No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sierra View Care Center

14318 Ohio Street, Baldwin Park, CA 91706 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (626) 960-1971 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 960-1971 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
4318 Maine Ave · (626) 962-5141 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4318 Maine Ave Ste C · (626) 851-8108 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4724 Maine Ave · (626) 337-3095 · Call to confirm hours
Park
BALDWIN PARK BLVD · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.6%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.3%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.1%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.1%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.702.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.021.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
92.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 92.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.8%CMS range 25.2–43.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.8–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge92.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge96.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.6%CMS range 5.9–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.411.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.53
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
19.3%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-24)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two of two sampled residents (Residents 5 and 12) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Call lights: Accessibility and Timely Response. These failures had the potential for Residents 5 and 12 not to receive necessary care and services in a timely manner and placed the residents at risk for falls/injury Findings: a. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 5 on 10/30/2025 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified glaucoma (condition that causes damage to the eye's optic nerve [carries electrical impulses from the eye to the brain, which converts the impulses into the things seen]) and myopathy (disorder that directly affects skeletal muscle tissue, causing primary muscle weakness, cramping, or stiffness). During a review of Resident 5's Fall Risk Assessment (FRA- method of assessing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement specific, comprehensive, and individualized person-centered care plans to meet the residents' needs for three of three sampled residents (Residents 13, 100 and 42) by failing to: a. Accurately identify specific activity intervention for Resident 13.b.1 and b.2. Identify and implement specific CP interventions that reflect Resident 100's actual and specific needs.c. Develop an individualized care plan to address scaling and stiffness of Resident 42's bilateral lower extremities (BLE) after application of A&D ointment on 3/18/2026. These failures resulted in the residents not receiving individualized care to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 13 on 1/23/2016 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including blindness, bipolar disorder (mood swings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for residents with indwelling catheter (including suprapubic catheter [a thin, flexible tube inserted through a small abdominal incision into the bladder to drain urine], nephrostomy tube [a thin, flexible catheter inserted through the skin on the lower back into the kidney to drain urine], or a Foley catheter [a soft, flexible tube inserted through the urethra or abdominal wall into the bladder to continuously drain urine into an external bag] ) for two of three sampled residents (Residents 6 and 55) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 6's suprapubic catheter tubing was secured on Resident 6's thigh.b. Ensure Resident 55's Foley catheter tubing was secured on Resident 55's thigh. These failures placed Residents 6 and 55 at risk for infection and injury related to the use of indwelling catheter.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Provide necessary care and services for gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition/medication directly to the stomach) site as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the plan of care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 3).b. Elevate the resident's head of the bed (HOB) while receiving feeding formula through the GT in accordance with the resident's plan of care and physician's order for one of two sampled residents (Resident 65). These failures had the potential to result in complications related to tube feedings for Residents 53 and 65. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 3 on 6/4/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for attention to GT and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food storage practices in one of one facility kitchen, by failing to: a. Discard an open loaf of wheat bread beyond its use-by-date (the last date the food was considered safe to eat) of 4/20/2026 in the kitchen bread storage area. b. Discard an open plastic container of baking soda beyond its use-by-date of 4/15/2026 in the kitchen dry storage area. c. Discard an open pack of tortilla beyond its use-by-date of 4/19/2026 in the kitchen walk-in refrigerator. d. Discard a tray of grilled cheese sandwiches and pizzas beyond its use-by-date of 4/20/2026 in the kitchen walk-in refrigerator. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (illness caused by ingesting contaminated food or beverages) for the residents.Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 4/21/2026 at 8:26 AM, in the kitchen bread storage area, there was one open loaf of wheat bread beyond its use-by-date of 4/20/2026. The DS stated the kitchen staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for two of two sampled residents (Residents 11 and 100), the licensed nurse failed to timely document on the residents' medical record: a. Resident 11's respiratory assessment on 4/21/2026. b. Resident 100's ampicillin (medication to kill bacteria) administration on 4/22/2026. These deficient practices had the potential to result in lack of communication between staff and delay and interrupt the provision of care needed to maintain the residents' highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 11 on 4/24/2025 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), asthma (a condition where the airways got swollen and made it hard for the resident to breathe) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow infection prevention procedures to prevent the transmission of infectious organisms for two of three sampled residents (Residents 100 and 101) by failing to: a. Ensure the licensed nurse accurately label Resident 100's midline dressing (a clean cover that protected the midline [small tube in a vein that gave fluids or medicine] site) on 4/21/2026. b. Ensure Resident 101's Care Giver 1 (CG1) wore the required personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) while providing care to Resident 101 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- extra safety steps using gown and gloves to stop germs from spreading during close care of the resident). These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for Residents 100 and 101. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 100's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the identifiable health information (any information that could be used to identify the individual, such as the full name, date of birth , etc.) on the ampicillin (medication to kill germ) intravenous (IV- medicine or fluid that went straight into a vein) bag to be exposed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 100). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unauthorized disclosure of Resident 100's personal information to unauthorized users resulting in breach of privacy.Findings: During a review of Resident 100's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 100 on 4/18/2026 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow) and bacteremia (germs got into the blood). During a review of Resident 100's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/20/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 100 had the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 100's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 4/22/2026, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Dietary recommendation by the facility's Registered Dietician was acted upon for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Nutritional and Dietary Supplements This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse consequences for Resident 3. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 3 on 6/4/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia (high level of fats in the blood), anemia (decrease in the total amount of red blood cells in the blood) and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 2/24/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 3 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for a resident on oxygen therapy (treatment that provides supplemental, or extra oxygen) and breathing treatments (medicine delivered via nebulizer [device that turns liquid medicine into fine mist]) in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 22). This failure placed Resident 22 at risk of infections which could lead to respiratory complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 12/22/2025 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (ARF, respiratory system suddenly fails to exchange gas) with hypoxia (deficiency in the amount of oxygen reaching body tissues), heart failure (HF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump blood efficiently) and anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and apprehension). During a review of Resident 22's untitled Care Plan (CP) dated 12/22/2025, the CP indicated Resident 22 was on oxygen therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) had a safe and clutter-free room environment when:1. Resident 4's room was full of clutter on top of and alongside Resident 4's bed.2. Multiple packs of cigarettes were inside Resident 4's bedside drawer.3. Resident 4 had medications at the bedside without a physician's order and without locked storage for medications at the bedside.This failure placed Resident 4 at risk for danger of falls and injuries, and risk of fire with a cluttered area of flammable materials (ability to ignite easily and burn rapidly) on top of and alongside Resident 4's bed. This failure also had the potential for Resident 4 and other residents to have an unmonitored adverse reaction to medications.During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bilateral spinal stenosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was assessed for readmission to the first available bed in a semi-private room after Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on 7/22/2025, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, readmission to Facility, when the facility failed to request Resident 1's updated information and referral from GACH 1 on 7/31/2025 after GACH 1 contacted the facility regarding Resident 1's readmission to the facility. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 remaining in GACH 1 from 7/31/2025 through 8/6/2025 following an inquiry from GACH 1 for Resident 1 to be transferred back to the facility.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 7/22/2025 without diagnosis information. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 8/1/2025, the OSR indicated there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy on Advance Directives (AD, written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 17, 28 and 31) by failing to: 1. Ensure Residents 28 and 31's Advance Directive Acknowledgement Form (ADA) was filled out. 2. Ensure a copy of Resident 17's AD was in the medical chart. These failures had the potential for Residents 17, 28 and 31's preferences not carried out by the facility staff, affecting the residents quality of life. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 31's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and lower back pain. During a review of Resident 31's History and Physical (H&P, formal document of a medical provider's examination of a patient)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a specific and individualized person-centered care plan to meet the needs of trauma (a psychological and physiological response to an overwhelming, distressing, or life-threatening event or series of events) survivor residents for two of two sampled residents (Residents 17 and 54). These failures had the potential for Residents 17 and 54 not to receive the necessary care, treatment, and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing traumatic event). During a review of Resident 17's Trauma Informed Care Screener (TICS, a tool or process that helps identify if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure for infection control and prevention for three of five sampled residents (Residents 10, 59, and 74), by failing to: a. Ensure Staff wore the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- minimizes exposure to hazards) while providing care five residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms) while providing care to Resident 74. b. Ensure an appropriate signage indicating Resident 59's transmission-based precaution (TBP, set of infection control guidelines used in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of infectious diseases than can be transmitted through contact with an infected person) was posted outside the resident's room. c. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 4 (CNA 4) wore the required PPE when changing Resident 10's linen. These deficient practices had the potential to result in cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Informed Consent, for the use of wander guard alarm (a system of wearable bracelets and sensors that helps keep residents safe in healthcare facilities) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 59). This failure violated Resident 59's right and placed Resident 59 at risk for psychological distress related to the discomfort from wearing the alarm and the sound of the alarm. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and vitamin D), unsteadiness (pattern of walking that's unstable) on feet, and anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). During a review of Resident 59's Elopement Risk (ER), dated 12/22/2024, the ER indicated Resident 59 was at risk for elopement. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for one of one sampled resident (Resident 89). This failure had the potential for Resident 89 not to received necessary care and services and put Resident 89 at risk for fall. Findings: During a review of Resident 89's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss on interest or pleasure in activities) and unsteadiness on feet (gait instability). During a review of Resident 89's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 2/4/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 89 had a severely impaired cognition (ability to understand and process information). The MDS indicated Resident 89 required supervision or touching assistance (helper provided verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 5) that were in the facility for more than 30 days. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for delayed care and to not receive care and services for a mental or intellectual disability. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted Resident 5 to the facility on 1/27/25 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of esophagus (cancer of the tube that runs from the throat to the stomach) and bipolar disorder (episodes of mood swings from depressive lows to manic highs). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 2/3/25, the MDS indicated Resident 5 was severely cognitively impaired (ability to understand and process thoughts), and was totally dependent in lower body dressing and personal and toileting hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan (CP) for the use of Zoloft (medication used to treat depression [persistent feelings of sadness and worthlessness and a lack of desire to engage in formerly pleasurable activities]) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 41). This failure had the potential for inconsistency of care for Resident 41 and risk for unnecessary psychotropic medication use. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 41's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/2/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 41 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 41's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 10/24/2024, the OSR indicated Resident 41 had an active order for Zoloft 50 milligrams (mg, unit of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident with management for constipation for five days (2/15/25, 2/16/25, 2/17/25, 2/18/25, 2/19/25) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 142). This failure resulted in a delay in receiving necessary care & services to manage Resident 142 constipation and had the potential to result in adverse consequences for Resident 142. Findings: During a review of Resident 142's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/1/24 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included othopedic aftercare following surgical amputation (care provided following a medical procedure that involves removal of a body part) and obesity (excessive accumulation of body fat). During a review of Resident 142's History & Physical (H&P) dated 2/16/25, the H&P indicated Resident 142 had the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 142's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 2/18/25, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy on foley catheter (FC, thin flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 50) by failing to ensure the FC port was changed when visibly soiled and ensure a FC securement device was placed as ordered. These failures had the potential to put Resident 50 at risk for infection and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, medical condition which the prostate grows making it difficult to urinate) and sepsis( life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection injures its own tissues and organs). During a review of Resident 50's History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/11/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 50 did not have the capacity to understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 16) who was receiving tube feeding (TF, liquid form of nutrients given to people who cannot eat or drink by mouth safely) through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach, can be used to give nutrition and/or drugs), did not have the TF running while the resident was being changed in the supine (lying horizontally on the back with face and torso upward) position. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 16 aspirating (when small particles of food or drops of liquid are breathed into the lungs), which could cause aspiration pneumonia (an infection that occurs in the lungs due to aspiration) and other serious complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 16 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 22) had pharmacy recommendations that were signed and dated by the attending physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in necessary services, poor continuity of care, and a delay in follow-up on the resident's status. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 22 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 22's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/12/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 22 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information on the Nurse Staffing Sheet (posted information that contains the facility's current resident census and total number and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff) was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for one of two nursing stations. This failure resulted in nurse staffing information being inaccessible to other residents at the opposite side of the facility. Findings: During observations on 2/18/2025 at 9:10 am, 2/19/2025 at 11:15 am, and 2/20/2025 at 10:30 am, the Nurse Staffing Sheet was only posted at the reception desk near the entrance in the facility across from Nursing Station A. During an interview on 2/20/2025 at 11:30 am with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated staffing was only posted in the reception area and there were no other postings within the facility. The DSD stated, the posting was accessible to visitors and residents who visited the front lobby, but wasn't readily accessible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the informed consent was signed for the use of Trazodone 50 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) every night for insomnia (difficulty falling asleep) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 31). This failure had the potential for unnecessary psychotropic medication (drug affecting how the brain works and causes changes in mood, feelings and behavior) for Resident 31. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome (persistent pain that lasts for at least three months and significantly impacts a person's life) and low back pain. During a review of Resident 31's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/18/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 31 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 31's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 12/10/2024, the OSR indicated Resident 31 had an active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse (willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). Resident 1 was hit by Family Member 1 (FM1- Resident 1's brother) during visitation on 5/21/24. This deficient practice resulted in discoloration of Resident 1's right lower lip and left temporal (side) area of the face. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/22/24 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and bipolar disorder (mental disorder with periods of depression [persistent feelings of sadness and worthlessness and a lack of desire to engage in formerly pleasurable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain written informed consent for three of five sampled residents (Residents 81, 85 and 5) for the use of psychotropic (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) medication. These deficient practices had a potential for Residents 81, 85 and 5 to not receive adequate information regarding the use of psychotropic medication, necessary to make an informed decision. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 81's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 81 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive chronic kidney disease (high blood pressure caused by damaged kidneys), dementia (progressive impaired ability to think, remember or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), major depressive disorder or depression (a persistent sadness and loss of interest in activities that interferes with daily life) and psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to assist resident's activities of daily living for three of three sampled residents (Residents 18, 48 and 49) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 18 was provided a communication device with the language that the resident understood. b. Ensure Resident 48 was provided a communication device with the language that the resident understood. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 18 and 48 to not be able to express their needs and receive the necessary care and services. c. Assist Resident 49 who required assistance, encouragement and cueing with eating, during mealtime, in accordance with facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a decline in Resident 49's activities of daily living, including the ability to eat which could lead to weight loss. Findings: a. During a review of the Resident 18's admission record, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and services to two of two sampled residents (Residents 239 and 73) that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychological needs, when the facility failed to: a. Address Resident 239's edema of the left leg by elevating the leg or provided measures to elevate the affected leg. b. Address elevated blood glucose levels for Resident 73. These deficient practices had the potential to result in negative outcome to Residents 239 and 73, affecting the residents' quality of life. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 239's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/26/2022 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder that affects the blood vessels outside of the heart) and venous insufficiency (when the veins have trouble sending blood from the limbs back to the heart, causing blood to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress (LAL, a bed that alternates pressure to help heal and prevent pressure injuries) was set accurately for two of three sampled residents (Residents 84 and 11) reviewed for pressure ulcers (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue when an area of skin is placed under pressure). This failure had the potential for Resident 84's and Resident 11's skin conditions to worsen or develop further skin breakdown. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 84's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 84 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included necrotizing fasciitis (a bacterial infection that cause skin, tissue and muscle death), type II diabetes (DM2- a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as fuel) with skin ulcer (an open sore caused by poor blood flow) and methicillin resistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the bed was at the lowest position for two of six sampled residents (Residents 39 and 69) who were assessed as high risk for falls. This deficient practice had the potential to result in injury secondary to falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/17/2018, with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body.) During a review of Resident 39's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], the assessment indicated the resident was at risk for falls due to intermittent confusion, required assistance with elimination, poor vision, balance problem while standing and required the use of assistive devices. During a review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing side (bed) rail for two of six sampled residents (Residents 65 and 85). 2. Follow the physician's order for bilateral (on both sides) side rails with length to be at one quarter (rails at the head of the bed that are less restrictive for movement) use as an enabler (bedrails used to aid movement) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 78). These deficient practices had the potential to present a safety hazard and risk of entrapment to Residents 65, 85 and 78. Findings: 1.a. During a review of Resident 65's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/5/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy (brain disorder in which a person has repeated seizures [convulsions] over time. During a review of Resident 65's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 1/26/2024, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Residents 140 and 241) reviewed for the use of antibiotics (medication to treat infection), received the medication with adequate indication for its use. a. Resident 140 did not meet the criteria to receive Cefazolin (an antibiotic medication) intravenously (IV, a way of giving a drug or other substance through a needle or tube inserted into a vein), which started on 2/6/2024, and Maxipime (Cefepime HCl, an antibiotic medication) intravenously, which started on 2/13/2024 for Resident 140's right forearm cellulitis (skin infection) in accordance with the facility's antibiotic stewardship program (a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use). b. For Resident 241, the medication criteria was not met for the use of fluconazole (medication to treat and prevent fungal infection) as treatment of Methicillin Resistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two bags of meat in a plastic box were not placed directly on the floor in the kitchen preparation area in accordance with facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P), titled Food Storage. This deficient practice had the potential for food borne illnesses (infections caused by ingesting contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 2/13/2024 at 8:32 am, together with the facility's Assistant Director of Nutrition Services (ADNS), two bags of meat in a plastic box were placed directly on the floor in the meal preparation area. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/13/2024 at 8:32 am, the ADNS stated, food and food containers should not be placed directly on the floor. ADNS stated, the floor was dirty and putting food directly on the flow can cause food contamination and sickness if eaten by the residents. The ADNS stated food or food containers needed to be placed on a rack. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/13/2024 at 8:34 am, with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wear required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses.) when assisting two of three residents (Resident 33 and Resident 240) with meal. These deficient practices had the potential for the spread of infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/25/2023 with diagnoses that included multiple fracture (broken bone) of ribs. During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 11/16/2023, the MDS indicated the resident had moderate cognitive (ability to understand) impairment and required supervision with rolling left and right and sit to lying mobility. During a review of Resident 240's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/6/2024 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced the resident's dignity and respect, by standing in front of the resident while assisting a meal for one of one sampled resident (Resident 49) in accordance with facility's policy on Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During Mealtimes. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 49's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 49 on 5/25/2018 with diagnoses that included cataract (clouding of the lens in the eye leading to a decrease in vision) and hypertensive retinopathy (damage of retinas [inner back lining of your eyes] from long-term high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 49's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/31/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 49 did not have the capacity to understand and make decision. During a review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety during self-administration of medications for one of one sampled resident (Resident 19.) This deficient practice had the potential to result in unsafe medication use. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/28/2022, with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar,) and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning.) During a review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 2/1/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had moderate cognitive (ability to understand) impairment. The MDS indicated the resident required moderate assistance (helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort) with rolling left and right and dependent with toileting and showers. During an observation in Resident 19's room and interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 83) who was at risk for fall, by failing to ensure the resident's call light was within reach as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure, titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response and the resident's care plan. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 83 not to receive or received delayed care. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 83 on 10/24/2023 with diagnoses that included epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsions, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain). During a review of Resident 83's untitled care plan initiated on 10/25/2023, the care plan indicated Resident 83 was at risk for falls and injuries. The care plan interventions indicated for nursing staff to place Resident 83's call light within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 239) with edema (swelling caused by fluid retention) of the left leg. This deficient practice had the potential to result in worsening of edema for Resident 239. Cross Reference: F684 Findings: During a review of Resident 239's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/26/2022 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder that affects the blood vessels outside of the heart) and venous insufficiency (when the veins have trouble sending blood from the limbs back to the heart, causing blood to pool in the veins on the legs.) During a review of Resident 239's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 1/8/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive (ability to understand) impairment. Resident 239 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to set up the lunch tray for one of one sampled resident (Resident 44) with severely impaired vision. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 44 losing weight and becoming dehydrated (when the body does not have enough fluid to function properly) due to the inability to feed himself. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 44 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (when the body's metabolism causes brain dysfunction), blindness in one eye, low vision in the other eye, and glaucoma (a group of eye conditions that cause blindness). During a review of Resident 44's Care Plan, revised on 10/7/2022, the care plan indicated Resident 44 had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to his conditions and required supervision by one staff member for eating. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula (tube which on one end splits into two prongs which are placed in the nostrils to deliver oxygen) was placed properly by placing both nasal prongs in the resident's nostrils for one of one sampled resident (Resident 83) in accordance with the facility's policy titled Oxygen Concentrator. This deficient practice placed Residents 83 at risk for shortness of breath and/or hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues). Findings: During a review of Resident 83's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 83 on 10/24/2023 with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (a condition in which not enough oxygen passes from the lungs into the blood) unspecified with hypoxia or hypercapnia (high levels of carbon dioxide [waste product that the body gets rid of when a person exhales]). During a review of Resident 83's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/2/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 83 did not have the capacity to understand and make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct reassessment after a routine pain medication was administered for one of two sampled residents (Resident 239.) This deficient practice resulted in Resident 239 to continue to experience pain, affecting the resident's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 239's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/25/2022 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder that affects the blood vessels outside of the heart) and venous insufficiency (when the veins have trouble sending blood from the limbs back to the heart, causing blood to pool in the veins on the legs.) During a review of Resident 239's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 1/8/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive (ability to understand) impairment. The MDS indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the irregularities of the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) identified by the facility's Pharmacy Consultant was acted upon for one of five sampled residents (Resident 83) in accordance with facility's policy and procedure titled, Consultant Pharmacist Reports. This deficient practice had the potential for harm due to missed opportunity by the physician and the licensed staff to act upon the reported irregularities. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 83 on 10/24/2023 with diagnoses that included epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsions, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain). During a review of Resident 83's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/2/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 83 did not have the capacity to understand and make decision. During a review of Resident 83's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 [LVN 3]) was aware to report an allegation of abuse to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (assist residents in long-term care facilities with issues related to day-to-day care) as required by State and Federal regulations. This deficient practice had the potential for facility staff not to report an abuse incident to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, which could lead to possible harm and risk of further abuse of the residents. Findings: During an interview on 2/15/2024 at 12:06 pm, with LVN 3 (Charge Nurse), LVN 3 stated, I don't know what is an Ombudsman when asked about reporting agencies if an abuse allegation occurred. LVN 3 stated the two agencies to report allegation of abuse were the State Agency and the local law enforcement. LVN 3 stated LVN 3 received abuse in-service training last month. During an interview on 2/15/2024 at 12:21 pm, with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated any allegation of abuse should be reported in a timely manner to the State,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure titled Confidentiality of Personal and Medical Records by ensuring one of one sampled resident (Resident 65) 's identifiable, personal and medical information were not exposed on the computer screen unattended and in view of unauthorized persons to view and access confidential information without the resident's consent or knowledge. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 65's violation of resident's right for privacy. Findings: During a review of Resident 65's admission record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 65 on 1/4/2024 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and hyperlipidemia (a condition of having high cholesterol in the blood). During a review of Resident 65's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/5/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 65 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decision. During a review of Resident 65's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLCAlameda, CA 1 of 5Crescent City Care CenterCrescent City, CA 1 of 5French Park Care CenterSanta Ana, CA 1 of 5North Valley Nursing CenterTujunga, CA 1 of 5Tarzana Health And Rehabilitation CenterTarzana, CA 2 of 5Blythe Post Acute LLCBlythe, CA 2 of 5College Vista Post-AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Cottage Crest Post AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Diamond Ridge Healthcare CenterPittsburg, CA 2 of 5Gordon Lane Care CenterFullerton, CA 2 of 5Heritage ManorMonterey Park, CA 2 of 5Spring Valley Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 2 of 5Sunny Hills Post AcuteLa Mirada, CA 2 of 5Torrey Pines Post Acute And RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Trabuco Hills Post AcuteLake Forest, CA 2 of 5Villa Del Sol Post AcuteBellflower, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Healthcare Center, LLCAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Bonita Hills Post AcuteLa Habra, CA 3 of 5Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterRiverside, CA 3 of 5Country Oaks Care CenterPomona, CA 3 of 5Courtyard Care CenterSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Extended Care Hospital Of RiversideRiverside, CA 3 of 5Knolls West Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 3 of 5Menifee Lakes Post AcuteSun City, CA 3 of 5Mission Carmichael Healthcare CenterCarmichael, CA 3 of 5Paramount Convalescent Hosp.Paramount, CA 3 of 5Pelican Ridge Post AcuteNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Sunset Manor Conv HospEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Vineland Post AcuteNorth Hollywood, CA 4 of 5Garden Park Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 4 of 5Las Vegas Post Acute & RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ocean View Post AcuteEscondido, CA 4 of 5Park Regency Care CenterLa Habra, CA 4 of 5Pomona Vista Care CenterPomona, CA 4 of 5Vista View Post AcuteVista, CA 5 of 5Alcott Rehabilitation HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Citrus Nursing CenterFontana, CA 5 of 5Del Mar Convalescent HospitalRosemead, CA 5 of 5Excell Health Care CenterOakland, CA 5 of 5Mission Care CenterRiverside, CA

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SIERRA VIEW CARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 10/30/2008
CASA/SIERRA CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES LPOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2025
JOHNSON, FRANKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/10/2008
DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICESOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/12/1989
FARRALES, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
KHEDIA, SANJAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025
KOCHEK, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
KWOK, WHITNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/27/2018
OXFORD, MICHEALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2022
PUNSALAN, MARIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/20/2015
CIBC BANK USAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 20%Other / private 12%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$381per resident / day
operating cost
$11,589per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$432per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056466. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next