Vineland Post Acute
10830 Oxnard Street, North Hollywood, CA 91606 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 49 certified beds · (818) 763-8247 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.97 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.86 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 206 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 76.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.0%CMS range 45.5–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.9–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 76.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 69.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 5.9–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.40 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 44.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.76 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to create a care plan for the use of a tab alarm (a safety monitoring device connected to the resident's clothes and onto a bed or chair/wheelchair that alarms to notify caregivers once contact is separated). This deficient practice denied Resident 1 an outlined, personalized set of interventions for staff to implement for the specific use of the tab alarm, resulting in Resident 1 encountering a fall and requiring hospitalization for further evaluation. Cross reference F689 Findings:During a review of Resident 1's undated admission record, the admission record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 4/10/2024 with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by underlying systemic illnesses causing chemical imbalances that affect the brain), Parkinsons disease (an incurable movement disorder affecting coordination and motor function),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1). Develop a care plan for the use of a tab alarm (a safety monitoring device connected to the resident's clothes and onto a bed or chair/wheelchair that alarms to notify caregivers once contact is separated). 2). Implement the use of a tab alarm correctly as ordered. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 encountering a fall and sustaining an acute fracture which required hospitalization for further evaluation. Cross reference F656Findings:During a review of Resident 1's undated admission record, the admission record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 4/10/2024 with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by underlying systemic illnesses causing chemical imbalances that affect the brain), Parkinsons disease (an incurable movement disorder affecting coordination and motor function), difficulty in walking, dementia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sample residents (Resident 4) was free from significant medication errors by failing to:1. Ensure Resident 4's physician orders were followed. 2. Ensure licensed nurses administered Resident 4's scheduled medications on time. On 1/13/2026, Resident 4's scheduled 9 a.m. medications were administered at 11:33 a.m. (one hour and 33 minutes after the allowable administration time). 3. Ensure Resident 4 received the docusate sodium oral capsule (a medication, taken by mouth, used to soften stool) 250 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement) before the medication was documented as administered in the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR). These deficient practices had the potential to cause Resident 4's medical condition to worsen. Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (undated), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 10/23/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that blocks airflow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to readmit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). On 12/17/2025, Resident 1 was discharged to the GACH and was for readmission back to the facility on [DATE]. The facility only readmitted back Resident 1 on 12/23/2025. This deficient practice resulted to a violation of Resident 1's right to be readmitted back to the facility. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/17/2025 with diagnoses including epilepsy (a brain disorder causing seizures [abnormal electrical activity in your brain that temporarily affects your consciousness, muscle control, and behavior], and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 9/27/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was severely impaired with thought process and required maximal assistance from staff to complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's licensed nursing staff failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards to three of three sampled residents (Residents 2, 24, and 4) reviewed for insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) use by failing to rotate (a method to ensure repeated injections are not administered in the same area) subcutaneous (sq - beneath the skin) insulin administration sites. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse effect (unwanted, unintended result) of the same site subcutaneous administration of insulin such as excessive bruising, lipodystrophy (abnormal distribution of fat) and cutaneous amyloidosis (is a condition in which clumps of abnormal proteins called amyloids build up in the skin). Cross reference F760. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/24/2025, and readmitted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the residents' choices by failing to administer and document skin care treatments per the physician's orders to the urethral (a hollow tube that lets urine, a waste product, leave the body) orifice penile shaft (the external opening where urine exits the urethra), the bilateral upper arms and legs, and the face on multiple shifts in December 2025 for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25). These deficient practices had the potential to result in the development and / or worsening of skin infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/12/2021 and most recently readmitted the resident on 11/18/2025 with diabetes mellitus type two (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with diabetic polyneuropathy (a disorder of the peripheral nervous system that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications in the feet from medical conditions for one sampled resident (Resident 25) by failing to provide and document treatments per the treatment orders to the right foot- second toe diabetic ulcer (an open sore or wound on the foot of a person with diabetes [DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing]) and the left heel diabetic ulcer on multiple shifts in December 2025. These deficient practices had the potential to result in worsening of diabetic foot ulcers and infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/12/2021, and most recently readmitted the resident on 11/18/2025, with diabetes mellitus type two with diabetic polyneuropathy (a disorder of the peripheral nervous system that may result in pain, discomfort, and mobility issues), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a slow progressive narrowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards for three of four sampled residents (Resident 31,5, and 22) reviewed for accidents by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 31 did not use her personal heating blanket (a blanket with thin, insulated electric wires or heating elements built into the fabric) in the facility without staff supervision. 2. Resident 5's floor mat (its main purpose is to soften the impact if the resident falls out of bed, which helps prevent serious injuries like fractures) did not have any equipment or furniture on top of them. 3. Resident 22 did not self-administer medications left unattended on her overbed table without a physician's order. These deficient practices increase the risk of accidents such skin burns and falls with injuries on the residents and had the protentional to result in ongoing unauthorized medication administration, duplication or substitution of ordered eye drop treatment and lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which are not in accordance with the prescriber's order, manufacturer's specifications, and accepted professional standards) for four sampled residents (Residents 19, 2, 24, and 4) by failing to: 1. Administer clonidine (medication to treat high blood pressure [BP]) as needed (PRN) for a systolic blood pressure (SBP - the first / top number in the BP measurement) greater than (>) 160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg - measurement of pressure) when on 12/16/2025 at 8:56 a.m. Resident 19's BP measured 171/63 mm Hg. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse effect (unwanted, unintended result) from high BP resulting in an increased risk for myocardial infarction (MI - heart attack), stroke (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), kidney disease, and vision problems. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records were updated to show documented evidence that advanced directives (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) were discussed with one of thirteen (13) sampled residents (Resident 26) reviewed for advance directive by failing to ensure Resident Representative was provided with advance directive formulation information. These deficient practices violated the resident's rights and/or representative's right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advanced directives. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/10/2025, and readmitted the resident on 11/5/2025, with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive (a state of decline that is multifactorial and may be caused by chronic concurrent diseases and functional impairments), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (the buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcer/injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) to two of four sampled residents (Residents 24 and 22) reviewed for pressure ulcers by failing to set the low air loss mattress (LALM - a special type of air mattress that uses a constant, gentle flow of air through microscopic holes to keep the skin dry and prevent pressure wounds) according to the resident's weight and per physician's order. These deficient practices had the potential for development and worsening of pressure ulcers/injuries to residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 24's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/1/2019, and readmitted the resident on 12/18/2024, with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of urine received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 25 and 36) by failing to: 1. Ensure indwelling suprapubic catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine through a small opening in the lower abdomen) care was provided per physician's orders and facility policy and procedure (P&P) for Resident 25 on multiple dates in 12/2025. 2. Ensure that Registered Nurse (RN) 1 cleaned the urinary catheter tubing during Resident 25's indwelling catheter care per facility P&P during an indwelling catheter care observation on 12/17/2025. 3. Ensure residents urinal bottles (portable container for collecting urine) were labeled with the name, room number, and date it was provided to the residents for Resident 36. These deficient practices had the potential for cross-contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a urostomy (a surgically created opening on the abdomen that allows urine to exit the body) received appropriate treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 25) by failing to ensure suprapubic catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine through a small opening in the lower abdomen) and urostomy site care was provided per physician's orders and facility policy and procedure (P&P) for Resident 25 on multiple dates in 12/2025. These deficient practices had the potential for cross-contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object or place to another) and urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection of the urinary system). Cross-reference F690. Findings: a.1. During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/12/2021 and most recently readmitted the resident on 11/18/2025 with diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care provided to residents was consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4) reviewed for respiratory care by failing to ensure Resident 50's oxygen via nasal cannula (NC - a simple, two-pronged device that delivers extra oxygen to the nose) was not touching the floor. The deficient practice had the potential for residents to develop complications such as shortness of breath and desaturation (low levels of oxygen in the blood) and respiratory infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/11/2025, with diagnoses of respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe), severe sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), immunodeficiency (a condition where the immune system is weakened, making the body unable to effectively fight off infections, viruses, bacteria, and other diseases, leading to frequent or severe illnesses). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 19) reviewed during the Medication Administration task, by failing to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 administered medication per the physician prescribed orders when LVN 1 omitted (did not administer) folic acid (a dietary supplement that helps the body make red blood cells) 400 micrograms (mcg - a unit of measurement) on 12/16/2025 during the 9 a.m. routine medication pass (a structured process of administering medications to ensure residents receive medications safely, accurately, and timely). 2. Ensure LVN 1 administered the cranberry 400 milligrams (mg - a unit of measurement) tablet (dietary supplement taken for urinary tract health) per physician's orders on 12/16/2025 during the 9 a.m. medication pass observation when LVN 1 administered a 450 mg tablet. These deficient practices had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Two (2) medication errors out of 28 total opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 7.14%, affecting 2 of four (4) residents observed for medication administration (Resident 19 and 5). The medication errors resulted when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 administered medication per the physician prescribed orders when LVN 1 omitted (did not administer) folic acid (a dietary supplement that helps the body make red blood cells) 400 micrograms (mcg - a unit of measurement) on 12/16/2025 during the 9 a.m. routine medication pass (a structured process of administering medications to ensure residents receive medications safely, accurately, and timely) to Resident 19. 2. Ensure LVN 2 administered the crushed thiamine HCl oral tablet (an essential, water-soluble nutrient that the body needs daily to turn the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to discard from use one opened, expired insulin (a medication used to control high blood sugar levels) Lantus (brand name glargine, a long -acting insulin) Solostar (type of insulin injection device) pen stored at room temperature for Resident 4, in accordance with manufacture's requirements and facility policy and procedures, in one of one medication carts (Medication cart 2). This failure increased the risk for Resident 4 to receive insulin that was compromised (decreased) in efficacy and potency (strength of a medication) for treating Resident 4's blood sugar levels potentially resulting in high or uncontrolled blood sugar levels and diabetic coma (a life-threatening complication that can result from very high blood sugar or very low blood sugar levels). Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep updated vaccination (medications used to prevent diseases usually given by injection or by mouth) documentation and administer the 2025/2026 influenza (flu) vaccine (medication used to prevent a highly contagious respiratory illness, which spreads easily through the air or when people touch contaminated surfaces) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 13) reviewed during the Infection Control task.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the spread of influenza among residents, visitors, and staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 13 on 2/18/2025 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), immunodeficiency (decreased ability of the body to fight infections and other diseases), and infection at the surgical site following a procedure.During a review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enforce its own policy related to a safe, sanitary environment and infection control when a shared bathroom was noted with overflowing toilet paper in the trash, stool and urine noted inside the toilet bowl for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for the residents. Findings: A record review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with medical history including Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that affects the brain), acute pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas), urinary tract infection (bladder infection), dementia (memory loss), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), asthma (inflammation of airways), and Alzheimer's disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment by failing to provide room temperatures between 71 degrees Fahrenheit (°F - unit of measure) to 81 °F for seven of 38 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7). This deficient practice had the potential to result in uncomfortable temperatures related to cold weather compromising the health and safety of Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Findings: During an observation on 12/19/2024 at 11:45 a.m., the Maintenance Director (MD) got room [ROOM NUMBER]'s temperature reading of 67.8 °F. During an observation on 12/19/2024 at 11:46 a.m., the MD got room [ROOM NUMBER]'s temperature reading of 65.1 °F. During an observation on 12/19/2024 at 11:47 a.m., the MD got room [ROOM NUMBER]'s temperature reading of 66 °F. During an observation on 12/19/2024 at 11:48 a.m., the MD got room [ROOM NUMBER]'s temperature reading of 68.5 °F. During an observation on 12/19/2024 at 11:49 a.m., the MD got room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm by one resident towards another that results in bodily injury) and verbal abuse (harsh and insulting language directed at a person) when on 11/17/2024 at 7 a.m. Resident 2 struck Resident 1, pushed the bedside table towards Resident 1 causing him (Resident 1) to fall on the floor as he attempted to get up from the bed to move out of his (Resident 2) way, and yelling profanities (a type of language that includes dirty words and ideas) at Resident 1. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining injuries including abrasion (a minor injury where the top layer of your skin is scraped off, usually caused by rubbing against a rough surface) to Resident 1's left forearm (the part of the human arm between the elbow and the wrist), abrasion to Resident 1's lower back, bruise to Resident 1's right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 97) was provided a homelike environment by failing to: 1. Ensure the residents' overhead lamp with a pull-on cord had lamp covers on for Residents 42 and 149. 2. Maintain two of two shower rooms when shower floors were observed with peeling paint. 3. Ensure Resident 33's floor mats were in good condition and did not have a torn segment. These deficient practices had the potential to violate the resident's right to living in a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 42's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/14/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 42's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/15/2024, indicated Resident 42 did have fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity including the right to be free from physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body, cannot be removed easily by the resident, and restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body) for three of four sampled residents (Residents 25, 21, and 33) investigated during review of the physical restraints care area when the facility failed to: 1. Obtain a physician's order and informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedure after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) and perform an entrapment risk assessment for Resident 25's use of bed rails (also known as side rails, adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed and are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes ranging from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide in-services regarding the use of physical restraints. This deficient practice placed the residents are risk for the inappropriate use of physical restraints. Cross reference F604 Findings: a. During a review of Resident 33's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/13/2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) with acute (sudden) exacerbation (worsening of symptoms), unspecified cataract (a cloudy area in the lens of the eye that can make it difficult to see), and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 33's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 10/1/2024, the H&P indicated the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/16/2024, the MDS indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post in a visible and prominent place daily the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staffing directly responsible for resident care per shift. This deficient practice resulted in the actual staffing information not being readily accessible and available to residents and visitors. The deficient practice had the potential to cause inadequate staffing. Findings: During a tour of the facility on 10/25/2024 at 10:00 a.m., did not observe staff posting in a visible and prominent place of the facility. During an interview with the Staff Developer (DSD) on 10/25/2024 at 10:30 a.m., DSD stated the posting is located inside the nursing station. The DSD stated, she was not aware that it needs to be posted in a visible area of the facility. The DSD stated, she will make sure to post the actual hours worked by the staff in a visible area. During an interview with the DON on 10/24/2024 at 3:00 p.m., the DON stated, the staffing information was not posted in a visible area, however it is now updated and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess residents' ability to self-administer medication for one of four sampled residents (Resident 36) investigated under the accidents care area when Resident 36 was not reassessed for medication self-administration upon re-admission to the facility and quarterly according to Resident 36's care plan. This deficient practice had the potential for medications errors during self-administration of medication for Resident 36. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 36 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with diabetic polyneuropathy (nerve damage that affects people with diabetes) and encounter for attention to colostomy (a surgical procedure that brings one end of the large intestine out through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain privacy of confidential information for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) left Resident 42's electronic health record (EHR-a digital version of a patient's paper chart) open, unattended, and out of sight of LVN 2. This deficient practice violated Resident 42's right to privacy and confidentiality of their medical records. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/14/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 42's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/15/2024, the HP indicated the resident has fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally required resident assessment tool), dated 10/23/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. During an observation on 10/23/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of five sampled residents (Residents 21 and 33) investigated during review of the physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body, cannot be removed easily by the resident, and restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body) care area when Residents 21 and 33 did not have a care plan for placing the bed against the wall. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inconsistent implementation of the care plan that may lead to a delay in care or lack of delivery of care and services for the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia and fluctuations (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address the resident's needs for a home health agency referral prior to discharge for one of one sampled resident (Resident 48) reviewed under discharge care area. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for not receiving the necessary care and services related to the resident's discharge goals and needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/5/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by progressive decline in mental abilities, type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 48's Clinical Admission, dated 8/5/2024, the clinical admission indicated the resident had chronic confusion, orientation to person only, and had moderate cognitive impairment (memory loss). During a review of Resident 48's Cognitive Assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 41) being investigated under urinary catheters (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) by failing to ensure the resident's urinary drainage bag was not lying flat on the floor. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 41 to develop a catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI, an infection of the urinary tract caused by a tube [urinary catheter] that has been placed to drain urine from the bladder [an organ inside the body that stores urine until it can be excreted]). Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 3/1/2024 and readmitted the resident on 8/9/2024 with di indwelling urethral catheter, UTI, and sepsis (a life-threatening blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) was assessed after dialysis treatment and to document the assessment for one of one sampled resident (Resident 18) investigated during a review of dialysis care area. This deficient practice had the potential for unidentified complications such as swelling, pain, bleeding, and bruising and had the potential to result in lack of provision of necessary treatment and services after dialysis treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/13/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis and end-stage renal disease (ESRD- irreversible kidney failure). During a review of Resident 18's History and Physical, dated 7/15/2024, indicated the resident did have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of residents for one of five sampled residents (Resident 21) reviewed under the unnecessary medications care area and one of four sampled residents (Resident 15) reviewed under medication administration facility task by: 1. Failing to monitor side effects related to the use of psychotropic medications (a broad class of drugs that affect the mind, emotions, and behaviors) and for signs of bleeding were not conducted on 10/18/2024 for Resident 21. These deficient practices had the potential for side effects to be missed and cause a delay in care for Resident 21. 2. Failing to indicate the aspirin (used as a pain reliever or blood thinner) dosage for Resident 15. This deficient practice had the potential to result in effective treatment in treating the resident's condition. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of four sampled residents (Resident 19) observed during medication administration facility task by failing to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO, microorganisms, mainly bacteria, that are resistant to one or more classes of antibiotics] that uses targeted isolation gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not don (put on) an isolation gown while administering medications through a gastrostomy tube (GT, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach, common for people with swallowing problems) to Resident 19. 2. LVN 2 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI - is a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement) program by: 1. Failing to provide documentation of the written QAPI plan (guides the nursing home's quality efforts and serves as the main document to support implementation of QAPI). 2. Failing to provide documentation of data collection and analysis at regular intervals to include care plan, weights, and narcotics, which were identified by the facility as a problem issue in the facility. These deficient practices had the potential for systemic failures to go uncorrected and no improvement to the facility's delivery of care for all residents. Findings: On 11/10/2023 at 7:52 a.m., Entrance Conference done with Minimum Data Set Nurse 1 (MDSN 1) and provided the Entrance Conference Worksheet (information needed from the facility) during the facility's recertification survey. During a concurrent interview and record review of the Entrance Conference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control policy and procedure by failing to implement and monitor the measures the facility had in place for water testing and monitoring of water management plan (identify hazardous conditions and take steps to minimize the growth and transmission of Legionella [a bacteria that can cause Legionnaire's disease (a serious type of pneumonia [an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs]) and Pontiac fever (a mild flu-like illness caused by exposure to Legionella bacteria)] and other waterborne pathogens in building water system) for 11 out of 11 months (12/19/2022 to 11/12/2023). This deficient practice had the potential to spread infectious microorganisms and placed all the residents and staff at risk for Legionella exposure and other water borne pathogens resulting in serious illnesses including severe pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Findings: During an interview on 11/12/2023 at 8:12 a.m., the Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. A review of Resident 36's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/20/2023 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (also known as an ischemic stroke - the disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a type of abnormal heartbeat that occurs intermittently and stops on its own within seven days). A review of Resident 36's History and Physical, dated 10/23/2023, indicated the resident had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 36's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had the ability to usually understand others and usually make self-understood. The MDS the resident an anticoagulant used during the last seven days since admission. A review of Resident 36's Order Summary Report, dated 10/20/2023, indicated an order for apixaban (an anticoagulant) oral tablet 2.5 mg, give one tablet, by mouth two times a day for deep vein thrombosis (DVT, a blood clot in a deep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers (a skin injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue) from developing for two of two sampled residents (Resident 12 and 139), by: 1. Failing to offload (minimizing or removing weight placed on the foot to help prevent and heal ulcers) a resident's heels while the resident was in bed as ordered by the physician for Resident 12. 2. Failing to develop and implement an individualized plan of care for Resident 139 who had an unstageable full thickness skin or tissue loss - depth unknown (UTD, when the stage is unclear) on the sacral coccyx (tailbone). These deficient practices placed the resident at risk of discomfort and development of new pressure ulcers. Findings: a. A review of Resident 12's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/17/2023 with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder and admitted with an indwelling urinary catheter, will be assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI, common infections that happen when bacteria, often from the skin or rectum, enter the urethra [duct that transmits urine from the bladder to the exterior of the body during urination], and infect the urinary tract) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 36) by failing to: 1. Complete indwelling urinary catheter assessment timely for Resident 36. 2. Accurately assess the genitourinary system for Resident 36, who had an indwelling urinary catheter. 3. Ensure a physician order was in place for the use of an indwelling catheter for Resident 36. These deficient practices had the potential for residents to develop catheter associated urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a presence of a registered nurse (RN) onsite at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the provision of substandard quality of care. Findings: During an interview on 11/12/2023 at 4:03 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she started the position as DON on 9/1/2023. The DON stated she is full-time, and her work schedule is from Mondays to Fridays. The DON stated there is an RN on the weekends. During an interview on 11/12/2023 at 5:18 p.m., the ADM stated RN 1 resigned from the DON position effective 3/21/2023. The ADM stated RN 2 replaced RN 1 as DON on 4/1/2023. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 11/12/2023 at 5:25 p.m., reviewed with the Payroll Coordinator the following documents: - RN 1's Payroll Action Form, dated 2/1/2023. - RN 1's Resignation Letter, dated 3/20/2023, indicated last day as DON on 3/21/2023. - RN 1's employment status, indicated return to work on 4/1/2023 and voluntary-retired on 9/1/2023. The PC stated that on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 20) was free from unnecessary medication when Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) was observed during medication pass administering docusate sodium (a stool softener) and lactulose (a synthetic sugar used to treat constipation) without verifying if the resident had loose stool per doctors' orders. On 11/1/2023, 11/5/2023, 11/8/2023, 11/9/2023, and 11/10/2023, Resident 20 had loose stool or diarrhea. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 20 to continue to have loose stools and had the potential of dehydrating (cause a person to lose a large amount of water) the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/2/2022 and readmitted the resident on 2/26/2023 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction [due to impaired cerebral metabolism]), hepatic failure (is loss of liver function that occurs quickly, in days or weeks, usually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary drugs for two of five sampled residents (Residents 14 and 16) investigated under unnecessary medications by failing to: 1. Provide nonpharmacological interventions (any type of health intervention which is not primarily based on medication) prior to administering as needed (prn) lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) to Resident 14. 2. Monitor an objective and measurable behavioral manifestation for the use of Risperdal for Resident 16. These deficient practices had the potential to result in adverse reaction or impairment in the resident's mental and/or physical condition. Findings: a. A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 6/18/2013 and readmitted the resident on 5/16/2021 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a type of mental health condition that can affect a person's ability to function in their daily life). A review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage and handling of medications by failing to: 1. Destroy disposed medications in an unusable form when disposed medications were observed in one of two medication carts (Med Cart 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in loss, diversion, or accidental exposure. 2. Label influenza medication vial (a multi-use vial) with date it was opened inside one of one medication refrigerator (Med Ref 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in administration of ineffective medication. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/11/2023 at 2:06 p.m., observed Med Cart 1 with Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3), LVN 3 stated the red medication disposal was kept inside the medication cart. LVN 3 stated their practice was to place the disposed medications inside the red disposal container and destroyed using a liquid. LVN 3 stated because it was creating a mess inside their medication carts, they were supposed to dispose it in a bigger disposal bin. LVN 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the kitchen staff failed to ensure the proper storage of food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 35 out of 38 residents by: 1. Failing to label an opened container of oatmeal found in the dry storage area with the date it was opened. 2. Failing to label the following food items found inside the designated resident refrigerator with the date it was received, the date it was opened, and a resident identifier: a. Bottle of ketchup b. Container of strawberry Activia yogurt c. Bottle of Ensure (a meal replacement powder providing complete, balanced nutrition) d. Yema e. Container of [NAME] ice cream f. Box of [NAME]-Dazs ice cream g. Box of vanilla milk chocolate ice cream These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at increased risk of experiencing foodborne illness (an illness that comes from eating contaminated food or drinks). Findings: On 11/10/2023 at 7:49 a.m., during a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect for one of two sampled residents (Resident 20) by failing to ensure Resident 20's indwelling urinary catheter bag (also known as Foley catheter, is a hollow flexible tube inserted in the bladder through the urethra to drain urine) was covered with a privacy bag. This deficient practice had the potential to affect resident's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: A review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/2/2022 and readmitted the resident on 2/26/2023 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction [due to impaired cerebral metabolism]), hepatic failure (is loss of liver function that occurs quickly, in days or weeks, usually in a person who has no preexisting liver disease), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (when a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems), and type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach of the resident for two of three sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 21). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents not being able to call for facility staff assistance and had the potential to result in a delay in or lack of necessary care and services that can negatively affect the resident's comfort and well-being. Findings: a. A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/4/2005 and readmitted the resident on 11/1/2023 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction [due to impaired cerebral (brain) metabolism]), functional quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), and contracture of muscles (occurs when your muscles, tendons, joints, or other tissues tighten or shorten causing a deformity) right lower leg, left lower leg, right upper arm, left upper arm. A review of Resident 4's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence that information regarding advance directives (AD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes were carried out should the person be unable to communicate to a doctor) was discussed to the resident and/or the resident's representative for one of five sampled residents (Resident 28) investigated under advance directives. This deficient practice had the potential to delay emergency treatment or the potential to force emergency, life-sustaining procedures against the resident's personal preferences and or violate the resident's rights and/or representative's right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives. Findings: A review of Resident 28's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 8/13/2023, and readmitted the resident on 10/31/2023, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (COPD, a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-12 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer one out of five sampled residents (Resident 11), who had a positive Preadmission Screening and Resident Review I (PASRR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) to the appropriate state designated authority for a level II PASRR (a person-centered evaluation that is completed for anyone identified by the Level 1 Screening as having, or suspected of having, a PASRR condition, i.e., serious mental illness [SMI], intellectual disability [ID], developmental disability [DD], or related condition [RC]) evaluation. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for Resident 11. Findings: A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/10/2009 and readmitted the resident on 7/29/2023, with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was not able to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for one of three sampled resident (Resident 21). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 27 having poor grooming and personal hygiene and could negatively impact the resident`s quality of life and self-esteem. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/24/2021 and readmitted the resident on 9/28/2023 with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction [due to impaired cerebral (brain) metabolism]), abnormalities of gait and mobility and lack of coordination. A review of Resident 21's Care plan for resident Activity of Daily Living (ADLs) self-care performance deficit, developed on 8/25/2021, indicated interventions to encourage the resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction, with bathing and showering, provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled resident (Resident 20) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs by failing to monitor ammonia levels for Resident 20, who was receiving lactulose (a synthetic sugar used to treat constipation) three times a day for hyper ammonia (a metabolic condition characterized by raised levels of ammonia [a waste product that's normally processed in your liver and is removed through your urine]). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 20 to have an abnormal ammonia level. Findings: A review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/2/2022 and readmitted the resident on 2/26/2023, with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction [due to impaired cerebral metabolism]), hepatic failure (is loss of liver function that occurs quickly, in days or weeks, usually in a person who has no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses documented nonpharmacological interventions (interventions that do not directly involve medication) attempted prior to administering an opioid (class of drugs used to reduce pain) to treat a resident's pain for one (Resident 89) out of one sampled resident investigated for pain management. This deficient practice had the potential to increase Resident 89's risk of experiencing side effects and adverse reaction (an unexpected or unintended effect suspected to be caused by a medicine) to the use of an opioid. Findings: A review of Resident 89's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 11/19/2022, and readmitted the resident on 11/2/2023, with diagnoses including non-pressure chronic (something that continues over an extended period of time) ulcer (an open sore or lesion) of right heel and midfoot and non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left foot. A review of Resident 89's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) had the competency skills to care for one out of three sampled resident (Resident 20) when LVN 3 was observed during medication pass administering docusate sodium (a stool softener) and lactulose (a synthetic sugar used to treat constipation) without checking if the resident had loose stools. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 20 to continue to have loose stools and placed the resident at risk for dehydration. Findings: A review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/2/2022 and readmitted the resident on 2/26/2023, with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction [due to impaired cerebral metabolism]), hepatic failure (is loss of liver function that occurs quickly, in days or weeks, usually in a person who has no preexisting liver disease), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (when a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were two medication errors during medication observation pass out of 28 opportunities resulting in a 7.14% error rate. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for potential adverse effects of the medication due to not administering as ordered by the physician. Findings: A review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/2/2022 and readmitted the resident on 2/26/2023, with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction [due to impaired cerebral metabolism]), hepatic failure (is loss of liver function that occurs quickly, in days or weeks, usually in a person who has no preexisting liver disease), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (when a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' bedrooms meet the requirement of 80 square feet (a unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 18 of 20 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 24, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care, privacy for the residents, and limit the residents' ability to maneuver personal care devices. Findings: During a general observation tour of the facility on 12/15/2025 at 8:58 a.m., observed residents in multiple resident bedrooms. The residents had adequate space to move about freely inside the rooms and nursing staff had enough space to safely provide care to these residents, with space for the beds, side tables, dressers, and resident care equipment. During an interview on 12/16/2025 at 9:17 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated most of the rooms at the facility does not meet the 80 square feet federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-10-25 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident rights to examine the results of the state inspection results (a survey to determine compliance with state and federal regulations) of the facility by failing to post survey results in a place that is prominent and accessible (a place where individuals wishing to examine survey results do not have to ask to see them) to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. This deficient practice had the potential for residents' and their representatives to not have access to the most recent survey results. Findings: During a general observation conducted between 10/23/2024 to 10/25/2024, around the facility, the results of the state inspection results were not observed in readily accessible areas in the facility. During an observation on 10/25/2024, at 3:20 p.m., a posting on the consumer information board indicated the most recent survey results/licensing visit report supported by the related follow-up plan of correction report are located at the nurse's station and to ask…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' bedrooms meet the requirement of 80 square feet (a unit of measure for length) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 18 of 20 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care, privacy for the residents, and limit the residents' ability to maneuver personal care devices. Findings: During a general observation of the facility, between 10/23/2024 to 10/25/2024, observed residents in multiple resident bedrooms. The residents had adequate space to move about freely inside the rooms and nursing staff had enough space to safely provide care to these residents, with space for the beds, side tables, dressers, and resident care equipment. During a group interview with residents, on 10/23/2024, at 10:31 a.m., during Resident Council meeting, Residents 44, 10, 35, 46, and 24 stated they did not have any issues with lack of space in their rooms and the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-12 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' bedrooms meet the requirement of 80 square feet (a unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 18 of 20 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care, privacy for the residents, and limit the residents' ability to maneuver personal care devices. Findings: During a general observation tour of the facility, on 11/10/2023 at 8:58 a.m., observed residents in multiple resident bedrooms. The residents had adequate space to move about freely inside the rooms and nursing staff had enough space to safely provide care to these residents, with space for the beds, side tables, dressers, and resident care equipment. During an interview on 11/10/2023 at 8:58 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) stated room [ROOM NUMBER] has 4 beds with 4 residents. CNA 3 stated there were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLONIAL POST ACUTE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/03/2022 |
| GOLDSTAR NORTH HOLLYWOOD ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/27/2009 |
| JOHNSON, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/11/2021 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/11/2021 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| ESQUER, ALBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2022 |
| FARRALES, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| KOCHEK, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| OXFORD, MICHEAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/03/2022 |
| RODRIGUEZ, KRISSIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| RUTHERFORD, KEINO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| SUN MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/22/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $561K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555011. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.