Mission Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 39.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.36 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.64 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.40 to 1.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the written notice of proposed transfer and discharge was provided to the resident or resident representative (RR), for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for the resident or resident representative not to be aware of the transfer/discharge rights and process to appeal the transfer/discharge. Findings: On May 20, 2026, at 11:06 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint regarding discharge. On May 20, 2026, Resident 2's medical record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (the lungs have a long-term, ongoing problem getting enough oxygen into your bloodstream), tracheostomy (a surgically created hole in the front of the neck that leads directly into the windpipe), and dependence on respirator (ventilator) ( body relies on a machine to breathe because your lungs or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice, for one of nine residents (Resident 2), when nursing staff did not use appropriate safe handling precautions for a hazardous drug (medication that can cause birth defects and requires special handling for safety), letrozole (used to treat breast cancer), in accordance with professional standards and the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to expose residents and staff to serious reproductive risks such as infertility, miscarriage, or other pregnancy related complications. Finding: A review of Resident 2's admission Record, dated May 6, 2026, indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including breast cancer. A review of Resident 2's medical record indicated a physician's order for letrozole 2.5 mg (milligram, unit of measurement) oral tablet, give 1 (one) tablet via G-tube (gastrostomy tube, a small flexible tube inserted through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing monitoring and assessment, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4), when there was a change of condition of increased drainage from the resident's neck lesions/wounds on January 14, 2026. In addition, there were no care plan developed to address Resident 4 who was at risk for infection due to increased wound drainage and odor. Findings:On February 3, 2026, at 9:53 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint involving quality of care and treatment.On February 3, 2026, Resident 4's medical record was reviewed. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of tongue (a serious oral cancer) and tracheostomy (an opening in the neck leading directly to the windpipe).A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated December 12, 2025, indicated Resident 4 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the code status (a legal document or instruction that outlines a patient's wishes regarding medical care, particularly if they experience a cardiac or respiratory arrest) and presence of medical device was communicated accurately to the receiving facility when the resident was transferred to the acute hospital, for one of three residents sampled (Resident A). This failure had the potential to result in Resident A not to receive the correct code status during the resident's hospital stay, and could have a delay in care and treatment when the presence of medical device was not initially communicated to the receiving facility. Findings: On [DATE], at 9:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate for a complaint of resident rights and quality of care. On [DATE], at 10 a.m., a review of Resident A's medical record was conducted. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly disposed off the facility grounds when multiple items were observed stored and stacked on top of each outside a trailer container. This failure had the potential to attract and harbor pest and rodents. Findings: On February 12, 2025, at 2:54 p.m., during a tour outside the facility with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), multiple items of discarded wood, poles, signs, broken fans, metal frames, bath chairs, wooden pallets, bags of cement mix, and hoses stacked on top of each were observed beside the storage trailer. In a concurrent interview, the MS verified those items beside the storage trailer were discarded items. The MS stated discarded items should not be stored beside the storage trailer and should be disposed properly in the garbage binto prevent harboring of pests and rodents. A review of the facility's policy and procedures titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, dated December 19, 2022, indicated, .Surrounding area shall be kept clean so that accumulation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, handle, and serve food, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a highly vulnerable population of seven (7) residents who eat frood from the facility kitchen, when, two (2) oven gloves were observed with dark stains thick brown/black substance on the fingers and multiple patches of white substance. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination and cause food borne illnesses in a highly vulnerable population of seven (7) residents who eat food from the kitchen. Findings: On February 10, 2025, at 10:53 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), two (2) oven gloves were observed hanging on a hook on the wall for use by the cook. The oven gloves were observed with dark stains and a thick brown/black substance on the finger tips and, along the posterior of the hand piece and multiple patches of white substance were obsered up the sleeve of the overn gloves. One oven glove had worn area with loose threads with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were implemented when emergency water was stored in a clean environment. This failure had the potential for the spread of contaminates and/or infections to residents and staff. Findings: On February 12, 2025, at 2:54 p.m., an observation of the storage shed outside the facility was observed with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS). Several gallons of emergency water bottles were observed stored inside the storage shed. The water bottles were observed directly placed on the soiled and dusty floor next to chemical containers with warning labels. The top of the water bottles were observed with loose dirt. The water bottles were stored in a cluttered area with various items, including tools, soap dispensers, a broken fan, a broom, and mop sticks, and other items. The ceiling of the storage shed were observed to have loose particles and debris which had accumulated and fallen onto the water bottles. There was buildup of debris by the hole in the shed, which led to area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control were followed when: 1. The facility's water system was not tested for Legionella (a bacteria whichcould cause a serious type of pneumonia [lung infection]) and other waterborne diseases. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for health complications related to Legionella; and 2. Three suction tubings (flexible tubes used for the removal of secretions) and one Yankauer (a tool used to suction oral secretions) were not dated, for three of three residents (Residents 2, 17 and 34). In addition, two Yankauers were not changed according to the facility's policy and procedure, for two of three residents (Residents 1 and 17.) This failure had the potential to cause an increased risk for respiratory infection for Residents 2, 17 and 34. Findings: 1. On January 10, 2024, at 11:06 a.m., an interview with the Maintenance Director (MTD) was conducted. The MTD stated the facility had a water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A risk for entrapment (an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail) assessment and least restrictive alternatives were conducted prior to use of bed rails, for sixteen of sixteen residents reviewed for bed rails (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 16, 22, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 35, 37, and 40). In addition, the risk for entrapment assessment did not indicate the resident's size and weight in relation to the dimensions of the bed being used for the resident according to the facility's policy and procedure. 2. The risk for entrapment assessments conducted were not specific to the bed rails being used by the residents, for six of sixteen residents reviewed for bed rails (Residents 2, 3, 16, 28, 37, and 40); and 3. An appropriate indication for the use of bed rails, for three of sixteen residents reviewed for bed rails (Residents 1, 2, and 9). These failures had the potential for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served and prepared in a sanitary condition and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety practice when: 1. There were multiple areas in the kitchen, kitchen equipment, and food storage areas that were not clean; 2. The kitchen floor was not clean and had pores, indentation, cracked, and missing flooring tiles; and 3. The resident refrigerator had multiple unlabeled food items. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for foodborne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: 1. On January 8, 2024, at 10:10 a.m., during a walk-through observation inside the kitchen with the Dietary Supervisor (DSS), the following were observed: - The storage pitcher shelves and multiple spice container lids were observed to have a whitish-gray debris; - The fire extinguisher metal bracket to the right top corner area of the coffee machine was observed to have hair like debris; - The walls at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $638K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA