Guggenheimer Health And Rehab Center
1902 Grace Street, Lynchburg, VA 24504 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (434) 947-5100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $76,681 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.2% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.4% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.5% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 3.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.2% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.6% | 20.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.5% | 21.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.3% | 14.2% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.7% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.2% | 22.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.8% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.24 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.78 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 237 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.8%CMS range 53.5–64.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.8–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.7–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 119.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide interventions for the prevention and/or treatment of pressure ulcers for two residents (Resident #15- R15 and Resident #24-R24) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The facility staff also failed to identify a pressure ulcer until at an advanced stage (stage III) for one resident- R15, which was harm. The findings included: 1a. For R15, who was total care, the facility staff failed to identify a pressure wound until it was at an advanced stage of III, with full thickness tissue loss. On 9/30/24 at 10:30 a.m., R15 was interviewed in their room. R15 was not verbally responsive with the surveyor and did not respond when spoken to. On 9/30/24 and 10/1/24, a clinical record review was conducted. According to the most recent Braden scale for predicting pressure score risk, dated 7/25/24, R15 scored 11 out of 23, which indicated high risk for development of pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide effective pest control on two of three nursing units (unit 2 and unit 3).The findings include:On 1/6/26 at 3:45 p.m., Resident #6 was interviewed about any concerns with pests in the facility. Resident #6 stated that he had recently seen mice in his room at night. Resident #6 stated bait boxes had been placed in the facility and in his room but that only a few mice were caught in the boxes and that the traps had not eliminated the mice. Resident #6 stated he had reported the issue to maintenance and that other residents on the unit reported seeing mice at times, especially at night. Resident #6 stated he had no mice droppings in his room, that housekeeping kept the facility/rooms very clean but that he continued to see mice at night. Resident #6 stated mice had been an ongoing problem for months in the facility.On 1/7/26 at 8:35 a.m., the licensed practical nurse unit 3 manager (LPN #1) was interviewed about any concerns with pests. LPN #1 stated she had not seen any signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide written notice of a room change for one of eleven residents in the survey sample (Resident #3).The findings include: Resident #3 (R3) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, non-traumatic brain dysfunction, dementia with agitation/behaviors, diabetes, anxiety and history of stroke. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R3 with severely impaired cognitive skills. R3's closed clinical record listed a room change on 10/2/24. The clinical record documented no written notice to the resident's representative prior to the room change, including reason for the room change. Nursing notes made no mention of the room change or of any situation surrounding or leading to the room change.On 1/7/26 at 9:50 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) was interviewed about any written documentation/notice to the resident's representative regarding the room change on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review and review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Property the facility staff failed to provide tracking of the resident's personal property for one of eleven residents in the survey sample (Resident #4). This failure contributed to the loss or theft of several articles of clothing belonging to the resident. The findings include:Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed resident #4 (R4) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that include but was not limited to muscle weakness, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, and quadriplegia, urinary incontinence, Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complication, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 3 pressure-induced deep tissue damage of other site, irritant contact dermatitis, Bacteriuria, gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, constipation, insomnia, lactose intolerance, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, unsteady on feet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2a. For Resident #111 (R111), the facility staff failed to follow a physician's order regarding notification of the medical provider when the resident's blood sugar was below 70 and above 400. On 12/9/24, in the afternoon, a clinical record review was conducted of R111's chart. This review revealed that R111 had a physician order with the Humalog sliding scale insulin order that indicated to notify the MD [medical doctor] if the blood sugar was 70 or below, or greater than 400. According to the medication administration record, R111 had multiple instances of her blood sugar exceeding 400 and there was no indication that the doctor was made aware. On 12/1/24, at 4:30 p.m., the blood glucose level was 445. On 12/3/24, the resident's blood sugar readings were 459, 525, 408. On 12/6/24, the blood sugar was recorded as having been 500 and 435. On 12/7/24, the resident's blood sugar at 7:30 a.m., was 409, and on 12/9/24 the blood glucose was 410 and 428. Within the clinical record was no evidence of the doctor being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to properly store insulin on three out of five medication carts inspected. The findings include: A second-floor medication cart had an unopened insulin pen stored at room temperature and a vial of insulin stored with no date opened indicated on the label. Two medication carts on the third-floor unit had opened insulin pens stored beyond the 28-day limit and unopened insulin pens stored at room temperature. On 12/9/24 at 3:42 p.m., accompanied by licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1, two medication carts on the third-floor unit were inspected. Stored in the cart for rooms 300 to 311 were three Fiasp Flextouch insulin pens for a current resident. The pens had not been opened and had a pharmacy label stating to refrigerate until opened. Also on this cart was a Lyumjev Kwikpen insulin labeled as opened on 10/28/24. The pharmacy label on this pen documented to store at room temperature for 28 days after opening. The medication cart for rooms 312 to 320 had a Humalog Kwikpen insulin for a current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to knock on the door of resident rooms prior to entering on one unit of three units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to knock on approximately six room doors prior to entering the room on unit one. On 12/9/24 at 12:15 p.m. an observation was conducted on unit one. During the observation CNA#3 (CNA3) (certified nursing assistant) was observed serving lunch trays to the residents and did not knock on the doors prior to entering the residents' rooms. On 12/9/24 at 12:25 p.m. an interview was conducted with CNA3. CNA3 said, I knock on all the doors that are closed only. CNA3 stated she knew she was supposed to knock prior to entering and that the director of nursing had reeducated her on this. On 12/9/24 at 12:35 p.m., continued observations were made on unit one and CNA3 continued to enter multiple resident's rooms without knocking on the door prior to entering the rooms. On 12/10/24 a review of facility documentation was conducted. The facility document titled, Resident Rights, read in part, .the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for two resident's, Resident #103 (R103) and Resident #107 (R107), in a survey sample of 21 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to review and revise R103's care plan when orders were discontinued. On 12/10/24, observations of R103 revealed no oxygen was in use. On 12/10/24 a review of the clinical record was conducted. The care plan was reviewed for R103. The most recent care plan read in part, .altered respiratory status - oxygen settings O2 via by nasal cannula per order. R103 had no active order for oxygen in his clinical record. R103 had a discontinued order for oxygen on November 13, 2024. On 12/10/24 at 9:20 a.m. an interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON). The DON said that clinical meetings were held daily, that she runs an order summary report, and the clinical staff reviews the report, and updates are made to the care plans in the clinical meeting daily. The DON stated, an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care regarding medication administration for one resident, Resident #115 (R115) out of a survey of 21 residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that medication was not left at bedside, in the resident's room after medication administration. On 12/9/24 at 12:00 p.m., a tour of the nursing facility's unit one was conducted. During the tour of the unit, the surveyor observed a medication cup sitting on the bedside table with the resident's name and room number written on the cup with a black marker. On 12/9/24 at 12:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with the charge nurse on unit one, licensed practical nurse, LPN#5. LPN#5 stated, it is medication in the cup. I am not sure what kind of cream it is. LPN#5 removed the medication cup filled with cream from the bedside and apologized to R115 for it being left in his room at bedside. On 12/9/24 at 12:20 p.m., an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to one resident (Resident #102- R102) in a survey sample of 21 residents. The findings included: For R102, the facility staff failed to provide routine showers. On 12/9/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R102's chart. This review revealed that from 11/20/24-12/9/24, R102 had only received one shower. According to R102's most recent minimum data set (an assessment) with an assessment reference date of 11/13/24, R102 was dependent on facility staff for bathing and showering. On 12/10/24 at 9:19 a.m., an interview was conducted with R102. The resident was asked about showers and said, I get them once a month, they act like they don't know what day I'm to get them. When asked if she wants them more often, R102 said, Yes, my head itches and it drives me crazy. On 12/10/24 at 9:23 a.m., an interview was conducted with a certified nursing assistant (CNA #2). CNA #2 reported that showers are given twice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a physician ordered therapeutic diet for one resident (Resident #108-R108) in a survey sample of 21 residents. The findings included: For R108, who was on a pureed diet, the facility staff failed to provide a diet with a pureed texture. On 12/9/24 at approximately 11 a.m., R108 was visited in her room. R108 was asleep. In R108's room was a sign that read, Level 1 puree with NECTAR thick liquids. Compensatory Swallow Strategies: . Ensure the puree item is smooth & no pieces. On 12/9/24 at approximately 1 p.m., R108's lunch tray was observed, the food was noted to have what appeared to be ground chunks. The two CNA's passing the meal trays on the second floor were asked about the consistency of the food and reported that this was what the pureed foods usually look like. On 12/9/24 at approximately 1:10 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) was asked to view the document/sign posted in R108's room and then observe the meal tray. The DON confirmed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide oxygen at the physician ordered rate for two residents, Resident #115 (R115) and Resident #117 (R117) out of a survey of 21 residents and failed to store the respiratory equipment to prevent contamination for one resident, R115 out of a survey of 21 residents. The findings included: 1. For R115, the facility staff failed to ensure that the oxygen orders by the physician were being followed and failed to store respiratory equipment in a bag when not in use to prevent contamination. On 12/9/24 at 12:00 p.m., a tour of the nursing facility's unit one was conducted. During the tour of the unit, the surveyor observed a CPAP (continue positive airway pressure) mask laying in a bed bath basin on the bedside table. R115 oxygen concentrator setting was set on 1.5 liters per minute via nasal cannula. On 12/9/24 at 12:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with the charge nurse on unit one, licensed practical nurse, LPN#5. LPN#5 stated, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. For resident #111 (R111), the hydrocortisone tablet was not available for administration as ordered by the doctor. On 12/9/24, a clinical record review was conducted. According to the physician order dated 8/21/24, that remained an active order. The order read, Hydrocortisone Tablet 10 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for adrenal insufficiency. According to the nursing progress notes, R111 was not given a dose on 12/3/24 and 12/4/24, because the medication was not available. On 12/3/24 at 10:09 p.m., the administration note read, on order, not in Omnicell, pharm notified pervious shift per nurse [sic]. The nursing note dated 12/4/24 at 12:12 p.m., read, Medication not given, contacted pharmacy and medication will be delivered this evening. NP notified, no new orders. Resident is aware. On 12/10/24 at approximately 9:30 a.m., the director of nursing was interviewed about R111's medication not being available. The DON explained that when medications are not available the staff are to check the Omnicell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0778 — isolatedHelp the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to assist one resident, Resident #121 (R121) out of a survey of 21 residents, with transportation arrangements to an appointment with radiology services. The findings included: The facility staff failed to assist R121 with transportation to a procedure he had been prepped for at the facility. On 12/9/24 at 2:44 p.m., an interview was conducted with facility's scheduler, OS5. OS5 said, there was some confusion about the appointments, but we didn't know about them. The appointment for September 28th we didn't have a time for the pre surgery, so they had to fax us a time, I do remember that. I remember that the transport driver called off and alternate transport was not available but cannot remember all the details and no note in his record about that appointment on 10/1/24. On 12/10/24 at 9:35 a.m., an interview conducted with OS5. OS5 looked up in R121 clinical record on her schedule and verified that R121 had an appointment on 10/1/24, and orders to be NPO (nothing by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow the resident food preference for two residents, Resident #103 (R103) and Resident #106 (R106), in a survey sample of 21 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to follow the meal ticket and R103's food preference. On 12/9/24 at 12:10 p.m., an observation of the lunchtime meal was conducted. R103's lunch tray was served, according to the meal ticket on his tray, he was supposed to receive salad and soup, neither of those items were present. On 12/9/24 at 12:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with R103 about his lunch meal and meal ticket. R103 stated he was supposed to get soup and salad with two meals every day. R103 said, that generally I will get one or the other and sometimes I don't get either one. On 12/9/24 at 12:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse, LPN#5 (LPN5). LPN5 stated that R103 is supposed to have salad and soup on his lunch tray according to the meal ticket. LPN5 stated she would check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one resident (Resident #111- R111) in a survey sample of 21 residents. The findings included: 1a. For R111, who saw a dental provider outside of the facility, the facility staff failed to document that the resident attended the appointment and failed to have any documentation of the visit in the resident's clinical record. On 12/9/24 at approximately 2:30 p.m., R111 was visited in the dining room. R111 was noted to be non-verbal but able to nod yes and no to questions. On 12/9/24, a clinical record review was conducted. There was a physician order with a revision date of 11/12/24, that read, Appointment- November 20, 2024 @ 9am Affordable Dentures & Implants. There was no further documentation within the clinical chart to indicate if R111 went to the appointment or not, or if there were any recommendations. On 12/9/24 at approximately 3:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with a registered nurse (RN #2), who was the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to follow infection control standards on one of three units. The findings included: The facility failed to follow the infection control standards regarding glove use, hand hygiene, and transporting of soiled linen in the hallways. On 12/9/24 at 12:15 p.m., a tour of the nursing facility on unit one was conducted. During the tour of unit one, the surveyor observed a certified nursing assistant, CNA#3 (CNA3) transporting dirty linen in the hallway and holding the linen against her body, with gloves on. CNA3 then removed her gloves and began serving lunch trays without performing hand hygiene. On 12/9/24 at 12:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA3. CNA3 said, I didn't know not to carry dirty linen in the hallways or up against my body. I didn't know not to wear gloves in the hallway, and I just forgot to wash my hands. The director of nursing and the floor nurse educated me on gloves and linen in the hallway and to put dirty linen in trash bags earlier this morning. On 12/10/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for five residents (Resident #78, Resident #70, Resident #83, Resident #15, and Resident #106), in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #78 (R78), who had a hernia and was scheduled for surgical repair, the care plan was not revised to reflect the hernia being present nor pre-operative instructions/care that the facility needed to provide. On 10/1/24 at 8:34 a.m., R78 was interviewed in his room. R78 reported that he had a knot in his lower abdomen/groin and was scheduled to have surgery. On 10/1/24 and 10/2/24, a clinical record review was conducted. There was no documentation within the progress notes with regards to an upcoming surgery. However, in the miscellaneous tab of the clinical record was a document titled, Doctor Order Sheet, which was uploaded into R78's chart on 9/16/24. The document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to provide activity of daily living (ADL) care for three residents (Resident #13 (R13), Resident #43 (R43) and Resident #56 (R56)) of 29 residents in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide showers for one resident (R13). R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R13 included but are not limited to periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, subsequent encounter. R13's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 9/6/24 coded R13 with no cognitive impairment. In addition, the Minimum Data Set coded R13 requiring maximal assistance on staff, for Activities of Daily Living care. On 9/30/24 at 10:00 a.m. a tour of the unit one nursing unit was conducted. R13 was observed in her room and sitting in her wheelchair. Her hair was oily in appearance and lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for seven of twenty-nine residents in the survey sample (Residents #20, #24, #56, #70, #27, #76 and #78). The findings include: 1. Resident #24 did not have weights obtained as ordered by the physician. Resident #24 (R24) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis, chronic pressure ulcers, quadriplegia, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus and neurogenic bladder. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R24 as cognitively intact. R24's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 9/9/24 for daily weights for three days, weekly weight for four weeks then monthly weights. R24's clinical record documented a weight on 9/15/24. There was no other weight documented until 9/30/24. On 10/1/24 at 1:42 p.m., the licensed practical nurse unit manager (LPN #1) was interviewed about R24's weights not obtained as ordered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for three residents (Resident #27-R27, resident #83-R83, and resident #76-R76), in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: 1. For R27 the facility staff delayed treatment of bilateral impacted cerumen as ordered, due to medication not being available. On 9/30/24 at 1:05 p.m., R27 was visited in his room. It was noted that R27 had cotton in his left ear, when asked R27 reported he had wax buildup and was getting drops in his ears. On 9/30/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R27's clinical chart. This review revealed a physician order dated 9/14/24, that read, Debrox Solution 6.5 % (Carbamide Peroxide) Instill 5 drop in both ears two times a day for cerumen impaction for 7 Days. According to the medication administration record (MAR) the medication was not given but once in the 7 days ordered. According…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to properly store insulins on four out of five medication carts inspected. The findings include: Unopened insulins were stored at room temperature on 1st and 3rd floor medication carts. Insulin vials and/or insulin pens were stored on 1st, 2nd and 3rd floor medication carts without labeling of the date opened. An insulin pen on a 3rd floor medication cart was stored and available for use beyond the recommended 28 days after opening. On 10/2/24 at 9:23 a.m., accompanied by licensed practical nurse (LPN #2), a 1st floor medication cart was inspected. Stored in the cart at room temperature were two unopened 10 ml (milliliter) vials of Lispro insulin, an unopened vial of Humalog insulin and an unopened Fiasp flextouch insulin pen. Each of these insulins were labeled for current residents and had a pharmacy label stating refrigeration was required until opened. A Lantus solstar insulin pen for a current resident was also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the main kitchen. The findings included: Multiple open food products were not labeled with an open date and/or use by date and was accessible for distribution. On 9/30/24 at 10:45 a.m. an initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted with the dietary manager (other staff, OS #7). Prior to observation of dry goods area and refrigerators, OS #7 was asked what is the expectation of opened items (dry goods and refrigerated items) in regard to labeling. OS #7 verbalized all opened items should have an open date and used by date when the product is opened. The kitchen tour was then conducted with OS #7. The dry storage room yielded the following open products without opened or use by dates: Bag vanilla wafers, two bags of cake mix, bag of pasta noodles, and bag of corn bread mix. The walk in refrigerator had an opened container of olives with a date of 7/16/24 but no use by date, a partial ham loaf (for sandwiches)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices for one resident (Resident #106- R106). The facility also failed to develop and implement an infection control program and failed to respond to a COVID outbreak in accordance with the guidance from the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), which involved two staff (registered nurse #6 (RN #6) and certified nursing assistant #2 (CNA #2) but had the potential to affect numerous residents on 2 of 2 nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to respond to and implement quarantine and testing measures in accordance with CDC (The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations to manage COVID-19 during an outbreak. On 10/2/24 at 9:32 a.m., an interview was conducted with registered nurse #5, who is the facility's infection preventionist (IP). When asked about their most recent COVID case, the IP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide credible evidence of an antibiotic stewardship program, having the potential to affect residents on 3 of 3 units. The findings included: On 10/1/24 at 8:32 a.m., during an interview with resident #78 (R78), he stated that he had been on an antibiotic but didn't know why. On 10/1/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R78's medical chart. This review revealed that R78 did have an order dated 8/12/24 for Ciprofloxacin HCl Oral Tablet 500 MG that read, give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for uti [urinary tract infection] for 7 Days. According to the medication administration record, R78 received four doses of the antibiotic before the order was discontinued on 8/14/24. According to a urinalysis that was collected on 8/13/24, the results were negative for a urinary tract infection. According to a progress note from the nurse practitioner dated 8/14/24, regarding R78's antibiotic use, it read in part, . being seen today for follow-up of abnormal penile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide education and offer pneumonia immunizations, to 4 of 5 residents (resident #2-R2, Resident #24-R24, Resident #13-R13, and resident #70-R70) sampled for immunizations. The findings included: On 9/30/24, during the initial tour, R2 verbalized to the surveyor that she had been asking daily for administration of vaccines but had yet to be given any. On 10/1/24, five residents, which included R2, were reviewed for compliance with immunization protocols as part of the infection control task. During this review, the clinical record of each resident was reviewed. For R2, R24, R13 and R70, the record documented no evidence the residents had been educated nor offered the pneumonia vaccine, which all of them were eligible for. On 10/02/24 at 9:32 a.m., an interview was conducted with the facility's infection preventionist (IP). During the interview, the IP reviewed and confirmed the above findings with regards to the lack of documentation within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide education and offer COVID immunizations, to 3 of 5 residents (Resident #2-R2, Resident #24-R24, and Resident #13-R13) sampled for immunizations. The findings included: On 9/30/24, during the initial tour, R2 verbalized to the surveyor that she had signed the consent form and had been asking daily for administration of the COVID booster vaccine, but had yet to be given any. On 10/1/24, five residents, which included R2, were reviewed for compliance with immunization protocols as part of the infection control task. During this review, the clinical record of each resident was reviewed. For R2, R24 and R13, documentation revealed that all the residents were eligible for the COVID spike vac, and there was no evidence the residents had been educated nor offered the vaccine. On 10/02/24 at 9:32 a.m., an interview was conducted with the facility's infection preventionist (IP).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have an alternate means for residents to communicate with staff after an extended call bell outage affecting residents on two of three nursing units. The findings included: On 9/30/24 at approximately 10:45 a.m., an initial tour was conducted on each of the three resident care units. It was noted that the call bell system was not functioning at all on the entire second floor. Multiple residents verbalized that the call bells had not been operational for the entire weekend. On the third floor it was noted that the call bell system was not operating in various areas and not affecting the entire unit. On 9/30/24, in the afternoon, various call bells were attempted to be engaged, which included but were not limited to resident #78 and resident #15 and were noted to not function, no visual notification or auditory notification of the call bell being engaged was noted. Certified nursing assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program ensure the facility is free of pests affecting 2 of 3 resident care units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the resident care areas were free of mice. On 9/30/24 and 10/1/24, during resident interviews, multiple residents on the 2nd and 3rd floors complained of an ongoing problem with mice. On 9/30/24 at 10:35 a.m., an interview was conducted with resident #83-R83. R83 said, they have a mouse problem. When asked what is being done R83 said, maintenance sets traps and caught one and I caught one in a Walmart bag. R83 went on to report that he told the staff on Friday he is hearing them in the wall, but maintenance was off the weekend, so he was expecting them to come that day to set some traps. On 9/30/24, in the afternoon resident #78 (R78) and his roommate reported an ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respect for privacy for one of twenty-nine residents in the survey sample (Resident #44). The findings include: Facility staff entered Resident #44's room and private space without knocking or requesting verbal permission to enter. Resident #44 (R44) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and carotid stenosis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R44 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 9/30/24 at 11:11 a.m., R44 was interviewed in his room about quality of life/care in the facility. During this interview, a staff person entered the room without knocking or giving any verbal announcement prior to entering the room. The employee went to R44's roommate, pulled the center curtain and did not acknowledge or address R44 in any manner. R44 stated at this time, This goes on all the time. R44 stated staff members frequently entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice) for 2 residents in a survey sample of 3 residents (Resident #316, Resident #317, Resident # 318) reviewed for Beneficiary Notifications. The findings included: For Resident #317 and Resident #318, the facility staff failed to provide a SNF ABN notice prior to skilled care services ending. As a result of this deficient practice Resident #317 and Resident #318 were not afforded the opportunity to continue skilled care services and have Medicare decide about coverage of such services, known as a demand bill, nor the option for services to continue and the resident be financially responsible. Resident #316 was issued a NOMIC on 4/29/24 but service ended on 4/3/24, so the notice was not given in a timely manner. On 10/1/24 a clinical record was reviewed. The clinical record revealed no evidence of an ABN (Advanced Beneficiary Notice) being issued. The progress notes made no reference with regards to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to uphold the resident's right to privacy with regards to mail and failed to provide timely mail delivery for residents on 3 of 3 units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to deliver mail opened and does not deliver/distribute any mail on Saturdays. On 10/1/2024 at 2:30 p.m. a resident council meeting was conducted with the surveyor and six residents, (R#41, R#43, R#46, R#47, R#56, R#59). Of the six residents, two were from each of the resident units. Residents expressed concerns that mail is opened when they receive it and 4 confirmed, it is particularly with bills. They don't get mail on Saturdays, despite an activity assistant is working every other Saturday. Residents expressed concerns about not receiving packages in a timely manner. R#56 had a package delivered on Monday 9/30/24, that his sister had tracked the package, and he hasn't received it on 10/1/24. R#59 stated that the mail had recently just started being delivered opened to their rooms. The residents stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a homelike environment for two residents (resident #70-R70 and resident #78-R78) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: 1. For R70, whose ceiling was leaking the facility staff failed to make timely repairs to maintain a homelike environment. On 9/30/24 at 11:29 a.m., R70 was visited in her room. R70 was non-verbal but was able to communicate by shaking her head to indicate yes and no. During the interview, R70 pointed to a trashcan that had been placed on top of the air conditioning (ac)/heat unit in the room at the window. The surveyor observed that underneath the trash can was towels that appeared to have been there for an extended period and chips of plaster/sheet rock were on the towel, ac unit, and floor. The trash can had water in it measuring about 1- 1 1/2 inches deep and a black substance was floating on top of the water. When asked about the duration of the leak, R70 indicated it had been like that for months. On 10/1/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to accurately complete a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) to identify if a level II evaluation was warranted for one resident (resident #90-R90) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: For R90, who had multiple diagnosis of mental illness, the facility staff failed to accurately complete a level I PASARR, to determine if a more in-depth, level II assessment was warranted. On 10/1/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R90's chart. This review revealed that R90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnosis which included, but were not limited to post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder- recurrent, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, paranoid schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder, and schizophrenia unspecified. Review of the level I PASARR completed 4/21/23, revealed that question…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one resident (resident #5- R5) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: For R5, who was edentulous, due to broken and ill-fitting dentures, the facility staff failed to address oral status in the comprehensive care plan. On 9/30/24 at 2:57 p.m., R5 was visited in his room. The surveyor noted while talking to the resident that he appeared edentulous. When asked, R5 reported he had dentures, but they broke and said, I bit into something a while back and it put a hole in one of them [referring to dentures]. R5 went on to say that he had gone to a dentist, had dentures made and was supposed to just pick them up but didn't go. He said he guesses he would have to get new ones made again since it has been so long. On 9/30/24-10/1/24, a clinical record review was conducted. This review revealed a progress note from the nurse practitioner dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for three of twenty-nine residents in the survey sample (Residents #53, #68 and #166). The findings include: 1. Resident #166's medication Advair diskus (fluticasone-salmeterol) was left at the bedside after administration of the medication. Resident #166 (R166) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), respiratory failure, diabetes, urinary tract infection, asthma, anemia, and rheumatoid arthritis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R166 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 9/30/24 at 10:42 a.m., R166 was observed in bed. The medication Advair diskus breath activated inhaler device was observed on R166's over-bed table. R166 was interviewed at this time about the Advair. R166 stated the nurse administered the medication last evening (9/29/24) and left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for one resident (Resident#43, R43) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to replace eyeglasses broken by staff timely. On 10/1/24 at 8:00 a.m. R43 was laying in his bed and was trying to read his newspaper. R43 stated, I can see far away but not up close and I have not received my glasses yet. On 10/1/24 at 2:30 p.m. During resident council meeting R43 stated, I have glasses missing that staff broke, they said they were going to replace them but that was 2 months ago. On 10/2/24 at 9:45 a.m. an interview was conducted with the social worker director. The social worker director stated, I sent out an email of high priority to the director of nursing, unit manager, activity director and unit one's social worker. The email read in part, .he[R43] mentioned that about a week ago a staff member (he did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a therapeutic diet for one resident (Resident #56, R56) out of a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide large portion entrees with meals as ordered by the physician. On 9/30/24 at 12:30 p.m. an observation was made of the lunch time meal. R56 meal ticket had large entree portions. He received the regular serving size of the entree on his meal tray. The entree was Italian chicken, and he only received 3 ounces. On 9/30/24 at 12:33 p.m. a certified nursing assistant (CNA#2) was interviewed. CNA#2 stated, sometimes he [R56] gets double portions but today he [R56] did not get double entree, and he doesn't get double the meats. On 9/30/24 at 12:33 p.m. an interview with R56 was conducted. R56 said that the serving size of the food is too small with his meals. On 10/1/24 at 8:45 a.m. an observation was made of R56's breakfast tray. R56 was in his room and the aide was setting up his meal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. For resident #90- R90, the facility staff failed to maintain the nebulizer mask in a manner to prevent contamination to prevent infection. On [DATE] at 11:26 a.m., R90 was observed in his room having a nebulizer treatment being administered via a mask. The mask nor tubing were dated as to when they were last changed. On [DATE] at approximately 4:02 p.m., R90 was visited in his room. The nebulizer mask was observed open to air and not in a bag. On [DATE] at 3:03 p.m., R90 was again visited in the room. It was noted that the nebulizer mask was laying in the floor at the bedside. On [DATE] at 3:16 p.m., an interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse #4 (LPN #4). LPN #4 was asked about nebulizers and the storage of them. LPN #4 stated they are to be stored in a bag and are changed nightly and dated. When asked why this is important, LPN #4 stated to know it is not expired, being kept clean and safe non-bacterial place, and when things are changed last. LPN #4 was told that R90's nebulizer mask was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0778 — isolatedHelp the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to assist one resident, Resident #121 (R121) out of a survey of 21 residents, with transportation arrangements to an appointment with radiology services. The findings included: The facility staff failed to assist R121 with transportation to a procedure he had been prepped for at the facility. On 12/9/24 at 2:44 p.m., an interview was conducted with facility's scheduler, OS5. OS5 said, there was some confusion about the appointments, but we didn't know about them. The appointment for September 28th we didn't have a time for the pre surgery, so they had to fax us a time, I do remember that. I remember that the transport driver called off and alternate transport was not available but cannot remember all the details and no note in his record about that appointment on 10/1/24. On 12/10/24 at 9:35 a.m., an interview conducted with OS5. OS5 looked up in R121 clinical record on her schedule and verified that R121 had an appointment on 10/1/24, and orders to be NPO (nothing by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to arrange for routine dental services for one resident (resident #5-R5) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: On 9/30/24 at 2:57 p.m., R5 was visited in his room. The surveyor noted while talking to the resident that he appeared edentulous. When asked, R5 reported he had dentures, but they broke and said, I bit into something a while back and it put a hole in one of them [referring to dentures]. R5 went on to say that he had gone to a dentist, had dentures made and was supposed to just pick them up but didn't go. He said he guesses he would have to get new ones made again since it has been so long. R5 added, I would like someone to come here to look at them versus me having to go all the way there. On 9/30/24-10/1/24, a clinical record review was conducted. This review revealed a progress note from the nurse practitioner dated 5/23/24, that read in part, . Chief Complaint/Nature of Presenting Problem: Broken dentures . seen today for complaints of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow the resident food preference for two residents, Resident #103 (R103) and Resident #106 (R106), in a survey sample of 21 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to follow the meal ticket and R103's food preference. On 12/9/24 at 12:10 p.m., an observation of the lunchtime meal was conducted. R103's lunch tray was served, according to the meal ticket on his tray, he was supposed to receive salad and soup, neither of those items were present. On 12/9/24 at 12:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with R103 about his lunch meal and meal ticket. R103 stated he was supposed to get soup and salad with two meals every day. R103 said, that generally I will get one or the other and sometimes I don't get either one. On 12/9/24 at 12:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse, LPN#5 (LPN5). LPN5 stated that R103 is supposed to have salad and soup on his lunch tray according to the meal ticket. LPN5 stated she would check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 3 residents (Resident #13, R13, Resident #78, R78, and Resident #53, R53) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to accurately document R13's activity of daily living (ADL) care regarding showers. On 9/30/24 at 10:00 a.m. a tour of unit one was conducted. R13 was observed in her room and sitting in her wheelchair. Her hair was oily in appearance and lower extremities had some dry skin noted. On 9/30/24 at 10:45 a.m. an interview was conducted with R13. R13 stated, that the staff has given me one bath since I have been here and the rest of the time, I bathe myself the best I can. I have not had a shower since I have been here and staff is short especially on weekends and my bed has been like it is right now since Friday, unmade. On 10/2/24 at 10:30 a.m. a clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain resident beds in operating condition for one resident (Resident #78-R78) in a survey sample of 29 residents. The findings included: For R78, whose bed was not operational for three days, the facility staff failed to replace the bed to provide the resident with an operational bed, which left the resident to lay in an upright position for several days. On 9/30/24 at 12:14 p.m., R78 was visited in his room and interviewed. R78 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. R78 reported that his bed had been in that position since Friday, and he was uncomfortable. R78 asked if the surveyor could help with this problem. On 9/30/24 in the afternoon, certified nursing assistant #9 confirmed that R78's bed was not working throughout the entire weekend, and they had a problem with several beds. On 9/30/24 at 4:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with registered nurse #6 (RN#6), who was the unit manager. RN#6 was asked about R78's bed. RN#6 said, I just had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for one of 6 residents in the survey sample: Resident # 4. Resident # 4 was ordered to have 3 showers a week, but received bed baths. Findings include: Resident # 4 (R4) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to: other acquired deformity of the head, encephalopahty, dementia, high blood pressure, and congestive heart failure. The discharge MDS (minimum data set) dated 6/10/22 had R4 assessed with severely impaired cognition with a total score of 7/15. R4's clinical record was reviewed 10/10/23 beginning at 10:55 a.m. Review of R4's physician order summary (POS) revealed an order dated 5/27/22 for Pt. to shower M-W-F per MD order. If he refuses, please notify nurse. A preceding order dated 5/16/22 also documented that R4 was to have a shower three times a week. Review of the progress notes did not document any refusals by R4 for a shower. On 10/10/23 at approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). The findings include: Multiple dressing changes/pressure ulcer treatments and an updated physician order were not accurately documented on Resident #1's February 2023 treatment administration record (TAR). Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, mood disturbance, anxiety, lower leg vascular ulcers, pneumonia, COVID-19, deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infection, respiratory failure with hypoxia, congestive heart failure, sacral pressure ulcer, and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 with short and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills. R1's clinical record documented the resident was re-admitted to the facility from a hospitalization on 2/1/23 with an unstageable sacral pressure ulcer. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly for one of 6 residents in the survey sample. Resident #5's (R5) inhaler medication was at the bedside. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R5 included: Respiratory failure, dysphagia, and kidney disease. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/5/23, in which Resident #5 was assessed with moderately cognitive impairment. On 10/10/23 at 10:30 AM, during an initial tour of the facility, R5 was observed laying in bed. During a conversation with R5, it was noted that an inhaler labeled Trelegy 100/62.5 mcg [micrograms] was sitting on the bed side table. When asked about the medication, R5 verbalized uncertainty why the medication was in the room. On 10/10/23 at 10:35 AM, registered nurse (RN1, assigned to R5) was interviewed. When questioned about the presence of the medication, RN1 went to R5's room and retrieved the medication. RN1 verbalized that she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #384 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, including but not limited to: Acute chronic anemia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure and hypercalcemia. Due to her recent admission an MDS (minimum data set) had not been completed. A Nursing admission Assessment Comprehensive dated 10/11/2021 contained the following information under the cognitive section: .Short Term Memory of-seems/appears to recall after 5 minutes .Usually Understood-difficulty finding words or finishing thoughts .Unclear Speech-slurred mumbled words .Usually Understands-may miss some part/intent of message . Her admission nursing not dated 10/12/2021 at 2:56 a.m., described Resident #384 as alert with confusion. Initial tour of the third floor of the facility was conducted on 10/12/2021 beginning at approximately 10:30 a.m. At approximately 11:05 a.m. the door to Resident #384's room was observed closed. A staff member came down the hallway carrying an isolation cart and signs. She stopped at Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to dispose of expired IV (intravenous) antibiotic medication which was available for administration, in one of four medication rooms, Unit 1. Findings include: An observation of the Unit 1 medication room was conducted on 10/12/21 at 11:40 AM, with RN (Registered Nurse) #2. In the medication refrigerator was one bag of IV medication, ertapenem 1 gram/50 ml (milliliters) of normal saline. The medication had a pharmacy label with an expiration date of 09/22/21. RN #2 was asked if this resident was a current resident and RN #2 stated, Yes. RN #2 then stated, That (medication) should have been trashed. RN #2 then stated that the pharmacy doesn't take back this type of medication and that they are to dispose of expired medications. On 10/12/21 at approximately 1:15 PM, a policy was requested on medication storage and expired medications. On 10/13/21 at approximately 12:10 PM, the administrator and corporate consultant were made aware of the above concern and was again asked for a policy on expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, facility staff failed to store and prepare food properly in the main kitchen. Findings included: On 10/12/21 at 10:45 A.M. an initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted along with the dietary manager (other staff, OS #1). A sink was observed, partially filled with cold water, and 4 packages of vacuum sealed beef. There was no running water over the meat. OS #1 stated the meat was supposed to be thawed using running water so that the water is constantly draining off. On 10/13/21 1:25 PM the above information was presented to the administrator, no other information was presented prior to exit conference.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, facility staff failed to prepare, store and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Facility staff failed to obtain initial food temperatures before plating food for resident consumption on the first floor and the cook failed to wear a cover over his beard while preparing and serving food. Two quart-size containers of V8 juice and two pint-size containers of cranberry juice were noted open and not dated in the refrigerator. Findings included: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 01/14/19 at 11:35 a.m. the cook was observed without a beard cover in place. He was observed preparing and serving food in the main kitchen. Also during the tour, the tray line was observed set up. This surveyor asked if initial food temperatures had been obtained. The cook stated, No, I am getting ready to do them here in a minute. A cart with plated food on trays was noted behind the serving line. The Dietary Manager (DM) was asked what those trays were. The DM stated, Those are trays for the first floor. This surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to give advance notice of a care plan meeting for two of 22 residents in the survey sample. Residents #39 and #60 were not given advance notice of their most recent care plan meeting and stated they had not been invited to the meeting. The findings include: 1. Resident #39 was not given advance notice of her last care plan meeting and stated she was not invited to attend and/or participate in the meeting. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #39 included diabetes, atherosclerotic heart disease, depression, gastroesophageal reflux and osteoarthritis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #39 as cognitively intact. On 1/14/19 at 4:10 p.m., Resident #39 was interviewed about quality of life and care in the facility. When asked about her attendance or participation in her care plan conference, Resident #39 stated she did not recall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to discontinue an order for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication for one of 22 residents in the survey sample. Resident #43 had a physician's order for PRN (as needed) Lorazepam for more than 14 days without a stop date reflected. The findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #43 included hyperlipidemia, dementia, anxiety, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, restless/agitation and palliative care/hospice. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #43 as having severe cognitive impairment. Resident #43's clinical record was reviewed on 01/15/19 at 1:30 p.m. Included in this resident's physician order sheet was an order that stated, Lorazepam 0.5 mg (milligrams) (1) TABLET Oral. Notes: Anxiety, Instructions: Take one (1) tablet p.o. (by mouth) every 12 hours as needed for anxiety or agitation., Therapeutic Range: Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-01-16 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide written notification of a hospital transfer for two of 22 residents in the survey sample: Residents # 80 and # 23. 1. The facility staff failed to provide written documentation to Resident # 80 of a transfer to the hospital. 2. The facility staff failed to provide written documentation to Resident # 23 of a transfer to the hospital. Findings include: 1. Resident # 80 did not receive a written notice of his transfer from the facility to the hospital. Resident # 80 was admitted to the facility 7/25/16 with a readmission date of 10/16/18. Diagnoses for Resident # 80 included, but were not limited to: high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, anemia, and pressure ulcers upon admission. The admission MDS (minimum data set) dated 10/20/18 had Resident # 80 assessed as cognitively intact with a total summary score of 15 out of 15. The closed clinical record was reviewed 1/15/19 at approximately 2:00 p.m. Nurses notes documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$76,681 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $76,681 — penalty dated 2024-10-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIAMOND HILL SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2021 |
| TIMBERLAKE OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2021 |
| MARTIN, KRISTI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| IDELS, SHIMON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| HVH TIMBERLAKE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2021 |
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495112. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.