No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Paramount Convalescent Hosp.

8558 East Rosecrans Avenue, Paramount, CA 90723 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (562) 634-6877 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (562) 634-6877 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$34,613 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $34,613 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-04)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
8534 Rosecrans Ave · (562) 602-8877 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
14501 Lakewood Blvd · (562) 531-8617 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
14113 Downey Ave · (562) 408-3610 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8840 Golden St · (562) 904-7132 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.2%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers13.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.3%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.7%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.942.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.551.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.82U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.35hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.82 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.4%CMS range 28.8–57.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.8–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.0%CMS range 5.9–14.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.38
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
34.4%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 50.8 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-05)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to three of seven sampled residents (Resident 43, 5, and 18) with limited range of motion [(ROM) full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] and mobility (ability to move) by failing to: 1. Obtain baseline (initial measurement taken at an early point and used for comparison over time to monitor changes) ROM measurements of Resident 43's both arms and legs upon admission on [DATE] using the Joint Mobility Assessment ([JMA] brief assessment of a resident's range of motion in both arms and both legs) in accordance with the facility's policy titled, Joint Mobility and Screening and Assessment revised on 1/25/2024. 2. Obtain a baseline ROM measurement of Resident 43's left arm during the Occupational Therapy ([OT] profession aimed to increase or maintain a person's capability of participating in everyday life activities [occupations]) Evaluation on 8/14/2023. 3. Assess Resident 43's left wrist hand orthosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who underwent an open reduction internal fixation ([ORIF] a surgical procedure that puts pieces of a broken bone into place using screws, plates, sutures, or rods) surgery of the right ankle fracture (break in the bone), did not have the surgical wound infected with exposed surgical hardware (pins, plates, or screws used to help fix a broken bone, torn tendon, or to correct an abnormality in a bone) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure treatment nurses (TN 1 and TN 2) followed Resident 1's orthopedic surgeon's treatment orders to stop using an antibiotic ointment (a substance used on the skin to soothe or heal wounds) on Resident 1's right medical ankle and to use a Betadine (a solution used to prevent infection in minor cuts, scrapes, and burns) soaked gauze treatment to Resident 1's right ankle starting on 2/7/2024. TN 1 and TN 2 continued to apply ointment to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control practices for all residents in the facility by failing to:1. To ensure Resident 27 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control measure to prevent the spread of germs), for a chronic pressure injury (PI- injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin).2. To ensure hand hygiene was performed prior to checking the residents' lunch meal trays.These failures had the potential to spread germs through cross-contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products) to residents, staff and visitors.Findings:1. During an observation on 12/04/2025 at 9:10 a.m. in Resident 27's room. There was no sign or personal protective equipment (PPE) alerting staff Resident 27 should be on EBP. The treatment nurse (TXN) was observed doing a wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge and transfer for four of four residents (Resident 3, Resident 27, Resident 29 and Resident 51) by failing to:1. Ensure the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) was notified when Resident 3, Resident's 27 and Resident 29 were transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH).2. Ensure Resident 3, Resident 27 and Resident 51 were offered a bed hold before being transferred to the GACH.These failures violated Resident 3, Resident 27, Resident 29 and Resident 51's rights and had the potential to affect Resident 3, Resident 27 and Resident 51's emotional wellbeing if they could not return to the facility.Findings: A. During a review of Resident's 3 admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/12/2025, and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to:1.Complete a change of condition ([COC] a sudden, clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) behavioral, or functional status which without immediate intervention, may result in complications or death) for three of four sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 7, and Resident 13). 2.Review Resident 2's general acute care hospital (GACH) notes during the admission Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] team members from different departments working together with a common purpose to set goals and make decisions that ensure residents receive the best care) meeting. These failures resulted in the lack of necessary care and treatment related to antibiotic use for Resident 2, Resident 7, and Resident 13. Findings:1.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 2 and 27) drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications by failing to: 1. Include a stop date for prescribed antibiotics, and by failing to reassess the continued need for the medications for Resident 2. 