Diamond Ridge Healthcare Center
2351 Loveridge Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (925) 427-4444 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $42,033 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-23)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.10 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.07 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 199 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 77.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.1%CMS range 49.6–62.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.6%CMS range 6.5–11.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 77.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 81.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 3.3–8.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.34 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the facility cooling system to provide eight of 12 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) an environment with a safe and comfortable temperature. The failure to prevent excessive heat (temperatures in excess of 81ºF, degrees Fahrenheit) in the facility resulted in physical discomfort for Residents 3, 4, 6, 7; Resident 5 was nauseous for three days; Resident 2 had difficulty sleeping; and Resident 1 was unable to receive restorative nursing care for two days. This failure had the potential for dependent, bed-bound Residents 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 to suffer death or disability as a result of heat stroke (the body temperature rises rapidly, sweating mechanisms fail, and the body is unable to cool down) and/or heat exhaustion (the body overheats causing excessive sweating and rapid pulse). This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ, a situation in which a facility's noncompliance has caused or is likely to cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat Resident 1 with respect and dignity when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not wash Resident 1's buttocks when CNA 1 gave Resident 1 a shower. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling upset and angry. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 11:07 a.m., with Resident 1, the resident stated CNA 1 did not wash her buttocks when CNA 1 gave her a shower on 12/27/25 at 10 a.m. Resident 1 stated she asked CNA 1 to wash her buttocks because the resident could not reach it. Resident 1 stated CNA told her that CNA 1 did not want to hurt her back if CNA 1 bent too much to wash Resident 1's buttocks. Resident 1 stated she felt upset and angry. During a review of Resident 1's Facesheet (information containing contact details, brief medical history at-a-glance) dated 1/16/26, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 2's family member (FM) 1 was provided proper training in the use of broda wheelchair (a broda wheelchair is a specialized, highly adjustable positioning wheelchair). This failure resulted in Resident 2 falling from the broda wheelchair and hitting her face on the floor while being wheeled by FM 1. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 10:14 a.m., with Resident 2, the resident stated that on 12/16/25, while being wheeled by FM 1, she fell from her wheelchair and hit her face in the floor. Further stated her fall could have been prevented if the facility trained FM 1 on how to safely and properly wheel Resident 2 with the broda wheelchair. During a review of Resident 2's Facesheet (information containing contact details, brief medical history at-a-glance) dated 1/16/26, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unsteadiness on feet and compression fracture of vertebra (meaning the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and responsible party (RP) were promptly notified for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had respiratory distress (difficulty breathing). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to develop further exacerbated medical complications and/or need for emergency medical treatment at the acute hospital. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 12/29/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included asthma (asthma is a long-term lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe. The tubes that carry air in and out of the lungs become swollen, narrow, and produce extra mucus, similar to trying to breathe through a very thin or clogged straw). During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the progress notes documented by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 dated 5/14/25 at 4:27 p.m., indicated, .Respiratory: Difficulty breathing noted. Nurse noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and prepare foods in a sanitary manner that prevented foodborne illness for the facility when: 1. Eleven unlabeled and undated sandwiches were stored in the refrigerator, 2. Multiple food items were stored in the dry storage room beyond use by date, and 3. Two outdated sandwiches and eight grapes with mold was stored on Resident 54's bedside table. These failures had the potential for residents to be exposed to food borne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/12/24 at 7:30 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) in the kitchen, eleven unlabeled and undated sandwiches and a paper with written 8/8 and UBD [use by date] 8/9 was inside a rectangular plastic container stored in the refrigerator. The DS stated the sandwiches was prepared on 8/8/24 and should have been thrown away after use by date. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 10:25 a.