Brentwood Place Two

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 101.3 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.51 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.53 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.66 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from neglect when they failed to conduct adequate therapeutic drug monitoring of Resident #1's lab levels who was receiving lithium. This led to Resident #1 being admitted to acute care hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with acute toxic encephalopathy secondary to lithium toxicity. Lab records revealed Resident #1's lithium level was 5.3 mmol/L (critical level) when he arrived at the hospital. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 06/01/23 and ended on 10/02/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began on 02/27/24. This failure placed residents at risk for neglect and for serious adverse outcomes including drug toxicity, need for hospitalization, and/or death. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], reflected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen did not have an excessive dose, for an excessive duration, with inadequate monitoring for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to conduct adequate therapeutic drug monitoring of Resident #1's lab levels who was receiving lithium. This led to Resident #1 being admitted to acute care hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with acute toxic encephalopathy secondary to lithium toxicity. Lab records revealed Resident #1's lithium level was 5.3 mmol/L (critical level) when he arrived at the hospital. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 06/01/23 and ended on 10/02/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began on 02/27/24. This failure could place residents taking psychotropic medications at risk for serious adverse outcomes including drug toxicity, need for hospitalization, and/or death. Findings included: Record Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to enter a physicians' order for Nitroglycerin 0.4mg sublingual tablet that was administered to Resident #1 on 06/19/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician and a delay in treatment and worsening of their condition.Findings included Review of Face Sheet dated 07/02/2026 reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 was diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (chronic metabolic disease where the body either resists insulin or doesn't produce enough of it, leading to high blood sugar), Peripheral Vascular Disease (slow, progressive circulation disorder characterized by narrowed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 3 of 10 residents restrooms (Resident Restroom [ROOM NUMBER], Resident Restroom [ROOM NUMBER], and Resident Restroom [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for hot water, 1 of 10 (Resident Restroom [ROOM NUMBER]) for restroom leaks and 1 of 8 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for bed linens. The facility failed to ensure residents had hot water in Resident Restroom [ROOM NUMBER], Resident Restroom [ROOM NUMBER], and Resident Restroom [ROOM NUMBER] on 3/3/26 and 3/4/26.The facility failed to ensure Resident Restroom [ROOM NUMBER] was free from leaks on 3/3/26 and 3/4/26. The facility failed to ensure Resident #58 was provided with clean and sanitary pillowcase on 3/3/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases, unsanitary environment and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide drinks, including water and other liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #29, Resident #15 and Resident #89) reviewed for hydration. The facility failed to ensure Residents#29 received a drink during lunch service on 3/3/26.The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 received a drink during lunch services on 3/3/26 and 3/4/26.The facility failed to provide Resident #89 drinking water on 3/3/26. These could place residents at risk of discomfort, dehydration, and/or a diminished quality of life. 1. Record review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 3/5/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission of 1/6/25. Resident #29 had the following active diagnoses: need for assistance with personal care, Thiamine Deficiency (condition that causes neurological and cardiovascular disease stemming from malnutrition or chronic alcohol use),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety for the facility's only kitchen.The facility failed to ensure the holding temperature was below 40 degrees F (Fahrenheit) for pureed potato salad served for lunch on 3/4/26.This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination.Findings included:During an observation and interview on 3/4/2026 11:46 a.m., of the lunch service revealed pureed potato salad was at 90 degrees F. (Pureed foods are smooth, lump-free food, made by blending or grinding cooked foods for those with chewing or swallowing difficulties).The Dietary Manager proceeded to scoop out the pureed potato salad to individual portions and prepared about 12-16 small cups, covered them and placed them in the freezer to cool them down further. The Dietary Manager stated the pureed potato salad should be at 41 degrees F and needed to cool down further before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to provide adequate foot care for Resident #66. This failure could place residents at risk for infection, impaired mobility, and poor foot health as well as a decline in their quality of life.Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 3/5/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE]. Resident #66 had the following active diagnoses: need for assistance with personal care, chronic pain, unsteadiness on feet, mood disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder ( a chronic mental health condition defined by excessive, uncontrollable, and persistent worry about daily events) and Major Depressive Disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent intense feelings of sadness, hopelessness and loss of interest in activities).Record review of Resident #66's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one of two (Residents #92) residents reviewed for feeding tubes. The facility failed to ensure LVN G administered medications through Resident #92's G-Tube by gravity, and instead she pushed the water flushes and medication with the plunger and syringe on 03/03/26. This failure could place residents at risk of abdominal discomfort, nausea and tube rupture.Findings included: Record review of Resident #92's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/25/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Staff assessed Resident #92 to be severely cognitively impaired. She received 51% or more of total calories through tube feeding. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (a disruption in brain function caused by a violent blow) and dysphasia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of Resident #92's Care Plan, dated 09/17/25, reflected, [Resident #92]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for one of two (Resident #71) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure the supplemental oxygen was provided at the physician ordered rate for Resident #71. This failure could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk of oxygen toxicity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #71's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/05/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. She had a BIMS score of 4 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, pneumonia (serious lung infection), dementia, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). She was dependent on ADLs and required maximum assistance with transfers. The MDS assessment did not indicate she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured and stored in accordance with current accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 medication carts (Nurse cart for Hall 200) observed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure LVN G kept Resident #92's medications secured during medication administration on 03/03/26. This failure could place residents at risk of gaining access to unlocked medications that were not prescribed to them. Findings included: During an observation on 03/03/26 at 11:09 a.m. revealed LVN G was at the medication cart in front of Resident #92's room. LVN G poured two tablets of Tylenol 325 mg from the bottle and placed the tablets into a plastic sleeve and crushed them. LVN G poured the crushed pills into a plastic medication cup and added 10 cc of water to the cup. LVN G then filled a plastic cup with water. LVN G then put on gloves and a gown and entered Resident #92's room, leaving the medication on top of the medication cart out of the sight of LVN G.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the therapeutic diets as prescribed by the attending physician for 1 (Resident #13) of 3 residents observed for therapeutic diets.The facility failed to provide Resident #13 with his regular diet minced and moist (MM5) texture as designated on his physician order on 3/4/2026.This failures could place residents at risk for poor intake, weight loss, unmet nutritional needs, and choking.Findings included:Record review of Resident #13's annual MDS Assessment, dated 01/03/2026, reflected Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included stroke (disruption in blood flow to the brain), hypertension (high blood pressure), malnutrition, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing, indicating a disruption in moving food or liquid from the mouth to the stomach). He had BIMS of 0 indicating Resident #13 had severe cognitive impairment.Record review of Resident #13's Care plan, revised on 1/20/2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Staff provided consistent showers/baths for Resident #1. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/19/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. His BIMs score of 06/15 indicating sever cognition impairment. His functional status reflected extensive assistance with bathing. Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive plan of care dated 05/27/25 reflected, Focus: Resident#1 has…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-02-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX