Ocean View Post Acute
1980 Felicita Road, Escondido, CA 92025 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (760) 741-6109 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.91 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.14 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 261 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 91.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 216 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.3%CMS range 51.0–60.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.4%CMS range 6.3–11.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 91.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 85.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 89.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 6.5–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 106.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent accidents for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) who has left sided hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness). Resident 1 was left unattended in bed while she was turned on her left side and the bed raised in a high position.As a result, Resident 1 fell off the bed and sustained a femoral neck fracture (fractured hip), which required surgical intervention.Findings:During a record review, the undated Facility admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (a form of paralysis that causes loss of movement to one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, generalized muscle weakness, lumbago with sciatica on the right side (pain which radiates from the lower back and travels down the left buttock, thigh, leg and feet),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the facility following a visit to the emergency department.This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive continuity of care and violated his right to return to the facility per the facility's policy.Findings:According to the facility's admission Record, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included aphasia (a disorder which affects a person's ability to speak or understand speech) following cerebral infarction (a stroke).During a record review, the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 3/28/26 indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess thinking skills) of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.A review of the document titled Interdisciplinary Care Conference dated 3/31/26 indicated, Discharge plan.Patient is homeless, does [sic] not have a dc [discharge]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed when staff did not wear a gown for residents (47, 52 and 306) with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - involves gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents [example: residents with chronic wounds and medical devices and with history of multidrug-resistant organism- MDROs]). These failures had the potential for cross contamination, spread of infection and residents' decline of health. Findings: 1. Resident 47 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA - a bacteria that does not respond to antibiotics), per the facility's admission Record. On 6/2/25 at 10:05 A.M., an observation of Resident 47's room was conducted. A plastic sign indicating EBP was posted outside the entrance to the room. On 6/2/25 at 10:40 A.M., an observation was conducted as Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan (detailed plan with information about a patient's treatment, goal, and interventions) related to: A. Anticoagulant (blood thinner) therapy for Resident 47, B. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - involves gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents [example: residents with chronic wounds and medical devices]) practices when providing care to residents on EBP (Resident 47 and Resident 52), and, C. Dialysis (a process to remove waste from the blood for residents with kidney disease) access care of Resident 52. These failures had the potential to not meet the goals of treatment and needs of Resident 47 and Resident 52. Cross reference to F 757, F 880 and F 698. Findings: A. Resident 47 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included contracture (stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) of lower legs and on long term use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice when: 1) A Licensed Nurse (LN) did not provide instructions related to an inhaler medication usage. 2) A LN did not follow physician's orders related to an insulin time of administration. These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' medical status. Cross Reference to F 759. Findings: 1) A record review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 307 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). A record review of Resident 307's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 5/29/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 which meant Resident 307's cognition (thought process) was moderately impaired. On 6/4/25 at 8:30 A.M., a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 21. LN 21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two persons assist when safely transferring a resident using a mechanical lift (a device used to safely transfer residents who cannot independently bear weight), for one of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 52). This failure had the potential for Resident 52 to have accident and fall that could lead to injury. Findings: A review of Resident 52's admission Record indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury). A review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/15/25, Resident 52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, ability to recall) score of 5/15, (0 to 7 suggests severe impairment). Resident 52's functional abilities of the MDS indicated Resident 52 required maximum assists for transfer. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per physician's order for one of two residents reviewed for oxygen use (Resident 28). This failure had the potential to worsen Resident 28's breathing and respiratory system (organs and tissues that enable breathing and gas exchange). Findings: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include pulmonary fibrosis (damaged lung tissue), pulmonary edema (fluid in the lung), and respiratory failure (when the respiratory system cannot provide adequate gas exchange), per the facility admission Record. A concurrent observation and interview with Resident 28 was conducted on 6/2/25 at 10:52 A.M. Resident 28 was in bed, with a nasal cannula (a hollow tubing for oxygen delivery) under her nose. The oxygen concentrator was set at three liters per minute (LPM). Resident 28 stated she did not use oxygen at home prior to arriving at the facility, and she planned to return to her home after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (a process to remove waste from the blood for residents with kidney disease) assessments were consistently and accurately completed for one of three sampled dialysis residents (Resident 52). These failures had the potential for miscommunication between the facility and dialysis center and to affect the continuity and quality of care of Resident 52. Findings: A review of Resident 52's admission Record indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included kidney disease, per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/15/25, Resident 52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, ability to recall) score of 5/15, (0 to 7 suggests severe impairment). The special procedures of the MDS indicated Resident 52 was on dialysis. A review of Resident 52's physician's orders, dated 3/31/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of medication management was conducted when: 1. A consent for a medication was not updated with the current dosage, and all behaviors were not being monitored for medication effectiveness (Resident 22), and 2. Potential adverse effects of an anticoagulant (a medication which prevents blood clots) were not evaluated (Resident 47). These failures had the potential for the residents to experience adverse effects or receive unnecessary medication. Findings: 1. Resident 22 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease (a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior), per the facility admission Record. An interview was conducted with Resident 22 and a family member (FM 1) on 6/2/25 at 12:15 P.M. FM 1 answered questions for Resident 22, and stated he made decisions on her behalf. FM 1 stated he was having trouble getting the nurses to provide a medication at the best times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 5.1 percent. Two medication errors out of 39 opportunities were observed during the medication administration process for two of five randomly observed Residents (154, 307) . These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' medical health and condition. Cross Reference F 658. Findings. 1) A record review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 307 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). A record review of Resident 307's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 5/29/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 which meant Resident 307's cognition (thought process) was moderately impaired. On 6/4/25 at 8:30 A.M., a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus and recipes were followed for pureed foods. This failure negatively affected the nutritional value of foods prepared in the kitchen, and had the potential for residents to receive the wrong caloric intake, further compromising their medical status. Findings: A review of the pureed lunch menu for 6/4/25 showed a serving of pureed breadstick was to be provided to residents on pureed diets. A concurrent observation and interview was conducted with [NAME] 1 (CK 1) in the kitchen on 6/4/25, starting at 11 A.M. CK 1 placed a loaf of white bread into the food processor, added chicken broth, and blenderized the bread. CK 1 stated the facility ran out of breadsticks, so she had substituted white bread. An interview was conducted with the Registered Dietitian (RD 1) on 6/4/25 at 11:30 A.M. RD 1 stated she had not authorized the substitution of white bread for the breadstick on the pureed diets. Per RD 1, it was important to provide the exact foods listed on the menu as the nutritional value of each item was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff utilized recipes when preparing foods. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for poor intake and weight loss. Findings: A review of the 6/4/25 lunch menu was conducted. The pureed lunch menu listed pureed pesto chicken pasta, pureed breadstick and chilled steamed vegetables. An observation of food production was conducted in the kitchen with [NAME] 1 (CK 1) on 6/4/25 starting at 10:30 A.M. 1. CK 1 stated she would make pureed bread. CK 1 placed approximately eight slices of white bread into a food processor, then poured an unmeasured amount of pale yellow liquid into the food processor. CK 1 stated the pale yellow liquid was chicken broth. When asked how much chicken broth she had added to the food processor, she stated, Enough to moisten the bread. When asked where the recipe was for pureed bread, CK 1 stated she would go ask for a recipe. CK 1 returned with a recipe for pureed bread. CK 1 continued processing the bread in the food processor. CK 1 stated she had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide alternate menu options of similar nutritional value to residents. This failure had the potential to result in meals not being equal in nutritive value, and may result in weight loss. Findings: A record review was conducted of the facility's menu and alternate items list. An Always Available Menu was posted outside of the dining room, and it included cheese quesadilla and a grilled cheese sandwich. An observation of the lunch trayline was conducted on 6/4/25, beginning at 11:45 A.M. 1. At approximately 12:20 P.M., Food Service worker (FSW) 1 stepped over to the stove and placed four small tortillas into a pan. FSW 1 added a small amount of shredded cheese to each tortilla and folded them in half. FSW 1 did not use a measuring cup or scale prior to adding the shredded cheese to the pan. FSW 1 stated two of the small quesadillas counted as a portion. 2. At approximately 12:40 P.M. FSW 1 stepped over to the stove, and placed four slices of white bread into an oiled pan. FSW 1 added two yellow, square…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of an expired food product in a nursing unit refrigerator. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings: An observation of a nursing station refrigerator was conducted on 6/4/25 at 10:30 A.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 12. A prepackaged sandwich was in the refrigerator, with a label indicating it had been placed in the refrigerator on 5/31/25, and should be disposed of on 6/3/25. LN 12 stated a staff member should have thrown away the sandwich the previous day. Per LN 12, it was nursing staff responsibility to check all food items in the unit refrigerator to prevent food poisoning. An interview was conducted with Registered Dietitian (RD) 1 on 6/5/25 at 2 P.M. Per RD 1, nursing staff was responsible for checking the unit refrigerators for expiration dates. Per a facility policy, revised 9/13/25 and titled Food From Outside Sources, Food brought in by visitors, family, friends or other guests for residents is permitted allowing the resident the right to choose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the flu vaccine (a vaccine which provides immunity to a variety of influenza viruses) was provided to one of five sampled residents (Resident 69). This had the potential for putting Resident 69 at risk for acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from influenza (an acute contagious viral infection characterized by inflammation of the respiratory tract). Findings: A review of Resident 69's admission Record indicated Resident 69 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included immunodeficiency (decreased ability of the body to fight infections and other diseases). A review of Resident 69's attending physician completed Resident 69's history and physical (H&P) dated 10/26/24. The H&P indicated Resident 69 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. On 6/4/25 at 8:57 A.M., a joint review of Resident 69's clinical record and an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to a medical records request for one of two sampled patients (1). As a result, the requester did not know if the records were made available to her. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a mental and physical decline). On 2/20/25 at 2:19 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Social Worker (SW). The SW stated Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP 1) emailed her a request for medical records on 2/17/25. The SW further stated, they planned on having the medical records ready by 2/21/25 per RP 1's request. On 2/28/25 at 9:28 A.M., an interview was conducted with the SW. The SW stated, the medical records were ready to be picked up on 2/21/25, but she did not respond to RP 1's record request or notify RP 1 that the medical records were ready to be picked up. The SW stated, they received an additional medical records request on 2/24/25, and delivered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a hazardous situation when supervision was not provided for one resident (1) during an outpatient appointment and his whereabouts were unknown. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at increased risk of injury when Resident 1 was found, sitting in the sun, outside the outpatient appointment location by a bystander and sent to the hospital. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a fracture of the right femur (broken right upper leg bone) and unspecified dementia (a loss of mental functioning including, remembering and reasoning) per the facility's admission record. A review of Resident 1's physicians orders indicated, Resident 1 had an outpatient follow-up appointment with an orthopedist ( a medical specialist who focuses on injuries and diseases affecting the musculoskeletal system (bones, muscles, joints and soft tissues), on 9/5/24 at 10:45 A.M. On 9/23/24 at 2:45 P.M., an interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately discharge on e of one resident (Resident 3) with elopement risk reviewed for discharge planning when; 1. There was no documentation regarding Resident 3's elopement risk and the appropriateness of a discharge to an independent living facility and, 2. A discharge care plan was not developed. As a result, Resident 3 was readmitted to the hospital. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities) and repeated falls according to the facility's admission Record. During a review of the physician's history and physical (H&P) admission note dated 2/7/24, the H&P indicated .patient resides at Board and Care (place to live that provides food and personal care). Patient was wandering and went missing for several days. He was found by local police and brought in the hospital and placed on 5150 hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a plan of care and adequate supervision to prevent one of three residents reviewed for elopements from leaving the facility (Resident 1). As a result, Resident 1 went missing from the facility without staff ' s knowledge and placed Resident 1 at risk for harm. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (an impairment of brain function, such as memory loss and judgment) according to the facility ' admission Record. During an interview on 3/15/24, at 9:46 A.M. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated a week ago on Monday, 3/4/24 he walked out of the facility to look for a house for sale then came back. Resident 1 stated this past Monday, 3/11/24 he left the facility again when it was still dark outside and staff from the facility found him outside during the day. An interview was conducted on 3/15/24, at 10:22 A.M. with Resident 1 ' s assigned certified nurse assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party when sodium valproate (a medication that effects the mind) was discontinued for one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 ' s responsible party was not fully aware of what medications he was taking. Findings: Per the facility ' s admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a mental and physical decline), and had a designated responsible party to make his health care decisions. On 2/21/24 at 4:50 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated, the facility had to notify Resident 1 ' s responsible party for any changes in his medication. The DON further stated, they were not able to find any documentation that they notified Resident 1 ' s responsible party when sodium valproate was discontinued. Per the facility ' s Psychiatry Progress Note dated 12/26/23, .(Resident 1) unable to provide collateral information due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to apply a skin protective cream as ordered for one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 was at increased risk of skin breakdown. Findings: Per the facility ' s admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a mental and physical decline). Per the facility ' s Treatment Administration Record for Resident 1, dated 1/30/24, there was an order on 1/15/23 to, Apply barrier cream (a cream to prevent skin breakdown) .every shift for maintenance of .buttocks . In January 2024 there were 70 opportunities for staff to sign that they completed the task as ordered, and 21 opportunities were blank. On 2/20/24 at 12:23 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated, if there was a blank space on the Treatment Administration Record, it meant that the task was not done. The DON further stated, if the task was not done, the staff should have documented why. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure current infection control practices were followed when a facility employee did not wear a face shield inside a resident's room (Resident 3) who was on isolation for COVID-19 (an infectious respiratory disease). Failure to follow current infection control practices had the potential to spread infectious disease to all residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including COVID-19 according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 11/15/23, at 9:50 A.M., Resident 3's room had a, Stop sign outside, hanging under the room number. The back of the sign indicated, Droplet (spread of germs passed through speaking, sneezing, or coughing) and Contact Precautions (prevention of infection by direct or indirect contact) .Personal Protective Equipment Needed. Gown, N-95 (a fitted filtering mask), Face shield, Gloves . During observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Perform and document neurological checks (assessing mental status, level of consciousness, eye response to light, motor strength, feeling sensation, and vital signs {blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate} every 15 minutes for one hour, every 30 minutes for one hour, every hour for two hours, every two hours for four hours, every four hours for 16 hours, every 8 hours for 24 hours) after an unwitnessed fall per the nursing standard of practice for one of four residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls; and 2. Accurately score (low, medium or high risk of future falls) for a fall assessment after an unwitnessed fall for one of four residents (Resident 1), reviewed for falls. As a result, Resident 1 ' s head injury could have been detected earlier and a higher fall assessment score would have implemented more interventions to prevent future falls. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label the oxygen (O2) tubing and humidification water bottle for one of two residents (Resident 307). This failure had the potential to increase the risk of developing pneumonia and/or other infections, with an inadequately monitored oxygen delivery system. Findings: Resident 307 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Acute Respiratory Failure with hypoxia (trouble breathing with blood oxygen levels below normal), pneumonia (infection in the lungs), sepsis (severe infection), hypoxia (decreased oxygen perfusion to tissues) and pleural effusion (fluid on the outside of the lungs) per the facility admission Record. During an observation on 3/20/23 at 12:54 P.M., Resident 307 was lying on his back in bed, with his eyes closed. Oxygen was observed on Resident 307 via nasal cannula (small prongs in the nose), at 2 Lpm (liters per minute), delivered via a humidified water reservoir (humidifier) that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 8%. Two medication errors were observed, with a total of 25 opportunities, during the administration process for one of 5 randomly observed residents ( Resident 315). As a result, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered correctly to Resident 315. Findings : On 3/23/23 at 8:10 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 prepared and administered 3 medications to Resident 315 through a gastrostomy tube ( G tube, a surgically -placed device for direct access to the stomach ), which included : Amlodipine tablet 5 mg, one tablet (used to treat high blood pressure ) Gabapentin 300 mg, one tablet ( used for nerve pain) Metoprolol tablet 25 mg, one tablet (used to treat high blood pressure) LN 1 crushed each medication, and placed them into separate 30 milliliters (ml) medication cups. LN 1 added 20 ml of water to each cup and administered the crushed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the Notice of Transfer or Discharge form to the Ombudsman, when residents were discharged from the facility for three of three sampled residents (13,91,95). As a result, there was a potential for residents to not have access to an advocate who could inform them of their options and rights related to transfers and discharges. Findings: 1. Resident 95 was admitted on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. Resident 95 was transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 5/31/19, and on 7/21/19. On 8/15/19 at 10:42 A.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with the SSD. The SSD was not able to find a copy of a Transfer/Discharge Notice form in Resident 95's record. The SSD stated, nursing was responsible for the completion of the form and should send the form to the Ombudsman. The SSD stated she did not notify the Ombudsman when a resident was transferred to a general acute care hospital. On 8/15/19 at 10:54 A.M., a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed- hold, upon transfer to the GACH, for four of four sampled residents (13, 91, 95, 98). As a result, these residents' did not have information to accept or decline a bed-hold during their absence. Findings: 1. Resident 95 was admitted on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. Resident 95 was transferred to a GACH twice, on 5/31/19, and on 7/21/19. On 8/15/19 at 10:54 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated Resident 95's Bed Hold Informed Consent form, dated 5/16/19, was not completed when Resident 95 was transferred to a GACH on 5/31/19. The DSD stated Resident 95's Bed Hold Informed Consent form, dated 6/5/19, was not completed when Resident 95 was transferred to a GACH on 7/21/19. The DSD stated licensed nurses should have completed the bed- hold form and provided a copy of the form to Resident 95, or Resident 95's responsible party, upon transfer. On 8/15/19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, unspecified (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other mental functions) per the facility's admission Record. On 8/14/19 at 9 A.M., Resident 5 was observed in the hallway, in her wheelchair, muttering to herself. On 8/15/19 at 3:30 P.M., Resident 5 was observed in the activity room, in her wheelchair, looking through a magazine. On 8/14/19 at 3:40 P.M., a review of Resident 5's medical record was conducted. No care plan for dementia was located. On 8/14/19 at 3:43 P.M., a concurrent interview and review of Resident 5's medical record was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated there was no care plan for dementia care. Additionally, the DSD stated, We usually do one (care plan) for the behaviors associated with dementia. On 8/14/19 at 4 P.M., an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated, A care plan is important to identify risks for hurting herself and if current treatment is working. Based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans that reflected resident preferences and needs for: 1. Three of six residents (42, 59, 60) sampled for activities, and; 2. One of five residents (60) sampled for communication needs. These failures had the potential to affect the residents' care and treatment. Findings: 1. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included a cerebral infarction (stroke) and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), per the facility's admission Record. On 8/12/19 at 9:43 A.M., an observation of Resident 42 was conducted. Resident 42 was lying in bed with her eyes closed, calling out help, help, help, please. The lights were off in the room. On the dresser, a white and blue sock were hanging from the second drawer handle and a red and white sock was hanging from the third drawer handle. There were no activities at the bedside, no music or television was on and there were no decorations on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Label and date glasses of liquids, soup bowls of liquids, remove a watermelon with fuzzy brown spots, and cover cut celery from the walk in refrigerator; 2. Remove a dented can of peaches from the storage area; 3. Remove ice cream in the walk in freezer which was soft. As a result, there was a potential for food borne illness if expired or unsafe food was served to residents. Findings: 1. During the initial observation of the kitchen on 8/12/19 at 8 A.M., there were 17 glasses and 19 soup bowls, in the walk in refrigerator, on trays. The DSS 1 stated she did not know all foods and liquids had to be marked with the contents. On 8/12/19 at 8:15 A.M., during a concurrent observation with the ADM in the walk in refrigerator, there was a watermelon which had brown indented spots. The ADM stated, This needs to be removed. On 8/12/19 at 8:20 A.M., in the walk in refrigerator, there was a large plastic bin which contained 6 stalks of celery, all of which had cut ends, and wilted leaves. The DSS 1 stated she did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on oberservation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date resident food stored in one of two nursing station refrigerators. As a result, there was a potential for food borne illness if expired or unsafe food was served to residents. Findings: On 8/12/19 at 3:34 P.M., the pantry in Nurses' Station 3 was opened. The refrigerator contained, 7 undated health shakes. The RD 1 stated, the healthshakes were supposed to have an expiration date. They were received frozen, and once thawed, they were to be used within 7 days. The drawer of the refridgerator contained a wrapped plate of food, which the RD identified as chicken tenders. There was no date or identification label on the wrapped plate. Per the notice on the refrigerator door on Station 3, Refrigerator for residents use ONLY food needs to be dated discard after 72 hours. Per the label on the health shake container, Storage and handling Store Frozen. Thaw under refrigerations. After thawing, keep referigerated. Use within 14 days after thawing.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were stored in a secured location. This failure had the potential for residents' private medical information to be viewed by non-medical staff, other residents, and visitors. Findings: On 8/14/19 at 9:24 A.M., an observation was made in the dining room. A cupboard, containing binders with resident medical information was observed, unlocked. No staff were present in the dining room. On 8/14/19 at 9:25 A.M., an observation, interview and record review was conducted with RNA 1. During the observation, Resident 66 entered the dining room and DA 39 was in the dining room setting the tables. RNA 39 stated the cupboard contained: A binder labeled RNA weekly meeting minutes -which contained weekly RNA meeting notes about residents. A binder labeled RNA Treatments Station 1- which contained a list of all residents residing on Station 1 receiving RNA, their weekly summary, their physician's order for RNA, their physical therapy referral form and their restorative treatment record. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (a system to monitor antibiotic use). This failure had the potential to increase the risk of adverse events from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: A concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the ICN on 8/15/19, at 2 P.M. A binder labeled Antibiotic Stewardship was reviewed and only two antibiotic surveillance sheets were present. The ICN stated this is not complete, we just introduced it. Additionally, the ICN stated, The residents get the antibiotic if the physician orders it. We don't call and discuss criteria for antibiotic usage. There is pushback from family and physicians. An interview was conducted with the ICN on 8/15/19, at 2:15 P.M. The ICN stated, It is important because residents should be treated correctly; the purpose is to reduce antibiotic use; it is not really an effective program. A joint interview was conducted with the ADM and DON on 8/15/17, at 2:30 P.M. The DON stated, We acknowledge that the program is not where it needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a tile floor in good repair when tiles were chipped and missing, in 1 of 2 shower rooms. As a result, there was a potential for residents' feet to be cut in the shower room and there was a potential for a trip hazard. Findings: On 8/13/19 at 4:41 P.M., the tiles in the shower room at Station 3 were observed. More than eight tiles were missing or broken, some with sharp edges. On 8/13/19 at 4:45 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the MTD. The MTD stated, the tiles could cause cuts on residents' feet and should be replaced. On 8/13/19 at 5 P.M., an interview was conducted with the MTD. The MTD stated he did not have a work order request in the Maintenance/Housekeeping Log. Per the facility policy, Environment of Care, Keeping Resident's Room in Order, dated 8/9/19, . (1) A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment .(i) This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to code the MDS correctly, for one of 19 sampled residents (81). As a result, there was a potential to affect the provision of care, and provided inaccurate information to the Federal database. Findings: Resident 81 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. The MDS, dated [DATE], for Resident 81 was reviewed on 8/12/19. Per section N of the MDS Insulin use (injection to control blood sugar), A. Insulin Injections-Record the number of days that insulin injections were received during the last 7 days . Recorded on 7/25/19 was the number 7. On 8/12/19 at 3:30 P.M., the MDS Nurse stated Resident 81 was not diabetic (high blood sugar level), and therefore not on insulin. The MDS Nurse stated she made a mistake. Per the facility policy, Certification of accuracy of the MDS, dated [DATE], .Purpose .Legally, it is an attestation that to the best of your knowledge, the information you entered on the MDS accurately reflect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide a method of communication, in a residents' preferred language, for three of three residents (53, 59, 60) sampled for communication. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' ability to effectively communicate with facility staff. Findings: 1a. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included legal blindness (impaired ability to see), per the facility's admission Record. Per the MDS, dated [DATE], Resident 53's preferred language was [NAME], and Resident 53 required a translator to communicate with health care staff. On 8/13/19 at 3:58 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with CNA 41. Resident 53 was lying in bed. CNA 41 stated Resident 53 spoke Korean, that there were no Korean speaking care givers in the facility, and if Resident 53 spoke to her, she would have asked the nursing supervisor to call his family and translate. On 8/13/19 at 4:18 P.M., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide person-centered, in-room activities that met the needs and preferences for three of five residents (42, 59, 60) sampled for activities. This failure had the potential to cause decreased quality of life. Findings: 1. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included a cerebral infarction (stroke) and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), per the facility's admission Record. On 8/12/19 at 9:43 A.M., an observation of Resident 42 was conducted. Resident 42 was lying in bed with her eyes closed, calling out help, help, help, please. The lights were off in the room. A white and blue sock hung from the second drawer handle of the dresser, and a red and white sock hung the third drawer handle. There were no activities at the bedside, there were no decorations on the wall, the television was off and there was no music. On 8/12/19 at 11:05 A.M., an observation of Resident 42 was conducted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate urinary catheter (a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine) care was provided to one of three residents (53) sampled for catheter care. This failure placed Resident 53 at risk for a urinary tract infection (bacteria in the urine). Findings: Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (loss of bladder control due to nerve damage), per the facility's admission Record. The MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 53 was totally dependent (required staff to perform all aspects of care) on facility staff for catheter care. Resident 53's catheter care plan, dated 7/15/19, was reviewed. Interventions included positioning the catheter bag (urine collection bag attached to the catheter) below the level of the bladder. On 8/13/19 at 3:58 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with CNA 41. Resident 53 was lying in bed on his right side. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a CNA acted within their scope of practice when operating an enteral (through a tube inserted into the stomach) feeding pump (machine used to deliver liquid nutrition) for one unsampled resident (53). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 53's nutritional status and well-being. Findings: Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), per the facility's admission Record. The physician's order, dated 6/30/19, indicated Resident 53 was to receive an enteral feeding. The MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 53 was totally dependent (required staff to perform all aspects of care) on facility staff for nutrition. On 8/12/19 at 8:20 A.M., an observation of Resident 53 was conducted. Resident 53 was lying in bed with his eyes closed. An enteral feeding pump (EFP), turned off, was at the bedside. On 8/12/19 at 3:14 P.M., an observation of Resident 53 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess the needs of one of three residents with dementia (5). This failure had the potential for Resident 5 to not achieve the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, unspecified (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other mental functions) per the facility's admission Record. On 8/14/19 at 9 A.M., Resident 5 was observed in the hallway, in her wheelchair, muttering to herself. On 8/15/19 at 3:30 P.M. Resident 5 was observed in the activity room, in her wheelchair, looking through a magazine. On 8/14/19 at 3:40 P.M., a review of Resident 5's medical record was conducted. There was no comprehensive nursing assessment for dementia and no behavior monitoring. On 8/14/19 at 3:43 P.M., a concurrent interview and review of Resident 5's medical record was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), per the facility's admission Record. On 8/13/19, at 9:04 AM, an observation was conducted in Resident 7's room. A plastic bag with unknown contents was on the floor of Resident 7's closet. On 8/13/19 at 4:18 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 41. LN 41 examined the contents of a plastic bag on the floor in Resident 7's closet. LN 41 stated the bag contained a cleansing enema set. LN 41 stated the cleansing enema set should not have been in Resident 7's closet because it was a medication. On 8/13/19 at 5:05 P.M., an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated a cleansing enema set required a physician's order, should be kept locked in a medication cart and should be administered by licensed nurses. The DON stated the cleansing enema set should not have been in Resident 7's closet. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure appropriate urinary catheter (a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine) care was provided to one of three residents (53) sampled for catheter care. This failure placed Resident 53 at risk for a urinary tract infection (bacteria in the urine). Findings: Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (loss of bladder control due to nerve damage), per the facility's admission Record. The MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 53 was totally dependent (required staff to perform all aspects of care) on facility staff for catheter care. Resident 53's catheter care plan, dated 7/15/19, was reviewed. Interventions included positioning the catheter bag (urine collection bag attached to the catheter) below the level of the bladder. On 8/13/19 at 3:58 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with CNA 41. Resident 53 was lying in bed on his right side. A catheter bag was hung from the side rail on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESCONDIDO POST ACUTE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/19/2023 |
| GONCALVES, FATIMA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/10/2022 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/19/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555427. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.