Community Care And Rehabilitation Center
4070 Jurupa Avenue, Riverside, CA 92506 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 162 certified beds · (951) 680-6500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.64 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 80.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 166 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.1%CMS range 42.7–57.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.9–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 80.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 80.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 5.6–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 153.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility policy and procedures were implemented to prevent and identify the development of a pressure injury (PI- bed sore) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when an open area of the skin identified on Resident 1 ' s sacrum (a large, triangular bone at the base of the spine) on August 30, 2024, was not assessed and was not provided treatment. These failures resulted in Resident 1 developing a stage 3 PI (full -thickness tissue loss, exposing fat tissue) which was identified on September 13, 2024. Findings: On October 22, 23, and November 4, 2024, unannounced visits were conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included paraplegia (inability to move the lower parts of the body), post-polio syndrome (a condition that causes gradual muscle weakness and muscle loss that can affect people who've had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident A), did not use oxygen (O2) while smoking. Resident A lit a cigarette while receiving O2 resulting in burns to his face and the left side of his abdomen. This failure also created an unsafe environment for other residents who smoked. Findings: During an observation on June 26, 2023, at 2:11 p.m., Resident A was observed sitting in a wheelchair. Resident A was observed receiving O2 at six L (liters - a unit of measurement) via nasal cannula (N/C - a device used to deliver O2 through a tube and into the resident's nose) via the oxygen concentrator (a machine that converts room air to air with a higher oxygen level). Resident A was awake and alert with multiple facial wounds to his nose and cheeks, and redness and scabs to his face. A white colored cream covered Resident A's facial wounds. A second wheelchair was observed at Resident A's bedside that had an O2 tank attached at the back of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan indicating the resident was not to be assigned male Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) was implemented and communicated to staff members, for one of two residents, Resident 1.This failure resulted in Resident 1 being assigned to male CNAs and had the potential to result in Resident 1 to feel afraid and uncomfortable.Findings:A review of Resident 1's face sheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included multiple fractures (break in the bone) of ribs on the right side.A review of Resident 1's History and Physical dated April 28, 2026, indicated she has the capacity to understand and make decisions.A review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report initiated on May 15, 2026, and revised on June 8, 2026, indicated the resident has a behavior problem r/t (related to) confabulation of allegations against staff. The care plan interventions initiated on June 8, 2026, indicated .No male CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was completed according to professional standards of practice for two of six residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed when:1. For Resident 1, Hydralazine Hydrochloride oral tablet (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) was not administered on April 18 and 19, 2026; and2. For Resident 2, Metoprolol Succinate Extended-Release (ER) oral tablet (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) was not administered on May 2 and 3, 2026. There were no documented blood pressure (B/P) parameters indicating the need to hold Resident 1 and 2's blood pressure medication resulting in incomplete medical records.Findings:1. On May 5, 2026, at 11:20 a.m., resident 1 was observed lying in bed, awake and alert. In a concurrent interview with Resident 1, he stated he did not receive his B/P medication. He stated he did not know the reason why he did not receive his B/P medication. Resident 1 stated he informed his medication nurse that he did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policy and procedure was followed for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's request to be discharged , and the facility's referral and coordination with a placement agency were not documented in the medical records.This failure had the potential to result in an inappropriate discharge.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition), and Alzheimer's disease (a loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning).A review of Resident 1's Social Service Assessment dated December 12, 2025, indicated Resident 1 was anticipated to have a short term stay in the facility.A review of Resident 1's History and Physical dated December 13, 2025, indicated he had the capacity to understand and make decisions.A review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three residents, Resident 2, clinical findings demonstrating the necessity of inserting an indwelling Foley catheter (IFC- a thin, hollow tube inserted through the urethra into the urinary bladder to collect and drain urine) were documented in the medical record. In addition, the facility failed to initiate a care plan addressing Resident 2's use of IFC.This failure had the potential for unnecessary use of an IFC and resulted in Resident 2 having a urinary tract infection.Findings:A review of Resident 2's medical records indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included right-sided muscle weakness and paralysis following cerebral infarction (blocked blood flow to the brain).A review of Resident 2's History and Physical dated June 16, 2025, indicated the resident can make needs known but cannot make medical decisions.A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1) was monitored and supervised to prevent a fall. This failure had the potential to cause injury and harm to Resident 1.Findings: On August 21, 25, 26, 27, and 28, 2025, on-site visits at the facility were conducted to investigate a complaint regarding quality of care. On August 25, 2025, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fall, subdural hemorrhage (a pool of blood between the brain and its covering), urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection in the urinary tract), malignant neoplasm of the colon (cancer of the large intestine), and dementia (memory loss). A review of Resident 1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated a score of 15 (at risk for falls). A review of Resident 1's history and physical dated April 3, 2025, indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to make medical decisions. It also indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of 28 sampled residents (Residents 7, 10, 47, 182, and 187) received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, when: 1. For Residents 7, 10, 47, and 182, the nursing staff did not rotate subcutaneous (under the skin) insulin injection sites in accordance with the facility policy and procedures (P&P). Additionally, for Residents 7 and 47, the nursing staff did not notify the doctor when blood sugar (BS) results were below 70 in accordance with the doctor's insulin (medication to treat diabetes) sliding scale (a chart with insulin doses to maintain blood sugar levels) order; and 2. For Resident 187, the nursing staff did not monitor and document the respiratory rate as indicated in the resident's care plan on March 23, 24, and 25, 2025. These failures had the potential to compromise the resident's health and well-being. Findings: 1. During an interview on May…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of pharmacy services met the needs of the residents when three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed (Residents 94, 97, and 110) were missing documentation for the administration of controlled substance (CS, those with high potential for abuse and addiction) medications. The CS medication was signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Records (MAR) to indicate it was administered to the residents. These failures resulted in inaccurate accountability of CS medications, which had the potential for misuse or diversion. Findings: 1a. Resident 94 had a physician's order, dated April 10, 2025, for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (Norco, a potent controlled medication for pain) 5/325 mg (milligram, unit of measurement), 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for moderate - severe pain. During a concurrent interview and record review on May 6, 2025, at 10:50 a.m., with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Food and Nutrition Services staff were trained and competent to carry out the functions of the department safely and effectively when: 1. Multiple Food and Nutrition Services staff, including the Registered Dietitian, did not follow professional standards of practice using three separate steps (wash, rinse and sanitize) to clean and sanitize food contact surface. Failure to properly clean and sanitize food contact surface results in growth of microorganisms on food contact surface and could cross-contaminate food; 2. Two staff members (Cook 1 and [NAME] 2) did not know the correct concentration of the sanitizer (sanitizing solution used for sanitizing food contact surfaces); 3. A staff member (Dietary Aide 4) did not follow manufacturer's guideline time length in dipping the test strip into the sanitizer for testing the concentration of the sanitizer; 4. Multiple Food and Nutrition Services staff did not know the correct concentration of the Dishwasher sanitizer; and 5. Multiple Food and Nutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on dietary observations, dietary staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. [NAME] 2 followed the recipe when preparing an alternative meal during lunch on 5/5/25; 2. [NAME] 4 followed the recipe when preparing pureed bread during lunch on 5/6/25; and 3. [NAME] 4 folowed the recipe when preparing Buttered Carrots during lunch on 5/6/25. Failure to follow standardize recipes may result in the preparation of a meal that did not meet the physician ordered diet. Failure to follow recipes may also result in a product that is not palatable which may result in decreased meal intake in a medically vulnerable residents. Findings: A standardized recipe is a set of written instructions used to consistently prepare a known quantity and quality of food for a specific location. A standardized recipe will produce a product that is close to identical in taste and yield and nutritional value every time it is made, no matter who follows the directions (Pennsylvania University, 2024). On May 5,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate food textures was provided when two residents (Resident 15 and 81) out of two sampled residents who receives Soft and Bite-Sized diet (a diet with food texture need to chop up or pureed into small piece for residents who have limited swallowing ability) received a regular texture bread stuffing without gravy for lunch on 5/5/2025. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk of choking. Findings: A review of the facility [NAME] Spreadsheet (the document used to guide dietary staff on food items, portions, and therapeutic diet) dated on May 5, 2025, indicated, Soft and Bite-Sized diet: served puree bread stuffing with 1 ounce smooth thick gravy. On May 5, 2025, at 12:10 p.m., an observation was conducted at Trayline (a system of food preparation in which trays move along an assembly line) in the kitchen. Checking each food items were going to serve at the steam table. There was no puree bread stuffing available at the steamtable. On May 5, 2025, at 1:03 p.m., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's prescribed diet order when: 1. Heart Healthy diet was given the food item that was not consistent with the [NAME] Spreadsheet; and 2. Renal and Liberal House Renal diets were given the food item that was not consistent with the [NAME] Spreadsheet on 5/525 and 5/6/25. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' nutritional status and further compromising resident's medical status. Findings: 1. A review of the facility [NAME] Spreadsheet (the document used to guide dietary staff on food items, portions, and therapeutic diet) dated on May 5, 2025, indicated, Heart Healthy diet served seasoned Pasta. On May 5, 2025, at 12:10 p.m., during trayline (a system of food preparation in which trays move along an assembly line) observation in the kitchen. Checking each food items were going to serve at the steamtable. There was no pasta available at the steamtable. On May 5, 2025, at 12:56 p.m., an observation was conducted with Resident 66 in the dining room. Resident 66's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment, prepare, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Raw meats were holding for extended periods of time for thawing; 2. Multiple pieces of equipment that were not clean to sight and/or touch found in kitchen; 3. Multiple areas and pieces of equipment covered with dust were found in kitchen; 4. Storage shelves at dry storage did not have smooth surface; 5. Screened door at dry storage had gap; 6. Two non-dietary staff entered the kitchen without hairnets; 7. Personnel belongings found at dry storage; 8. Dry storage shared with dietary staff break room; and 9. Expired foods found at resident's refrigerator. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another with harmful effect) and foodborne illnesses (are illnesses that results from ingesting contaminated foods) for 136 of 136 sampled residents who received foods from the kitchen.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly when trash were found outside on the floor surrounding the dumpsters. In addition, the lids of the dumpsters did not close properly. This failure had the potential to attract pests. Findings: On May 5, 2025, at 8:34 a.m., an observation was conducted outside the facility at the overflow parking lot. A green waste dumpster was observed widely open with some tree branches, and cardboard inside the dumpster. A pair of used blue glove, empty beverage cans, papers outside surrounding the dumpster. On May 5, 2025, at 2:11 p.m., and 4:43 p.m., an observation was conducted outside the facility at the overflow parking lot. The green waste dumpster was observed still widely open with green waste, and cardboard inside. And some trash surrounding the dumpster. On May 6, 2025, at 8:23 a.m., an observation was conducted outside the facility at the overflow parking lot. The green waste dumpster was observed still widely open with green waste, and cardboard inside. And some trash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On May 5, 2025, at 1:57 p.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 183. Resident 183 was lying in bed, awake, alert, and able to verbalize his needs. An oxygen concentrator (a device that extracts oxygen from the air and delivers a concentrated oxygen to the patient) was observed at the bedside, with oxygen nasal cannula tubing (a thin flexible tube with two prongs that delivers oxygen through the nose) connected to the concentrator. The nasal cannula tubing was observed inside the upper drawer of the resident's nightstand. Resident 183 stated he had not used his oxygen for two weeks. He stated he felt fine without the oxygen. On May 6, 2025, at 2:03 p.m., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4. CNA 4 stated Resident 183 only used his oxygen as needed. She stated he went to the therapy today and was not sure if he had used his oxygen. CNA 4 acknowledged the oxygen nasal cannula tubing was coiled inside the top drawer of the nightstand. She stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system (a communication system that allow the resident to call for staff assistance) located in Station 2 had an adequate audible sound. This failure had the potential for the residents located in Station 2 not to receive assistance from the staff in a timely manner. Findings: On May 6, 2025, the Resident Council (a group of residents in the facility that meets regularly to address issues and concerns to improve resident satisfaction) meeting minutes for February 2025, March 2025, and April 2025, were reviewed. The minutes for March and April 2025, indicated the call lights were not answered in a timely manner. On March 6, 2025, at 2:03 p.m., the Resident Council meeting was conducted with six residents present. During the Resident Council meeting, the call-light response time for the evening shift in Station 2 was still a concern. Resident 73 stated he would get out of bed, walk to the door and yell out for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed (Residents 4, 10, 182) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications including venlafaxine (an antidepressant medication used for depression [mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness] , anxiety [human emotion charaterized by feelings of unease, worry, or fear], and panic disorder [brief episode of intense anxiety, which causes the physical sensation of fear]) and Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication for bipolar disorder [disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging for depressive lows to manic highs], depression, and schizophrenia [chronic brain disorderthat affects thinking, feeling, and behavior]) when: 1. Residents 10 and 182 were administered venlafaxine without potential adverse effect monitoring documented during use of venlafaxine; and 2. Resident 4 was administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving one of three residents reviewed (Resident 55) to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. The facility staff was made aware on April 13, 2025. This failure resulted in the delay of abuse investigation, that placed Resident 55 and other residents at risk when the Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) was not suspended immediately in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. Findings: On May 5, 2025, a review of Resident 55's record indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing)following cerebral infarction (also known as ishemic stroke, when the blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing the brain tissue to die), and aphasia (a disorder that affects the ability to speak and understand what others say). A review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented when: 1. For Resident 10, the care plan for the use of Effexor (brand name for venlafaxine, an antidepressant medication used for depression, anxiety, and panic disorder) XR (extended release, designed to release medicine slowly into the body over a prolonged period) was not initiated and developed. This failure had the potential to increase Resident 10's risk of not being provided appropriate, consistent, and individualized care. 2. For Resident 11, the care plan for the right leg edema was not initiated and developed. This failure had the potential not to be able to meet the person-centered goals and objectives for Resident 11's right leg edema and delay the necessary care and services for her recovery and discharge. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 10's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included depression. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking practices were observed and implemented for two of 12 residents reviewed for smoking, when: 1. Resident 29's cigarettes were not stored in the lock box provided by the facility; and 2. Resident 84's smoking materials (cigarettes and lighter) were not stored in the lock box provided by the facility. These failures had the potential to result in accidents or injuries to the facility residents. Findings: 1. On May 7, 2025, at 12:57 p.m., an observation was conducted with Resident 29. Resident 29 was observed in his room, sleeping in his bed. A pack of cigarettes was observed on Resident 29's nightstand open shelf, readily available. On March 7, 2025, at 1:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Activities Director (AD). The AD stated a Smoking Safety assessment is done for each resident upon admission and reviewed with nursing. The AD stated the decision whether a certain resident can smoke unsupervised or supervised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) when Resident 4 received Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication for bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia) without manufacturer specified monitoring. This failure had the potential for medications not being optimized for best possible health outcome, and increased risk for adverse effects for the residents. Finding: A review of Resident 4's admission record indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition characterized by psychotic symptoms like hallucinations/delusions and mood episodes like mania or depression). A review of Resident 4's medical record indicated she had been receiving Seroquel in various doses since February 2022. A review of Resident 4's current Order Summary Report, dated May 9,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lubricant eye drops solution was safely stored for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 186). This failure resulted in Resident 186 administering the eye drops solution without physician's order, self-administration assessement, and supervision. In addition, this placed Resident 186 at risk for unsafe medication administration and has the potential to alter the efficacy of the eye drops solution being stored at resident's bedside. Findings: On May 6, 2025, at 3: 11 p.m., Resident 186 was observed lying in bed awake, alert, oriented and able to verbalize her needs. One eye drops lubricant solution was observed on top of her overbed table. She stated her family member brought the eye drops from home. She stated she had used the eye drops for years as needed for her left eye. The eye drops lubricant solution was labeled .equate Dry Eye Relief, Lubricant Eye Drops Soothing Relief for dryness and irritation 0.5 FL OZ (Fluid Ounces…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Supervisor (DSS - the position responsible for the day-to-day operation of the dietary department), met the educational requirements as outlined in the Federal Regulation, and California Health and Safety Code. Findings: According to California Code of Regulations, Title 22: Dietetic services are defined as the provision of safe, satisfying, and nutritionally adequate food for residents with appropriate staff, space, equipment, and supplies. Staffing requirements of dietetic services are such that if the position responsible for the day-to-day management of the department is not a registered dietitian there must be a full-time person who meets specific training requirements to be the dietetic services supervisor, responsible for the operation of the food service. According to the California, Health, and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4: Qualifications of Dietary Supervisor: (b) The dietetic services supervisor shall have completed at least one of the following educational requirements: (1) A baccalaureate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three residents (Resident 1), their family member was notified of Resident 1 's room change. This failure resulted in Resident 1 's Family Member, to be unaware of Resident 1's location within the facility. Findings: On March 6, 2025, at 9:26 a.m., during an interview, Resident 1 's Family Member (FM) 1 stated the facility did not notify FM 2 when they moved the resident to different rooms. On March 6, 2025, at 12:45 p.m., during a concurrent interview and observation, Resident 1 was in her current room, sitting in her wheelchair, wearing a neck brace. She was alert and conversant. Resident 1 stated she had remained in the same room since admission. A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included neck fracture (a break in the bone) and need for assistance with personal care. FM 2 was the listed as the primary contact under the CONTACTS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three residents, Resident 1, that her open wound was assessed and treated after she informed a staff member about it. This failure resulted in the delay of assessment and treatment of Resident 1 's open wound and had the potential for the wound to become infected. Findings: On March 6 and 7, 2025, unannounced visits were conducted at the facility. On March 6, 2025, at 12:45 p.m., during a concurrent interview and observation in her room, Resident 1 was sitting in her wheelchair, wearing a neck brace. She was alert and conversant. Resident 1 stated she had wounds on her right lower leg and the dressing (a covering, often a bandage or pad, used to protect a wound and promote healing) had been changed earlier that day. Resident 1 also stated she bumped her left leg at the clinic where she had her CT scan (Computed Tomography scan- a medical imaging technique that reveal detailed images of the inside of the body) done either…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2 did not wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE - specialized clothing or equipment worn to create a barrier between healthcare workers and potential sources of infection, like blood, body fluids, or other potentially infectious materials) when she entered the room of a COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory disease) positive resident. This failure had the potential to spread COVID-19 to other residents. Findings: On March 7, 2025, at 11:22 a.m., during an observation outside Resident 2's room, there were signs by the door indicating .CONTACT PRECAUTIONS .EVERYONE MUST Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO .Put on gloves before room entry .Put on gown before room entry .DROPLET PRECAUTIONS .EVERYONE MUST .Make sure their eyes, nose and mouth are fully covered before room entry . On March 7, 2025, at 11:25 a.m., during a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was functioning for one of three residents, Resident 3. This failure resulted in Resident 3 waiting for a long time to be assisted with toileting hygiene. Findings: On March 7, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview, Resident 3 was in her room, lying in bed, wearing a neck brace. She was alert and conversant. Resident 3 stated on the evening of March 5, 2025, she pressed on her call light because she needed to be changed and she waited for a long time, about three or four hours and she was even banging on the wall, but nobody came to her until her daughter called the facility. Resident 3 stated that when the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) came to change her, the CNA informed her that her call light had malfunctioned, the light bulb outside her room was not lighting up. Resident 3 stated she was not provided with an alternative method to call out for help that night. Resident 3 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a notice of proposed discharge to one of three residents, Resident 2, when Resident 2 was discharged from the facility after being transferred to the general acute care hospital (GACH). In addition, the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an advocate for residents and families in long-term care facilities) and Resident 2's family member (FM) of Resident 2 ' s discharge from the facility. This failure placed Resident 2 at an increased risk of being discharged without having an advocate to ensure a safe and effective transition of care, or without having a clear understanding of his appeal and discharge rights. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s medical record was conducted on April 29, 2024. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to loss of oxygen to the area), hypertension (high blood pressure), depression (mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three residents reviewed, Resident 2, who was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on March 27, 2024, was re-admitted back to the facility on the first available bed. This failure resulted to a violation of Resident 2's right to be re-admitted back to the facility to the first available bed and had the potential to cause emotional distress. Findings: On April 29, 2024, Resident 2's medical record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), hypertension (high blood pressure), depression (a depressed mood or loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time), schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of symptoms such as hallucinations or delusions), and convulsions (condition in which muscles contract and relax quickly causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessments were accurate for 2 (Resident #9 and Resident #147) of 29 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility incorrectly coded Resident #147 being discharged to the hospital instead of home and did not accurately code Resident #9's level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) status. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, MDS 3.0 Completion, implemented on 12/19/2022, revealed, Policy: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan. The policy revealed, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident' functional capacity, using the RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] specified by the State. 1. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's water temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level for two of five residents reviewed (Resident 2 and 5) when the resident's and/or resident ' s representatives (RR) complained the hot water took too long to heat in their bathrooms. This failure had the potential for the residents to feel uncomfortable and affect their quality of life. Findings: On February 29, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for two complaint investigations. On February 29, 2024, at 11:02 a.m., Resident 2 was observed lying in bed receiving care from the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Resident 2 was non-verbal. On February 29, 2024, Resident 2 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (inability to move arms and legs), contractures (shortening or hardening of muscles, often leading to deformities)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1), professional standards of practice were followed when the physician ' s order for follow up appointment was not carried out on January 26, 2024. This failure had the potential for care and services for Resident 1 to be delayed. Findings: On February 20, 2024, the department received a complaint indicating Resident 1 had a follow up appointment with her spinal surgeon. The complainant indicated the day of Resident 1 ' s scheduled appointment she received notice that Resident 1 could not attend her appointment due to issues with transportation. On February 29, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for two complaints. On February 29, 2024, Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fracture of the first cervical vertebrae (bones in the neck/spine), fracture of the thoracic vertebrae (bones in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions which had the potential to result in, and/or contribute to, the worsening of a pressure injury/ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of five residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer/injury on the coccyx (base of the spine) and there were no documented skin assessments after admission. This failure had the potential to place the resident at an increased risk for pain and infection. Findings: On February 29, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for two complaints. On February 29, 2024, Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fracture of the first cervical vertebrae (bones in the neck/spine), fracture of the thoracic vertebrae (bones in the chest area of the spine), and history of falls. Review of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse involving a resident (Resident 1) and a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) to the State Survey Agency immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made. This failure had the potential to result in further abuse and harm for the resident involved. Findings: The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) received an allegation of abuse from the facility on November 8, 2023, at 4:30 p.m., when the facility reported it to CDPH. The allegation of abuse took place at the facility on November 5, 2023, at approximately 10:30 a.m. On November 15, 2023, at 9:40 a.m., during an interview with LVN 1, LVN 1 denied the abuse allegation involving Resident 1. LVN 1 stated she was not aware of the abuse allegation brought forth by CNA 1 on November 8, 2023. LVN 1 stated staff at the facility must report right away any abuse allegation to the abuse coordinator, which is the Administrator (ADM). On November 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents Responsible Person (RP; person designated as being responsible for another person's medical and financial decisions) of a change in condition and had to be admitted to the acute care hospital setting. This failure resulted in violation of Resident 1's rights. Findings: On September 08, 2023, at 4:05 p.m., the Department received a complaint, indicating Resident 1 was missing from the facility for over three days and facility did not inform the responsible person of Resident 1's transfer to acute care hospital. On September 14, 2023, at 8:48 a.m., an unannounced complaint investigation was conducted at the facility. Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included a surgical aftercare following surgery of the circulatory system. Resident 1's profile indicated Resident 1 has emergency contact persons listed. Order dated September 31,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident's safety and provide adequate supervision specific to residents with cognitive impairment, wandering behavior, and risk for elopement (leaving a facility without notice) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). In addition, the facility failed to implement safety measures to secure the main entrance door where Resident 1 exited the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1's elopement and increased the potential to expose Resident 1 to harm, accidents, injury and illnesses. Findings: On June 1, 2023, an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate one Facility Reported Incident. During a review of Resident 1's record on June 1, 2023, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other mental functions). Resident 1's history and physical dated December 9, 2022,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary dental services for one of four residents reviewed, (Resident 2), when there was no follow up dental services to address Resident 2's full set of new dentures. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to have increased pain due to poor fitting dentures. Findings: On June 19, 2023, at 12:14 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was initiated for a complaint investigation. A review of Resident 2's medical records indicated he was admitted on [DATE], and discharged on February 1, 2022, with diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia, (BPH - enlargement of the prostate gland caused by a benign overgrowth of chiefly glandular tissue that occurs especially in some men over [AGE] years old and that tends to obstruct urination by constricting the urethra), hypothyroidism, (a condition resulting from decreased production of thyroid hormones), diabetes mellitus type 2, (a chronic condition that affects the way the body uses sugar. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements for food storage and preparation were followed when: 1(a) Multiple food items stored in the dry storage area were not labeled with the name of the food item, the opened date, or use-by date; 1(b) Multiple food items stored in the refrigerator were not labeled with opened dates or use-by dates; 2. The kitchen ice machine had a yellowish-brown slimy substance located on the inside cover; and 3. The kitchen manual can opener had an accumulation of a dry reddish brown stain on and around the blade and on the base of the can opener. These failures had the potential to place the residents of the facility at risk for food-borne illness in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food in the facility. The facility census was 125. Findings: 1(a) On June 7, 2021, beginning at 8:48 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary [NAME] the following were observed in the dry storage room: - five corn flakes in a styrofoam cup - with no name of the food item and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documented evidence Advance Directive (written instruction related to the provision of health care when the resident is no longer able to make decisions) information was provided to the resident and/or responsible party (RP), for four of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 32, 75, 80, and 114). This failure had the potential for Residents 32, 75, 80, and 114, not to be able to exercise their rights to formulate an Advance Directive. Findings: 1. On June 7, 2021, Resident 32's record was reviewed. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record indicated a family member was Resident 32's responsible party (RP). The physician history and physical dated December 30, 2020, indicated Resident 32 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. The Social Service notes dated March 17, 2021, were reviewed. There was no documented evidence the facility provided information to Resident 32's RP regarding the right to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 32 residents reviewed for care and treatment (Residents 63, 75, 100, and 379) maintained their highest practicable physical well-being when the facility did not identify and assess a dark bluish skin discoloration (bruises) for Residents 63, 75, 100, and 379 in a timely manner. This failure had the potential for Residents 63, 75, 100, and 379, to not receive care and treatment for the skin discolorations and may result in a delay in the investigation to determine the cause of the skin discolorations. Findings: 1. On June 7, 2021, at 11:54 a.m., Resident 63 was observed sitting in the wheelchair, alert and conversant. Multiple dark bluish and fading skin discolorations on the resident's upper extremities were noted. On the right upper extremity there were 10 sites, and on the left upper extremity there were five sites observed. On June 10, 2021, at 10:36 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for three sampled residents (Resident 42, 24, and 115) to ensure: 1. For Resident 42, a pain assessment was conducted and non-pharmacological interventions were provided by the licensed nurse prior to administering the PRN (medication taken only as needed) Percocet (a narcotic pain medication) on June 5, 6, 7, and 8, 2021; 2. For Resident 24, a pain assessment was conducted and non-pharmacological interventions were provided by the licensed nurse prior to administering the PRN Norco (a narcotic pain medication) on June 9, 2021; and 3. For Resident 117, a pain assessment was conducted and non-pharmacological interventions were provided by the licensed nurse prior to administering the PRN Norco on May 17, 18, and 30, 2021. These failures had the potential to increase usage of pain medications which could lead to drug tolerance (reduced reaction to a drug following repeated use) resulting in ineffective pain management and diminished quality of life.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control precautions to prevent cross contamination and maintain a sanitary environment when: 1. Two Treatment Nurses were observed providing wound care to Resident 7 after the lunch meal tray was served; 2. Two staff were observed to have artificial fingernails when assisting a resident while eating and when checking the resident's meal tray; and 3. One Licensed Nurse was observed wearing gel nail polish and nail enhancements during a medication administration observation. These failures increased the risk of cross-contamination which could result in the development and transmission of infections to a vulnerable population of 125 residents. Findings: 1. On June 7, 2021, during the lunch meal observation. The following was observed: - At 12:46 p.m., Resident 7's lunch meal tray was served in his room. - At 12:48 p.m., a treatment cart (cart containing wound care supplies) was observed in front of Resident 7's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meal service in a dignified manner for one of 10 residents (Resident 66) observed during lunch when the facility did not serve the resident's lunch at the same time as her roommate (Resident 36) while both residents were inside the room. This failure resulted in Resident 66 watching her roommate eat before she was served, which had the potential to cause feelings of decreased self worth. Findings: On June 7, 2021, at 12:20 p.m., the lunch meal service was observed in the hallway. The lunch meal cart arrived at Nurse's Station 2 and two licensed nurses checked the meal trays. On June 7, 2021, at 12:23 p.m., Resident 36 was wheeled inside room [ROOM NUMBER], and served the lunch meal. Resident 66 was observed in bed in an upright position, awake, staring at Resident 36 while she was eating. Resident 66 did not receive her meal at the same time as Resident 36. On June 7, 2021, at 12:25 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was safe to self-administer medications, for one resident (Resident 60) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This failure had the potential for Resident 60 to self-administer medications unsafely. Findings: On June 8, 2021, at 2:51 p.m., Resident 60 was observed lying in bed, alert, and conversant. One bottle of Eye Relief (eye drop medication to treat dry eyes) was observed on top of Resident 60's bedside drawer. During a concurrent interview, Resident 60 stated she used eye drop medication when her eyes were dry. Resident 60 stated the nurses were aware she had the eye drop medication at her bedside. On June 8, 2021, Resident 60's record was reviewed. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The recapitulated physician order for May 2021, was reviewed. There was no physician order for the eye drop medication and no order to self-administer medication for Resident 60. On June 9, 2021, at 1:32…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 8), the professional standard of practice was followed when there was missing documentation to indicate nasal iodophor 10% antiseptic (a substance that stops or slows down the growth of microorganisms) was administered as ordered. This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation of Resident 8's care potentially resulting in unnecessary changes to Resident 8's plan of care. Findings: On June 10, 2021, Resident 8's record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The physician's order dated May 27, 2020, indicated, .Apply nasal iodophor 10% antiseptic single swab to each nostril routine cycle . unless allergic, every day and evening shift every two weeks on Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri for prophylaxis (measures designed to preserve health and prevent the spread of disease) . The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for March and April 2021, indicated to administer the nasal swab on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 328) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) was provided with nail care. This failure resulted in Resident 328 to not receive services for proper grooming and personal hygiene. Findings: Resident 328 was observed with long fingernails, approximately 0.4 centimeter (cm - a unit of measurement) beyond the fingertips, with yellowish brown matter underneath all fingernails on the following dates and times: - June 7, 2021, at 12:29 p.m.; - June 8, 2021, at 9:01 a.m.; - June 9, 2021, at 2:21 p.m.; and - June 10, 2021, at 8:14 a.m. On June 10, 2021, at 9:46 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 stated yes, her fingernails are long and need to be trimmed. CNA 1 stated Resident 328 was assigned to her care yesterday (June 9, 2021). CNA 1 stated she did not perform fingernail care yesterday. On June 10, 2021, at 9:48 a.m., a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on safe smoking practices for three of 19 residents (Residents 1, 51 and 115) reviewed for smoking when: 1. Resident 1's smoking materials were not kept in a locked box. 2. Resident 51 smoked in his own patio and not in the designated smoking area; Further, he used oxygen at night and as needed during the day; and 3. Resident 151 did not have a smoking apron on while smoking, and was unsupervised by facility staff while smoking. These failures had the potential to increase the residents' risks for smoking related injuries and accidental fires. Findings: 1. On June 8, 2021, at 12:30 p.m., a concurrent observation with interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated, he smoked, and he kept his lighter and cigarettes with him. On June 8, 2021, at 12:35 p.m., an observation was conducted in Resident's 1's room. A No Smoking Oxygen in Use, sign was noted on the entry doorway. Resident 1's roommate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was being followed for the therapeutic diet on June 7, 2021, during lunch meal observation when: 1. Resident 16, who was on a double portion regular texture NAS (no added salt) diet did not receive an orange or melon slice as indicated on the menu; and 2. Resident 36 who was on a regular puree (regular diet modifies in texture of a smooth and moist consistency and able to hold its shape. Foods usually in soft and smooth state such as pudding or mashed potatoes) diet did not receive egg noodles and parsley flakes as indicated on the menu. These failures had the potential to result in compromising the medical and nutritional status of Residents 16 and 36. Findings: 1. During the lunch meal observation on June 7, 2021, beginning at 12:37 p.m., Resident 16's meal tray was served to him in his room. Observed on his meal tray were the following: - two rolls of bread, one cup of coffee; - two cream packets; - two packets of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food to meet the individual needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 380) reviewed for nutrition, when Resident 380 was served a puree (regular diet modified in texture to a smooth and moist consistency and able to hold its shape. Foods usually in a soft and smooth state such a spudding or mashed potato) diet for breakfast, lunch and dinner on June 9, 2021, inconsistent with the physician's diet order. The facility failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 380's intake which could result in compromised nutritional status. Findings: On June 8, 2021, at 3:32 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 380. Resident 380 was observed lying in bed, awake. Resident 380 stated the Speech Therapist advanced his diet to a regular diet from a pureed diet on June 7, 2021. Resident 380 stated he received a pureed diet for breakfast and lunch on June 8, 2021. Resident 380 stated he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that bedrooms measured at least 80 square (sq) feet (ft) per resident, in bedrooms occupied by multiple residents (Rooms 101, 106, 107, 112, 119, 121, 123, and 125). Findings: On May 5, 2025, during the initial tour of the facility, at 9:03 a.m., no residents reported any concern regarding the size of their rooms. Eight bedrooms occupied by multiple residents did not measure at least 80 sq. ft. per resident as required: - rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]: two residents; 156 total sq. ft.; 78 sq. ft. per resident; - rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]: three residents; 208 total sq. ft.; 69 sq. ft. per resident; - room [ROOM NUMBER]: two residents; 143 total sq. ft.; 71.5 sq. ft. per resident; - room [ROOM NUMBER]: four residents: 312 total sq. ft.; 78 sq. ft. per resident; and - rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]: two residents: 154 total sq. ft.; 77 sq. ft. per resident. On May 9, 2025, at 10:18 a.m., Resident 51 was observed entering her room in a wheelchair. In a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms measured at least 80 square (sq) feet (ft) per resident in 8 (Rooms 101, 106, 107, 112, 119, 121, 123, and 125) of 71 resident rooms in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Residents Rooms reviewed/revised on 12/19/2022, revealed, 2. Resident bedrooms will measure at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms and at least 100 square feet in single resident bedrooms. During a tour of the facility on 04/22/2024 beginning at 9:10 AM, no residents voiced any concerns regarding the size of their rooms. On 04/24/2024 at 3:00 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor measured the following rooms and confirmed the following dimensions: - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 78 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 70 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 70 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 78 sq ft for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, ten residents' bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.- a unit of measurement)) per resident, in bedrooms occupied by multiple residents (Rooms 101, 106, 107, 108, 112, 117, 119, 123, 125, and 217). These failures have the potential to have an adverse effect on the residents' health and safety, and may impede the ability of the residents in these rooms, to attain their highest practicable level of mental, physical, and psycho-social well-being. Findings: During the recertification survey at the facility on June 7 to 11, 2021, ten bedrooms occupied by residents, did not measure at least 80 sq. ft. per resident, as required: -room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 residents per room; 156 total sq. ft.; 78 sq. ft. per resident; -room [ROOM NUMBER]: 3 residents per room; 224 total sq. ft.; 75 sq. ft. per resident; -room [ROOM NUMBER]: 3 residents per room; 224 total sq. ft.; 75 sq. ft. per resident; -room [ROOM NUMBER]: 4 residents per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMUNITY CARE REHAB CENTER LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 12/22/2010 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| JOHNSON, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/06/2010 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/27/2026 |
| SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/12/1989 |
| KOCHEK, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| MADER, JORDAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/28/2023 |
| OXFORD, MICHEAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2022 |
| SHAROBIEM, ANDRO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| SMITH, PETER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/21/2021 |
| RIVERSIDE NURSING HOME ASSOCIATES TWO, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2025 |
| FARRALES, MARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055409. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.