No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Alcott Rehabilitation Hospital

3551 West Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90019 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 121 certified beds · (323) 737-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (323) 737-2000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 20232 actual-harm citations$8,824 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (18% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,824 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-18)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
903 Crenshaw Blvd Ste 206A · (213) 507-7530 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3511 W Olympic Blvd Ste 101 · (323) 731-0600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4027 W Olympic Blvd · (323) 939-9292 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Country Club DR · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication1.5%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.2%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.432.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.801.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 224 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
7.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.3%CMS range 31.3–44.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF7.6%CMS range 5.4–10.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.6–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.641.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.48
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
17.8%
Total nursing turnover
5.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 110.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had history of falls, diagnosis of fractured thigh bone, and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), received the care, treatment and services to prevent falls. The facility failed to: -Provide the correct level of assistance (two or more while eating) per the comprehensive assessment and the fluid imbalance care plan. - Implement a comprehensive person-centered fall care plan to include supervision of Resident 1 to prevent falls. As a result, on 1/7/2024, at 7 PM, Resident 1 fell from her bed and sustained a second acute fracture of the right radius (the thicker and shorter of the two long bones in the forearm) and a fracture of the ulna (the other of the two bones which make up the lower forearm). Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-10-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of three residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to protect Resident 1's right to be free from physical abuse by a Certified Nursing Attendant (CNA) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 12/19/2022. As a result, Resident 1 suffered a right femur (bone in the thigh) fracture (cracking or breaking of a bone) on 10/15/2023 and was transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) for further evaluation and management on 10/15/2023 at GACH at 5:15 PM. On 10/16/2023 Resident 1 had open reduction internal fixation (ORIF-surgical procedure that puts pieces of a broken bone into place using screws, plates, or rods that are used to hold the broken bone together) to repair the right femur fracture. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility (skilled nursing facility [SNF]) initially on 11/5/2021 with a readmission to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the rights exercised by the resident's representative (RP) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to obtain consent from Resident 1's responsible party (RP) before cutting Resident 1's hair on 12/9/25.This deficient practice resulted in a violation of Resident 1's RP's right to make decisions on behalf of Resident 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/21/25 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) fracture of right femur (break in thigh bone), lack of coordination, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 11/26/25 indicated Resident 1 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident 1 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, shower/bathe, lower body dressing and putting on/taking off footwear. Resident 1 needed substantial assistance (helper does more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for showers and feedings were provided those services for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2).1.For Resident 1, who had a shower scheduled every Monday and Thursday, the facility failed to give Resident 1 shower on 11/24/25 (Monday), 11/27/25 (Thursday) and 12/1/25 (Monday). The facility also failed to notify Resident 1's responsible party (RP) when Resident 1 did not receive the showers on Resident 1's scheduled shower days. 2.For Resident 2, the facility failed to assist Resident 2 timely during breakfast on 12/23/25. Resident 2's breakfast tray was observed at the bedside table at 7:25 a.m. Resident 2 was not fed until 8:02 a.m.These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 1 to develop including unpleasant odor, skin condition and for Resident 2's food to become cold and lose its palatability.1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control measures necessary to prevent the spread of infections by failing to:1. Ensure staff labeled laundry bins indicating if they were for clean or dirty items in the facility's laundry room.2. Discard and remove from the facility's storage room expired N95 (a disposable face mask that covers the user's nose and mouth which offers protection from small solid or liquid droplets found in the air) masks and expired Covid-19 (a respiratory illness that can spread from person to person) testing kits. These failures had the potential to place residents at increased risk of infection and cross-contamination (process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect).Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:55AM, with the Maintenance Worker (MW) in the laundry room, light gray fabrics were observed in a yellow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the residents' rights to dignity and respect for one of one sampled residents (Resident 110). By failing to utilize privacy curtains or closing the door while the resident was undressed from the waist down. This deficient practice left Resident 110 exposed to facility staff, residents, and visitors, leaving Resident 110 vulnerable to exploitation, humiliation, and safety concerns.Findings: During a review of Resident 110's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/2/2025 and readmitted the resident on 8/2/2025 with diagnoses including other sequelae(after effects) of cerebral infarction (a stroke caused by a blocked blood vessel in the brain), immunodeficiency(the decreased ability of the body to fight infections and other diseases) due to conditions classified elsewhere, dysphagia(difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder( excessive worry, fear, and nervousness) unspecified, vascular dementia (a progressive state of decline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (a legal document indicating resident preference on End-of-life treatment decisions) were discussed and written information were provided to the residents and/or responsible parties for one (1) of 1 sampled residents (Resident 84).This deficient practice had the potential to result in resident's healthcare wishes not being known or followed, placing the resident at risk of receiving unwanted or inappropriate treatment. Findings:During a review of Resident 84's admission Records, the admission Records indicated Resident 84 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with a diagnosis of aftercare following joint replacement; presence of right artificial knee joint; type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 84's History and Physical (H&P) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately destroy or remove identifiable information on discarded medications for two (2) out of 2 sampled residents (Resident 87, 91). This deficient practice has the potential for unauthorized release of resident's personal information. Findings: During a review of Resident 87's admission Records, the admission Records indicated Resident 87 has original admission date on 6/02/23 and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses of dysphagia following cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing after a stroke); gout, unspecified (type of arthritis that causes painful, swollen joints due to too much uric acid a natural waste product); muscle weakness(Generalized)(weakness in many muscles throughout the body.During a review of Resident 87's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 09/17/25, the MDS indicated that the resident has the capacity to make herself understood and to understand others. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment tool) assessment for the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP, nursing interventions that aim to promote, maintain, and support a resident's ability to perform at their highest level) was accurately performed for two of three sampled residents (Resident 79 and Resident 86). These failures had the potential to result in adequate care for Resident 79 and Resident 86.Findings: During a review of Resident 79's admission record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/27/2024 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body), cerebral infarction (stroke, loss of blood flow to part of the brain), Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), and dementia (a progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatments and services to maintain or improve mobility (ability to move) and Range of Motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 79 and Resident 86). By failing to:1. Implement Resident 79's Restorative Nursing Program (RNP, nursing interventions that aim to promote, maintain, and support a resident's ability to perform at their highest level) for walking as indicated Resident 79's Care Plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions and the specific care and services facility staff need to provide a resident to promote healing and prevent a worsening of a condition) Report initiated 4/4/2025.2. Implement Resident 86's RNP for Active Assisted ROM (AAROM, when the resident uses the muscles surrounding the joint to perform the exercise but requires some help from the therapist or equipment) as indicated in Resident 86's Care Plan Report revised 9/30/2025. These failures had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three of eight sampled staff (the Environmental Services Director [EVSD], Certified Nursing Assistant 2 [CNA 2] and Dietary Aide 1 [DA 1], maintained infection control practices (refers to policies and procedures used to minimize the risk of spreading infections) during a COVID-19 (a respiratory illness that can spread from person to person) outbreak (a rise in the number of cases of a disease) in the facility by failing to: 1.Ensure the EVSD performed hand hygiene (a general term that applies to hand washing, antiseptic hand wash, and alcohol-based hand rub) after throwing a cup in the trash for a resident (unidentified) in room A. 2. Ensure CNA 2 and DA 1 wore an N95 mask (highly effective air filter for your face designed to block a very high percentage of tiny particles, including those that can carry viruses like COVID-19 from being breathed in or exhaled). These deficient practices had the potential to spread infection and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement its policies and procedure on infection control to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19, a highly contagious infection affecting the respiratory system caused by a virus that can spread from person to person). By failing to: 1. Ensure all personnel wear N95 mask (disposable face mask that covers the user's nose and mouth which offers protection form small solid or liquid droplets found in the air) during the COVID-19 outbreak. 2. All staff perform COVID-19 test at beginning of their shift. 3. Pause resident activity during the COVID-19 outbreak. 4. Use dedicated shower room for COVID-19 positive residents only. 5. Place portable air purifiers with High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA, can help reduce airborne contaminants including viruses in a building or small space) in all hallways. These deficient practices had the potential to continue to spread the COVID-19 to all residents, staff, and visitors.