staff failed to ensure 1 one of 25 residents, Resident #88 was free from a significant, medication error, causing harm. The facility implemented a plan of correction for this deficiency and no other issues were identified during the survey. This is cited as past non-compliance. Findings included: Resident #88 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: CVA (cerebrovascular accident) with hemiplegia, Hypertension, Dementia, Psychosis and Accidental Opiate Overdose. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/22/2020. Resident #88 was assessed as cognitively intact with a total cognitive score of 13 out of 15. On 03/03/2020 at 2:00 p.m, Resident #88 was observed sitting in a Broda chair watching television, in the day area with other residents. She was alert, but non-verbal. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2019-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, facility staff failed to ensure one of 25 residents in the survey sample was free of an accident with injury, Resident #84. Facility staff failed to ensure Resident #84 did not sustain first and second degree burns on her thighs from spilled coffee on 07/05/2018. Findings included: Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: Heart Disease, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension, Diverticulitis, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer, Neuropathy, and Dementia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/12/2018. Resident #84 was assessed as severely impaired in her cognitive status with a total cognitive score of three out of 15. Resident #84's clinical record was reviewed on 01/23/19 at 10:00 a.m. During this review a clinical note dated 07/05/18 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment in one of two dining rooms within the facility. The findings included:The facility staff failed to ensure a clean environment on the first-floor dining room area.On 4/20/26 at 12:00 pm an observation was conducted in the dining room area on the first floor of the facility. During the observation, there was a light fixture with a bug light underneath, and it was observed that there were cobwebs all over the bottom of the light fixture and top of the bug light. Also, observed were dead bugs on the top and sides of the bug light. There was a resident observed at a table right under the bug light.An interview was conducted with a certified nursing assistant, CNA#1 (CNA1). CNA1 showed the light fixture and bug light, and she said, that looks like it has been there for a while. CNA1 was observed making a disappointed facial expression. CNA1 looked on top of the bug light and said, yeah, it's full of bugs.On 4/21/26 at 2:06 pm an interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility document review, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for six of fifteen residents in the survey sample (Residents #106, #109, #111, #113, #114 and #115). The findings include:1. Resident #109's plan of care was not revised regarding Covid-19 infection and discontinued use of enhanced droplet precautions. Resident #109 (R109) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, insomnia, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R109 as cognitively intact. Review of R109's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 2/26/26 for enhanced droplet precautions for seven days due to the resident testing positive for Covid-19. The clinical record documented the order for enhanced droplet precautions was discontinued on 3/5/26. Resident #109's current plan of care (revised 3/2/26) documented the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that meals were served at palatable temperatures for one of two kitchenettes within the facility. The findings included:The facility staff served residents on the first-floor nursing units (two units) lunch meals at temperatures that were not palatable.On 4/20/26 at 11:45 pm, an observation was made of the kitchenette on the first floor preparing to plate and serve the lunch meal to the residents.The dietary aide, other staff #7 (OS7) was observed obtaining the temperatures of the food from the steam table and the temperatures were as follows:Ham - 100 Puree ham- 90 Sweet potatoes- 110 Grilled chicken- 95 Noodles- 100 Chopped ham - 100 Puree broccoli- 95 Pork chops- 95 Broccoli- 100 Puree bread- 100OS7 was observed shaking her head while obtaining temperatures. OS7 said, it is not reaching the right temperature. OS7 continued to plate the food and was served to the residents on the first-floor of the facility with unsafe temperatures.On 4/20/26 at 2:42 pm, the dietary manager was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure food items in the walk-in freezer were within expiration dates in the main kitchen. The findings included:The facility staff failed to remove expired yogurt stored in the walk-in freezer.On 4/20/26 at 2:30 pm, an observation of the kitchen was conducted. During the observation, the dietary manager was present. In the walk-in freezer, a case of Dannon yogurt labeled with an expiration date of 4/17/26 was observed stored for use after its expiration date. On 4/20/26 at 2:32 pm, an interview was conducted with the dietary manager. During the interview, the dietary manager picked up the case, reviewed the date, and said, yes, it is expired, then shook his head and stated he does not know how the case was missed. He then reviewed the date on the case beside Dannon yogurt.On 4/21/26 a review of facility policy was conducted. The policy titled, Food storage and labeling, read in part, .All food shall be stored, labeled, and dated to prevent contamination and ensure freshness.