Salmon Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation
2811 NE 139th Street, Vancouver, WA 98686 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (360) 574-5247 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.1% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.1% | 17.7% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.9% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.0% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.1% | 22.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.4% | 15.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.4% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.8% | 19.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.6% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
69.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 372 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 180 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 69.0%CMS range 65.1–73.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 8.2–13.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 4.5%CMS range 2.8–7.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.78 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive individualized care plan was developed with specific information for that resident for 4 of 7 sampled residents (1, 4, 5, and 6) reviewed for care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces within the spinal canal), osteoarthritis (a chronic, degenerative joint disease leading to pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility), and presence of an artificial knee joint. Review of Resident 1's 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 02/11/2026, showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact.Review of Resident 1's Care Plan, initiated 02/05/2026, showed the following segments were incomplete and/or not individualized:--Focus: Communication: the resident has risk for complications related to communication impairment due to (Areas to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when medications were not administered in accordance with provider orders and/or within the standard practice administration parameters for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 6) reviewed for significant medication errors. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions, a change in health conditions, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration Section 7.1, General Guidelines, dated January 2023, showed, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR [Medication Administration Record, comprehensive records of physicians' orders and the medications and treatments administered to a resident] immediately following the medication being given.medications are administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently conduct and document pre and post dialysis (a life sustaining treatment for kidney failure) assessments designed to ensure consistent ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility and failed to follow physicians' orders pertaining to dialysis treatment, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 3) reviewed for dialysis. This failure had the potential to place residents who receive dialysis at risk for unmet care needs and dialysis related complications.Findings included .Review of the facility service agreement with the dialysis service provider, dated 01/05/2026, showed the dialysis service provider would, provide services to designated residents and will provide no other services, medical or otherwise, except as such services relate to or are an integral part of the provision of dialysis service.facility [Skilled Nursing Facility, SNF] shall ensure all appropriate medical, social, administrative, and other information accompany…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired and/or BUE (beyond-use date) medications were discarded when expired from 2 of 5 medication carts (Cart B & Cart E) reviewed. The facility also failed to store medication in residents' room in a locked container for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 80). This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the full benefits of the medication, equipment, supplies, and at risk for accessing unsecured medication. Findings included . Expired medications During an observation and review of the E Wing medication cart on 01/09/2026 at 10:22 AM, the cart had two pill packs with expired medication packs. Torsemide (diuretic, or water pill, used primarily to treat fluid retention) 20 mg (milligrams) expiration date 09/21/2025 and Hydralazine (used to treat high blood pressure) 10 mg expiration date 10/11/2025. The cart also had one Ondansetron (used to prevent and treat nausea and vomiting) 4 mg BUE 10/13/2025. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during the lunch hallway meal pass for 1 of 5 hallways (C-Wing) reviewed for lunch meal pass. This failure to perform proper hand hygiene placed residents at risk of cross-contamination, food borne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.During the lunch time dining observation on 01/06/2026 at 1:03 PM, Staff Q, Nursing Assistant (NA), took a meal tray into room [ROOM NUMBER]-B put the tray on the bedside table and pulled the table up to the resident. Staff Q left the room but did not wash or sanitize her hands.In an observation on 01/06/2026 at 1:04 PM, Staff Q grabbed another tray from the cart and took it into room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff Q placed the tray on the bedside table and pulled the table closer to the resident. Staff Q left the room but did not wash or sanitize her hands.In an observation on 01/06/2026 at 1:06 PM, Staff Q grabbed another tray from the cart and took it into room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a signed consent before administering a psychotropic medication (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behaviors) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Record review of Resident 6's Annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 12/18/2025, documented Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE], alert and oriented, and was treated for multiple diagnoses to include anxiety disorder (excessive and persistent fears or worries that interfere with daily life) and bipolar disorder (a mental health condition with significant mood swings of extreme highs and lows that affect the ability to function in daily life). Record review of Resident 6's Order Summary Report documented the following medication ordered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had personal fund accounts established, received accrued interest on those accounts for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 16, 76, and 98) reviewed for Trust Funds interest accrued. This failure placed residents at risk not to receive or have access to monies owed to them.Findings included .Record review of Resident 16's Resident Fund Statement, quarterly statement for the period of 10/01/2025 thru 12/31/2025, showed four credits totaling $7,140.40, four debits totaling $6,801.64, and an ending balance of $381.58. The Statement further showed, YEAR-TO DATE INTEREST PAID. 0.00.Record review of Resident 76's Resident Fund Statement, quarterly statement for the period of 10/01/2025 thru 12/31/2025, showed four credits totaling $2,761.00, three debits totaling $2,343.66, and an ending balance of $852.02. The Statement further showed, YEAR-TO DATE INTEREST PAID. 0.00.Record review of Resident 98's Resident Fund Statement, quarterly statement for the period of 10/01/2025 thru 12/31/2025, showed three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN - a notice of Medicare non-coverage and residents assumption of financial responsibility) to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 16) reviewed for beneficiary notification. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of services and related changesFindings included.Resident 16 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 12/31/2025, documented Resident 16 was severely cognitively impaired.Record review of Resident 16's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form, dated 09/03/2025, showed Resident 16's representative received a call on 09/03/2025, informing them that Resident 16's Medicare Part A coverage would end on 09/05/2025. Record review of Resident 16's electronic health record did not show a SNF ABN was issued.In an interview on 01/09/2026 at 2:36 PM, Staff I, Social Services Director, said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment by not ensuring resident rooms were cleaned for 1 of 11 rooms (C Wing, room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environment. This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the Environmental Services Department. In-Services: Daily Resident Room Cleaning, dated 03/09/2015, showed 7. Dust Mop. The entire floor is to be dust mopped; especially behind, under beds and behind dressers.During an observation on 01/06/2026, in room [ROOM NUMBER] a hospital wristband was on the right side of the bed and on the left side of the bed next to the dresser was a tied-up plastic bag with trash in it on the floor.During an observation on 01/07/2026 at 10:03 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER] the wristband and the bag were in the same location as the day before on the floor.During an observation on 01/08/2026 at 8:40 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER] the wristband and the bag were in the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) test (a rating scale used to assess the severity of involuntary movements that sometimes develop as a side effect of treatment with antipsychotic medications [drugs used primarily to treat symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions]) for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 4 &118) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse medication side-effects, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include a psychotic disorder ([other than schizophrenia] a severe mental illness where a person loses touch with reality). The 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/08/2025, showed Resident 4 was alert and oriented. Review of Resident 4's physician order, dated 12/19/2025, showed Resident 4 was prescribed quetiapine fumarate 25 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written transfer/discharge notice was provided to the resident or the resident representative in a language and manner they understood for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 115) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for not knowing the reason for their transfer or have the opportunity to make decisions about their transfer/discharge rights.Findings included .Record Review of the facility's undated Bed Hold Policy, documented, .Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the resident representatives that explains in detail: .The details of the transfer (per the notice of transfer).Record review of Resident 115's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/05/2025, documented Resident 115 was admitted on [DATE] and had moderate cognitive impairment.Record review of Resident 115's Nursing Note, dated 12/03/2025, stated, .At 0002 [12:02 am], the patient's granddaughter,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) was completed accurately to reflect a resident's health status and/or care needs for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 39 and 22) reviewed for resident assessment. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Dialysis Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis to include acute kidney failure (the sudden loss of the kidneys' ability to filter waste and balance fluids in your body) and chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe kidney damage). The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 7 was cognitively intact, had acute kidney failure, and was not on dialysis (a life sustaining medical treatment that filters waste products and excess fluid from your body when your kidneys fail). Record review of Resident 39's physician orders, dated 07/01/2025, showed Resident 39 was ordered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 116) reviewed for comfort care (medical focus shifts from curing an illness to providing relief from pain and symptoms).This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 11/18/2025, documented Resident 116 was moderately cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 116's Portable Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, dated 11/11/2025, documented Resident 116 was on comfort care. Record review of Resident 116's care plan, dated 12/11/2025, showed a care plan for comfort care was developed a month after Resident 116 was placed on comfort care.In an interview on 01/08/2026 at 12:50 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse, said it was the expectation that Resident 116's care plan was updated when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with grooming for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 80) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified visual field defects. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/13/2025, documented Resident 80 was alert and oriented. Record review of Resident 80's electronic health record, showed resident was scheduled for and received showers on Tuesday, Friday and Sunday. In an interview on 01/06/2026 at 12:45 PM, Resident 80 said the facility staff did not help him shave his facial hair. Resident 80 was observed with unkempt facial hair during the interview. Resident 80 said he was unable to shave himself and needed assistance from staff. In an observation on 01/08/2026 at 1:59 PM, Resident 80 was observed with unkempt facial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure bowel interventions were initiated for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 74) reviewed for quality of care and failed to perform ordered weights for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 13) reviewed for weights. This failure placed residents at risk for discomfort, health complications and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Modification of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool), dated 12/16/2025, documented the resident was alert and oriented. Review of Resident 74's Electronic Health Record (EHR) order, dated 06/04/2025, documented, Polyethylene Glycol Powder [laxative]. Give 17 grams by mouth as needed for Constipation. Dissolve in 8oz [ounce] fluid and drink daily as needed. Review of Resident 74's EHR order, dated 06/29/2025, documented, Bisacodyl [laxative] Rectal Suppository 10 MG [milligrams]. Insert 1 suppository rectally every 24 hours as needed for constipation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen use for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 83) reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed residents at risk for worsening health complications, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings Included. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, undated, documented .1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged return anticipated on 12/19/2025, and re-admitted on [DATE] on hospice. The admission Minimum Data Set, (an assessment tool) dated 11/11/2025, showed Resident 83 was cognitively intact and was on oxygen therapy. In an observation on 01/06/2026 at 10:52 AM, Resident 83 was observed lying in bed with oxygen on per nasal cannula (NC) running at 3 liters per minute (lpm). In an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident census and nursing hours were accurately posted and/or updated daily for 30 of 30 days reviewed for nurse staff postings. This failure placed residents, resident representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and resident census information.Findings included.Record review of facility's policy titled, Posting Nursing Staffing Information Policy dated 10/06/2022, documented, I. The facility will post the following information daily, at the beginning of each shift. The posting shall include:. d. The information should reflect staff absence on each shift due to call-outs and illness.e. Resident Census.Record review of the daily nursing staffing information postings, from 12/07/2025 to 01/06/2026 did not show resident census posted daily.In an interview on 01/09/2026 at 11:05 AM, Staff H, Staffing, reviewed the Daily Nursing Staffing Information postings from 12/07/2025 to 01/06/2026 and said they did not include resident census on them. Staff H said the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff properly donned (putting on) personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 3 sampled resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for infection prevention and control. This failure placed residents at risk for the spread of infection transmission in the facility and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Transmission-Based Precautions [TBP, extra infection control measures used in healthcare settings for people with known or suspected infections that spread easily], dated 02/01/2022, documented: .Contact Precautions [infection control measures used to prevent the spread of infections that are transmitted through direct contact with an infected person or their environment]. 2. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)A. Glovesa. Staff and visitors will wear gloves when entering the room for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident and/or the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL's) for resident's dependent on staff assistance related to bathing for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 & 2) reviewed for ADLs. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet needs, poor hygiene, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's undated Shower/Tub Bath policy showed, At a minimum, the resident will be offered at least 2 full baths or showers per week. Resident 1Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (permanent kidney failure), weakness, and reduced mobility. Review of Resident 1's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/20/2025, showed Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for bathing assistance.During an interview on 11/25/2025 at 1:50PM, Resident 1 said they frequently were not assisted with bathing because they were at their regularly scheduled dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when medications were not administered in accordance with provider orders for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 2 &4) reviewed for significant medication errors. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions, a change in health condition, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration Section 7.1, General Guidelines, dated January 2023, showed, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR [Medication Administration Record, comprehensive records of physicians' orders and the medications and treatments administered to a resident] immediately following the medication being given.Resident 2Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metastatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescriptions provided on discharge accurately reflected the residents reconciled medication list in the discharge summary for 1 of 5 sample residents (Resident 3) reviewed. This facility failure placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects, changes in health conditions, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Discharge Planning, dated 10/01/2021, documented, When the facility anticipates discharge, the facility will prepare discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, the following: .Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications.Resident 3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis (a serious condition that results from the rapid death of muscle tissue). Review of Resident 3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/28/2025, showed Resident 3 had moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medication and/ or treatment errors when medications and or treatments were not administered in accordance with provider orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication errors. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions, a change in health conditions, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration Section 7.1, General Guidelines, dated January 2023, noted, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR [Medication Administration Record] immediately following the medication being given.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus II [a chronic condition characterized by high blood sugar] and Peripheral Vascular Disease [a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to inform the physician about a significant change in the residents' physical condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for notice of changes. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy, Change in a Resident's Condition, undated, noted, The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician / practitioner or physician on call when there has been. significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications).Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, and acute pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/27/2025, showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact.Record review of Resident 1's vital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for 1 of 3 (Resident 1) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living care. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy, Shower/Tub Bath, undated, noted, At a minimum, residents will be offered at least 2 full baths or showers per week.Documentation- if the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken.Reporting-notify the licensed nurse if the resident refuses the shower/tub bath.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, and acute pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/27/2025, showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact.Record review of Resident 1's Progress Note, dated 05/06/2025, showed Staff D, Registered Nurse/previous Director of Nursing Services,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and accurately document a residents wound for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) sampled for wound care. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, dated 10/19/2022, noted, Identification.Weekly skin observations will be conducted by a licensed nurse and findings will be documented in the resident's medical record. The facility will maintain effective and accurate data collection on the development of pressure ulcer/injuries to ensure that systems and processes are maintained to prevent development of unavoidable pressure ulcer /injuries, and that care and treatment is provided to promote healing of pressure ulcer/injury.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, and acute pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas). The Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was free from significant medication errors when medications were not administered in accordance with provider orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for significant medication errors. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions, a change in health conditions, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration Section 7.1, General Guidelines, dated 01/2023, noted, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR [Medication Administration Record] immediately following the medication being given.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [lung disease that make it difficult to breath], acute pancreatitis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received information about the risk and benefits and failed to obtain the resident's informed consent prior to the administration of psychotropic medications for 2 of 6 sampled residents (32 & 78) reviewed for right to be informed and make treatment decisions. These failures placed residents and/or their representatives at risk of not being fully informed about the care and treatment related to the risks and benefits associated with psychotropic medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/17/2024, indicated Resident 32 was alert and oriented. Resident 32 received a physician order for Wellbutrin, an antidepressant, dated 10/24/2024. The October Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Wellbutrin was administered on 10/25/2024, before an informed consent was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess significant weight loss for 1 of 1 sampled resident (71) reviewed for assessment accuracy. This failure placed residents at risk for nutritional and functional decline in overall health status and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility provided policy entitled, Weight Management Guideline, created 05/25/2023, indicated weight change of 10% is significant, greater than 10% is severe. All scheduled weights will be obtained prior to meetings . Identification of weight loss to determine accurate weight with supporting documentation to prevent, monitor, or intervene with undesirable weight. Resident 71 was admitted to facility on 05/16/2024 with diagnoses including severe malnutrition and Diabetes Mellitus. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/24/2024, indicated Resident 71 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 71's alteration in nutritional status care plan, dated 05/26/2024, documented the goal was to maintain stable weights within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recommendations of the Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II were followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (23) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the necessary mental health services and a diminished quality of care. Findings included . Resident 23 was admitted to facility on 11/09/2022 with a diagnoses including Alzheimer dementia and Major depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/04/2024, indicated Resident 23's cognition was not assessed. Resident 23's PASARR 1, dated 06/03/2024, indicated the need for a level II assessment by a licensed mental health professional or mental health agency for individual services. PASARR level II recommendations were not found in Resident 23's medical record. On 10/24/2024 at 9:05 AM, when asked about the PASARR Level 1, dated 06/03/2024 for Resident 23, and if a Level 2 evaluation had occurred, Staff A, Administrator, said it likely was not done. At 3:15 PM, Staff A said the facility had a fax…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to a baseline care plan was not developed to address falls and communication for 2 of 8 sampled residents (66 & 82) reviewed for baseline care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Fall Risk > Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/05/2024, documented Resident 66 was severely cognitively impaired, and had diagnoses including Cognitive Communication Deficit and Cerebrovascular Accident (a condition when blood flow to a section in the brain is suddenly cut off). Resident 66's progress note, dated 09/29/2024, noted, Resident had a fall (unwitnessed) and was found on floor next to the bed . Resident 66's electronic health record (EHR) showed a care plan initiated on 10/02/2024, and noted, The resident is at risk for fall r/t [related to] stroke. The resident has had an actual fall with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing neurological assessments (assess the nervous system and identify any abnormalities that affect function and activities of daily living) were performed after an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 2 sampled residents (66); failed to ensure daily weights were obtained for 2 of 9 sampled residents (75 & 288) reviewed for weight management; failed to ensure the bowel protocol was initiated for 2 of 7 sampled residents (24 & 73) and failed to ensure dental services were obtained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (53) reviewed for quality of care related to neurological assessments, weight management, bowel management, and dental services. These failures placed residents at risk for worsening conditions, health complications and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Neurological Assessments> Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/05/2024, documented Resident 66 was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when providing medical device care and wound care for 4 of 5 sampled residents (62, 240, 241 & 339) reviewed for infection prevention and control. These failures placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for contracting infectious diseases and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, dated 03/28/2024, showed the requirement for facility staff were to use gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities for residents with certain Centers for Disease Control (CDC) targeted infections and for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices. 1) Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/03/2024, documented Resident 62 was alert and oriented and had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 10/21/2024 at 12:26 PM, Resident 62…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — isolatedReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's family and/or representative of a positive COVID-19 (Coronavirus - a contagious disease) results for 1 of 5 sampled residents (75) reviewed for infection prevention and control. This failure placed residents and/or resident's representative at risk of not being knowledgeable to make decisions about their care in relation to the facility's COVID-19 management plan and a diminished quality of care. Findings included . The facility's policy, entitled Reporting to: Residents, Representatives, and Families During COVID-19 Pandemic, dated 05/15/2020, documented, The facility will inform residents, resident representatives, and families by 5:00 p.m. the next calendar day following the occurrence of either a single confirmed infection of COVID-19, or three or more residents or staff with new-onset of respiratory symptoms occurring within 72 hours of each other. Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission 5-Day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive individualized care plan was developed with specific information for that resident for 6 of 6 sampled residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) reviewed for care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Congestive Heart Failure, Hypothyroid, Hyperlipidemia (HLD - high cholesterol). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/19/2024, showed Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and utilized a walker to assist with ambulation. Review of Resident 1's Care Plan, initiated 07/14/2024, showed the following segments were incomplete and/or not individualized: --Focus: The resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self-care performance deficit AEB [as evidenced by] Intervention: physical assist as needed with Intervention: provide supervision and cueing as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when medications were not administered in accordance with provider orders for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 5, & 6) reviewed for significant medication errors. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse medical conditions, a change in health condition and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Medication Error Reporting, undated, noted, Medication error/variance shall be defined as any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or resident harm while the medication is in the control of the health care professional . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure, Hypothyroid, Hyperlipidemia (HLD - high cholesterol). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 07/19/2024, showed Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and utilized a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall mats (a cushioned surface used for the purpose of reducing injuries from falls) were in place on either side of the resident's bed, as directed in the comprehensive care plan, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk of a fall with injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness and reduced mobility. Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/05/2024, indicated the resident was dependent for bathing needs and required maximum assistance to roll right and left. Resident 1's care plan, initiated 11/18/2020, showed Resident 1 was, At risk for falls due to history of falls, impaired balance/poor coordination, potential medication side effects, unsteady gait and cognitive deficits. An intervention, initiated 12/04/2020, showed, Staff to place fall mats on either…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medication errors when medication orders for bedside administration were not followed for 1 of 7 sampled residents (1) reviewed for medication errors. This failure placed residents at risk for a decline in medical condition and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (changes on how the brain functions), acute respiratory failure, and chronic kidney disease. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/16/2024, documented the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A provider order for Resident 1, dated 02/12/2024 at 2:26 PM, documented, [Okay] for bedside administration of budesonide-formoterol inhaler [used to control and prevent wheezing and shortness of breath]. [Okay] for bedside administration of albuterol sulfate nebulizer solution [used to treat lung problems]. A Provider Communication Note,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication refrigerator temperature logs were consistently maintained in 2 of 2 sampled medication rooms (1st Floor and 2nd Floor) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications with unknown potency. Findings included . 1) On 12/08/2023 at 8:51 AM, the first-floor medication room was observed with Staff B, Director of Nursing Services and Registered Nurse. The medication refrigerator temperature log, dated October 2023, documented, Twice daily refrigerator temperatures recommended. The October 2023 temperature log was completed 17 times out of the 62 opportunities, a 27% completion rate. The temperature log, dated November 2023, documented the temperature log was completed 22 times out of the 60 opportunities, a 35% completion rate. The temperature log, dated December 2023, documented the temperature log was completed 6 times out of the 14 opportunities, a 42% completion rate. At 8:51 AM, Staff B said the temperature logs for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed and provided consent before administering a psychotropic (mind altering) medication for 2 of 5 sampled residents (29 & 21) reviewed for right to be informed and make treatment decisions related to unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents and/or resident representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about psychotropic medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/10/2023, documented Resident 29 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A physician's order, dated 02/13/2023, documented Resident 29 was prescribed sertraline (a psychotropic medication to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain, provide, and/or assist with completing advanced directives (ADs) for 3 of 16 sampled residents (38, 54, and 278) reviewed for ADs. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their health care preferences and/or have their decisions honored. Findings included . The facility's Advanced Directives Policy, revised 03/31/2023, defined an Advanced Directive as a written instruction, such as a living will or a durable power of attorney for healthcare, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. Under Specific Procedures/Guidance: 7) Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advanced directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. 8) If the resident indicates that he or she has not established advanced directives, the facility staff will offer assistance in establishing advanced directives. 8b) Nursing staff will document in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the resident and/or the resident's representative describing the reason for transfer for 2 of 5 sampled residents (10 & 33) reviewed for transfer notification requirement. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their condition, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/05/2023, showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A progress note, dated 11/12/2023 at 9:30 AM, documented pt. [patient] sent to hospital for deterioration of symptoms . called 911 for patient to transfer to hospital, N-95 mask placed on pt for transport. Report given to ambulance staff and paper work [sic] for hospital. Resident 10's Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not show she was provided a written notice of the transfer. 2) Resident 33 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written Bed-Hold notice to the resident or resident's representative at the time of transfer to the hospital for 4 of 5 sampled residents (10, 40, 13 & 33) reviewed for bed hold notifications. This failure placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . 1) Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/05/2023, showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The electronic health records (EHR) documented Resident 10 transferred to an acute hospital on [DATE]. No documentation was noted that contact was made to the resident or resident's family regarding a Bed-Hold. 2) Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 10's EHR documented he was transferred to an acute hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan related to nephrostomy tube (a tube that drains urine from the kidney to an external bag) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (13) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. catheter care. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs, delayed care, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 10/24/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 10/12/2023, documented, New nephrostomy to gravity. Flush tube with 10cc [cubic centimeters] NS [Normal Saline] daily. A physician's order, dated 10/24/2023, documented, Keep abdominal binder in place to reduce risk of dislodging the nephrostomy tube. Resident 13's comprehensive care plan did not show documentation the care plan addressed the nephrostomy tube. On 12/08/2023 at 10:23 AM, an observation of the nephrostomy tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate bowel interventions for 2 of 2 sampled residents (10 & 268) and failed to perform ongoing neurological assessments (assesses the nervous system and identifies abnormalities affecting function and activities of daily living) for a resident after an unwitnessed falls for 2 of 5 sampled residents (21 & 26) reviewed for quality care related to bowel management and neurological assessments. These failures placed residents at risk for interventions not be intimated, discomfort, health complications and a diminished qualify of life. Finding included . <Bowel Management> 1) Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/05/2023, showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The facility census showed Resident 10 was admitted to an acute hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The Bowel Movement (BM) task sheet documented Resident 10 did not have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident weights were monitored per physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (13) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk of malnutrition, delayed wound-healing, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/24/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and did not reject evaluation and/or care (marked behavior not exhibited) during the assessment period. The MDS documented the resident was transferred out of the facility from 08/22/2023 to 08/29/2023, from 09/14/2023 to 10/05/2023, and from 10/12/2023 to 10/20/2023. A nutritional risk care plan, initiated 08/23/2016 and revised 03/31/2023, documented the interventions, Review weights and notify physician and responsible party of significant weight change. Resident 13's weight record documented a weight of 143.6 pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis treatment and care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (26) reviewed for dialysis. This failure placed residents at risk of unidentified medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Finding included . The Hill Valley Healthcare Hemodialysis Access Care policy (the policy used by the facility), undated, showed, The facility is committed to following current CMS (Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services), state guidelines, and clinical standards of practice in providing care for residents with End Stage Renal Dialysis receiving hemodialysis at an outpatient dialysis facility. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and was receiving Hemodialysis. The admissions Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 11/12/2023, showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) for residents dependent on staff assistance were provided related to bathing for 7 of 10 sampled residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7) reviewed for ADLs for dependent residents. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), a comprehensive assessment tool, dated 09/04/2023, documented the resident required 1-person extensive assistance with ADLs including 1-person total dependence with bathing. The facility shower schedule, undated, documented Resident 1 was scheduled for 2 showers a week. The bath report documented Resident 1 received 3 of 8 bath or shower opportunities from 08/16/2023 to 09/15/2023. On 09/20/2023 at 1:51 PM, Resident 1 said she has been in the facility over three weeks and has only received one shower during the first few days she was in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-12-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing hours were posted daily for 22 of 30 days reviewed for nurse staff posting. This failure placed residents, resident representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and census. Findings included . The nursing daily staff postings, dated 11/04/2023 through 12/04/2023, were not completed for 22 of 30 days. The facility did not provide the daily staff postings for 11/08/2023 through 11/28/2023, 12/02/2023 and 12/03/2023. On 12/07/2023 at 2:53 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said the staff postings were not consistently done. No WAC Reference .
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH 6 SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/08/2023 |
| IDELS, SHIMON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| SCHWARTZ, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| SALMON CREEK SNF OPERATIONS MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505522. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.