2. Ensure Resident 27 was not overprescribed antibiotics. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 receiving prolonged antibiotic therapy without appropriate monitoring or clinical justification, increasing the risk of adverse drug effects (unwanted, harmful, or unexpected problem as a result of a medicine) and had the potential for Resident 27 to develop multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs- bacteria resistant to multiple antibiotics.)Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including chronic kidney disease (your kidneys are damaged and slowly lose their ability to clean waste…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices in the kitchen were followed by failing to ensure the [NAME] and Dietary Aid washed hands and changed gloves when switching tasks during tray line (process where staff assemble meal trays for residents).These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at risk for acquiring food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria or viruses). Findings: During a kitchen observation on 12/4/2025, at 11:32 a.m., the [NAME] was observed engaging in multiple food service tasks without performing appropriate hand hygiene or changing gloves between activities. Specifically, The [NAME] transitioned from checking food temperatures to scooping beef onto plates without washing hands or changing gloves. The [NAME] walked to the dishwashing area to retrieve a dish and returned to the food preparation area without performing hand hygiene or changing gloves. The [NAME] was also observed opening drawers and then immediately scooping food onto…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the antibiotic stewardship program (coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics by clinicians) including the use of McGeer's Criteria (standardized surveillance definitions to identify and track infections for prevention and control) for three of six residents (Resident 2, Resident 25, and Resident 27).This failure placed the Resident 2, Resident 25 and Resident 27 at risk for unnecessary antimicrobial therapy, adverse drug reactions, and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including chronic kidney disease (your kidneys are damaged and slowly lose their ability to clean waste from your blood), urinary tract infections (UTI- an infection of the bladder/urinary tract), and congestive heart failure (CHF- a heart disorder which causes the heart to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight loss (a weight loss greater than 5% in one month, or 10% change in weight in six months) following readmission from General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) stay for one of four sampled residents (Resident 53).This deficient practice had the potential to delay the Physician's assessment and intervention, placing Resident 53 at risk for continued weight loss and malnutrition. Findings:During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 53 on 9/23/2025 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heartbeat caused by abnormal electrical signals in the hearts upper chambers), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD- a chronic condition where stomach acid frequently flows back up into the esophagus), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 53's History and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor target behaviors for one of 14 residents (Resident 25) while on a psychotropic medication (substance that affects how the brain works, used to treat mental illnesses).This failure resulted in Resident 25 not receiving individualized behavior monitoring necessary to identify the presence, absence, or change in behaviors targeted by the psychotropic medication. Findings:During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/12/2025 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by gradual loss of cartilage), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), Type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract).During a review of Resident 25's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/13/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 25 has fluctuating capacity to understand and make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement goals and interventions on the care plan for two of two residents (Resident 2 and Resident 27) by failing to: 1. Ensure the Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] team members from different departments working together with a common purpose to set goals and make decisions that ensure residents receive the best care), developed a care plan for Resident 27 who had multiple Urinary tract infections (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) and was prescribed multiple antibiotics (medication that kills bacteria). 2. Ensure Resident 27 who should have been on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control measure to prevent the spread of germs) for a chronic pressure injury pressure ulcer/injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) had goals and interventions for the care plan.3. Review Resident 2's hospital discharge notes upon admission. These failures resulted in delayed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform consistent monitor Resident 53's nutritional status by failing to:a. Initiate a weight variance (monitoring process triggered when a resident experiences significant weight fluctuations) andb. Discuss nutritional recommendations during the Interdisciplinary Care Conference {(ICC), a collaborative meeting involving various healthcare professionals to review and update the resident's care plan} after Resident 53 had a significant weight loss (a weight loss greater than 5% in one month, or 10% change in weight in 6 months) of 40 pounds (unit for measuring weight) following admission from the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 53).This deficient practice had the potential to place resident at risk for continued weight loss. Findings:During a review of Resident 53's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 53 on 9/23/2025 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN) demonstrated competency in implementing infection control practices related to antibiotic usage for one of one sampled residents (Resident 2). The facility failed to:1.Monitor Resident 2 who was administered two antibiotics (medications used to treat an infection) since admission on [DATE] with no end date to stop treatment. This failure resulted in Resident 2 receiving two antibiotics for an extended period without appropriate monitoring or reassessment, placing the resident at risk for adverse effects, including potential worsening of chronic kidney disease ( condition in which the kidneys are damaged and gradually lose their ability to filter waste and excess fluids from the blood effectively), which could lead to fluid retention (condition where excess fluid accumulates in the body's tissues, leading to swelling), swelling, and cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that expired enteral nutrition products (specialized liquid formulas used in tube feeding to provide essential nutrients to residents unable to eat by mouth) were removed from the medication storage room after their expiration date. This failure had the potential to result in adverse side effects, including gastrointestinal distress, infection, and loss of potency (strength of a drug or its effectiveness in achieving a desired result), compromising the health and safety of residents receiving enteral nutrition.Findings:During an observation on 12/3/2025 at 2:17 p.m. in Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER], one expired 1500 milliliter (mL-unit of measurement) container of Diabetes source ( enteral nutrition formula) was found in a red basket. The product had an expiration date of 11/24/2025.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/3/2025 at 2:45p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 3 in the central supply room (where nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure consent to treatment documentation was completed with all required elements for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 44).This deficient practice has the potential to result in residents receiving treatments or interventions without understanding the risks, benefits, or alternatives. Findings:During a review of Resident 44's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the patient on 10/26/2001 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure), and major depressive disorder (feel very sad, empty or hopeless most days and interferes with daily life).A review of Resident 4's History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/16/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 4 has the capacity to understand and make decisions.During a record review on 12/03/2025 at 9:15 a.m. of Resident 44's medical record (chart), the documentation of consent to treatment was missing Resident 44's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one of five residents (Resident 1) during a change of condition and notify the physician in a timely manner during multiple episodes of elevated blood pressure. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having a headache and had the potential to result in dizziness, cerebral infarction (part of the brain dies because it's not getting enough blood and oxygen) and re-hospitalization for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 6/4/2022, and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (a condition where one side of your body is paralyzed or experiences weakness), cerebral infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease (thickening or hardening of the arteries caused by a buildup of plaque in the inner lining of an artery) and hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with respect and dignity by failing to ensure Resident 1 ' s indwelling urinary catheter (medical device which helps drain urine from the bladder) drainage bag was covered with a privacy bag (a bag used to the cover and hold the catheter drainage/collection bag so it is not visible). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to feel embarrassed and have low self-esteem by not having his catheter drainage bag not covered. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM – a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and urinary retention (a condition which makes it difficult or impossible to empty the bladder). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures. The facility failed to : a.Ensure Resident 1 and 48's tube feeding ( medical device used to provide nutrition to resident who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth ) and water bags were changed every 24 hours. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination and place the residents at risk for the spread of infection. b. To practice handwashing during wound care treatment on Resident 18 who had a Stage 4 pressure injury (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) in the sacro coccyx (tail bone) area. c. To ensure dirty linens were handled and disposed in a sanitary way after providing personal care for Resident 33 who was treated with antibiotic because of Extended spectrum beta lactamase ([ESBL]-an enzyme that makes bacteria resistant to many antibiotics {medication to treat infection} which makes the infection difficult to treat). d. To…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents had clean and trimmed nails (Resident 17 and 45). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of care and self-esteem. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Psoriatic Arthritis Mutilans (rare and painful condition that severely damages the hands, feet, and sometimes the spine) and atrial fibrillation (irregular and fast heartbeat). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/26/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 17 required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 17's care plan initiated 9/6/2024, the care plan focus was, Resident 17 was at risk for skin integrity with goals that included Resident 17 was to maintain and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 39 and Resident 18) received the necessary treatment and services that will prevent development and promote healing of pressure injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) by: a.Failing to monitor and assess Resident 39's skin areas where the nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) was applied. b. Failing to ensure Resident 18 who had Stage 4 pressure injury on the Sacro coccyx area (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone on the tail bone) was repositioned to offload (method of reducing or removing pressure on the area to help prevent and heal pressure injury) was implemented. These failures resulted in the development of a Stage 1 pressure injury (intact skin with a localized area of redness and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 14 sampled residents received effective pain management by: 1.Failing to assess and treat one of three resident's experiencing pain (Resident 11). 2.Failing to ensure Resident 18's pain level assessment is based on the cognitive level (mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding things) of the resident. These failures had the potential to put Resident 11 and Resident 18 at risk for pain to go unrecognized and untreated leading to delay of care and treatment. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and headaches. During a review of Resident 11's care plan initiated on 2/16/2024, the care plan focus was, Resident 11 had hypertension with goals that included Resident 11 was to remain free from signs and symptoms (s/s) of hypertension.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a.Ensure five of five Restorative Nursing Assistants ([RNA] certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) had an annual competency evaluation (systematic process that evaluated an individual's skill and knowledge) for providing range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) exercises, application of orthotics (also known as splints, material used to restrict, protect, or immobilize a part of the body to support function, assist and/or increase range of motion), and ambulation (the act of walking) to 13 residents receiving RNA services, including one of seven sampled residents (Resident 43) with limited ROM and mobility (ability to move). This failure had the potential for 13 residents receiving RNA services, including Resident 43, to experience a decline in ROM and mobility. b. Ensure Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) 1 and Licensed Vocational Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of five percent or greater as evidenced by the identification of eleven medications errors out of thirty-three opportunities for error, to yield a total error rate of 33.33 percent for the two of four sampled residents (Residents 28 and 37). This failure had the potential for medications to not maintain a therapeutic dose level (maintain a certain level in your blood to work well) when not administer according to physician orders. Findings: During an observation on 10/1/2024 at 10:30 a.m., in Resident 37's room, observed Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 administer Resident 37's 9:00 a.m. medications at 10 :30 a.m. During an observation on 10/1/2024 at 11:24 a.m. in Resident 28's room, observed LVN 4 administer Resident 28's 9:00 a.m. medications at 11:24 a.m. a.During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to: a.Date and label open bag of peanut butter dough, bag of frozen fries and open bottles of salsa in the freezer and refrigerator. b.Practice hand washing during cooking, checking of temperatures of cooked food items and distribution of food during tray line. c.Use a beard net ( worn to contain facial hair)during food preparation and food distribution during lunch tray line. These failures had the potential to cause cross contamination ( unintentional transfer of harmful bacteria from one object to another)and food borne illnesses (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/ spoiled foods)among the residents. Findings: a.During an initial tour observation on 9/30/2024, at 8:10 a.m. with Dietary Aide (DA1) , an open bag of frozen fries and an open bag of peanut butter dough were open but was not labeled when they were opened by kitchen personnel in the freezer. During an observation and interview on 9/30/2024 with [NAME] (CK1), observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0825 — pattern
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide therapy services, including Physical Therapy ([PT] profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function), Speech Therapy ([SLP] profession aimed in the prevention, assessment, and treatment of speech, language, communicative, and swallowing disorders), and Occupational Therapy ([OT] profession aimed to increase or maintain a person's capability of participating in everyday life activities [occupations]) to one of seven sampled residents (Resident 5) with range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) and mobility (ability to move) concerns in accordance with Resident 5's physician signed care plans for OT, PT, and SLP. This failure resulted in Resident 5 not receiving any interventions to improve communication, mobility, and activities of daily living ([ADLs] tasks related to personal care including bathing, dressing, hygiene, eating, and mobility) to reach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Ensure accurate documentation for two of six sampled residents (Resident 43 and 32) with limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) and mobility (ability to move) concerns. This failure resulted in inaccuracies in the provision of care recorded in the clinical records of Resident 43 and 32. b. Ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 38) medication administration record (MAR) accurately reflect licensed nurse administered Resident 38's medication on 10/3/2024 at 9 a.m. This failure had the risk for medication errors or omission in medication administration. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 43's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease ([ESRD] irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis (treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 18) was free from physical restraint by not placing bilateral (both) 1/2 siderails on the bed without a physician's order or assessment. This failure had the potential to place Resident 18 at risk for unnecessary use of restraints that can lead to skin injuries , decline in mobility, and bed entrapment (an event in which a patient is caught, trapped, or entangled in the spaces in or about the bed rail, mattress, or bed frame). Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person focused care plan for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 18) by failing to: 1.Follow and implement interventions for Resident 11's management of pain. 2.Develop a comprehensive care plan that will address Resident 18's pain. These failures place Resident 11 and Resident 18 at risk for delay of care and treatment. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and headaches. During a review of Resident 11's care plan initiated on 10/2/2024, the care plan focus was Resident 11 complains of constant pain with goals that included Resident 11 will minimize complaints of pain. Interventions for Resident 11 included monitor pain every four hours. During a review of Resident 11's Medication Administration Record (MAR), the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 18) with limited range of motion [(ROM) full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] and mobility (ability to move) had two staff members present while using a mechanical lift (a device that helps people who have difficulty moving on their own to be transferred or moved from one place to another) during a transfer from the bed to the shower bed. This failure placed Resident 18 at increased risk for accidents, including a fall from the mechanical lift which could have resulted in physical injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including parkinsonism (group of conditions with symptoms including slow movements, stiffness, tremors, and balance issues), autistic disorder (neurological and developmental disorder that affects how people interact with others,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 failed to keep one of one sampled resident (Resident 38) head of the bed elevated at a minimum 30 degrees at all times during the administration of feedings or medications to prevent aspiration (accidental inhalation of food, liquid, or other material into the lungs) and pneumonia (lung infection) per facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to place Resident 38 at risk for aspiration and pneumonia. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses including gastrostomy ([g-tube] tube inserted in the stomach to assist with feeding), hypertensive heart disease ((heart problems that occur because of high blood pressure), depression (a low mood or loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time), diabetes mellitus type 2 (the body has trouble…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 18) was free from unnecessary medication by: 1.Ensuring non-pharmacological interventions (intervention that does not primarily use medicine) was ordered for Resident 18 who was prescribed with psychotropic medicine ( any drug or substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, and behavior). This failure had the potential to result in the use of unnecessary psychotropic medication to Resident 18. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of two sampled Residents (Resident 43) with meals that accommodated resident's food preferences. This failure had the potential to result in decreased meal intake and can lead to weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure), diabetes mellitus(DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and dependence on renal dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluids from the blood when the kidneys stop properly). During a review of Resident 43's History and Physical(H&P) dated 6/1/2024, the H &P indicated the resident had a fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 3 was aware of what she was signing when she signed the arbitration agreement (AA- a contract in which you give up your right to being certain claims to court). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 not having her right to limit opportunity to initiate judicial proceedings that challenge unfavorable decisions. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 3 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and legal blindness (severely impaired vision). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/29/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool used to assess a patient's cognitive function) score of 15 which indicates that a person's cognition is intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Quality Assessment Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to implement corrective action from the previous re-certification survey regarding the provision of Restorative Nursing Aide ([RNA] certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) services for range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) and mobility (ability to move). This failure resulted in repeated deficient practices for Quality of Care related to the RNA program during the current re-certification survey. Findings: During a review of the Federal Statement of Deficiencies from the facility's last re-certification survey, dated 10/6/2023, Federal Statement of Deficiencies indicated the facility failed to ensure the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) service provided passive range of motion ([PROM] movement of joint through the ROM from an external force with no effort from the person) exercises and applied a splint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the wall in one of 19 rooms (Room A) was properly maintained without any holes. This failure had the potential to expose one of 52 residents (Resident 27) to hazards located in the walls, including water, fire, and pests. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity (condition where a person has an extremely high amount of body fat which can lead to serious health problems), hypertensive heart disease (condition where the heart has to work harder than normal because of high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), type 2 diabetes mellitus (disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and reduced mobility (ability to move). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was assessed at risk for elopement (leaving an institution without notice or permission). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 attempting to elope from the facility by climbing out of the facility s bathroom window and breaking her right leg when she fell to the ground outside that bathroom. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (progressive loss of memory), anxiety (extreme worry), depression (feeling unhappy and without hope) and a history of falling. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]) a standard assessment and care screening tool), dated 11/21/2023 Resident 1's cognitive (the ability to think, reason, and understood) skills for daily decision-making were moderately impaired. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and distributed under food safety requirements by failing to: 1. Ensure ice machine was maintained in a clean and sanitary way. 2. Ensure canned food stored in dry storage pantry had a received date label. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness (food poisoning) for 49 out of the 49 residents in the facility. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on 10/05/2023 at 8:00 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), observed ice machine with brown reddish spots inside the border of the ice machine when wiped with a white paper towel and the inside of the ice machine sliding door was observed with rusty dark spots. During a concurrent observation and interview with DM on 10/5/2023 at 8:00 am., the DM stated the ice machine was cleaned once a month by the maintenance staff but should be cleaned daily. During an observation on 10/05/2023 at 8:15 a.m. in the presence of DM in the dry food storage pantry, observed Campbells soup can was not labelled with the date and time it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to: 1.Ensure visitors wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE: equipment to protect self and others from spreading infectious bacteria and virus) when entering Resident 26's room who were on contact isolation (when a patient has an infectious disease that may be spread by touching either the patient or objects the patient has handled), took a chair and brought it inside Resident 105's room and failed to do hand hygiene (cleaning one's hands that substantially reduces potential pathogens (harmful microorganisms) on the hands). 2. Ensure certified nurse assistant (CNA) 9 donned (put on )PPE inside the room of a resident who was on contact isolation while rendering care. 3. Ensure CNA 8, donned PPE prior to entering resident room on contact isolation. This failure had the potential for cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide prompt efforts to resolve the grievances the residents voiced to the facility through the grievance reporting form and resident council (organized group of residents who meet regularly to discuss and address concerns about their rights, and care in the facility) meetings for three of seven residents (Resident 14, Resident 39, Resident 105) who attended the resident council meeting during the recertification survey. This failure has violated the residents' right to have grievances filed by residents in the facility during the resident council meeting was addressed and resolved. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission record (face sheet) the face sheet indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive disorder of the nervous system that affects movement), diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar) and pneumonia (respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct dosage of medications were administered per physician order to two of two sampled residents (Resident 50 and 32). This failure had the potential for harm to Resident 50 and Resident 32 receiving a medication dosage not ordered by the physician. Findings: A. During an observation and record review on 10/5/2023 at 8:57 a.m. of Resident 50's morning medication administration (med pass) observed Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 dispensed Vitamin B12 (vitamin supplement) 500 micrograms (mcg-strength in microgram unit) to Resident 50. LVN 1 stated the order for Resident 50's was Vitamin B12 50 mcg by mouth daily. LVN 1 stated he gave the 500-mcg dose because Vitamin B12 does not come in 50 mcg. LVN 1 stated the licensed nurses just give Resident 50 the 500mcg dose because Vitamin B12 50 mcg was not available. LVN 1 stated Resident 50 should not receive the Vitamin B 12 500 mcg dose because it was not ordered by the physician.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four Residents (Resident 17) with limited mobility received assistance to improve, maintain and prevent avoidable decline in range of motion and mobility by failing to implement Physical Therapy ([PT] the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods such as massage, heat treatment, and exercise rather than by drugs or surgery) recommendations to start Restorative Nursing Assistive Services ([RNAS] nursing interventions that promote the residents ability to adapt and adjust to living) ordered on 9/18/2023 for Passive Range of Motion (PROM) for the bilateral (both) lower legs for joint integrity (inspection, palpation, active and passive range of motion, and the assessment of supporting structures and special testing). This failure had the potential to limit Resident 17's range of motion to all extremities, gradual loss of strength and development of pressure injury ( damaged to the skin due to prolonged pressure on the skin) due to immobility ( inability to move). Findings: During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services needed were provided to one of two sample residents (Resident 5). Facility failed to: 1.Ensure Resident 5 oxygen tubing was connected to oxygen machine and the nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a patient or person in need of respiratory help) was on Resident 5 nostril. This failure had the potential for complications associated with lack of proper oxygen therapy for Resident 5. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (face sheet) indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to metabolize (process) glucose (sugar) correctly ), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD-progressive disease that makes it hard to breath). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 17 sampled resident (Resident 205) medication was not left unattended at bedside without a physician order for self-administration. This failure had the potential for Resident 205 at risk for medication errors and had the potential for unsafe medication administration to an incorrect resident. Findings: During an observation on 10/4/2023 at 10:48 a.m. during the initial tour of a recertification survey with the Registered Nurse (RN) 1, Oral B throat lozenges (medication used for sore throat) was found on Resident 205's bedside table without a physician order for self -administration (able to take medications on their own without the nurse being present). During a review of Resident 205's admission Record (face sheet) the face sheet indicated Resident 205 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spine), sepsis (infection in the blood) and acute respiratory failure (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit one of one resident (Resident 1) to return to the facility after hospitalization when Resident 1 was ready to be readmitted too the facility on 9/5/2023 and on 9/12/2023. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 having to remain in acute care hospital and unable to go back home (facility)and had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy (brain disorder that causes recurring seizures), gastrostomy (surgical opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall for introduction of food via tube ) , hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body), and dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set( [MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/22/2023, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by: 1. Failing to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- a notice that indicates when resident's care is set to end) and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a written medical order from a physician specifying the types of medical treatment residents want to receive during serious illness) in Spanish and Spanish translating service as requested by Resident 1 to understand NOMNC and POLST before signing the documents. 2. Failing to obtain Resident 1's dentures. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling lack of self-determination to make decisions, loss of dignity, and loss of self-esteem. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility initially on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop person centered care plans for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by: 1 Failing to follow up and to obtain Resident 1's dentures by Social Service Director (SSD). 2.Failing to provide and explain the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a written medical order from a physician) in a language that Resident 1 could understand.This failure has the potential to result in Resident 1's care needs not being addressed, and the lack of ability to identify the resident's ongoing needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility initially on 11/7/2019 and last readmission on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included end stage renal disease (kidneys can no longer support body's needs and unable to filter waste), diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar), abnormal gait (a change of walking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$34,613 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $34,613 — penalty dated 2024-10-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLCAlameda, CA 1 of 5Crescent City Care CenterCrescent City, CA 1 of 5French Park Care CenterSanta Ana, CA 1 of 5North Valley Nursing CenterTujunga, CA 1 of 5Tarzana Health And Rehabilitation CenterTarzana, CA 2 of 5Blythe Post Acute LLCBlythe, CA 2 of 5College Vista Post-AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Cottage Crest Post AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Diamond Ridge Healthcare CenterPittsburg, CA 2 of 5Gordon Lane Care CenterFullerton, CA 2 of 5Heritage ManorMonterey Park, CA 2 of 5Spring Valley Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 2 of 5Sunny Hills Post AcuteLa Mirada, CA 2 of 5Torrey Pines Post Acute And RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Trabuco Hills Post AcuteLake Forest, CA 2 of 5Villa Del Sol Post AcuteBellflower, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Healthcare Center, LLCAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Bonita Hills Post AcuteLa Habra, CA 3 of 5Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterRiverside, CA 3 of 5Country Oaks Care CenterPomona, CA 3 of 5Courtyard Care CenterSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Extended Care Hospital Of RiversideRiverside, CA 3 of 5Knolls West Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 3 of 5Menifee Lakes Post AcuteSun City, CA 3 of 5Mission Carmichael Healthcare CenterCarmichael, CA 3 of 5Pelican Ridge Post AcuteNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Sunset Manor Conv HospEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Vineland Post AcuteNorth Hollywood, CA 4 of 5Garden Park Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 4 of 5Las Vegas Post Acute & RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ocean View Post AcuteEscondido, CA 4 of 5Park Regency Care CenterLa Habra, CA 4 of 5Pomona Vista Care CenterPomona, CA 4 of 5Sierra View Care CenterBaldwin Park, CA 4 of 5Vista View Post AcuteVista, CA 5 of 5Alcott Rehabilitation HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Citrus Nursing CenterFontana, CA 5 of 5Del Mar Convalescent HospitalRosemead, CA 5 of 5Excell Health Care CenterOakland, CA 5 of 5Mission Care CenterRiverside, CA

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PARAMOUNT CONVALESCENT GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 09/08/1988
DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
FARRALES, MARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
JOHNSON, FRANKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/08/1988
KOCHEK, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
ANDRES, KEGANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
DEVERA, JOANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2019
OXFORD, MICHEALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2022
YAN, MALVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SUN MAR MANAGEMENT SERVICESOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/12/1989

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$906K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 25%Other / private 14%

This home reported $906K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$526per resident / day
operating cost
$15,984per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$524per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056446. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next