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD stated sandwiches should be labeled with a date of when it was prepared and should be thrown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely develop and provide a baseline care plan for three of 32 sampled residents (Resident 108, 109, and 363) when the baseline care plans were not developed within 48 hours of Resident 108, 109 and 363's admission and the baseline care plan written summaries were not provided to the Resident 108, 109, 363 and the representatives. This failure had the potential to reduce the continuity of care and communication between Resident 108, 109, 363, the representatives, and the facility staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 108's admission Record(AR), the AR indicated, Resident 108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 108's Baseline Care Plan dated 7/23/24, the Baseline Care Plan indicated Resident 108's baseline care plan was not developed within 48 hours of admission and Resident 108…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled residents (Residents 28, 21, 63 and 84) received necessary care to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene when: 1. Resident 28 had long facial hair and long fingernails with black matter underneath, 2. Resident 21 had long fingernails with black matter underneath, 3. Resident 63 had long, thick facial hair, and 4. Resident 84 had long facial hair. This failure resulted in Residents 28, 21, 63 and 84 at risk for skin irritation and infection. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 28's admission Record dated on 8/13/24, the record indicated Resident 28 had diagnoses of dementia (a loss of brain function that occurs with certain diseases, affecting one or more brain functions such as memory, thinking, language, judgment, or behavior) and legal blindness. During a record review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and observe infection control practices when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 did not wear face shield inside COVID-19 isolation room, 2. CNA 5 did not perform hand hygiene before entering Resident 166's room, 3. a glucometer (a device used to check blood sugar level) was stored inside the medication cart had traces of dark red stains around it, 4. a tray full of multiple single-use lancet supplies (a small sharp device that pricks the skin to draw a blood sample for testing blood sugar levels), a bottle of blood sugar test strips, alcohol pads and a glucometer device was placed on top of Resident 35's bed was not disinfected by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 after use, 5. LVN 5 dropped the bottle cap for Resident 363's Famotidine (an over-the-counter medicine that is used to prevent and treat acid indigestion and sour stomach) on the floor, picked it up and placed it back without disinfecting it, 6. one opened and unlabeled toothbrush and two used tubes of toothpaste were observed on top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three closed resident records sampled (Resident 112) was not coded correctly on the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment tool used to direct health care needs) when Resident 112 was discharged home. This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding Resident 112's discharge status. Findings: During a review of Resident 112's admission record, dated 8/14/24, revealed Resident 112 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE]. The admission record also revealed, Resident 112 was discharged on 6/21/24 and was discharged to: Home. During a review of Resident 112's MDS, dated [DATE], Section A2105 indicated 04 which meant Resident 112 was discharged to an Acute Care Hospital. During a review of Resident 112's order summary dated 6/17/24, indicated Patient discharging home per request on 6/21/24 with family . During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop new interventions to address behavioral care and treatment for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 264) with dementia (a disorder of mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorder, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) when Resident 264 exhibited physical and/or verbal aggression towards others 24 days of out 31 days in May 2024. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 264 to harm herself and other residents in the facility. Findings: Review of Resident 264's admission Record dated 8/13/24 indicated, Resident 264 was admitted with diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident 264's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool), dated 4/16/24, indicated Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening tool to identify resident's cognitive status) score of 5 out of 15, indicated Resident 264 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated Resident 264 had episodes of physical symptoms (hitting, kicking, pushing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 364) received Cromolyn Sodium Ophthalmic Solution (a prescription eye drop medication used to treat allergic eye conditions) according to physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 364 not receiving appropriate treatment to control eye allergy symptoms and experiencing very itchy eyes. Findings: During a record review of Resident 364's Minimum Data Set (Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.) dated 7/8/24, the MDS assessment indicated Resident 364's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment for cognition status) score was 8 out of 15 which indicated mildly impaired mental status. During an observation on 8/13/24 at 4:38 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5, LVN 5 only administered oral medications to Resident 364 during the medication pass observation. During a record review of Resident 364's Medication Administration Record (MAR),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 52) was free from unnecessary medication, when Resident 52 was prescribed and given Risperidone (medication to treat symptoms of schizophrenia (a mental illness that causes disturbed or unusual thinking, loss of interest in life, and strong or inappropriate emotions)) and did not have schizophrenia. This failure resulted in Resident 52 being administered an unnecessary medication and had the potential for increased morbidity (the condition of suffering from a disease or medical condition) and mortality (death). Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission record, dated 8/13/24, indicated, Resident 52 had diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia (symptoms affecting thinking and social abilities interfering with daily functioning), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. During a review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 4/25/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling practices with census of 110, when: 1. Resident 5's inhalation medication with limited shelf life after opening was not dated for beyond used date in medication cart #2b, and 2. Resident 59's intravaginal (insertion through the vagina or birth canal) medication was stored together with the oral medications in medication cart #2a. These failures had the potential to contribute to unsafe use of medications and potential for medication error. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and observation on 8/13/24, at 11:10 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, Resident 5's opened and undated Symbicort (an inhalation drug used to treat breathing problems) was stored in medication cart #2b. The manufacturer label on the box indicated Discard within three months after removing from foil pouch. LVN 3 stated there was no open date written on the box nor on the inhaler. LVN 3 stated when an inhalation medication was opened, it should have been dated per the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) raised her arm at Resident 1, as if she was to strike Resident 1. CNA 1 had previously exhibited aggressive verbal behavior towards Resident 4 and 5. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for emotional and psychological distress. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission record dated 4/17/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions.). During a record review of Resident's 1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.) dated 3/1/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to notify and consult with the physician when Resident 1 was unable to sleep despite the use of sleep medication. This failure potentially contributed to increase in episodes of negative behavior and falls and had the potential to result in delayed modification of treatment regimen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar levels), non-traumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage (brain injury), dementia (a loss of brain function that occurs with certain diseases, affecting one or more brain functions such as memory, thinking, language, judgment, or behavior), Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2), the facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was administered olanzapine (treats psychosis, a mental illness), lexapro (anti-depressant, treats depression) and trazodone (anti-depressant) with adequate monitoring of adverse effects from the medications. This failure had the potential to result in delayed management of adverse effects and unnecessary use of medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, depression, paranoid schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus, and end stage kidney disease. During a review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report as of 9/6/23, the Order Summary Report indicated orders for Resident 2 to receive the following medications: lexapro 5 milligrams (mg) one tablet daily, olanzapine 5 mg one tablet in the morning and olanzapine 15 mg one tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to ensure Resident 1, who was at risk for aspiration, was provided honey thick liquids (thicker than nectar thick, less pourable from a cup or a bowl) as ordered by the physician when nectar thick consistency liquid (easily pourable than honey thick, like thicker cream soups) was served. This failure had the potential to result in aspiration (when food or liquid enters the airway and goes into the lungs). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in August 2015 with diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, glaucoma (eye condition when pressure increases inside the eyes, damaging the optic nerve), hyperlipidemia (increased blood cholesterol levels), hypertension (high blood pressure) and hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid gland, thyroid does not produce enough thyroid hormones). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safely operating toilet for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 9 and 10). This failure resulted in toilet water leaking on the bathroom floor, attracting insects and had the potential to become a slip hazard resulting in injury or death. Findings: During an observation and interview, on 8/17/23, at 2:30 p.m., with Resident 9, a toilet was observed in Resident 9's bathroom. The bathroom was shared between Resident 9 and Resident 10. A blanket was folded and placed beneath the toilet. The blanket was wet and upon lifting the blanket, insects were found underneath. Photos of the insects were taken by surveyor. Resident 9 stated the toilet had not been fixed since the last time surveyor was in the facility in June 2023. During a record review of surveyor notes, dated 6/6/23, at 3:14 p.m., the notes indicated Resident 9's toilet was leaking, and a blanket was placed beneath the toilet. The notes indicated Resident 9 stated the toilet was leaking for over 2 years and a blanket was used to contain the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-15 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a baseline care plan for four of five sampled residents when Residents 41, 254, 255, and 257 did not have baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission. This deficient practice had the potential to decrease the continuity of care and communication between care givers resulting in poor quality care and potential adverse outcomes. Findings: 1. During a review of the medical record for Resident 41, there were no baseline care plans. Resident 41 was admitted [DATE]. Resident 41 did not have a completed Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool for planning care). Resident 41 had diagnoses that included end stage kidney disease, diabetes (blood sugar disorder), left above the knee amputation, high blood pressure, and use of blood thinners. 2. During a review of the medical record for Resident 254, there were no baseline care plans. Resident 254 was admitted [DATE]. Resident 254 did not have a completed MDS. Resident 254 had diagnoses to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staffing to provide care for five of five sampled residents, Resident 13, Resident 38, Resident 58, Resident 254, and Resident 255. This deficient practice resulted in Residents not getting call lights answered, not getting showers, not having assistance to use the bathroom which lowers the quality of care and the potential to cause an accident and psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. During an interview with Resident 254 on 4/11/22 at 11:30 a.m., Resident 254 stated on Sunday (4/10/22), he had to wait 30 minutes to go to the bathroom. During an interview with Resident 255 on 4/11/22 at 12:10 p.m., Resident 255 stated the facility is understaffed. Resident 255 stated on Friday (4/8/22), he called for assistance, and no one came. Resident 255 stated he got up to the bathroom by himself, which he knew he was not supposed to do, and had an accident (soiled self) on the way. During the Resident Council meeting on 4/12/22 at 10:15 a.m., Resident 58 stated call lights don't get answered in a timely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review , the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure for Medication Regimen Review to act upon the Consultant Pharmacist's (CP) report of medication irregularity for one (Resident 84) sampled resident when Resident 84 CP recommendation for use of quetiapine (Seroquel- antipsychotic medication) was not followed up in a timely fashion. {According to the manufacturer of Seroquel, elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Seroquel not approved for use in psychotic conditions related to dementia. Although causes of death varied, most of the deaths appeared to be related to cardiovascular e.g. heart failure, sudden death}. [Reference: https://www.drugs.com/pro/seroquel.html] This deficient practice had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary drugs and adverse side effects. Findings: Review of the admission Minimal Data Set (MDS-an assessment screening tool used to guide care), dated 9/30/21, indicated Resident 84 had little interest or pleasure in doing things,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve palatable food when meatballs were served for lunch that lacked flavor. This deficient practice had the potential to decrease meal enjoyment and residents to decline to eat. Findings: During a residents council meeting on 4/12/22 at 10:16 a.m., residents complained about the taste of the food served. Review of the Cooks Spreadsheet dated 4/12/22 showed the spring menu was meatballs with gravy, penne (pasta) with garlic and herb, peas with margarine, and iceberg lettuce green salad. During a test tray on 4/12/22 at 1:26 p.m., accompanied by the Dietary Supervisor (DS), lunch served and sample tested consisted of a plate of pasta, meatball, gravy and vegetable. The meat balls when tasted had no flavor. DS stated the facility just changed the menu and thinks the meatballs were mixed with oat meal.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food storage practices when: a. Kitchen floor tiles had brownish black residual discoloration, b. Two dishwasher racks had brownish/black discoloration, c. Ten cans of applesauce had used-by-date that expired 9/30/21. These deficient practices had the potential for an unsanitary food environment or serving expired food resulting in foodborne illness. Findings: During the tour of the kitchen on 4/11/22 at 10:37 a.m., and accompanied by the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the following were observed: Kitchen floor tiles had brownish black residual discoloration and two dishwasher racks had brownish black discoloration. During an interview on 4/12/22 at 8:30 a.m., DS could not provide when the kitchen floor was last washed. DS stated the housekeeping department was responsible for cleaning and washing the kitchen floor. During an interview on 4/12/22 at 10:28 a.m., the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) stated she was not aware that cleaning and washing the kitchen floor was part of her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices during storage and handling of resident's respiratory equipment for four of four sampled residents. For Resident 255, Resident 256, and Resident 257, their oxygen cannula tubing was not dated for staff to know when the next tubing change should occur. For Resident 254, the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (C-PAP, a machine to keep the airway open while sleeping) mask and tubing were undated and left exposed to the air on the night stand. This failure had the potential for the spread of infection and cross-contamination. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview on 4/11/22 at 12:00 p.m., Resident 254's C-PAP mask and tubing were lying out on the nightstand and not protected and stored in a bag. Resident 254 stated the C-PAP was brought from home and the mask has been on the night stand open to air since being admitted to the facility. During a review of the medical record for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-Resident Assessment and Care Screening tool used to guide care), was accurate for two ( Resident 82 and 90) sampled residents when Resident 82 and 90's preadmission screening for serious mental illness was not coded accurately. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to not received appropriate mental health care and services. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 82's Annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS - resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 4/30/21, indicated section A preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) was coded zero and indicated Resident 82 was not currently considered by the state level 11 PASRR process to have a serious mental illness. Resident 82's diagnoses included schizophrenia (a long term mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior leading to faulty perception, withdrawal from reality into fantasy and delusion and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and goals for dialysis (artificial kidney machine to remove waste products and excess fluids) care for one (Resident 88) of one sampled resident. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact Resident 88's quality of life, and quality of care and services received. Findings: During a review of Resident 88's medical record, the Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/23/22, indicated Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Section C of the MDS, it indicated Resident 88 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15, meaning cognitively intact. Resident 88 had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), heart failure, end stage renal (kidney)disease, diabetes, anxiety, depression, and was on dialysis. During a review of Resident 88's care plans showed there was no care plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide podiatry services (foot care including cutting of toenails) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 33). This failure had the potential to cause injury including ingrown toenails and scratches to feet and legs. Findings: A review of Resident 33's Face sheet (document with residents' general information) indicated Resident 33 had multiple diagnoses, including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance (a form of dementia causing memory loss, problems with judgement/reasoning that can include issues with mood, sleep and agitation). A review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS - comprehensive assessment of a residents' functional abilities) dated 2/1/22, indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS - test used to evaluate cognitive function) score of one out of 15, indicating severe impairment. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/12/22, at 10:10 a.m., with Resident 33, Resident 33 was lying in bed with very long toenails on both feet. Resident 33 indicated she did not know…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain respiratory care orders or follow orders for three of four sampled residents when Resident 254 did not have an order for C-PAP (a machine that provides continuous positive airway pressure to keep airway open while sleeping). Resident 256 did not have the correct flow of oxygen being delivered, and Resident 257 did not have an order for oxygen. This failure had the potential to cause harm by delivering too much oxygen to Resident 256 with chronic obstructive pulmonary (lung) disease (COPD) or giving unnecessary supplemental oxygen or C-PAP to Resident 257. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview on 4/11/22 at 12:00 p.m., Resident 254's C-PAP mask and tubing were on the nightstand and not stored in a bag. Resident 254 stated the C-PAP was brought from home and the mask has been on the nightstand since he was admitted to the facility. During a review of the medical record for Resident 254, the record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the skilled nursing facility did not effectively manage the pain for one of 20 residents (Resident 155). Resident 155 did not receive pain medication as ordered by the doctor. This failure resulted in unnecessary pain for Resident 155. Findings: Record review on 4/12/2022 of the document admission Record showed Resident 155 had diagnoses that included a fractured arm. Review of the document Order Summary Report dated 4/5/2022 showed Resident 155 was to receive, Aspercreme Lidocaine Cream 4% (Lidocaine HCl). Apply to skin topically one time a day for pain and remove per schedule. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Patient 155 was to receive the Aspercreme and the start date was 4/7/2022. Patient 155 complained of pain levels between 3 and 4 since her admission to the facility on 4/5/2020 (pain level scale 1 - 10, one is mild and 10 the worst pain). During medication pass on 4/12/2022 at 9:38 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) stated there was no Aspercreme in the medication cart and she was not sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently supply a medication prescribed by a physician for one (Resident 9) of five sampled residents. This failure resulted in Resident 9 experiencing nausea, dizziness and headaches. A review of Resident 9's Face sheet (document with residents' general information) indicated an initial admission date of 3/2/17 with multiple diagnoses including, chronic pain and neuropathy (a condition causing weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage). During an interview on 4/11/22 at 12:45 p.m., with Resident 9, Resident 9 stated recently, there were missed multiple doses of Nortriptyline (medication used to treat nerve pain and depression) because the facility ran out. Resident 9 stated with missed doses of the medication, resident felt nauseous, dizzy and got headaches. During an interview on 4/14/22, at 10:50 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, LVN 4 stated nurses are responsible for reordering resident medications before they run out. If a resident misses a dose of Nortriptyline, residents can have pain. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two sampled residents (Resident 60 and 84) were free from unnecessary drugs as follows: 1. Resident 60 was administered buspirone (antianxiety) without adequate monitoring of behavior manifestations and medication side effects. 2. Resident 84 was administered quetiapine (Seroquel- antipsychotics) without adequate monitoring of behavior manifestations and medication side effects. Definition: A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. According to the manufacturer of Seroquel, elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Seroquel not approved for use in psychotic conditions related to dementia. Although causes of death varied, most of the deaths appeared to be related to cardiovascular e.g. heart failure, sudden death}. [Reference: https://www.drugs.com/pro/seroquel.html]. These failures had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary medications and had the potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the skills competency evaluations were completed for dietary staff. The dietary Aide (DA) and one [NAME] (CK) competency skills evaluations were not completed for providing the residents' food services. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unsafe food preparation practices. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 4/12/22 at 8:57 a.m., DA could not demonstrate how to operate the three compartment sink. DA stated she was not trained on when and how to use the three compartment sink. The three compartment sink is the manual procedure for cleaning and sanitizing dishes when the dishwasher breaks down or fails to operate properly. During an observation of the tray line on 4/12/22 at 11:37 a.m., in the presence of the Dietary Supervisor (DS), CK had served food on a plate without first checking the food temperature. During an interview on 4/12/22 at 8:51 a.m., CK stated she was promoted from dietary aide to a cook when the previous cook resigned. CK stated she was not provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain one (Resident 59) sampled resident's wheelchair in good working condition when Resident 59's wheelchair was squeaky and difficult to maneuver. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 59 having difficulty moving around the facility in his wheelchair. Findings: During an observation on 4/11/22 at 12:00 p.m., Resident 59's wheelchair had squeaky sounds when propelling self in the facility. During an interview on 4/11/22 at 12:00 p.m., Resident 59 stated his wheelchair was difficult to mobilize and makes squeaky sounds. Resident 59 stated he had reported the problem with his wheelchair to the staff. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care), dated 3/3/22, indicated Resident 59's Basic Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 (meaning good long and short term memory, no cognitive impairment). During an interview on 4/11/22 at 12:43 p.m., the Maintenance Supervisor ( MS ) stated he was not notified of Resident 59's squeaky wheelchair. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control program was implemented and to use the proper sanitary technique when: 1. Registered Nurse/Nursing Supervisor (NS 1) used gloves that was removed from her uniform pocket to clean an opened wound and applied a dressing. 2. One staff used their bare hands to cut a biscuit while serving breakfast. 3. Four of seven staffs' health records did not have proof of their vaccination against Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR-contagious viral infections) and Tdap (Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis-whooping cough) which are communicable bacterial infections, with the exception of Tetanus. These failures had the potential for the transmission of infection. Findings: 1. The record review of the admission Record indicated Resident 79 had diagnoses that included quadriplegia (partial or total paralysis of all four limbs and torso of the body). The record review of the pressure ulcer (bedsore) care plan indicated Resident 79 had a Stage IV pressure ulcer (full skin and tissue loss) in the sacral area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the Advance Directive (legal document with written instructions for the provision of health care) policy at the time of admission for two (Residents 55 and 209) of 30 sampled residents, or their legal representative about future healthcare choices, and name a person to make decisions when the resident is unable to do so. For Residents 55 and 209, this failure resulted in not verifying if there were existing advance directives for healthcare to guide choices for doctors and caregivers or contact the resident/representative if they wish assistance in formulating an advance directive. Findings: 1. The record review of Resident 55's, Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a medical order form indicating the resident's intensity of treatment wishes in the event of a medical emergency) was prepared on 9/2/18. The form included three selections to indicate if Resident 55 did or did not have an Advance Directive or if the Advance Directive was not available. The check boxes for these selections were left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernail care and nail hygiene for two (Resident 79 and 85) of 30 sampled residents as follows: 1. Resident 79 had hand contractures (the shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints), and long curved fingernails that were digging into the resident's right palm. 2. Resident 85 had long fingernails with brownish residue underneath the nails and chipped nail polish. These failures had the potential for nail bed injury, poor skin integrity, and harboring dirt and bacteria underneath the fingernails that could contribute to the spread of infection. Findings: 1. During an observation on 7/15/19 at 10:16 a.m., Resident 79 was noted with long, [NAME] fingernails that were digging into the palm of the resident's contracted right hand. During an interview on 7/15/19 at 10:16 a.m., Resident 79 stated he would like his long fingernails trimmed. A record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 79) of 30 sampled residents received restorative care services (assists patient to gain strength and mobility) according to the comprehensive care plan. For Resident 79, staff failed to apply a hand, palm roll for protection and intervention for contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). This failure had the potential to cause further decline of range of motion (ROM), joint mobility, and skin integrity. Findings: The record review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 79 on 4/30/17 with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (partial or total paralysis of all four limbs and torso of the body) and contractures. A record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- Resident Assessment tool used to guide care) dated 6/19/19 indicated Resident 79 had limited ROM and impairment to both upper and lower extremities, including the elbow, wrist, and hands. The record review of the Occupation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance and arrange services to restore the hearing aids for one (Resident 7) of 30 sampled residents to maintain hearing ability . This failure resulted in no services to assist with repairing the faulty hearing aid and caused Resident 7 frustration due to impaired communication with staff and others. Findings: A record review of the admission Record indicated Resident 7 had diagnoses that included major depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 7/8/19, indicated Resident 7 had hearing loss that caused moderate difficulty with hearing. During an interview on 7/15/19 at 9:47 a.m., Resident 7 stated he was frustrated because his faulty hearing aids was not repaired. Resident 7 further stated he was informed by the Social Services Director (SSD) that he was not qualified for a replacement hearing aid. Resident 7 stated he could not hear when staff communicated with him and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one (Resident 66) of 30 sampled residents, the facility failed to elevate the head of bed (HOB) to 30-45 degrees to prevent potential complications while receiving enteral nutritional feeding (liquid formula via the gastrointestinal tract) through the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a surgically placed tube into the patient's stomach). This failure had the potential for aspiration (fluids entering the windpipe) or aspiration pneumonia (lung infection). Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 66 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and receiving gastrostomy feeding. During an observation and concurrent interview on 1/9/17 at 8 a.m., Resident 66 was lying on his right side, flat in bed, and receiving enteral feeding at 70 milliliters (ml) via pump. The record review of the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were reconciled (count verification) to prevent potential diversion or tampering when one of five medication carts (Med Cart 1 A) had a blister-pack (pills stored in bubble seal and popped out through a paper or foil backing) of Hydrocodone (opioid pain medication) had a torn backing exposing the drug. In addition, one of five medication carts had no completed Controlled Drug-Count Record. These failures had the potential for unauthorized access, diversion, and abuse of controlled substances. Findings: 1. During the inspection of Med Cart 1 A on 7/16/19 at 10:45 a.m., number 15 of 30 Hydrocodone [5 milligrams (mg)/325 mg acetaminophen] controlled tablets in a blister-pack was torn exposing the drug. During an interview with the Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) on 7/16/19 at 10:45 a.m., LVN 2 confirmed the blister-pack had a tear exposing the controlled drug. LVN 2 stated the drug did not have a secure closure, and this will be reported to the Director of Nurses (DON) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy for Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) for one (Resident 46) of thirty sampled residents when the antidepressant medication was not reviewed monthly. This deficient practice had the potential to result in physical, mental or psychosocial harm for Resident 46. Findings: A record review of theadmission Record showed Resident 46 had multiple diagnoses including, dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life) with behavioral disturbance and major depressive disorder. The record review of the physician's order dated 4/10/18, Paxil (antidepressant) 10 mg (milligram) by mouth, one time a day for resisting care. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 5/23/19 indicated Resident 46 did not have symptoms of depression. During an initial observation on 7/15/19 at 8:17 a.m., Resident 46 was receiving morning care from staff and cooperative. On 7/17/19 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 46 was calmly walking and going to attend an activity. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from unnecessary drugs for three (Resident 46, 85, 93,) of 30 sampled residents as follows: 1. For Resident 46, an antidepressant (Paxil) was ordered without a medical indication for its use. 2. For Resident 85, an antipsychotic (Seroquel) medication was administered without supporting documentation for its continued use. 3. For Resident 93, a sedative medication was ordered with no monitoring of hours of sleep and adverse effects of the drug. These deficient practices had the potential for physical, mental or psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. A record review of the admission Record showed Resident 46 had multiple diagnoses including, dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life) with behavioral disturbance and major depressive disorder. The record review of the physician's order dated 4/10/18, Paxil (antidepressant) 10 mg (milligram) by mouth, one time a day for resisting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled, stored, and secured in accordance with the facility's policy as follows: 1. An opened bottle of Procrit [used to treat anemia (low red blood cell count)] was expired, unlabeled, and had no opened date. 2. A half bottle of expired anticholinergic Glycopyrrolate (reduces excessive drooling) medication was stored with currently used medications in the top drawer of Medicine Cart 1 C. 3. One of two treatment carts was left unlocked and unattended. These practices had the potential for reduced potency of the medications due to improper storage, and placed residents at risk for accidental use or ingestion of topical medications when left unlocked. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the Medication Room (Med room [ROOM NUMBER]) on 7/15/19 at 10:53 a.m., an opened vial of Procrit 10,000 units/milliliters (ml) injection, stored in the refrigerator of Nursing Station 1, had expired on 6/30/19. The Procrit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe storage of laboratory test supplies when expired laboratory sample collection kits were stored with currently used laboratory test kits. This failure had the potential for inaccurate test results and affect the medical provision of care. Findings: During an inspection of Nursing Station 2-Medication Room on [DATE] at 10:53 a.m., four vials of Culture Swabs for Nasopharygeal Collection Kits for Viruses had expired 3/'19 and were stored on the shelf with currently used laboratory test kits. During an interview with the Nursing Supervisor 2 (NS2) on [DATE] at 10:53 a.m., NS 2 confirmed the culture swabs kits were currently used to collect samples from the residents. NS 2 stated the expired culture swabs will be discarded. The record review of the policy and procedure, Storage of Medications dated [DATE] indicated, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide residents with a nourishing, well balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional intake and special dietary needs for two (Residents 16 and 162) of 30 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 16 did not receive his diet vanilla pudding and low sugar house shake. 2. Resident 162 did not receive his preferred scrambled eggs and biscuit. This failure resulted in residents not meeting their dietary needs and meals preferences. Findings: 1. A record review of the admission Record indicated Resident 16 had multiple diagnoses, which included diabetes mellitus (blood sugar disorder). During a lunch observation and concurrent interview with Resident 16 on 7/15/19 at 1:15 p.m., Resident 16 stated, I did not receive my vanilla pudding and house shake for two days. He further stated, Staff told me they were out of pudding and shakes. During an interview and record review of Resident 16's diet slip with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) on 7/15/19 at 1:30 p.m., CNA 1 stated out means the kitchen was out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed follow the policy and procedure to store, clean floors, and keep equipment under sanitary conditions when: - The Kitchen floor tiles had brown sediments and drainage pipe area had yellowish buildup. - The Ice machine had pink-white build up on the front panel cover plate, back plate, and around the condensing unit. - Emergency food supplies were missing eight cans of beef steak - The food processor, mixing bowl, and slicer had white & brown sediment. These failures had the potential to result in waterborne illnesses from the unsanitary ice machine, contamination from using unclean cooking equipment or not enough supplies to meet emergency preparedness. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 7/15/19 at 7:55 a.m., and accompanied by the [NAME] (CK), the following was observed: Hand washing sink with yellowish sediment and brownish stain, kitchen floor tiles and drainage pipe area with brownish stain and yellowish sediment buildup, the ice machine had pinkish-whitish buildup on the front panel, food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews for three (Residents 160, 93, and 161) of 30 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records contained accurate health status information as required. 1. For Residents 160 and Resident 93, a care plan for the pacemaker (device to help control abnormal heart rhythms) did not contain the type of pacemaker, set rate and insertion date. This failure had the potential for not detecting a pacemaker malfunction. 2. For Resident 161, there was no complete labeling with date/time and initialed by the registered nurse (RN) for IV (intravenous, into the vein) antibiotic medication. This failure had the potential for medication errors. Findings: 1. A record review of the admission Record indicated Resident 160 had multiple diagnoses, which included atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow) and had a cardiac (heart) pacemaker. During a record review of Resident 160's care plan, Cardiac-Pacemaker dated 7/16/19 reflected there was no information regarding the pacemaker…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-04-15 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure (P&P) for staff requesting COVID-19 (a contagious respiratory infection mainly affecting the lungs) vaccine religious exemption. This failure had the potential for unvaccinated staff to work in the facility without the administrators' and other staff awareness which could expose residents and staff to COVID-19. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/14/22, at 9:09 a.m., with the Administrator (Admin), the Request for Accommodation: Religious Exemption from Vaccination, was reviewed. Admin confirmed the form was not from the facility, but a third-party vendor that contracts with the facility to provide services. There was no indication that the request had been reviewed or approved by Admin. Admin indicated they did not follow their policy for approving or denying COVID-19 vaccine for staff and religious exemption request. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Infection Control Manual - Coronavirus (COVID-19), revised 3/30/22, which indicated, Requests for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$42,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $42,033 — penalty dated 2023-08-23
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIAMOND RIDGE POST ACUTE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/03/2022 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/11/2021 |
| JOHNSON, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2021 |
| KOCHEK, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| OXFORD, MICHEAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2022 |
| SMV PITTSBURG LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2005 |
| SUN MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/22/2021 |
| FARRALES, MARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| NG, ANDREW | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2025 |
| VILORIA, HARRIET | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/12/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555287. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.