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control procedures when the facility did not screen family members and visitors for three day on signs and symptoms of Coronavirus (COVID-19, a contagious and infectious disease that is characterized by fever and cough and is capable of progressing to severe symptoms and in some cases death, especially in older people and those with underlying health conditions) during a COVID-19 outbreak (a sudden increase in occurrences of a disease when cases are in excess of normal expectancy for the location or season) in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the spread of COVID 19 to residents and staff. Findings: During an observation on 10/17/2024 at 11:50 AM, Family Member (FM) 1 was observed entering the facility unmasked. Upon entering the facility, FM 1 was observed entering Resident 15's room. FM 1 did not screen themselves for sign and symptoms of COVID-19. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 12 PM, FM 1 stated they did not sign in on the visitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect for one of five sampled residents (Resident 51) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 was observed standing over Resident 51 while feeding the resident lunch. This deficient practice had the potential to cause psychosocial harm to the Resident 51 and violated the resident's right to be treated with dignity. Findings: A review of Resident 51's face sheet (admission record), indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 9/25/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that the loss interferes with a person's daily life and activities), lack of coordination (a condition that affects muscle control), muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/30/2024, indicated the resident had severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 43), who suffered from depression. Resident 43's care plan did not include the resident's preferred activities. This deficient practice caused an increased risk of Resident 43 having meaningful activity to promote and enhance the resident's quality of life. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (depression [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily activities of living]), dementia (a chronic condition that causes a gradual decline in cognitive abilities, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning), muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size and thinning of muscle tissue). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review, update, and/or revise the care plans for two of three sampled residents (Resident 71 and Resident 75). Resident 71 did not have current wound care treatment indicated for the Stage III sacral pressure ulcer and Resident 75's care plan did not include updated interventions for pressure injury prevention. These deficient practices had the potential to affect the provision of necessary care, treatment, and services for Resident 71 and Resident 75. Findings: a. A review of Resident 71's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and pressure ulcer of sacral region Stage III. A review of the Physician's Orders dated 9/27/2024, indicated to cleanse the sacro coccyx (tail bone) pressure injury with normal saline (NS-a salt solution), pat dry, apply Santyl (medication that removes dead…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 75), who was assessed as a moderate risk to develop pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) was provided with a pillow or heel protectors (pressure relieving devices) to the left and right heels and repositioned every two hours and PRN (as needed), per the resident's care plan. This deficient practice placed Resident 75 at increased risk for developing pressure sores. Findings: A review of Resident 75's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type II diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and vascular dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services for one of two sampled residents (Residents 84) at risk for decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) and mobility. Resident 84 did not receive Restorative Nursing Aide program (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) treatments for passive range of motion (PROM, movement at a given joint with full assistance from another person) exercises and left knee extension splint, per the care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to cause further decline in functional mobility, ROM, and quality of life for Residents 84. Findings: A review of Resident 84's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (condition that causes weakness or an inability to move on one side of the body) following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards to prevent avoidable accidents for one of two sampled residents (Resident 306), who was admitted to the facility with a history of falls and was at continued risk for falls, by failing to: -Accurately assess Resident 306's risk for falls dated 9/10/2024. -Evaluate and analyze fall risk hazards, implement individualized interventions to reduce risk of falling, and monitor for effectiveness of interventions. -Reevaluate and update individualized interventions to prevent recurrent falls after Resident 306 fell on 9/16 and 9/17/2024. -Ensure Resident 306 was not left without staff supervision in the facility patio. As a result, on 9/16/2024 Resident 306 stood up from the wheelchair in front of the nurse's station and fell. On 9/17/2024, Resident 306 was left alone in the wheelchair with a family member and Resident 306 fell again from the wheelchair. These deficient practices placed Resident 306 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one opened vial of Novolin R (a medication used to control blood sugar) was labeled with an open date per the manufacturer's requirements in one of two inspected medication carts (West Medication Cart.) The deficient practices of failing to store or label medications per the manufacturers' requirements increased the risk that residents could have received medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage or labeling possibly leading to health complications resulting in hospitalization or death. Findings: During a concurrent observation on [DATE] at 11:06 AM of [NAME] Medication Cart, with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), the following medications were found either expired, stored in a manner contrary to their respective manufacturer's requirements, or not labeled with an open date as required by their respective manufacturer's specifications: -One opened vial of Novolin R was found stored at room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have a policy that addressed how to store and reheat resident's left-over food brought into the facility from outside kitchens / restaurants to ensure safe and sanitary food storage, handling, and consumption. This deficient practice had the potential to cause food borne illness in residents in the facility who were served the food brought by family or visitors. Findings: During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 2:45 PM, Registered Nurse (RN 1) stated resident families were encouraged to bring enough food for one meal and take the leftovers home or discard the leftovers. RN 1 stated the facility did not encourage the storage of resident food brought from outside. RN 1 stated facility policy did not allow storing perishable food (food that needs refrigeration) for residents. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 3 PM, RN 2 stated there was no refrigerator for residents to keep food brought from the outside. RN 2 stated there was a refrigerator in the Director of Nursing's (DON) office that could be used for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation to the state survey agency (SSA) within 2 hours for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This deficiency resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health and had a potential for ongoing resident-to-resident altercations leading to resident harm. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 7/20/2021 with diagnoses including ischemic heart disease (heart damage caused by poor blood flow to your heart), Type II diabetes (a long term condition I which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy, leading to high sugar levels in the blood), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damages and cannot filter blood as well as they should), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and dementia (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 1) received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent a fall by failing to ensure bed siderails were up before leaving the resident's bedside. This deficient practice led Resident 1 falling from her bed on 11/23/2023 resulting in a laceration which required stitches. Findings: On 11/23/2023 9:50AM an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate an allegation that Resident 1 had sustained an injury of unknown origin. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated facility admitted the [AGE] year old female on 09/30/2023 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a condition caused by disrupted blood supply and restricted oxygen supply to part of the brain) affecting the right dominant side, urinary tract infection (UTI), Alzheimer ' s disease (a brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for Personal Protective Equipment are implemented by failing to: a. Ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant 1 and Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) wear the full personal protective equipment (PPE-a barrier precaution which includes the use of gloves, gown, mask, face shield, when anticipating coming in contact with blood, body fluids or other communicable toxins or agents) while providing care to four out of 10 sampled residents (Resident 5, 6, 7, 8's) room who are on transmission based precaution. b. Ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) wear a fit-tested NIOSH approved N95 or higher-level respiratory protection (mask that protect used by filtering out contaminants in the air) in the facility. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious diseases and increase the risk of infection to the residents, staffs and visitors. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures (P&P) of incident reporting for unusual occurrence for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to report an unusual occurrence to the State Survey Agency and send a written report within 24 hours of Resident 1's death. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health and had potential to place other residents during an COVID-19 (an infectious disease that can cause respiratory illness in humans) outbreak. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a document that indicates what emergency treatment a resident wants the facility to provide if the resident's heart or lungs stop working) were accurate and/or complete for three of ten sampled residents (Resident 11, Resident 255, and Resident 256) as evidenced by observations of blank POLSTs signed by a physician in Resident 11's, Resident 255's and Resident 256's active chart. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 11, Resident 255, and Resident 256 receiving medical treatment that would not honor the resident's wishes and decisions regarding end-of-life care. Findings: a. A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on [DATE] and re-admitted the resident on [DATE] with diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery (a surgical procedure in which parts of a damaged joint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent the growth of microorganisms that could cause food borne illness as evidenced by: -Failing to label and date an opened bottle of white distilled vinegar and a half sandwich in two out of four refrigerators. -Failing to dispose of an open bag of tater tots and a can of granulated mushroom bullion which had past their use by date. These deficient practices had the potential to place residents in the facility at risk for food borne illness and/or contamination. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on 10/30/2023 at 7:47 AM, the following were observed: -An opened bottle of white distilled vinegar with a received date of 10/23/2023. The opened bottle of white distilled vinegar was observed half empty without an open or use by date. -Half a sandwich wrapped in plastic wrap without a label or date. -An open bag of tater tots with an open date of 9/12/2023 and a use by date of 10/17/2023. -A can of granulated mushroom bullion with a receive date of 2/16/2023, an open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy and dignity by leaving a resident uncovered without pants, with briefs (adult diaper) showing, and without use of privacy curtain for one of one sampled resident (Resident 306). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 306 to experience loss of privacy and dignity. Findings: A review of Resident 306's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/13/2023 with unspecified dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily functioning/life), Parkinsonism (degenerative disorder affecting the motor system with symptoms that included shaking, rigidity, slowness of movement and difficulty with walking and gait), and diabetes mellitus Type II (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]). A review of Resident 306's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/10/2023 indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired (decisions poor; cues/supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report serious bodily injury to the state survey agency (SSA) within 24 hours for two of three sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 87). The facility failed to report: -Resident 18, an [AGE] year-old confused female, who sustained a left clavicle fracture (broken bone) after a fall on 8/22/2023. -Resident 87, an [AGE] year-old confused female who on 8/19/2023, had left wrist swelling and was then transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) and diagnosed with a wrist fracture (broken bone). Five days after the wrist fracture, on 8/24/2023, Resident 87 fell in her room and was unable to relate how she fell. These deficient practices resulted in a delay of onsite inspection from the SSA and caused an increased risk of injuries or potential abuse to Resident 18 and Resident 87. Findings: a. A review of Resident 18's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 18 on 11/29/2018 and readmitted her on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive admission assessment for elopement risk (leaving the facility without staff knowledge, presenting an imminent threat to the resident's health and safety) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 19). This deficient practice caused an increased risk of Resident 19's elopement and care plan goals. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 19 on 1/25/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily functioning/life), chronic kidney disease Stage IV (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys' failure to filter waste from the blood and excrete into the urine), and congestive heart failure (CHF - heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen). A review of a Physician's Order for Resident 19 dated 6/28/2023, indicated Ambien (sedative [induce sleep or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for at risk for falls for one of three sampled residents (Resident 87), who sustained a fall on 8/24/2023 and was unable to explain how the fall occurred. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 87 at risk for recurrent falls. Findings: A review of Resident 87's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/4/2023 and readmitted her on 8/20/2023 with diagnoses including encephalopathy (disease of the brain manifested by an altered mental state sometimes accompanied by physical changes), muscle weakness, and diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar). A review of Resident 87's Care Plan initiated 8/5/2023, indicated the resident was a fall risk due to unsteady gait, delirium, and encephalopathy. The care plan goal was to provide preventive intervention to minimize injury potential. -What were the interventions? A review of Resident 87's Cognitive Loss Care Plan, initiated 8/5/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a communication device with the language that the resident was able to understand for one of one sampled resident (Resident 98). This deficient practice prevented Resident 98 from communicating with the staff and had a potential to delay receiving appropriate care/treatment the resident needed. Findings: A review of Resident 98's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 98 on 8/30/2023, with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily functioning/life), generalized muscle weakness (lack of physical or muscle strength and the feeling that extra effort is required to move your arms, legs, or other muscles), and hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure). A review of Resident 98's Minimum Data Set (MDS - standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 9/2/2023, indicated the resident was cognitively mildly impaired (some difficulty in new situations only). The MDS indicated Resident 98's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the actual direct care staffing hours were posted daily in the facility for the month of October. As a result, the actual hours worked by the staff was not readily accessible to residents, family or visitors. Findings: During an observation on 11/1/2023 at 1:07 PM, posted in the lobby of the facility, the Nurse Staff Projection Form, dated 10/31/2023, indicated for the three shifts (Day shift, evening shift and night shift), there were a total of 402 hours for seven Registered Nurses (RN), five Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs), 33 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), three Restorative Nurse Assistants (RNA), one Treatment Nurse, two Minimum Data Set Coordinators and one admission staff. The Nurse Staff Projection Form indicated the average daily census was 109. The projected Nursing Hours Per Patient Day (NHPPD) was 3.688 hours. The projected CNA NHPPD was 2.477. It also indicated 0.00 for Actual NHPPD and 0.00 for Actual CNA NHPPD. There was also a column for Actual hours worked for all listed staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 50) who received Remeron (an antidepressant) had a gradual dose reduction (GDR - the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) attempted. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the continued use of unnecessary medications causing adverse consequences. Findings: A review of Resident 50's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life) without behavioral disturbance and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of the Physician's Order for Resident 50 dated 11/17/2022, indicated to administer Remeron 15 mg by mouth at bedtime for poor oral intake. A review of the Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review, dated 7/3/2023, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe provision of pharmaceutical services by failing to remove an expired morphine sulfate solution (opioid analgesic [a class of medication], indicated for the relief of moderate to severe pain) medication, from the Middle East medication cart 2, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 17). This deficient practice had the potential to cause medication errors by possibly administering an expired medication. Findings: A review of Resident 17's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 to the facility on 8/5/2022 with medical diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), chronic kidney disease stage 1 (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys' failure to filter waste from the blood and excrete into the urine), hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (inability to move one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow resulting in severe damage to some of the brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices as evidenced by: -Failing to label and date intravenous (IV - a way to give fluids, medicine, nutrition, or blood directly into the blood stream through a vein) tubing for Resident 6. -Failing to ensure Resident 81 had a date on the nasal cannula (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen placed directly on a resident' s nostrils) to ensure prompt weekly changing of the nasal cannula. These deficient practices had the potential to result in complications of intravenous and oxygen therapy, including the spread of diseases and infection. Findings: a. A review of Resident 6's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/26/2023 with diagnoses that included sepsis (the body's extreme reaction to an infection that can lead to organ failure, tissue damage, and death), hydronephrosis (a condition where one or both kidneys become stretched and swollen as the result of a build-up of urine inside them), polyneuropathy (damage of the body's peripheral nerves),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the requirement for no more than four residents per room for one of 63 resident residential rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide necessary and safe nursing care and privacy for the residents in room eight.Findings: During multiple room observations conducted in room eight from 12/1/2025 to 12/4/2025, nursing staff were observed with adequate space to provide care to the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Each resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have privacy curtains for privacy, working call-lights, a dresser and a bedside table. During review of the facility's room waiver request letter dated 12/4/2025, the room waiver request letter indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] did not meet the 4 bed per room regulation. The letter indicated room [ROOM NUMBER]was in accordance with the special needs of residents and would not have an adverse effect on the residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 24 out of 63 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 6, 8, 12,19, 24, 26, 30, 32, 37, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46, 48, 50, 54, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, and 63) met the required 80 square feet per resident regulation. This failure had the potential to result in the inadequate space necessary to provide safe nursing care and privacy for residents.Findings: During multiple room observations conducted from 12/1/2025 to 12/4/2025, nursing staff were observed with adequate space to provide care to the residents in each facility resident room. Each resident was observed to have privacy curtains for privacy, working call-lights, a dresser, and a bedside table. During a review of the facility's room wavier letter dated 12/4/2025, the letter indicated the facility was requesting a room variance (room size different from required amount) for 24 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 6, 8, 12,19, 24, 26, 30, 32, 37, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46, 48, 50, 54, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the requirement for no more than four residents per room for one of 63 resident residential rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide necessary and safe nursing care and privacy for the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview 10/17/2024 at 9:56 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER], a total of five residents were in the room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), CNA 1 stated the facility staff had no issues when providing care in the resident's rooms. CNA 1 stated if the facility staff needed to use a Hoyer lift (mechanical device that helps caregivers safely transfer patients who have limited mobility), for example, there was enough space to provide care and the Hoyer lift did not invade the space of any of the other residents. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 10:16 AM, Registered Nurse (RN 1) stated she believed there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure 24 out of 63 rooms (Rooms 4, 6, 8, 12, 19, 24, 26, 30, 32, 37, 39, 40, 41, 45, 48, 50, 54, 56, 58, 59 61, 52, 62, and 63) met the required 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space necessary to provide safe nursing care and privacy for residents. Findings: During an observation on 10/17/24 at 11:07 AM, the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) measured rooms 4, 6, 8, 12, 19, 24, 26, 30, 32, 37, 39, 40, 41, 45, 48, 50, 54, 56, 58, 59 61, 52, 62, and 63. The rooms measured as follows: Room No: Room Sq. Resident Capacity: Square Ft. 4 216 sq ft 3 beds 19.16x11.25 6 223 sq ft 3 beds 20.5x11 8 377 sq ft 5 beds 22.16x17 12 223 sq ft 3 beds 19.25x11.58 19 142 sq ft 2 beds 11.41x12.41 24 218 sq ft 3 beds 19.25x11.33 30 218 sq ft 3 beds 19.25x11.33 32 216 sq ft 3 beds 19.16x11.25 37 228 sq ft 3 beds 20x11.41 39 222 sq ft 3 beds 19.5x11.41 40 222 sq ft 3 beds 19.5x11.41 41 222 sq ft 3 beds 19.5x11.41 45 222 sq ft 3 beds 19.5x11.41 46 222 sq ft 3 beds 19.5x11.41 48 222 sq ft 3 beds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the requirement for no more than four residents per room for one of 24 sampled resident residential rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide necessary and safe nursing care and privacy for the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings: A review of the Client Accommodation Analysis form completed by the facility, indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] housed five beds. On 9/1/2023, the Administrator submitted a letter requesting for a waiver for rooms with more than four residents per room for room [ROOM NUMBER] with five residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/30/2023 at 9:40 AM, five residents were observed located in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The five residents were observed to have sufficient space and privacy. The five residents located in room [ROOM NUMBER], verbalized no concerns with their privacy and or the amount of space in the room. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the required room size of 80 square feet for 24 of 44 resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in continued inadequate space to provide the necessary safe nursing care and privacy for the residents. Findings: A review of the Client Accommodations Analysis form indicated the following: Room No: Room Sq. Footage: Resident Capacity: Square Ft. Per 4 216 3 72.00 6 223 3 73.33 8 377 5 74.33 12 223 3 73.33 19 142 2 71.00 24 218 3 72.66 30 218 3 72.66 32 216 3 72.00 37 228 3 76.00 39 222 3 74.00 40 222 3 74.00 41 222 3 74.00 45 222 3 74.00 46 222 3 74.00 48 222 3 74.00 50 218 3 72.66 54 218 3 72.66 56 222 3 74.00 58 221 3 73.66 59 222 3 74.00 61 221 3 73.66 62 225 3 75.00 63 222 3 74.00 A review of the facility's request for Room Size Waiver dated 9/1/2023, indicated a waiver request for the following rooms: Rooms 4, 6, 8, 12, 19, 24, 26, 30, 32, 37, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46, 48, 50, 54, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62 and 63. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,824 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-01-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLCAlameda, CA 1 of 5Crescent City Care CenterCrescent City, CA 1 of 5French Park Care CenterSanta Ana, CA 1 of 5North Valley Nursing CenterTujunga, CA 1 of 5Tarzana Health And Rehabilitation CenterTarzana, CA 2 of 5Blythe Post Acute LLCBlythe, CA 2 of 5College Vista Post-AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Cottage Crest Post AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Diamond Ridge Healthcare CenterPittsburg, CA 2 of 5Gordon Lane Care CenterFullerton, CA 2 of 5Heritage ManorMonterey Park, CA 2 of 5Spring Valley Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 2 of 5Sunny Hills Post AcuteLa Mirada, CA 2 of 5Torrey Pines Post Acute And RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Trabuco Hills Post AcuteLake Forest, CA 2 of 5Villa Del Sol Post AcuteBellflower, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Healthcare Center, LLCAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Bonita Hills Post AcuteLa Habra, CA 3 of 5Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterRiverside, CA 3 of 5Country Oaks Care CenterPomona, CA 3 of 5Courtyard Care CenterSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Extended Care Hospital Of RiversideRiverside, CA 3 of 5Knolls West Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 3 of 5Menifee Lakes Post AcuteSun City, CA 3 of 5Mission Carmichael Healthcare CenterCarmichael, CA 3 of 5Paramount Convalescent Hosp.Paramount, CA 3 of 5Pelican Ridge Post AcuteNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Sunset Manor Conv HospEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Vineland Post AcuteNorth Hollywood, CA 4 of 5Garden Park Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 4 of 5Las Vegas Post Acute & RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ocean View Post AcuteEscondido, CA 4 of 5Park Regency Care CenterLa Habra, CA 4 of 5Pomona Vista Care CenterPomona, CA 4 of 5Sierra View Care CenterBaldwin Park, CA 4 of 5Vista View Post AcuteVista, CA 5 of 5Citrus Nursing CenterFontana, CA 5 of 5Del Mar Convalescent HospitalRosemead, CA 5 of 5Excell Health Care CenterOakland, CA 5 of 5Mission Care CenterRiverside, CA

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
INLAND MEDICAL ENTERPRISES INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 05/01/1988
DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
FARRALES, MARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
JOHNSON, FRANKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/12/1989
KOCHEK, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
OXFORD, MICHEALIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2022
KIM, DO YOUNGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/24/2020
PARK, SERENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/25/2022
PRESNELL, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/12/1987
RHEEM, JUSTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/13/2022
SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICESOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/12/1989
YARMISH, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/28/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 32%Other / private 3%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$408per resident / day
operating cost
$12,414per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$461per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056293. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next