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, and clinical record reviews, the facility staff failed to implement measures to promote healing to pressure ulcers for one resident, Resident #111 (R111) out of a survey sample of 15 residents. The findings included:The heels up and heel protectors (pressure relieving devices) were not available in R111's room to be offered/used for use to promote wound healing.On 4/21/26 at 10:40 am, an observation was conducted of R111's room. There were no heels up or heel protectors visible in the room or on the bed at the time of observation.On 4/21/26 at 10:47 am, an interview was conducted with a certified nursing assistant, CNA#2 (CNA2). During the interview, CNA2 stated this was the first time taking care of R111. She stated that there were no heels up on his bed or heel protectors on his heels this morning upon her arrival to take care of him today.On 4/21/26 at 10:50 am, an interview was conducted with a licensed practical nurse, LPN#3 (LPN3). LPN3 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices for one resident, Resident #111 (R111) out of a survey sample of 15 residents. The findings included:Facility staff failed to ensure R111's nasal cannula tubing and CPAP (continue positive airway pressure) mask were stored appropriately to prevent infection and maintained infection control practices.On 4/20/26 at 2:45 pm, an observation was conducted in R111's room of his nasal cannula tubing and CPAP mask lying on the floor in his room.On 4/20/26 at 2:50 pm, an interview was conducted with the unit manager, registered nurse, RN#2 (RN2). During the interview, RN2 said, I will get another nasal cannula tubing for him, and it should be stored in a bag when not in use.On 4/21/26 at 10:30 am, a second observation was made of R11's room and the nasal cannula tubing and CPAP mask were on the floor. On 4/21/26 at 10:47 am, an interview was conducted with certified nursing assistant, CNA#2, (CNA2). During the interview, CNA2 stated that this was the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide timely toileting assistance for one of eleven residents in the survey sample (Resident #10). The findings include: Resident #10's request for toileting assistance was delayed until after meal trays were delivered to other residents on the living unit. Resident #10 (R10) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, heart failure, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS - assessment tool) dated 2/28/24 assessed R10 as cognitively intact and as dependent upon staff assistance for toileting and transfers. R10's closed clinical record documented a nursing note dated 3/12/24 stating, .18:00 [6:00 p.m.] resident turned call light, CNA's [certified nurses' aides] were passing trays. Residents CNA checked to see what was needed resident needed to go to the bathroom. CNA told her [R10] she would be able to after dinner (per facility policy) .Resident has done this several times knowing what the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to use a meal ticket that accurately reflected food allergies for one of eleven residents in the survey sample (Resident #3). The findings include: Resident #3 (R3) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hypothyroidism, anemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, venous insufficiency, depression and neuropathy. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R3 as cognitively intact. R3's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 7/27/23 for a regular high protein diet. The clinical record documented R3's food allergies of aspartame and food preservatives. On 6/25/24 at 8:12 a.m., R3 was observed eating breakfast. With the resident's permission, the breakfast meal ticket was reviewed. R3's meal ticket matched the food items served but documented no mention of the resident's allergy and/or intolerance of aspartame and food preservatives. R3 was interviewed at this time about…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accommodate food allergies for one of eleven residents in the survey sample (Resident #10). The findings include: Resident #10 (R10) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, heart failure, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS- assessment tool) dated 2/28/24 assessed R10 as cognitively intact. R10's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 2/21/24 for a regular textured diet with food allergies listed as broccoli, cauliflower, carrots, yellow dye, and lemonade. R10's diet was changed on 2/22/24 to a 2-gram sodium diet and then on 2/23/24 to a 2-gram sodium dysphagia diet, advanced texture. Facility menus for February 2024 included at least four meals served with mixed vegetables that included broccoli, cauliflower, and/or carrots. On 6/24/24 at 2:25 p.m., the dietary manager (other staff #5) was interviewed about accommodation of food allergies for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-06-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program. The facility's documented program regarding protocols and monitoring of antibiotic use was not implemented. The census in the facility was 111 residents. Findings were: On 06/01/2022 at approximately 1:55 p.m., the interim DON (director of nursing), who also identified herself as the IP (Infection preventionist) was interviewed regarding the antibiotic stewardship program at the facility. She stated, I'm not sure what we have, I will need to look .I've been doing this position less than 24 hours. At approximately 3:00 p.m. she presented a policy and procedure Antibiotic Stewardship Program that contained the following: .The goals of the program include: Ensuring residents .are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic, reducing the risk of adverse events, including the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. The Antibiotic Stewardship team will analyze infection data [including type of infection or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,740 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,740 — penalty dated 2026-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA