No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crescent City Care Center

1280 Marshall Street, Crescent City, CA 95531 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (707) 464-6151 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (707) 464-6151 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)3 actual-harm citations$144,866 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (80) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $144,866 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-21)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
515 E Washington Blvd · (707) 460-1802 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
835 Northcrest Dr · (707) 457-5340 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1981 Northcrest Dr · (707) 464-1903 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.5%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.1%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.9%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication2.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.3%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table45.3%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.0%93.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.4%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.7%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.232.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.361.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
36.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 36.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 56% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.1%CMS range 32.5–50.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.6–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge36.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified83.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.1%CMS range 6.6–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
1.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
68.7%
Total nursing turnover
88.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 84.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-27)
28
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

80 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 67 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 28 and Resident 15) and one discharged resident (Resident 233) who were at risk for falls and had a history of falls, were provided with supervision by direct care staff, and had effective revisions and implementation of their nursing care plans to prevent further falls to keep them safe. Facility policies on safety and management of falls were not followed. As a result, Resident 28, Resident 15 & Resident 233 suffered falls with major injuries at the facility. This may have contributed to Resident 233's death, and Resident 28's dramatic decline, as she is now expected to pass away within 6 months. In addition, 2 of 24 sampled residents suffered falls without major injuries (Resident 227 and Resident 51), due to lack of supervision, creation, revision, and implementation care plans to prevent falls. This had the potential to result in injuries with major injuries, including death to the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Record review indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Dementia (Memory loss) and Heart Failure (Inability for the heart to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) according to the facility Face Sheet. During a dining observation on 6/10/24 at 1:03 p.m., Resident 25 had just finished eating, and was observed leaving the social dining room. Resident 25 had consumed approximately 10% of her lunch meal. Resident 25 appeared extremely thin and frail, with merely skin covering her bones. Record review of a facility document titled, Weights and Vitals Summary, indicated Resident 25's weights were the following: 12/05/23: 110.1 lbs. 1/04/24: 100.6 lbs. (Weight loss of 8.6%) 2/06/24: 100 lbs. 3/04/24: 92 lbs. (Weight loss of 8% in 28 days, 16.43 % weight loss since 12/05/23) 4/08/24: 91.3 lbs. 5/06/24: 88.9 lbs. (Weight loss of 11.6 % in 4 months, since 1/04/24) 6/11/24: 87.5 lbs. (Weight loss of 20.5 % in 6 months, since 12/05/23) Record review of the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Findings: Multiple observations, interviews and record reviews (Reference Federal Tags F550, F674, F584, F641, F656, F657, F658, F677, F687, F695, F710, F725, F761, F791, F800, F801, F804, F812, F835, F842, F865, F867, F868, F880 and Substandard Quality of Care Federal Tags F689 & F692) during the recertification survey conducted from 6/10/24 at 8:45 a.m. to 6/24/24 at 4:48 p.m., demonstrated the facility's actions, inactions and decisions, contributed to a facility in which residents were seriously harmed (F689 & F692), residents were not treated with dignity and respect (F550 and F584), residents did not receive the care and services they needed (F677, F687, F791 & F725), meals were not palatable, stored or prepared in a sanitary manner (F800, F804 & F812), medications were not stored properly (F761) and resident care plans were not created or revised (F657 & F658). In addition, despite inadequate staffing levels, they continued to accept new residents (F725 & F550). During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/21/24 at 5:01 p.m., the QAPI (Quality Assurance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a certified nurse assistant (CNA 1) disregarded the resident's right to refuse care and showered her despite her clear refusal.This failure resulted in a diminished sense of dignity and autonomy for Resident 1, causing anger, frustration, and anxiety, undermining her trust in caregivers, and creating the potential for psychological trauma and future reluctance to accept necessary care.A record review of Resident 1's admission Record (facility demographic), indicated her admission to the facility on 1/24/23 from an acute care hospital with diagnoses including but not limited to the following: muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent and irrational worry, fear, or dread), post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a terrifying or life-threatening event), and claustrophobia (an intense irrational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) received treatment and care in accordance with the resident's goals of care and professional standards when Resident 2's skin treatment ordered by the physician was not provided for 11 days of the month. This failure had the potential to result in worsening of the skin condition and leaving the skin unprotected and broken rendering it susceptible to secondary infection. Findings:A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bleeding between the brain and its surrounding membrane, heart and lung failures, and other infectious diseases (illnesses caused by tiny organisms-such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasites).A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/3/26, indicated Resident 2 was admitted with one unstageable pressure sore (UTD - a deep,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the California Department of Public Health (the Department) within the required timeframe for one of two residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not report an allegation of abuse involving Resident 1 within two hours after the allegation was made.This failure had the potential to result in the allegation not getting investigated timely, and can result in physical, mental, or psychosocial harm to the residents. Findings:A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — widespread
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring oxygen were provided humidifiers (bottled water that attaches to an oxygen concentrator and moistens the oxygen, preventing dry nose and throat), clean concentrators (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to people with breathing-related conditions by pulling in ambient air, filtering out nitrogen, and delivering purified oxygen) and orders for therapy for 13 of 15 residents (Residents: #18, #20, #23, #22, #25, #31, #40, #41, #98, #48, #55, #76, #81) observed receiving oxygen therapy when thirteen residents did not have humidifiers in use as required for their oxygen delivery systems, seven residents had visibly soiled or dirty oxygen concentrator filters, and eleven residents did not have physician orders for oxygen therapy, despite actively receiving oxygen during the survey.These deficient practices placed residents at risk for inadequate humidification, ineffective oxygen delivery,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, staffing was not sufficient to meet the needs of thirteen Sampled Residents (Resident #6, Resident #29, Resident #55, Resident #9, Resident # 35, Resident #86, Resident #53, Resident #3, Resident # 34, Resident 54, Resident 81, Resident #5, and Resident #67 when:There was no staff assistance with dining for Sampled Residents #9, #86 and #35 and resulted in no lunch eaten by all three residents; and Sampled Resident #86 was not turned every two hours. Staff did not provide activities of preference for Sampled Resident #34, did not provide nail care for Residents #6, #29. #55, #54 and Resident #81, and did not get Resident #81, Resident #5 and Resident #67 out of bed.Sampled Residents #3, #6 and #53 were observed to not have call lights lights within reach on multiple occasion.These failures had the potential to result in:Resident potential for or worsening of malnutrition for Resident 9, Resident 86, and Resident 35, and a potential for development of skin issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a census of 87 residents with a well balanced diet that met their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, while honoring individual food preferences when:The facility did not maintain current and complete dietary preference documentation, as only 5 of 87 residents had documented preferences; and The facility did not provide staff with accurate and up to date diet order information, as dining room staff relied on a diet roster that was two weeks outdated.These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for decreased meal satisfaction, leading to reduced intake and missed therapeutic diets, potentially resulting in medical complications.1. During a record review of the facility's 85 lunch tray tickets dated 3/24/26, only five of the tray tickets had documented preferences.2. During an observation on 3/23/26 at 12:08 p.m., in the main dining room, one facility staff member was observed walking around the dining room offering residents hot drinks such as coffee or tea and another staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services department for a census of 87 residents when the Dishwasher (DW) operated the dishwashing machine at 108 degrees Fahrenheit and could not identify the required operating temperature or describe how to test for chlorine sanitation.This failure had the potential to affect the facility's ability to maintain effective sanitation practices for all residents and to cause foodborne illnesses in a vulnerable resident population.During an interview on 3/25/26 at 10:33 a.m., with the DW, the DW stated he was a new employee and remained in training. The DW could not specify the temperature at which the dishwashing machine should operate. The DW also could not describe how to test for chlorine sanitation. During an observation on 3/25/26 at 10:37 a.m., the DW operated the dishwashing machine, and the temperature gauge showed 108 degrees Fahrenheit.During an interview on 3/26/26 at 5:30 p.m., with the Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure an effective system was in place to accurately identify and communicate residents' food allergies, preferences and substitutes for a census of 87 residents when the facility's tray tickets listed residents' allergies under the dislikes section rather than under a clearly defined allergies designation, and preferences were not assessed, documented on meal tickets or honored for three residents (Resident 35, Resident 86, and Resident 89). This failure placed residents at risk for exposure to allergens due to staff's inability to reliably identify and accommodate allergy restrictions, and left residents frustrated due to their preferences not being honored. During an interview on 3/23/26 at 9:15 a.m. Resident #35 stated he did not get what he needed for breakfast. He stated he told someone and he still didn't get it. He stated he needed raisin bran cereal with two non-sugar sweeteners and more milk. He said they kept bringing him oatmeal and he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a census of 87, when:Several food items were found in the walk-in refrigerator past their use by dates;Several food items were found in the dry storage area past their use by dates;The scoop was left in the large bin container which stored the flour;Facility provided snacks were found in the resident refrigerator past their use by date; andFacility provided snacks were found in the resident refrigerator without date labels.These failures had the potential to contribute to the spread of foodborne illnesses among a vulnerable resident population.1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/23/26 beginning at 8:34 a.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the following items were found inside the Walk-In Refrigerator with the following marked dates: a 32 ounce container of Liquid Whole Eggs with a use by date of 3/22; a half gallon container of soy sauce with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-27 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store resident food in a safe and sanitary manner for a census of 87 when staff stored several perishable food items unlabeled and undated in the facility pantry designated for resident food.This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a vulnerable resident population.During an observation on 3/24/26 at 8:23 a.m. in the clean utility room, which contained cabinets designated for resident personal food items, one clear plastic scalloped edge bowl containing three large porous pieces of bread sat directly on the cabinet shelf. The bread remained unprotected and exposed to the environment because the container was uncovered. At the same time and location, one large red and white commercially wrapped food item rested on the same shelf approximately two inches from the uncovered bread. The paper wrap, marked in large black lettering JACK CHEESEBURGER, did not include a room number or a date indicating when staff received it.During an interview on 3/24/26 at 8:28 a.m., with Unlicensed Staff H (US…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 67 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-27 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all responsibilities of the Medical Director were effectively performed to ensure resident attained and maintained the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being when the Medical Director did not fulfill his responsibility for the coordination of medical care in the facility. This failure resulted in Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR) not being addressed and communication between the Medical Director and care teams being ineffective which could result in delayed resident care, unnecessary medication use, and potentially poor resident outcomes. During a phone interview, on 3/24/26 at 11:19 a.m., with Guardian A (legal decision maker for Resident #4 and Resident #14), she stated she felt like she had to pester Medical Director with repeated phone calls and requests to speak with him about the medical care for Resident #4 and Resident #14. She stated he would seldom call her back. She stated he was unresponsive and it made her angry because she could not speak to him on behalf of the residents she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that essential kitchen equipment was in safe operating condition for a census of 87 residents when:1. The low temp dishwashing machine was operated at 108 degrees Fahrenheit multiple times; and2. A food thermometer was not readily available for use.These failures had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to maintain effective sanitation practices for all residents and increase the risk of serving food that had not been verified to be at a safe temperature.1. During an observation on 3/25/26 at 10:37 a.m., the Dishwasher (DW) operated the low temp dishwasher multiple times, and the temperature gauge showed 108 degrees to 110 degrees Fahrenheit.2. During a concurrent interview and observation on 3/25/26 at 10:59 a.m. with the [NAME] (CK I), CK I was calibrating the food thermometers per facility policy and observed the thermometer was not reading the required temperature of 212 degrees Fahrenheit as it was immersed in boiling water. The CK I confirmed the temperature was reading at 203…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to honor the rights of three residents (Resident 81, Resident 34 and Resident 54) out of twelve residents sampled for Advanced Directives (ADR), when they neglected to provide the Resident's and/or their representatives with a consultation upon admission to the facility. This failure had the potential to result in the resident's wishes for life sustaining treatment during an emergency not being honored. A review of Resident 81's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of history of breast cancer, repeated falls, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis ( diseases causing decrease in bone density and pain in joints), and Bipolar Disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized by intense, alternating mood swings between extreme high energy (mania or hypomania) and deep depression). A review of Resident 81's clinical record indicated no POLST ( Physicians orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) or ADR ( Advanced Directives)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two allegations of abuse were reported to the Department within the required timeframe for three of 38 sampled residents (Resident 12, Resident 84 & Resident 99) when:The facility did not report an allegation of abuse involving Resident 99, and;The facility did not report a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident 12 and Resident 84.These failures had the potential to result in delayed identification and intervention regarding abuse, increased risk to resident safety, and noncompliance with regulatory reporting requirements, potentially compromising the well-being and protection of vulnerable residents within the facility. A review of Resident 99's admission Record (facility demographic) indicated Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and passed away on 3/13/26. A review of the Social Services Progress Note dated 2/03/26 at 9:08 a.m., indicated the facility was made aware of an allegation relayed by Life Partner 1 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered nursing care plans for two of two sampled residents (Resident 26 and Resident 43), related to:Lack of post-fall care plan interventions for Resident 26,Repeated medication refusals by Resident 26, and;Resident 43's fluctuating psychosocial (define) and behavioral patterns, including prolonged bed stay and limited activity participation.These findings may have resulted in Resident 26 being placed at increased risk for additional falls, injuries, or even death. The lack of appropriate interventions could have contributed to ongoing medication refusals, which may have worsened Resident 26's chronic health issues. Additionally, these deficiencies may have led to physical deterioration for Resident 43, such as muscle weakness, joint stiffness, pressure sores, and a heightened risk of infection due to prolonged bed rest.A review of Resident 26's admission Record (facility demographic) indicated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of six sampled residents (Resident 26, Resident 54 and Resident 81) remained free of accidents when they did not received adequate supervision to prevent falls, resident-centered nursing care plans were not developed prior or after the falls, post-fall assessments or neurological checks (rapid nursing assessments to detect brain injuries or spinal issues after a fall) were not completed, and interdisciplinary team meetings (IDT) were not held to identify the root cause of the falls.These failures could have resulted in serious harm or injury to the residents, including increased risk of falls, potential physical trauma, prolonged recovery times, and diminished quality of life. Additionally, the lack of proper supervision, individualized care planning, and post-fall assessments may have prevented the facility from identifying and addressing the underlying causes, thereby increasing the likelihood of future incidents. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' nutritional needs were recognized and evaluated upon admission for four out of six sampled residents (Resident 20, Resident 31, Resident 78, and Resident 79) when the clinical record for each resident lacked evidence of a nutritional assessment completed at or shortly after admission as required to identify weight history, diet orders, allergies, swallowing risks, and nutrition related diagnoses.This failure resulted in delayed evaluation of dietary requirements, risk factors, and nutritional status for four residents and placed them at risk for unmet nutritional needs, delayed therapeutic diet implementation, and decline in nutritional status.A review of Resident 20's admission record indicated he was last admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer and Orthopedic Aftercare Following Surgical Amputation.A review of Resident 20's initial nutritional assessment indicated the assessment was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain was adequately assessed, monitored, and managed for two of 38 sampled residents (Resident 26 & Resident 64) who suffered from high levels of pain.These findings may have resulted in the residents experiencing untreated or undertreated pain, delayed recognition of injury, decreased comfort, and reduced functional ability.A review of Resident 26's admission Record (facility demographic) indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a significant decline in memory and thinking abilities that disrupt daily activities), history of falls, and difficulty walking. Record review of a nursing progress note dated 3/19/26 at 2:20 a.m. indicated Resident 26 was found on the floor next to the bathroom door. A small bump was noted to the right side of the head, and Resident 26 was unable to state how the fall occurred. Record review of Resident 26's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 3/19/26 at 6:16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility did not engage in a program to prevent or minimize adverse consequences related to medication therapy for five Residents (Resident #86, Resident #4, Resident #78, Resident #5, and Resident #81), when there was a lack of documented engagement and response between Pharmacy, Nursing and Medical Director for the Monthly Medication Review. This failure had the potential to lead to ineffective management of resident medications and ineffective communication among the resident care team. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 4:15 p.m., with DON (Director of Nursing), the Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) Request Binder document indicated the following Pharmacist Recommendations: Resident #4 GDR requests on 5/25, 6/25, 2/26 were not documented as either agree or disagree by Medical Director. Resident #86 GDR requests 5/25, 6/25, 7/25, 9/25 with discontinuation of medications, were not documented either agree or disagree by Medical Director. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented as required for six of six sampled residents (Resident #7, Resident #12, Resident #41, Resident #45, Resident #69) when:Ten missed hand hygiene opportunities were identified during medication pass observations, in which licensed nursing staff did not perform hand hygiene before or after resident contact and before medication preparation or administration, and;A Licensed Nurse failed to change gloves after contact with soiled materials during a tube feeding medication pass, when she handled a soiled towel and then proceeded to administer medications without removing gloves and performing hand hygiene.These deficient practices had the potential to contribute to the spread of infections among a vulnerable resident population.During medication administration observation on 3/25/26 at 7:28 a.m., Licensed Nurse C (LN C) missed four hand hygiene opportunities when he did not use hand sanitizer before entering Resident 41's room and later picked up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an abuse allegation involving staff and one of one sampled resident (Resident 99).This failure had the potential to delay the implementation of necessary protective measures and oversight to safeguard the health and safety of Resident 99 and other residents of the facility.A review of Resident 99's admission Record (facility demographic) indicated Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and passed away on 3/13/26.A review of the Social Services Progress Note dated 2/03/26 at 9:08 a.m., indicated the facility was made aware of an allegation relayed by Life Partner 1 that Resident 99 reported two staff members were arguing, got into her face, and spit in her face.A review of Resident 99's electronic medical record (EMR) did not indicate the allegation was timely reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) or that immediate follow-up actions were initiated at the time the allegation was made.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the transfer and discharge of Sampled Resident #94 was documented in the resident's medical record, and appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution and Ombudsman (advocacy agency). This failure had the potential to cause miscommunication, inadequate care and lack of advocacy. During an interview and record review with Medical Records (MR) on 3/25/26 at 12:50 p.m., MR stated Resident #94 was admitted [DATE] and discharged on 12/29/15. She stated the Social Services note indicated he was transferred to the hospital. She stated there was no physician order to transfer, no nursing progress note, no notification to the Ombudsman, and no documentation of where the personal belongings of the resident went. She stated there should be an order from the physician.During an interview and concurrent record review on 3/25/26 at 1 p.m. DON (Director of Nursing) stated for resident transfer or discharges to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #12's enteral feeding (liquid nutrition delivered directly into the stomach or small intestine via a tube for individuals unable to eat enough by mouth to meet their nutritional needs) was administered according to the physician's order and failed to ensure the glucose solution used with the resident's enteral feeding setup was properly labeled. These failures had the potential to result in improper nutrition delivery, contamination, and adverse health outcomes. Findings:A review of Resident #12's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. An observation on 3/23/26 at 8:43 a.m., noted Resident #12's enteral feeding pump running. The Glucerna bottle label showed a start time beginning with 8, but the complete time was unreadable due to smudging. The bottle label indicated a rate of 85 mL/hr hr (milliliters/hr, the amount of fluid infusing during one hour), while the pump…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure behavioral and mental health services for one of two Sampled Residents (Resident #49). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 49's wellbeing and the potential to cause further trauma. A review of Resident 49's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder (a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and low energy) and Delusional Disorder (a chronic, rare psychotic condition defined by holding one or more fixed, false, and non-bizarre beliefs).A review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 3/4/26 indicated Resident 49 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 49's Trauma Informed Care Screener dated 2/20/26 indicated he had experienced a traumatic event.A review of Resident 49's Order Summary dated 3/27/26 indicated Resident 49 had no orders/referral for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a secure manner when 1. medications were left unattended on a medication cart, 2. loose pills were found at the bottom of multiple medication carts, 3. an open date on a medication was illegible, 4. a Licensed Nurse did not know how to dispose of wasted medications, 5. medication carts were observed unlocked and unattended on two occasions, and 6. an emergency medication kit (E Kit) was observed open and accessible. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who rely on the integrity and safety of the facility's medication supply when residents, staff and visitors could access unattended medications which could result in accidental ingestions of medications and medications getting lost and misplaced and not available for residents who need them. Findings:During an observation on 03/25/2026 at 9:15 AM Licensed Nurse (IP) was at med cart, reviewing medication packets, when IP located a packet requiring disposal, and left it on top of her medication cart while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0774 — isolated
    Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 64 could attend a much-needed medical appointment when no transportation was arranged causing the appointment to be cancelled and subsequently never rescheduled. This failure directly affected Resident 64's access to care and a pain management program.A review of Resident 64's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of person injured in an MVA (motor vehicle accident), multiple fractures of ribs, pain in unspecified joint, pain in both shoulders, muscle spasm, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).A review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 2/4/26 indicated he had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 13 with no cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 64's Social Services Progress Notes indicated no documentation concerning the missed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy and confidentiality for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2), when the facility physician conducted Resident 2's medical examination in a group setting, in front of other residents.This practice resulted in Resident 2 feeling embarrassed and unsatisfied with physician services, constituted a breach of Resident 2's confidentiality and may have adversely affected the quality of the diagnostic process. A review of Resident 2's admission Record (a facility demographic), dated 2/25/26, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including morbid obesity (an abnormally high body mass), depression (persistent, overwhelming feelings of sadness) and epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity).A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 1/27/26, indicated Resident 2 had little to no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan focused on safety and monitoring for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had reported experiencing suicidal thoughts (suicidal ideation).This finding may have resulted in failure to identify warming signs, insufficient risk reduction strategies, inadequate supervision and lack of essential safety measures, which could have contributed in Resident's suicide occurring just weeks after expressing suicidal ideation. A review of Resident 1's admission Record (facility demographic), dated 2/24/26, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients the body needs to function and the nutrients it receives), difficulty walking, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Resident 1 was [AGE] years of age.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/09/26, indicated Resident 1 had little to no cognitive (mental process of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent an elopement for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when he was observed in front of the facility without staff assistance. This failure had the potential for injury from falls and other negative impacts on Resident 1's safety and security. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated he was admitted [DATE] with Diagnoses that included Traumatic Brain Injury (Brain injury related to an accident), Muscle Weakness, Cognitive Communication Deficit (Difficulty in making needs known), Psychosis (A brain condition that results in difficulties determining what is real and what is not real), Anxiety, Insomnia (Inability to sleep or stay asleep), Bipolar (A mental disorder characterized of depression and elevated mood that may last days or weeks) and Schizophrenia (A mental disorder characterized by hallucinations, seeing things that are not there and disorganized thoughts). A review of Resident 1 ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their smoking policy for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 3), when one unlicensed staff was vaping (the action of inhaling and exhaling vapor containing nicotine and flavoring produced by device designed for this purpose) in Resident 3 ' s room. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to have vapor inhalation health consequences. Findings: During an interview on 3/12/25 at 11:11 a.m., Licensed Staff A stated the facility received a complaint that Unlicensed Staff B had been vaping in Resident 3 ' s room. Licensed Staff A stated she reported the complaint to the Administrator. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/12/25 at 2 p.m., with the Administrator, Unlicensed Staff B ' s Investigation Attestations (document the includes a description of what happened in the employee ' s own words) was reviewed. The Administrator confirmed Unlicensed Staff B had admitted to vaping in Resident 3 ' s room as indicated on the investigation attestation and signed by Unlicensed Staff B. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that meet the needs of the residents when two of four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) did not receive their medications in a timely manner. These failures were not in alignment with the facility policy and procedures and had the potential to not meet the residents' therapeutic needs which could lead to the worsening of their health conditions. Findings: 1. During an interview on 12/26/24 at 3 p.m., Resident 1 stated her medication Carbidopa-Levodopa (used to treat the symptoms of Parkinson's disease [shaking palsy]) was scheduled three times a day but would often receive them late. Resident 1 stated even today's doses were more than an hour late . Resident 1 stated she would have preferred it if nurses would give her medications on time. During an interview on 12/26/24 at 3:15 p.m., Licensed Nurse A stated medications were supposed to be administered within an hour of its schedule. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/26/24 at 5:40 p.m. with the Administrator, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner when the kitchen was found not clean, unorganized, containing expired, spoiled and moldy food items, and lacking documentation for the food thermometer calibtation log. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness and spread infections to 80 of the 81 residents living at the facility, with the exception of Resident 68, who received formula feedings (liquid nutrition delivered to the resident directly to the stomach using specialized medical equipment). Findings: During an initial observation and concurrent interview with Dietary Aid U, starting on 6/10/24 8:45 a.m., there were multiple findings in the kitchen of the facility as follows (Photographs were taken): 1. 6/10/24 at 8:46 a.m.: In the walk-in refrigerator, two strawberries that were covered with a thick layer of white mold were found. They appeared to be wrapped in a layer of soft cotton. Dietary Aid U confirmed the finding and took the strawberry box…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 15 out of 81 residents (Resident 25, Resident 68, Resident 6, Resident 12, Resident 55, Resident 29, Resident 40, Resident 35, Resident 3, Resident 65, Resident 21, Resident 46, Resident 50, Resident 2, & Resident 58) were treated with dignity and respect when: 1. The facility did not ensure Resident 25's sweater was changed after becoming soiled with food particles. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident 68 was given a timely notice, and agreed to a room change, prior to transferring him to a new room. 3. Resident 6's toenails were not trimmed for months, which caused her discomfort while wearing shoes. 4. Resident 12's soiled clothing and disposable brief were not changed for several hours. 5. Resident 55 had to wait 22 minutes sitting right next to another resident being fed, in order to be assisted with dining. By the time the other resident was finished, Resident 55's meal was cold, and had to be heated in the microwave. 6.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to provide seven of seven residents (Resident 21, Resident 6, Resident 46, Resident 50, Resident 2, Resident 58, and Resident 25) the contact information of the California Department of Public Health where they can file complaints regarding possible abuse, neglect, exploitation, amongst other possible violation of state or federal regulations. This failure left the residents not knowing and deprived them their right to be able to formally file a complaint to the State about the care they were receiving at the facility. Findings: During an interview at the Resident Council meeting on 06/11/24, at 2:40 PM, when asked if they knew how to contact the Department to file a complaint, none of the seven residents present knew how and where to contact the State. A review of the regulatory Health and Safety Code §483.10(g)(4)(i)(C)(D)(ii)(vi) The resident has the right to receive notices orally (meaning spoken) and in writing (including Braille) in a format and language he or she understands, including: Required notices as specified .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was kept free of offensive odors throughout the building. At all times of the day, an unpleasant smell which consisted of feces, urine and strong body odors permeated the air inside the facility. This finding had the potential to result in discomfort, headache, nausea, eye and nose irritations, among many other symptoms, to the residents of the facility. Findings: During an observation, while entering the building for the first time during the recertification survey, on 6/10/24 at 8:45 a.m., the smell in the hallways of the facility was almost unbearable. The odor smelled like a combination of human feces and urine, strong body odors, dirt, and grime. The hallway was covered by a dark carpet that had visible stains in several areas. During initial tour of the facility on 06/10/24, at 8:45 AM, a foul odor was noted in the North Hall. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/10/24 at 10:16 a.m., Resident 27's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment and care screening tool) for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 12) under Section K (Swallowing/Nutritional Status), by not indicating Resident 12 was on a physician-prescribed weight loss plan. This had the potential to cause errors in Resident 12's medical treatment in order for Resident 12 to maintain an ideal physician direct weight loss recommendation order below 200 pounds (160-190 pounds) and an appropriate care plan with the necessary interventions to address nutrition. This could have further caused increased debilitating conditions, affecting Resident 12's health and quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 12's admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder) and hallucinations (seeing, feeling, or hearing something that isn't there),chronic pain, borderline personality disorder (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. During initial tour and interview on 6/10/24, at 10:28 AM, Resident 127 was in bed with O2 via nasal canula dispensing oxygen at 2 LPM. There was no label on the oxygen tubing. During an observation on 6/10/24, at 5:25 PM, Resident 127 was seated in her wheelchair in the hallway across the nurses' station without oxygenation. During an observation on 6/12/24, at 12:20 PM, Resident 127 was not in her room, but her O2 concentrator continued dispensing O2 at 2LPM with the oxygen tubing and nasal canula lying on top of the bed cover. A review of Resident 127's Change of Condition Summary dated 6/7/24, indicated she had shortness of breathing (SOB) and had an O2 saturation of 77%. A review of the Physician orders dated 6/7/24, indicated Oxygen at 2-3 LPM via NC to keep O2 saturation above 92 %, check O2 saturation every shift, change oxygen tubing, humidifier bottle & clean filter as needed and one time a day every Sunday for oxygen therapy. Review of Resident 127's medical record indicated a care plan to manage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy was followed and comprehensive care plans for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 28, Resident 51) were reviewed and revised after every fall at the facility. This failure resulted in the resident's care not being reviewed by the interdisciplinary team to mitigate additional falls, and had the potential to result in low quality of care, harm and death to the residents involved. Findings: Resident 28 Record review indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including History of Falling (History of having suffered falls, which may indicate increased risk for future falls), Difficulty in Walking, and Muscle Weakness, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). 1st Fall: Record review of Resident 28's progress note dated 1/18/24 at 12:45 a.m., indicated, Responded to resident's room after a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated that the resident was observed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and follow the physician orders and facility's Protocol for Constipation for two of 23 sampled residents, (Resident 29 and Resident 33), leading to Resident 29 and Resident 33 not having a bowel movement (BM) for several days. This had the potential for Resident 29's and 33's abdomen feeling full, bloated, and in pain, hard stools causing hemorrhoids (swollen veins in your lower rectum), unexplained weight loss, amongst other health issues, which could lead to Resident 29 and Resident 33 being hospitalized . Findings: 1. A review of Resident 29's Administration Record, indicated Resident 29 was admitted [DATE], with a diagnosis of sequelae of cerebral infarction (stroke caused by disruption of blood flow to the brain), convulsions (involuntary contracture of the muscles), feeding difficulties, muscle weakness, blindness right and left eye, dementia (more confused and forgetful), psychotic disturbances (a mental disorder), anxiety, major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure seven of 23 sampled residents (Resident 232, Resident 14, Resident 67, Resident 4, Resident 12, Resident 20, and Resident 29) received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs-Activities related to personal care such as showering, grooming, toileting, etc.,), when: 1. Resident 232 was left with a soiled disposable brief for a prolonged period of time, which damaged the skin underneath severely. This failure had the potential to result in infections and development of pressure injuries, and may have contributed to the severe pain Resident 232 suffered at the end of his life. 2. Resident 14, who required assistance with ADLs was not provided with frequent incontinence care (Cleaning and drying of the genital areas of a resident with loss of bowel and bladder control) and repositioning. This had the potential to result in the development of pressure injuries, pain, shame, and feelings of distress and frustration. 3. Resident 67…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had enough staff to: 1. Promptly respond to call lights of 4 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 35, Resident 3, Resident 25, and Resident 50), and one unsampled resident (Resdient 40) causing residents to wait long periods of time. 2. To meet the ADLs (Activities of Daily Living: are activities related to personal care. They include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and assisted with eating or needing to be fed) needs of the residents, including Resident . 3. To provide prompt incontinence care (cleaning the private areas of residents with loss of bowel and bladder function) to one of 24 sampled resident (Resident 14) and discharged Resident 232. This failure resulted in: 1. Resident 35 lying in his soiled linen to get cleaned, Resident 3 burning her skin and feeling bothered, Resident 25 feeling bad and awful, Resident 50 screaming for help and getting mad, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 81 residents at the facility (Resident 41, Resident 7, Resident 28, Resident 13, Resident 45, Resident 2, Resident 29, Resident 38, Resident 23, Resident 229, Resident 128, Resident 39, Resident 227, Resident 231, Resident 6, Resident 34, Resident 16 & Resident 62) were served their prescribed diets without errors, by dietary staff when errors were noted prior to the trays being delivered to the residents. In addition, Licensed Nurses were observed checking only the trays of residents eating in the social dining room, but no Licensed Nurses were observed checking the trays of the residents eating in their rooms. These failures had the potential to result in nutritional problems and episodes of chocking for the residents involved, which could have resulted in death. Findings: During a tray line observation on 6/12/24 from 11:45 a.m. to 1:20 p.m., the Surveyor reviewed every tray ticket and compared it to the actual meal served in each tray for all residents of the facility, after dietary staff had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four kitchen staff (Dietary Aid R, Dietary Aid S, Dietary Aid T, and Dietary Aid U) were knowledgeable of the cooling process for leftover food, thawing process for frozen food, and 3-step process to manually wash, rinse, and sanitize dishware correctly. These findings had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses and spread of infections to all residents of the facility except for Resident 64, who did not eat by mouth. Findings: During an interview on 6/11/24 at 8:50 a.m., with the Dietary Manager present, Dietary Aid R was asked about the 3-step process to manually wash, rinse and sanitize dishware. According to Dietary Aid R, dirty dishes should initially be placed on a tray with soap and sanitizing solution. From there, the dishes should be placed on a second tray with water only, and no sanitizing chemicals. According to Dietary Aid R, the third tray should contain water only, no chemicals, to rinse the dishes. Dietary Aid R stated he started working for the facility in 2022, and on one occasion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on food production observation, dietary staff interview and departmental document review the facility failed to ensure staff competency during food production activities when standardized recipes were not used. Failure to utilize and follow standardized recipes may result in compromised quality and altered nutritional content of prepared meals, potentially resulting in decreased meal satisfaction, and inability of the facility to meet the nutritional needs of residents. Findings: The purpose of a standardized recipe is to ensure consistent quality, taste, texture, appearance, nutrient content, yield, and cost of a dish. Standardized recipes are important in the food and beverage industry, where precision and consistency are essential. a. During initial tour on 9/17/24 beginning at 9 a.m., Dietary Staff (DS) 1 was observed preparing the dessert for the noon meal, a peanut butter cake square. DS 1 was observed cutting a sheet pan into 77 servings, by cutting 7 servings across and 11 servings down. Each serving measured approximately 1-1/2 x 1-1/2 and ½ high. DS 1 indicated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer attractive and palatable meals to 80 of 81 residents (All residents of the facility except for Resident 68 who used formula feedings [liquid formula delivered directly into a person's stomach through medical equipment). The food was noted to be lacking flavor, and the vegetables were previously frozen and then overcooked, leading to loss of nutritive value. This failure had the potential to result in weight loss issues, malnutrition and low quality of life to the residents of the facility as food and drinks were attractive, palatable and served at appetixing temperature. Findings: During an interview on 6/10/24 at 9:58 a.m., Resident 11 stated that the food had no flavor and was often served cold. During an interview on 6/10/24 at 10:41 a.m., Resident 14 stated that the food had no flavor, was served cold, and the meals were odd in the sense that entrees that were not supposed to be served together, were served together. During an interview on 6/10/24 at 10:57 a.m., Resident 229 stated she had concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical documentation was complete and accurate for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 29) when: 1. Resident 25, who had a significant weight loss of more than 20% in 6 months, did not have complete documentation of her meal consumption for the month of May, 2024. 2. Resident 29, who had severe weight loss of 15.86% in six months, meal intake was not being monitored closely from 3/19/24 -6/19/24. These findings had the potential to result in insufficient information for the interdisciplinary team to track the care being provided to the residents, and the ability of the residents to meet their healthcare goals which could have resulted in low quality of care and harm to the residents involved. Findings: 1. Record review indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Dementia (Memory loss) and Heart Failure (Inability for the heart to pump enough blood to meet the body's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish, implement and maintain a QAPI/QAA program (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement/Quality Assessment and Assurance-A program that involves a systematic approach to quality assurance and performance improvement. It is designed to identify areas of improvement and develop strategies to improve the quality of care provided to the residents) that identified system-wide problems and reassessed the effectiveness of their interventions to correct quality deficiencies. The facility failed to maintain documentation of an effective, comprehensive and data driven QAPI program that involved the govening body and executive leadership when the person responsible for the QAPI program's development was the Director of Nursing (DON), and no QAPI meeting minutes and documentation were maintained and provided. This failure resulted in inability to correct deficiencies that resulted in substandard quality of care related to nutrition issues and falls with injuries (Reference Federal tags F689 and F692) experienced by several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective facility wide Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that included the required members for the QAPI meeting, responsible for identifying significant resident safety and care issues, and failed to ensure that performance improvement activities fully evaluated the depth and scope of the issues, developed a plan to correct identified issues, implement the plan and monitor the results of the facility plan and make changes if the plan was not effective. 1. Lack of Infection prevention input and data to monitor Hand Hygiene for staff and residents (Cross-Reference F8800. 2. Lack of monitoring of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) to ensure residents were receiving two showers a week, and the documentation appropriate and accurate (Cross-Reference F677). 3. Lack of monitoring falls in 2024, Falls with injuries: the facility had one in 4/2024, one in 5/2024, and one in 6/2024. Total number of falls: 28 (January), 34 (February), 35 (March), 12 (April), and 25 (May) (Cross-Reference F689:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and administrative document review, the facility failed to ensure it had an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program when the Medical Director or designee did not consistently attend meetings. This failure to have required committee members consistently attend meetings had the potential to result in lack of facility identification of significant resident safety issues, developing a plan to correct identified issues, implementing the plan, and monitoring the results which had the potential to affect the outcomes, dignity, and safety of facility residents. Findings: A review of the QAPI committee sign in sheets indicated QAPI meetings took place on 2/28/23, 3/23/24, 4/27/23, 5/25/23, 7/20/23, 11/30/23, 12/21/23, 1/24/24, 2/28/24, 3/28/24, 4/18/24, and 5/23/24. The Medical Director was present on 2/28/23, 4/27/23, 7/20/23, 1/24/24, and 4/18/24. The meetings lasted one-half- hour, except on 11/30/23,12/21/23, 3/28/24, 4/18/24, and 5/23/24, the QAPI meetings lasted 15 min. The Medical Director was not present at the 11/30/2023 quarterly QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced hand hygiene and encouraged resident to wash or wipe their hands with wet washcloths before and after meals when: 1. Five residents (Resident 13, Resident 64, Resident 3, Resident 9, and Resident 63) were served their lunch trays without washing or wiping their hands clean before eating. 2. None of the residents in the social dining room were observed being reminded about hand sanitation prior to their meals, or provided hand sanitation supplies. 3. Staff used the same gloves while feeding three residents at the same time and staff helped various residents with their meals without hand sanitizing in between. This failure can result in the spread of infection or an outbreak among the already frail health of the residents and staff in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/10/24, at 12:43 PM, a CNA was observed serving lunch to Resident 13 in his room. The CNA was not heard or observed to offer to wipe with a washcloth or wash the hands of Resident 13. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 51) clinical record included a physician discharge order, a completed signed Discharge Assessment and a physician Discharge Summary of Care. The lack of completed discharge documentation had the potential to result in the lack of communication between the facility, the physician, and Resident 51 and/or Resident 51's responsible party, and a potential to affect continuity of care, such as Resident 1's overall readiness for discharge, medication, activities, diet, and/or follow-up visits, which could have impacted Resident 51's continuity of care leading to an unsafe discharge to home. In addition, Resident 51's physician not completing Resident 51's Summary of Care had the potential for the next care provider to receive insufficient information to properly care for the resident, which could impact the resident's health and wellbeing. Findings: A review of Resident 51's Change of Condition Summary, dated 3/1/24, indicated Resident 51 was discharged on 3/1/24 at 12 p.m. to home,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper foot and toenail care was provided for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 6) when Resident 6's toenails had grown long and thick, Resident 6 was complaining her feet hurt when she wore her shoes and Resident 6 needed a Podiatrist to cut her toenails because they had become too thick for the nurse to cut. In addition, Resident 6's feet looked severely dry and cracked preventing Resident 6 from maintaining the highest practical level of functioning and was at increased risk for foot complications. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record, indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis including a stroke, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder), osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease) amongst others. A review of Resident 6's Quarterly MDS (minimum data set, a clinical assessment process provides a comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor one of two sampled residents (Resident 6), who was on continuous oxygen (O2) therapy (supplement O2) at 2 liters (L), portable O2 tank to make sure Resident 6's O2 tank was changed before it ran out of oxygen. This failure resulted in Resident 6's O2 tank running out of oxygen while Resident 6 was in her wheelchair propelling herself in the hallway, which could have led to Resident 6 becoming short of breath, which could have led to respiratory distress, a decline in Resident 6's health and possible hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record, indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis including a stroke, high blood pressure, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), shortness of breath, amongst others. A review of Resident 6's Quarterly MDS (minimum data set, a clinical assessment process provides a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperatures of 2 of 2 medication refrigerators (Refrigerator A and Refrigerator B) in the medication room of the facility, were within normal range to store resident insulins (Injectable medication to lower blood sugar levels) and COVID-19 vaccinations, among other medications. In addition, two expired medications were found stored with active medications in the medication room and one of the medication carts of the facility. This finding had the potential to result in medications and immunizations that were no longer effective, causing harm to the residents involved. Findings: During a concurrent medication storage observation and interview with Licensed Staff A on 6/20/24 at 11:45 a.m., the temperature of Refrigerator A (inside the medication room of the facility) was 52 degrees Fahrenheit. This refrigerator stored 8 pens of Lantus insulin (Long-acting medication to lower blood sugar levels) labeled with residents' names and a Prevnar vaccine (A pneumococcal vaccine that protects against serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide dental services for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 33) who needed to see an oral [NAME] for a revisit. This failure had the potential for Resident 33 to experience intermittent oral pain, problems with eating, speaking and infections of the mouth if Resident 33's oral surgeon appointment was missed and decrease Resident 33's optimal physical, social, mental and psychosocial well-being. Finding: A review of Resident 33's admission Record indicated Resident 33 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis including stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) affecting the left side, dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), delusional disorder (a mental disorder), bipolar disorder (a mental disorder), amongst others. A review of Resident 33's Quarterly MDS (minimum data set, a clinical assessment process provides a comprehensive assessment of the resident's functional capabilities and helps staff identify health problems),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on general kitchen observation and maintenance staff interview the facility failed to maintain the physical environment of dietetic services as evidenced by standing water in one of the floor drains and missing tiles in the dry storage area. Findings: It would be the standard of practice to ensure floors are constructed of smooth and durable surfaces to allow for easy cleaning (USDA Food Code, 2022). During general kitchen observation on 9/17/24 beginning at 9:30 a.m., it was noted there was a significant amount of water on the floor in front of the 3-compartment sink adjacent to the dish machine. It was also noted there was a floor drain that was filled with water, some of which was overflowing onto the floor. It was also noted there were missing floor tiles, that contained food debris, in the upper right-hand corner, underneath the wire shelving in the dry storage area. In a follow up observation on 9/18/24 at 4 p.m., in the presence of Maintenance Staff (MS) the surveyor asked him to evaluate the drainage issue in the floor drain. MS agreed there should be no standing water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective infection prevention and control practices when: a. A symptomatic COVID-negative resident (Resident 36) was cohorted with a confirmed COVID-positive roommate (Resident 15) in the Red Zone, b. Three resident visitors were wearing inappropriate PPE during their visits, c. Surgical masks were improperly worn by multiple staff, d. Staff were touching residents' face masks without performing hand hygiene, e. A staff did not doff his PPE before leaving an isolation room, f. A staff was wearing a cloth mask in the facility, g. A bearded staff was wearing an N95 respirator mask and working in an isolation room, h. PPE signs were not posted outside of an isolation room, i. Vaccination status of facility visitors were not verified, j. A resident's mask was placed on her face after it fell on the floor, and k. A staff was wearing a surgical mask in the Red Zone. These failures have the cumulative potential to spread infections,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective and inclusive call system. This failure led to delays for expressions of frustration and feelings of neglect by the delayed provision of care for residents, and increased the potential to negatively affect the psychosocial well-being of all 61 vulnerable residents. Findings: During an interview on 7/25/22 at 9:18 a.m. in her room, Resident 56 pointed to a hand-held bell on her bedside table and stated those bells were currently used to call for staff. Resident 56 stated the call lights [system] have been broken for about two years now. During an observation of the adjacent bed on 7/25/22 at 9:24 a.m., Resident 22's bedside table was against the wall, located approximately three feet from the resident's bedside. A similar hand-held bell was on the table. Resident 22 exhibited marked confusion during an attempted interview. Resident 56, who was present in the room at the time of the interview, stated her roommate was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when: 1. A room housing two residents (Resident 15 and Resident 36), had overflowing bins of trash and soiled linens, from which strong, offensive, and fetid smells originated. In this same room dry, urine-appearing (yellow) stains were observed on the floor. 2. Hallway carpets were soiled, stained, and appeared unvacuumed, 3. Three resident rooms had sticky floors (Rooms 107, 113 and 136) and dirty fall mats (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]), 4. The building's central linoleum flooring was cracked and dingy, and 5. The shower room had cracked, discolored tiles, and peeling paint. These failures resulted in Residents 15 and 36 to verbalize discomfort and disgust, and living in dirty conditions had the potential for unhappiness and a decreased level of self-worth of all 61 residents. Findings: During an observation on 7/25/22 at 9:20 a.m., the hallway carpet of the North…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to appropriately respond to resident abuse allegations for two of three residents sampled for abuse (Residents 207 and 12), when: a. Resident 207's abuse allegation was not promptly reported and investigated, and failed to suspend from duty the staff member who was the alleged perpetrator, and b. The facility failed to complete and maintain documentation of a thorough investigation of Resident 12's abuse allegation, with the alleged perpetrator reinstated back to work after 45 minutes of suspension. These failures had the potential to result in further abuse of Resident 207 and Resident 12, and other vulnerable residents from the staff member. Findings: a. During an interview on 2/1/22 at 10:54 a.m., Administrator stated she was the facility's abuse coordinator. During a record review and concurrent interview on 2/1/22 at 3:17 p.m., a progress note in Resident 207's medical record dated 9/3/21 indicated, at 3:16 [family member named] made allegation of verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address significant weight loss and provide nutritional and hydration services to one of six sampled residents (Resident 158), consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment. This failure resulted in significant weight loss, and had the potential to result in further weight loss, malnutrition and dehydration for Resident 158. This finding also may have contributed to Resident 158's rapid decline in April of 2022, which lead to Resident 158's death. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 158 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (A chronic disease characterized by high levels of blood sugar)and History of Poliomyelitis (A viral disease which may affect the spinal cord causing muscle weakness and paralysis), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Nursing notes dated 4/21/22 at 5:54 p.m. indicated Resident 158 passed away the evening of 4/21/22 at the facility. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy in accordance with standards of practice for two of two sampled residents (Residents 34 and 54) for respiratory care when: a. Resident 34's oxygen was connected to an empty humidifier for two days, and b. Resident 54's oxygen tubing was unlabeled. This failure resulted in Resident 34 to experience dry and painful nostrils (nose) due to inadequately humidified oxygen, and the use of unlabeled oxygen tubing increased the risk for Resident 54 to develop respiratory infections. Findings: a. During an observation on 7/25/22 at 3:30 p.m., Resident 34 was asleep in bed. Resident 34 was observed wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator (Oxygen concentrators take in air from the room and filter out nitrogen. The process provides the higher amounts of oxygen needed for oxygen therapy). The oxygen was running at 5 liters per minute. A bottle of empty humidifier water dated 7/19/22 was connected to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident 158) sampled for pain, received adequate pain management consistent with nursing standards of practice, the resident's individualized care plan and facility policy. Licensed nurses did not implement interventions to reduce her pain, on several occasions when her pain was as high as 8/10 (Pain Scale: a tool health care professionals utilize to help assess a person's pain; the pain scale is from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the worst pain imaginable). This had the potential to result in feelings of helplessness, suffering, and extreme discomfort for Resident 158. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 158 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (A chronic disease characterized by high levels of blood sugar)and History of Poliomyelitis (A viral disease which may affect the spinal cord causing muscle weakness and paralysis), according to the facility Face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing services to ensure resident safety and meet the healthcare needs of the residents, when: a. the facility failed to provide sufficient Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) to meet resident's needs; and b. the facility failed to ensure Licensed Staff B had the appropriate competencies and skills to provide care to the resident population. These failures placed residents at risk of not achieving their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and placed them at risk of serious harm or death. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/25/22 08:48 a.m., Resident 31 rang the [hand-held] bell at 8:50 a.m. for a few minutes but no staff came to answer her bell. Resident 31 stated she needed help repositioning herself. She stated current position in bed was getting uncomfortable. Resident 31 rang the bell again at 8:55 a.m. and no staff came to answer her bell. Resident 31 was becoming anxious. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Evaluate the competencies of the treatment nurse, and 2. Document medication administration assessments for six residents (Resident 13, Resident 21, Resident 22, Resident 38, Resident 56, and Resident 107) on paper medication administration records when the facility power went down. These failures potentially resulted in the treatment nurse misidentifying a pressure injury (also called pressure ulcers or decubitus ulcers; damage to skin and underlying tissues caused by prolonged pressure on the skin) for Resident 207, and had the potential to negatively affect all residents with skin treatments; and resulted in an incomplete medical record for residents. Findings: 1. On 1/20/22, the Department received a complaint that Resident 207 had been sent to an acute care hospital where it was discovered he had multiple, severe pressure injuries on his backside and hips. Review of Resident 207's medical records from the acute care hospital revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure monthly medication regimen reviewsn (MRR) were conducted by the Medical Director (MD) and Director of Nursing (DON) addressing the follow-up recommendations from the pharmacist. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for harm or adverse consequences from medications administered. Findings: During an interview on 7/27/22 at 10:00 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked for the facility's MRR binders along with the policy and procedures. The DON did not have binders and stated all the MRR documents were in the Electronic Medical Records (EMR). MRR documents were requested for the months of April, May, and June. During an interview on 7/28/22 at 08:30 a.m., the MD was present in the facility and conducting resident assessments with the DON. The MD was asked if he reviewed the consultation reports provided by the consultant pharmacist when monthly MRR's were conducted and he stated he does review the pharmacist's recommendations with the DON. During an interview on 7/28/22 at 9:43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and maintained using safe medication practices when: a. Expired COVID-19 PCR (transcription polymerase chain reaction) test vials were found in the medication refrigerator, b. Medication disposal container in the medication storage room was unsecured, c. Expired medications for one resident (Resident 21) were located on a medication cart, and d. Medications were not re-ordered timely to ensure one resident (Resident 12) received a prescribed dose of medication These failures had the potential to alter the integrity of stored medications and put residents at risk for adverse consequences of medications administered. Findings: During an observation of the medication storage room on 7/26/22 at 9 a.m., four to five boxes of COVID-19 PCR test vials were found in the medication refrigerator. The expiration date on the test vials was 11/15/2020. Also, the top of the medication disposal container was found unsecured and the entire top came off rendering the contents easily accessible.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at appropriate temperatures affecting their safety, attractiveness and palatability. This failure had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses, reduced caloric intake, malnutrition, and weight loss among the residents of the facility. Findings: During an observation on 7/25/22 at 1:23 p.m., it was noted the last lunch tray was just served to the residents of the North Hallway of the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/27/22 at 1:30 p.m., a taste-test tray was savored in the facility's conference room where Surveyors were working, in the presence of the Dietary Manager. This was done right after all residents of the facility were served their lunch trays, a process that took from 7/27/22 at 12:30 p.m., until 1:28 p.m. The temperatures of all the entrees and fluids on the tray were taken by the Dietary Manager. The temperature of the milk on the tray was 56 degrees Fahrenheit, and so was the temperature of the cranberry juice. The Dietary Manager confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare meals in a sanitary manner, when: a. Spoiled and expired food was found in the kitchen refrigerator, b. Unlabeled food was found in the kitchen refrigerator, c. The floor in the kitchen and dry storage areas were dirty and sticky, d. Dented cans were found stored along with the canned foods in good condition, e. The facility's ice machine was soiled, f. The toaster in the kitchen was soiled, and g. Two Dietary Aids prepared and served food after contaminating their hands with the lid of a trash can. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness and spread of infections to the vulnerable resident population. Findings: During an initial tour of the kitchen, with the Dietary Manager present, on 7/25/22 at 8:25 a.m., chopped, spoiled and unlabeled watermelon was found in the kitchen refrigerator in a small cup. The watermelon had a soggy, slimy appearance. This was observed by the Dietary Manager, who discarded it immediately. During the observation, unlabeled applesauce and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive action plans for identification, analysis, correction, and evaluation of systemic care issues, including repeat survey deficiencies. This failure had the potential to prevent timely recognition and improvement of care services that do not meet standards of quality for all 61 residents. Findings: During an interview on 7/29/22 at 8:40 a.m., the Adminstrator stated their QAPI (Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement) projects were based on several sources such as CASPER reports, previous survey findings, and concerns identified by the department heads. A review of the facility's CASPER 3 ([Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting] a report compiled of survey findings that demonstrate the facility's performance) indicated a pattern of repeat deficiencies related to infection control, dirty environment, and kitchen services, from 2017 to 2019. During an interview on 7/29/22 at 9:02 a.m., the Adminstrator stated there was no current QAPI plans for the kitchen since 2018, as issues have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to protect one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 35) from verbal abuse when the two facility staff witnessed a licensed staff (Licensed Staff E) swear at one sampled resident (Resident 35), hit the side of her helmet, and shove her back in her wheelchair. This failure placed Resident 35 at risk for further physical and/or mental health harm from verbal and physical abuse. Findings: Resident 35 was [AGE] years old with a diagnosis of Huntington's Disease (a rare movement disorder that causes the progressive breakdown (degeneration) of nerve cells in the brain), muscle spasms (painful, involuntary and unpredictable contractions and tightening of muscles) and aphasia (a disorder that affects how you communicate). Resident 35 was totally dependent on staff for provision of care. During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/25/22 at 9:49 a.m., Resident 35 was in front of the nursing station, in a reclining wheelchair, asleep. Resident 35…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation timely for one out of one sampled residents (Resident 35). This failure placed Resident 35 at risk for serious physical and/or mental health consequences and potential ongoing abuse for Resident 35 and all residents in the facility when not reported immediately. Findings: Resident 35 was [AGE] years old with a diagnosis of Huntington's Disease (a rare movement disorder that causes the progressive breakdown (degeneration) of nerve cells in the brain), muscle spasms (painful, involuntary and unpredictable contractions and tightening of muscles) and aphasia (a disorder that affects how you communicate). Resident 35 was totally dependent on staff for provision of care. During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/25/22 at 9:49 a.m., Resident 35 was in front of the nursing station, in a reclining wheelchair, asleep. Resident 35 was wearing a helmet. Per Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 35's diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-01 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide discharge documentation for one resident (Resident 157). This failure had the potential for Resident 157 to leave the facility without proper care and services to maintain her health. Findings: During a Medical Record Review on 7/28/22 at 13:00 p.m., the closed record for Resident 157 did not contain the required discharge documentation (e.g., discharge summary signed by the physician, a list of medications, a care plan .). During an interview on 7/28/22 at 13:55 p.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) was asked what the process was for preparing a resident for discharge to home. The SSD stated there should be: a resident assessment, a discharge summary signed by the physician, a nurse assessment, pre-discharge assessment with instructions and medication list, arrangements for home health care [if needed], appointments for follow-up visits with a physician, physical therapy [if needed], and a care plan. The SSD confirmed the required documents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide weekly showers and honor shower requests for two of three sampled residents (Residents 208 and 26) for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). These failures resulted in residents, who were vulnerable and dependent on staff for ADL care, to be unkempt, feel neglected and unclean, and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's physical and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: Resident 208 During an interview on 7/26/22 at 2 p.m., Resident 208 stated she was going to request for a shower today. Resident 208 stated she had been in the facility for about two weeks but had yet to have a shower. Resident 208 stated she was initially told her shower days were Mondays and Thursdays, but another staff had told her different days. Resident 208 stated the confusion over the schedule could not have been the only reason she had not had a shower. Resident 208 stated she asked staff for a shower last week and was told, they were too busy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow-up with a cardiology referral for one of three residents (Resident 41) with an artificial cardiac pacemaker (A small device that's placed (implanted) in the chest to help control the heartbeat), for more than six months after the primary care physician ordered the referral. This failure had the potential to result in malfunction of the pacemaker, delay in care, and possible harm or death to Resident 41. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (A type of heart disorder marked by an irregular or rapid heartbeat), and Pulmonary Hypertension (A type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review indicated Resident 41's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 5/21/22, indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 24) for dietary services received the meal portions she required. This finding had the potential to result in unintended weight loss, malnutrition, and reduced caloric intake for Resident 24. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (A nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), and Anemia (A condition in which the blood does not carry enough oxygen to the rest of the body, most commonly caused by not having enough iron), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Record review of Resident 24's tray ticket for lunch on 7/27/22, indicated, LARGE PT (Large food portions), CHOP MEAT. During tray line observation on 7/27/22 at 12:28 a.m., Dietary Aid X was observed serving the main entrees on four residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-01 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that fluid preferences were honored for one of six sampled residents (Resident 46) for food/fluid preferences. This had the potential to cause nutritional deficiencies, dehydration and weight loss for Resident 46. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (A chronic disease characterized by high levels of blood sugar) and Osteomyelitis (Inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 46's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 5/20/22 indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score was 15, which indicated her cognition was intact. Record review of Resident 46's tray meal for lunch on 7/27/22, indicated, Dislikes - No Juice No Milk. During tray line observation in the facility kitchen on 7/27/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$144,866 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $144,866 — penalty dated 2024-06-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-21 for 91 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 53.3-2.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.3-2.3 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLCAlameda, CA 1 of 5French Park Care CenterSanta Ana, CA 1 of 5North Valley Nursing CenterTujunga, CA 1 of 5Tarzana Health And Rehabilitation CenterTarzana, CA 2 of 5Blythe Post Acute LLCBlythe, CA 2 of 5College Vista Post-AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Cottage Crest Post AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Diamond Ridge Healthcare CenterPittsburg, CA 2 of 5Gordon Lane Care CenterFullerton, CA 2 of 5Heritage ManorMonterey Park, CA 2 of 5Spring Valley Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 2 of 5Sunny Hills Post AcuteLa Mirada, CA 2 of 5Torrey Pines Post Acute And RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Trabuco Hills Post AcuteLake Forest, CA 2 of 5Villa Del Sol Post AcuteBellflower, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Healthcare Center, LLCAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Bonita Hills Post AcuteLa Habra, CA 3 of 5Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterRiverside, CA 3 of 5Country Oaks Care CenterPomona, CA 3 of 5Courtyard Care CenterSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Extended Care Hospital Of RiversideRiverside, CA 3 of 5Knolls West Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 3 of 5Menifee Lakes Post AcuteSun City, CA 3 of 5Mission Carmichael Healthcare CenterCarmichael, CA 3 of 5Paramount Convalescent Hosp.Paramount, CA 3 of 5Pelican Ridge Post AcuteNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Sunset Manor Conv HospEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Vineland Post AcuteNorth Hollywood, CA 4 of 5Garden Park Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 4 of 5Las Vegas Post Acute & RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ocean View Post AcuteEscondido, CA 4 of 5Park Regency Care CenterLa Habra, CA 4 of 5Pomona Vista Care CenterPomona, CA 4 of 5Sierra View Care CenterBaldwin Park, CA 4 of 5Vista View Post AcuteVista, CA 5 of 5Alcott Rehabilitation HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Citrus Nursing CenterFontana, CA 5 of 5Del Mar Convalescent HospitalRosemead, CA 5 of 5Excell Health Care CenterOakland, CA 5 of 5Mission Care CenterRiverside, CA

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CRESCENT CITY POST ACUTE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 11/04/2025
SUN MERIDIAN HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/04/2025
JOHNSON, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025
DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025
JOHNSON, FRANKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/04/2025
KOCHEK, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025
MITCHELL, SIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025
OXFORD, MICHEALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025
PORTER, RENEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025
SUN MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025
CABRERA, AMANDAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025
FARRALES, MARYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$633K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 15%Other / private 5%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $633K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$341per resident / day
operating cost
$10,378per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$333per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056296. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next