No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lacey Post Acute & Rehabilitation

4524 Intelco Loop SE, Lacey, WA 98503 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (360) 491-9890 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 491-9890 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$7,443 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $7,443 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
4800 College St SE · (360) 486-2900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.4 mi
4776 Whitman Ln SE · (360) 412-5962 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.4 mi
4700 Yelm Hwy SE · (360) 438-0203 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5001 College St SE · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5501 Wiggins Rd SE · (509) 388-5892

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.7%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.6%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.5%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.8%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.2%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.6%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.5%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.7%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%13.4%12.0%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 371 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 236 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.7%CMS range 55.5–64.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 7.1–11.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 4.3–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
54.5%
Total nursing turnover
57.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 118.6 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-06)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-09-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered oxygen according to the provider orders for 1 of 3 sample residents (1) reviewed for respiratory care. This failure resulted in harm to Resident 1 when their oxygen was not maintained at the ordered rate and the resident experienced hypoxia (low oxygen blood levels) and requried hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for shortness of breath, unmet care needs and a decreased quality of care. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypersensitivity pneumonitis (a rare immune system disorder affecting the lungs, resulting in irreversible damage to the lungs.) The discharge Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/03/2023, showed Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living and required oxygen therapy prior to and during their stay at the facility. The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to hold enteral feedings (Method of delivering liquid nutrition directly into the stomach), for 1 of 3 (Resident 2) residents reviewed for enteral feeding. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving unnecessary enteral feedings and the potential for a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Record review of facility policy titled Enteral Feedings , dated 10/01/2021, documented Enteral feedings will be administered in accordance with the physician/practitioner order and as reflected in the resident's Advanced Directive if known. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses for rehabilitation services. Record review of the 5-day minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 04/12/2026, documented Resident 2 was moderately cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 2's Physician orders dated 04/30/2026 showed an order to hold enteral tube feedings for a period of 30 days. Record review of Resident 2's May…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were dressed in personal clothing for 1 of 4 (Resident 1) residents reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for an undignified appearance and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Record review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, undated, documented, 1. The Resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communications with and access to,persons and services inside and outside the Facility.In an observation and interview on 05/18/2024 at 1:20 PM, Resident 1 was sitting in a wheelchair with a nightgown on with no additional clothing or garments. Resident 1 stated he would much rather have his own clothes on, but was unsure of who could help him get dressed. In an interview on 05/18/2026 at 1:23 PM, Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Resident care coordinator (RCM), said Resident 1 should be wearing daytime clothing and not just a nightgown. In an interview on 05/18/2026 at 1:28 PM, Staff C, Nursing Assistant,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident census and nursing hours were accurately posted and/or updated daily for 7 of 18 days reviewed for nurse staff postings. This failure placed residents, resident representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and resident census information.Findings included. Record review of the facility policy titled, Posting Nursing Staffing, dated 10/06/2022, documented, Procedure-The facility will post the following information daily, at the beginning of eachshift. The posting shall include:a. The facility nameb. The current datec. The total number of staff and actual hours worked by the followingcategories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible forresident care per shift:i. Registered Nursesii. Licensed Practical Nursesiii. Licensed Vocational Nursesiv. Certified Nurse Aides In an observation on 05/18/2026 at 12:08 PM, the facility staffing document was dated 05/11/2026. In an interview on 05/18/2026 at 2:42 PM, Staff F, Staffing coordinator,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide goods and services to residents that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress for 1of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for neglect. This failure placed residents at risk of injuries related to falls and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses for rehabilitation services. Record review of the 5-day minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 03/24/2026, documented Resident 1 was moderately cognitively impaired.Record