The McKendree Post Acute & Rehabilitation
4347 Lebanon Road, Hermitage, TN 37076 · Non profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (615) 871-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $252,242 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-03)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.2% | 14.0% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.0% | 6.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 43.0% | 13.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.0% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.4% | 31.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 5.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.1% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.4% | 16.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.7% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 8.0% | 79.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.6% | 22.6% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.71 | 1.56 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.8%CMS range 42.2–56.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 8.1–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 2.9–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 173.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-10-03 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment that prevented an incident of entrapment for 1 (Resident #145) of 77 sampled residents reviewed for assist bar use. The facility's failure to ensure a safe environment resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ-a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more conditions of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) when Resident #145, a vulnerable resident assessed to be cognitively impaired, became entrapped between the assist bar and mattress. The facility also failed to try an appropriate alternative prior to installing an assist bar, failed to perform side rail assessments and failed to obtain informed consent prior to installation of the assist bars for Resident #1, #3, #5, #8, #13, #14, #20, #23, #25, #26, #27, #28, #31, #33, #36, #38, #39, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #50, #51, #52, #54, #56, #57, #58, #60,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility investigation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent nonconsensual sexual contact between Resident #200 and 3 residents (Resident #8, #112, and #126). On 8/16/2023, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #12 observed Resident #200 standing over Resident #126 pulling down his brief and Resident #126 was resisting the actions. CNA #12 left Resident #200 and Resident #126 alone in the room to get assistance in removing Resident #200 from the room. CNA #12 failed to protect Resident #126 from further potential nonconsensual sexual contact with Resident #200. Nursing staff failed to provide interventions and within 4 hours, Resident #200 was observed touching Resident #112's genital area while sitting in the 2 East common area. Nursing staff failed again to intervene appropriately and within 2 hours, Resident #200 had nonconsensual sexual contact with Resident #8 when she grabbed him and gave him an open mouth kiss then began licking his face. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, website www.localconditions.com review, medical record review, facility document review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an avoidable accident for 2 (Residents #200, and #201) of 22 residents reviewed. Resident #200 and #201 moved from a safe environment to an unsafe environment when Resident #201 exited the building unsupervised, on 8/12/2023, and Resident #200 exited the building unsupervised, on 8/13/2023. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). The facility also failed to accurately assess 22 (Resident #11, #22, #29, #31, #45, #53, #72, #73, #74, #76, #90, #91, #110, #112, #114, #118, #135, #140, #144, #200, #201, and #250) sampled residents reviewed for wandering/elopement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility document review, and interview, the facility failed to provide nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and physical well being for 1 (Resident #361) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for falls. Resident #361 with a pain level of 10 (highest level of pain expressed) and unable to move her left leg was transferred by the Director of Nursing (DON) from the floor to a sitting position in a wheelchair. The facility's failure to ensure safety for Resident #361 after an accident resulted in a harm when Resident #361 screamed in pain when she was transferred to the wheelchair by the DON Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall-Clinical Protocol, dated 3/29/2017, revealed, .In addition, the nurse shall assess and document/report issues with the following .Recent injury especially fracture or head injury .Pain . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #361 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, Delivery Manifest Report Details, and interview, the facility failed to provide admission medication according to physician's orders and per facility policy for 1 of 3 (Residents #2) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, .Automated Dispensing Machine for First Dose and Emergency Medications, dated 1/2025, revealed, .The facility may use automated dispensing machines.for first dose and emergency medications.authorized personnel who have received training, have access to medications.the director of nursing or designee authorizes staff and administers user names and passwords for access to the dispensing machine.Upon receipt of a new medication order, facility staff should obtain the total number of doses necessary to cover the period of time from the administration of the first dose until it is expected to become available from the pharmacy. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-03 · tag F0569 — widespreadNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to convey the resident's funds and a final accounting of those funds for residents who were discharged , evicted, or expired within 30 days to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate for 60 (Residents #61, #83, #252, #304, #305, #306, #307, #308, #309, #310, #311, #312, #351, #352, #353, #354, #355, #356, #357, #358, #359, #360, #361, #362, #363, #364, #365, #366, #367, #368, #369, #370, #371, #372, #373, #374, #375, #376, #377, #378, #379, #380, #381, #382, #383, #384, #385, #386, #387, #388, #389, #390, #391, #392, #393, #394, #395, #396, #397, #398) of 64 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Refund Policy, revised [DATE], revealed .To ensure that all residents accounts are reconciled and maintained according to federal and state regulations .It is our policy that the Business Office Manager and Administrator will be responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to use good hygiene practices and techniques, to change gloves and wash hands between tasks, to keep the ice machine clean and sanitary to prevent contamination of the ice, sanitize visibly soiled equipment associated with ice handling, and to wear hair restraints to prevent hair from contacting food. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Services, revised December 2008, revealed .Gloves are considered single-use items and must be discarded after completing the task for which they are used. The use of disposable gloves does not substitute for proper handwashing .Hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints must be worn to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils and linens . Review of the facility's policy titled, Ice Machines and Ice Storage Chests, revised January 2012, revealed .Ice machines and ice storage/distribution containers will be used and maintained to assure a safe and sanitary supply of ice .Clean and sanitize the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Maintenance Service, revised December 2009, revealed, .Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment .The Maintenance Department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times .Functions of maintenance personnel include, but are not limited to .Maintaining the building in compliance with current federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines .Maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards .Providing routinely scheduled maintenance service to all areas .The Maintenance Director is responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance service to assure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment are maintained in a safe and operable manner .A copy of the maintenance schedule shall be provided to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, Facility Assessment Tool, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity was maintained for 1 (Resident #253) of 2 sampled residents reviewed by failing to provide communication in the resident's native language. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Translation and/or Interpretation of Facility Services, dated 11/2020, revealed, .This facility's language access program will ensure that individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) shall have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility .The coordinator of this facility's language access program is the director of social services, or his/her designee .All LEP persons shall receive a written notice in their primary language of their rights to obtain competent oral translation services free of charge .A staff interpreter who is trained and competent in the skill of interpreting .Family members and friends shall not be relied upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify Responsible Party and Physician for a fall for 2 (Residents #48 and #68) of 13 residents reviewed. The facility also failed to notify Responsible Party of weight loss and respiratory illness for 1 (Resident #24) of 6 residents reviewed. Facility also failed to notify Responsible Party of Sexual Abuse in a timely manner for 4 (Residents #8, #112, #126 and #200) of 11 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Notification of Changes, revealed, .The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification . Review of the medical records revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Shortness of Breath,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, facility reported incident, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #201) of 2 sampled residents reviewed were free from the use of physical restraints. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Restraint Free Environment, dated 8/8/2023, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility that each resident shall attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of the restraints for discipline or convenience and limits restraint use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraints .Using bed rails to keep the resident from voluntarily getting out of bed .Using devices in conjunction with a chair .that the resident cannot remove and prevents the resident from rising .Placing a chair or bed close enough to a wall that the resident is prevented from rising out of the chair or voluntarily getting out of bed . Review of the facility investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) and Adult Protective Services (APS) within the required guidelines. On 8/16/2023 staff observed and reported Resident #200 having nonconsensual sexually aggressive contact with Residents #8, #112, and #126. The allegations of sexual abuse were not reported to the SA and APS until 8/22/2023. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised 2017, revealed, .reports of resident abuse .shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies .thoroughly by facility management .investigations will also be reported .Administrator will keep the resident and his/her representative (sponsor) informed of the the progress of the investigation Administer will ensure that any further potential abuse .is prevented .All alleged violations involving abuse .will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse which involved 4 residents (Resident #8, #112, #126 and #200) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised 2017, revealed, .reports of resident abuse .shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies .thoroughly by facility management .investigations will also be reported .Administrator will keep the resident and his/her representative (sponsor) informed of the the progress of the investigation Administer will ensure that any further potential abuse .is prevented .All alleged violations involving abuse .will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to .State licensing/certification agency .local/State Ombudsman .Resident's Representative .Adult Protective Services .alleged violations of abuse .will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to send a copy of the transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 4 (Residents #30, #34, #48, and #118) of 4 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 8/29/2023, and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Lymphedema, Hyperlipidemia, and Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #30 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed the Ombudsman was not notified Resident #30's discharge. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction, Hypertensive Urgency, and Combined Rheumatic Disorders of Mitral, Aortic and Tricuspid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written information regarding the bed hold policy for 4 (Residents #30, #34, #48, and #118) of 4 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns, revised March 2017, revealed, .Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy .Prior to transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the resident representatives that explains in detail: a. The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds; b. The reserve bed payment policy as indict by the state plan (Medicaid residents); c. The facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid residents), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period (Medicaid residents); and d. The details of the transfer (per the Notice of Transfer) . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, facility medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to submit the Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment within 14 days of completion for 1 (Resident #138) of 39 sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #138 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hyperlipidemia, Bipolar disorder, Chronic systolic heart failure, Hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, and Pain. Review of the medical record for Resident #138 revealed the Quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 8/10/2023. Review of the medical record for Resident #138 revealed the Quarterly MDS assessment completed on 8/10/2023 was submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services) on 10/3/2023, 55 days after completion. During an interview on 10/3/2023 at 1:20 PM, the Corporate Clinical Specialist confirmed, The assessment was completed but the MDS staff failed to submit the MDS.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately completed for 2 (Residents #30 and #133) of 39 sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the RAI Version 3.0 Manual revealed .The MDS contains items that reflect the acuity level of the resident, including diagnoses, treatments, and an evaluation of the resident's functional status .The RAI process .require that .the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources .Those sources must include the resident and direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical record, physician, and family, guardian, or significant other as appropriate or acceptable . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Lymphedema, Hyperlipidemia, and Chronic Embolis.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide services specified in the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 (Resident #31) of 6 sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR [Preadmission Screening and Resident Review] Program, dated February 2023, revealed .This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs .All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorder or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening .PASARR Level II-a comprehensive evaluation . Review of medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan for 4 (Residents #8, #112, #126, and #200) of 39 sampled residents reviewed. The findings include . Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans-Comprehensive, revised December 2010, revealed, Care Plans .Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative (sponsor), develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain .The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans .When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition .When the desired outcome is not met .When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay .At least quarterly . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to conduct Quarterly Care Conference meetings with the resident or resident's representative, for 12 (Residents #4, #24, #25, #31, #34, #37, #41, #53, #56, #69, #129, and #139) of 47 sampled residents reviewed. The facility also failed to update the care plan with appropriate interventions following a fall for 2 (Residents #48 and #253) of 47 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans-Comprehensive, revised December 2010, revealed, .Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative (sponsor), develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain .The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans .When there has been a significant change in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain personal hygiene for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living for 2 (Residents #6 and Resident #42) of 6 sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, dated March 2018, revealed, .Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living .Resident who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good .grooming and personal and oral hygiene .Refuses care and treatment to restore or maintain functional abilities and .he or she has been offered alternative interventions to minimize further decline .the refusal and information are documented in the resident's clinical record . Review of medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete 72 hours of neurological evaluations, in accordance with the facility's policy and professional standard of practice, for 7 (Residents #31, #48, #53, #54, #126, #129 and #144) of 14 residents reviewed. The faclility also failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for 5 (Residents #62, #63, #101, #124, and #367) of 7 residents reviewed for missed medications. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Falls-Clinical Protocol, revised 3/29/2017, revealed, .As part of the initial assessment, the licensed nursing staff will complete a fall assessment within 24 hours of admission. A fall assessment will also be completed after any subsequent fall, quarterly, and with significant change in status .the nurse shall assess and document/report issues with the following .Neurological Status-Neuro checks should be completed on all unwitnessed falls or falls with head…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #37) of 39 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Pain Medications, with revision date 10/2010, revealed, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guideline for assessing the resident's level of pain prior to administering analgesic pain medication .The pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to resident comfort .Pain Management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established goals .Conduct a pain assessment as indicated. The initial assessment is comprehensive and should follow the facility pain assessment procedure .Administer pain medications as ordered .Document the following in the resident's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #253) of 9 sampled residents received trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for a resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. The findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches which are culturally-competent, account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatized .Trauma results from and event .War .Traumatic life events . Review of Hospital #6's History and Physical for Resident #253 dated 1/31/2022, revealed, .She has had cognitive issues since at least 2019. Family says at times .she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment and services for 1 (Resident #253) of 9 sampled residents who had a history of trauma, psychosocial adjustment difficulty, and behaviors, to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered using approaches which are culturally-competent, account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatized .Trauma results from and event .War .Traumatic life events . Review of Hospital #6's History and Physical for Resident #253 dated 1/31/2022, revealed, .She has had cognitive issues since at least 2019. Family says at times .she will get frantic as she does not know where her children…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications for 1 (Resident #253) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary were limited to 14 days duration. The facility failed to obtain a physician's assessment or documented rationale for continued use of the medication. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Unnecessary Drugs-Without Adequate Indication for Use, dated 10/2022, revealed .It is the facility's policy that each resident's drug regimen is managed and monitored to promote .the resident's highest practicable mental, physical and psychosocial well-being free from unnecessary drugs .Adverse Consequences .is a broad term referring to unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have, such as impairment or decline in an individuals' mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status .Dose is the total amount/strength/concentration or a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in 4 resident rooms (Rooms #153, #162, #277, #286) out of 152 resident rooms, 1 dining room (1-East Unit Dining Room) out of 3 dining rooms, 2 Hallways (1-East Unit Hallway between 2-North Unit and 2-East Unit) out of 6 hallways, and 2 (Soiled Laundry Room, Central Supply Room) out of 10 employee work rooms, and 1 (Elevator 1-East )out of 2 elevators observed. The findings include: Review of facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment revised 7/2023 revealed, In accordance with residents' rights the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment .This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility .does not pose a safety risk .Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment .The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store foods in safe and sanitary manner as evidenced by expired, unlabeled and undated foods. Review of the facility policy, Refrigerators and Freezers for storage, labeling and dating foods, revised December 2014, revealed .All food shall be appropriately dated to ensure proper rotation by expiration dates .Received dates (dates of delivery) will be marked on cases and on individual items removed from cases for storage . Use by dates will be completed with expiration dates on all prepared food in refrigerators .Expiration dates on unopened food will be observed and use by dates indicated once food is opened . Observation on 6/17/19 at 9:06 AM in the kitchen with the Food Service Executive Chef present revealed the following in the Walk-In Dairy Cooler: 3 Pint containers of tomatoes opened and undated. Observation on 6/17/19 at 9:16 AM in the kitchen with the Food Sercive Executive Chef present revealed the following in the Large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the facility policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store linens to prevent the spread of infection. The findings include: Facility policy review, Cleaning Laundry Room, undated, revealed .to provide adequate guidelines for cleaning laundry rooms .dust ceilings, lights, vents, spot clean walls, doors, furniture, etc . Observation on 6/19/19 at 1:30 PM of the laundry room with the executive Director and the Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor revealed an excessive amount of lint between two dryers, on the ceiling, the doors, walls, air vents and in the dryer. Further observation in the clean laundry room revealed a dirty fan in the laundry area blowing air on the clean linen. Observation on 6/19/19 at 1:30 PM of two of four dryers in the laundry room were labeled,Urgent, clean lint compartment daily. Observation on 6/19/19 at 1;45 PM of the Dryer Lint Cleaning Log revealed the staff had signed the log with no sequencial dates. Continued observation of the cleaning log revealed, Dryer must cleaned after every load. Interview with the Supervisor of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, facility documentation, observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain equipment in a safe operating condition related to the kitchen dairy cooler door not sealing and broken door latch, the kitchen large walk-in cooler with a broken door latch, and dryer lint build up with visible lint on the vents, between the dryers, and in the dryer drums. The findings include: Facility policy review, Work Requests, revised 9/24/14, revealed .To maintain facilities in prime condition by reporting and requesting building/facility repairs according to established procedures . Review of the Facility Work Order form dated 6/18/19 revealed .check cooler doors, ordered new latch sets and door gaskets, will repair when parts arrive .the latch parts were ordered and were to be delivered on 6/20/19 .the gasket parts were ordered and were to be delivered on 6/20/19 . Observation on 6/17/19 at 9:06 AM in the kitchen with the Food Service Executive Chef present revealed the Walk-in Dairy Cooler door not sealing and the outside latch was broken. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to protect Resident #130 from physical abuse by a facility Certified Nurse Technician (CNT). The findings include: Facility policy review, Abuse Prevention/Reporting Policy and Procedure, updated 5/9/18, revealed .Every resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to employees, other residents, physicians, consultants, volunteers, family members, legal guardians, friends or other individuals .the facility has developed and instituted policies and procedures for screening and training employees in regard to the protection of residents and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect the usage of a lift for 1 of 58 residents (#73) reviewed which resulted in a fall. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety and Muscle Weakness. Medical record review of the undated bed side care plan revealed Resident #73 required 2 persons for assist with transfers. Medical record review of the care plan dated 11/7/18 revealed .Assist x 2 with Transfers . Medical record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 required extensive assistance with 2 staff members for transfers. Medical record review of the post fall investigation dated 12/5/18 revealed .I was in the patients room using the Sara lift to stand him up to change his brief . Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #5 on 6/18/19 at 5:23 PM at the nurse station on 2 North revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 of 58 residents (#73) reviewed related to not having 2 staff members operating a lift during a transfer. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Lifting and Machine, Using a Mechanical revised 2017 revealed .At least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with mechanical lift . Medical record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety and Muscle Weakness. Medical record review of the undated bed side care plan revealed Resident #73 required 2 persons for assist with transfers. Medical record review of the care plan dated 11/7/18 revealed .Assist x 2 with Transfers . Medical record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 required extensive assistance with 2 staff members for transfers. Medical record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-06-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview the facility failed to obtain an advance directive for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident #124) reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy Informed Consent and Advance Directives dated 11/26/16 revealed, .Resident will be educated upon admission and throughout their stay on availability of and procedure for securing advance directives .All residents will be given this information on admission or as needed .The resident's advance directives will be maintained in the clinical record under the Advance Directive Tab . Medical record review revealed Resident #124 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Bilateral Hydronephrosis, Muscle Weakness, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Hypertension, Anemia, Bilateral Ureteral Obstruction and a history of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Bladder Cancer. Medical record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #124 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-06 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to submit the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) in a timely manner for 1 of 6 sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted [DATE] and discharged [DATE] due to death in facility with diagnoses including Generalized Muscle Weakness, Lack of Coordination, Malaise, Aphasia, Dysphagia, Acute Kidney Failure, Hyperosmolality and Hypernatremia. Interview with the MDS Coordinator #1 on 6/6/18 at 9:47 AM in the MDS office revealed Resident #1 was discharged [DATE] due to death in facility. Continued interview revealed MDS Coordinator #1 was unable to locate the Discharge MDS for Resident #1. Further interview confirmed MDS Coordinator #1 stated, the regulations state a Discharge tracking MDS should be completed within 14 days after the resident's discharge. She also confirmed the facility failed to complete the Discharge MDS following the death of Resident #1.
- Potential for harm · D2018-06-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to document notification on the SBAR coomunication form (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) for a fall in the facility for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #12) reviewed for falls. Findings include: The facility policy Notification of Change dated 11/26/18 revealed .Documentation of any communication or attempts to contact medical staff or families should be entered into medical records such as the SBAR by the licensed nurse . Medical record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Hypertension, Gout and Chronic Kidney Disease. Medical record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Medical record review of the SBAR form revealed the .Name of Family/Health Care Agent Notified . was blank and undated. Further review revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-06-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to have a stop date for a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #70 and Resident #130) reviewed. Findings include: The facility policy Antipsychotic Medication Use dated 11/26/17 revealed .The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. The duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order . Medical record review revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, and Muscle Weakness. Medical record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Medical record review of the Physician Orders dated 3/9/18 revealed .Diazepam Tab (psychotropic) (tablet) 5mg (milligrams) 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$252,242 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $252,242 — penalty dated 2023-10-03
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-09 for 74 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN 2 SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 05/27/2026 |
| IDELS, SHIMON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/17/2024 |
| GARAFOLA, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/17/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in TN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445491. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-10-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.