Village Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 87.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.87 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.98 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #8) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Hospice Aide did not abuse Resident #8. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 05/08/24 and ended on 05/08/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could affect the residents at the facility and place them at risk for physical, verbal, and/or psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #8's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cerebral palsy, non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, contractures of muscles, and need for assistance with personal care. The MDS further reflected the resident was dependent of one staff member for all ADLs including bathing, dressing, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision on 05/08/24 when Resident #1 sustained contusions and bruises to left side of face and left eye from an incident/accident. On 05/09/24, Resident #1 was diagnosed with a subdural hematoma ([SDH] occurs when a blood vessel in the space between the skull and the brain [the subdural space] is damaged) and admitted to the hospital. The facility failed to oversee the implementation of resident care policies. LVN A failed to initiate and document investigation of an incident/accident on 05/08/24, per the facility's policy and procedure Fall Management Program, when Resident #1 sustained an fall. These deficient practices of inadequate supervision placed residents at considerable risk of serious injury, harm, and/or impairment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests and rodents for 2 of 3 halls (Hall 200 and Hall 400), and 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure 200 and 400 halls, and the kitchen were free from pests.This failure could place residents at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life.Findings included:Hall 400Interview on 07/02/26 at 9:57 AM, Resident # 1 stated he had seen a few flies in his room. He said, most of the time, it was in the evening. He said he waved them off and found them irritating. Observation on 07/02/26 at 10:20 AM revealed a fly flying around and landing in Resident #1's room.Interview on 07/02/26 at 10:26 AM, Resident #2 stated he sometimes saw flies in the dining room, and they bothered him. He said he used someone else's fly swatter when they came near him.Hall 200Observation and interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to identify and treat swelling on Resident #1's cheekbone following a fall and after Hospice Nurse E and CNA B had identified it on 10/09/25. The failure placed residents at risk for delayed treatment. Findings included:Record review of Resident 1#'s annual MDS assessment, dated 09/13/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, non-Alzheimer's Dementia (brain disorder caused by damage to nerve cells in the brain), anxiety disorder (a mood disorder characterized by excessive, persistent, and uncontrollable fear and worry about everyday situations), depression (a mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for medication regimens. The facility failed to 's Pharmacy Consultant recommended the facility include anti-psychotic side-effect monitoring for Resident #10's Risperdal and Perphenazine medication orders on 06/18/25 and 07/23/25. This failure could place residents receiving medications at risk for adverse consequences and could cause a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/16/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. His active diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive fear, worry, and anxiety that interfere with daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility did not monitor Resident #10 for side-effects related to the use of the anti-psychotic medications Risperdal and Perphenazine. This failure could place the residents at risk for adverse consequences of medication. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/16/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. His active diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive fear, worry, and anxiety that interfere with daily life), depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest), and schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects how…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 6 carts (Cart #3) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Cart #3 was secured when not in use.This failure could place residents at risk of gaining access to medications not prescribed to them, leading to allergic reactions or overdoses. Findings included:Observation on 08/13/25 at 2:44 PM revealed Medication Cart #3 was stored at the nurse's station. Observation of the lock revealed it was in the secured position, but a check of the drawers revealed drawer #2 was able to be opened. The other drawers on the cart were locked and were not able to be opened. RN A obtained the keys to the cart, unlocked the cart, and then re-locked the cart; however, drawer #2 on the cart continued to be unlocked. Observation of the contents of drawer #2 revealed it contained the prescription medication cards for the residents of the 200 Hall. The medications included blood pressure medications, anti-viral medications, sleep medications,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that that the facility is free of pests and rodents in 1 of 6 resident rooms (Resident #73) reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #73's room was free of ants. This failure could place residents at risk of having pests in their rooms and insect bites. Findings included: Record review of Resident #73's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/26/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS reflected the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 8. The MDS also reflected diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (condition where brain dysfunction occurs due to issues with the body's metabolism), adult failure to thrive (a syndrome characterized by weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity, often accompanied by other symptoms like dehydration, depression, impaired immune…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurate for two (Resident #18 and Resident #28) of six residents reviewed for clinical records. 1. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for Resident #18 dialysis port site monitoring, vital signs, and documentation of the pre and post dialysis Vitals on the communication form. 2. The facility failed to document when the physician was notified when Resident #28's blood sugar exceeded 250. This failure could place residents at risk for incomplete and inaccurately documented medical record that included their progress treatment, services, and interventions. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #18's electronic record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #18 had diagnoses which included acute kidney failure (when kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from blood) and chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 3 (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) of 10 rooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to maintain total visual privacy by allowing the window blinds for room [ROOM NUMBER], 308, and 310 to be missing several slats. This failure placed residents at risk of a lack of privacy, feeling insecure, or uncomfortable in their rooms. Findings included: Observation on 07/09/24 from 8:12 AM-8:40 AM of the facility's Secure Unit revealed the window blinds in Rooms 302, 308 and 310 were broken and missing several blind slats. Interview and observation on 07/10/24 at 2:42 PM with CNA D revealed she had been employed for four weeks. She stated when something needed to be fixed in a resident room, she reported it to the charge nurse. CNA D observed room [ROOM NUMBER] and stated she was aware of the window blinds being broken, but she could not recall how long they had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure a new resident was not admitted with a mental disorder, unless the state mental health authority determined, based on an independent physical and mental evaluation performed by a person or entity other than the State mental health authority prior to admission, that the individual requires the level of services provided by a nursing facility and if the resident requires such level of services, whether the resident requires specialized services for one of six residents (Resident #10) reviewed for PASRR screening. The MDS Coordinator failed to ensure Resident #10's PL1 was accurate with the proper mental illness diagnoses when he was admitted . This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's Face sheet, dated 07/11/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for one (Resident #48) of three residents reviewed for feeding tubes. LVN C failed to flush Resident #48's g-tube with 60cc of water before her bolus feeding (feeding method using a syringe to deliver formula through feeding tube) as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in health or adverse effects due to inappropriate management of G-tube care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #48's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cerebral palsy, quadriplegia, seizure disorder, and dysphagia (trouble swallowing) and required a feeding tube. The MDS further reflected the resident was dependent of one staff member for all ADLs including bathing, dressing, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$19,009 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $10,842 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
• $8,167 — penalty dated 2024-05-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $126K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX