No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mountain View Care Center

107 Miller Drive, Ripley, WV 25271 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (304) 633-4732 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$34,496 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $34,496 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-26)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
122 Pinnell St · (304) 372-3506 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
200 Academy Dr · (304) 372-4487 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
144 Academy Dr · (304) 532-5366 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Straight St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
106 Miller Dr · (304) 373-0090

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.0%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.6%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms56.0%7.6%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.1%15.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.1%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.7%22.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.8%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.7%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.8%11.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.081.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.011.841.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
30.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 30.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.0%CMS range 28.6–48.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.1–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge30.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge13.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.9–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
50.5%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-26)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

67 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing diet in a form prepared to meet their individual needs. This failed practice created an immediate jeopardy sitaution. There was an immediate risk of choking for residents who were supposed to be served mechanical soft diets. This immediate jeopardy situation had the potentail to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Resident identifiers: #86, #42, #36, #48, #19, #57, #53, #16, #60, #75 and #7. Facility census: 106. Findings included: a) During lunch pass, on 02/16/25 at 11:55 AM, Resident #86, #42, #36, and #48 with physician-ordered mechanical soft diets were noted to have whole meatballs and whole penne pasta. These These residents were consuming the meatballs and pasta. On 02/16/25 at 11:55 AM, [NAME] #74 said They (the meatballs) are whole today, but they are cutting them (the meatballs) for them (the residents) now. The residents had plastic utensils due to a broken dishwasher and were observed having difficulty cutting their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for two (2) of 58 resident rooms, and the main dining room, observed during the long-term care survey process. Dining room doors in disrepair. Rooms #209 and #210 were in disrepair. Resident Identifiers: #52, 65, 48 and 28. Facility Census: 109. Findings include: a) Hill Valley Healthcare policy titled Homelike Environment states: Residents will be provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Environment: refers to any environment in the facility that is frequented by residents, including (but not limited to) the residents rooms, bathrooms, hallways, dining areas, lobby, outdoor patios, therapy areas and activity areas. Homelike Environment: is one that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting, to the extent possible, and allows the residents to use those personal belongings that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice affected four (4) residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident Identifiers: #1, #76, #6, and #116. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) Resident #116A policy titled, Social Services-Transportation, read as follows: our facility shall help arrange transportation for residents as needed.According to the hospital discharge orders for Resident #116 from 07/04/26, a follow up was scheduled with the Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) Clinic on 07/14/26 at 1:40 PM and a follow up was recommended with Nephrology, (name of physician) in one to two (1-2) weeks from hospital discharge.A review of the transportation schedule for July 2025 does not show either appointment. The facility was unable to produce evidence that they had provided transportation to scheduled appointments or that the resident attended those appointments.In an interview with Corporate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all food was temped before leaving the kitchen, to ensure safe food temperatures to prevent foodborne illness and an appetizing temperature of the food. The facility failed to ensure hot foods were served hot and cold foods were served cold. This failed practice was true for one (1) of one (1) meal tray tested throughout the survey process. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number residents. Resident identifier: #49, 12, 89, 44 and 65. Facility census: 109 Findings include: a) Policy #ADM-015-Food Temperature Control states: Policy: All foods shall be cooked, held, and served at safe temperatures to prevent foodborne illness. Purpose: To ensure compliance with FDA Food Code and CMS F812 standards Procedure:Hot foods > 135 degrees F; cold foods < 41 degrees F. Food temperatures will be taken once cooked, before, during and after service. Thermometers shall be calibrated daily and sanitized after use. Corrective action will be taken immediately for any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional food safety standards. Additionally, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation practices for the kitchen and the food preparation equipment. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 109Findings include: a) Policy #ADM - 077 - Label and Dating Requirements states: Policy: All prepared, opened, or repackaged foods shall be labeled and dated to ensure proper rotation and safety. Purpose: To prevent spoilage and maintain compliance with sanitation standards. Procedure: Each container must be labeled with product name, preparation or open date, and discard date. b) Policy #ADM - 018 - Equipment Cleaning and Maintenance states: Policy: All dietary equipment shall be maintained in good repair and kept in a clean, sanitary condition at all times. Purpose: To ensure food is prepared and served safely and that equipment operates efficiently in accordance with CMS F812. Procedure: Equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store and dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The lids for the trash cans located in the kitchen and the dish room were not on during two different observations of the kitchen during the survey process. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents at the facility. Facility census: 109. Findings include: a) Policy #ADM -300 - Garbage and Waste Disposal states: Policy: All garbage and food waste shall be handled and disposed of safely and frequently to maintain sanitation and odor control. Purpose: To prevent pest attraction, odor buildup, and contamination in food-service areas. Procedure:Keep the lids closed at all times and when not in use.Clean and sanitize garbage cans daily, including exterior surfaces.b) The Initial walkthrough of the kitchen took place on 06/01/26 at 11:00 AM The Director of Dining Services (DDS) accompanied this surveyor and verified the findings to be true. There was no lid on the trash can located beside the handwashing sink. I asked The DDS if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, family interview and staff interview the facility failed ensure Resident #63 maintained privacy of her medical record. The facility sent excerpts from the residents medical record to an out of state facility without the permission of the healthcare decision maker. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of privacy during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: 63. Facility Census: 109. a) Resident #63 On 06/02/26 at 8:28 am an interview with the Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) for Resident #63 revealed that the facility sent excerpts of the medical record to another facility without the MPOA's permission. She stated, Things are better now but they did do that last year. A review of Resident #63's medical record found the following Social Service Progress note: -- Not Dated 05/07/25 ar 9:23 AM read as follows: (Name of out of state faiclity) contacted social services with an inquire of additional notes. 7 days of notes sent per request. Awaiting response. --Note dated 05/07/25 at 12:08 pm read as follows: SS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they had a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight (8) consecutive hours daily. This failed practice has the potential to effect more than an isolated number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: 109. A review of the facility's hours per patient day (HPPD) found they had 4.33 hours of RN coverage for 03/22/26. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 06/03/26 at 1:30 PM confirmed they did not meet the eight (8) hour requirement on 03/22/26.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident Interview, record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #20's food preferences were identified and honored as required. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #20. Facility Census: 109. a) Resident #20 During an interview on 06/01/26 Resident #20 was asked how the food at the facility was she stated, The food sucks. I am a vegetarian and get meat constantly. I have told them this for years. A review of Resident #20's medical record found a quarterly dietary profile dated 05/15/25. This was the most recent dietary profile in the medical record. This dietary profiled failed to identify the fact the resident does not like to eat meat. The dislikes section was left blank. An observation of the noon time meal on 06/02/26 found the resident was served spaghetti with meat sauce. The nurse aid who was assigned to the resident looked at the tray and said, I told them this morning not to send that because she doesn't eat meat. Observation of the breakfast meal on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were being followed, prepared in advanced and meet the resident's nutritional needs. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 106. Findings included:a) The facility's policy and procedure for Kitchen Weights and Measurements stated, Food Services Staff will be trained in proper use of cooking and serving measurements to maintain proper portion control. The procedures and guidance included staff training in weights and measures, recipes will will specify specific measurement guidelines, serving utensils will be consistent with measurement used and the Food Service Supervisor will ensure cooks prepare the appropriate amount of food for the number of servings required. b) On 10/14/2025 at 11:45 AM, the [NAME] #119 and Acting Dietary Manager #72 were unable to produce a production sheet serving size and scoop size to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure the residents were served food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #86. Facility Census: 106.Findings included:a) On 10/14/2025 at 12:45 PM, Resident was observed to receive her tray that had been left uncovered in the main dining room since12:05 PM. The resident was not seated at the table when her tray was served by staff. The resident came into the dining room at 12:45 PM and began eating her food. Staff did not offer to heat or cut up her food. The resident stated it was cold and difficult to chew, The resident was offered a new, hot plate by the state surveyor and was accepted. Nursing was notified and the temperature of the resident's tray was taken by the Director of Nursing. Temperatures were as follows:Brussel Sprouts - 65 degreesLemon Pudding - 68 degreesRice - 68 degreesChicken - 79 degreesThe facility's policy and procedure for Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 56 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a manner that prevents food borne illness to the residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY.Findings included:a) On 10/12/2025 at 12:59 PM, the facility ran out of chicken and hamburger patties were substituted. [NAME] #73 went to the freezer and removed the hamburger patties and began frying them in a skillet.Cook #119 and [NAME] #73 did not take the temperature of the fried hamburger before placing it on the bun and placing it on the tray to be served to the residents The State Surveyor intervened and asked the cook to take the temperatures of two hamburger patties. The hamburgers patties straight from the stove top were tempt and were 149 degrees and 151 degrees. Food Safety. Gov stated beef should be cooked to 160 degrees and ground meat should be cooked to 165 degrees.b) [NAME] #119 told kitchen staff to put the two trays with the hamburgers that did not reach a safe temperature on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure residents heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) filter was free of debris. This was true for one (1) of six (6) HVAC units observed on the A Hall. Room identifier: 126-2. Facility census: 106.Findings included: On 01/14/25 at 11:30 AM, in the presence of the Maintenance Director (MD), he confirmed that the filters in room [ROOM NUMBER] had gray dust bunnies covering both HVAC filters. When asked who was responsible for cleaning the filters, the MD stated that the Housekeeping Department was responsible for cleaning the filters on a weekly basis.An additional interview with the Director of Housekeeping at 11:40 AM on 10/14/25 confirmed both HVAC filters needed to be cleaned as they were covered in gray dust bunnies. She stated that she would take care of this.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assess and review significant weight loss and failed to obtain weekly weights per recommendation of Registered Dietician and the risk management. The facility failed to assess and provide care to a resident with significant weight loss. This deficient practice was identified for one(1) out of three(3) residents with reported weight losses. Resident identifier #28. Facility census: 106 Findings included; a) Resident #28 This resident was identified to have significant weight loss as documented in the Registered Dietician (RD) notes as follows, 1 month: 08/02/25- 144 pounds(#) (8#, 5.6%), 3 month: 06/02/25 149# (12.6#, 8.5%), 6 month: 3/4 162# (26#, 16%). The RD recommended double portions and check weights every 4 weeks. On 10/15/25 at 12:25 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified that weights were not completed. The DON stated I don't have an answer, weekly weights fall off when stable. Weights were as follows 10/02/25 140.2 pounds(#), 08/02/25 144#, 06/02/25 149#, and 03/04/25 162#. The facility failed to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to prepare food in the form to meet the individual needs of the resident as ordered by the physician. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #71. Facility Census: 106.Findings included:a) Resident #71 was ordered a Mechanical Soft texture diet with nectar thickened liquids. The resident was care planned for a Regular Diet, Mechanical Soft texture and Nectar-like fluids.b) On 10.14.2025, Resident #71 was served a pureed lunch meal. [NAME] #119 reported a resident on a mechanical soft diet would get chopped broccoli. At 11:50 AM, Acting Dietary Manager #72 confirmed the tray was pureed consistency and the tray was sent to the dining room without any changes

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and observation , the facility failed to provide drinks consistent with the resident's needs and diet order. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #39. Facility Census: 106.Findings included:a) Resident #39 had a physician's order for a puree diet and nectar consistency liquids. The resident's care plan stated to provide diet as ordered: Regular diet, puree texture, and Nectar liquids consistency.b) On 10/14/2025 at 12:40 PM, Dietary Aide #89 reported to the Director of Nursing the resident's drink was honey thick. The resident was given the honey thick liquid by the Director of Nursing (DON) in the dining room during the lunch meal. On 10/15/2025 at 11:16 AM, the resident's care plan was reviewed with the DON concerning the resident's consistency of liquids and that the resident received honey thickened liquids during the lunch meal the previous day.c) The facility's policy and procedure for thickened liquids stated that the order will specify the consistency of the resident's liquids and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #85, #547, #42. Facility census: #106. Findings include: a) Resident #85 On 02/17/25 at 12:35 PM Resident #85 was sitting with two (2) other residents at the dining room table. Resident #38 and #53 were served and being assisted with their meal at 12:35 PM. Staff continued to pass meal trays to other tables in the dining room. Resident #85 did not receive the meal until 12:43 PM after bringing it to the attention of the Director of Activities #41. It was confirmed with the Director of Activities #41 on 02/17/25 at 12:43 PM that Resident #85 had not been provided the right to a dignified dining experience. b) Resident #457 On 02/18/25 at 5:42 PM Resident #42 was a tablemate with Resident #457. Resident #42 was served her tray at this time, however Resident #457 was not served for thirty three (33) minutes afterwards, at 6:15 PM. At this time all other residents had left the dining room. This was confirmed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident Council meeting, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances/concerns from Resident Council. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 106. Findings include: a) Resident Council Meeting Minutes A review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes on 02/18/25 at 10:00 PM, revealed a resident/family concern form dated 07/16/24 that had the following concerns listed from resident council: * Residents requesting drinks be passed with meals instead of before the meal trays make it to the hallways. * Repeated meals being served too frequently. * Directions not being followed on meal tickets. Likes/dislikes not being observed and/or monitored. * Menu does not match the meals being served. Would like an alternative on the menu also. Further review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes revealed an impromptu (AD-HOC), Quality Assurance (QA) meeting was held on 07/25/24 at 2:00 PM as a response…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident council interview, observation and staff interview the facility failed to have the results from the last standard survey posted in a place easily accessible by residents. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident Council During the Resident Council (RC) Meeting on 02/18/25 at 2:00 PM, the RC as a whole said that they did not know they had access to the findings from the last standard survey. During an interview and observation on 02/18/25 at 3:45 PM, at the desk at the front door, The Administrator pulled a book out from behind the desk and stated, It usually sits on the desk not behind it. The Administrator then looked at Receptionist #78 and stated, This book has to stay right here. During an interview on 02/18/25 at 3:48 PM, Receptionist #78 stated, This book has always been behind this desk, since I started here (3) three months ago.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment by not cleaning and sanitizing Resident #10's wheelchair, cleaning the kitchen ceiling and exhaust fan and cleaning the shower room's ceiling and peeling paint. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #10. Facility census: 106. Findings included: a) Sanitary includes, but is not limited to, preventing the spread of disease-causing organisms by keeping resident care equipment clean and properly stored. Resident care equipment includes, but is not limited to, equipment used in the completion of the activities of daily living. On 02/26/25, Resident #10's wheelchair was found to have a dirty footboard with dried food-like substance and liquids. The dirty footborad was observed on 02/17/25 at 08:30 AM, 02/18/25 at 12:15 PM, 02/19/25 at 02:11 PM, and 02/24/25 at 9:20 PM. On 02/19/25 at 02:11, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #111 was interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. These were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #8. Facility Census: #106. Findings included: a) Unlocked medication cart On 02/16/25 at 11:00 AM observation of the treatment cart was sitting in the hallway by the conference room at the beginning of the A hallway. There were no staff members near the cart. There were residents near the unlocked, unattended treatment cart. It was confirmed with Licensed Practical Nurse #7 on 02/16/25 at 11:05 AM this was an accident hazard, at which time she agreed. b) Resident #8 Observation of Resident #8 on 02/16/25 between the hours of 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., revealed the facility reported an elopement of resident on 10/01/24. Resident lacked capacity and had a BIMS score of 3. The resident was assessed as an elopement risk on 09/30/24, 10/23/24, and and 02/14/25. Resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to deploy sufficient nursing staff in order to meet resident needs. This has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 106. Findings include: a) Record review During review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data, the facility flagged for excessively low weekend staffing from the time period of 10/1/24-12/31/24. b) Resident interviews Multiple interviews were conducted with residents who, during the survey process, relayed concerns about staffing at the facility. On 2/17/25 at approximately 11:37 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #14. Resident #14 stated Sometimes it takes hours for them to answer my call light. I got to where I would scream and yell when they wouldn't answer my light and they won't answer that now. There are times I will press my light and I will have to wait three (3) to five (5) hours. On 2/16/25 at approximately 12:04 PM, Resident #45 stated the following about facility staffing, Sometimes I will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and observation the facility failed to ensure residents were receiving food in the amount, type, and consistency to meet acceptable nutritional values. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #58, #20. Facility Census 106. Findings include: a) Resident #58 An observation on 02/17/25 at 12:37 PM, of Resident #58 eating lunch, revealed a meal ticket that had typed on it { Puree, Nectar Thick, Double portion all meals.} During an interview on 02/17/25 at 12:38 PM, Resident #58 non-verbally communicated that he wanted double portions by giving a thumbs up. During an interview on 02/17/25 at 12:40 PM, Nursing Assistant (NA) #122 stated, No, that is not double portions. I will go get him some more. During an interview on 02/17/25 at 12:45 PM, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #67 confirmed that Resident #58's tray did not include double portions. A record review on 02/17/25 at 2:10 PM, revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Record Review, Observations and Resident Interviews, the facility failed to hold or serve food at acceptable/palatable temperatures. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 106. Findings included: a) The facility's Policy and Procedure for Food Temperatures stated, all hot items held and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit, hold foods at or below 41 F (degrees Fahrenheit) for cold foods or above 135 F (degrees Fahrenheit) for hot foods (to keep food out of the temperature danger zone) and Foods sent to the units for distribution (such as meals, snacks, nourishments oral supplements) will be transported and delivered to unit storage areas to maintain temperatures at or below 41 F (degrees Fahrenheit) for cold foods and at or above 135 F ( degrees Fahrenheit) for hot foods. a) On 02/18/25 at 05:55 PM, the temperatures of food provided on the test tray for D hall were completed and verified by Dietary [NAME] #124 included: Regular Steak- 118.6 French fries-110.9 Spinach-120 Pureed meat-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure residents' food likes and dislikes were honored and food substitutes of equal value were offered. Resident Identifiers: #25, #84, #79 and #68 Facility Census: #106 Findings Include: a) Resident #25 On 02/16/25 at 12:15 PM it was observed that Resident #25 had broccoli florets on the lunch tray. The meal ticket stated Dislikes/DO NOT SERVE as Broccoli Florets. It was confirmed with the Director of Activities #41 on 02/16/25 at 12:17 PM that Resident #25 should not have received broccoli, she agreed. On 02/18/25 at the lunch meal Resident #25 was served broccoli again as substitute for roasted Brussels sprouts. It was confirmed with Nurse in Training #108 that Resident #25 should not have received broccoli. On 02/18/25 at the dinner meal Resident #25 was served buttered spinach as a substitute for baby carrots. The meal ticket stated Dislikes/DO NOT SERVE as Buttered Spinach. It was confirmed with Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager #12 that Resident #25 should not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0810 — pattern
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide ordered adaptive equipment to Residents #68 and 60 during meals. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #68, #60. Facility census: 106. Findings include: a) Resident #68 During review of Resident #68's record on 2/17/2025, it was discovered the resident had the following order: Regular diet, Regular texture, Regular/Thin consistency doesn't eat turkey, fish, or chicken for plateguard with meals Diet Active 2/21/2024 12:16 10/18/2024. The resident had the following focus and intervention listed on her care plan: Focus- Resident is at potential nutrition risk r/t (related to) underweight BMI; medical dx (diagnosis) that may affect weight; intakes and nutritional status. Date initiated: 1/31/2024 Revision on: 1/7/2025. Interventions/Tasks- Plateguard with meals. Date initiated: 2/21/2024. During lunch service at approximately 12:15 PM on 2/18/2025, Resident #68 was served lunch with no plateguard. The Administrator acknowledged the Resident did not have a plateguard,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to store and label food, store utensils and ensure food preparation equipment was clean and sanitary in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 106 Findings included: a) Kitchen Observation initiated 02/16/25 at 11:10 AM: Ice chest with scoop laying inside. Handwashing sink had soiled, wet cloth on it and eye wash station/sink had used gloves and a sponge in it. Dry Goods: a) Cart with open bag of Penne pasta was against the sinks - opened , not sealed and not dated. b) Three bags of pasta were found, not sealed and not dated. c) Dented can of pumpkin. d) Brownie base with no date e) Dry cereal in bowls and large plastic containers not labeled or dated. Contained: rice krispies. cornflakes, fruit loops and cheerios. f) Box of oil on the floor propping the door open to the dry goods pantry. g) Bread ([NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and to ensure garbage was not hanging out of the trash can and on the ground below. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 106 Findings included: a) On 02/16/25 at 11:00 AM, the facility's trash dumpsters were observed with lids open, bags of trash overflowing and trash on the ground with items such as paper and gloves observed. This was confirmed by the Dietary Manager in Training (DMIT) at 11:10 AM. The DMIT reported the trash trucks ran on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The Dietary Manager in Training (DMIT) asked if the dumpsters went against the kitchen.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate records for three (3) of 43 residents. The record was inaccurate pertaining to blood pressures for Resident #52. There was discrepancies between orders and the care plan for Resident #457, and daily meal percentages for Resident #106. Facility census: 106. Findings include: a) Resident #52 Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following order: NO BLOOD PRESSURE OR LABS in LUE (Left Upper Extremity). Restricted limb d/t (due to) AV fistula. Every shift. Resident #52 confirmed in an interview on 02/17/25 at approximately 12:15 PM that she had a dialysis access on her left arm. Upon review of the resident ' s medical record, it was determined the facility listed twenty-two (22) times they had taken blood pressure from Resident #52 ' s left arm. Those days are: 1/15/2025 11:00 132 / 76 mmHg Sitting l/arm 1/15/2025 14:47 124 / 70 mmHg Sitting l/arm 1/16/2025 02:24 130 / 74 mmHg Sitting l/arm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse involving Resident #39. This was true for one (1) of nine (9) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect during the survey process. Resident identifier: 39. Facility census: 106. Findings include: During review of a facility reported incident (FRI), on 02/25/25, it was noted the facility reported an allegation of staff to resident abuse on 02/07/25. According to the FRI, a staff member was alleged to have yelled at Resident #39 after she slid out of her recliner and into the floor, stating, You shouldn ' t be getting up without asking for help.Resident #39's daughter reported the incident to the facility, further stating the employee Very roughly jerked Mom's arm and pulled her up out of the bed. The resident's daughter was not present at the facility at the time of the incident. The staff member was determined to to be Nurse Aide (NA) #5. NA #5 was suspended pending investigation. During review of the investigation conducted by the facility, it was noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for two (2) of 43 residents in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifiers: #8 and #44. Facility census: 106. Findings included: a) Resident #44 Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 12/31/24 coded a trunk restraint was used less than daily. Review of Resident #44's physician's orders showed no current or past orders for restraints. Review of the resident's comprehensive care plan showed no current or past focus or interventions related to restraints. On 02/18/25 at 4:57 PM, the Administrator acknowledged Resident #44's MDS with ARD 12/31/24 was incorrect in coding restraint use. b) Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's medical records showed the resident had a diagnosis of depression, unspecified, since 09/05/23. Review of Resident #8's physician's orders showed the resident had been receiving the medication trazodone for major depression since 08/14/24. Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to develop/implement a person centered care plan to meet and/or address the residents medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This failed practice was found true for (2) two of 43 care plans reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #22 and #68. Facility census: 106. Findings include: a) Resident #22 The initial observation, on 02/17/25 at 10:25 AM, showed Resident #22 lying in bed with his head covered up with the sheet and his buttock sticking out of the sheet which revealed that Resident #22 was not wearing a brief. Further observation on 02/18 25 at 2:30 PM, revealed Resident #22 lying in bed with the sheet at his feet and no brief on at this time. An observation on 02/19/25 at 11:00 AM, revealed Resident #22 lying in bed with a sheet and his buttock sticking out of the sheet showing that Resident #22 did not have a brief on. An observation on 02/19/25 at 2:09 PM, revealed Resident #22 up to a Geri chair wearing a black, short sleeve one piece outfit. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for Resident #14 after the order for adaptive equipment during meals was not renewed. This was true for one (1) of 43 care plans reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifier: 14. Facility census: 106. Findings include: a) Resident #14 During review of Resident #14's record on 2/17/2025, it was noted the resident was care planned to have a Kennedy cup with all meals. However, no order for a Kennedy cup was found on the resident's record. Upon further review, it was noted the resident had a recent hospital stay and returned to the facility on 1/12/2025. Review of the resident's completed/discontinued orders revealed she had an order for a Kennedy cup with all meals before leaving for the hospital. After returning on 1/12/2025, the order for the Kennedy cup was not renewed, but the care plan was not updated. At approximately 12:45 PM on 2/25/2025, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #21 confirmed Resident #14 did not receive a Kennedy cup with her meal. Resident #14 had not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct yearly evaluations on Nurse Aides (NA). This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Employee idenifier: Nurse Aide (NA) #4 Facility census: 106. Findings include: a) NA #4 During review of facility staffing documentation on 2/25/2025, it was noted Nurse Aide (NA) #4 had a hire date of 11/19/18, with their last evaluation being completed on 1/25/24. At approximately 12:00 PM on 2/26/25, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) confirmed there was not a current performance review on file for NA #4.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. An insulin pen had not been discarded 28 days after opening. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the facility task of medication storage and labeling. Resident identifier: #56. Facility census: 106. Findings included: a) Resident #56 On 02/18/25 at 8:44 AM, the D Hallway medication cart was inspected with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #26 in attendance. In the medication cart was a Novolog insulin pen for Resident #56. On the pen packaging, the date of opening of 01/10/25 was written in marker. An expiration date of 02/06/25 was also written in marker on the pen packaging. A pharmacy label on the Novolog insulin pen packaging stated the medication could be stored at room temperature for up to 28 days after opening. LPN #26 stated Resident #56 was still prescribed Novolog insulin. She acknowledged the insulin pen had been opened for more than 28 days and should not be used. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to perform laboratory testing according to physician's orders for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: #8 and #95. Facility census: 106. Findings included: a) Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's physician's orders showed an order written on 05/03/24 for laboratory testing consisting of a basic metabolic panel, complete blood cell count, lipid panel, and liver panel to be done every six (6) months, in April and October. On 02/19/25 at 2:25 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide a copy of the laboratory testing results for October 2024, as it had not been scanned into the resident's electronic health record. The DON provided laboratory testing results for a basic metabolic panel, complete blood cell count, and lipid panel that had been performed on 10/08/24. The results did not contain liver panel studies. On 02/19/25 at 3:13 PM, the DON confirmed the physician's order to perform liver panel laboratory testing for Resident #8 in October…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 106. Findings include: A) room [ROOM NUMBER] At approximately 1:50 PM on 2/17/2025, an observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER] of the facility of dirty clothes lying on the floor of the bathroom. Housekeeping Aide #81 stated, One of the residents in there puts her clothes in the floor and the aides are supposed to pick them up when they go in there. At approximately 1:55 PM, MDS Nurse #15 confirmed the dirty clothes on the floor of the bathroom.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-29 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical director/designee attended quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided at the facility. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) QAA meetings Review of the QAA sign in sheets, with the Administrator #56 at 2:40 PM, on 06/28/23 found the medical director/designee did not attend any QAA meetings in the first quarter of 2023. Meetings were held on 01/31/23 and 02/22/23. Review of the sign-in sheets found no indication the medical director or designee attended or was present by telephone, zoom, etc during these meetings. A meeting was not held in March 2023.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documents, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The failed practices were found in the areas of monitoring and prevention of Legionella, establish and implementing a surveillance program, donning appropriate Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) while providing care for residents placed in Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and using proper PPE when entering a Contact Isolation room. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who currently reside at the facility. Facility census 109. Findings included: a) Water management A review of the facility documents found the facility failed to take measures to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the buildings' water systems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with orders for insulin received necessary treatment and services as per their physician orders. The facility failed to recheck blood sugar levels when they were above 400. This was true for one (2) of seven (7) residents reviewed. Resident identifiers: #18 and #503. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) Resident #18 During an interview on 06/27/23 at 2:08 PM, Resident #18 reported he received insulin on a sliding scale. A medical record review, completed on 06/28/23 at 2:15 PM, revealed the following physician order: HumaLOG KwikPen 100 UNIT/ML Solution pen-injector Inject as per sliding scale: if 151 - 200 = 2 units; 201 - 250 = 4 units; 251 - 300 = 6 units; 301 - 350 = 8 units; 351 - 400 = 10 units; 401 - 999 = 12 units administer 12 units and recheck within 2 hours; if remains > 400, notify PCP [primary care physician] for further instruction; subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime related to TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITH KETOACIDOSIS WITHOUT COMA Start Date 05/30/2023 2100 Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #47 expressed to the surveyor he smoked at the facility without staff supervision and kept his own cigarettes and lighter. An interview with the Resident's Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #37 confirmed the Resident had asked her earlier in the day to take him out to smoke. The LPN's only response was, you know you are not allowed to smoke. Twenty seven (27) additional residents were identified as lacking capacity and being able to ambulate/wander throughout the facility. Any of the 27 residents could have obtained access to the cigarettes or lighter, potentially causing serious harm and/or death to self or others due to their cognitive impairments and decreased safety awareness. In addition, Resident #47 was at risk of serious harm and/or death from possible burns resulting from smoking off the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review, observations and staff interview the facility failed to display the daily staff posting at an accessible height for residents to view. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) Observations on 06/26/23 and 06/27/23 found the daily staff posting outside the Administrator's office approximately five feet from the floor. The CMS-672 form completed by the facility notes 50 of the current 109 residents are in a chair most of the time and only 20 of the 109 residents walk independently. On 06/28/23 at 11:58 AM, the Staffing coordinator reported there was only one staff posting in the facility and it is located outside of the Administrator's office. The staffing coordinator acknowledged the daily posting was approximately five feet from the floor and agreed it is too high for residents in wheelchairs to view.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all multiple use vials and/or pens of insulin were dated with the initial date they were opened. This was true for six (6) out of nine (9) vials and/or pens in the Medication cart on the A hall. Resident identifiers: #553, #50, #19, #1, #34, #70, and #97. Facility census 109. Findings included: a) observation of the medication cart During an observation of medications in the A Hall medication cart on 06/27/23 9:00 AM, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #138, found six (6) out of nine (9) insulin vials/pens did not have an open date on the pens and/or vials. The insulin belonged to the residents listed below: Resident # 553 Lispro vial Resident # 50 Humalog vial Resident # 19 Novolog vial Resident # 1 Novolog Pen Resident # 34 Humalog Pen Resident # 70 Humalog Kwik pen Resident # 97 Lantus vial On 06/27/23 at 11:35 AM, the above findings were presented to Corporate Nurse #139. No further information was provided.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were served at the preferable temperature for the residents. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) Food temperatures At 12:50 PM on 06/27/23, the last tray to be served on D hallway belonged to Resident #69. Interim Dietary Manager (DM) #118, obtained the temperatures of the following food items: Pears were 59 degrees Broccoli - 120 degrees Meatballs with gravy - 120 degrees Corn -115 degrees. Coffee - 117 degrees DM #118 said she would like the temperature of hot foods to be at least 140 degrees and cold foods to be no more than 40 degrees at the time of service. DM #118 provided a copy of the food item temperatures obtained before the tray left the kitchen: The corn and broccoli were 175 degrees Meatballs and gravy were 167 degrees Fruit was 36 degrees. Several residents attending the Resident Council Meeting at 3:00 PM on 06/27/23, complained of cold food and coffee served at times, especially if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain properly stored and dated food. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Census 109. Findings included: a) Kitchen On 06/26/23 at 10:55 AM, an initial walk through of the kitchen was conducted with #118, Interim Dietary Manager (DM.) One of the walk-in refrigerators had opened tomato soup stored in a clear container with a lid that did not seal. This green lid did not appear to fit the container and would not close. DM #118 stated the staff must have used the wrong lid. She got the correct lid for the container. At 10:56 AM, the same refrigerator was observed to have a package of Natural Choice sliced ham that was opened and wrapped in cling wrap. There was no expiration or open date on the ham. DM #118 confirmed it was not dated and threw it in the trash. At 10:59 AM, observation of the pantry found a 6.4 oz bag of cornbread stuffing seasoning sitting on the shelf, not boxed, without an expiration date. DM #118 confirmed there wasn't a date of expiration and threw the bag in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain proper garbage disposal. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Census 109. Findings included: a) Dumpsters On 06/26/23 at 11:10 AM, the outside dumpsters were observed with Interim Dietary Manager (DM) #118. The top of the dumpster had two (2) missing lids, and one (1) lid was warped causing a gap of approximately 12 inches in length by approximately 8 inches in height between the dumpster rim and the lid. DM #118 confirmed the facility was aware of the missing lids and they were in the process of replacing them. DM #118 said that the missing lids had been like that for a week but she had not noticed the warped lid.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directive paperwork was part of the resident's medical record. This was true for one (1) of 26 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #30. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) Resident #30 An electronic medical record review, completed on 06/27/23 at 11:20 AM, identified there was a Physician Determination of Capacity, dated 05/08/23, indicating Resident #30 lacked capacity to make her own medical decisions. There was no Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) or Health Care Surrogate (HCS) form scanned in the electronic medical record. On 06//28/23 at 9:45 AM, review of Resident #30's medical chart at nurses station found there was no Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) or Health Care Surrogate (HCS) form on file. During an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:00 AM, the Social Worker confirmed Resident #30 had never completed a Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) prior to losing capacity. The Social Worker then stated to her recollection a Health Care Surrogate had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representatives in a timely fashion when a residents experienced changes in condition, appointments were scheduled, x-rays were done, and new medications were ordered. This was true for two (2) of 25 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: #30 and #101. Facility Census: 109. Findings included: a) Resident #30 A medical record review was completed on 06/28/23 at 10:00 AM. The review revealed a Physician Determination of Capacity, dated 05/08/23, which indicated, Resident lacks capacity to appreciate the nature and implication of health care decisions. Further record review found the following instances where Resident #30's Health Care Surrogate (HCS) was not notified: -05/16/2023 at 1:18 PM Plan of Care Note, IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] Review for unwitnessed fall on 05/13/23 at 1:15 PM. Resident is alert and verbal. Resident has a DX [diagnosis] of left artificial knee, age related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe/functional/sanitary and comfortable environment. The call light did not work in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Slats were missing from window blinds for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Resident #90's wheelchair was in disrepair as well as a night stand for Resident #504. Resident identifiers: #38, #98, #90, #504. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) room [ROOM NUMBER] During the resident council meeting which began at 3:00 PM on 06/27/23, Resident #38 said she resides in room [ROOM NUMBER]. She said her window blinds had missing slats that would allow people from the road outside to see inside her room. She also said the blinds did not open and close easily. Observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #114 on 06/07/23 at 3:56 PM, confirmed she could not get the blinds to open and close correctly and 2 slats were missing from the left side of the double window blinds. RN #114 said she was calling the maintenance man…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident with newly evident or a possible serious mental disorder. This was true for one (1) out of three (3) residents reviewed for the category of PASARR, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier #1. Facility census 109. Findings included: a) Resident #1 A review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 last had a PASARR completed on 12/07/2015. No level II was needed. The PASARR noted the resident had a diagnosis of depression. On 01/26/23 Resident #1 received a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and a new PASARR was not completed. During an interview with the Admissions Director (AD) on 06/28/23 at 11:44 AM, she confirmed the last PASSAR was completed on 12/07/2015. A new PASARR was not completed when the resident received a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder during her stay at the facility on 01/26/23. The AD said she was unaware that a new PASARR needed to be done. She went on to say she thought a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan, for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for the category of accidents , during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #47. Census 109. Findings Included: a) Resident #47 A resident interview was conducted on 06/26/23 at 11:53 AM. The resident stated he did not like the smoking situation at the facility. The resident admitted to going off the property to smoke. The resident also stated he knows he is not supposed to but he keeps his lighter and cigarettes in his murse, attached to his wheelchair. (He defined a murse as a man purse). A follow up interview with the resident on 06/26/23 at 1:00 PM, confirmed the resident had been smoking at the facility for a while. He stated a previous administrator, (name of administrator), had a conversation with the resident about not being allowed to smoke at the facility. During a staff interview with LPN #37, on 06/26/23 at 2:02 PM, LPN #37 stated this resident asked her to take him out to smoke this morning but she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, staff failed to administer medications via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube according to professional standards. Crushed medications and flushes were pushed into the PEG tube and not administered by gravity flow. This was a random opportunity for discovery which has the potential to affect only a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #22. Facility census: 109. Findings include: a) Resident #22 On 06/26/23 at 8:20 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #67 crushed the following medications and mixed each with five milliliters (ml) of tap water in separate medication cups: Baclofen 10 milligrams (mg), Norco 5-325 mg, Labetalol 100 mg, and Atorvastatin 10 mg. RN #67 stopped the continuous feeding, pushing five ml of tap water with a large piston irrigation syringe. RN #67 pushed each med diluted with five ml of tap water with a five ml push of tap water in between. RN #67 flushed the PEG tube with a push of 50 ml of tap water and then restarted the continuous feeding. During an interview on 06/27/23 at 1:47 PM, the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 109 Residents had a functioning call system to alert staff when assistance was needed. Resident identifiers: #98 and #38. Facility census: 109. Findings included: a) Resident #38's interview During the resident council meeting which began at 3:00 PM on 06/27/23, Resident #38 said the call light system was broken in her room. Resident #38 said some men came in here to work and tore it up. Resident #38 said she looked out after her roommate and in the past had called for help for the roommate. Observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #114 on 06/07/23 at 3:56 PM confirmed neither the call light for bed A (Resident #98) or bed B (Resident #38) was working. RN #114 said she was calling the maintenance man to get it fixed. On 06/28/23 at 10:35 AM, observation of the call light system in room [ROOM NUMBER] with the Administrator #56 found the call system was still not working. The Administrator said Resident #38 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the [NAME] Virginia Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were completed correctly for eight (8) of nine (9) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #5, #18, #16, #79, #65, #73, #82 and #76. Facility census: 83 Findings included: a) Resident #5 On [DATE] at 10:00 AM a record review found the POST form dated [DATE] directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) - Attempt resuscitation including mechanical ventilation, defibrillation and cardioversion with full treatments was not completed appropriately. On [DATE] at 10:15 AM an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the POST form was not completed correctly due to missing information relating to the residents address and social security number. On [DATE] at 10:49 PM a review of the Physician Determination of Capacity form dated [DATE] indicated the Resident does not have capacity. According to [NAME] Virginia Center…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the shower room was clean and homelike on the Bluebird Hall. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 83. Findings Included: During an observation of the Blue Bird Hall shower room on 02/23/22 beginning at 3:33 PM and ending at 3:43 PM with the maintenance director the following issues were observed: -- The vent in the ceiling after entering the shower room door was covered with dust. -- The vent in the corner in the ceiling by the toilet was covered in dust. -- The heater grate in the ceiling was covered in dust. -- The light fixture was broken and hanging down. It had three (3) pieces of medical tape on the fixture where someone had attempted to tape it back up, but it was still hanging down from the light. -- The Cove Base molding was peeling away from the wall and a black substance was observed underneath the molding on wall. The maintenance director agreed the bathroom needed some work. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-24 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care Ombudsman of resident discharges from the facility. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalizations during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #336, #79, and #68. Facility Census: 83. Findings included: a) Resident #336 A review of Resident #336's medical record found Resident #336 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the Social Worker's log of transfers from the facility for 07/2021, found Resident #336's name but no proof of Ombudsman notification. In an interview with the Social Worker on 02/24/22 at 12:20 pm she stated she does fax them to the Ombudsman, but has no record to indicate the Ombudsman received the fax. b) Resident #79 A review of Resident #79's record was completed on 02/22/22. The resident was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] at 9:15 AM for a decreased level of consciousness, increased blood pressure, increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-24 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide each resident and/or representative with the bed hold policy at the time of discharge. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization during the long term care process. Resident Identifiers: #336, #79, and #68. Facility Census: 83. Findings included: a) Resident #336 Review of the medical record found no bed hold policy for Resident #336's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. In an interview on 02/23/22 at 3:03 PM the Social Services Director stated we don't have a bed hold policy and I don't inform the ombudsman when they leave. During an interview with the Administrator on 02/23/22 at 3:12 PM, he stated we don't have a bed hold policy, we just keep their bed, we are never at 90% capacity so we don't need a policy. We always let them come back. b) Resident #79 A review of Resident #79's record was completed on 02/22/22. The resident was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] at 9:15 AM for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to provide care required to maintain adequate hygiene to residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Resident identifiers: #78, #54, and #55 Facility census: 83 Findings included: a) Resident #78 On 02/22/22 at 11:08 AM the Resident stated she was waiting on a shower and she is suppose to get one twice a week. The Resident wasn't sure if the showers were scheduled or not. Her hair was disheveled and she was in a night gown. Upon confirmation with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/24/22 at 10:14 AM a shower schedule for the Resident was provided. She only had one shower a week scheduled on Thursdays, day shift, although her choice was two showers per week on Tuesday and Thursday. On 02/24/22 at 10:14 AM the DON provided the Residents shower task sheet. Record review shows the resident only received two (2) showers from her admit date of 01/26/22 through 02/24/22. She should have received nine (9) showers during this time period. This was confirmed with the DON on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This practice was found true for three (3) of three (3) Residents reviewed for the Activity Care Area during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #18, #16, and #82. Facility Census: 83 Findings Included: a) Resident #18 During an interview on 02/22/22 at 12:59 PM, Resident #18 stated what activities, we don't have activities. They do nothing around here. Maybe come talk to me in my room. A review of the monthly activity calendar for December 2021 showed no weekend activities. A review of the monthly activity calendar for January 2022 and February 2022, contained no times for any of the scheduled activities, there were no evening activities and no activities scheduled on Saturday and Sunday. During the Long-Term Care Survey Process, activities were being provided that were not on the large wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of care. This was true for four (4) of 30 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers #79, #336, #67, and #136. Facility census: 83. Findings included: a) Resident #336 The facility failed to provide medical intervention for Resident #336 in a timely manner. Resident #336 had a fall on 07/07/21, the resident complained of pain after the fall on 07/07/21, and did not have an x-ray until 07/13/21 which showed a left hip fracture. In a late entry progress note dated 07/07/21 at 3:33 PM Resident #336 replied (typed as written) .No, I can't get up. I fell earlier and it will hurt if I stand up The Medication Administration Record (MAR) found on 07/11/22 at 8:02 pm Resident #336 received Tylenol 650 mg for leg pain. A progress note dated 07/13/21 at 7:58 pm (typed as written) Resident has been very tearful and emotional this shift. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to deliver respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed during the long care survey process for the care area of Oxygen. Resident identifiers: #67, #74, and #28. Facility census: 83 Findings included: a) Resident #67 On 02/22/22 at 11:23 AM an observation found Resident #67's oxygen tubing for the nasal canula was not dated with a change out date. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/22/22 at 11:25 AM. The Policy and Procedure states the oxygen tubing and storage containers for all respiratory supplies are to be changed weekly and dated with the date it was changed. b) Resident #28 Observation of Resident #28's room on 02/22/22 at 11:05 a.m. found oxygen tubing with a nasal canula laying on the resident's bed with no date that would verify when the tubing was changed. In an interview with temporary Nurse Aide (NA)#7 at 11:05 am on 02/22/22, NA #7 confirmed the tubing should have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner. The foods stored in the kitchen and nourishment refrigerators were not labeled correctly and foods were not discarded when they expired. The facility also failed to keep dishes in an sanitary area, and to keep kitchen equipment clean. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility's kitchen. Facility Census: 83 Findings Included: a) Walk-in Refrigerator During an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Director (DD) beginning on 02/22/22 at 11:00 AM, the following issues were found in the walk-in refrigerator: --Minced Garlic in a jar with an open date of 02/04/22 and had no use by date. --Lemon Juice with an open date of 02/07/22 and had no use by date. --Soy Sauce with an open date of 09/24/21 and had no use by date. --Italian Dressing which was open and not dated to indicate when it was opened and had no use by date. --17 individual packages of cream cheese with a manufacturer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement an infection control program designed to prevent the spread of disease and illnesses. This process had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Resident identifiers # 75 and #76. Facility census: 83. Findings included: a) Resident # 75 During an observation of medication administration by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 94 on 02/24/22 at 8:30 am, LPN #94 failed to place a clean barrier on the bed of Resident #75 prior to sitting the plastic bag the eye drops were stored in, and the eye drops bottle on the bed. After administering the eye drops, the bottle was then placed back in the bag, and the bag was placed back into the medication cart where other resident's medication were stored. In an interview on 02/24/22 at 2:30 pm the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed a clean barrier should have been used prior to placing medication on the resident's bed. b) Resident #76 An observation on 02/22/22 at 11:45 a.m. during the lunch meal pass on the Bluebird Lane hallway found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to main equipment in a safe operating condition. Two (2) ice machines did not have a one (1) inch air gap for drainage. The steamer was leaking water around the seal and onto the a shelving unit containing clean dishes. The walk in freezer had a bucket on the top shelve for draining water because the drain to the outside of the freezer was not working properly. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently receiving nutrition from the kitchen. Facility Census: 83 Findings Included: During an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Director (DD) on 02/22/22 beginning at 11:00 am found the following issues. -- The ice machine in the service hallway and in the kitchen area, did not have a one (1) inch air gap to prevent contamination of back flow. --The steamer was leaking water onto a shelving unit containing clean steam table pans. The DD stated,The steamer is leaking around the seal. We need to get a new one. --The inside of the walk in freezer had a bucket on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview the facility failed to ensure residents were given the opportunity to make choices regarding their bathing preferences and bathing schedules. Resident identifier: #78. Facility census: 83. Findings included: a) Resident #78 On 02/22/22 at 11:08 AM the Resident stated she was waiting on a shower and she is suppose to get one twice a week. The Resident wasn't sure if the showers were scheduled or not. Her hair was disheveled and she was in a night gown. Upon confirmation with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/24/22 at 10:14 AM a shower schedule for the Resident was provided. She only had one shower a week scheduled on Thursdays, day shift, although her choice was two showers per week on Tuesday and Thursday. On 02/24/22 at 10:14 AM the DON provided the Residents shower task sheet. Record review shows the resident only received two (2) showers from her admit date of 01/26/22 through 02/24/22. Resident #78 should have received nine (9) showers during this time period. This was confirmed with the DON on 02/24/22 at 10:17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to report falls which resulted in serious bodily injury to appropriate state agencies as required. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident Identifiers: # 336 and #30. Facility Census: 83. Findings included: a) Resident #336 A review of Resident #336's medical record found, Resident #336 had a fall in the facility in the shower room on 07/07/21. The facility obtained an order on 07/14/21 for: New order for x-ray to Left leg, Right leg, and pelvis. The facility received the xray results on 07/14/21 at 3:00 pm. The results were typed as written: Note Text: X-ray results obtained. Pelvis, Acute displaced Left femoral neck fracture noted. Right Femur, No acute osseous abnormality. Recommend repeat x-ray or CT (Computerized Tomography Scan) in 1 week or sooner if symptoms have not not resolved. Left Femur, fracture of the femoral neck with superior displacement of the distal fragment. PCP (primary care physician) notified. Review of the reportable incidents for the month of 07/2021 found no evidence this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure their narcotics were reconciled every shift. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 83. a) Medication Administration On 02/24/22 at 8:20 AM, a review of the narcotic count book was completed. The following dates were missing signatures between shifts: --02/18/22 7:00 AM shift to 7:00 PM shift --02/22/22 7:00 AM shift to 3:00 PM shift A review of the Controlled Substances Policy states At the End of Each Shift: .Controlled medications are counted at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty determine the count together . On 02/24/22 at 8:40 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the narcotic count book was missing signatures. The DON stated I'll get some education and in-services going right now. No further information was obtained during the survey process. .

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$34,496 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $34,496 — penalty dated 2025-02-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Glenville Health & RehabGlenville, WV 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Highland Ridge Rehab CenterDublin, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5New Martinsville Health & RehabNew Martinsville, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Winchester Health & RehabilitationWinchester, VA 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Laurelhurst Post Acute & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Lynn Care CenterFront Royal, VA 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Tygart Valley Health & RehabilitationBelington, WV 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Blue Ridge Therapy ConnectionStuart, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RIPLEY SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/12/2021
GREYSTONE BRIDGE FUNDING IXOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 05/01/2021
GREYSTONE LOAN AGGREGATOR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 05/01/2021
KIMBLE, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2021
HVH WV MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
RIPLEY OPERATIONS MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
GAAL, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
NICHOLS, BOBBIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$623K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 5%Other / private 8%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $623K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$379per resident / day
operating cost
$11,528per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$410per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515065. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next