No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vista View Post Acute

304 N. Melrose Dr, Vista, CA 92083 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (760) 724-8222 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (760) 724-8222 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
524 W Vista Way · (760) 758-1150 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
635 S Melrose Dr · (760) 643-3904 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
402 Olive Ave · (760) 726-0202 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(760) 639-1420 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
290 N Melrose Dr · (760) 724-7099

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.4%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.602.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.481.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 141 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.8%CMS range 47.2–62.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 9.4–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge74.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.5%CMS range 6.7–15.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.301.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
31.4%
Total nursing turnover
35.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 145.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-01)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2021-06-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2021-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 75) reviewed for abuse and neglect, was free from physical and verbal abuse and neglect when: 1. Certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 handled Resident 75 in a rough manner during incontinence (an inability to control the release of urine or feces) care. Furthermore, CNA 1 did not stop providing care when Resident 75 requested for her to stop. 2. CNA 1 told Resident 75, No one likes you here. You complain too much, and called the resident a racist. 3. CNA 1 did not clean Resident 75 after an incontinence episode as per the resident's request. As a result of these failures, Resident 75 experienced physical pain and was in fear of CNA 1. The day after the incident with CNA 1 (6/17/21), Resident 75 felt upset and stressed, lacked her usual appetite, was nauseous, and vomited. Findings: A review of Resident 75's admission Record dated 6/18/21, indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident rights for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) when vaccinations were administered to Resident 1 without his consent.This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience unwanted side effects from the vaccinations, and emotional distress from not having his rights/preferences honored.Findings:According to the admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a stroke) affecting right dominant side. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 was his own responsible party.During an interview with Resident 1 on 2/5/26 at 9:26 A.M., Resident 1 stated after he was admitted to the facility, he was given the Covid-19 and influenza vaccines via intramuscular injections (a shot which is given directly into the muscle). Resident 1 stated prior to his admission to the facility, he had never received the Covid-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safeguard the resident personal property for one of the two sampled residents (1). As a result, the resident credit card was missing, and a report of unauthorized purchases were charged from Resident 1's credit card.This failure had cause emotional and psychological stress to Resident 1 and may affect the client's trust relationship with the staff.On 7/16/25 at 10 A.M., an unannounced visit at the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint related to a suspicious activity charges on Resident 1's credit card. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (a condition in which bacteria invade and grow in the urinary tract), per the facility's admission Record.On 7/16/25, a review of the minimum data set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 4/25/25, indicated Resident 1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS - test the resident's cognition status) was 15 (13- 15 meant intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity was provided to one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) opened resident's drawer without permission and said inappropriate words towards Resident 2. This failure had the potential to make residents feel disrespected and may have resulted in diminished quality of life and lower self-esteem. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 2's minimum data set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 4/16/25, indicated, her brief interview for mental status (BIMS - test the resident's cognition status) was 15 (13- 15 meant intact cognition). On 5/28/25 at 12:31 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Social Services (DSS).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify and confirmed bed hold notice to the resident's family representative upon transfer to an acute care facility (hospital) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1' s family representative confusion related to bed hold payment. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 1's Bed Hold Notification Informed Consent Form was conducted. There was no indication of Resident 1's family representative was notified and confirmed the bed hold when Resident 1 was transferred to an acute hospital. On 5/28/25 at 1 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated nursing staff, or social services would follow up with the family representative to offer bed hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the blinds in 5 resident rooms ( Rooms 107, 112, 130, 131, and 138) of 30 resident rooms on the first floor of the facility in good condition. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, dated 12/19/2022, indicated, 3. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment. During an observation on 05/01/2025 at 9:08 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER], located on the first floor, had horizontal window blinds in place with 22 missing blind slats (individual horizontal or vertical strips of material that made up the structure of the blind). The missing window slats created an open area that measured approximately four and one half feet by eight inches that potentially exposed residents to public view. During an observation on 05/01/2025 at 8:59 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had vertical blinds with 13 missing slats. During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to refer a resident to the appropriate state-designated authority for a level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) when the resident was diagnosed with a new mental illness diagnosis for 1 (Resident #104) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program, revised 12/18/2023, revealed, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. The policy specified, 9. Any resident who exhibits a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition will be referred promptly to the state mental health or intellectual disability authority for a level II resident review. An admission Record revealed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to resubmit a level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) to the appropriate state-designated authority for 1 (Resident #81) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program, revised 12/18/2023, revealed, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. An admission Record indicated the facility readmitted Resident #81 on 12/16/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/28/2025, revealed Resident #81 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure choice was offered to accomodate a preference for a shower for one resident (Resident 304). This failure had the potential to cause psychological harm to Resident 304. Findings. Resident 304 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Spinal Stenosis (the spaces inside the bones of the spine gets too small) and Discogenic Pain (localized back pain that worsens with activities that increase pressure on the spine). On 4/7/25 at 10:20 A.M., an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) CNA 1 was conducted. CNA 1 stated on 3/21/25 in the morning, she and CNA 2 went into Resident 304 ' s room and told Resident 304 she was getting a shower then immediately transferred from the bed to the shower. CNA 1 stated during transfer, Resident 304 had urinated on herself and bowel movement. CNA 1 stated they had to put Resident 304 back to bed to clean her up, then place in the Hoyer lift to transfer Resident 304 to the shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained for one of one resident (Resident 304) when the two CNAs (1, 2) left Resident 304's naked body exposed during the delivery of care. This failure violated Resident 304's right to dignity and privacy. Findings. Resident 304 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Spinal Stenosis (the spaces inside the bones of the spine gets too small) and Discogenic Pain (localized back pain that worsens with activities that increase pressure on the spine). An interview on 4/7/25 at 11:20 A.M., with Resident 305 was conducted. Resident 305 stated she had been Resident 304 ' s roommate since she got admitted to the facility. Resident 305 stated she had seen and witnessed the incident on 3/21/25 when Resident 304 was to have a shower that day. Resident 305 stated she had seen Resident 304 yanked out of her bed, hoist Resident 304 up, and was naked. Resident 305 stated Resident 304 was in the Hoyer Lift hanging from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurses (LN) had specific competencies and training related to Central Venous Catheter site (CVC- a soft plastic tube inserted into a vein to provide vascular access for hemodialysis [a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood of people whose kidneys were not functioning properly] for 5 of 7 licensed nurses (LN). This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate assessment and delayed care and treatment of a resident with a CVC line. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- kidney failure) per the admission Record. On 8/22/24 at 4:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 3. LN 3 stated that to assess the CVC site, LNs had to examine the site and document the signs and symptoms of infection and the condition of the dressing. LN 3 further stated there would be no bruit [a whooshing sound] that happens when the blood flows to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it had an effective QAPI/QAA (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement/ Quality Assessment and Assurance) program in place to identify and make good faith attempts to correct care issues identified by Resident 81 during a complaint investigation, which included: - Wound treatments (See F-Tag 684) - Pharmacy Services (See F-Tag 755) - Medication Error Rate Greater than Five Percent (See F-Tag 759), and - Staffing, which was a repeat deficiency identified during the re-certification survey conducted on 6/15/21 through 6/21/21 (See F-Tag 725). As a result of this deficient practice, systemic care issues were identified by the survey team during a revisit conducted on 9/1/21 through 9/8/21. These failures had the potential to impact the quality of care delivered to all residents. Findings: Resident 81 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and was her own responsible party, per the facility's admission Record. On 8/10/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee failed to identify, develop, and implement action plans related to the following: 1. Baseline care plans were not consistently developed to address resident diagnoses, care, and treatments. (cross reference F-Tag 655) 2. Resident specific care plans were not consistently developed. (cross reference F-Tag 656) 3. There was not sufficient staffing to respond to resident requests in a timely manner. (cross reference F-Tag 725) These failures had the potential to affect the health and safety of the residents. Findings: On 6/21/21 at 3:34 P.M., an interview was conducted with the facility's administrator (ADM) and the director of nursing (DON) regarding the facility's QAA committee. The ADM stated the QAA committee met monthly and identified concern areas through multiple sources, which included resident council meetings, employee and resident family feedback, daily meetings, and use of the facility's hotline. The ADM stated the QAA committee was working on three areas of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the needs of seven residents (Residents 3, 12, 17, 25, 88, and Confidential Residents [CR] 1 and 2). As a result residents 3, 12, 17, 25, 88, CR 1 and CR 2 did not receive care in a timely manner, putting them at risk for skin break down and creating unnecessary fear. In addition, Resident 17 did not receive wound treatment consistently due to insufficient staffing. Findings: 1. Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include surgical aftercare, difficulty walking and muscle weakness, per the facility's admission Record. On 06/15/21 at 2:50 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 88. Resident 88 stated almost every night no one answered his call light in a timely manner. Resident 88 stated many times he had to get himself out of bed, into his wheelchair and then push himself down to the nurse's station to get help with changing of his brief and getting cleaned up.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-21 · tag F0841 — pattern
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's medical director (MD) failed to ensure medical care was provided to residents according to acceptable standards of practice for the following: - Development and Implementation of Care Plans (See F-Tag 656) - Quality of Care/Treatment (See F-Tag 684) - Accidents and Hazards (See F-Tag 689) - Dialysis Assessments (See F-Tag 698) - Sufficient Nursing Staff (See F-Tag 725) - Pharmacy Services (See F-Tag 755) - Medication Errors Greater than Five Percent (See F-Tag 759) - Lab Reports (See F-Tag 775) - Medical Records (See F-Tag 842) - Infection Control (See F-Tag 880) As a result, resident care was not provided in accordance to the facility policies and procedures, which could potentially result in physical and psychosocial harm to the residents. Findings: On 9/8/21 at 9:10 A.M., a telephone interview with the MD was conducted. The MD stated he was aware of results of the facility's re-certification survey completed on 6/21/21. The MD stated he knew there would be a revisit wherein the facility would be expected to be in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 75), had their right to refuse care honored, when certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 continued to provide care after Resident 75 had refused care. This failure had the potential for Resident 75 to feel disrespected. Findings: Resident 75 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. On 6/18/21 at 9:06 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 75 inside the resident's room. Resident 75 stated she had an incident with her assigned CNA (CNA 1) the other night on 6/16/21. Resident 75 stated she had a specific way she preferred to be cleaned after an incontinence (inability to control urine and feces) episode and that her personal hygiene routine took time. Resident 75 stated she saw CNA 1 around 4 P.M. on 6/16/21, and they both agreed upon 9:30 P.M. as the time to change her incontinence brief. Resident 75 stated CNA 1 arrived to change her after 10 P.M. Resident 75 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 247) was free from restraints when approximately seven to nine pillows were utilized in order to keep the resident from leaving the bed. This deficient practice had a potential negative psychosocial impact for Resident 247's wellbeing by being restrained. Findings: Resident 247 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission record. A review of Resident 247's admission History and Physical dated 5/28/21, indicated the resident was diagnosed with dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms characterized by memory loss that interferes with daily functioning). On 6/15/21 at 12:03 P.M., an observation of Resident 247 was conducted in the resident's room. Resident 247 was in bed laying on her back, partially covered with a sheet. Resident 247 was on a low air loss mattress (specialized mattress used to prevent pressure injuries) and had two full-sized pillows under each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete baseline care plans for 3 of 21 sampled residents (Residents 71, 199 and 200). This failure had the potential for registered nurses (RN's) and licensed vocational nurses (LVN's) and certified nursing assistant (CNA's) with the inability to care for the sampled residents. Findings: Resident 71 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include generalized weakness and urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection in any part of the kidneys, bladder and or urethra). During initial tour of the facility on 06/15/21 at 3:13 PM the resident was observed on her back in bed with eyes closed. Call light was within reach, water pitcher on the bed side table, Foley catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder) covered with a dignity bag and a nasal cannula (NC- device used to deliver supplemental oxygen to a person in need of respiratory help.) During a review of Resident 71's, care plans on 06/18/21, at 09:38 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure individualized and resident-specific written care plans were developed for three of 30 sampled residents (Residents 32, 50, and 75), reviewed for care planning, when: 1. Resident 75's personal preferences for incontinence (the inability to control urine or feces) care were not developed in a written care plan. 2. Resident 50's lack of teeth was not included in the development of a written care plan. 3. Resident 32's risk for choking was not developed in a written care plan. These failures had the potential to negatively effect the residents' health, safety, quality of life, and cause miscommunication among caregivers. Findings: 1. Resident 75 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include urge incontinence, per the facility's admission Record. On 6/18/21 at 9:06 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 75. Resident 75 stated she liked to be cleaned in a specific way after an incontinence episode. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatment was provided in accordance with the physician's order for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 17). This failure had a potential for Resident 17's wound to develop infection. Findings: Resident 17 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 6/16/21 at 9:23 A.M., Resident 17 had a wound dressing on his right hand with a date of 6/8 written on the dressing. A record review was conducted. The physician's order dated 6/7/21, indicated, Right hand abrasion: cleanse with NS (Normal saline), pat dry, apply dry dressing, every day shift every 3 days. Resident 17's June 2021 eTAR (electronic Treatment Administration Record - a record where nurses mark treatment was done) was reviewed. The June 2021 eTAR indicated the resident's wound treatment for his right hand abrasion had been initialed as done on 6/8/21, not initialed on 6/11/21, and was initialed on 6/14/21 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer (skin injuries caused by prolonged pressure on the skin) preventative measure was implemented when a pressure relieving mattress was not programmed in accordance with the physician's order for one of 5 residents (Resident 32) reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. This failure had the potential for Resident 32 to develop pressure ulcer. Findings: Resident 32 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include of Traumatic brain injury (sudden injury that causes damage to the brain), functional quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs) per the admission Record. On 6/16/21 at 9 A.M., Resident 32 was observed sitting on a wheelchair. Resident 32 had a pressure relieving mattress on his bed. Resident 32's mattress control panel indicated a setting of 1 was to be use for residents weighing up to 120 lbs. (pounds). The control panel also indicated, settings of 2 -5 were to be use for residents weighing more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) exercises for one of four residents (Resident 25) reviewed for position/mobility. This failure had a potential for Resident 25 to develop muscle weakness and contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: Resident 25 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs) per the facility's admission Record. On 6/15/21 at 3:48 P.M., an observation and interview with Resident 25 was conducted. Resident 25's left hand and fingers was observed to be stiff. Resident 25 was able to slowly move the left hand and fingers on her own. Resident 25 stated, she was not receiving any exercises on her upper extremities. Resident 25 stated, restorative nursing assistant (RNA) 1 assisted her with sit to stand exercises. Resident 25 stated, she asked RNA 1 if she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 30 sampled residents (Resident 37 and 32 ) reviewed for accidents, were free from the risk of accidents and hazards when: 1. Certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 and CNA 7 unsafely transferred Resident 37 from the resident's bed to the wheelchair. 2. Resident 32 had a crumpled up surgical mask inside of his mouth. These failures had the potential for Resident 37 to sustain falls or other injuries, and for Resident 32 to choke. Findings: 1. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms characterized by memory loss that interferes with daily functioning), difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, and a history of falling, per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 37's Annual History and Physical dated 8/26/20, indicated, .Orientation to time, place, and person: Patient appears somewhat disoriented . Recent memory appears to be mildly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label the peripherally inserted venous catheter (PIV/IV - needle inserted into a blood vessel used for hydration and/or medication) site with date, time, and initials of the licensed nurse (LN) for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 199). This failure had the potential to increase Resident 199's risk of infection. Findings: Resident 199 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cellulitis (bacterial skin infection), per the facility's admission Record. During the initial tour of the facility on 6/15/21 at 3:30 P.M., Resident 199, was observed in bed, with a PIV in her right hand. At the bedside, was an IV antibiotic hanging on the IV pole. The PIV site on Resident 199's right hand did not indicate the date, time, initials, and size of the needle used. During a subsequent interview with LN 32 on 6/15/21 at 3:46 P.M., LN 32 stated there was no time or date it was inserted, initials, or size of the needle used.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent completion of hemodialysis (dialysis- a life support treatment that replaces many of the kidney's functions) assessments for 2 of 2 sampled dialysis residents (Resident 21 and 36). This failure had the potential for miscommunication between the facility and dialysis center and to affect the continuity and quality of care for Resident 21 and Resident 36. Findings: 1. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included end stage renal disease (kidney failure), per the facility's admission Record. During an interview with Resident 21 on 6/16/21 at 9:15 A.M., the resident stated he went out for dialysis three times a week every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. During an interview with the assistant director of nursing (ADON) on 6/18/21 at 9:59 A.M., the ADON stated each dialysis resident had a binder that went with them to each treatment at the dialysis center. The ADON stated the Pre/Post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the target behaviors were appropriate and side effects were monitored for the use of psychotropic (affecting mental activity) medications for two of 5 residents (Residents 36 and 3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to monitor appropriate target behaviors for Resident 36 had the potential to affect the ordering physician's ability to determine the effectiveness of the medication. In addition, Resident 3 experienced drowsiness that was not identified and reported to the resident's physician. Findings: 1. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, which included unspecified dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with everyday activities), per the facility's admission Record. During a phone interview with Resident 36's responsible party (RP) on 6/17/21 at 9:04 A.M., the RP stated Resident 36, Can get agitated and combative at times. According to Resident 36's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the faility failed to ensure that IV tubing was labeled apropriatly for two of 30 sampled residents [199 and 200]. Findings: During the initial tour of the facility 06/15/21 at 3:30 P.M., Resident 199, was observed in bed, with a peripheral inserted catheter (PIV.) in her right hand. There was no date, time, RN initials when inserted, or the size of the needle inserted into Resident 199. At the bedside was an IV pole with IV antibiotics hanging on the IV pole, there was no label on the tubing to indicate when the tubing was hung. During a subsequent interview on 6/15/2021 at 3:46 P.M., with RN 32. RN 32 acknowledged that, there is no date or RN signature of who started the PIV or the size of the needle. RN 33 further stated there was no label on the tubing letting other RN's know when the IV tubing was hung or when to replace the tubing. During an interview and record review with RN 33, on 06/17/21, at 3:54 P.M., RN 33, stated we change peripheral IV sites every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0775 — isolated
    Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have laboratory reports filed in the resident's clinical record for one of three residents (Resident #31). As a result, the nursing staff was unable to properly assess if Resident 31 had abnormal laboratory results that had the potential for Resident 31 not to receive competent medical interventions if needed. Findings: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include ileus (intestine that gets twisted inside the body causing severe pain and potential blockage), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (bleeding inside the intestine or stomach), muscle weakness and heart disease, per the facility's admission Record. On 06/18/21 at 10:35 A.M., a record review was conducted. The record indicated that Resident 31 had blood laboratory (lab) orders from the physician on 6/3/21 that included a complete blood count (CBC), basic metabolic panel (BMP) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) with reflex. There was no documented evidence of any lab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate dental services as ordered for one resident (Resident 50). As a result, Resident 50 did not get her ordered dentures and was at risk for choking, poor nutrition, and potential loss of dignity. Findings: Resident 50 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include deficiency (lack of) of B group vitamins, aphasia (loss of ability to express speech caused by brain damage), and cerebral infarction (lack of blood supply to the brain causing brain damage) affecting the left dominant side (left side of body), per the facility's admission Record. On 06/15/21 at 11:01 A.M., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident 50. Resident 50 appeared to have no top teeth when observed during interview. Resident 50 stated she had no dentures but would like some very much. Resident 50 stated she had no top teeth and only a few bottom teeth. Resident 50 smiled and said, that would be great if I could get dentures.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one unsampled resident (Resident 23) had his food allergies, dislikes, and preferences clearly identified. In addition, some nursing staff could not identify a dislike from a food allergy. This failure had the potential to cause harm if a food allergy was served to a resident by mistake. Findings: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. On 6/15/21 at 11:59 A.M., an observation of resident dining was conducted in the second floor dining room. Resident 23 was observed eating cottage cheese. Resident 23's meal ticket dated 6/15/21, indicated, .Allergies/dislikes .cheese cottage . Preferences . Cottage cheese Resident 23 stated he liked cottage cheese. On 6/15/21 at 12:05 P.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with licensed nurse (LN) 5. LN 5 reviewed Resident 23's meal ticket dated 6/15/21 and stated cottage cheese was listed as both an allergy/dislike and a preference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' refrigerator on Station 2 was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This failure had the potential to expose the residents' food to unclean conditions. Findings: On 6/17/21 at 10:37 A.M., a joint observation of the residents' refrigerator on Station 2 was conducted with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 9. The residents' refrigerator had food stored inside that visitors and family brought in for the residents as well as snacks that were provided by the facility. The surface of the refrigerator's bottom shelves were heavily stained with dried-on brownish liquid, small pieces resembling food debris, and a loose piece of crumpled plastic wrap. The inside of the bottom drawers had dried golden stains, and small particles resembling food debris. CNA 9 stated the residents' refrigerator was dirty and the stains looked old. CNA 9 stated she did not know who was responsible for maintaining the cleanliness of the inside of the residents' refrigerator. CNA 9 stated this was the residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents' (Resident 17) medical record was accurate, when a licensed nurse (LN) documented a wound treatment as done, when the treatment to the resident's wound was not performed. This failure had the potential to cause miscommunication of Resident 17's wound treatment to the other health care providers. Findings: Resident 17 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 6/16/21 at 9:23 A.M., Resident 17 had a wound dressing on his right hand with a date of 6/8 written on the dressing. A record review was conducted. The physician's order dated 6/7/21, indicated, Right hand abrasion: cleanse with NS (Normal saline), pat dry, apply dry dressing, every day shift every 3 days. Resident 17's June 2021 eTAR (electronic Treatment Administration Record - a record where nurses mark treatment was done) was reviewed. The June 2021 eTAR indicated the resident's wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully implement infection control standards of practice when hand hygiene was not performed between glove changes during a wound treatment observation on 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 398). This failure had the potential for an increase in facility-acquired infection and medical complications for Resident 398. Findings: Resident 398 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system per the facility's admission Record. According to a physician order dated 6/8/21, Resident 398 was to have her abdominal wound cleansed three times a week; with white sponge applied to wound undermining (pockets at the wound edge) and black sponge to fill wound and wound VAC (vacuum-assisted closure: a method of decreasing air pressure around a wound to assist the healing). According to Resident 398's Wound Observation Tool, dated 6/14/21, the resident's abdominal wound was 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate staff to provide the necessary care for six confidential residents (CR 1, CR 2, CR 3, CR 4, CR 5, and CR 6), and 8 of 28 residents reviewed for sufficient staffing (90, 105, 318, 321, 44, 103, 316, and 319). This failure had the potential for residents to experience physical and emotional harm. Findings: A. Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included legal blindness, per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 90's medical record was conducted on 9/11/19. According to Resident 90's MDS (health status screening and assessment tool), dated 8/5/19, Resident 90 had a BIMS (an assessment tool for cognitive status) score of 15. A BIMS score of 15 indicated a person was considered cognitively intact. On 9/9/19 at 10:21 A.M., an interview with Resident 90 was conducted. Resident 90 stated staff took a long time to answer her call light. Resident 90 stated she walked to the bathroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the lunch menu for one of six residents reviewed for food (318). This failure had the potential for Resident 318's nutritional status to go unmet. Findings: Resident 318 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. On 9/12/19, a review of Resident 318's MDS assessment, dated 9/11/19, indicated Resident 318 had a BIMS score of 15. A BIMS score of 15 indicated cognition was intact. On 9/9/19 at 11 A.M., an interview with Resident 318 was conducted. Resident 318 stated she was on a special heart diet while she was at the facility, and received the same meal everyday pretty much. Resident 318 stated she received chicken and rice frequently, and it was depressing eating the same meal every day. On 9/10/19, a review of Resident 318's physician orders were conducted. An order dated 9/4/19 indicated Resident 318 was on a low sodium diet. On 9/9/19 at 12 P.M., an observation and interview with Resident 318…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respectful care for one of three residents (317) reviewed for dignity. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 317's psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 317 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. On 9/12/19, a review of Resident 317's MDS (health status screening and assessment tool), Section C, dated 9/11/19, indicated Resident 317's BIMS Score (test for cognitive function) was 15. A score of 13-15 indicated cognition was intact. On 9/9/19 at 10:15 A.M., an interview with Resident 317 was conducted. Resident 317 stated some nurses ignore me; I think they don't like me. On 9/11/19 at 8:50 A.M., an observation was conducted in Resident 317's room. Resident 317 was lying in bed, and asked CNA 11 to help him sit up straight in bed. CNA 11 stated she would ask for assistance from another CNA to help, and left Resident 317's room. After a few minutes, CNA 11 and CNA 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate call light device was provided to one of 26 residents (9) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failure resulted in Resident 9 being unable to call for assistance when Resident 9 required help. Findings: Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and fracture of the right index finger. On 9/9/19 at 10:01 A.M., Resident 9 was observed asleep. A soft push call-button was placed on Resident 9's lap. On 9/9/19 at 11:39 A.M., an observation and interview with CNA 21 was conducted. CNA 21 stated, Resident 9 made needs known to him by yelling out. Resident 9 attempted to press down on the push call-button with the heel of her left hand, but was weak and unable to activate the push call-button. Resident 9 was not able to bend and use her fingers to activate the push call-button. On 9/11/19 at 2:57 P.M., an interview with CNA 21 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy during the delivery of care, for one (29) of 26 residents reviewed for privacy. This failure resulted in a lack of privacy when care was provided to Resident 29. Findings: Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, impaired mobility and a right below the knee amputation, per the resident's History and Physical. On 9/9/19 at 3:24 P.M., an observation of Resident 29 was conducted in her room. Resident 29 was lying in the second bed, farthest from the door. A review of Resident 29's medical record was conducted. Resident 29's MDS (an assessment tool), dated 6/10/19, indicated the resident required a one-person, extended assistance with bed mobility and personal hygiene. Resident 29 had a BIMS Score of 12. A BIMS Score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 9/10/19 at 4:50 P.M., an observation of Resident 29 and CNA 22 was conducted. The door to Resident 29's room was wide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document a discharge status in the MDS (health status screening and assessment tool) for one of three residents (116) reviewed for MDS coding. This failure had the potential to result in miscommunication of the resident's discharge status. Findings: Resident 116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's admission Record. On 9/11/19, a review of Resident 116's Progress Notes, dated 8/13/19, indicated Resident 116 was discharged home on 8/13/19. On 9/11/19, a review of Resident 116's MDS, Section A, dated 8/13/19, indicated Resident 116's discharge status was to an acute hospital. On 9/11/19 at 3 P.M., an interview with the MDSC was conducted. The MDSC stated Resident 116's MDS was miscoded as discharge to hospital. The MDSC stated Resident 116's MDS should have been coded as discharge to home. On 9/12/19 at 12:08 P.M., an interview with the DON was conducted. The DON stated residents' information should be accurately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernail trimming in a timely manner for two of two residents (6 and 20) reviewed for ADLs. This failure had the potential to cause skin tears and infection. Findings: 1) Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included functional (limited movement) quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 6's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated, Resident 6 required extensive assistance with ADLs. On 9/10/19 at 7:55 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 6. Resident 6 had approximately half inch long fingernails on all four fingers and the thumb of his left hand. Resident 6 stated he would have liked to have had his finger nails trimmed. On 9/11/19 at 10:26 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with CNA 31. CNA 31 stated Resident 6's fingernails were too long. CNA 31 stated Resident 6's long fingernails could have scratched his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and record the urinary output for one of four residents (70) reviewed for catheter care. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 70 to have a urinary output deficit. Findings: Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease Stage 3 (a moderate decline in kidney function), and urinary retention (an inability to empty the bladder completely), per the facility's admission Record. Resident 70's Care Plan, revised 8/27/19, indicated, The resident has Indwelling Catheter. at risk for UTI (urinary tract infection) . Catheter care every shift and as needed . On 9/11/19 at 10:15 A.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with CNA 31. CNA 31 stated all the residents who have a catheter should have a urinary output chart. CNA 31 stated there was no urinary output chart for Resident 70. CNA 31 stated Resident 70 should have had a urinary output chart to record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the lunchtime meal intake for two of six residents (3 and 5) reviewed for nutrition. This failure had the potential to cause the residents to become malnourished. Findings: 1) Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included palliative care (a shortened life expectancy of six months or less), per the facility's admission Record. On 9/9/19 at 12:42 P.M., a dining observation was conducted in a facility dining room. Resident 3 was seated at a dining table with three other female residents. Resident 3 fed herself lunch from a dinner plate. Resident 3's lunch consisted of cooked ham cut into bite sized pieces, mashed potatoes and steamed green beans. The serving sizes were equal sized portions each covering approximately a third of the plate. A slice of cornbread in the shape of a biscuit was served on the side in a small bowl. A small glass of orange liquid was observed to the right of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the administration of a pain medication was documented in the eMAR for one of four residents (79) reviewed for medication reconciliation. This failure had the potential for Resident 79 to receive too much or too little pain medication. Findings: Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include an open wound, per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 79's medical record was conducted. There was a physician order, dated 9/3/19, for oxycodone 5 mg every four hours as needed for pain. On 9/12/19 at 10:59 A.M., a joint record review and interview was conducted with LN 23. Resident 79 had a medication card containing 5 mg tablets of oxycodone (a controlled medication to treat pain). According to Resident 79's CS (a log to track the number of tablets taken from the medication card), ten doses of oxycodone were signed out as taken from the medication card, from 9/4/19 to 9/11/19. Resident 79's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dietary staff member was unable to competently test the chemical concentration of the sanitizing solution. As a result, there was the potential for placing the residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings: On 9/9/19 at 8:18 A.M., a concurrent observation of the kitchen and an interview with the FSD was conducted. A red bucket with sanitizing solution was underneath the sink area. The FSD removed a test strip from a container and put it into the solution to test for the chemical concentration of the sanitizing solution. When compared to the test strip chart, the concentration was 10 parts per million (ppm). The FSD stated there was no numerical value needed for the concentration of the solution, as long as the color of the test strip after contact time was purple. In addition, the FSD added liquid bleach to the solution without measuring it, in an attempt to increase the concentration of the sanitizing solution. On 9/9/19 at 4:10 P.M., an interview with RD 1 was conducted. RD 1 stated the FSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-05-01 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post the actual hours worked by staff directly responsible for resident care for 12 of 12 shifts reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who currently resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, dated 03/10/2025, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information: a. Facility name b. The current date c. Facility's current resident census d. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. i. Registered Nurses ii. Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses iii. Certified Nurse Aides. The facility Nurse Staff Projection,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLCAlameda, CA 1 of 5Crescent City Care CenterCrescent City, CA 1 of 5French Park Care CenterSanta Ana, CA 1 of 5North Valley Nursing CenterTujunga, CA 1 of 5Tarzana Health And Rehabilitation CenterTarzana, CA 2 of 5Blythe Post Acute LLCBlythe, CA 2 of 5College Vista Post-AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Cottage Crest Post AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Diamond Ridge Healthcare CenterPittsburg, CA 2 of 5Gordon Lane Care CenterFullerton, CA 2 of 5Heritage ManorMonterey Park, CA 2 of 5Spring Valley Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 2 of 5Sunny Hills Post AcuteLa Mirada, CA 2 of 5Torrey Pines Post Acute And RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Trabuco Hills Post AcuteLake Forest, CA 2 of 5Villa Del Sol Post AcuteBellflower, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Healthcare Center, LLCAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Bonita Hills Post AcuteLa Habra, CA 3 of 5Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterRiverside, CA 3 of 5Country Oaks Care CenterPomona, CA 3 of 5Courtyard Care CenterSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Extended Care Hospital Of RiversideRiverside, CA 3 of 5Knolls West Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 3 of 5Menifee Lakes Post AcuteSun City, CA 3 of 5Mission Carmichael Healthcare CenterCarmichael, CA 3 of 5Paramount Convalescent Hosp.Paramount, CA 3 of 5Pelican Ridge Post AcuteNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Sunset Manor Conv HospEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Vineland Post AcuteNorth Hollywood, CA 4 of 5Garden Park Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 4 of 5Las Vegas Post Acute & RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ocean View Post AcuteEscondido, CA 4 of 5Park Regency Care CenterLa Habra, CA 4 of 5Pomona Vista Care CenterPomona, CA 4 of 5Sierra View Care CenterBaldwin Park, CA 5 of 5Alcott Rehabilitation HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Citrus Nursing CenterFontana, CA 5 of 5Del Mar Convalescent HospitalRosemead, CA 5 of 5Excell Health Care CenterOakland, CA 5 of 5Mission Care CenterRiverside, CA

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VISTA SKILLED LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/16/2022
JOHNSON, FRANKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/22/2021
JOHNSON, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/16/2022
FARRALES, MARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
KOCHEK, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
OXFORD, MICHEALIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/03/2022
HUNTE, ROGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2023
NORTH MELROSE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2022
SUN MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2021
VBN NEW YORK LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2022
STEINBERG, KARLIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$895K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 12%Other / private 20%

This home reported $895K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$439per resident / day
operating cost
$13,345per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$389per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555246. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next