Ft. Worth Southwest Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 198 beds and averages 143.1 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residnets right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one (Residnet #1) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1, who was unable to give consent for sexual activity, from sexual abuse after Resident #2 was discovered in her bed with his pants off and buttocks exposed, laying behind her on 06/30/24. The facility failed to put interventions in place to protect Resident #1 after allegations were made that Resident #2 placed his penis in her mouth on 06/30/24. An IJ was identified on 07/03/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:32 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/04/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents, establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement their abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy to ensure Resident #1 was safe from sexual abuse when Resident #2 was found in her bed on 06/30/2024. Resident #2 had not been on any supervision from the time the incident occurred through 07/03/2024. The facility failed to follow their policy and investigate the alleged or suspected sexual abuse of Resident #1 and provide notification and information to the proper authorities according to state and federal regulations. An IJ was identified on 07/03/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:32 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/04/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement their abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy and investigate an alleged or suspected sexual assault when Resident #2 was found in Resident #1's bed on 06/30/2024. The facility did not provide notification and information to the proper authorities according to state and federal regulations. An IJ was identified on 07/03/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:32 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/04/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility must store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for storage.The facility failed to secure 10- 1 oz Zinc Oxide Ointment tubes observed on three linen cart pockets and 2- 1oz Zinc Oxide Ointment in a resident open top-drawer.This failure could place residents at risk of unauthorized access to over-the-counter drug or prescription. Findings included:During an observation on 05/20/26 at 8:25 A.M., there were two 1oz tubes of Zinc Oxide ointment in a open top drawer.During an observation on 05/20/26 at 10:10 A.M., of the linen cart side pocket revealed 2-1oz tubes of Zinc Oxide ointment. During an observation on 05/20/26 at 10:15 A.M., of the linen cart side pocket revealed 3-1oz tubes of Zinc Oxide ointment.During an observation on 05/20/26 at 10:20 A.M., of the linen cart side pocket revealed 5- 1oz tubes of Zinc oxide ointment.During an interview on 05/20/26 at 10:30 A.M., CNA A stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record revie, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and support for daily living safely for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide a space free of severe hoarding of various items that left a narrow walkway of approximately 1 foot wide from Resident #1 door to bed. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe, unclean and uncomfortable environmentFindings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/20/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], diagnoses included unsteadiness of feet (an indicate various underlying issues, often related to balance problems), generalized anxiety disorder (mental health condition characterized by excessive, uncontrollable worry about everyday issues, affecting daily functioning and quality of life), major depressive disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care, including but not limited to the right to participate in the planning process, including the right to identify individuals or roles to be included in the planning process, the right to request meetings and the right to request revisions to the person-centered plan of care for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #76) reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plan.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #76 and/or the resident's representative were invited and given the opportunity to participate in the resident's care plan meeting.This failure could place residents at risk of a loss of independence, loss of opportunity to participate in planning of their care, psychosocial health, and quality of care.In a record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 05/08/2026, reflected a [AGE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to ensure the handwashing sinks #1 and #2 garbage receptacle contained only paper towels.The facility failed to ensure that stored canned goods had uncompromised seals and were free from dents.The facility failed to ensure to discard spoiled items stored in the walk-in refrigerator.These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, cross contamination, and infection.During an observation of the #1 handwashing sink's garbage receptacle on 05/06/2026 at 8:56 a.m., the following was revealed: #1 and #2 handwashing sinks garbage receptacles contained items other than disposable paper towels, including used gloves and plastic wrapping.During an observation of the dry storage room on 05/06/2026 at 9:30 a.m., the following was revealed:1x cream of celery soup 50 oz. (3 lbs. 2 oz.) written date 03/26/2026, best by date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for catheter care for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #14, and Resident #122) reviewed for infection control.Resident #14's catheter bag was touching his fall mat. Resident #1 and Resident #122's catheter bags hung under their wheelchairs and touched the floor in the physical therapy room. This failure could place residents at risk for infection.Findings included: Resident #14 Record review of Resident #14's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted with a primary diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease (arteries become narrow due to build of plaque, reducing blood flow to heart). Other pertinent diagnoses include congestive heart failure (heart cannot pump enough blood), cerebral infarction…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative(s) in writing of the discharge, reasons for the move, and right to appeal in writing and in a language and manner they understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 (Resident #32 and Resident #139) of 6 residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to notify the residents or the residents' representative or POA of the transfer or discharge with the reasons for the move in writing in a language and manner they understand for Resident #32 and Resident #139.The facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman involving Resident #32 and Resident #139.This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without alternative placement, discharge options, their rights to appeal and access to advocacy services. A record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of accident hazards for 1 of 6 (Resident #72) residents reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision.The facility failed to ensure Resident #72 did not obtain electronic cigarettes in her room.This failure could place residents at risk of being in an unsafe environment and at risk of accidents and injuries.Findings included:Record review of Resident #72's face sheet, dated 05/07/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility with a primary diagnosis of idiopathic epilepsy (seizures that occur without a known cause). Other pertinent diagnoses include abnormalities of gait and mobility (abnormal walking pattern), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body does not respond properly to insulin leading to high blood sugar levels), mild cognitive impairment (noticeable cognitive decline, normal with aging), dementia (brain disease that alters brain function, causing cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adhere to the federal requirements regarding residents' rights. The facility failed ensure a safe and decent living environment for two (Resident #2 and Resident #3's rooms) of five rooms reviewed for decent living environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's room was free of dirt, debris, and sticky floors on 10/10/25.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's broken window was repaired. These failures could place residents at risk or diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 10/10/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, with an admission date of 03/31/25. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of Convulsions (involuntary, uncontrollable muscle contractions), Dysarthria (difficult or unclear articulation of speech), Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Chronic Viral Hepatitis C (long term infection of the liver), and Vascular Dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one of five (Resident #1 Room) resident rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure a tube of Zinc Oxide Ointment and a bottle of Antiseptic Skin Cleanser were not left in Resident #1's room. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion.Findings included:In an observation and interview on 10/10/25 at 10:11 AM, an uncapped, 1 oz tube of Zinc Oxide ointment was observed on Resident #1's nightstand, and a 4 oz bottle of Antiseptic Skin Cleanser was observed on top of Resident #1's refrigerator, which sat on top of the nightstand. Resident #1 stated staff must have left those items in his room this morning. Resident #1 stated the staff kept all of his medications.In an interview on 10/10/25 at 10:45 AM, RN A stated the aides were responsible for applying creams and ointments. She stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents records reviewed for treatment documentation. 1. The facility failed to document timely when Resident #1 refused to leave the courtyard area of the facility until 1:00 AM on 10/08/25. This failure could affect the residents' medical record not being an accurate representation of the resident's medical condition or medical needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/10/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, with an initial admission date of 06/17/25, and a readmission date of 10/02/25. Resident #1 had a diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (progressive disorder that affects movement, balance, and coordination), Type 2 Diabetes (body does not use insulin properly or cannot produce enough insulin), Schizoaffective Disorder (disorder with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$23,923 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $23,923 — penalty dated 2024-07-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX