No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Extended Care Hospital Of Riverside

8171 Magnolia Avenue, Riverside, CA 92504 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (951) 687-3842 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (951) 687-3842 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4130 Adams St, Ste B
Pharmacy
8280 Magnolia Ave · (951) 687-1308 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3550 Madison St · (951) 406-1252 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8351 Magnolia Ave · (951) 689-5700

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms21.5%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.1%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.592.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.961.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 136 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.8%CMS range 29.0–51.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.5–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge90.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.1–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.511.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.49
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
41.5%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.72 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-13)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards and to ensure resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices, for three of three residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 34, 85 and 24) when:1.Resident 34 was found to have cigarettes and a lighter at bedside. This failure had the potential to place Resident 34 and other residents at risk for harm and injuries.2.Resident 85 did not receive adequate supervision and effective fall prevention interventions.This failure resulted in Resident 85 sustaining a fall with facial injuries requiring hospital transfer. 3.Resident 24, assistance device (call light) was not within reach.This failure had the potential to result in the resident being unable to request for assistance, placing her at risk for injury.Findings: 1.On February 9, 2026, at 9:44 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 34 was conducted in her room. Resident 34 stated she smokes cigarettes with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Physician orders with parameters were followed when medications were administered without documenting the systolic blood pressure for one of three residents reviewed after medication pass observation. This failure had the potential for residents to inadvertently receive medications when they need to be held according to the physician's orders. 2. medications contained in the medication carts were not discontinued or discharged and not stored in the cart along with active residents' medications. This failure had the potential for discontinued medications to be used as not intended; 3. there was accurate accounting of Scheduled II controlled substances (federal designation of a class/classes of medications with the highest addictive potential) to minimize misuse and abuse when one dose of Resident 58's generic Norco (potent opioid used to treat severe pain) 5 mg was removed from the blister card without documentation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required information and follow up with the resident's representative (RP) regarding Advance Directives (AD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) for one of one resident reviewed for AD (Resident 6), who lacked decision-making capacity.This failure had the potential to prevent the resident's representative from participating in medical decision-making and ensuring the resident's treatment preferences were honored. Findings:A review of Resident 6's admission record dated February 12, 2026, indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses which included dementia (progressive cognitive impairment).A review of Resident 6's History and Physical dated August 5, 2025, indicated Resident 6 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 6's POLST dated December 7, 2023, indicated there was no documented AD for Resident 6.A review Resident 6's Quarterly Social Service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer and failed to provide a written bed-hold notice to one of three residents reviewed for discharges (Resident 111) and or the resident representative at the time of transfer to the hospital.These failures had the potential to deny the resident the right to be informed of transfer and bed-hold rights, including the right to reserve and return to a bed. Findings:A review of Resident 111's admission Record dated February 13, 2026, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver (irreversible liver damage).A review of Resident 111's History and Physical dated December 8, 2025, indicated the resident had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions.A review of Resident 111's Physician Progress Note dated December 18, 2025, indicated, .patient's family recently expressed concerns that she needs a paracentesis (a medical procedure in which a needle is inserted into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) and referral for one of three residents reviewed for PASARR (Resident 5) when the resident was admitted with documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder and psychosis and was not referred to the State-Designated Authority (SDA) for a PASARR Level II evaluation. This had the potential to prevent a determination of the resident's need for specialized mental health services and prevented incorporation of PASARR recommendations into the resident's comprehensive care plan. Findings:On February 11, 2026, Resident 5's record was reviewed. Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified psychosis (loss of contact with reality) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder). The document titled, History and Physical, dated December 4, 2025, indicated .Medical History .psychosis .has fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. The PASARR Level I,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and assess an intravenous (IV - intravenous catheter inserted into the vein to deliver fluids and medication) site for one of one resident reviewed for parenteral (administered by injection) fluids (Resident 124) according to facility policy.This failure had the potential to result in undetected IV-related complications including infection, infiltration, or inflammation of a vein.Findings:A review of Resident 124's admission Record dated February 12, 2026, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis which included urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection in the urinary tract).A review of Resident 124's History and Physical dated February 3, 2026, indicated resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions.A review of Resident 124's Physician Orders dated February 13, 2026, indicated an order for Ertapenem (a broad-spectrum antibiotic used to treat serious bacterial infections) 500 milligrams (mg - a unit of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications that required refrigeration were not stored outside of the refrigerator at room temperature. This failure had the potential for residents to receive ineffective medications.On February 10, 2026, at 12:40 p.m., during an inspection of the medication cart (Cart 1) located at Nursing Station 1, there was an amber bottle containing approximately 80 ml (milliliter, unit of measurement) of gabapentin (medication to treat seizure) 250 mg (milligram, unit of measurement) per 5 ml solution for Resident 55. The gabapentin bottle had an auxiliary label that indicated, Refrigerate. During a concurrent interview, LN 16 confirmed the bottle was stored in Cart 1 at room temperature and stated it should have been in the medication refrigerator. The facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Storage, effective, December 19, 2022, was reviewed, and it indicated: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a diet in accordance with physician's orders for one of 19 residents reviewed during dining observation (Resident 14), when the resident, who had a documented allergy to nuts was served a brownie containing nuts.This failure placed the resident at risk for an allergic reaction.Findings:On February 9, 2026, at 12:32 p.m., Resident 14 was observed eating in the dining room. Resident 14 was served a dessert brownie which contained nuts.Resident 14 stated he did not want to eat the brownie because it contained nuts and further stated he had an allergy to nuts. Resident 14 stated he would not eat anything containing nuts because he would react in a bad way and could developed seizures (convulsions).A review of Resident 14's tray card indicated, .Allergies: Peanuts and Tree Nuts .A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician-ordered therapeutic diet (a diet ordered by a physician as part of resident's medical treatment to manage a disease or condition) was followed for one of 19 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 90), when the resident was not provided the ordered minced and moist diet texture at lunch on February 12, 2026. This failure had the potential to result in decreased nutritional intake and increased risk for choking due to the resident's dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Findings:On February 12, 2026, at 12:40 p.m., Resident 90 was observed in the dining room being assisted by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 with CNA 2. Resident 90 stated he was not able to chew the chicken breast because it was spongy. Resident 90 stated he could only suck on the chicken and could have finished the meal if it had been a softer consistency. CNA 1 stated the meal served as soft and bite-sized and stated the resident's diet should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements for food storage and preparation were followed when one expired 12-ounce Tabasco sauce was found in the dry storage room readily available for use. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk for food-borne illness in a medically vulnerable population of 82 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. Findings:On February 9, 2026, at 8:35 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour, one 12-ounce bottle of Tabasco sauce was observed on a dry storage shelf readily available for use. The bottle was labeled with an open date of October 26, 2025, and a manufacturer's best-by date of December 2025, which had expired. During a concurrent interview with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the DSS stated the sauce should have been discarded. The DSS stated there was potential for food borne illness if the expired product were used. On February 12, 2026, at 2:27 p.m., the Registered Dietician (RD) was interviewed. The RD stated expired food items should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State survey agency within two hours for two of five residents, (Residents 2 and 3).This failure had the potential for a delay in the investigations and interventions to prevent further incidents of abuse. Findings:On December 9, 2025, at 10:14 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate an allegation of physical abuse. A review of Resident 2's medical record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and pressure ulcer injury stage 4 (PUI - full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle).A review of Resident 2's History and Physical dated September 22, 2025, indicated resident was not capable of understanding and making decisions.A review of Resident 3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment were provided for four of seven residents reviewed (Residents 1, 4, 5, and 6) when:1. For Resident 1, the licensed nurses did not timely assess and monitor the resident who experienced a change in condition on June 16, 2025. This failure resulted in the hospitalization of Resident 1 on June 20, 2025, with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (an infection that occurs in any part of the urinary system [how the body gets rid of extra water and waste]). 2. For Residents 4, 5, and 6, peripheral intravenous (IV - administration of fluids or medication through the vein) sites were not documented as assessed or changed for the duration of the admission. This failure had the potential to place Residents 4, 5, and 6 at risk for infection and injury due to prolonged use of the same IV access.Findings: 1 . On July 10, 2025, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a significant change in condition and refusal of treatment for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential for further confusion, aggressive behaviors, and refusal of care, and led to discomfort with the potential for complications related to untreated infection.Findings: On July 10, 2025, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including toxic encephalopathy (a condition of chemical imbalance in the blood) and urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection that occurs in any part of the urinary system [how the body gets rid of extra water and waste]). A review of Resident 1's Care Plan dated March 26, 2025, indicated, .the resident has impaired immunity .the resident will remain free from infection through the review date.the resident will not display any complications related to immune deficiency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within two hours after the allegation was made, for one of six sampled residents (Resident A). This failure had the potential to result in psychosocial harm to Resident A and other residents in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident A's admission record indicated, Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (inflammation of the bone tissue). A review of Resident A's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated May 9, 2025, indicated Resident A had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - [screener for mental and cognitive status] score of 12 (moderate cognitive impairment). A review of Resident A's Social Service Progress Note, dated May 27, 2025, at 3 p.m., indicated, .This resident (Resident A) is alert able to make needs known .On 5/27/25 [sic] This resident believes ithad been 8 or 8:30 pm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) Level I screening accurately reflected the presence of diagnosed mental disorders for one of three sampled residents (Resident A). This failure had the potential to result in the inappropriate admission of residents who may not meet the criteria for nursing facility placement, and in the resident not receiving the appropriate services for their diagnosed mental health conditions. Findings: A review of Resident A's admission Record indicated Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (mental disorder) and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident A's PASARR Level 1 screening, dated May 20, 2025, indicated .Level 1 negative for SMI (serious mental illness) .Section III- SMI .Does the individual have a serious diagnosed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a post discharge follow-up was conducted and documented in the medical records for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 1's safety and well-being by not ensuring post-discharge needs were met. Findings: A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included left tibia (leg bone) fracture and type 2 diabetes mellitus (abnormal high sugar). Resident 1 was discharged on January 22, 2025. A review of Resident 1's History and Physical, dated September 5, 2024, indicated he had capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary, dated January 21, 2025, indicated, .LCD (last cover day) 1.21.25 (January 21, 2025) D.C. (discharge) 1/22/25 (January 22, 2025) at 11:00am, to address (provided) . A review of Resident 1's NOTICE OF PROPOSED TRANSFER/DISCHARGE, effective date of January 22, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed, for one of four residents (Resident 1), to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTC Ombudsman - an advocate for residents to protect residents' rights and ensure quality care) received timely notification of Proposed Transfer/Discharge (a planned or suggested move of a resident from a healthcare facility to another location) when Resident 1 was discharged on January 31, 2025. This failure has the potential to result in Resident 1 lacking an advocate to protect their rights and ensure an appropriate and safe discharge plan. Findings: Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including esophageal cancer (a rare cancer that occurs when cells in the esophagus is a muscular tube that moves food and liquids from the throat to the stomach mutate and grow out of control). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical, dated October 14, 2024, indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff discussed the decisions and the rationale regarding issues or concerns raised by the Resident Council (a group of residents who come together to discuss concerns, make suggestions, and advocate for improvements in their living environment). This failure had the potential to feel that their voices were not heard which could result in dissatisfaction and a decline in quality of life. Findings: On January 22, 2025, at 5:25 p.m., during an interview with Resident 1, she stated the dining room/activity room closes at 7 p.m. and reopens at 9 a.m. Resident 1 further stated the access to the patio and vending machine is only available thru the dining room. On January 22, 2025, at 5:40 p.m., during an interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, he stated the dining room closes at 6:15 p.m. and the key is held by the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS). On January 22, 2025, at 5:40 p.m., during an interview with the Dietary Service Supervisor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess for self-administration of medication for 1 (Resident #93) of 1 sampled resident that expressed a desire to self-administer medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, dated 12/19/2022, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #93 on 11/05/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of atelectasis (complete or partial collapse of a lung). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/09/2024, revealed Resident #93 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to submit a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) following a newly diagnosed mental disorder for 1 (Resident #45) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, revised 12/18/2023, indicated, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. The policy specified, 9. Any resident who exhibits a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition will be referred promptly to the state mental health or intellectual disability authority for a Level II resident review. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #45 on 10/14/2022. According to the admission Record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screening accurately reflected the presence of diagnosed mental disorders for 1 (Resident #23) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, revised 12/18/2023, indicated, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. The policy specified, 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. a. PASARR Level I- initial pre-screening that is completed prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 (Resident #85) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for ADLs. Specifically, staff failed to assist Resident #85 with facial hair grooming and nail care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Grooming a Resident's Facial Hair, dated 12/19/2022, indicated, It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with grooming facial hair to help maintain proper hygiene as per current standards of practice. A facility policy titled, Nail Care, dated 12/19/2022, revealed, 3. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis. 4. Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided on a regular schedule. Nail care will be provided between scheduled occasions as the need arises. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #85 on 10/09/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide tube feeding formula as ordered to 1 (Resident #85) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, Resident #85's order directed staff to provide Isosource 1.5 (a type of tube feeding formula that provided 1.5 calories per milliliter) to the resident at a rate of 60 milliliters (mL) per hour for 16 hours per day, but staff provided Fibersource HN (a type of tube feeding formula that provided 1.2 calories per mL) instead, which created a potential for weight loss and for the resident's nutritional needs to not be met. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Appropriate Use of Feeding Tubes, revised 12/19/2022, indicated, It is a policy of this facility to ensure that a resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #85 on 10/09/2024 and most recently admitted the resident on 12/12/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store a nebulizer mask between uses for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Nebulizer Therapy, revised 02/23/2024, revealed the section titled, Care of Equipment specified, 1. Clean after each use. 2. Wash hands before handling equipment. 3. Disassemble parts after every treatment. 4. Rinse the nebulizer cup and mouthpiece with sterile or distilled water. 5. Shake off excess water. 6. Air dry on absorbent towel. 7. Once completely dry, store the nebulizer cup and the mouthpiece in a storage bag. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #7 on 11/10/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of pneumonia. Resident #7's care plan included a focus area, initiated on 11/26/2024, that indicated the resident had shortness of breath related to a cough. An intervention dated 11/26/2024 directed staff to administer DuoNeb (ipratropium-albuterol; a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain was treated after a request for an ordered as needed (PRN) pain medication for 1 (Resident #210) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for pain management. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pain Management, dated 12/19/2022, indicated, The facility must ensure that pain management is provide to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. The policy specified, 1. In order to help a resident attain or maintain his/her highest practicable level of physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the facility will: a. Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain and identify circumstances when the pain can be anticipated. b. Evaluate the resident for pain and the cause(s) upon admission, during ongoing scheduled assessments, and when a significant change in condition or status occurs. c. Manage or prevent pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 12/14/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of colostomy malfunction. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/06/2024, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident had an ostomy. Resident #5's care plan included a focus area, initiated 10/08/2024, that indicated the resident was on EBP related to a history of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL; a type of enzyme causing some antibiotics to be ineffective in treating bacterial infections). The care plan indicated the goal was to prevent/reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) through the use of gowns and gloves while caring for residents at high risk for MDRO transmission at the point of care during specific activities with the greatest risk for MDRO contamination of health care personnel's hands,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the complaint can be substantiated that the facility failed to ensure the temperature was between 71- and 81-degrees Fahrenheit for 46 of 96 residents. This failure caused residents to be uncomfortable and had a potential for heat related illnesses in a vulnerable population. Findings: On September 6, 2024, at 5:58 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility on a complaint investigation was initiated. On September 6, 2024, at 6:13 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director, (MAD). The MAD stated that earlier this morning approximately midnight, he was called in due to a breaker fuse going bad. The MAD stated that the generator power went on, and they have been working on replacing the fuse all day. On September 6, 2024, at 6:15 p.m., an observation of room temperatures was conducted with the MAD: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] (has two residents)- 82 degrees Fahrenheit; b. Rooms 25 (has three residents), 26 (three residents), 27 (three residents), 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to weigh two of three residents reviewed (Resident A and Resident B), on admission and every week for the first four weeks, to establish a baseline weight. In addition, there was no consistent weight changes monitoring conducted for Resident B. These failures had the potential to result in delayed provision of treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, for Residents A and B. Findings: On June 10, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility for an allegation of quality of care and treatment. A review of Resident A ' s medical record indicated, Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Type II Diabetes Mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), Sepsis (a life-threatening complication from an infection), and Alzheimer ' s (set of symptoms memory impairment, thinking skills, behavior changes). A review of Resident A ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's water temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level for one of three residents reviewed, (Resident 1) when the resident's and/or resident ' s representatives (RR) complained the hot water took too long to heat in their bathrooms. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to feel uncomfortable and affect their quality of life. Findings: On May 3, 2024, at 11:54 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility on a complaint investigation was initiated. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm (a cancerous tumor), of the lung, secondary malignant neoplasm of brain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus type 2 (a chronic condition that affects the way the body uses sugar. The body either resists the effects of insulin — a hormone that regulates the movement of sugar into the cells — or doesn't produce enough insulin to maintain normal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure maintenance and repairs were performed timely for three of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, and 3), when: 1. The bathroom wall for Residents 1 and 2, had missing drywall, and the open areas of the wall were observed to have brown and black speckled particles; 2. The wall beside the resident ' s closet for Residents 1 and 2, was missing drywall and the baseboard under the closet was warped; and 3. The bathroom baseboard was lifted and pulling away from the wall, near the toilet for Residents 2 and 3. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents ' psychosocial well-being, potentially expose Residents 1 and 2 to mold growth, and had the potential for Resident 2 and 3 to be at risk for skin tears. Findings: On January 11, 2023, at 10:10 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a physical environment complaint. On January 11, 2023, at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove the indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder allowing urine to drain freely into a bag outside your body), for one of three sampled resident (Resident A), as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in the resident having an indwelling catheter without an indication for its use and increasing the risk of having a urinary tract infection (when bacteria gets into the urinary tract [body's drainage system for removing urine]. Findings: On October 17, 2023, at 1:15 p.m., Resident A was observed in her room with an indwelling catheter draining yellow urine. A review of Resident A's record indicated Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included right ankle fracture (broken joint between the food and the leg). A review of Resident A's physician order dated October 5, 2023, indicated: - Indwelling catheter: Foley Catheter .Change for blockage, leaking, pulled out, excessive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The ice machine was not cleaned and sanitized properly per manufacturer's guidance; 2. Three various sizes of cooking pans, readily available for use, had a dry and heavy black substance buildup on the cooking surfaces, and 3. Several various size of metal pans were stacked and stored wet. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food from the kitchen in the facility. The facility census was 79. Findings: 1. During the kitchen initial tour on June 6, 2022, at 10:15 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated the ice machine located in utility room. She stated dietary staff was responsible for exterior cleaning of the ice machine and ice scoop daily, and the Maintenance department was responsible for the deep cleaning for the ice machine monthly. During an observation on June 6, 2022, at 10:21 a.m., the ice machine had visible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for the therapeutic diet (a diet that is usually a modification of a regular diet. It is modified or tailored to fit the nutrition needs of a particular person. It could be a part of the treatment of a medical condition and normally prescribed by a physician) during the lunch meal on June 7, 2022, when: 1. 11 residents (Residents 4, 32, 38, 40, 45, 46, 49, 76, 79, 85, and 86) with CCHO (consistent carbohydrate) diet (a diet used in the treatment for diabetes) received one serving of dessert cake instead of a half serving; 2. Two residents (Residents 54 and 63) with Mechanical Soft texture diet (a diet with food texture modified into a soft, chopped, or ground consistency for person who has chewing or swallowing difficulties) received four ounces (oz.) of grinded roast beef instead of three oz., and 3. Three residents (Residents 5,13, and 18) with meal tickets (a ticket including resident's diet, date, allergies, specific food and beverage items, dislikes, likes) showed three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-10 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a policy and procedure on Foods For Residents From Outside Sources that included provisions on facility providing education and information about safe food handling practices to residents, family and visitors, and provisions on facility providing training to all facility personnel regarding safe food handling practices who are involved in preparing, handling, serving, or assisting the resident with meals or snacks. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable population of 67 out of 79 residents who could consume food and receive food from family or visitors. Findings: During an interview on June 6, 2022, at 3:12 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 1 stated the facility has allowed the family or visitor to bring in food for residents. She stated when the family or visitors brought in food for resident, nurses were responsible to check for the food if appropriate for the physician's ordered diets. RN 1 stated the facility preferred them to bring in prepackaged food but ok with home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed for two residents reviewed to ensure that quality care was provided when: 1. For Resident 73, during medication pass observation, the facility staff failed to do hand hygiene in between picking dropped equipment from the floor and medication preparation. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination; and 2. For Resident 141, the facility failed to follow doctor's order to perform intake and output monitoring. This failure had the potential to cause fluid overload. Findings: 1. Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (one sided paralysis). On June 9, 2022, at 10 a.m., during medication pass observation, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4) dropped the thermometer she was holding. LVN 4 picked thermometer from the floor and placed it on the cart without sanitizing. The LVN 4 was observed pouring liquid medication UTI-STAT (is a concentrated liquid medical food .formulated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: 1. One medication, Diabetic Tussin- (used to relieve coughs caused by the common cold, bronchitis, and other breathing illnesses), was stored in the medication cart at station 2, in a drawer without a verified pharmacy label. This failure had the potential for the resident to receive medication without a physician order. 2. The refrigerator temperature in the medication refrigerator at station two was documented at 73 degrees on June 1, 2022, and 48 degrees on June 2, 2022. This failure had the potential for medication to become ineffective and unstable. Findings: 1. On June 8, 2022, at 11:33 a.m. a bottle of Diabetic Tussin 30/40 milliliters (unit of measurement) was observed in the medication cart on Station 2. In a concurrent interview with LVN 5, she confirmed the medication did not have a verified pharmacy label on it. A review of a facility policy titled, Medications brought to the facility by a resident or family member dated September 2019, indicated the following: Medications brought into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the antibiotic prescribed by the physician was adjusted after the culture and sensitivity result (A culture is a test to find germs (such as bacteria or a fungus) that can cause an infection. A sensitivity test checks to see what kind of medicine, such as an antibiotic, will work best to treat the illness or infection) of wound does not show the antibiotic (Vancomycin-is an antibiotic used to treat infections) to be sensitive. This failure had the potential to cause adverse event like antibiotic-resistant organism from inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: On June 6, 2022, at 3:14 p.m., Resident 84 was observed in her wheelchair with ongoing IV (intravenous) antibiotics through a pump (machine use to administer medication). A review of Resident 84's record, indicated, Resident 84 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, diabetes (high blood sugar) and cellulitis (deep infection of the skin) of right lower limb. In a concurrent record review and interview with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, and sanitary environment when one staff member was observed entering and exiting a room in the yellow zone (persons under investigation for COVID-19) without following the proper sanitary precautions, and one staff member did not prevent the potential for cross contamination when a medication tray was placed on the sink in the bathroom while performing hand hygiene. These failures had the potential to result in the development of an unsafe and unsanitary environment to a vulnerable resident population. Findings: 1. On June 6, 2022, at 11:13 a.m., the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 was observed to enter into room [ROOM NUMBER]B located in the yellow zone without donning (putting on) or doffing (taking off) personal protective equipment (PPE - gown, gloves, face shield, and N95 face mask). CNA 4 was observed to be wearing goggles and a N95 face mask only. CNA 4 proceeded to grab a water pitcher from a bedside table and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLCAlameda, CA 1 of 5Crescent City Care CenterCrescent City, CA 1 of 5French Park Care CenterSanta Ana, CA 1 of 5North Valley Nursing CenterTujunga, CA 1 of 5Tarzana Health And Rehabilitation CenterTarzana, CA 2 of 5Blythe Post Acute LLCBlythe, CA 2 of 5College Vista Post-AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Cottage Crest Post AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Diamond Ridge Healthcare CenterPittsburg, CA 2 of 5Gordon Lane Care CenterFullerton, CA 2 of 5Heritage ManorMonterey Park, CA 2 of 5Spring Valley Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 2 of 5Sunny Hills Post AcuteLa Mirada, CA 2 of 5Torrey Pines Post Acute And RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Trabuco Hills Post AcuteLake Forest, CA 2 of 5Villa Del Sol Post AcuteBellflower, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Healthcare Center, LLCAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Bonita Hills Post AcuteLa Habra, CA 3 of 5Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterRiverside, CA 3 of 5Country Oaks Care CenterPomona, CA 3 of 5Courtyard Care CenterSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Knolls West Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 3 of 5Menifee Lakes Post AcuteSun City, CA 3 of 5Mission Carmichael Healthcare CenterCarmichael, CA 3 of 5Paramount Convalescent Hosp.Paramount, CA 3 of 5Pelican Ridge Post AcuteNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Sunset Manor Conv HospEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Vineland Post AcuteNorth Hollywood, CA 4 of 5Garden Park Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 4 of 5Las Vegas Post Acute & RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ocean View Post AcuteEscondido, CA 4 of 5Park Regency Care CenterLa Habra, CA 4 of 5Pomona Vista Care CenterPomona, CA 4 of 5Sierra View Care CenterBaldwin Park, CA 4 of 5Vista View Post AcuteVista, CA 5 of 5Alcott Rehabilitation HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Citrus Nursing CenterFontana, CA 5 of 5Del Mar Convalescent HospitalRosemead, CA 5 of 5Excell Health Care CenterOakland, CA 5 of 5Mission Care CenterRiverside, CA

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
F & B HEALTHCAREOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/25/1993
JOHNSON, FRANKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/25/1993
DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
FARRALES, MARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
KOCHEK, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
ELLSWORTH, ADAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2022
OXFORD, MICHEALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2022
PANCHAL, PRAVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2018
UBANI-UKOMA, OBIOMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/19/2022
RIVERSIDE NURSING HOME ASSOCIATES, LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2025
SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICESOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/12/1989

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 42%Medicare 28%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$445per resident / day
operating cost
$13,520per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$478per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056162. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next