review of Resident 1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 1 had a fall from bed on 03/24/2026 at 9:15 PM, stating he needed to have a bowel movement.Record review of Resident 1's EHR showed Resident 1 had fallen from bed on 03/25/2026 at 1:06 AM, stating he needed to have a bowel movement.Record review of Resident 1's EHR showed facility intervention to include a 1:1 sitter for safety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to collaborate care and services and complete assessments for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for dialysis (a procedure that acts as an artificial kidney, filtering waste products, toxins, and excess fluid from the blood). This failure placed residents at risk for compromised health outcomes and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Record review of the facility policy, titled, End Stage Renal Disease (permanent kidney failure, requiring dialysis)-Care of the Resident, undated, documented, (5) The nursing facility staff will provide immediate monitoring and documentation of the status of the resident's condition and resident's access site(s) upon return from the treatment to observe for bleeding or other complications. (3.b) the communication process between the nursing facility and the dialysis center that will reflect ongoing communication, coordination, and collaboration. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect for 2 of 4 (Resident 2 and Resident 3) sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for negative outcomes to mental and psychosocial well-being and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses for rehab services. Record review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/11/2026, showed Resident 2 was alert and oriented.In an observation and interview on 03/16/2026 at 12:16 PM, Resident 2 stated she was waiting for stomach medication. During the interview, Staff B, License Practical Nurse (LPN) entered the room to the side of Resident 2's bed and stated, hey honey I got your pills. Staff B then opened the package of 2 pills and said, here honey put these under your tongue.In an interview on 03/16/2026 at 12:20 PM, Resident 2 said that no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 4 (Resident 1) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure caused Resident 1 to be given psychotropic medication without prior consent. This failure placed residents at risk for increased side effects and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses to include anxiety (a mental and physical state characterized by intense, and persistent worry or fear) and depression ( a serious mental disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and low energy). The 5 -day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/04/2026, showed Resident 4 was alert and oriented.Record Review of Resident 1's physician order, dated 03/02/2026, showed Haldol (medication to treat mental health conditions) 2 mg (milligrams) orally once daily, to be held until physician order was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices when handling medication for 1of 3 (Resident 2) sampled residents reviewed for infection control and prevention. This failure placed residents at risk for the spread of infection transmission in the facility and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Record review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control General Guidelines, dated July 2023, indicated, Integration of glove use along with routine hand hygiene is recognized as the best practice for preventing healthcare-associated infections.In an observation on 03/16/2026 at 12:16 PM, Staff B, License Practical Nurse (LPN), entered Resident 2's room to the left side of their bed and said they had stomach medication to give her. Staff B opened two single dose packages with bare hands dropping each pill into their palm. Staff B then handed both pills directly from their hand into Resident 2's hand. Staff B instructed Resident 2 to place the dissolvable pills under her tongue.In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge plan was in place for 1 of 3 (Resident 1) sampled residents reviewed for admission/discharge/transfer. This failure placed residents at risk for an unsafe discharge to the community, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] following hospitalization. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 07/25/2024, indicated Resident 1 was alert and oriented. Review of Resident 1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 08/04/2025 at 1:56 PM, showed a conversation between Staff C, Social Services Assistant and Resident 1's provider which indicated Resident 1 was not recommended to discharge home alone due to safety concerns. Review of Resident 1's EHR dated 08/05/2025 at 10:59 AM, indicated Resident 1 was a maximum assist with dressing, dependent with toileting, refusing to work on bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation, and indicated poor safety awareness. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received pain medication timely for 2 of 4 [Residents 1 and 2] reviewed for Quality of care. This failure caused Resident 1 and Resident 2 to experience ongoing pain and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's Pain Management, policy, undated, documented The organization will ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation following a hospitalization. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/13/2025, indicated that Resident 1 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 09/22/2025 at 12:51 PM, Resident 1 said that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] during the late afternoon. Resident 1 said that she was not given pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented on 1 of 4 (Resident 2) residents reviewed for infection control. This failure placed the facility at risk of exposing staff and other residents to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP), policy, dated 03/28/2024 documented The purpose of this policy is to outline the guidelines for implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in order to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) within our facility. EBP will be utilized in conjunction with standard precautions to provide targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities.Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation after hospitalization. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) assessment, dated 09/26/2025, indicated Resident 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 3 of 4 sampled residents (44, 32, & 83) reviewed for smoking, position/mobility, and anticoagulants (often called a blood thinner, a medication that inhibits blood clotting). This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Smoking> Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a lung disease blocking the airflow, making it difficult to breathe). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/09/2025, documented Resident 44 was alert and oriented. Facility policy, entitled Smoking Prohibited, dated 10/01/2021, documented: Evaluation of resident for ability to safely smoke without staff assistance / supervision in a location out of the facility and off the facility grounds. Evaluation will be maintained in the resident's record and the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4) Resident 220 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission note, dated 05/22/2025 at 3:08 PM, showed Resident 220 was alert and oriented. Resident 220's admission care plan dated 05/29/2025 documented: SKIN IMPAIRMENT UPON ADMISSION/readmission - The resident has an area of impaired skin integrity. Left hip abrasion Left vascular wound to toes Left lower extremity vascular wound Left heel diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) stage 3 Right heel DFU unstageable Left lateral DFU unstageable. Resident 220's physician orders, dated 05/29/205, documented: Left hip abrasion clean with normal saline, pat dry, apply medihoney [wound treatment], and skin prep [skin protectant]. Cover with foam dressing. Change every other day until resolved. On 06/03/2025 at 11:43 AM, Resident 220 was observed sitting in his wheelchair with therapeutic cushion in place. He had bandages with kerlix wraps (gauze wrapping) covering both lower extremities. He informed me he was admitted with wounds to his heels. He said he also had a wound to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed and provided consent before administering a psychotropic medication (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behaviors) for 1 of 5 sampled residents (56) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents and/or resident representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/25/2025, documented Resident 56 was severely cognitively impaired, had multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), depression (a mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness and loss of interest) and was taking an antipsychotic (a class of psychotropic medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were conveyed to the resident's representative and/or to the state office of financial recovery (OFR) within 30 days of death or discharge for 1 of 1 discharged resident (311) reviewed for Trust Funds. This failure placed residents and/or their representatives at risk for delayed reconciliation of resident trust funds. Findings included . Review of Resident 311's Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/06/2024, showed resident 311 was discharged on 11/06/2024 with return anticipated. Resident 311's trust account statement showed Resident 311 had a balance of $1032.42 after a credit of $.45 on 01/02/2025, 57 days after discharge. Resident 311's trust account statement showed Resident 311 had a balance of $1135.62 after a credit of $103.20 on 01/08/2025, 63 days after discharge. Resident 311's trust account statement showed Resident 311 had a balance of $1135.97 after a credit of $.35 on 01/23/2025, 78 days after discharge. Resident 311's trust account statement showed, on 01/23/2025, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and/or maintain Advance Directives (AD) for 1 of 7 sampled residents (83) reviewed for AD. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged with return anticipated on 04/16/2025, and re-admitted on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/20/2025, documented Resident 83 was alert and oriented. The Social Service Initial Evaluation, dated 12/16/2024, showed in Section A.18., Resident 83 had a Health Care durable power of attorney (DPOA). A progress note, dated 01/15/2025, showed DPOA paperwork was supposed to be brought to the facility on [DATE]. The Social Services Quarterly Note, dated 03/06/2025, documented in section I. Advanced Directives, No change in status. Review of Resident 83's care plan did not document a Focus area addressing an AD. Review of Resident 83's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an evaluation assessment, consent, and/or physician's order for 2 of 2 sampled residents (56 & 86) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk of injury, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy entitled, Bed Rail Risk and Safety, revised 10/19/2022, documented: .Assess the Resident 1. Any resident being considered for using a bed with bed rail(s) is evaluated by the facility's interdisciplinary team to determine whether the resident's functional status and bed mobility is improved through the use of bed rail(s), to identify any bed rail that might constitute physical restraint, and to identify individual characteristics that may increase the risk of entrapment by bed rails or mattress . 3. If the resident's evaluation identifies him or her as appropriate for the use of bed rail(s), the following procedures will be followed: a. Educate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment accurately reflected mental health diagnoses for 2 of 6 sampled residents (409 & 410) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included . Review of facility policy, entitled Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Screening, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Policy, documented, 1) Prior to an individual's admission, The Social Worker, Admissions Coordinator, or designee will review the completed screening forms via e-PAS and obtain a copy for placement in the electronic medical record . 1) Resident 409 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and anxiety. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/30/2025, documented Resident 409 was alert and oriented. Record review of Resident 409's Level 1 PASRR, dated 05/26/2025, did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to document completion and/or refusal of weights for 1 of 3 residents (223) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk for unplanned weight loss and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/13/2025, showed Resident 223 was alert and oriented. Review of Resident 223's care plan showed no potential problems or goals related to nutrition or hydration were developed. Resident 223's electronic health record (EHR) showed the following weights: On 04/04/2025 admission weight showed 113.4 pounds On 04/06/2025 weight showed 111.0 pounds On 05/13/2025 weight showed 105.8 pounds On 06/05/2025 weight showed 104.6 pounds On 06/06/2025 at 9:14 AM, Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant, said when residents were admitted they were weighed every day for four days, and then every week unless otherwise directed. Weights were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs, biologicals, and medical equipment were dated upon opening and discarded once expired for one of two medications rooms (2nd floor) and one of two treatment carts (1st floor) reviewed for medication and equipment storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication and receiving treatment with outdated equipment. Findings included . <Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER]nd Floor> On [DATE] at 10:35 AM, a concurrent observation with Staff C, Unit Manager and Licensed Practical Nurse, showed as follows: 1. Medication Storage Room Refrigerator: One Vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative PPD (a solution used to test for tuberculosis) was observed opened with no date for when it was opened for use, and no date for when it should be disposed of. Two boxes of Bisacodyl Suppositories (rectal suppositories used to relieve constipation) with expiration date of [DATE]. 2. Medication Storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transfer training was provided to family resulting in an unsafe discharge for 1 of 3 sample residents (1) reviewed for discharge process. This failure placed residents at risk for an unsafe discharge into the community and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitative services. The 5-day Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 02/29/2025, indicated that Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance from staff for transfers. Review of the hospital Physical Therapy (PT) note, dated 02/22/2025, indicated that Resident 1 was independent with all mobility using a 4 wheeled walker prior to hospitalization. On 04/29/2025 at 12:15 PM, Staff D, Social Services Director, said that the last covered day for stay depends on insurance. Staff D said that the insurance case manager decides when the resident no longer qualifies for therapy services. Staff D was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that advance directives were implemented on admission for 1 of 7 (1) residents reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed residents at risk for not having advanced directives honored and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Corporate entity policy/document titled, Advance Directives, dated [DATE], showed, upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. In addition, facility staff will verify the residents' wishes with regard to urgent or emergency care, including the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Washington State requires the facility to use CPR with nursing home residents unless the resident's guidelines state 'No CPR. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehab services. The 5-day Minimum data set assessment, dated [DATE], indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish a wound plan of care for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/30/2024, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and had a Stage II pressure ulcer (an open wound on the skin caused by prolonged pressure to a specific area of the body) upon admission. An admission note, dated 12/28/2024, documented, New admission from [local hospital] . Stage 2 pressure injury to sacrum [lower back above the buttocks] . Resident resting in bed. Resident 1's comprehensive care plan, dated 12/28/2024, did not have documentation of wound plan of care for the resident's pressure ulcer. On 01/13/2025 at 2:57 PM, Staff C, Assistant Director of Nursing Services and Registered Nurse (RN), said Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and/or maintain Advance Directives (AD) for 1 of 11 sampled residents (157) reviewed for AD. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . Resident 157 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Admission/Medicare - 5 day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 08/15/2024, documented Resident 157 was alert and oriented. Record review of Resident 157's Social Service Initial Evaluation, dated 08/12/2024, documented, 18a .POA [Power of Attorney] is [Proper Name]. Record review of Resident 157's Multidisciplinary Care Conference, dated 08/12/2024, documented, K.1 . Son is POA. Record review of Resident 157's Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not show AD paperwork documentation, or that AD documents were requested. On 08/22/2024 at 2:01 PM, Staff C, Director of Social Services, said when a resident was admitted , if they had an AD or Power of Attorney,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (42) reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. This failure placed residents and/or their representatives at risk for not having adequate information to make financial decisions related to the residents' stay in the facility. Findings included . The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, dated 04/10/2024, documented Resident 42's representative was contacted on 04/09/2024 and informed Resident 42's services were ending on 04/11/2024. The SNF ABN was not provided to inform the representative of the potential financial liability. On 08/23/2024 at 11:25 AM, Staff N, Business Office Manager, said the SNF ABN for Resident 42 was not completed. At 11:40 AM, Staff C, Social Services Director, said she had a conversation with Staff N and she was not sure who was supposed to cover the SNF ABN with residents or their representatives. Staff C said Resident 42 should have had the SNF ABN because he remained in the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written Bed-Hold notice to the resident or resident's representative at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 1 sampled resident (105) reviewed for bed hold notification. This failure placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Resident 105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 06/14/2024, documented Resident 105 was moderately cognitively impaired. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 105 was hospitalized on [DATE]. The EHR did not show documentation of a written Bed-Hold notice, nor that contact was made to the resident or resident's representative regarding a Bed-Hold. On 08/22/2024 at 10:06 AM, Staff E, Admissions Liaison, said when a resident was transferred to the hospital, admissions contacted the resident or the resident representative and offered a bed-hold. Staff E said she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed accurately to reflect a resident's condition at the time of assessment for 1 of 27 sampled residents (75) reviewed for assessment accuracy. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of strokes (when the brain's blood supply is cut off, which can damage or kill brain tissue). The MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident was alert and oriented and was able to make care needs known. The MDS did not reflect the resident's visual deficit. On 08/08/09/2024 at 2:47 PM, Resident 75 stated, Strokes have taken a big chunk of my vision. It is very difficult for me to see. It is difficult to read the activity calendar and get into the bathroom. Resident 75 said she needed assistance with most Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to her poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the recommendations of the Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II for 1 of 7 sampled residents (14) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (chronic, long-term brain disorder that affects the nervous system and causes involuntary movements) and Depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/07/2024, indicated Resident 14 experienced hallucinate and experience delusions, and was severely cognitively impaired. The PASARR, dated 06/25/2024, indicated Level II services were appropriate for new behaviors of a psychotic disorder. The Notice of Determination, dated 07/16/2024, documented Resident 14 had been identified as having a mental health condition that required specialized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment was completed correctly for 2 of 9 sampled residents (38 & 100) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the necessary mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression. The admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/22/2024, indicated Resident 38 was alert and oriented. The PASARR, dated 07/12/2024, indicated Resident 38 had a Mood Disorder. The recommendation was No Level II evaluation indicated at this time due to exempted hospital discharge: Level II must be completed if scheduled discharge does not occur. On 08/21/2024 at 2:20 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said they should review the PASARR for accuracy for new admits. Staff A said she did not understand the exemption issue and would reach out to the PASARR. At 3:17 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated to reflect changing needs for 1 of 27 sampled residents (67) reviewed for care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of care. Findings included . Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including falls with a fracture of one rib right side, fracture of T5-T6 vertebra, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate, caused by damage to the parts of the brain that control language) and Dementia. The 5- day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/07/2024, documented Resident 76 was moderately cognitively impaired and required moderate assistance with toileting. The MDS showed the resident was at risk of injury from falls due to new admission and deconditioning with resulting lack of balance and endurance; and Resident 67 had an indwelling foley catheter (a thin,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure toilet assistance was provided consistently, in accordance with the resident's preferences and current abilities for 1 of 6 sampled residents (67) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) for dependent residents. This failure placed residents at risk for embarrassment, poor hygiene, potential falls, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including falls and Aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate, caused by damage to the parts of the brain that control language). The 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment, dated 08/07/2024, documented Resident 67 had moderate cognitive impairment, was able to make care needs known and required moderate assistance with toileting. The MDS documented Resident 67 was at risk of injury from falls due to new admission and deconditioning with resulting lack of balance and endurance;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to maintain residents' abilities in range of motion and activities of daily living, and provide preventative range of motion (ROM) services for 4 of 5 sampled residents (64, 82,15 & 67) reviewed ROM services. This failure placed residents at risk for an avoidable decline and diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left non-dominant side (Partial paralysis on one side of the body). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/31/2024, showed Resident 64 was severely cognitively impaired, and no restorative therapy services were completed. The care plan, dated 01/06/2024, indicated resident required extensive assistance x2 for bed mobility, and repositioning. No restorative services was noted in the care plan. On 08/20/2024 at 10:00 AM, Resident 64 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility administered Tuberculin (TB) Solution to a resident allergic to the TB solution for 1 of 5 sampled residents (100) reviewed for Tuberculin testing. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5-Day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 08/08/2024, indicated Resident 100 was severely cognitively impaired. The local hospital H&P (history & physical) Note, dated 07/26/2024, indicated Resident 100 had an allergy to Tuberculin. A progress note, dated 08/03/2024 at 7:19 PM, documented, chest x-ray done r/t (related to) unable to take the TB solution, results came back negative . The August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Resident 100 was administered the first step Tuberculin on 08/08/2024. The MAR documented Resident 100 was administered the second step on 08/16/2024. On 08/22/2024 at 2:54 PM, Staff O, Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure medication was secured in 1 of 4 medication carts (100 hall medication cart) reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed resident at risk for medications being accessible to unauthorized staff and residents. Findings included . On 08/22/2024 at 9:08 AM, Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse, was observed standing near the 100 hall medication cart. When asked if they were available to be observed for medication administration, Staff K said they had completed their morning medication pass. Staff K went into room [ROOM NUMBER] and was speaking to the resident in bed one. A medication cup with clear yellow liquid was observed on the 100 medication cart when Staff K walked away. At 9:12 AM, Staff K came out of room [ROOM NUMBER] and proceeded to answer the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]. She returned to the medication cart and then walked back into room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 9:14 AM, Staff K walked back to the medication cart and discarded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure patient care equipment was maintained in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 suction machines (2nd Floor Crash Cart Suction Machine) reviewed for equipment in safe operating condition. This failure placed residents at risk for not having their care needs met. Findings included . On 08/20/2024 at 12:18 PM, while reviewing the 2nd Floor crash cart, Staff L, Licensed Practical Nurse, said the crash cart was checked every night shift. Staff L was asked to turn on the suction machine on the crash cart. When the suction machine was turned on, the suction machine had no suction to it. When asked what the sign off forms on the cart were for, Staff L said they were not sure what the staff were checking, and the crash cart was checked by the night shift nurse every evening. At 12:24 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services and Registered Nurse (RN), said staff checked the crash cart every night. At 3:20 PM, Staff M, RN, said the suction machine on the crash cart was used to clear a resident's airway in the event they have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consents for wanderguards, a device used for residents at-risk of elopement, were in place for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1 & 2) reviewed for informed consents regarding wanderguards. This failure placed residents and resident representatives at risk of inadequate knowledge of wanderguard use, decreased freedom of movement, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/13/2024, documented the resident was cognitively intact and did not exhibit wandering behavior during the lookback period. A physician's order, dated 03/15/2024 and discontinued 03/19/2024, documented, Check placement of wander bracelet every shift. A review of Resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR) did not show an informed consent was completed for the wanderguard. On 04/08/2024 at 2:44 PM, Resident 1 said after her hospital stay she would walk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wanderguard, a device used for residents at-risk of elopement, assessments were completed and in place for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2 & 3) reviewed for accident hazards related to wanderguards. This failure placed residents at risk of improper wanderguard use, decreased freedom of movement, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/13/2024, documented the resident was cognitively intact and did not exhibit wandering behavior during the lookback period. A physician's order, dated 03/15/2024 and discontinued 03/19/2024, documented, Check placement of wander bracelet every shift. A resident safety evaluation, dated 03/07/2024, documented, Not at risk for elopement at this time. No other safety evaluations were found in Resident 1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record). On 04/08/2024 at 2:44 PM, Resident 1 said after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were able to give an informed consent before psychotropic medications (mind altering) administration for 2 of 5 sampled residents (34 & 79) reviewed for right to be informed and make decisions about treatment. This failure placed residents and/or resident representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The 5-Day/admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/21/2023, documented Resident 34 was severely cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 08/16/2023, documented Resident 34 was prescribed Citalopram (an antidepressant). Resident 34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) did not show documentation of an informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided scheduled bathing/showering opportunities for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 34) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5-Day/admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 08/21/2023, documented Resident 34 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with ADLs, and Wednesdays and Saturdays were the resident's scheduled bathing/shower days during dayshift. Resident 34's bathing/showering record, dated 08/06/2023 to 09/06/2023, documented no bathing activity was documented from 08/19/2023 until 09/03/2023, for 16 days. Resident 34's Shower record, dated 08/06/2023 to 09/06/2023, documented no bathing activity was documented from 08/19/2023 until 09/02/2023, for 15 days. On 09/07/2023 at 3:11 PM, Staff K, Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure compression socks were applied per physician orders and failed to obtain resident weights per physician orders for 2 of 5 sampled residents (82 & 33) reviewed for quality of care related to following physician orders. This failure placed residents at risk of poor circulation, weight loss, unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 33 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/21/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician order, dated 08/25/2023, documented, Weight MWF [Monday, Wednesday, Friday] every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri for monitoring. Resident 33's electronic medical record, dated 08/25/2023 to 09/06/2023, documented two weights were obtained out of five opportunities. No weights were documented after 08/30/2023. A progress note, dated 09/06/2023, documented, Pt [patient] left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify weight loss for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 34) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, inadequate nutrition, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a femur (long bone of leg) fracture and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). The 5-Day/admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 08/21/2023, documented Resident 34 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living including eating, was not on a documented weight loss program and was not on a diuretic medication during the review period. A Medical Nutrition Therapy Follow-Up Note, dated 08/14/2023, documented Resident 34 weighed 141.5 lbs upon discharge from the hospital. A Registered Nurse and Medical Doctor Note, dated 08/14/2023, documented upon discharge Resident 34 weighed 144.2 lbs. on 08/14/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting the mind) medications by failing to monitor for medication side effects and target behaviors for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 34) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The 5-Day/admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 08/21/2023, documented Resident 34 was severely cognitively impaired. A Physician's order, dated 08/16/2023, documented Resident 34 was prescribed Citalopram (an antidepressant). Resident 34's Depression Care Plan, revised 08/25/2023, documented the intervention to administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently maintain the medication refrigerator temperature log in 1 of 2 sampled medication rooms (1st floor) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications with unknown potency. Findings included . On 09/07/2023 at 6:05 PM, the medication rooms on the first floor were observed. In the IV (intravenous) medication room, there was a fridge used to store medications including vaccines. The Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log was reviewed and showed the following: --The July 2023 Log showed the refrigerator temperature was not documented 22 of 31 AM (morning) checks. --The August 2023 Log showed the refrigerator temperature was not documented 18 of 31 AM checks. --The September 2023 Log showed the refrigerator temperature was not documented 4 of 7 AM checks. On 09/07/2023 at 6:18 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said fridge temperatures should be obtained twice a day if vaccines were stored in the refrigerator. After reviewing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$7,443 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-09-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 51.8+2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.7+1.3 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Birch Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationTacoma, WA 1 of 5Bluestone Health And RehabilitationBluefield, WV 1 of 5Brookside Rehab & Nursing CenterWarrenton, VA 1 of 5Carlin Springs Health & RehabilitationArlington, VA 1 of 5Cortland Acres Health and RehabilitationThomas, WV 1 of 5Fair Oaks Health & RehabilitationFairfax, VA 1 of 5Forest Hill Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Glenville Health & RehabGlenville, WV 1 of 5Guggenheimer Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Highland Ridge Rehab CenterDublin, VA 1 of 5Holly Manor Rehab And NursingFarmville, VA 1 of 5Lawrenceville Health & RehabilitationLawrenceville, VA 1 of 5Mountain View Care CenterRipley, WV 1 of 5New Martinsville Health & RehabNew Martinsville, WV 1 of 5Oakhurst Health & RehabilitationFork Union, VA 1 of 5Oakwood SNF LLCMiddle River, MD 1 of 5Rosedale Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Shalom Gardens Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 1 of 5Spokane Health & RehabilitationSpokane, WA 1 of 5The McKendree Post Acute & RehabilitationHermitage, TN 1 of 5Winchester Health & RehabilitationWinchester, VA 1 of 5Woodard Creek Health & RehabilitationOlympia, WA 2 of 5Alderwood Post Acute & RehabilitationLynnwood, WA 2 of 5Evergreen Health And Rehabilitation CenterWinchester, VA 2 of 5Fairmont Crossing Health And Rehab CenterAmherst, VA 2 of 5Gig Harbor Health And RehabilitationGig Harbor, WA 2 of 5Huntington Health And Rehabilitation CenterHuntington, WV 2 of 5Lakeside Health & RehabilitationRichmond, VA 2 of 5Laurelhurst Post Acute & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Lynn Care CenterFront Royal, VA 2 of 5Mt. Tabor Health & RehabilitationPortland, OR 2 of 5Oakwood Health And Rehab CenterBedford, VA 2 of 5Staunton Post Acute & RehabilitationStaunton, VA 2 of 5The Broadview CenterSeattle, WA 3 of 5George Washington Health & RehabilitationAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Salmon Creek Post Acute & RehabilitationVancouver, WA 3 of 5Skyview Springs Rehab And Nursing CenterLuray, VA 3 of 5Summit Health And Rehab CenterLynchburg, VA 3 of 5Tygart Valley Health & RehabilitationBelington, WV 3 of 5Williamsburg Post Acute & RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WASH 6 SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/08/2023
IDELS, SHIMONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
SCHWARTZ, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
LACEY SNF OPERATIONS MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 14%Other / private 23%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$392per resident / day
operating cost
$11,927per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$421per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505525. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next