Mesquite Village Wellness & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 58.8 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 90 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.68 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.49 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.74 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for elopement risk. On 05/08/24 around 2:00 PM, Resident #1 was found ¼ of a mile from the facility walking on the sidewalk of a two-lane road going into a residential area, after he had eloped from the facility while wearing a wander guard and at the facility for respite care. The non-compliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 05/08/24 and ended on 05/10/24. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents who used wander guard at risk for serious injuries. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/07/24, revealed that Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Dementia (a general term for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for five of fifteen resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, and #5) on Hall 4, and two of three shower rooms observed for cleanliness. The facility failed to ensure Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, and #5 on Hall 4 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure the shower room on Hall 4 and the shower room near the nurses' station was thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life.Findings included:During an interview on 06/16/26 at 9:45 a.m., Complainant #1 stated when she visited the resident's room, it was always dirty and unclean. She stated they always had to clean the resident's room and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for two of seven residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse by Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse or neglect that could lead to serious harm.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/05/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: acute osteomyelitis (severe bone infection), non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified heel and midfoot, type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar), protein-calorie malnutrition (a severe nutritional deficiency resulting from inadequate intake of protein and calories), schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia (such as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care plan was reviewed and revised after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for one (Resident #1) of 12 residents reviewed for Care plans. The facility failed to ensure their IDT or MDS [BH1] Coordinator added Resident #1's ICD Code L89.300 Pressure injury of buttock, unstageable diagnosis to his care plan when on 01/31/24, he was diagnosed with an unstageable pressure injury of buttock and prior to his discharge on [DATE]. This failure could affect all residents by placing them at risk of not having a complete profile which could result in inadequate care and result in a decrease in health and psycho-social well-being.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] by RN W revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE]. He had a BIMS score 15 (no cognitive impairment) and had upper and lower extremity impairment on both sides and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and did not develop pressure ulcers unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable for one (Resident #1) of 12 residents reviewed for Wound care services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from pressure injuries and on 01/31/24 he developed a pressure injury of buttock, unstageable and wound care treatments were started. Subsequently, on 09/27/24 Resident #1's Dr./NP ordered for him to get a wound care consult because he had an open sacral wound, however it was not completed because ADON G said he did not have a wound. Additionally, Resident #1 was never assessed by the Wound care doctor prior to his discharge on [DATE] and from 09/02/24 to 12/17/24 there was 34 times the CNA's coded Resident #1's skin observations as red, discoloration and open. This failure could place all residents at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure they provided care included but was not limited to assessing, evaluating, planning and implementing resident care plan and responding to resident's needs for one (Resident #1) of 12 residents reviewed for Nursing services. 1.The facility failed to ensure ADON G referred Resident #1 to the Wound care Doctor after he was diagnosed with an open sacral wound on 09/27[BH1] [BH2] /24 and prior to discharge on [DATE]. 2.The facility failed when ADON G stated she was aware of the Physician's order dated 09/27/24 for a wound care consult for Resident #1 but felt he did not have a wound on his buttock so she did not follow the Doctor's order from 09/27/24 to 12/19/24. These failures could affect all residents by placing them at risk of continued wound issues and infections if Doctor's orders were not followed, which could result in a decrease in health and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure they provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of 12 residents reviewed for Pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN H and LVN X gave Resident #1 his Ammonium Lactate ointment on his lower legs as prescribed by his doctor on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE][BH1] prior to discharge on [DATE]; Subsequently, the nurses stated it was unavailable with no documentation as to why. This failure could affect all residents by placing them at risk of going without their medications which could cause a resident to have a decline in health and psycho-social well-being.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] by RN W revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE]. He had a BIMS score 15 (no cognitive impairment)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for one (Resident #1) of 12 residents reviewed for Medical records. The facility failed to ensure the IDT or MDS Coordinator added Resident #1's Pressure Injury on buttocks, unstageable diagnosis to his EMR profile, after he was [BH1] diagnosed on [DATE] with it and prior to his discharge on [DATE]. This failure could affect all residents by placing them at risk of getting missed care and treatments if no one were aware of their diagnosis, which could lead to decreased health and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] by RN W revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE]. He had a BIMS score 15 (no cognitive impairment) and had upper and lower extremity impairment on both sides and dependent -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 3 (Residents #10, #12, and #36) of 4 residents reviewed for call lights.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 had their call light within reach while resident was in their wheelchair.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had their call light within reach while in their bed.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 had their call light within reach while in their bed.This failure had the potential to affect residents who were unable to call staff for assistance, placing them at risk for falls, incontinence episodes, unmanaged pain, delayed treatment during a potential medical emergency, and emotional distress due to feelings of helplessness or fear.Findings Included:Record review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents had suitable, nourishing meals and snacks outside of scheduled meal service time for 1 of 1 facility reviewed. -The facility failed to ensure snacks were prepared, provided, and offered to residents after breakfast, lunch, and dinner.This failure could affect all residents who received meals served from the facility's only kitchen by placing residents at risk for, unplanned weight loss, and side effects from medication given without food, and diminished quality of life.Findings Included:In a confidential group meeting on 08/06/2025 at 10:05am 6 out of 14 residents stated the facility did not offer or pass out snacks after each mealtime. 6 out of 14 residents stated the facility stopped offering and passing out snacks about three months ago. The residents' stated snacks were not offered or passed this morning after breakfast. The residents stated they wanted snacks to be offered after each meal or always have the snacks visible after each meal. In an interview with LVN F on 08/06/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety.1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the freezer were labeled with the item description (handwritten or manufacturer's label), had the received by date, the opened date and/or the consume by or expiration by dates.2. The facility failed to ensure food items in the dining room were labeled with the item description (handwritten or manufacturer's label), had the received by date, the opened date and/or the consume by or expiration by dates.3. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff wore proper hairnets while working in the kitchen.These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.Findings Include:Observation of the side-side refrigerator on 08/05/2025 at 9:01 am revealed the following:- 1 large bag of tater tots (shredded potatoes) sealed with no item description label or distinguishing date.-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-06-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX