No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mission Carmichael Healthcare Center

3630 Mission Avenue, Carmichael, CA 95608 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 135 certified beds · (916) 488-1580 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (916) 488-1580 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3609 Mission Ave · (916) 484-4444 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.9 mi
4241 Marconi Ave · (916) 483-8479 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5025 Marconi Ave
Park
3344 Mission Ave · (916) 488-2810 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3655 Mulholland Way · (916) 481-2406

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.9%7.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.9%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.8%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.702.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.871.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.8%CMS range 28.2–44.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.5–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge85.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.5–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.53
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
38.5%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 126.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-22)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 126 and Resident 51) when:1. Follow-up appointments were cancelled and delayed for Resident 51; and,2. There was no monitoring and care plan for Resident 126's use of offloading boot (a specialized medical device designed to reduce pressure, friction, and weight on specific areas of the foot or heel).These failures resulted in delays in care for Resident 51 and increased Resident 126's risk to develop skin breakdown.Findings:During a review of Resident 51's admission records, the records indicated Resident 51 was admitted in February 2026 with diagnoses that included displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of left tibia and left fibula (both lower leg bones are broken into three or more fragments), fracture of part of neck of left femur (broken hip), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Resident 51's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the care and services necessary to ensure appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections were provided for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 126 and Resident 144) when:There was no physician order for suprapubic catheter (a tube inserted directly into the bladder to drain urine) and there was no output monitoring for Resident 126; andThere was no output monitoring for Resident 144 while the resident had suprapubic catheter in place.These failures decreased the facility's potential to monitor Resident 126's use of catheter and had the potential to place Resident 126 and Resident 144 at risk for complications, including urinary tract infections.During a review of Resident 126's admission records, the records indicated Resident 126 was admitted in 4/29/26 with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury), neuromuscular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, three residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident 1, Resident 3 and Resident 56) did not maintain weight and no root cause analysis was done to determine best approach for reversing weight loss. This failure had the potential of leading to malnutrition and death.Findings:1a. Review of Resident 1's (Res 1) chart indicated Res 1 was admitted during the winter of 24/25 with diagnosis including pneumonitis, immunodeficiency, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and diabetes.Res 1 had gone from a weight of 155 lbs. (pounds) as of 5/3/25, to a weight of 135 lbs. in 5/3/26. This was a loss of 20 lbs. or 12.9% of body weight over a year. While not meeting the definition of significant weight loss, the gradual, unintentional weight loss placed Res 1 at risk for muscle loss, functional decline and decreased immune response. This insidious (gradual, without trying) weight loss is often a red flag for underlying health issues. As such, identifying and addressing the root cause early is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide substitutions when the given meal was refused for three residents (Resident 1, Resident 26 and Resident 82) for a census of 129. This had the potential to result in hunger, weight loss, and malnutrition. Findings:During the initial resident interviews on 5/19/26 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 82 stated that he did not like the facility provided meals at times. Resident 82 further stated I'll just say I pass but complained that no meal substitute would be offered, leading to hunger. During the lunch meal observation 5/19/26 at 12:10 p.m., Resident 26 looked at her meal and wheeled out of the lower dining room. When asked, Resident 26 stated that she did not like the look of the meal. Observations were made of Resident 26 at 12:30 p.m. and 12:50 p.m. Resident appeared to be asleep in bed; no meal tray was on the bedside table. During a breakfast meal observation on 5/20/26 at 8:32 a.m., Resident 26 was interviewed in the hallway outside of her room. Resident 26 indicated that she did not receive a substitute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and posted mealtimes, the facility failed to keep the amount of time between dinner and breakfast to 14 hours or less for census of 129. This had the potential to result in residents' hunger and unstable blood sugar levels.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/19/26 at 8:55 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS showed a copy of the meal schedule. Meals were noted to start with breakfast at 7 a.m., lunch at 11:30 a.m., and dinner at 4:30 p.m. This represented 14 1/2 hours between dinner and breakfast. The DS denied that the facility provided all residents with a substantial nighttime snack.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the standards for food service safety for a census of 129 when:The water curtain/splash shield of the ice machine revealed calcium buildup,The floor in front of the ice machine had two large breaks of approximately 3 by 10,Food labeling in the dry storage was inconsistent with the storage guidelines, A box of beef patties was not securely covered in the freezer, andThe middle dining room was being used for haircuts as residents were set up for the lunch meal.These failures had the potential of leading to cross-contamination and food borne illness.1. During the initial kitchen tour on 5/19/26 at 8:40 a.m. with the Director of Maintenance (DOM), the Manitowoc ice machine was opened to view the internal components. The plastic screen (water curtain/splash shield) covering the ice grid was observed with calcium buildup on the inside of approximately 2 inches by 4 inches though it had been approximately 10 days since it was last serviced.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control prevention practices for 6 of 27 sampled residents (Resident 15, Resident 115, Resident 16, Resident 93, Resident 44, and Resident 128) when: 1. Staff did not use required personal protective equipment (PPE- clothing and equipment worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environment) while providing care to Resident 15 on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- an infection control method); 2. Staff did not perform hand hygiene in between glove use during wound care for Resident 115;3.Resident 16's Oxygen tubing was not stored properly;4. A glucometer for Resident 93 not cleaned per manufacture recommendations; 5. Resident 44's nebulizer machine (device that turns liquid medicine into mist that can be inhaled) was on the floor; and 6. Resident 128's oxygen tubing was on the floor. These failures put Resident 15, Resident 115, Resident 16, Resident 93, Resident 44, and Resident 128 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards for two of twenty-seven sampled Residents (Residents 78 and 93) when:1. Physician inhaler order for Resident 78 was not followed and 2. Resident 93's blood glucose was not obtained prior to mealtime insulin administration.These failures had the potential to result in provision of inappropriate treatment for both residents. Findings:1. A review of Resident 78's admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 78 was admitted in February 2026, with several diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a condition that causes obstruction of airflow and can make it difficult to breath) and asthma (a condition that causes narrowing of airways and can cause shortness of breath).Review of Resident 78's Order Summary Report with an order date 2/27/26, indicated Inhaler with Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol (a medication that decreases inflammation). Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 100-25 mcg (mcg-microgram a unit of measurement), 1 puff inhale orally one time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper foot care for 2 of 27 sampled residents (Resident 15, Resident 63) when: Resident 15 had thick and long toenails; and,Resident 63 had long, thickened toenails and the toenail on first toe of left foot was curving into second toe. These failures had the potential to cause foot infection, pain, and to decrease mobility.Findings: 1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 15 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including hereditary ataxia (gradual loss of muscle control, poor balance and uncoordinated movements) and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebrovascular disease (CVA- stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting the right dominant side. A review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 15 had short and long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in accordance with professional standard of practice for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 115 and Resident 128) when: Resident 115 had no oxygen signage and oxygen order in place; and, Resident 128 was not fitted with the correct BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure-noninvasive ventilation machine that helps with breathing) mask. These failures had the potential for Resident 115 and Resident 128 to experience respiratory distress and increased risk for fire hazard for Resident 115.Findings: 1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 115 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including myasthenia gravis (chronic autoimmune disorder [body's immune system attacks its own healthy tissues] which affects voluntary muscles controlling the eyes, chewing, swallowing, and breathing) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) with acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis (treatment to remove extra fluid and waste when kidneys fail) received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 5) when Resident 5's fluid restrictions (limits in the total daily intake of liquids) were not followed per physician's order.This failure placed Resident 5 at high risk for fluid overload (too much fluid in the body that could cause swelling, high blood pressure, breathing problems, and heart issues).During a review of Resident 5's admission records, the records indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (permanent kidney failure) and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/6/26, indicated Resident had intact cognition and did not exhibit behaviors of rejection of care.During a review of Resident 5's physician order, dated 4/23/26, the order indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had an annual performance review for three of three sampled CNA staff (CNA 3, CNA 4, and CNA 7).This failure had the potential for CNA 3, CNA 4, and CNA 7 to provide inadequate care to residents. Findings: During an interview on 5/21/26 at 1:13 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated he was responsible for conducting the performance evaluation for the CNAs. The DSD further stated he had not conducted a performance evaluation since he started last December. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/21/26 at 5 p.m. with the DSD, the Payroll Action Form for the 3 CNAs was reviewed. The Payroll Action Form indicated CNA 3 was hired on 12/12/23, CNA 4 was hired on 10/17/23 and CNA 7 was hired on 8/1/21. The DSD further stated he cannot find the annual performance evaluation for the 3 CNAs. During an interview on 5/22/26 at 10:28 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the performance evaluation for CNAs was done annually and the DSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services was provided for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 113) when Resident 113's lower denture was missing. This failure increased the potential for Resident 113 to experience difficulty in chewing and weight loss. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 113 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (the thyroid gland [small, butterfly -shaped gland in the neck] does not produce enough thyroid hormones leading to extreme fatigue, unintentional weight gain, and feeling cold all the time) and bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs). A review of Resident 113's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 3/31/26 indicated Resident 113 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool to screen and identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light device was accessible for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident 142) when Resident 142 was not able to reach his call light device to call for assistance. This failure placed Resident 142 at risk for his care needs to be unmet and at increased risk for falls. A review of Resident 142's admission Record indicated Resident 142 was admitted to the facility in May 2026 with multiple diagnoses including gangrene and necrosis of lung (complication of pneumonia causing death of lung tissue), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-damage to the airways or lungs that blocks airflow that makes it difficult to breathe), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), vascular dementia (inadequate blood flow to the brain causing changes in thinking skills and memory), and protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and calories). A review of Resident 142's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 5/11/26, indicated Resident 142 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were properly positioned during feeding assistance as per care plan and facility's meal assistance policy and procedure. This failure placed Resident 1 and Resident 2 at risk for aspiration and possible discomfort when eating. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in March 2025 with multiple diagnoses including COPD (a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) and GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease- a condition where stomach acid and food can flow backward from the stomach into the throat). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 3/28/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 6 out of 15 that indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's MDS, Functional Abilities and Goals, indicated Resident 1 required maximum assistance for rolling left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that discontinued non-controlled medications (pharmaceutical preparations that can only be obtained through a medical practitioner's prescription and dispensed by a pharmacist but are not considered controlled substances under the Controlled Substance Act) and those which remained in the facility after discharge of the patient were destroyed in the presence of two licensed nurses. This failure had the potential risk for diversion (deflection of prescription drugs from medical sources into the illegal market) and/or misuse of non-controlled medications. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 4:22 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the non-controlled medication disposition logbook was reviewed. The IP confirmed that the destruction of non-controlled medications was not being signed consistently by two licensed nurses on multiple dates and with multiple medications. Some of the documents reviewed had only…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices when the facility's medication error rate was more than 5% (percentage- number or ratio that expressed as a fraction of 100) for a resident census of 125. Medication administration observations were conducted over multiple days, at varied times, in random locations throughout the facility. The facility had a total of two errors out of 30 opportunities which resulted in a facility wide medication error rate of 6.67% in two out of eight residents (Resident 96 and Resident 132) observed for medication administration. These failures had the potential for unsafe and ineffective medication use of Resident 96 and Resident 132 and had the potential to affect the residents' medical conditions. Findings: 1. During a concurrent medication administration observation and interview which started on 3/24/25 at 11:48 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3, LN 3 stated she already checked Resident 96's blood sugar level, and it was 217. LN 3 then administered a total of seven units of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and supplies were properly labeled and stored in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines, the facility's policies and procedures, and accepted professional standards for a census of 125 residents when: 1. An unlabeled, opened glucose gel tube (a medication administered for low blood sugars) was found in medication cart North 3; 2. A discharged resident's medications were found loose in a bag in the medication room; and 3. The refrigerator in the North Medication Room was not within the correct temperature range. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe medication administration and drug diversion. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:03 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, a glucose gel tube was found in the top drawer of medication cart North-3. LN 2 confirmed the gel had been opened and there was no label which indicated the date it had been opened, or when it expired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and ensure food safety in accordance with professional standards for food service safety to prevent an outbreak of foodborne illness for the census of 125 residents when: 1. Food items found in the freezer were unlabeled with the open and the use by dates. a. opened bag of garlic bread; b. opened box of pork sausage links with net weight of 10 lb.; and c. opened box of fish fillet with net weight of 15 lb. 2. Food items found in the walk-in refrigerator unlabeled with the open and use by dates. a. mustard (condiments) with net weight of 48 oz; and b. honey mustard (dressing) with net weight of 1 gal. 3. Food items found in the dry storage room were unlabeled and had lapsed use by dates. a. corn meal with use by date of 2/17/25; b. cake mix with use by date of 2/30/25; c. soy sauce with net weight of 1 gal, unlabeled with the open and the use by date; and d. white powder with unreadable name label, the open date and the use by date. 4. four (4) dented cans were found in the dry storage room: a. artichoke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Upon the Team's entrance on 3/24/25 at 8 a.m., the DON instructed all surveyors to wear masks as they have current residents with an active respiratory infection in the facility. The DON emphasized that all employees are required to wear masks to promote infection control and decrease transmission of respiratory infection. During a concurrent observation and interview at the North Station hallway with the NP on 3/25/25 at 11:25 a.m., the NP was not wearing a mask, stood across from the North Nurses Station while reading documents. The NP acknowledged she should wear a mask as required by the facility to promote infection control. In a review of the facility's P&P titled, Management of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV, respiratory virus that infects the lungs and respiratory tract), date implemented 12/19/22, indicated, .3. Infection control principles will be followed to decrease the risk of transmission based on federal, state or local guidance. These principles include .d. Appropriate personal protective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light system was accessible for five out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 122, Resident 75, Resident 55, Resident 27, and Resident 112) when: 1. Resident 122 and Resident 75's call light button was not within reach; 2. Resident 55's call light was broken; and, 3. Bathroom call system was not available for Resident 27 and Resident 112. These failures had the potential to result in residents' needs not being met and prevent communication for assistance when needed. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 122's clinical record indicated Resident 122 was admitted August of 2024 and had diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). A review of Resident 122's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was initiated within 48 hours of a resident's admission for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 482), who was admitted to the facility with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line (a thin flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a larger vein near the heart to deliver medications) for antibiotic (a class of medications used to treat bacterial infections) administration. This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' care and could have resulted in serious health complications. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 482 on 3/4/25 with a PICC line and a diagnoses that included, septic arthritis (an infection of the joint caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi) of the right knee. A review of the Nurses Progress Note dated 3/4/25 at 10:17 p.m., indicated Resident 482 arrived at the facility at approximately 6:30 p.m., With a diagnosis of septic arthritis to right knee, on intravenous (administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed in accordance with professional standards of care for one out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 49), when Resident 49 did not receive wound care treatments consistently as ordered. This failure had the potential for Resident 49's wounds to worsen and for the resident to not achieve their highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with multiple diagnosis which included morbid obesity, venous insufficiency (condition where the veins in the legs do not function properly, allowing blood to flow backward instead of upward to the heart), and immunodeficiency (failure of the immune system to protect the body adequately from infection). During a review of Resident 49's Treatment Administration Records (TAR, a legal document used to record treatments given to the residents) for February 2025 and March 2025, Resident 49 had the following orders: TX (treatment): Coccyx (tailbone) wound cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry apply collagen,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an ordered contracture device (a soft device that gently straighten fingers that have become stiff and painful) for one of 29 sampled residents, Resident 70. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 70 not reaching their highest practicable level of functioning. Findings: Resident 70 was admitted in 2023 with multiple diagnosis which included Contractures (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) to the left and right hands. During an observation on 03/25/25 at 10:23 a.m. in Resident 70's room, Resident 70's was seen lying in bed without her contracture device applied to right hand. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/25/25 at 11:08 a.m. in Resident 70's room, with CNA 4 (Certified Nursing Assistant 4) Resident 70's right hand was observed without a contracture device. CNA 4 confirmed the contracture device was not applied to Resident 70's right hand. CNA 4 stated she is supposed to have devices on both hands and feet to avoid any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate services and assistance for prevention and/or early detection of possible urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) for one out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 84) when Resident 84's order for STAT (immediate) urinalysis (UA- a medical test that examines urine to check for various conditions, including urinary tract infections) was not done timely. This failure had the potential to result in delayed detection of a UTI subsequently causing delayed care and treatment which negatively affected Resident 84's health condition. Findings: A review of Resident 84's clinical record indicated Resident 84 was admitted November of 2022 and had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not receive enough nutrients or oxygen to function properly, leading to altered brain function), UTI, sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) resistance (and infection that is resistant to common antibiotics and may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper delivery of respiratory care consistent with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) for one out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4's physician's order for oxygen therapy was not followed. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe delivery of oxygen to Resident 4 and for Resident 4 to not achieve her highest practicable well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 4's clinical record indicated Resident 4 was admitted March of 2025 and had diagnoses that included respiratory failure (is a serious condition that develops when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood and makes it difficult for a person to breathe on his own), congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently), asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrow, and swell, and produce extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe), and need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities reported by the pharmacist to the facility were acted upon for one out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure put Resident 2 at an increased risk for developing adverse (unwanted, uncomfortable or dangerous) drug reactions related to medication therapy and had the potential for Resident 2 to not achieve their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with multiple diagnosis which included heart failure, depression, anxiety disorder, and myalgia (pain in a muscle or group of muscles). A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 2/11/25, indicated, Resident 2 had intact cognition. During a review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report, dated 3/26/25, Resident 2 had an order for, Esomeprazole Magnesium [blocks acid from being made in the stomach] Oral Capsule Delayed Release 40mg [milligrams, measure of unit] Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for chronic N/V [nausea and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary practices were instituted for food brought in to residents by family or visitors from outside the facility when food saved for resident consumption was unlabeled and undated for 25 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in consumption of food that is unsafe and cause foodborne illness in residents who received food from outside sources. Findings: During an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 3/26/25 at 12:20 p.m., the DM stated, nurses should label the food brought from home with the date received and the use by date to assure that the resident's food is safe to eat. A review of the facility's signage posted on the refrigerator's front door, undated, indicated, Please label the resident's food with the following details before putting it in the fried: [sic] Name and Rm# .Date Received .Used-by date (3 days from received). Any and all food items must have a date. Any food items that are not dated will be discarded. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve mobility and prevent decline in range of motion (ROM) for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 5) when Resident 5's frequency for Physical Therapy Rehabilitation (therapy given to restore an individual back to their highest possible level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being) were not followed. This failure had the potential for Resident 5 to experience decline in range of motion or impairment in mobility. Findings: A review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated Resident 5 was admitted May of 2024 and had diagnoses that included polyosteoarthritis (a chronic condition that causes the cartilage and bone in joints to break down in at least five joints at the same time), fusion of spine (permanently joined two or more backbone), and chronic pain syndrome (a condition that occurs when chronic pain causes other symptoms that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration to one resident (Resident 1) of two sampled residents when medications were left unattended at bedside. This decreased the facility's potential to ensure medications were safely ingested by the intended resident. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses which included anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness that can be a normal reaction to stress) and chronic pain syndrome (a condition that involves chronic pain that interferes with daily life and is accompanied by other symptoms). A review of Resident 1's care plan initiated on 7/31/24 indicated a focus on, Resident accusing NOC [nocturnal shift] nurse of not giving her medications that were scheduled . Licensed nurses were supposed to, increase communication between [Resident 1] .about care and living environment .Explain all procedures and .medications . A review of Resident 1's care plan initiated on 8/27/24 indicated a focus on,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) from physical abuse when Resident 2 hit Resident 1 with a cane. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining injury and pain to the right lower leg . Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was most recently admitted to the facility in October 2023 with multiple diagnoses including paraplegia (paralysis of the legs), Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness skin loss extending into deep tissues due to prolonged pressure to area) of the sacral region (bottom of the spine), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and dementia (loss of memory and thinking abilities). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 5/29/24, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 11 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 8/25/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures (P&P) for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of abuse in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 alleged that a female staff grabbed him firmly on the right arm. This failure resulted in a delayed investigation of Resident 1's abuse complaint and had placed Resident 1 and other residents in the facility at risk for further abuse, and possible serious physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted January of 2024 and had diagnoses that included parkinsonism (a clinical syndrome characterized by tremor, slowed movement, rigidity, and postural instability), care provider dependency, weakness, and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest that can interfere with daily lives). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive Patterns,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to hire a Director of Food and Nutrition Services who had the qualifications required. This had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the 124 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 3/18/24 at 8:38 a.m., there was not a certificate or degree in the Food and Nutrition Services office. In a subsequent interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) at 8:45 a.m., she stated that she had worked as the Food and Nutrition Services manager for the past year. She further explained that she had not yet completed the process to become a Certified Dietary Manager, nor had she received the required six hours of Title 22 instruction. During an interview on 3/19/24 at 9:08 a.m. with the Consultant Registered Dietitian (CRD) , she stated that her usual schedule was 35 hours per week. These hours were split between clinical nutrition and being a resource for the kitchen. She further explained that she does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a total of 124 residents who received facility prepared foods when: 1. Proper food labeling was not followed, 2. Expired foods were not discarded, 3. Perishable salads were not kept in safe food temperature range, 4. Foods were not kept covered while in storage, 5. Freezer had an ice drip from the fan onto the food box, 6. Cutting boards were found with debris on the cutting surface, and 7. Can opener tip was found rusted and missing metal. These failures had the potential to lead to food borne illness. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 3/18/24 beginning at 8:38 a.m., the following items were observed not having proper labeling: - a container of graham crackers without year, label indicated, Prep Date 3-11, Use by 5-11 - two whipped toppings without year, labels for both items indicated, Prep Date 3-18, Use Date 3-20 - a tray of butterscotch pudding without year, label indicated, Prep Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of 43 sampled residents (Resident 91, Resident 4, and Resident 46) were assisted with nail care as part of their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- normal daily functions required to meet basic needs) when; 1. Resident 91 had long fingernails with blackish substance underneath the fingernails; 2. Resident 4 had long fingernails with brownish substance underneath the fingernails; and, 3. Resident 46 had jagged fingernails with sharp edges with blackish substance underneath the fingernails. These failures had the potential for Resident 91, Resident 4, and Resident 46 to sustain injury and/or for the residents to acquire an infection. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 91's clinical record indicated Resident 91 was admitted August of 2021 and had diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease (build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls causing obstruction of blood flow), diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition causing too much sugar in the blood which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pharmacy services were maintained when controlled drug (medication that may be abused or cause addiction) record forms were inaccurately signed for a census of 126. The failure had the potential to result in diversion of the residents' medication. Findings: During a review of the controlled drug record forms for five discharged residents, under the section titled Disposition of Remaining Doses, there were two sections that the nurse who received the controlled medications could sign. The first section indicated, Doses Disposed and the second section indicated Doses discharged with Patient. Further review of the controlled drug forms indicated that the nurse received the controlled medications and signed the section indicating Doses discharged with Patient. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/19/24 at 10:31 a.m., of the controlled medication storage in the Director of Nursing's (DON) office, the DON verified that the controlled drug record forms were signed in the wrong section for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled correctly, when: 1. Loose pills and were found in the South wing medication cart one. 2. Opened vials and one bottle of perishable medications were not dated with open or expiration dates in the North wing medication room. 3. Packets of medicated powder did not have an expiration date in the North wing treatment cart three. 4. Opened inhaler and glucose strips were not dated with open or expiration dates in the North wing medication cart three. 5. Expired and discontinued medications were in the North wing medication cart three. 6. A bag containing medications for a resident was found in the nursing office closet. 7. Prescription eye ointment was found in a resident's room at the bedside and was not labeled with an open date. These failures had the potential for medication misuse, drug diversion, and diminish the medication effectiveness. Findings: 1. During an inspection of medication cart one on the South wing with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) on 3/18/24 at 12:40 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare foods that conserved nutritive value, flavor, and appearance; and served food at unappetizing temperatures. This had the potential of leading to poor intake, malnutrition and weight loss for the 124 residents eating facility prepared meals when: 1. Vegetables were heated for over 2 hours, 2. Pureed meals were prepared without measuring ingredients, and 3. Pureed food was prepared in a dirty food processor bowl. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 3/18/24 at 9:12 a.m., the steamer doors were opened, and a large pan of green beans were being heated. During the dining observation on 3/18/24 at 12:08 p.m. the first cart of lunch trays exited the kitchen. Review of John Hopkins Medicine website on How to Keep the Nutrients in your Veggies indicated, Cooking decreases some of the nutrients in vegetables. Higher temperatures and longer cooking times are the two variables that can cause more nutrient loss. 2. During a return…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate food allergies and food preferences for six of 43 sampled residents (Resident 100, Resident 26, Resident 34, Resident 57, Resident 97, and Resident 89). This had the potential of leading to allergic reactions (including death), as well as lead to poor intake and weight loss in the 124 residents receiving facility prepared meals. Findings: 1. Resident 100 was admitted in the middle of 2022 with diagnoses which included failure to thrive. During the lunch meal observation on 3/18/24 at 12:32 p.m., Resident 100 was unable to get coffee with his meal. He stated, As an American, usually we drink coffee and it has been scarce. The resident added, Sometimes I don't get ice cream. I prefer ice cream. Noted on the resident's meal tray was a piece of cake for dessert. On the meal card it indicated the resident's preference was ice cream. Licensed Nurse 13 (LN 13) brought Resident 100 two small cups of ice cream, and stated, So, the kitchen staff are supposed to know your preference for ice cream because it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program was followed and maintained for a census of 126 when: 1. A clean-linen delivery cart and two clean linen storage shelves were found with a thick layer of dusts in the laundry room; 2. A nasal cannula (oxygen tubing) had no labeled date for Resident 27; 3. An empty intravenous (IV) medication bag with no administration date and licensed nurse (LN) initial hanged in Resident 682's room; 4. An IV tubing was not labeled for Resident 131; 5. A urinary bag was found on the floor in Resident 19's room. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infection and cross-contamination in a vulnerable population. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/24, at 8:39 a.m., in the Laundry Room, with Laundry Staff (LS), the clean-linen delivery cart was stocked with clean linens and was found with thick layers of dust on its side corners. LS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential kitchen equipment (ice machine and oven) were in safe operating conditions. This had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the 124 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 3/18/24 at 8:52 a.m., the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) opened the ice machine to explain the cleaning process. He stated that the ice machine had problems with randomly shutting off. During the initial kitchen tour on 3/18/24 at 9:33 a.m., the right side of the oven was not working. During a revisit to the kitchen on 3/19/24 at 9:45 a.m. to observe lunch preparation, the survey team requested to calibrate our thermometers with the facility's. [NAME] 1 (CK 1) stated that she would be unable to use the ice bath method as the ice machine is not working again today. During a revisit to the kitchen on 3/19/24 at 10:14 a.m., CK 1 reported she had to change meal preparation and timing due to the right side of oven not working. Review of the US Food and Drug Administration's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right for privacy and dignity was promoted to maintain the resident's self-worth for one of 43 sampled residents (Resident 33), when the privacy curtains were not pulled, or the door not closed during resident care. This failure resulted in not attaining or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with diagnoses which included memory impairment and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 33's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 11/24/23, the NCP indicated, [Resident 33] is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs. During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/21/24, the MDS indicated Resident 33 had severe memory impairment and had been totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). During an observation on 3/21/24 at 10:18 a.m. in Resident 33's room, two staff members…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs for two of 43 sampled residents (Resident 588, Resident 28) when: 1. Resident 588's call light button was not within reach; and 2. Resident 28 was not assessed and provided with the appropriate call light type to call staff when needed. These failures resulted in the residents' not attaining their needs and not maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of an admission Record, Resident 588 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Malignant Neoplasm of lung (lung cancer) and Secondary malignant neoplasm of brain (brain cancer). During a review of Resident 588's Nursing Care Plan (NCP) titled, Falls/ADLs/Mobility, dated revision of 3/18/24, the care plan indicated Place the resident's call light within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was performed in accordance with the regulatory time frame for one of 43 sampled residents (Resident 681), when the admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool) was not completed. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not attaining the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 681 was admitted in late 2018 with diagnoses which included stroke, muscle weakness, malnutrition, and difficulty swallowing. During a review of Resident 681's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated the assessment was incomplete, still in progress, and overdue. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/24 at 10:23 a.m., Resident 681 was in bed, alert and verbal but minimally responsive, and stated, I am just new here. Let me go back to sleep. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/19/24 at 7:15 a.m., Resident 681 was in bed, awake and verbally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (BCP, document that outlines initial care needs) for two of 43 sampled residents (Resident 681 and Resident 6) when the BCP was not completed within 48 hours after the resident's admission. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings: 1. Resident 681 was admitted in late 2018 with diagnoses which included stroke, muscle weakness, malnutrition, and difficulty swallowing. During a review of Resident 681's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 3/4/24, the NCP indicated, Malnourished .complete mini nutritional evaluation. Evaluate for signs of impaired swallowing. During a review of Resident 681's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/5/24, the MDS indicated the assessment was incomplete, still in progress, and overdue. During a review of Resident 681's Baseline Care Plan (BCP), dated 3/15/24, the BCP indicated the Dietary/Nutritional Status section had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve mobility and prevent decline in range of motion (ROM) for two out of 43 sampled residents (Resident 107 and Resident 44) when Resident 107 and Resident 44's restorative nursing program (RNA program- interventions that actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning) frequency was not followed. This failure had the potential for Resident 107 and Resident 44 to experience decline in range of motion or impairment in mobility. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 107's clinical record indicated Resident 107 was admitted October of 2023 and had diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture of vertebra (collapse of a bone in the front of the spine which can lead to loss of strength, sensation, and/or reflexes), multiple fractures on bilateral (both sides) ribs, and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 107's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive Patterns, dated 1/13/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards, for one of 43 sampled residents (Resident 57), when there was an uneven pathway leading to, from and inside the designated smoking area. This failure resulted in Resident 57 feeling unsafe navigating the pathway to the smoking area and had the potential to result in accidents and injuries. Findings: Resident 57 was admitted to the facility in late 2019 with diagnoses of Spinal Stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal), abnormalities of gait and mobility and Major Depressive Disorder (feelings of sadness and/or loss of interest in daily activities). Review of the clinical record for Resident 57 included: A Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 12/25/23, indicated Resident 57 had no memory impairment. A smoking safety assessment, dated 1/3/24, indicated safety concerns for Resident 57 included her impaired gait and balance. During an interview with Resident 57, on 3/18/24 at 12:01 p.m., she stated, I feel unsafe with the cracks in the sidewalks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper delivery of respiratory care was consistent with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) and the professional standards of practice for one out of 43 sampled residents (Resident 18) when Resident 18's physician's order for oxygen therapy was not followed. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe delivery of oxygen to Resident 18 that could lead to respiratory problems. Findings: A review of Resident 18's clinical record indicated Resident 18 was originally admitted March of 2016 and had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of diseases that causes airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), respiratory failure ( a serious condition that develops when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood and makes it difficult for a person to breathe on his own), and dementia (impairment of the ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with everyday activities). A review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1). This failure had potential to result in under- and over-medicating a resident for pain. Findings: During an interview on 3/5/24 at 2:30 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated on Friday night 3/1/24, she had pain seven-eight (7-8)/10 (pain scale with 10 being the most pain) in right knee, and pressed the call light at 3 a.m. In between 3:30 a.m. and 4 a.m., a nurse came in with two Tylenol® (a medication commonly used for pain relief) pills, did not turn on the light, did not offer Resident 1 water, and turned off the call light. Resident 1 further stated she did not know the name of the nurse and described them as an African American nurse. A review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated March 2024, indicated on 3/1/24, for 3 a.m. to 4 a.m. administration time, the licensed nurse did not sign the administering Tylenol® to Resident 1 for pain. A review of Resident 1's Case Management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call system was functioning for three residents out of 65 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). This failure decreased the potential for the residents to get assistance from staff in a timely manner. Findings: During an observation on 3/5/24 at 12:30 p.m. in the North Hall, a light outside room number one above the door was lit up red. At the nurse's desk, the resident call system was not working for room number one. During an Interview on 3/5/24 at 12:34 p.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse at the nurse's desk in North Hall, IP Nurse verified the resident call system for room number one was not working and mentioned to notify the maintenance person. IP stated she was not aware of how long it had not been working. During an observation on 3/5/24 at 12:40 p.m. in the North Hall, a light outside room [ROOM NUMBER] above the door was lit red. At the nurse's desk, the resident call system did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID JOHNSON — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 47 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bay View Rehabilitation Hospital, LLCAlameda, CA 1 of 5Crescent City Care CenterCrescent City, CA 1 of 5French Park Care CenterSanta Ana, CA 1 of 5North Valley Nursing CenterTujunga, CA 1 of 5Tarzana Health And Rehabilitation CenterTarzana, CA 2 of 5Blythe Post Acute LLCBlythe, CA 2 of 5College Vista Post-AcuteLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Cottage Crest Post AcuteNorwalk, CA 2 of 5Diamond Ridge Healthcare CenterPittsburg, CA 2 of 5Gordon Lane Care CenterFullerton, CA 2 of 5Heritage ManorMonterey Park, CA 2 of 5Spring Valley Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 2 of 5Sunny Hills Post AcuteLa Mirada, CA 2 of 5Torrey Pines Post Acute And RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 2 of 5Trabuco Hills Post AcuteLake Forest, CA 2 of 5Villa Del Sol Post AcuteBellflower, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Healthcare Center, LLCAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Bonita Hills Post AcuteLa Habra, CA 3 of 5Community Care And Rehabilitation CenterRiverside, CA 3 of 5Country Oaks Care CenterPomona, CA 3 of 5Courtyard Care CenterSan Jose, CA 3 of 5Extended Care Hospital Of RiversideRiverside, CA 3 of 5Knolls West Post Acute LLCVictorville, CA 3 of 5Menifee Lakes Post AcuteSun City, CA 3 of 5Paramount Convalescent Hosp.Paramount, CA 3 of 5Pelican Ridge Post AcuteNewport Beach, CA 3 of 5Sunset Manor Conv HospEl Monte, CA 3 of 5Vineland Post AcuteNorth Hollywood, CA 4 of 5Garden Park Care CenterGarden Grove, CA 4 of 5Las Vegas Post Acute & RehabilitationLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ocean View Post AcuteEscondido, CA 4 of 5Park Regency Care CenterLa Habra, CA 4 of 5Pomona Vista Care CenterPomona, CA 4 of 5Sierra View Care CenterBaldwin Park, CA 4 of 5Vista View Post AcuteVista, CA 5 of 5Alcott Rehabilitation HospitalLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Citrus Nursing CenterFontana, CA 5 of 5Del Mar Convalescent HospitalRosemead, CA 5 of 5Excell Health Care CenterOakland, CA 5 of 5Mission Care CenterRiverside, CA

Showing 40 of 47; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MISSION CARMICHAEL POST ACUTE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2022
JOHNSON, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2021
JOHNSON, FRANKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/11/2021
BALECHA, RUDOLPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/11/2023
DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
KOCHEK, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
OXFORD, MICHEALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2022
VILLAMOR, LORENAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2024
CIBC BANK USAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2021
SMV CARMICHAEL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2005
SUN MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2021
DHIR, SUNILIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2015
FARRALES, MARYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$919K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 8%Other / private 7%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $919K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$359per resident / day
operating cost
$10,914per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$344per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056304. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next