No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lynn Care Center

1000 Shenandoah Avenue, Front Royal, VA 22630 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (540) 636-0300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$38,110 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $38,110 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-12)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
315 W 10th St · (540) 635-0800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
351 Valley Health Way Ste 210 · (540) 635-0736 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
511 E 6th St · (540) 683-9872 · Call to confirm hours
Park
410 W 12th St · (540) 635-1021 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1111 N Shenandoah Ave · (540) 551-3120

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.8%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms21.0%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.4%20.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.4%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.8%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.9%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.5%22.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.911.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.151.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 239 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.8%CMS range 49.8–62.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.9–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge73.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting87.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.6–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
56.6%
Total nursing turnover
56.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-12)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2026-01-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by other residents for 11 of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #127, #94, #126, #128, #25, #13, #41, #68, and #58, resulting in the identification of immediate jeopardy; and for Residents #48 and #35. The findings include:1. For Resident #127 (R127), the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #99 on 2/1/25.A review of the facility's final synopsis of events dated 2/6/25 revealed, in part: On Saturday, February 1, 2025, it was alleged that [R99] became agitated, combative and struck [R127] in her left eye on the memory care unit. Throughout the investigation, it was reported by staff that frequently care for both residents, they wander throughout the unit and [R99] can become agitated and combative at times, especially when residents are in her personal space. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care, services, and adequate supervision for resident safety for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #99, resulting in the identification of immediate jeopardy and for Resident #40, resulting in harm. The findings include:1. For Resident #99 (R99), on twelve occasions in 2025, the resident physically assaulted other residents on the memory care unit, despite being known to have had previous aggressive behaviors. The lack of adequate supervision of R99 resulted in injury to two victims, Residents #127 and #128. On 2/1/2025, R99 struck Resident #127 in the left eye resulting in redness to the eye. On 4/18/2025, R99 struck Resident #128 in the face resulting in bruising on the bridge of the nose. On the significant change minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/8/2025, R99 was coded as being severely impaired for making daily decisions with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring during a transfer resulting in a fall and fracture which constitutes harm, for one of 44 residents in the survey sample; Resident #32. This was cited as past non-compliance. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring when transferring Resident #32 from the chair to the bed using a Hoyer (1) (mechanical) lift, resulting in a fall and fracture of the right elbow on 12/15/22. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: osteoporosis. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/26/22, coded the resident as scoring a 08 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2021-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services for the prevention and treatment of a pressure injury for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6. On 12/9/20, a knee immobilizer was placed on Resident #6's right leg in the emergency department due to a fracture. The facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order regarding removal of the immobilizer for assessments/checks of the resident's skin beneath and the area surrounding the immobilizer, failed to conduct weekly body skin assessments or assessments of the skin surrounded by the immobilizer from 12/11/20 until 12/21/20. On 12/21/20, documentation evidenced Resident #6 developed a DTI (deep tissue injury) pressure injury (1) on the right posterior calf. The facility staff failed to conduct any assessments of the residents DTI or provide treatment, to promote healing, with the exception of two dates, (12/21/20 and 1/4/21), until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for four of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #94, #128, #25, and #13.The findings include:1. For Resident #94 (R94), the facility staff failed to revise the resident's care plan after she was abused by Resident #99 (R99).A review of the facility's final synopsis of events dated 2/20/25 revealed, in part: On Saturday, February 15, 2025, it was alleged that [R99] became combative and struck [R94] on the right side of her face on the memory care unit. Throughout the investigation, it was reported by staff that frequently care for both residents, they wander throughout the unit and [R99] can become agitated and combative at times, especially when residents are in her personal space. When interviewing both residents involved, neither resident was able to recall the event.A review of R94's clinical record revealed the following progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prepare store and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens. The findings include:On 01/05/2026 at approximately 11:45 a.m. an observation of the facility's kitchen revealed OSM (other staff member) #6, kitchen aide and OSM #7, kitchen aide, at the tray line placing resident's plated lunch meal on trays. Further observations of OSM #6 revealed she was not wearing a hair net and OSM #7 did not have his mustache covered. On 01/05/2026 at approximately 11:50 a.m. an observation of the inside of the reach-in refrigerator revealed two trays containing 78 cups of pasta salad. Further observation failed to evidence a date to indicate when the salads were prepared. On 01/05/2026 at approximately 11:55 a.m. an observation of the inside of the reach-in dairy refrigerator revealed a container with approximately six ounces of pureed turkey without a date and a container with approximately eight ounces of sliced ham without a date. On 01/05/2026 at approximately 2:25 p.m. an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, facility staff failed to promote resident's dignity for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #45. The finding include:For Resident #45 (R45), facility staff stood next to the bed while providing feeding assistance. R45 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but not limited to swallowing difficulties. On the most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/07/2025, R45 scored 3 (three) out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R45 was severely impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. GG0130 Self-Care coded R45 as requiring moderate assistance for eating. On 01/06/2026 at approximately 9:15 a.m. an observation revealed CNA (certified nursing assistant) #3 standing next to R45's bed assisting him with his breakfast. On 01/06/2026 at approximately 9:38 a.m. an interview was conducted with CNA #3. When asked to describe the position she was in while feeding R45 she stated she was standing and that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #48 and #131.The findings include:1. For Resident #48 (R48), the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment. On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/16/2025, the resident was assessed as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. On 1/5/2026 at 2:13 PM, an observation was made of R48 in bed in their room. An approximately 20-inch floor fan was observed sitting on top of the wooden arms of a chair facing the end of R48's bed. The fan was observed to be on and blowing air towards the resident. Observation of the cage of the fan revealed dust fibers and dried brown/grey substance on the inside of the cage. Additional observations of the fan in use with R48 in bed were made on 1/5/2026 at 4:08 PM and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for timely reporting of an abuse allegation for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #99. The findings include:For Resident #99 (R99), the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for reporting of an abuse allegation to the state agency within two hours for resident-to-resident altercations that occurred on 10/24/2025 and 11/2/2025. The facility policy Abuse documented in part, .The organization will maintain systems to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or results in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to report an abuse allegation in a timely manner for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #99. The findings include:For Resident #99 (R99), the facility staff failed report of an abuse allegation to the state agency within two hours for resident-to-resident altercations that occurred on 10/24/2025 and 11/2/2025. Change in Condition evaluations for R99 documented in part,- 10/24/2025 21:30 (9:30 PM) Other change in condition: Another Resident states [R99] was going through her drawers and aggressive tour [sic] her when she asked her to stop .- 11/2/2025 20:56 (8:56 PM) Other change in condition: resident to resident altercation . resident hit another resident [Room number of other resident] in the face with a padded sewing box after [Room number of other resident] reached out and gently touched resident, both residents assessed, no injuries noted, all parties notified . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of a discharge for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #119.The findings include:For Resident #119 (R119), the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of discharge on [DATE].The progress notes for R119 documented in part, 11/21/2025 13:46 (1:46 PM) Note Text: Resident discharge to home via family's car. Alert and oriented at time of discharge. No acute distress noted. Left the facility accompanied by family. All belongings taken by resident.Review of the clinical record failed to evidence notification of the long-term care ombudsman of the discharge on [DATE].On 1/12/2026 at 3:24 PM, an interview was conducted with other staff member (OSM) #9, the director of social services who stated that she sent a monthly notification to the ombudsman of residents who were transferred or discharged to the hospital but did not send notifications of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, facility staff failed to obtain a Level I (one) PASARR (preadmission screening and resident review) for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #11 and #38. The findings include:1. For Resident #11 (R11), the facility failed to ensure a PASARR Level I screening was completed prior to admission. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/11/2025, R11 scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. A review of R11's clinical record revealed they were admitted under Medicare. Further review of the clinical record failed to evidence a level 1 PASARR was completed prior to admission on [DATE]. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 1:20 p.m. a request for R11's PASARR was made to ASM (administrative staff member) #3, regional director of clinical services. ASM #3 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services in a sanitary manner for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #8 and #97.The findings include:1. For Resident #8 (R8), the facility staff failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (1) and follow standard precautions (2) when providing tracheostomy (3) care on 1/6/26. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/12/25, R8 was coded as being in a persistent vegetative state. She was also coded as requiring an invasive mechanical ventilator for breathing and requiring tracheostomy care. On 1/6/25 at 1:10 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #13, a respiratory therapist, was observed providing tracheostomy care to R8. OSM #13 put on gloves before he entered R8's room and began the tracheostomy care; he did not put on a gown or mask. He used gloved hands to remove the soiled gauze around the resident's tracheostomy, and he did not remove those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to complete an annual performance evaluations for two of five CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed, CNAs #5 and #6. The findings include:For CNA #5 and CNA #6, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of the required annual performance evaluation in the past 12 months. On 01/09/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., CNA #5's and CNA #6's most recent performance evaluation was requested. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 10:00 a.m., a review of CNA #5's and CNA #6's most recent performance evaluations were conducted by the surveyor. CNA #5's performance evaluation was dated 11/27/2024 and CNA #6's performance evaluation was dated 03/05/2024. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 11:13 a.m. an interview was conducted with OSM #11, human resources, and OSM #7, regional director of human resources, by telephone regarding employee performance reviews. OSM #11 stated that the employee performance evaluations should be completed annually. She further stated that she was trying to get all performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to evidence agreements for contractual services for one of one facility. The findings include:The facility staff failed to maintain agreements for services with the contracted wound care company. On 01/09/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., a request was made for the facility's contracts for hospice, dialysis, mobile X-ray, mobile laboratory, dental, podiatry, ophthalmology/optometry wound care and psych (psychiatric/psychological) service. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 1:00 p.m. a review of the facility contracts failed to reveal agreements for services with the contracted wound care company. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 4:28 p.m. an interview was conducted with ASM # 4, regional director of operations. ASM #4 stated that when services are initiated with an outside company, the facility has the company sign an agreement and it is kept at the facility. He stated that he was unable to locate the contract for wound care. The facility's policy Consultants documented in part, SPECIFIC PROCEDURES /…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control procedures for one of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8.The findings include:For Resident #8 (R8), the facility staff failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (1) and follow standard precautions (2) when providing tracheostomy (3) care on 1/6/26.On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/12/25, R8 was coded as being in a persistent vegetative state. She was also coded as requiring an invasive mechanical ventilator for breathing and requiring tracheostomy care.On 1/6/25 at 1:10 p.m., OSM (other staff member) #13, a respiratory therapist, was observed providing tracheostomy care to R8. OSM #13 put on gloves before he entered R8's room and began the tracheostomy care; he did not put on a gown or mask. He used gloved hands to remove the soiled gauze around the resident's tracheostomy, and he did not remove those gloves or sanitize his hands before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0942 — isolated
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide required training on resident rights for one of five staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #8, a member of the dietary staff. The findings include:For OSM #8, the facility staff failed to provide required resident rights training. On 01/09/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., OSM #8's education records were requested. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 10:00 a.m., a review of OSM #8's education record was conducted by the surveyor. The record failed to evidence the required training regarding resident rights. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 11:13 a.m. an interview was conducted with OSM #11, human resources, and OSM #7, regional director of human resources by telephone regarding OSM (other staff member) #8's annual training for resident rights. OSM #11 stated that OSM #8 was a contract employee and only received abuse training. OSM #7 stated that all contract employees receive an orientation packet from the facility's human resource (HR) department that contains the required trainings, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide required training on QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement)for one of five staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #8, a member of the dietary staff. The findings include:For OSM #8, the facility staff failed to provide required training on QAPI elements. On 01/09/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., OSM #8's education records were requested. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 10:00 a.m., a review of OSM #8's education record was conducted by the surveyor. The record failed to evidence the required training regarding QAPI elements. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 11:13 a.m. an interview was conducted with OSM #11, human resources, and OSM #7, regional director of human resources by telephone regarding OSM (other staff member) #8's, annual training for resident rights. OSM #11 stated that OSM #8 was a contract employee and only received abuse training. OSM #7 stated that all contract employees receive an orientation packet from the facility's human resource (HR) department that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide required infection control training for one of five staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #8, a member of the dietary staff. The findings include:For OSM #8, the facility staff failed to provide required infection control training. On 01/09/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., OSM #8's education records were requested. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 10:00 a.m., a review of OSM #8's education record was conducted by the surveyor. The record failed to evidence the required infection control training. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 11:13 a.m. an interview was conducted with OSM #11, human resources, and OSM #7, regional director of human resources by telephone regarding OSM (other staff member) #8's, annual training for resident rights. OSM #11 stated that OSM #8 was a contract employee and only received abuse training. OSM #7 stated that all contract employees receive an orientation packet from the facility's human resource (HR) department that contains the required trainings, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0946 — isolated
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide required training on compliance and ethics for one of five staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #8, a member of the dietary staff. The findings include:For OSM #8, the facility staff failed to provide required training on compliance and ethics. On 01/09/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., OSM #8's education records were requested. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 10:00 a.m., a review of OSM #8's education record was conducted by the surveyor. The record failed to evidence the required training on compliance and ethics. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 11:13 a.m. an interview was conducted with OSM #11, human resources, and OSM #7, regional director of human resources by telephone regarding OSM (other staff member) #8's, annual training for resident rights. OSM #11 stated that OSM #8 was a contract employee and only received abuse training. OSM #7 stated that all contract employees receive an orientation packet from the facility's human resource (HR) department that contains the required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide required behavioral health training for one of five staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #8, a member of the dietary staff. The findings include:For OSM #8, the facility staff failed to provide required behavioral health training. On 01/09/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., OSM #8's education records were requested. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 10:00 a.m., a review of OSM #8's education record was conducted by the surveyor. The record failed to evidence the required behavioral health training. On 01/12/2026 at approximately 11:13 a.m. an interview was conducted with OSM #11, human resources, and OSM #7, regional director of human resources by telephone regarding OSM (other staff member) #8's, annual training for resident rights. OSM #11 stated that OSM #8 was a contract employee and only received abuse training. OSM #7 stated that all contract employees receive an orientation packet from the facility's human resource (HR) department that contains the required trainings, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for two of six residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #4. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to ensure Pantoprazole (1), Amantadine (2), Diltiazem (3), Docusate (4), Levetiracetam (5), Oxybutynin (6), Vimpat (7), Tizanidine (8) and Propranolol (9) were available for the scheduled administration times. The nurse's note dated 10/22/24 at 3:45 p.m. documented in part, (R1) was admitted from nursing home via stretcher. The physician orders dated 10/22/24 documented: 1. Pantoprazole Sodium Oral Packet 40 MG (milligrams); Give 1 packet [NAME] G-Tube (gastrostomy) one time a day for gastrostomy status. 2. Amantadine HCL (hydrochloride) Oral Solution 50 MG/5ML (milligrams per 5 milliliters); Give 10 ml via G-tube two times a day for epileptic seizures. 3. Diltiazem HCL Oral Tablet 30 MG; Give 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician and/or responsible party when medications were not administered for three of six residents in the survey sample, Residents #1, #3, and #4. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to notify the physican and the responsible party when medications were not available for administration. The physician orders dated 10/22/24 documented: 1. Pantoprazole Sodium Oral Packet 40 MG (milligrams); Give 1 packet [NAME] G-Tube (gastrostomy) one time a day for gastrostomy status. 2. Amantadine HCL (hydrochloride) Oral Solution 50 MG/5ML (milligrams per 5 milliliters); Give 10 ml via G-tube two times a day for epileptic seizures. 3. Diltiazem HCL Oral Tablet 30 MG; Give 1 tablet via G-tube two times a day for HTN (high blood pressure), hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) < (less than) 100 or HR (heart rate) < 60. 4. Docusate Sodium Oral Liquid 50 MG/5ML;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer medications/supplements per the physician order for two of six residents in the survey sample, Residents #3 and #4. The findings include: 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to administer Banatrol (1) and Ferrous Sulfate (2) per the physician orders. The physician order dated 1/18/25, documented, Banatrol plus Oral Packet (banana flakes); Give 1 packet via G - tube (gastrostomy tube) one time a day for diarrhea. The physician order dated 1/4/25, documented, Ferrous Sulfate Oral Solution 300 Mg/5ML (milligrams per five milliliters); Give 5 ml via G-Tube one time a day every other day for anemia. The January 2025 and February 2025 MAR (medication administration record) documented the above orders. On 1/10/25, 1/12/25 and 1/14/25, a 9 was documented in the block for the documentation of administration of the Ferrous Sulfate at 9:00 a.m. A 9 indicates Other/See Progress Notes. On 1/19/25 at 3:00 p.m. the Banatrol was documented with a 9 in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #2 and #3. The findings include: 1. For Resident #2 (R2), the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for when the resident was moved to a secured dementia unit. The nurse's note dated 6/11/24 at 5:14 p.m. documented, Resident moved from room (XXX-x) to room (XXX-x) in the Shenandoah Gardens (secured dementia unit) MD (medical doctor) and RP (responsible party) made aware. Tolerating well. Will continue to monitor. The comprehensive care plan dated, 8/24/22, documented in part, Focus: (R2) is an elopement risk/wanderer r/t (related to) impaired safety awareness. The Interventions documented, Distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book. Frequent rounding while up in wheelchair. Q (every) 15-minute checks times 1 week. Signage placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident # (R1), the facility staff failed to clarify a physician's order for the application of compression wraps. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 4/23/24, the resident scored a 15 out of 15on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. The physician order dated, 7/5/23, documented, Bilateral lower legs - wrap with compression wrap once a week for 6 months one time a every Mon (Monday) for edema for 6 months. The nurse's note dated, 7/5/23 at 11:06 a.m. documented, Resident had appointment (Name) Foot and Ankle Center, came back with a new order for edema. Bilateral lower legs - Wrap with compression wrap once a week for 6 months. Resident and Family (son in law) made aware. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement for three of four residents in the survey sample, Residents #2, #3, and #4. The findings include: 1. For Resident #2 (R2), the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent the resident was getting out the doors and falling on the pavement outside the building on 5/27/24. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/28/24, the resident scored a three out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. In Section J - Health Conditions, the resident was coded as having had one fall with minor injuries since the last assessment. The resident's mode of mobility was coded as using a wheelchair. The MDS assessment, prior to the elopement, a quarterly assessment, with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner in one of one kitchens. The findings include: Observation was made of the kitchen on 1/3/2023 at 6:19 p.m. A ice cream freezer was located just inside the kitchen. Inside the freezer was a fast-food large plastic cup with a straw, with ice in it. An interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #14, the cook, on 1/3/2023 at approximately 6:24 p.m. When asked if the fast-food cup in the freezer was resident related, OSM #14 stated, no. Three hard boiled eggs were on the counter. When asked how long the eggs had been out of the refrigerator, OSM #14 stated he believed an hour. Observation was made of a sink, with no tap for water and had a covering over it to cover the drain. Inside this sink were pieces of plastic, small pieces of uncooked spaghetti noodles, plastic closures from bread bags and crumbs. The food sink was observed with stagnant water in the bottom, when asked about the sink, OSM #14 stated the disposal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of a change in condition for one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #18 (R18). The findings include: For R18, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of a change in condition requiring a facility initiated transfer to the emergency room on [DATE]. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a five-day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/18/2022, the resident scored a six out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. The progress notes for R18 documented in part, - 11/3/2022 19:32 (7:32 p.m.) Note Text : Resident is having loss of fluid to mouth when fed. Will continue to encourage oral fluid. on call NP (nurse practitioner) [Name of NP] notified. - 11/3/2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence that all required documentation was provided to the receiving facility upon a hospital transfer for one of 44 residents in the survey sample; Resident #25. The findings include: For Resident #25, the facility staff failed to evidence what documentation, if any, was sent to the hospital when the resident was transferred on 10/8/22. A review of the clinical record revealed the following: Nurse's note dated 10/8/22 had documented, called hospital to get an update patient has a fracture and is being admitted . Nurse's note dated 10/9/22 had documented, patient found on floor @7:20pm (at 7:20 PM), vital signs taken assessed, MD (medical doctor) and [family member] SENT TO HOSPITAL. There were no notes indicating what, if any, of the required documentation was provided to the hospital. A review of the facility's transfer packet was conducted. This packet consisted of a manila envelope with a Check List for E.R. (Emergency Room) Transfer form attached to the front for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence that a written notice of a hospital transfer was provided to the resident's representative upon a hospital transfer for one of 44 residents in the survey sample; Resident #25. The findings include: For Resident #25, the facility staff failed to evidence that written notification of a hospital transfer was provided to the resident's representative when the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/20/22 coded the resident as being severely cognitively impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. A review of the clinical record revealed the following: A nurse's note dated 10/9/22 that documented, patient found on floor @7:20pm (at 7:20 PM), vital signs taken assessed, MD (medical doctor) and [family member] SENT TO HOSPITAL. A physician progress note dated 10/18/22 that documented,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 44 residents in the survey sample; Resident #25. The findings include: For Resident #25 the facility staff failed to complete a significant change MDS after a hip fracture that resulted in significant decline in functioning. Resident #25 was most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following a fall with a fracture that resulted in hospitalization. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) a quarterly assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/20/22 coded the resident as being severely cognitively impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. The resident was coded as not ambulating; as having lower limb limitations; as requiring the use of a wheelchair; as requiring extensive assistance for mobility, transfers, toileting; limited assistance for dressing, hygiene, and bathing;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately code the MDS (minimum data set) for two of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents #15 (R15) and #79 (R79). The findings include: 1. For (R15), the facility staff failed to code the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) for the use of oxygen. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: respiratory failure (1). On the most recent MDS, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/19/2022, the (R15) scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs failed to code (R15) for Oxygen Therapy. On 01/04/2023 at approximately 8:44 a.m., (R15) was observed sitting in their room in a wheelchair receiving oxygen by nasal cannula. Observation of the flow meter on the oxygen concentrator revealed a flow rate between four and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record, the facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan for two of 44 residents in the survey sample, Residents #337 and #237. The findings include: 1. For Resident #337 (R337), the facility staff failed to include the resident's non-weightbearing status on the baseline care plan. R337 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of bilateral foot infections and bilateral toe amputations. R337 did not have a complete MDS (minimum data set) at the time of the survey. A review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits, and required assistance with activities of daily living. On 1/4/23 at 8:18 a.m., R337 was sitting up on the side of the bed. Both feet were wrapped completely in white gauze bandages. R337 stated they had been admitted to the facility after having surgery to amputate toes on both feet because of an infection in the bones of both feet. The resident stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the care plan for two of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #32 and Resident #15. The findings include: 1. For Resident #32, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for two-person transfer. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: osteoporosis. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/26/22, coded the resident as scoring a 08 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section G-functional status coded the resident as requiring extensive assistance of two persons for transfers. A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 2/15/22 revealed, FOCUS: The resident has a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #18 (R18). The findings include: For R18, the facility staff failed to review and revised the comprehensive care plan after a pressure injury developed on the right heel. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a five-day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/18/2022, the resident scored a six out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident was severely impaired for making daily decisions. Section M documented R18 at risk of developing pressure injuries and not having any pressure injuries at the time of the assessment. Review of the facility wounds at the time of the survey documented R18 having a Stage 1 pressure injury (1) to the right heel identified on 12/7/2022. The comprehensive care plan for R18 dated 4/27/2022 documented in part, [R18] has a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for a newly-admitted resident's method of transfer from bed to chair for one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #337. The findings include: For Resident #337 (R337), a new admission, the facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for the resident's non-weightbearing status. R337 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of bilateral foot infections and bilateral toe amputations. R337 did not have a complete MDS (minimum data set) at the time of the survey. A review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits, and required assistance with activities of daily living. On 1/4/23 at 8:18 a.m., R337 was sitting up on the side of the bed. Both feet were wrapped completely in white gauze bandages. R337 stated they had been admitted to the facility after having surgery to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide toenail care to one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #17. The findings include: For Resident #17, the facility failed to provide toenail care which resulted in thick, curved, overgrown toenails. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12-22-22, Resident #17 (R17) was coded as being severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions, having scored five out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status). R17 was coded as being dependent on staff for bathing and personal hygiene. On 1/4/23 at 8:12 a.m., R17 was sitting up in bed with eyes closed. R17's feet were visible at the end of the bed. Toenails on both feet were yellow, with both great toenails thick, longer than the end of the toe, and cracked. The skin around the great toenails was dry and scaly. The right great toenail was long and curved over the top of the resident's toe. The toenails on the other toes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #15 (R15). The findings include: For (R15), the facility staff failed to maintain (R15's) oxygen flow rate at four liters per minute according to the physician's orders. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: respiratory failure (1). On 01/04/2023 at approximately 8:44 a.m., (R15) was observed sitting in their room in a wheelchair receiving oxygen by nasal cannula. Observation of the flow meter on the oxygen concentrator revealed a flow rate between four and four-and-a-half liters per minute. On 01/04/2023 at approximately 10:19 a.m., (R15) was observed sitting in their room in a wheelchair receiving oxygen by nasal cannula. Observation of the flow meter on the oxygen concentrator revealed a flow rate between four and four-and-a-half liters per minute. On 01/04/2023 approximately 2:45 p.m., (R15)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services for a complete dialysis (1) program for one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #237 (R237). The findings include: For (R237) the facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for dialysis care and treatment, and failed to provide a dialysis communication form for (R237's) dialysis visit on 01/02/2023. (R237) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to: end stage renal failure (2). The facility's admission assessment for (R237) dated 12/27/2022 documented that (R237) was oriented to person, place, time and situation. On 01/04/2023 at approximately 10:00 a.m. a review of the physician's order sheet for (R237) failed to evidence an order for dialysis. On 01/04/2023 at approximately 10:05 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3. When asked about a physician's order for (R237's) dialysis LPN #3 checked the physician's orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record, the facility staff failed to assess a resident for the safe use of side rails for one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #337. The findings include: For Resident #337 (R337), the facility staff failed to assess the resident for the safe use of side rails when the resident was admitted . R337 was admitted on [DATE]. R337 did not have a complete MDS (minimum data set) at the time of the survey. A review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits, and required assistance with activities of daily living. On 1/4/23 at 8:18 a.m. and 1/5/23 at 9:35 a.m., R337 was sitting up on the side of the bed. At both observations, quarter side rails were up on both sides at the head of the resident's bed. R337 stated they had been admitted to the facility after having surgery. The resident stated they could not transfer from bed to chair without a mechanical lift, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and employee record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure three of five CNAs (certified nursing assistants) received annual performance reviews, CNA #4, #5, and #6. The findings include: On 01/05/2023 an employee record review was conducted to include the annual performance reviews of five CNAs. This review revealed the following: 1. CNA # 4 hired 12/17/2018, revealed no evidence of performance review between 12/17/2021 and 12/17/2022. 2. CNA # 5 hired 10/22/2018, revealed no evidence of performance review between 10/22/2021 and 10/22/2022. 3. CNA # 6 hired 03/09/2020, revealed no evidence of performance review between 03/09/2021 and 03/09/2022. On 01/05/2023 at approximately 4:40 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, administrator ASM #2, director of nursing, ASM #5, regional nurse consultant and ASM #6, maintenance director, were made aware of the above findings. On 01/06/2023 at approximately 9:57 a.m. an interview was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #1, administrator. When asked for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to prepare and serve food at an appetizing temperature in one of three nursing units, Shenandoah Farms. The findings include: Observation was made of the tray line and food delivery on 1/4/2023 at 11:04 a.m. The temperatures were as followed: Ham slices - 151 degrees Cauliflower - 161 degrees Sweet potatoes - 63 degrees - removed from tray line by staff; new pan 158 degrees. White rice - 165 degrees Chopped ham - 160 degrees Chopped cauliflower - 165 Pureed sweet potatoes - 129 degrees - removed from tray line by staff, new pan 158 degrees. Pureed ham - 167 - degrees Mashed potatoes - 158 - degrees Pureed cauliflower - 179 - degrees Gravy - 167 - degrees Observation was made that the hot pellets were not being used under the plates. The plates did come from a warmer. The cart with the food trays left the kitchen at 1:10 p.m. Observation was made of the staff on Shenandoah unit passing the trays and assisting resident to eat. On 1/4/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0811 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a staff member was a trained feeding assistant prior to allowing staff member (OSM #17) to feed one of 44 residents in the survey sample, Resident #26 (R26). The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 11/21/2022, the resident scored a one out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section G - Functional Status, R26 was coded as requiring supervision with one-person physical assistance for eating. The comprehensive care plan dated, 10/5/2022, documented in part, Focus: (R26) has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit AEB (as exhibited by) need for physical assist with ADL self-performance debility. The Interventions documented in part, Physical assist as needed with ADL self-care. Provide supervision and cuing as needed to promote…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain kitchen equipment in operating condition in one of one kitchens. The three-compartment sink was not functional. The findings include: Observation was made of the kitchen on 1/3/2023 at 6:19 p.m. In the dish room the dishwasher was observed. On the opposite side of the room was the three-compartment sink. There were pans stacked in the middle sink in water. There was no water or chemicals in the two other sinks. An interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #15, the dietary manager, on 1/3/2023 at approximately 6:40 p.m. When asked what is wrong with the three-compartment sink, OSM #15 stated it's clogged up and it doesn't work and the grease trap is not working. A policy on the use and maintenance of the three-compartment sink was requested on 1/4/2023 at 3:31 p.m. from ASM #1. An interview was conducted with ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, on 1/4/2023 at 3:58 p.m. When asked why the three-compartment sink is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and employee record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure CNAs (certified nursing assistants) received required training as part of the annual performance reviews for three of five CNA records reviewed, CNA #4, #5, and #6. The findings include: On 01/05/2023 an employee record review was conducted of the annual retraining transcripts of five CNAs. This review failed to evidence the following required training for the CNAs: 1. CNA # 4, hired 12/17/2018, revealed no evidence of dementia, abuse/neglect, infection control and emergency preparedness training between 12/17/2021 and 12/17/2022. 2. CNA # 5, hired 10/22/2018, revealed no evidence of dementia, abuse/neglect, infection control and emergency preparedness training between 10/22/2021 and 10/22/2022. 3. CNA # 6, hired 03/09/2020, revealed no evidence of dementia, abuse/neglect and infection control training between 03/09/2021 and 03/09/2022. On 01/05/2023 at approximately 4:40 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, administrator ASM #2, director of nursing, ASM #5, regional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined facility that the facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner. In the walk in freezer one nine pound half full box of crab cakes and one half full one pound box of frozen egg patties were observed open to the environment, and in the walk in refrigerator one 40 ounce package of provolone cheese was open to the environment. A mixer and blender on a food preparation table available for use were observed with food debris in the mixer bowl and the blender pitcher. The findings include: On 08/29/2021 at approximately 2:00 p.m., an observation of the facility's kitchen was conducted with OSM [other staff member] # 1, dietary clerk. Observation of the walk-in freezer in the facility's kitchen revealed the following: One - nine pound box of frozen crab cakes approximately half full, open to the environment. One - 11.25 pound box of frozen egg patties approximately half full, sitting on the middle shelf open to the environment available for use. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator in the facility's kitchen revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for two of 28 residents in the survey sample, Residents #6 and #73. The facility staff failed to implement weekly skin assessments per Resident #6's comprehensive care plan, and failed to implement Resident #73's comprehensive care plan for fall mats. The findings include: 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6's diagnoses included but were not limited to a fractured right leg, heart failure and muscle weakness. Resident #6's quarterly minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 5/31/21, coded the resident's cognition as moderately impaired. Review of Resident #6's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 12/9/20 that documented the resident returned from the emergency department on 12/9/20 with a right knee immobilizer due to a right leg fracture. A physician's order dated 12/9/20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #6. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #6's comprehensive care plan when Resident #6 developed a DTI (deep tissue injury) pressure injury (1) on 12/21/20. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6's diagnoses included but were not limited to a fractured right leg, heart failure and muscle weakness. Resident #6's quarterly minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 5/31/21, coded the resident's cognition as moderately impaired. A nurse's note dated 12/21/20 documented, Received new orders from NP (nurse practitioner) to apply 'blue boots' to resident's bilateral feet. Also Nursing noted DTI to distal RLL (right lower leg). Area is being rubbed by resident's brace. Applied mepilex border (a dressing used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and implement a fall intervention for two of 28 residents in the survey sample, Resident #41 and 73. 1. On 7/21/21, staff observed Resident #73 inappropriately touch Resident #41 on the thigh. The facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure Resident #41 was not inappropriately touched again by Resident #73. Within a half hour of the first incident, Resident #73 was observed by staff with his hand inside of Resident #41's shirt. 2. The facility staff failed to implement fall mats per the plan of care for Resident #73 who had a history of falls and who was assessed and as being high risk for falls. The findings include: 1. Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #73's diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, chronic kidney disease and heart failure. Resident #73's annual minimum data set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence of ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for one of 28 resident in the survey sample, Resident #29. The dialysis communication records for Resident #29, from 7/28/21-8/25/21, evidenced a total of three missing communication forms for the dates of: 8/11, 8/16, and 8/27. The findings include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29's diagnoses included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease 'ESRD' (end stage of renal failure-inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes and function in the maintenance of electrolyte balance) (1) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic, non-reversible lung disease) (2), dementia (progressive state of mental decline especially of memory function and judgement and often accompanies by disorientation and loss of ability to plan and organize) (3) and Parkinson's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility documentation it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure expired medications were not available for resident administration on two of six medication carts, (Blue Ridge Terrace Unit medication cart, and Sycamore Terrace Unit medication cart). Observation revealed four Prosource (1) 1.5 milliliter pouches, with an expiration date of 10/24/220 were available for administration on the Blue Ridge Terrace Unit medication cart and a bottle of polyethylene glycol (2) with an expiration date of 08/24/2021, was available for resident administration on the Sycamore Terrace Unit medication cart. The findings include: On 8/30/21 at 11:00 AM, an observation of the facility's Blue Ridge Terrace Unit medication cart was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #8. This medication cart was located in the red portion of the Blue Ridge Terrace Unit. In the bulk medication drawer, four -Prosource (1) 1.5 milliliter pouches were found with an expiration date of 10/24/220. On 08/30/2021 at approximately 2:30 PM, an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-31 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure expired laboratory medical supplies were not available for resident use in one of two facility medication storage rooms, Blue Ridge Terrace Unit medication storage room. The first floor medical supply cabinet was observed to contain multiple expired laboratory tube supplies that were available for resident use. The findings include: On [DATE] at 11:15 AM, an observation of the facility's Blue Ridge Terrace Unit medication storage room was conducted with LPN[licensed practical nurse] #8. This medication storage room was located in the yellow portion of the Blue Ridge Terrace Unit. Expired laboratory [lab] tubes available for use were observed and included the following: three pink top 6.0 milliliter tubes with expiration date of [DATE], four yellow top 5.0 milliliter tubes with expiration date of [DATE], seven yellow top 5.0 milliliter tubes with expiration date of [DATE] and 13 red top 6.0 milliliter tubes with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-08-31 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to post current nurse staffing information. Nurse staffing information for 8/29/21 was not posted on 8/29/21. Instead, nurse staffing information for 8/27/21 was posted. The findings include: On 8/29/21 at 2:14 p.m., and 4:50 p.m., observation of the nurse staff posting was conducted beside the elevator on the first and second floors. The nurse staffing information was dated 8/27/21 and contained staffing information for that date. On 8/30/21 at 1:31 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA (certified nursing assistant) #2, the person responsible for posting the nurse staffing information. CNA #2 stated she works Monday through Friday and places the weekend nurse staffing information behind the Friday posting on Fridays. CNA #2 stated there was no one designated to post the nurse staffing information on Saturdays and Sundays. On 8/30/21 at 5:43 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the administrator) and ASM #2 (the director of nursing) were made aware of the above concern. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$38,110 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $38,110 — penalty dated 2026-01-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Glenville Health & RehabGlenville, WV 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Highland Ridge Rehab CenterDublin, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5Mountain View Care CenterRipley, WV 1 of 5New Martinsville Health & RehabNew Martinsville, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Winchester Health & RehabilitationWinchester, VA 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Laurelhurst Post Acute & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Tygart Valley Health & RehabilitationBelington, WV 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Blue Ridge Therapy ConnectionStuart, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SHENANDOAH SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2022
IDELS, SHIMONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2022
SHENANDOAH OPERATORS MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2022
LONG, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.2M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 14%Other / private 11%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$397per resident / day
operating cost
$12,065per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$444per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495316. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next