Blythe Post Acute LLC
285 West Chanslor Way, Blythe, CA 92225 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 48 certified beds · (760) 922-8176 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.50 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.61 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 38.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.6%CMS range 23.3–51.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.5–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.4–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.57 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 48.8 residents a day — about 102% occupied, or roughly -1 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment were consistently provided. In addition, the facility failed to reassess and to monitor weekly the status of the open wound on the left side of the forehead for one of the three sampled resident (Resident 1). These failures resulted in the facility licensed nurses unaware on the changes in the resident's left forehead open wound causing a delay in the provision of an appropriate treatment. Resident 1's open wound on the left forehead was noticed with maggot infestation (parasitic skin infestation caused by the larvae [maggots]of certain fly species) on May 20, 2023; and the resident had to be transferred to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for evaluation. In addition, the resident was diagnosed with cellulitis (bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain in the infected area of the skin) to the left forehead open wound (the area infested with maggot) while at the GACH on May 20, 2023. Findings: On May 23, 2023, at 10:20 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 1) was free from verbal abuse when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) yelled profanity toward Resident 1.This failure had the potential to cause psychosocial distress, fear, humiliation, loss of trust, emotional harm, behavioral symptoms, and decline in psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 1's record was conducted. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive function).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated January 30, 2026, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - cognitive assessment) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 1's Change of Condition dated April 3, 2026, indicated the facility completed an assessment related to an allegation of verbal abuse involving a CNA.On April 15, 2026, at 11:12 a.m., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was witnessed, for one of three residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 1).This failure delayed initiation of the facility's investigation and implementation of timely measures to ensure resident safety, placing Resident 1 at risk for potential ongoing abuse.Findings:On April 3, 2026, at 10:46am, the California Department of Public Health received a call from the facility reporting an allegation of abuse involving a resident and a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA).On April 15, 2026, at 9:15 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate an allegation of verbal abuse. A review of Resident 1's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (a decline in cognitive function).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated January 30, 2026, indicated a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe use of medications when:Controlled substance (controlled medications, those with high potential for abuse and addiction) waste procedures were not implemented for five of seven randomly selected residents (Resident 50, 2, 5, 29, and 24);The Controlled Substance Records (CSR, accountability records) for two of four randomly selected residents (Residents 24 and 2) did not reconcile with the Medication Administration Records (MAR, daily documentation record used by nurses to document medications and treatments given to a resident); andPrescription medications were used for multiple residents when one medication at one of one reviewed medication carts was shared between two residents (Residents 10 and 16).These failures resulted in inaccurate accountability of controlled medications and the potential for duplicate doses and possible abuse or diversion of controlled medications. In addition, the failure to ensure prescription medications were only used for the ordered resident had the potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 11.67% when seven medication errors occurred out of 60 opportunities during the medication administration observation for five of ten residents (Residents 44, 42, 3, 13, and 2). These failures resulted in medications not given according to the physician's orders and had the potential for residents to experience side effects such as loose stools or inadequate management of conditions.Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 2/9/26 at 8:16 AM at Resident 44's bedside, Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) was observed administering two medications to Resident 44. The medications included one tablet of enteric coated (EC, coating to protect medications from stomach acid and allow absorption from the intestines) aspirin (blood thinner) 81 milligrams (mg). A review of Resident 44's Order Summary Report, dated 2/10/26, indicated Resident 44 had a physician's order, dated 7/25/25, for aspirin 81 mg capsule, Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day related to CEREBRAL INFARCTION [type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food items were stored in a sanitary manner in two of two refrigerators (Refrigerator 1 and Resident's Refrigerator), three of four freezers (Freezers 1, 2, and 3), and the kitchen counter by failing to:a. Label received food items,b. Indicate the use by date (the last date recommended for the use of the product) and/ or the open date,c. Discard food beyond the use by date.These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne diseases to 47 residents receiving food from the kitchen.Findings:During an initial observation tour of the kitchen and utility room, and interview, on 2/9/26, at 7:53 AM, with the Kitchen Staff (KS), the following were observed:a. One (1) opened whipped topping with no opened date in Refrigerator 1.b. One (1) opened container of canola oil with no opened date on the kitchen counter.c. One (1) opened can of thickener with no opened date on the kitchen counter.d. One (1) box French toast with no use by date inside Freezer 1.e. One (1) plastic bag of hashbrowns with no date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a convenient venue to both parties in the Arbitration Agreement to four of 23 sample residents (Residents 16, 26, 41, and 55).This deficient practice had the potential to prevent residents from resolving their dispute with the facility in a proper and convenient location.Findings:1. A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated Resident 16 was admitted to facility on 3/6/25, with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder (severe loss of interest in activities) and anxiety (feeling of fear and worry).A review of Resident 16's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/29/25, indicated Resident 16 had the capacity to understand and make decisions.A review of Resident 16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/24/26, Section C- Cognitive Pattern, indicated Resident 16's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 out of 15, which indicated Resident 16 had no memory impairment.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when:One resident (Resident 2) received an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication (type of psychotropic medication to treat mental illness) without required documentation of behavior or attempted non-pharmacological interventions (treatment or method used to improve symptoms without taking medication); and One resident (Resident 2) received an antipsychotic medication without specific targeted behavior.These failures resulted in one resident (Resident 2) with dementia (memory loss that gets worse over time) receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with Black Box Warnings (required drug labeling indicating the medication has a significant risk of serious or life-threatening adverse events) and had the potential for medication side effects, such as sedation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Assessment was not completed more than 14 days after admission for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 24).This deficient practice had the potential to delay the care planning process to meet Resident 24's comprehensive and individualized care needs. Findings:A review of Resident 24's admission Record (document which contains demographic and medical information) indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Nursing/Minimum Data Set Coordinator (DON-MDSC) on 2/9/26, at 2:48 PM, the DON-MDSC reviewed Resident 24's Comprehensive admission MDS Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/6/26 and stated it should be completed and signed today.A review of Resident 24's Comprehensive admission MDS Assessment, with an ARD of 2/6/26, indicated Section Z0500B. Date RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for one of three residents (Resident 50), to address the behavior of removing the nasal cannula (NC-flexible tube to deliver oxygen into the nose) used for oxygen therapy.This failure had the potential to place Resident 50 at risk for ineffective oxygen therapy and potential respiratory compromise. Findings:A review of Resident 50's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a long term condition that causes high blood sugar levels), and muscle weakness (a reduced ability to move or exert force).During an observation on 2/10/26, at 10:18 AM., in Resident 50's room, Resident 50 was observed asleep in bed with audible wheezing sounds noted. NC tubing was lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards when one of five sampled residents (Resident 8) did not have documentation to support a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disturbances in thought) in a resident with dementia (memory loss that gets worse over time).This failure had the potential for unnecessary use of antipsychotic medications (medications to treat mental illness like schizophrenia).Findings: A review of Resident 8's admission Record, dated 2/11/26, indicated Resident 8 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record further indicated diagnoses of dementia and schizophrenia with an Onset Date of 9/21/24.A review of Resident 8's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I Screening [federal assessment requirement to ensure individuals with mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide appropriate care], dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered as ordered for one of three sampled residents (Resident 50), when the nasal cannula (NC- flexible tube to deliver oxygen into the nose) tubing was not positioned in the resident's nares (openings of the nose).This failure had the potential to result in ineffective oxygen therapy and potential respiratory compromise for Resident 50. Findings:A review of Resident 50's admission Record (demographic clinical information), indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), Type 2 diabetes (a long term condition that causes high blood sugar levels), and muscle weakness (a reduced ability to move or exert force).A review of Resident 50's Order Summary Report dated 4/27/25, indicated, O2 [oxygen] at 2L per NC PRN [as needed] for shortness of breath.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of ten residents (Resident 2) was free of a significant medication error when the facility did not give lacosamide (generic for Vimpat, seizure medication) doses to Resident 2 as ordered on four of 10 days. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to experience worsening of her medical conditions, including seizures.Findings: During a medication pass observation on 2/9/26 at 9:03 AM in the dining room, Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) was observed administering five medications to Resident 2. LVN 3 stated she could not administer Resident 2's lacosamide because the facility was out of the medication.A review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report, dated 2/1/26, indicated Resident 2 had an active physician's order, dated 12/10/25, for lacosamide 50 milligram (mg) tablet, Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for anticonvulsant [seizure prevention].During an observation on 2/10/26 at 10:20 AM at Medication Cart 1, the Medication Cart 1 locked narcotic drawer was opened with LVN 1. The drawer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly close one of four metal dumpsters which exposed the overflowing trash inside.This deficient practice had the potential to attract pests which could spread disease to residents and staff in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation tour and interview, on 2/9/26, at 7:53 AM, with the Kitchen Staff (KS) at the facility's outside garbage area, one metal dumpster was not completely closed and had trash piled above the top of the container. KS confirmed the metal dumpster was partially opened with trash exposed. KS also stated the dumpsters must always be closed to prevent harboring rodents.A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, revised 10/2017, indicated, . 5. Garbage and refuse containing food wastes will be stored in a manner that is inaccessible to pests. 7. Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for one of one resident reviewed for tobacco use (Resident 1) following her re-admission to the facility, despite a documented history of marijuana use. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for adverse health effects related to medical diagnoses, unsafe use or storage of marijuana, and smoke-related safety hazards. Findings:On June 10, 2025, Resident 1's admission record was reviewed. Resident 1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure (when the heart doesn't pump blood effectively), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease) and nicotine dependence (smoker). Resident 1 had a history of marijuana use while in the facility.A review of Resident 1's History and Physical, dated June 22, 2025, indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four Certified Nursing Assistants reviewed (CNA 1) maintained an active State-approved CNA certification and current CPR certification (cardiopulmonary resuscitation - an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) before providing direct care to residents. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe and inadequate care to residents. Findings:A review of CNA 1's Employee file indicated, CNA 1's license was issued on [DATE], and expired on [DATE].A further review of CNA 1's employee file indicated no documentation of a current CPR certificate. A review of facility's Staffing Assignment dated [DATE] and [DATE], indicated CNA 1 was scheduled to work on both dates.On [DATE], at 3:50 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review of staffing schedule and employee personnel file was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated she assists with the facility's hiring process and is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe water system was in place for 44 residents when: 1. The high temperature alarm (a mechanism to alert the staff when water temperatures exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit [°F]) was not working. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk of scalding from high temperature water. 2. The facility did not monitor hot water temperature for three out of 12 days for the month of June 2025. This failure had the potential to contribute to unsafe conditions without timely staff awareness. Findings: 1. On July 3, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., during an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS). The MS stated, the facility's procedure was to monitor hot water temperatures daily. The MS stated, the high temperature alarm was used to ensure that water used by residents did not exceed 120°F. The MS further stated, the high temperature alarm at the nurses station was currently not working. On July 3, 2025, at 1:30 p.m., during an interview with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated to ensure resident safety, the MS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and document residents' vital signs (an assessment of resident's physiological stability, including a blood pressure, pulse, temperature and oxygen saturations) prior to non-emergent transport to a general acute care hospital (GACH) for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). This failure had the potential to result in unrecognized changes in condition and adverse outcomes during transport. Findings: On May 8, 2025, at 10:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a quality-of-care issue. 1. A review of Resident 1's, Personal Information, dated May 8, 2025, indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that cause airflow obstruction). Further review indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (short structured tool to assess cognitive function) score of 15 (intact cognition). On May 8, 2025, at 1:40 p.m., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to conduct a thorough investigation into Resident 1's allegation of abuse involving Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) before allowing the alleged perpetrator to return to work. This failure had the potential to expose Resident 1 to further abuse and compromised the integrity of the abuse investigation process. Findings: On March 28, 2025, at 10:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate an allegation of abuse. On March 28, 2025, at 11:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1, who stated, CNA 1 was rough while changing her brief, pushing her against the bed railing and causing pain and a bump on her left wrist on March 15, 2025. Resident 1 stated It upset me at the time. A Review of Resident 1's medical record, title, Resident Information, dated, March 18, 2025, at 11:50 a.m., indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dietary staff was able to accurately verbalize the proper cool down process (proper method of cooling cooked foods to safe temperatures). This failure had the potential to expose a population of 44 residents to foodborne illnesses (illnesses resulting from eating contaminated food). Findings: On February 27, 2025, at 2:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with the [NAME] regarding the cool down process. The [NAME] stated the cooling process from hot food temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (°F- unit of measurement) to ambient temperature of 70°F would take one hour and from 70°F to a cold temperature of 40°F, it would take less than an hour. The [NAME] further stated when she had questions about the cool-down process, she would refer to the cool down log. A review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Food Preparation and Service, dated April 2019, indicated .Potentially hazardous foods are cooled rapidly. This is defined as cooling from 135 degrees F to 70 degrees F within 2 hours and then to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices when: 1. Turkey and bologna were not maintained at safe temperatures within the refrigerator; 2. One dietary staff was observed preparing milk for residents without wearing a beard net; 3. The airconditioning unit air inlet /outlet grill was dirty; 4. An unlabeled juice container, intended for cleaning the grill, was stored alongside food items; and 5. A quaternary (quat) sanitizer test kit readily available in the kitchen was expired. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) among a vulnerable population of 44 out of 45 residents who received food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings: 1. On February 25, 2025, at 10:10 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, with Dietary Manager (DM), turkey and bologna in the reach-in refrigerator were warm to the touch. Temperature measurements indicated: -Turkey deli slices (20 slices): 46.7°F -Bologna slices (8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not available for use for one resident (Resident 99) and in an E-Kit (a kit containing urgently needed medications to quickly treat the residents without delay) This failure resulted in Resident 99 receiving an expired medication. This failure also had the potential for facility residents to receive sub-therapeutic medication therapy from expired medications. Findings: 1. On February 26, 2025, at 8:35 a.m., during a medication pass observation, LVN 1 prepared morning medications doses which included Atrovent (medication for shortness of breath) inhaler for Resident 99. The expiration date on the manufacturer's label on the canister of the Atrovent inhaler indicated, 12/2024, It was observed LVN 1 did not check the expiration date of Atrovent inhaler during the morning medication preparation for Resident 99. In a concurrent interview, LVN 1 confirmed the expiration date. LVN 1 stated the medication was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure multi-resident bedrooms provided the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident in seven out of 17 rooms (Rooms 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the residents' quality of life. Findings: A review of the facility's, Census, dated, February 25, 2025, indicated, all resident bedroom assignments, and the number of resident's sharing each room. During initial tour of the facility on February 25, 2025, Rooms 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 were observed to contain three beds each, with three residents per room. On February 25, 2025, at 10:52 a.m , an interview was conducted with the Administrator (AM). The AM stated, the facility had to provide residents with bedrooms measuring at least 80 square feet per resident in a multi-resident rooms. The AM further stated that Rooms 5 through 12 each measured 239 square feet, accommodating three residents per room, resulting in approximately 79.6 square feet per resident. The AM stated, these rooms did not meet the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for three residents (Resident 3, 18, and 32), the consultant pharmacist identified, and made recommendations on, non-standardized and inconsistent procedures by nursing staff for holding blood pressure medications that were ordered by the physician without holding parameters to residents. This failure had the potential for ineffective management of the residents' hypertension (high blood pressure (BP). Findings: On February 27, 2025, during a record review for Resident 3, 18, and 32, the following was noted: 1. Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure; A review of the physician order on January 30, 2025, for lisinopril (BP) medication 40 mg (milligram, unit of measurement) with the direction to give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension with no hold parameters; A review of the physician order on January 30, 2025, for carvedilol (BP) medication 3.125 mg with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications (medication to treat thought disorder that changes sense of reality) were used after non-pharmacological interventions were tried and the residents were assessed to be distressed and a danger to self or others. This failure resulted in one resident (Resident 18) with dementia receiving an unnecessary antipsychotic medication with a boxed warning issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA, a federal agency that regulates drugs and other products). A boxed warning is the strongest warning the FDA requires and signifies the drug carries a significant risk of serious events. Findings: A review of Resident 18's medical record was conducted: Resident 18 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance; A review of the physician order on March 6, 2024, for Seroquel 50 mg (milligram, unit of measurement) with the direction to give one tablet by mouth two times a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 11.11% when three medication errors occurred out of 27 opportunities during the medication administration for two out of seven residents (Resident 99 and 39). The deficient practice resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and had the potential for residents not receiving the full therapeutic effects of medications with the potential for worsening of residents' medical conditions. Findings: 1. On February 26, 2024, at 8:35 a.m., during a medication pass observation, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) was observed preparing five medications to Resident 99. LVN 1 was observed handing the fluticasone/salmeterol (generic for Advair 250/50, used for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], a lung disease causing breathing problems) inhaler to Resident 99 with an instruction, in English, to spit out the water in the cup on the bedside tray. Resident 99 did not positively acknowledge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor Resident 35's dietary preference by serving fish during a meal. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 35, affecting the resident's nutritional status and overall well-being Findings: A review of Resident 35's admission Record indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included muscle weakness and failure to thrive (physical decline in older adults). A review of Resident 35's MDS (Minimum Data Set an assessment tool) dated November 28, 2024, indicated a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 (cognitively intact). A review of Resident 35' s meal ticket indicated .Lunch .NO: FISH .Dinner .NO: FISH . On February 27, 2025, at 11:42 a.m., during tray line observation, Resident 35 's tray ticket was reviewed and indicated the NO FISH preference for both lunch and dinner. On February 27, 2025, at 12:15 p.m., the [NAME] placed a slice of fish on Resident 35's tray.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) usage was clearly indicated before entering rooms of residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP - a set of infection control measures using gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO)]. This failure had the potential to result in staff and visitors being unaware of necessary PPE requirements prior to entering rooms requiring isolation precautions. Findings: A review of the facility document titled, RESIDENTS WITH ENHANCED BARRIER PRECAUTIONS, undated, indicated, Residents 4, 6, 7, 8, 18, 21, and 37 were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. On February 27, 2025, at 2:51 p.m., Residents 4, 6, 7, 8, 18, 21, and 37 rooms did not have EBP signage posted by the door. There was no indication of which bed was on EBP. On February 26, 2025, at 9:24 a.m., during concurrent interview and observation with Resident 7 and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA) 1 stated Resident 7 had a wound on the right foot and was on EBP. CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct and complete neurological assessment (neuro checks - assessment of neurological function and [LOC]-level of consciousness) for the first hour after an unwitnessed fall for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in serious consequences, including loss of consciousness, seizures (uncontrolled movements), and coma (unable to wake up) which could go undetected. Findings: On January 16, 2025, at 9:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a quality-of-care issue. On January 16, 2025, at 9:35 a.m., a concurrent observation & interview with Resident 1 was conducted. Resident 1 was observed in her room, lying face down on the floor next to her bed. Resident 1 was turned over onto her back, then helped to sit on her bed, by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Observation of Resident 1, indicated, a small pinkish, discolored area of resident's right forehead. Resident 1 stated she had fallen, hit her head,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan (Identified healthcare conditions, including individualized goals and interventions) addressing the use of an illegal drug (marijuana- mind-altering [psychoactive] drug) while at the facility, for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). This failure has the potential to result in mismanagement of resident's medical health issues for Resident 1 and 2. Findings: On October 30, 2024, at 11:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a quality-of-care issue. On October 30, 2024, at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), who stated, on October 25, 2024, at approximately 4:00 p.m., she witnessed Resident 1 outside, who stated, I feel weird, like I'm having a stroke. The MS stated, she assisted Resident 1 into the facility and notified the nursing staff. A review of Resident 1's admission records undated, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor the change in condition for one of two residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to delay necessary treatment for Resident 1. Findings: On October 30, 2024, at 1:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), who stated, on October 25, 2024, at approximately 4:00 p.m., she heard Resident 1 saying she felt weird and felt like she was having a stroke. The MS stated, she assisted Resident 1 into the facility and notified nursing staff. A review of Resident 1's admission record, undated, indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included embolism (a vascular clot) and thrombosis (blood clot). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated July 20, 2024, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (a cognitive assessment) score of 15 (cognitively intact). On October 30, 2024, at 3:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' admission orders included all current medications, and the correct dosages for two out of three sampled residents (Residents 4 & 5) when: 1. Resident 4 ' s admission order for Sertraline (an anti-depressant medication) had an incorrect dosage; and 2. Resident 5 ' s admission orders did not include her asthma (a lung disease that causes difficulty breathing) inhalers, Symbicort (medication to help manage and prevent symptoms in residents with asthma) and albuterol (medication used to treat asthma). This failure resulted in: 1. Resident 4 receiving an incorrect dosage of Sertraline on September 6, 2024, which could result in worsening of depression. 2. Resident 5 not receiving physician orders for her asthma medications, which could result in breathing difficulties and worsening asthma symptoms. Findings: On September 24, 2024, at 9:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a quality-of-care issue. 1. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective pest control program to address the presence of flies in the building. This failure resulted in flies in the facilities common areas and resident bedrooms potentially leading to infections, increase in health issues such as gastrointestinal infections or skin irritations to vulnerable population in the facility. Findings: On September 24, 2024, at 9:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a quality-of-care issue. 1. On September 24, 2024, at 9:50 a.m., a concurrent interview with Resident 1 and an observation of the resident's bedroom were conducted. Resident 1 stated, he had noticed an increase in flies in the facility and in his bedroom. Resident 1 stated, Sometimes they bother me. Resident 1 was observed swatting at a fly in the air as he spoke. Resident 1 further stated, staff had given him a fly swatter to help with the flies. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical records, titled, Face Sheet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged abuse involving three of three residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, and 3) were reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) immediately or within 24 hours. This failure resulted in a delayed investigation of the alleged abuse causing a delay in implementation of corrective actions which placed the residents at risk for further abuse. Findings: On September 5, 2024, at 9:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate an abuse allegation. A review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (an illness in any part of the urinary tract, the system of organs that makes urine.) A review of Resident 1 ' s Change of Condition (COC) Assessment form, dated August 30, 2024, indicated, .allegedly (sic) verbally abused by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) . A review of Resident 1 ' s progress notes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat Resident 1's possessions with respect for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when facility did not store resident's electric wheelchair in a manner which would keep it clean and damage free. The failure had the potential to damage Resident 1's electric wheelchair, while in storage. Findings: On July 01, 2024, at 8:20 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a Quality-of-Care issue. On July 01, 2024, at 10:57 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1, who stated, her electric chair was being stored at the facility, while not in use. On July 16, 2024, at 10:42 a.m., a concurrent interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), and observation of Resident 1's electric wheelchair in the storage room were conducted. The MS stated, Resident 1's electric wheelchair was being stored in the maintenance/supply office. The MS stated, Resident 1's wheelchair was not protected with any type of cover, and a large roll of silver window insulation was sitting on top of the wheelchair. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2), services within reasonable accommodation of the resident's needs and preferences: 1. The facility did not have a working electric Hoyer lift, preferred by Resident 2 for transfer assists; and 2. The facility has one large Geri-chair which was unavailable for use by the resident because it was shared among multiple residents. These failures had the potential to exclude Resident 2 from being transferred out of bed, and sitting comfortably in a chair, while out of bed. Findings: On July 16, 2024, at 8:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a quality-of-care issue. On July 16, 2024, at 10:20 a.m., a concurrent observation of Resident 2 and interview was conducted. Resident 2 was observed lying in bed, watching t.v. with a disheveled appearance, as his hair appeared uncombed. Resident 2 stated, he relies on staff to transfer him via a Hoyer lift (A lift device used by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate cardiology specialty (specialty doctor that treats conditions related to the heart) care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3), after a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm) on May 4, 2024. This failure had the potential to result in worsening cardiac (heart) function, stroke (occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts), and/or other serious medical complications. Findings: During an interview on July 1, 2024, at 12:05 p.m., with Resident 3, Resident 3 stated she was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation during a recent admission to the hospital several weeks ago. Resident 3 stated it was a new diagnosis that she never had before. Resident 3 stated about a week after she returned to the facility, she asked the DON (Director of Nursing) to notify the physician about the need to follow up with cardiology. Resident 3 stated she reminded the DON again last week of the need for an appointment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two of four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3), were free of significant medication error when the prescribed Augmentin (amoxycillin and potassium clavulanate - drug used to treat bacterial infections in many different parts of the body (ear, lungs, sinus, skin, urinary tract) was not administered on three occasions for Resident 1 and on two occasions for Resident 3. This failure had the potential to worsen both residents' infections, leading to prolonged illness and discomfort. Findings: On June 8, 2024, at 11:50 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a quality of care and treatment issue. 1. During an interview on June 8, 2024, at 1:26 p.m., with Resident 1, she stated it takes three days for her to receive Augmentin. Resident 1 stated last night (June 7, 2024), she did not receive her antibiotics because the facility ran out. Resident 1 further stated the antibiotics would not be effective in killing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the diet order was followed according to the physician's order, for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3), when Residents 2 and 3 did not receive lemon pound cake on lunch meal tray on 7/1/2024 according to the diet ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to result in compromising Resident 2 and 3's nutritional and medical condition. Findings: 1. On July 1, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., a concurrent meal tray observation and review of Resident 2's Meal Tray Card, on July 1, 2024, were conducted. Resident 2 was observed being served cheesecake with cherry topping. A review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, printed July 1, 2024, indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the pancreas does not produce enough insulin [a hormone that regulates the movement of sugar into the cells] and cells respond poorly to insulin and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required 80 square feet (sq ft) per resident (80 sq ft/resident) in a multi-resident bedroom, was met for 8 out of 18 rooms (Rooms 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, & 12). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the quality of life of the residents. Findings: On July 1, 2024, at 8:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a Quality-of-Care issue. On July 1, 2024, at 930 a.m., a concurrent interview with Resident 1 and an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] bed C were conducted. Resident 1 stated, her room size was Ok, but sometimes she had difficulties navigating her wheelchair through the room. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have three residents sharing the room, with an unobstructed path from each bed to the bedroom door. One staff member was observed attending to roommates' needs without difficulty due to room size. A review of Resident 1's, Face Sheet, dated, July 1, 2024, indicated, resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice to resident of a pending room change for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to develop anxiety, confusion, and emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 3's medical records, titled, Face Sheet, dated July 1, 2024, indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes shifts in moods and concentration). A review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated May 18, 2024, indicated, Resident 3 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (mental cognition assessment) score of 15 (cognitively intact). On July 1, 2024, at 12:33 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 3, who stated her room was recently changed to a new room. Resident 3 stated, she liked her previous room more. A review of Resident 3's medical records, titled, Progress Notes, indicated the following: -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain temperatures between 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F), with resident room temperatures in three of six sampled resident rooms, reaching 84.7 degrees F. This deficient practice resulted in discomfort for two of eleven sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2), and potential adverse health effects for residents, staff and visitors including dehydration (loss of body fluids), heat stress (a series of conditions where the body is under stress from overheating), and heat stroke (when the body can no longer control its temperature). Findings: An unannounced visit was conducted on June 25, 2024, at 12:32 p.m. to investigate a complaint related to the facility 's physical environment. On June 25, 2024, at 1:41 p.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was observed lying in bed near the window with the shades closed, perspiring with a small fan running on his bedside table. Resident 1 stated he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. The laundry staff transported the clean laundry uncovered; 2. Facility did not sanitize washer in between laundering. 3. The facility did not monitor for legionella (bacteria that can cause a severe from of pneumonia [lung condition]) in the water system annually. These failures potential to increased cross-contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object or place to another) which could result to increse infections to facility residents. Findings: 1. On January 31, 2024, at 8:25 a.m. a staff member was observed exiting the laundry room with clean clothes and linens on an uncovered laundry cart. On January 31, 2024, at 8:48 a.m., during an interview was with Laundry Staff (LS) 1, she stated, she put clean, folded clothes of the resident in the the laundry cart uncovered. LS 1 further stated, she transported the uncovered laundry cart through the dirty area to deliver the clean laundry to the residents. LS 1 stated, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were provided information on how to file a grievance. This failure had the potential for residents to not be able to address their issues and voice their concerns which could worsen the existing problems. Findings: During an interview on January 30, 2024, at 9:33 a.m., with the resident council, multiple residents (Residents 12, 26, 30, 31, 33, and 39) stated they were not given information on how to file a grievance. During an interview on February 2, 2024, at 12:01 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated, Social Service Director was responsible for the resident's grievances. During an interview on February 2, 2024, at 12:12 p.m., with the Social Service Director (SSD), the SSD stated, If the resident will ask about the grievance process, they will be taught how to file a grievance, but the facility does not inform all residents on admission. During a review document titled, The Facilty admission Agreement, Facility Rules and Grievance Procedure, dated, May, 2011, indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four residnets sampled (Residents 14, 24 and 33's) skin was monitored and assessed in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures. This failure had the potential for Residents 14, 24, and 33 to develop skin breakdown and or pressure injury (PI's- localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue over a bony prominence or from a medical device) affecting the residents overall health and wellbeing. Findings: 1. On February 1, 2024, at 10:40 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) inside Resident 14's room. The coccyx (tailbone) area was observed to have an open skin and had no dressing in place. The DON stated, the coccyx had an open wound with a red base and has a small serosanguinous drainage (blood and clear yellow liquid.) The DON further stated, the wound measured four centimeters (cm - unit of measurement) in length, 4 cm in width and 0.25 cm in depth. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities were identified during monthly medication regimen review (MRR) by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) and recommendations were made to ensure appropriate use of medications when the CP did not make recommendations on the use of medications that were on the Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medications for elderly over the age of 65 for three of the five residents reviewed (Residents 5, 9 and 43). In addition, the facility failed to employ CP services for monthly review of all facility residents' medication regimen in October 2023. This had the potential to expose residents to severe adverse events from inappropriate medication use. According to, American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults by the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel, in the May 7, 2023's issue of Journal of the American…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when the Dietary Supervisor (DSS) and [NAME] (CK) 1 was unable to accurately verbalize the cool down process for hot food and ambient food temperatures. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: On January 30, 2024, at 10:15 a.m., during an interview with CK 1 of the cool down process for hot food and ambient food temperatures inside the kitchen. CK 1 stated the hot food cooldown temperature starts at 165 degrees, then check every 30 minutes for one and a half hours with a goal temperature of 145 degrees. CK 1 further stated as long as the food reaches 145 degrees, she does not check the temperature of the food again. CK 1 stated the cool down process for ambient food temperature is after food was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary environment, prepare, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. There were multiple areas in the kitchen and kitchen equipment that were not clean; 2. Multiple wet and moist pans and pots were stored and stacked on top of each other; 3. Multiple chopping boards had brown-yellowish discoloration and multiple deep cuts and indentations; 4. There was a 1/3 open container of salsa found on the kitchen preparation counter left at room temperature; 5. The inside of the ice machine had a black goo-like grime; and 6. The resident refrigerator had no thermometer gauge and no temperature monitoring. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: 1. On January 29, 2024, at 10:10 a.m., during a walk-through observation inside the kitchen with the Director of Staffing Development (DSD), the following were observed: a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, one (1) microwave oven, two (2) bottom oven shelves, four (4) oven door hinges, and one (1) dry storage room shelf were maintained in a safe operating condition. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: On January 29, 2024, at 12:15 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview inside the kitchen of the small and large oven bottom shelves and the oven door hinges with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and [NAME] (CK) 1. The two (2) bottom shelves inside the oven and the four (4) oven door hinges were observed to have a brown-copper discoloration. The DSD and CK 1, both stated, the brown-copper discoloration is rust. The DSD and CK 1 further stated, rust should not be there and the oven should be clean to prevent food cross-contamination and foodborne illness. On January…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident's share of cost and amount of charges for the items and services covered by Medicare (federal health insurance for anyone aged 65 and older)/Medicaid (federal and state program that gives health coverage to some people with limited income and resources), for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 43). This failure had the potential to result in confusion and frustration for Resident 43, affecting his psychosocial and mental wellbeing. Findings: During an interview on January 29, 2024, at 3:37 p.m., with Resident 43, he stated, They (the name of the facility) were taking all my money. Resident 43 stated, he was getting 35 dollars a month. Resident 43 further stated, he cannot live with 35 dollars, he had monthy bills to pay. During an interview on January 31, 2024, at 10:36 a.m., with the Business Office Manager (BOM) 2, she stated, she should have informed Resident 43 about the share of cost and charges to services covered by Medicaid. BOM 2 further stated, she should have informed Resident 43 upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessments were conducted for two of three residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident 33 and 42), 1. Resident 33's functional impairment of the upper extremities and lower extremities. This failure had the potential to affect management of care for Resident 33's current functional impairment which could cause further decline in mobility; and 2. Resident 42 had no natural teeth. This failure resulted for Resident 42 not receiving the appropriate level of care and treatment. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on January 31, 2024, at 9:03 a.m., with Resident 33, in his room, Resident 33's left wrist was flexed inward, and could raise about two inches high from the bed. Resident 33 could not raise his left foot but could move his left big toe. Resident 33 stated that's the best he can do. During a review of Resident 33's HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION (H&P), dated January 2, 2024, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled for eight consecutive hours in a 24-hour period for January 21, 2024, and January 28, 2024. This failure had the potential to adversely affect oversight and direction regarding residents' quality of care and quality of life directly impacting overall health and well-being. Findings: During a review of the RN monthly schedule, dated January 2023, indicated there was no RN coverage for January 21, 2024, and January 28, 2024. During a review of January 2024 payroll records indicated there was no RN coverage for January 21, 2024, and January 28, 2024. On February 1, 2024, at 10:53 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated there was no RN scheduled to cover the facility on January 21, 2024, and January 28, 2024. The DON stated the policy is we staff RNs for 8 hours per day. On February 6, 2024 at 9:23 a.m., an interview was conducted with the facility Administrator (ADM), he stated we have to meet requirements for state and federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility's policies and procedures were developed and implemented to track accurately the movement of controlled substances (CS) and to fully account for use of all CS to minimize the time and loss of diversion. Two out of three residents' medical record did not accurately account for removal and administration of CS. This had the potential for drug diversion by impaired staff caring for the residents. Findings: On January 30, 2024, at 11:45 a.m., during the medication cart inspection with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, blister cards containing controlled substances (CSs) stored in the locked drawer of the cart were audited to determine the accuracy of CS use documentation. The discrepancies in the documentation of CS use were as follows: 1. Resident 38's blister card indicated there were 23 doses of oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 10 mg remaining. The label on the blister card had the direction to give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for severe pain; The resident's Controlled Substance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician order when the medication Humalog Injection Solution (Insulin Lispro) a rapid-acting insulin was administered to the resident at a lower dose, for one of one resident reviewed for insulin (Resident 26). This failure had the potential for the medication to inadequately control resident's blood sugar level leading to hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Findings: A review of Resident 26's record, indicated, Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). A review of Resident 26's physician order dated January 23, 2024, indicated, .HumaLOG Injection Solution (Insulin [medication used to lower blood glucose] Lispro) inject as per sliding scale . If 60 - 200 = 0 units (unit of measurement); 201 - 250 = 2 units; 251 - 300 = 4 units; 301- 350= 6 units; 351 - 400 = 8 units; 401 - 500 = 8 units & (and) call MD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dental appointment for dentures to a resident without dentition for one of one resident reviewed for dental (Resident 42). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate chewing, oral health issues such as gum disease. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on January 30, 2024, at 2:37 p.m., with Resident 42, she had no teeth. She stated, she had been without teeth since admission. She stated, she missed eating an apple. Resident 42 stated, she was not asked if she needed a denture. A review of Resident 42's record indicated, Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included spondylolisthesis (a displacement of a bone in which the bone slides out of its proper position). A review of Resident 42's record titled, Order Summary Report, for the month of October 2023, indicated, .DENTAL CONSULT FOR EVALUATION AND TREATMENT AS NEEDED . A review of the facility document titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Provide a safe environment to help prevent falls, as Resident 3's bedrails were not up, per doctor's (Dr's) orders, prior to his unwitnessed fall on October 12, 2023. 2.The facility failed to identify Dizziness, as a resident specific fall risk, prior to Resident 4's unwitness fall on October 9, 2023, and failed to incorporate Resident 3's history of Feeling Dizzy, into his resident-centered ' Falls care plan, per facility's Policy & Procedure (P&P), Falls and Fall Risk, Managing. These failures could have resulted in Resident 3 & Resident 4, experiencing additional falls, resulting in injuries. Findings: 1. On November 1, 2023, at 9:35 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a Quality-of-care visit. On November 1, 2023, a review of Resident 3's admission records was conducted. Resident 3's facesheet (A document that gives a resident's medical information at a glance), indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure a pain re-assessment was completed, after Resident 2 received Tylenol 650mg for complaints of back pain, after an unwitnessed fall on October 24, 2023. This failure could have led to Resident 2 continuing to experience unrelieved back pain. Findings: On November 1, 2023, a review of Resident 2's admission records was conducted. Resident 2's facesheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Muscle weakness, reduced mobility and Parkinson's disease (A progress disease of the nervous system marked by tremors and muscle ridgidity). Further review indicated Resident 2's BIMS score was 15 (Cognitive intactness). A review of Resident 2's SBAR, dated, October 24, 2023, at 3:02 a.m., by LVN1, indicated, resident had experienced a fall, and her vital signs were taken and withing normal limits. A pain assessment was not completed by LVN1. A review of Resident 2's progress notes, dated October 24, 2023, at 3:02 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a properly functioning call light system in Resident1's bathroom, which did not activate each time the call light cord was pulled. This failure had the potential to delay staff's assistance in Resident1's bathroom, when the improperly functioning call light cord was pulled. Findings: On November 1, 2023, an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a Quality-of-Care issue. On November 1, 2023, at 9:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident1, who indicated, his bathroom call light did not work, stating, They (staff members) keep jiggling it (Bathroom call light), it'll work for a minutue, then (Bathroom call light) doesn't work again. On November 1, 2023, at 3:40 p.m., an observation of Resident1's bathroom was conducted. The call light was pulled in the bathroom to engage the call light system, indicating the call light and alarm did not turn on or alarm. The call light did not function. On November 1, 2023, at 3:50 p.m., a concurrent interview with CNA1, and observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide monitoring on a resident who wandered to other resident's room, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in an allegation of physical abuse. Findings: On September 5, 2023, at 11:35 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to the facility to investigate an allegation of abuse. a. Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (memory loss). A review of Resident 1's document titled History and Physical (H&P), dated March 15, 2023, the H&P indicated, .This resident .does NOT have the capacity to understand and make decisions . During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool), dated July 27, 2023, indicated, Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. During review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated August 24, 2023, the PN indicated, .Notified .that resident (name of Resident 2) came into Resident's room .resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse conducted an assessment and monitoring of the purplish black discoloration (bruise) observed on the right hand, for one of three sampled residents (Resident A). This failure had the potential to result in delayed provision of care and treatment for Resident A's skin condition. Findings: On October 9, 2023, at 10:50 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of quality of care/treatment. On October 9, 2023, at 1:05 p.m., in a concurrent interview and observation of Resident A in the room with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), he stated Resident A had a bruise measuring 6 centimeters (cm) by 8 cm on the right hand. The CNA stated, she observed the bruise on Monday (October 2, 2023). The CNA stated, Resident A's bruising should have been recorded. Resident A's record was reviewed. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who observed a new skin discoloration (bruise) on the resident's left thigh documented and notified the licensed nurse of a change of condition, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the resident to experience a delay in treatment and further compromise resident's physical and emotional wellbeing. Findings: On September 21, 2023, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included unspecified cirrhosis of liver (a type of liver damage where health cells are replaced by scar tissue). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated August 22, 2023, indicated: - .Poor safety awareness .monitor and document any skin tears, abrasions, lacerations, bruising, or c/o pain . - .Be free of injury r/t falls prevention of injury is goal .monitor and document any skin tears, abrasions, lacerations,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to complete a 5 day summary and an abuse investigation in a timely manner, after accusations of verbal abuse towards Resident 1 which were reported to the facility Administrator. This failure had the potential to subject Resident 1 to further incidents of verbal abuse. Findings: On July 26, 2023, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for an abuse issue. A Review of Resident 1 ' s medical records, face sheet, indicates, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Diabetes mellitus (A disease which cause high blood sugars), Obesity (Weight higher than what ' s considered health), and high blood pressure. Further review indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview Mental score of 15 (intact mental cognition). On July 26, 2023, at 2:22 p.m., and interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated, The other day (CNA1) was arguing with me, because she wouldn ' t touch her own cell phone because, she said her hands were dirty, so I said, don '…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, to prevent the presence of flies within the building.This failure had the potential to result in flies infestation inside the facility, which could negatively impact the health and safety of the residents. Findings: On May 23, 2023, at 10:20 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a quality-of-care issue. During concurrent observation, flies were observed in the facility lobby, hallway, and were observed crawling on a resident. On May 23, 2023, at 11:36 a.m., two staff members were observed walking the facility hallways, and into the resident rooms with fly swatters. A record review of Resident 1 ' s medical record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 09, and diagnoses which included squamous cell carcinoma (cancer of the skin) of the (Forehead of the top of head), muscle weakness and reduced mobility. On May 23, 2023, at 10:50 a.m., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the required air temperature ranging from 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit inside the resident's rooms on multiple occasions. This failure increased the risk for dehydration and could negatively affect the residents' already compromised health condition. Findings: On July 18, 2023, at 9:55 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a physical environment issue. On July 18, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), the MD stated the facility air conditioning contractor instructed her not set the thermostat below 75 degrees F. The MD acknowledged the facility thermostat near the nursing station was set at 79 degrees F and reading 79 degrees. She stated the Director of Nursing (DON) increased the temperature to 79 degrees. She stated she was not in the facility at the time. On July 18, 2023, at 10:10 a.m., during an observation with the MD, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to regularly maintain and inspect the oven within the facility. This failure had the potential to affect the overall safety of the vulnerable residents of the facility. Findings: On June 7, 2023, at 11:05 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an issue on physical environment. On June 7, 2023, at 11:45 a.m. the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was interviewed. The DSD stated yesterday (June 6, 2023), at 8:30 a.m., there had been a gas odor throughout the building. The DSD stated, the staff promptly guided the residents outside of the building. On June 7, 2023, at 12:05 p.m. the Maintenance Director (MD) was interviewed. The MD stated the gas leak from the oven was caused by a broken gas connector tubing. A review of the (Name of Gas Company) document titled Job Order, dated June 6, 2023, indicated .Check House line no leaks. Found connector leaking on Range. Replaced connector . On June 7, 2023, at 1: 15 p.m., the MD was again interviewed. The MD stated, the oven did not receive regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of the six sampled residents (Resident 2), the call light button within his reach and easily accessible. This failure has the potential to result in Resident 2 not getting the help he needed. Findings: On June 29, 2023, an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint allegation. On June 29, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 was in bed, alert, and conversant. Resident 2' s call light button was observed to be wrapped around the call light box that was attached to the wall on the right side of the bed. Resident 2's call light button was not within his reach. Resident 2 stated he did not know where his call light button was. On June 29, 2023, Resident 2's record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Muscle Weakness, Other Reduced Mobility, Osteoarthritis (a joint disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure multi-resident bedrooms provided the required minimum of 80 square feet of livable space per resident in eight of 18 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12).This failure limited residents' available personal space and had the potential to affect residents' ability to move safely and freely within the room. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review with the Administrator (ADM), on 2/10/26, at 9:16 AM, the facility's room waiver request approval letter, dated 4/24/25 was reviewed. The ADM stated the facility had a room waiver for Rooms 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. The ADM stated the facility submitted a letter requesting re-approval of the room waiver on 1/5/26, for the 2026 waiver period.During an observation on 2/10/26, at 8:44 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], three beds were observed in the room and two were occupied with residents. During an environmental observation tour with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.3 | -2.3 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUNZALAN, RUSTICO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| BLYTHE POST ACUTE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/21/2025 |
| MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/05/2014 |
| CHAMBERS, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/27/2014 |
| RODRIGUEZ, LEONEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| WILLIAMS, LUIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/10/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555383. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.